A Critical Study of the National Institute for School Leadership in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts John Michael Perella University of Massachusetts Boston
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Massachusetts Boston ScholarWorks at UMass Boston Graduate Doctoral Dissertations Doctoral Dissertations and Masters Theses 6-1-2012 A Critical Study of the National Institute for School Leadership in the Commonwealth Of Massachusetts John Michael Perella University of Massachusetts Boston Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.umb.edu/doctoral_dissertations Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Perella, John Michael, "A Critical Study of the National Institute for School Leadership in the Commonwealth Of Massachusetts" (2012). Graduate Doctoral Dissertations. Paper 75. This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Doctoral Dissertations and Masters Theses at ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CRITICAL STUDY OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR SCHOOL LEADERSHIP IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS A Dissertation Presented by JOHN M. PERELLA Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies University of Massachusetts Boston, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION June 2012 Leadership in Urban Education Program © 2012 by John M. Perella All rights reserved A CRITICAL STUDY OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR SCHOOL LEADERSHIP IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS A Dissertation Presented by JOHN M. PERELLA Approved as to style and content by: _________________________________________________ Jack Leonard, Assistant Professor Chair of Committee _________________________________________________ Joseph Check, Professor Member _________________________________________________ Ray Shurtleff, Lecturer Member ________________________________________________ Joseph Check, Graduate Program Director Leadership in Urban Schools ________________________________________________ Wenfan Yan, Chair Department of Leadership in Education ABSTRACT A CRITICAL STUDY OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR SCHOOL LEADERSHIP IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS June 2012 John M. Perella, B.A., University of Massachusetts Amherst M.A.T., Salem State University C.A.G.S., Salem State University Ed.D., University of Massachusetts Boston Directed by Assistant Professor Jack Leonard Since 2005, the National Institute for School Leadership (NISL) has contributed to school leadership training in Massachusetts and has trained over 945 superintendents, principals and school administrators with a very unique mission and leadership style (MA Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, 2010) and yet very little is known about the program origins or philosophy. The current study seeks to understand NISL’s origins, objectives and financial and philosophical foundations while determining the extent it is understood by educators who have been through the training. This research utilized critical theory to conduct a qualitative study through content analysis of the curriculum and interviews of NISL leadership, facilitators, participants and DESE leaders involved in its implementation. Neoliberal and iv privatization indicators were also developed and used to determine trends and relationship within the program. NISL is a program that was created by a small group of public school reformers from The National Center for Education and the Economy (NCEE), a Washington think tank. Unlike the academies of the past, NISL is a non-collegiate, for-profit, private institution. It was developed as a means to influence public education through the benchmarked training of school leaders and was initially resourced by a combination of private and non-profit organizations. NISL’s philosophical foundation derives primarily from Marc Tucker, a noted leader of the standards driven education reform movement, and NCEE. They, in turn, benchmarked the structures and strategies of military, private business and international leadership training and education systems. Participant awareness of the NISL program (history, context and agenda) is minimal. The findings reveal that there are strong elements of both privatization efforts and neoliberalism within the NISL program. v DEDICATION To Elizabeth, Jack and Benjamin To my parents – Thank you for always believing in me To Thea vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am unable to put into words the role Dr. Jack Leonard has played in my completion of this dissertation. I cannot imagine how many times he had to read, re-read and edit my research. You may know this material better than I do! I will truly miss our discussions, thank you. I must also thank David DeRuosi. You have always pushed me to take my thoughts to the next level. Thank you to the entire LIUS staff. Tricia Kress, Joe Check, Jay Dee, Ray Shurtleff and Molly Pedriali – you all played an enormous role in helping me complete this feat. And thank you to my classmates in the 2006 cohort, especially Dianne Kelly. Working with you made my experience in the program unforgettable. Thank you to my family and friends for understanding and believing in me. Thank you to my three beautiful children, Elizabeth, Jack and Benjamin. From your love, I found the strength to complete this study. Thank you to Thea Popolizio, you have been with me for every step on this journey. Finally, thank you to all the participants in this study. I will never forget your words and kindness. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION....................................................................................................... vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .................................................................................... vii CHAPTER Page 1. RATIONALE FOR EXAMINING THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR SCHOOL LEADERSHIP ............................................................................1 Introduction......................................................................................1 Initial Problem Statement ................................................................4 The National Institute for School Leadership (NISL) .....................5 NISL Engagement in Massachusetts .............................................11 Purpose...........................................................................................12 Research Questions........................................................................13 Context...........................................................................................13 Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks ......................................18 Methodology..................................................................................21 Rationale and Benefits ...................................................................22 2. CONCEPTUAL AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKS WITH LITERATURE REVIEW ..........................................................................23 Rationale ........................................................................................23 Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks ......................................24 Theoretical Framework.............................................................24 Historical Contextualization .....................................................30 Neoliberalism and its Role in Public Education .......................38 Growth of Neoliberalism ..........................................................44 Privatization ..............................................................................45 Comparative Leadership Curricula................................................57 Previous Research on NISL...........................................................64 3. METHODOLOGY ................................................................................66 Introduction to Methods.................................................................66 Participants.....................................................................................69 Research Parameters and Time Line..............................................71 Data Collection and Analysis.........................................................74 Limitations and Conclusions..........................................................78 4. RESEARCH CONDUCTED.................................................................81 Introduction....................................................................................81 viii CHAPTER Page 2011 Old Dominion Report ...........................................................82 NISL and NCEE ............................................................................85 Interview Findings .........................................................................89 NISL Operations .......................................................................93 NISL in Massachusetts .............................................................96 The NISL Experience ...............................................................98 The NISL Plan for the Future ...................................................99 Participant Awareness of the History/Foundation of NISL....102 The NISL Curriculum..................................................................103 Key Informants .......................................................................107 The Business Model................................................................111 The Military Model.................................................................116 What is Missing from the NISL Curriculum ..........................120 Marc Tucker.................................................................................121