DOCSLIB.ORG

Los Padres National Forest Trail Planning

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Los Padres National Forest Trail Planning Notley's Landing View Pullout P al o Ca lo ra do C an yo n Cr ee 61 k K in G g arra R pa d tos Rd ROCKY CREEK BRIDGE 60 Castle Rock View Pullout Bixby Bridge View Pullout BIXBY CREEK BRIDGE B ix 59 b y C re e Brazil Ranch k TW IN PEAK S TRAIL Hurricane Point View Pullouts TW IN PEAK S - D E V 58 IL S P EA K 1 T RA IL MAXINE SIDEHILL VIADUCT Brazil Ranch Rocky Creek 57 Mill Creek Redwood Preserve P CAROL SIDEHILL VIADUCT a lo C o lo ELLEN SIDEHILL VIADUCT r ad o Little Sur Lagoon View Pullouts R d T ur DARLA SIDEHILL VIADUCT ne r C re 56 ek T LITTLE SUR RIVER BRIDGE U d R R N t Si 2 s erra Creek t E oa n R C e C ld m R O g e E S E 55 g K in n n la P y it n u m m o C Point Sur State Historic Park k e re l C il M Point Sur State Historic Park IL A TR Point Sur State Historic Park E 54 G Pt. Sur State Historic Park - Pt.Sur Lightstation ID R E ER NT N ME Naval Facility Point Sur# IN LE SK C B N ig SA P in Restroom e s T r l r ur Rive PicnicArea Little S L S I TTL KIN E SUR TLE SU Parking NER T R S I CA R o L M ID u P G th E Camping F o B r ig r k es T l L P in it t le Lodging S u r R iv e 53 r Food Bridge Milepost ek Culvert n Cre V anyo e iss C L nt Sw IT a T na L Existing Trail T E rl S U R All Types R I V E R Pedestrian 1 1 Pedestrian, Bike 52 Pedestrian, Equestrian Existing Trail - Informal Use - Private Property B IG All Types P Skinner Creek I N Pedestrian E C HE o ADL C m JA A o m CK Pedestrian, Bike NDS T m S RAIL u ON m n CA u it MP AIL L n y TR I Pedestrian, Equestrian BEAC H Coast Road it P A y l R a P n T l CR A a n EA n in Highway 1 B ME R n LU RY OLE i g MEADOW RAI EAST M n S FF T L g e S 51 S g T e m Local Road R g e A m n I e t L Andrew Molera State Park n 2 t Unpaved Road Main Trailhead Complex 3 Stream Community Planning Segment R EK ID CRE G Recreation Area E E K T A R SN 1 A E I Big Sur River Land Management L L T 2 AT BLM R 3 Andrew Molera State Park 4 Los Padres National Forest CA Fish and Game R Puerto Suello Creek 5 IV E 50 CA Parks and Rec. R B 6 T O R B A C Monterey Co. I 7 L A T MONTEREY T 8 R Monterey Co. Regional Park District Pacific COUNTY A 9 IL Ocean RAIL Other State 10 NG T SPRI 11 Other Conservation 12 U.S. Forest Service 13 14 Pheneger Creek Private SO 49 l P U Tr A T ana N H t en O BOU AIL NVE R NDAR Y TR River Inn & The Village Shops CO A E Trail Planning Map - Sheet 4 L M B A U T O R D A L 0 0.5 1 IL I A Big Sur Coastal Trail Master Plan A Mile N R Big Sur Campground & Cabins A Source: Data obtained from Monterey Co., US Forest Service, CA Coastwalk, and Big Sur CHMP T N T GE VE Author: Roy Harju Andrew Molera State Park ID Date: 6/04/10 R Big Sur 1 in = 0.5 miles Cle Big Sur River ar Ridge Rd Riverside Campground & Cabins Jua TIN n H HOU ig SE P ue U Ripplewood / Glen Oaks Resort Complex ra Cre E ek R T O S 48 U Ripplewood / Glen Oaks Resort Complex E JUAN HIGUERA CREEK BRIDGE L O Big Sur Grange Pfe iffe RNW r Rd FE O OD CA MPG ROU Pfeiffer Big Sur State Park ND TR AIL Fernwood Resort M id rl d T l a e P n f a R e t d i n f e f V e 47 r R i d g e eek Cr R ood d Big Sur River edw fer R Falotico Pfeif Big Sur Lodge Pfeiffer Big Sur State Park ek Sy Cre cam Los Padres National Forest na or nta e Ca Ve nyo BIG SUR RIVER BRIDGE Big Sur River n Rd Big Sur River Pfeiffer-Big Sur State Park Campground Sy cam ore Ca ny on Cr eek Big Sur Station MT.MANUEL 46 Pfeiffer Big Sur State Park Sycamore Canyon Road PFEIFFER CANYON BRIDGE A CAM N P 1 A T 3 t N en E Big Sur Center m 4 V g nt Se e g m n eg Loma Vista ni S an ng Pl i y nn 45 it la k n P e u e y r m t C i t m n s o u o P C m m Co Ventana Inn & Campground Post Ranch Inn First Growth COAST RIDGE TRAIL K Gelbart TERRAC E CRE E Nepenthe 44 n Creek Mule Canyo k Cree Big Sur River nyon es Ca Grav Henry Miller Memorial Library Cas tro Canyon Creek Los Padres National Forest (MT) C 1 o m m u n i t y P l a n n i n g S e g m e n t 4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PT. SUR NAVAL FACILITY, PT. SUR, CA: a BRIEF HISTORY February 8, 2010
    PT. SUR NAVAL FACILITY, PT. SUR, CA: A BRIEF HISTORY February 8, 2010 The Significance of the Point Sur Naval Facility. According to the dictionary, significance is “the quality of being important.” In the field of historic preservation the word has a special meaning. Assessing significance involves determining the importance of a historic resource, whether a building, site, or something else, within the broad sweep of history. To do this, the resource must be placed into a historic context. A historic context is a backdrop within which a historic resource can be viewed. One cannot look at a building in a vacuum, it must be looked at in the broader context within which it exists. From this historic context, the relative importance of a resource can be determined. Point Sur’s Role in the Winning of the Cold War. During the Cold War as the Soviet Union rapidly built-up its submarine force, U.S. antisubmarine warfare took on a growing significance. One critical American development was pioneering detection of low frequency submarine sound propagation in the sea. This led to development of the Sound Surveillance System (SOSUS), which were employed at Naval Facilities (NAVFACs) across the globe. SOSUS greatly assisted the U.S. in maintaining its dominance in anti-submarine warfare, and was critical to American efforts to win the Cold War. Established in 1957, the Pt. Sur NAVFAC is one of the few remaining complete Naval Facilities, and the only one remaining on the west coast. While other Naval Facilities were parts of larger military complexes, Pt. Sur was established as a stand-alone, self-sufficient base.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report: National Register of Historic Places/California Register of Historical Resources Evaluation for The
    Prepared for: FINAL REPORT: NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES/CALIFORNIA REGISTER OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION FOR THE POINT SUR NAVFAC, POINT SUR Central Coast Lighthouse Keepers STATE HISTORIC PARK, CALIFORNIA P.O. Box 223014 Carmel, CA 93922 And Monterey District 2211 Garden Road Monterey, CA 93940 Prepared by: P.O. Box 721 Pacific Grove, California 93950 April 2013 Point Sur NAVFAC Final National/California Register Evaluation PAST Consultants, LLC April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................... 1 II. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 3 Project Description..................................................................................................... 4 Project Team .............................................................................................................. 5 Organization of the Report ........................................................................................ 5 Methodology and Research Materials ...................................................................... 6 Previous Evaluations and Correspondence ............................................................... 8 Federal Guidelines for the Documentation and Historical Evaluation of Cold War Properties..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Point Sur SHP General Plan/FEIR
    Point Sur State Historic Park ▪ General Plan POINT SUR STATE HISTORIC PARK GENERAL PLAN/FINAL EIR State Clearing House #2003011056 Approved by the State Park and Recreation Commission on September 17, 2004 Amended on March 2, 2011 Point Sur State Historic Park ▪ General Plan This document represents the Final General Plan and Environmental Impact Report approved by the State Park and Recreation Commission on September 17, 2004. Also included are changes that were made through the GP Amendment process in March 2011. General Plan Amendment The Point Sur State Historic Park (PSSHP) General Plan was adopted by the State Park and Recreation Commission (SPRC) in September 2004. Following that action, the Department of Parks and Recreation (CSP) found that the rehabilitation of the housing on the site was not feasible due to the costs associated with extensive mold contamination. In addition, a CEQA lawsuit was filed against CSP, alleging impacts with hydrologic and biologic resource issues, and visual impacts in a critical viewshed. The proposed removal of the housing has resolved the issues associated with the CEQA litigation. An Amendment to the General Plan was approved by the SPRC in March 2011 that removes the references to the use of the existing housing units at Pt. Sur SHP. The amended text changes are incorporated into this Final General Plan document, and shown in red as underlined text for additions or strikethrough text for deleted items. Point Sur State Historic Park ∙ General Plan A view of Point Sur State Historic Park The Lantern Room Point Sur State Historic Park General Plan/Final EIR September 17, 2004 State Clearing House #2003011056 Amended March 2, 2011 Arnold Schwarzenegger Governor Michael Chrisman Secretary of Resources Ruth Coleman Director of Parks and Recreation State of California The Resources Agency Department of Parks and Recreation P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Findings of the Monterey County LCP Periodic Review, Table PA
    Draft Findings of the Monterey County LCP Periodic Review December 2003 Table PA-10e Coastal Access Points - Big Sur Coast Planning Area LUP Site Specific Implementa Managing Periodic Review ACCESS AREA Class a Comments Recommendation tion Agency Recommendations 1 Malpaso Beach (Otter 2 a. Secure offer of Beach owned by Big Sur Land Retain; find agency to accept Cove) dedicated access. U BSLT Trust; OTD from beach to access highway not yet accepted b. "Improve trail, Only available parking is in Install parking improvements parking." N U turnout, south of bridge when management resources are available; see Appendix A, p. 140. 1 Otter Cove 3 a. Secure offer of lateral Status of OTD is unclear Investigate status of OTD. N BSLT access. b. Discourage informal Owners Electric gate across private road; Retain Y access. Assn. No public entrance to Otter Cove. 1 South of Otter Cove 1 a. Secure access through Private Obtain lateral access easement for N NC permits. Owner CCT. b. Develop scenic Develop trail to bluff edge if N U NC overlooks. property becomes available 2 Doud Property – now 1 a. Complete State Park Recommend updating Update Garrapata State Park - acquisition name to reference Garrapata State Soberanes Point Area Park with three sub-areas for Soberanes Point, Granite Creek Y DPR NC and Garrapata Beach areas; consider adding adjacent county open space and Coastal Conservancy lands on inland side of highway b. Discourage informal Retain Y DPR NC access. 2 Doud Property – now 1 a. Maintain access for Rock climbers still allowed to Update name to reference Garrapata State Park - rock climbers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Esalen Institute (1961-) by an Immensely Grateful Reader of Miles Mathis
    The Esalen Institute (1961-) by an immensely grateful reader of Miles Mathis Esalen lodge in the early 1960s.1 “A fellowship of those of us who in our various ways are working to see and to incarnate this new world that wants to be born, this emerging human nature... linked to all our ancestors and pointing to the past.” -Michael Murphy (one of the two credited Esalen co-founders)2 I think the quote from Michael Murphy says it all about The Esalen Institute. In this paper we will find some connections to the recent Global Business Network3 guest paper. Esalen was created in 1962 at the Slate’s Hot Springs, Big Sur in Monterey County which is about 1 hour and 10 minutes by car (45 miles or 72 km) south of the town of Monterey. Esalen lies close to California State Route 1 (Highway 1), the coastal road between San Francisco and Los Angeles. The Esalen Institute in 2015.4 1 Esalen Online Gallery | Esalen. Retrieved 2021-01-26. 2 50 Years of Life at Esalen, A Journey through the Archives 1962-2012 [0 min]. Retrieved 2021-01- 26 3 The Global Business Network. (mileswmathis.com). Retrieved 2021-01-26. 4 Slates Hot Springs, California - Wikipedia. Retrieved 2021-01-26. The two founders of Esalen are Michael Murphy (1930-) and Richard “Dick” Price (1930- 1985). Esalen was formed in the lodge that was already existing on the land owned by Michael Murphy’s grandmother, Vinnie “Bunny” McDonald Murphy (1873-1966), who lived in Monterey, CA .5,6 Vinne McDonald Murphy was the wife of Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Existing Conditions and Resources Inventory Report
    Existing Conditions and Resources Inventory Report Point Lobos Ranch Property May 2013 – Rev. December 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. ........... 1-1 2 LAND USE AND POLICY REVIEW............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Regional Land Uses...................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Land Use and Zoning ................................................................................................................... 2-7 2.3 Relevant Planning Policies ......................................................................................................... 2-11 2.3.1 Carmel Area Land Use Plan.......................................................................................... 2-11 2.4 Easements................................................................................................................................... 2-12 2.5 Existing Facilities....................................................................................................................... 2-12 3 SIGNIFICANT RESOURCE VALUES........................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Physical Resources ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Big Sur Doghole Ports
    BIG SUR DOGHOLE PORTS: A FRONTIER MARITIME CULTURAL LANDSCAPE By Jason Field A thesis submitted to Sonoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTERS OF ARTS in Cultural Resources Management Margaret Purser, Ph.D., Chair Department of Anthropology Laura Watt, Ph.D. Department of Environmental Studies and Planning Rae Schwaderer, M.A. Associate State Archaeologist, CA Department of Parks and Recreation Copyright 2017 By Jason Field ii Authorization for Reproduction I grant permission for the print or digital reproduction of this thesis [project] in its entirety, without further authorization from me, on the condition that the person or agency requesting reproduction absorbs the cost and provide proper acknowledgement of authorship. DATE: 4/12/2017 Jason Field Name iii Big Sur Doghole Ports: A Frontier Maritime Cultural Landscape Thesis by Jason Field ABSTRACT Purpose: This study seeks to establish a foundation of research for a subject that has been largely overlooked in the archaeological and historical literature of California in general and Big Sur in particular. Doghole ports served as essential conduits of transportation, communication, and commerce in maritime frontier regions that lacked developed terrestrial transportation networks. Understanding the role of these landings will greatly increase the historic context of the surrounding landscape. In addition, since many doghole ports had not been recorded as archaeological sites prior to this study, it aims to determine what types of archaeological signatures exist and introduce frameworks for interpreting and managing these unique sites. Procedure: This study gathered and examined historical documents, including photographs, maps, land patents, articles of incorporation, and newspapers in an attempt to define a historic context of Big Sur’s maritime landscape during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
    [Show full text]