DOCSLIB.ORG

Wolf Spiders and Fishing Spiders Wolf Spiders Description

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wolf Spiders and Fishing Spiders Wolf Spiders Description Wolf Spiders and Fishing Spiders Eric Day, Department of Entomology, Virginia Tech Wolf Spiders Fishing Spiders Description: Wolf spiders are usually large, hairy Description: Fishing spiders are some of the spiders that are not associated with webs. Color largest spiders found in Virginia. They are up to 3 ranges from tan to dark brown and often have inches in length, but appear to be much bigger stripes running the length of the body. Order: when found on walls. Fishing spiders are in the Araneae:, Family: Lycosidae. Genus Dolomedes, Family: Habitat: Common household pest in the fall Habitat: Primarily found near water or moist when they are looking for a warm place for woods throughout the eastern United States winter; found around doors, windows, where they are native. They do wander into houseplants, basements and garages. Outside houses or climb on outside walls. They feed they will be found on the ground looking for mostly on insects and some species feed on fish, insects to feed upon. thus their name. Control: Since they are not poisonous it is best to leave them alone or move them outside. If the presence of this harmless spider is objectionable, a spot treatment with an aerosol insecticide will take care of them. Wolf spider adult. David Cappeart, MSU, Bugwood.org Control: A general spray for spiders is not recommended, unless the infestation seems severe. Spot spray individual spiders if you find them objectionable. Interesting Facts: For the most part, spiders are beneficial, eating insects and other spiders, but a wolf spider can bite if handled. Wolf spiders Dolomedes okefinokensis (fishing spider) adult, provide control of many pests that live on the Mohammed El Damir, Bugwood.org ground. Replaces: VCE 3104-1586 2016 Virginia Tech 3104-1586 (ENTO-212NP) .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dna Sequence Data Indicates the Polyphyl Y of the Family Ctenidae (Araneae )
    1993. The Journal of Arachnology 21 :194–201 DNA SEQUENCE DATA INDICATES THE POLYPHYL Y OF THE FAMILY CTENIDAE (ARANEAE ) Kathrin C . Huber', Thomas S . Haider2, Manfred W . Miiller2, Bernhard A . Huber' , Rudolf J. Schweyen2, and Friedrich G . Barth' : 'Institut fair Zoologie, Althanstr . 14; 1090 Wien; and 2lnstitut fur Mikrobiologie and Genetik; Dr. Bohrgasse 9 ; 1030 Wien (Vienna), Austria . ABSTRACT. Mitochondrial DNA fragments comprising more than 400 bases of the 16S rDNA from nine spider species have been sequenced: Cupiennius salei, C. getazi, C. coccineus and Phoneutria boliviensis (Ctenidae), Pisaura mirabilis, Dolomedes fimbriatus (Pisauridae), Pardosa agrestis (Lycosidae), Clubiona pallidula (Clubi- onidae) and Ryuthela nishihirai (syn. Heptathela nishihirai; Heptathelidae: Mesothelae). Sequence divergence ranges from 3–4% among Cupiennius species and up to 36% in pairwise comparisons of the more distantly related spider DNAs. Maximally parsimonious gene trees based on these sequences indicate that Phoneutri a and Cupiennius are the most distantly related species of the examined Lycosoidea . The monophyly of the family Ctenidae is therefore doubted ; and a revision of the family, which should include DNA-data, is needed . Cupiennius salei (Ctenidae) is one of the most get a high copy number of the DNA segment of extensively studied species of spiders (see Lach - interest. The PCR depends on the availability of muth et al. 1985). The phylogeny of the Ctenidae , oligonucleotides that specifically bind to the a mainly South and Central American family, i s flanking sequences of this DNA segment. These poorly understood ; and systematists propose oligonucleotides serve as primers for a polymer- highly contradicting views on its classification ization reaction that copies the segment in vitro.
    [Show full text]
  • Hundreds of Species of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Live in Illinois In
    Illinois A B aquatic sowbug Asellus sp. Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella AAqquuaattiicc mayfly A. adult Hexagenia sp.; B. nymph Isonychia sp. MMaaccrrooiinnvveerrtteebbrraatteess Photographs © Michael R. Jeffords northern clearwater crayfish Orconectes propinquus Photograph © Michael R. Jeffords ruby spot damselfly Hetaerina americana Photograph © Michael R. Jeffords aquatic snail Pleurocera acutum Photograph © Jochen Gerber,The Field Museum of Natural History predaceous diving beetle Dytiscus circumcinctus Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella monkeyface mussel Quadrula metanevra common skimmer dragonfly - nymph Libellula sp. Photograph © Kevin S. Cummings Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella water scavenger beetle Hydrochara sp. Photograph © Steve J.Taylor devil crayfish Cambarus diogenes A B Photograph © ChristopherTaylor dobsonfly Corydalus sp. A. larva; B. adult Photographs © Michael R. Jeffords common darner dragonfly - nymph Aeshna sp. Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella giant water bug Belostoma lutarium Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella aquatic worm Slavina appendiculata Photograph © Mark J. Wetzel water boatman Trichocorixa calva Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella aquatic mite Order Prostigmata Photograph © Michael R. Jeffords backswimmer Notonecta irrorata Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella leech - adult and young Class Hirudinea pygmy backswimmer Neoplea striola mosquito - larva Toxorhynchites sp. fishing spider Dolomedes sp. Photograph © William N. Roston Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella Photograph © Michael R. Jeffords Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella Species List Species are not shown in proportion to actual size. undreds of species of aquatic macroinvertebrates live in Illinois in a Kingdom Animalia Hvariety of habitats. Some of the habitats have flowing water while Phylum Annelida Class Clitellata Family Naididae aquatic worm Slavina appendiculata This poster was made possible by: others contain still water. In order to survive in water, these organisms Class Hirudinea leech must be able to breathe, find food, protect themselves, move and reproduce.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Non-Insect Invertebrates of Steele Creek Park
    Checklist of Non-Insect Invertebrates of Steele Creek Park Harvestmen (Order Opiliones) __ Leiobunum aldrichi __ Leiobunum vittatum (Eastern Harvestman) __ Odiellus nubivagus __ Odiellus pictus __ Vonones sayi (Ornate Harvestman) Centipedes (Class Chilopoda) __ Geophilus vittatus (Diamondback Soil Centipede) __ Hemiscolopendra marginata (Florida Blue Centipede, Eastern Bark Centipede) __ Scolopocryptops nigridius __ Scolopocryptops sexspinosus (Eastern Fire Centipede) __ Strigamia bothriopus __ Theatops posticus (Smooth-tailed Forceps Centipede) __ Cryptops leucopodus Millipedes (Class Diplopoda) __ Apheloria montana (Cherry Millipede) __ Brachycybe lecontii (Feather Millipede) __ Cambala annulata __ Oxidus gracilis (Greenhouse Millipede)* __ Pseudopolydesmus canadensis __ Abacion magnum __ Abacion tesselatum __ Euryurus leachii __ Andrognathus corticarius (Cope’s Noodle Millipede) __ Narceus americanus-annularis (American Giant Millipede) Spiders (Order Araneae) __ Agelenopsis sp. (Grass Spider) __ Araneus marmoreus (Marbled Orbweaver) __ Araniella displicata (Six-spotted Orbweaver) __ Dolomedes albineus (White-striped Fishing Spider) __ Dolomedes tenebrosus (Dark Fishing Spider) __ Dolomedes triton (Six-spotted Fishing Spider) __ Dolomedes vittatus (Banded Fishing Spider) __ Larinioides cornutus (Furrow Orbweaver) __ Leucage venusta (Orchard Orbweaver) __ Micrathena gracilis (Spiny Micrathena) __ Micrathena mitrata (White Micrathena) __ Micrathena sagitatta (Arrow-shaped Micrathena) __ Misumenoides formosipes (White-banded Crab Spider) __ Neoscona crucifera (Spotted Orbweaver) __ Phidippus audax (Bold Jumping Spider) __ Phidippus otiosus (Canopy Jumping Spider) __ Phidippus putnami (Putnam’s Jumping Spider) __ Platycryptus undatus (Tan Jumping Spider) __ Pardosa sp. (Thin-legged Wolf Spider) __ Pirata sp. (Pirate Wolf Spider) __ Rabidosa rabida (Rabid Wolf Spider) __ Schizocosa crassipes (Brush-footed Wolf Spider) __ Synema parvulum (Black-banded Crab Spider) __ Tetragnatha sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Kansas Spiders
    A Pocket Guide to Common Kansas Spiders By Hank Guarisco Photos by Hank Guarisco Funded by Westar Energy Green Team, American Arachnological Society and the Chickadee Checkoff Published by the Friends of the Great Plains Nature Center i Table of Contents Introduction • 2 Arachnophobia • 3 Spider Anatomy • 4 House Spiders • 5 Hunting Spiders • 5 Venomous Spiders • 6-7 Spider Webs • 8-9 Other Arachnids • 9-12 Species accounts • 13 Texas Brown Tarantula • 14 Brown Recluse • 15 Northern Black Widow • 16 Southern & Western Black Widows • 17-18 Woodlouse Spider • 19 Truncated Cellar Spider • 20 Elongated Cellar Spider • 21 Common Cellar Spider • 22 Checkered Cobweb Weaver • 23 Quasi-social Cobweb Spider • 24 Carolina Wolf Spider • 25 Striped Wolf Spider • 26 Dotted Wolf Spider • 27 Western Lance Spider • 28 Common Nurseryweb Spider • 29 Tufted Nurseryweb Spider • 30 Giant Fishing Spider • 31 Six-spotted Fishing Spider • 32 Garden Ghost Spider Cover Photo: Cherokee Star-bellied Orbweaver ii Eastern Funnelweb Spider • 33 Eastern and Western Parson Spiders • 34 Garden Ghost Spider • 35 Bark Crab Spider • 36 Prairie Crab Spider • 37 Texas Crab Spider • 38 Black-banded Crab Spider • 39 Ridge-faced Flower Spider • 40 Striped Lynx Spider • 41 Black-banded Common and Convict Zebra Spiders • 42 Crab Spider Dimorphic Jumping Spider • 43 Bold Jumping Spider • 44 Apache Jumping Spider • 45 Prairie Jumping Spider • 46 Emerald Jumping Spider • 47 Bark Jumping Spider • 48 Puritan Pirate Spider • 49 Eastern and Four-lined Pirate Spiders • 50 Orchard Spider • 51 Castleback Orbweaver • 52 Triangulate Orbweaver • 53 Common & Cherokee Star-bellied Orbweavers • 54 Black & Yellow Garden Spider • 55 Banded Garden Spider • 56 Marbled Orbweaver • 57 Eastern Arboreal Orbweaver • 58 Western Arboreal Orbweaver • 59 Furrow Orbweaver • 60 Eastern Labyrinth Orbweaver • 61 Giant Long-jawed Orbweaver • 62 Silver Long-jawed Orbweaver • 63 Bowl and Doily Spider • 64 Filmy Dome Spider • 66 References • 67 Pocket Guides • 68-69 1 Introduction This is a guide to the most common spiders found in Kansas.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations of a Semi-Aquatic Spider Attack: an Overlooked Fish Predator in A
    Observations of a Semi-Aquatic Spider Attack: An Overlooked Fish Predator in a Well Studied Ecosystem? Amy E. Deacon, Aidan D. Farrell and Douglas F. Fraser Deacon, A. E., Farrell, A. D., and Fraser, D. F. 2015. Observations of a Semi-Aquatic Spider Attack: An Overlooked Fish Predator in a Well Studied Ecosystem? Living World, Journal of The Trinidad and Tobago Field Naturalists’ Club , 2015, 57-59. NATURE NOTES OEVHUYDWLRQ RI D SHPLATXDWLF SSLGHU AWWDFN AQ OYHUORRNHG )LVK 3UHGDWRU LQ D Well-Studied Ecosystem? We describe here a noteworthy spider encounter that Nyffeler and Pusey (2014) reviewed accounts of took place on the bank of the Ramdeen Stream in Trin- VSLGHU SUHGDWLRQ RQ ¿VK ZRUOGZLGH E\ FROODWLQJ SXE- LGDG¶V $ULPD 9DOOH\ ¶´1 ¶´: RQ lished and anecdotal reports. According to this paper, the August, 2014. This stream forms part of one of the most VLJKWLQJ GHVFULEHG KHUH LV WKH ¿UVW UHFRUGHG LQFLGHQFH RI intensively-studied freshwater ecosystems in the tropics; ¿VK SUHGDWLRQ E\ D VSLGHU LQ 7ULQLGDG 7KLV LV PRVW OLNHO\ for more than four decades international researchers have because few people have witnessed the event, and/or that been visiting this valley to discover more about the ecology previous descriptions have remained unpublished rather DQG HYROXWLRQ RI WKH ¿VKHV WKDW LW VXSSRUWV ± SULPDULO\ WKH WKDQ UHÀHFWLQJ WKH DFWXDO UDULW\ RI ¿VK SUHGDWLRQ E\ VSLGHUV Trinidadian guppy Poecilia reticulata DQG WKH NLOOL¿VK The pools in this case are manmade, but mimic pools Rivulus hartii (recently revised as Anablepsoides hartii). that are often found in such habitats and are naturally col- This unrivalled body of research has greatly expanded our RQLVHG E\ ULYXOXV 2YHU WKH FRXUVH RI SRRO YLVLWV E\ WKH understanding of natural selection, evolution and commu- DXWKRUV RYHU WZR \HDUV ¿VKLQJ VSLGHUV ZHUH REVHUYHG LQ nity ecology (Magurran 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Pompilidae (Insecta: Hymenoptera). Fauna of New Zealand 12, 160 Pp. Harris, A. C. 1987
    Fauna of New Zealand Eioia Aisoy Gou Memes a Eomoogy iisio eame o Scieiic a Iusia eseac Mou Ae eseac Cee iae ag Aucka ew eaa E oicio ieco - M ogwo Gou eae Sysemaics Secio - G W amsay Co-opted from within Systematics Section K Cosy A ooway Uiesiies eeseaie G W Gis ooogy eame icoia Uiesiy o Weigo iae ag Weigo ew eaa Museums eeseaie C Yawy ieco aioa Museum o ew eaa iae ag Weigo ew eaa Oeseas eeseaie awece CSIO iisio o Eomoogy O o 17 Caea Ciy AC 1 Ausaia o a oaioa asis —s— Seies Eio M C ua Sysemaics Secio Eomoogy iisio eame o Scieiic a Iusia eseac Mou Ae eseac Cee iae ag Aucka ew eaa aua o ew eaa ume 1 omiiae (Iseca ymeoea Α C ais Oago Museum Gea Kig See uei ew eaa Cataloguing-in-publication citation AIS A C omiiae (Iseca ymeoea / A C ais - Weigo SI Sciece Iomaio uisig Cee 197 (aua o ew eaa ISS 111-533; o 1 IS -77-51-3 I ie Η Seies UC 595793 Date of publication: see back cover of subsequent numbers Suggested form of citation ais A C 197 omiiae (Iseca ymeoea Fauna of New Zealand [no.] 12. is uicaio was ouce y ose iogay e auos ye- sci was ascie y OC scaig o o e ocesso iskee a ae eiig a sye coig was ooyese a e ΝΖ Goe- me iig Oice imes ew oma ye is use o mos o e e; mao eaigs a igue aes ae se i Uies; Gaamo a Geea ae use i e ies e Eioia Aisoy Gou a e Seies Eio ackowege e oowig co-oeaio DSIR Research Orchard, Havelock North: Ms Cocko - assisace wi wo ocesso iu Mount Albert Research Centre, DSIR: Ms aig - asciio o e M W emoe - assisace wi awok M ΜΒ Iwi - ooeucio ο ie igues Ms ΗΑ Wea - comue ie maageme Science Information Publishing Centre, DSIR: awco - sueisio o oucio a isiuio M C Maews - assisace wi oucio a uiciy Science Mapping Unit, DSIR: M Saage - assisace wi awok Front cover: e isec eice is Sphictostethus nitidus (aicius [] aggig a ey sie Miturga frenata Koc © Cow Coyig uise y Sciece Iomaio uisig Cee SI O o 971 Weigo ew eaa : Φ I 4 Φ • $4 Φ • • 4 oisiece Priocnemis (Τ monachus i-isa aa o is os Cantuaria allani.
    [Show full text]
  • Schwartz Et Al. 2016
    Report Males Can Benefit from Sexual Cannibalism Facilitated by Self-Sacrifice Highlights Authors d Male self-sacrifice behavior is adaptive in the dark fishing Steven K. Schwartz, spider William E. Wagner, Jr., Eileen A. Hebets d Postcopulatory sexual cannibalism results in fecundity Correspondence benefits for both sexes [email protected] d Cannibalized males benefit via increased offspring number, size, and survivorship In Brief Schwartz et al. show that obligate male d Benefits result from the consumption of the male, not from an death and subsequent sexual alternative prey item cannibalism in the dark fishing spider, Dolomedes tenebrosus, result in large and significant increases in the number, size, and survivorship of offspring. This empirical study provides support for the hypothesis that self-sacrifice behavior is adaptive via paternal effort. Schwartz et al., 2016, Current Biology 26, 2794–2799 October 24, 2016 ª 2016 Elsevier Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.010 Current Biology Report Males Can Benefit from Sexual Cannibalism Facilitated by Self-Sacrifice Steven K. Schwartz,1,2,3,* William E. Wagner, Jr.,1 and Eileen A. Hebets1 1School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA 2Department of Biology, Gonzaga University, Spokane, WA 99258, USA 3Lead Contact *Correspondence: [email protected] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.010 SUMMARY gate these costs [6]. While less commonly studied, female reproductive traits can impose costs on males, like the killing In a number of species, males are cannibalized by and consumption of males during reproductive interactions. females after mating (reviewed in [1, 2]), and some Such sexual cannibalism, which can occur prior to or following males actually appear to facilitate their own canni- copulation, is rare within most animal groups, but in some balism (reviewed in [3]).
    [Show full text]
  • Huron River Report – Winter 2004
    Huron River Report The Newsletter of the Huron River Watershed Council Winter 2004 Argo Dam Removal p 5 Streamside Hunters Natural Areas Map p 10 Fishing spiders stalk, skate, and dive for prey Site Design Fact Sheets p 9 Perhaps you’ve noticed one lying in wait guished by the arrangement of their eyes. along the bank of your local creek, on rocks Fishing spiders have eight eyes arranged in or vegetation, or maybe you’ve been lucky two rows of four each, while wolf spiders’ enough to watch one dancing across the eight eyes are arranged in three rows, with water’s surface. But most likely you’ve the two in the middle row being much never really noticed them at all. larger. Fishing spiders also frequent aquatic and riparian habitats, while wolf spiders are Fishing spiders are found throughout the more typically found in uplands. Huron River watershed. At least three species, all of the genus Dolomedes, have Fishing spiders, like wolf spiders, are been collected here. Members of this genus effective daytime predators that do not can be found throughout the continental spin webs to catch prey. They rely on United States and southern Canada. Fishing camouflage and excellent eyesight, waiting The six-spotted fishing spider, Dolomedes spiders can be large (females have a leg patiently for prey to pass their way and triton, sits in wait for aquatic prey. span of up to 3 inches), and therefore a bit swiftly springing upon unsuspecting victims. —photo: Giff Beaton intimidating, but they are harmless. These However, fishing spiders do not limit brown and gray, well-camouflaged spiders themselves to land-based prey.
    [Show full text]
  • The Duration of Copulation in Spiders: Comparative Patterns
    Records of the Western Australian Museum Supplement No. 52: 1-11 (1995). The duration of copulation in spiders: comparative patterns Mark A. Elgar Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia Abstract - The duration of copulation in spiders varies both-within and between species, and in the latter by several orders of magnitude. The sources of this variation are explored in comparative analyses of the duration of copulation and other life-history variables of 135 species of spiders from 26 families. The duration of copulation is correlated with body size within several species, but the pattern is not consistent and more generally there is no inter-specific covariation between these variables. The duration of copulation within orb-weaving spiders is associated with both the location of mating and the frequency of sexual cannibalism, suggesting that the length of copulation is limited by the risk of predation. Finally, entelegyne spiders copulate for longer than haplogyne spiders, a pattern that can be interpreted in terms of male mating strategies or the complexity of their copulatory apparatus. INTRODUCTION after the copulatory organ has been inserted. In It is widely recognised that there are conflicts of species in which females mate with several males, interest between males and females in the choice of copulation may provide the male with the mating partner and the frequency of mating (e.g. opportunity to manipulate the sperm of other Elgar 1992). Thus, while the principal function of males that previously mated with that female. For copulation is to transfer gametes, the act of mating example, copulating male damselflies not only may have several additional functions, such as transfer their own sperm, but also remove the mate assessment or ensuring sperm priority, and sperm of rival males (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Spectacular Spiders
    © Steven Falk Your guide to identifying spiders © Tim Beecher Spectacular spiders Spiders are in many ways the most exciting creatures on earth. Right here in the UK we have spiders that'll dive underwater to catch tadpoles and even small fish, spiders that tend their young in little creches made from silken tents, little wolves that carry their spiderlings around on their backs, even cute jumping spiders that'll bounce around like they're on pogo sticks- and will even show off to you if they think you're a rival! What spiders are NOT is dangerous - I'd love a chance to convince every kid out there that spiders are wonderful before they grow up and inherit their parent's fears!!! Inside: Amazing spider facts Stories from your favourite wildlife presenters www.buglife.org.uk Tel: 01733 201210 @buzz_dont_tweet And much, much more! Buglife - The Invertebrate Conservation Trust is a registered charity at Bug House, Ham Lane, Orton Waterville, Peterborough, PE2 5UU Registered Charity No: 1092293, Scottish Charity No: SC040004, Company No: 4132695 © Stephen Dalton © Greg Hitchcock The female Nursery web spider (Pisaura There are about 650 different species of spider in the UK ranging from tiny money mirabilis) creates a tent-like web for her young - spider the Minute maro (Maro minutus) to the huge Cardinal spider (Tegenaria a nursery web! Her spiderlings are safe inside parietina) with a leg span of more than 10 centimetres. The heaviest spider in their nursery as she stays with them to protect Britain is probably the Four-spot orbweaver (Araneus quadratus) which weighs up them from predators.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMENTARY Physical Gills in Diving Insects and Spiders: Theory and Experiment
    164 The Journal of Experimental Biology 216, 164-170 © 2013. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd doi:10.1242/jeb.070276 COMMENTARY Physical gills in diving insects and spiders: theory and experiment Roger S. Seymour* and Philip G. D. Matthews† Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia *Author for correspondence ([email protected]) †Present address: University of Queensland, Goddard Building 8, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia Summary Insects and spiders rely on gas-filled airways for respiration in air. However, some diving species take a tiny air-store bubble from the surface that acts as a primary O2 source and also as a physical gill to obtain dissolved O2 from the water. After a long history of modelling, recent work with O2-sensitive optodes has tested the models and extended our understanding of physical gill function. Models predict that compressible gas gills can extend dives up to more than eightfold, but this is never reached, because the animals surface long before the bubble is exhausted. Incompressible gas gills are theoretically permanent. However, neither compressible nor incompressible gas gills can support even resting metabolic rate unless the animal is very small, has a low metabolic rate or ventilates the bubbleʼs surface, because the volume of gas required to produce an adequate surface area is too large to permit diving. Diving-bell spiders appear to be the only large aquatic arthropods that can have gas gill surface areas large enough to supply resting metabolic demands in stagnant, oxygenated water, because they suspend a large bubble in a submerged web.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Preference of the Diving Bell Spider Argyroneta Aquatica in a Resurgence of the Po Plain (Northern Italy) (Araneae: Cybaeidae)
    Fragmenta entomologica, 48 (1): 9-16 (2016) eISSN: 2284-4880 (online version) pISSN: 0429-288X (print version) Research article Submitted: February 3rd, 2016 - Accepted: March 16th, 2016 - Published: June 30th, 2016 Ecological preference of the diving bell spider Argyroneta aquatica in a resurgence of the Po plain (Northern Italy) (Araneae: Cybaeidae) Stefano MAMMOLA 1, Riccardo CAVALCANTE 2, Marco ISAIA 1,* 1 Laboratory of Terrestrial Ecosystems, Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Torino - Via Accademia Alber- tina 13, 10123 Torino (TO), Italy - [email protected]; [email protected] 2 Cultural Association Docet Natura, Section Biodiversity - Via del Molino 12, 13046 Livorno Ferraris (VC), Italy - [email protected] * Corresponding author Abstract The diving bell spider Argyroneta aquatica is the only known spider to conduct a wholly aquatic life. For this reason, it has been the object of an array of studies concerning different aspects of its peculiar biology such as reproductive behavior and sexual dimorphism, physiology, genetic and silk. On the other hand, besides some empirical observations, the autoecology of this spider is widely understud- ied. We conducted an ecological study in a resurgence located in the Po Plain (Northern Italy, Province of Vercelli) hosting a relatively rich population of Argyroneta aquatica, aiming at identifying the ecological factors driving its presence at the micro-habitat level. By means of a specific sampling methodology, we acquired distributional data of the spiders in the study area and monitored physical-chem- ical and habitat structure parameters at each plot. We analyzed the data through Bernoulli Generalized Linear Models (GLM). Results pointed out a significant positive effect of the presence of aquatic vegetation in the plot.
    [Show full text]