<<

Automated count

Veronique Stove Clinical biologist Core lab

20 oktober 2013

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 1 Quantitative hematology

Automation in Hematology J. LEHNER, B. GREVE, U. CASSENS Transfus Med Hemother 2007; 34:328-339

The CBC at the Turn of the Millenium: An Overview P. WARD Clin Chem 2000; 46:1215-1220

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 2 First half of the 20th century Exclusively manual techniques

Blood cell counts (red cells, white cells, platelets): appropriately diluted blood samples and a ruled counting chamber (hemocytometer).

Hemoglobin concentration: colorimetrically by the cyanomethemoglobin method.

The hematocrit (packed cell volume): high speed centrifugation of a column of blood, either in a specially designed tube (the Wintrobe tube), or in sealed microcapillary tubes (ie, the "spun" hematocrit, often obtained by fingerstick blood collection).

Microscopic reticulocyte counting: based on supravital staining of cytoplasmic ribosomal RNA

The white differential: by examining and enumerating by class (eg, granulocytes, lymphocytes, monocytes) 100 to 200 individual white blood cells on a suitably stained blood smear. © 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 3 3 First half of the 20th century Calculated indices

HCT (%) x 10 MCV (fL) = ______Maxwell Wintrobe RBC (millions/µL) (1932)

MCH (pg/RBC) = ______HGB (g/dL) x 10 RBC (millions/µL)

MCHC (g/dL) = ______HGB (g/dL) x 100 HCT (%)

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 4 4 Disadvantages of manual cell counting

Laborious

Imprecise (hemocytometer)

Errors in leukocyte differential count: Distributional error Error due to inter-observer variability Statistical error

Total number of cells counted Differential 100 200 500 1000 10 000 3 0-9 1-7 1-5 2-5 2.7-3.3 6 2-13 3-11 4-9 4-8 5.5-6.5 15 8-24 10-21 12-19 12-18 14.6-15.4

40 30-51 33-48 35-45 36-44 39.5-40.5

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 5 5 Wallace COULTER

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 6 6 1956: Coulter impedance measurement

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 7 7 1960s: Multichannel instruments

Anticoagulated whole blood samples were aspirated into the apparatus automatically aliquoted and diluted into RBC and WBC counting chambers (baths) for cell counting and sizing with impedance apertures

into a spectrophotometric for hemoglobin determination using the cyanmethemoglobin method.

calculations of red cell indices were automatically performed.

Towards high throughput, low cost and fast TAT with the ability to produce immediate (STAT) results.

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 8 8 © 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 9 9 1970s: Automated platelet counting Coincidence -> Hydrodynamic focussing improvement of the cell counting apertures  More accurate cell sizing  Reliable and accurate platelet counts.

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 10 10 1970s: Cell counting by light scattering

Diluted blood sample

Hydrodynamic focussing (Sysmex) Pulse amplitude ~ Cell volume

Flow cell

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 11 11 1980s: Three-part differential

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 12 12 Early 1990s: Five-part differentials

PREPARATION Selective lysis of red cells and counting of white cells Special stains

DETECTION Impedance technology Direct current (DC): pulse height ~ cell volume Radiofrequency current (RF): pulse height ~ nuclear size and density Optical system Scattered laser light Fluorescence light

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 13 13 © 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 14 14 Lysis of RBC, PLT and WBC Lysis of RBC and PLT EXCEPT Basophils Perforation of WBC RNA/DNA staining

WBC WBC

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 15 15 Perforation of RBC and WBC RNA/DNA staining

Impedance PLT Immuno PLT

Optical PLT

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 16 16 Advantages of automated cell counters

Excellent analytical performance Closed-tube analysis No inter-observer variability No slide distribution error Eliminate statistical variations Potential of reflex testing Availability of extra parameters e.g. MCV, RDW, Ret-He, … More efficient (> 100 analyses/hour) and cost effective than manual method

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 17 17 Analysers

Cell Dyn® (Abbott)

Coulter® LH 780 and other (Beckman Coulter)

ADVIA® 2120 and other(Siemens Diagnostics)

X-Class Hematology Systems (Sysmex)

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 18 18 Trend: Integrated ‘lavender top’ automation system

ESR analyser Tube sorter Smear-stainer Cell counters

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 19 19 Trends: All in one systems

Microscope Smear-stainer Analysers

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 20 20 Trends: All in one systems

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 21 21 Key to successful use of automation

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 22 Detection of spurious cell counts

Every hematology analyser is Specific condition of patient affected ! Operators must be aware of the Sampling characteristics of their analyser + be able to recognize and conditions circumvent anomalous results Total testing process All suspected spurious cell counts / morphologies should be validated with microscopic examination of slides Technical problems

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 23 23 Spurious counts and spurious results on haematology analysers: a review. Part I: platelets M. ZANDECKI, F. GENEVIEVE, J. GERARD, A. GODON Volume 29, Issue 1, pages 4–20, February 2007

Spurious counts and spurious results on haematology analysers: a review. Part II: white blood cells, red blood cells, haemoglobin, red cell indices and reticulocytes M. ZANDECKI, F. GENEVIEVE, J. GERARD, A. GODON Volume 29, Issue 1, pages 21–41, February 2007

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 24 24 Expert flagging system

Flags to signal poor reliability of quantitative results (e.g. turbidity/Hb interference, WBC abnormal scattergram, PLT clumps, RBC agglutination, …)

Morfology flags (blasts, IG, atypical lymph, RBC fragments, …)

Limit check

Delta check

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 25 25 http://www.islh.org/web/consensus_rules.php

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 26 26 Flowchart

DM96 (CellaVision)

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 27 27 Examples of spurious results

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 28 Spurious increase in MCHC (>36g/dL)

MCHC = HGB x 100 / HCT (%) normal range: 31.9 - 34.9 g/dL

Parameter Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 30MCV min = Plasma 37HCT°C / RBCexchange x 10

WBC 5.02 5.25 6.70 10 3/uL MCH = RBC 0.71 HGB0.90 / RBC x 3.4410 10 6/uL HGB 11.9 11.9 11.6 g/dL HCT 8.6 10.9 36.9 % MCV 121.1 121.1 107.3 fL MCH 167.6 132.2 33.7 pg MCHC 138.4 109.2 31.4 g/dL PLT 195 196 205 10 3/uL

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent Cold agglutinins  RBC aggr 29 29 Spurious increase in MCHC (>36g/dL)

MCHC = HGB x 100 / HCT (%)

Parameter Run 1 Run 2 Plasma exchange WBC 12.07 13.28 10 3/uL RBC 2.47 2.62 10 6/uL HGB 15.9 8.8 g/dL HCT 23.4 24.9 % MCV 94,7 95.0 fL MCH 64.4 33.6 pg MCHC 67.9 35.3 g/dL PLT 519 192 10 3/uL

Hypertriglyceridemia (>2000 mg/dL)

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 30 30 Spurious PLT counts

HEMATOLOGY Screening Red blood cells 4.78 10E6/µL 3.79 - 5.23 Hemoglobin 14.7 g/dL 11.7 - 15.7 Hematocrit 43.7 % 34.9 - 46.9 MCV 91.4 fL 80.5 - 99.7 MCH 30.8 pg/cel 26.6 - 33.8 MCHC 33.6 g/dL RBC 33 - 36 Red cell distribution width 12.6 % 11.1 - 14.2

Platelets - 54 10E3/µL 170 - 394

Thrombocytes - citrate 198 10E3/µL Screening thrombocytes Thrombocyte aggregates

EDTA-dependent pseudothrombocytopenia

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 31 31 Spurious leukocyte counts

Normal Lipids Lysis resistant RBC Nucleated red (Parental nutrition) (HbC, HbS) blood cells (Neonates, Path. circumstances)

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 32 32 Opportunities of automated hematology

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 33 Parameter TAT MCV Delta check (p50 percentile) Chemistry 44 min | Current – Previous result | Coagulation 39 min Average > 5% Hematology 15 min Change in MCV indicates Transfusion Sample mishandling Sample mix-up

Example (93 – 87) / 93 = 7%

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 34 34 Extended parameters

Extended differential count Immature granulocytes (, neonatal sepsis, cancer, …) Nucleated red blood cells (neonates / numerous conditions in adults) Hematopoietic progenitor cells (time to harvest)

RBC and Reticulocyte parameters Immature reticulocyte fraction (IRF) - early index of erythropoeisis Reticulocyte Hemoglobin content (Ret-He) – iron status Hypochromic RBC Microcytic RBC

Platelet parameters Immature platelet fraction (IPF) – early index of thrombopoiesis

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 35 35 Screening formulas

Thalassemia

Index Formula TT Hereditary spherocytosis England and Fraser index (1973) MCV – RBC – 5 x Hb – K (3,4) < 0 Iron status – Iron therapy Mentzer index (1973) MCV / RBC < 13

Srivastava index (1973) MCH / RBC < 3,8 Shine and Lal index (1977) MCV ² x MCH x 0.01 < 1530 RDW index (1987) MCV x RDW / RBC < 220 Ricerca index (1987) RDW / RBC < 3,3 Green and King index (1988) MCV ² x RDW / (100 x Hb) <72 Ehsani index (2005) MCV – 10 x RBC < 15 Sirdah et al.’s index (2007) MCV – RBC – 3 x Hb < 27

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 36 36 Screening formulas

Thalassemia

Hereditary spherocytosis Mullier et al., Annals of hematology (2011); 90:759-768. Persijn et al., Annals of hematology (2011)

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 37 37 Conclusion

Essential role of automation in the modern hematology laboratory

Microscopic control of pathologic samples remains indispensable

Of major importance for correct interpretation of results: Knowledge of the limits of your specific analyser

© 2008 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent 38 38