DOCSLIB.ORG

The Domino Effect: How Serious Is the Shuttle Delay and What Harm Can It Cause?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Domino Effect: How Serious Is the Shuttle Delay and What Harm Can It Cause? The Domino Effect: How Serious Is The Shuttle Delay and What Harm Can It Cause? By James Oberg t wasn’t officially a “grounding,” but two days after a glorious or “three months,” and rarely included any dates within this calendar “return to flight” on July 26, officials said NASA’s space shuttle year. Optimists hope that a new mission could be mounted early in I fleet would not fly again until the vehicle’s persistent foam-shed- 2006, although the middle of the year seemed more likely to them. ding faults were fixed. At least two significant fragments of insulation That’s a delay of 10 to 12 months or perhaps more. had torn off during launch, and a smaller piece had veered so close to Investigators will be using this time to dissect another exist- the right wing that it might well have scraped it. ing external tank (per- Within the shuttle program, space workers were generally haps the one originally resigned to redouble their efforts to complete the safety upgrades slated for STS-114) to that would reduce flight hazards to a tolerable level. But other emo- examine the true state tions were mixed in to varying degrees. There was a lot of startled of the bonds holding gloom, for some to the extent of dusting off professional résumés. insulating foam onto the There was some helpless anger—most of them had done their jobs metal hull. Few perfectly, but some of their teammates had apparently let the home observers, even dedicat- team down. (There was even some gung-ho flamboyance: claims that ed space buffs, realize all it would take was glue and baling wire to get the spaceship cleared that most of the insula- to fly again.) tion on the tanks that At press conferences, shuttle program manager Bill were shipped to Florida Parsons was repeatedly interrogated about the possible time frame of were installed in the the predicted delays. He refused (properly) to make any quantitative year prior to the reply, but at one point remarked that the delay “might be one month, Columbia disaster, and it might be three months,” but didn’t speculate anything longer than do not reflect any that. “redesigned tank” at all. NASA Administrator Mike Griffin spoke to newsmen four Once a diagno- days into Discovery’s mission and refused to take either the sis is reached, a variety September of November launch windows off the table. But at another of treatments must be press event that same day, Richard Covey, co-leader of the team that developed and tested. assessed NASA’s compliance with the recommendations of the Sample applications will Columbia Accident Investigation Board, said he saw the need for more be made on test-beds, fundamental research into “the phenomenon and the physics” of foam which will be subjected lost in order to better understand the theoretical basis of the shedding to rigorous environmen- Return to Fright: Gaps in problem. Such a research program, perhaps involving complex wind tal conditions, before the insulation foam on tunnel and aircraft flight tests, could take a significant time. However, being dissected again. Discovery’s external tank Covey added he did not think it would be anything like the gap between Whichever process is show foam loss from the Columbia and the recent RTF. ultimately selected—STS- tank’s Protuberance Air Load Sadly, past delays in solving engineering problems that had 114’s tank has different (PAL) Ramp. A foam impact led grounded the fleet turned out to be significantly longer than initially areas where failures to the destruction of the expected. The first flight on April 12, 1981, was more than two years indicate the need for Columbia shuttle during re- late. Even after Challenger was lost in January 1986, and then new but different techni- entry on February 1, 2003. Columbia in February 2003, shuttle managers initially believed they cal solutions—must then Image Credit: NASA would be flying again within four months. Yet both times, it took about be implemented in a two and a half years to get off the ground again. process under strict There was an additional scheduling flaw that may cast light control. Only then will a on today’s problem. In both cases, during the time the fleet was flight-ready external tank be available for shipment to Florida in prepa- grounded, managers kept believing—and acting on—the idea that they ration for a new shuttle launch. would resume operations within six to eight months. This delusion led There’s probably no “pixie dust” solution that will make the them to reject many serious repair and upgrade proposals that would tanks currently in Florida suddenly acceptable through piecemeal local have been very effective but would have needed more than 12 months surgery. Even transportation efforts alone will take months. Any sug- to implement. Convinced there wasn’t enough time remaining before gestion to simply “jury rig” existing foamed tanks will be greeted with the next launch, management regularly turned down such recommen- the extreme skepticism it deserves. dations. But the notion that the next shuttle mission, STS-121 by Armed with 60/60 hindsight, and with the experience of Atlantis, will not occur in this calendar year is sending ripples through- seeing how long the last effort took to redesign and re-verify the shut- out the International Space Station (ISS) program, Washington- tle’s fuel tank, I’ve collected the “best guesses” from space program Moscow diplomacy circles and the science community as the future of veterans. The range of their estimates doesn’t suggest “one month” the faltering Hubble Space Telescope becomes ever more in doubt. 16 A flawless Discovery mission was always expected to be crit- purely cash-and-carry basis. But NASA is forbidden by law to buy any ical for the ISS. Spare parts and crew supplies had been running short, such goods and services from Moscow. and the list of important repair work had grown long. With the NASA had developed a plan to dodge this problem by trans- prospect of a longer-than-expected hiatus until the next mission, the porting all its future space station crewmembers aboard shuttles. crew squeezed out extra equipment and supplies from the shuttle to McArthur himself was slated for a shuttle return a month after the further restock the station. Soyuz he launches on returns next April (a scheme that would have The planned second mission is officially designated ULF 1.1, given him the American mission duration record). The Russians would which stands for the “utilization and logistics flight” that was belatedly still keep “emergency bailout seats” available to U.S. station astronauts inserted between the scheduled UF-1 and UF-2 missions. Like STS- on a barter basis with occasional Russian rides on space shuttles, but 114, it had a pressurized cargo module installed in the payload bay. would not carry any Americans up or down under ordinary conditions. That module was to carry more supplies and spare parts, along with Those deals, or course, are voided by a substantial new shut- several complex equipment racks for the U.S. Laboratory Module. tle delay. Instead, NASA will need supplemental appropriations to buy The “second wind” that STS-114 provides to the station the space transportation services, and it will need congressional clear- should be able, with continuing supplements from Russian robot sup- ance to evade the legal constraints that forbid such payments. Officials ply ships, to carry the station well into 2006. Sometime in that time have known about this impending crisis for years but had developed frame, the first flight of elaborate schemes to dodge it—schemes that are no longer workable. the European robot Another fatally wounded scheme that had until now merely transport craft (the ATV, been dying would be the 28-mission manifest for the last five years of for “Automated Transfer the shuttle program. Slated for retirement for safety reasons by Vehicle”) should occur— 2010, the shuttle fleet is also supposed to complete station assem- and just in time. bly—at least to the point that expendable rockets and foreign space As with the Russian vehicles can keep the station functioning until a new generation of supply ships, the ATV American space transportation tools come on-line. can carry only equip- With the clock ticking through months and months of no ment that can be shuttle missions, and the adamantine drop-dead date of 2010 loom- passed through the 30” ing guillotine-like on the horizon, we will most likely see more and more tunnel from the docking of the major elements of the station shift to expendable rockets. The port on the end of the Russians are developing a space-to-space tug called “Parom,” assem- Service Module. bled from off-the-shelf spacecraft components that will be able to dock Currently, the cargo on to station-bound payloads in parking orbits and haul them up to the the first ATV (code- station, but for a fee. It may be a bargain. named Jules Verne) is Parom is a Soyuz-sized ”flying tunnel,” with docking mecha- focused on enhancing nisms and rendezvous sensors at both ends. Based at the space sta- the scientific capability of tion, it would await the launching of large components or cargo canis- the station. But if the ters into low, parking orbits. Parom would also arrange to dock with shuttle launch delay Progress tankers, or with propellant supplies launched inside some of extends into 2006, the the cargo modules, to top off its own tanks as needed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2008 60 Pages 3.8 MB
    Illustrations Key: Five of the most interesting articles this publica- tion year, (see the five illustrations at right) were on: • The Concept of “World” from flat to round to the realm of human activity “wherever” • “Assuring Mental Health among Future Lunar Pioneers” • “Railroading on Mars” • “Bursting Apollo’s Envelope” and • The Moon’s Remarkable “Alpine Valley.” Other articles of note include: • “Thinking Outside the Mass Fraction Box” (we have handicapped our options for space transpor- tation because of slavery to an unexamined assum- ption dating from Penemunde! • MMM’s “Platform for Mars 2.0” and other articles on Mars in our annual “March is for Mars” theme issue • Aspects of an Early Lunar Community • Taking the Green Movement to the Moon (several articles); • Hewn Basalt Products • Saddlebag Shielding for Vertical Habitats • Shadow Pioneers (Earthbound teleoperators) • Distance limits to tele-conversation • Does it rally take more fuel to land on the Moon than on Mars as Robert Zubrin claims? • A major article series by Dave Dietzler focuses on “LUNAR ENTERPRISE & OPPORTUNITY Parts 1-4 • The “Mother Earth & Father Sky” article touched again on the green themes. • Gordon Haverland contributed a critique on the options for “Engineering on the Moon and Beyond with local materials. • The tragedy of discarding of External Tanks, was touched on again: something MMM has opposed from the very beginning. In Addition There were a number of Book Reviews We do not preplan the article spread in any publication year. Some topics are revisited more often than others. It all depends on the inspirations of the contributing authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Spaceplanes from Airport to Sp
    Spaceplanes Matthew A. Bentley Spaceplanes From Airport to Spaceport Matthew A. Bentley Rock River WY, USA ISBN: 978-0-387-76509-9 e-ISBN: 978-0-387-76510-5 DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-76510-5 Library of Congress Control Number: 2008939140 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009 All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights. Printed on acid-free paper springer.com This book is dedicated to the interna- tional crews of the world’s first two operational spaceplanes, Columbia and Challenger, who bravely gave their lives in the quest for new knowledge. Challenger Francis R. Scobee Michael J. Smith Ellison S. Onizuka Ronald E. McNair Judith A. Resnik S. Christa McAuliffe Gregory B. Jarvis Columbia Richard D. Husband William C. McCool Michael P. Anderson Ilan Ramon Kalpana Chawla David M. Brown Laurel Clark Contents Preface. xi 1 Rocketplanes at the Airport . 1 The Wright Flyer. 2 Rocket Men.
    [Show full text]
  • Constellation Services International Space
    NONREIMBURSABLE SPACE ACT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTELLATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION CAPABILITIES BACKGROUND The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has established the Commercial Crew & Cargo Program Office at the Johnson Space Center (JSC) as part of the Exploration Systems Mission Directorate. The objectives of the Commercial Crew/Cargo Program are to: • implement U.S. Space Exploration policy with an investment to stimulate commercial enterprises in space, • facilitate U.S. private industry demonstration of cargo and crew space transportation capabilities with the goal of achieving reliable, cost effective access to low-Earth orbit, and • create a market environment in which commercial space transportation services are available to Government and private sector customers. Under this program, NASA is entering into agreements with private industry to develop and demonstrate the vehicles, systems, and operations needed to resupply, return cargo from, and transport crew to and from a human space facility, with the International Space Station providing the representative requirements for such a facility. Once demonstrated, industry will be able to provide these new services to non-NASA customers. NASA also plans to enter the next phase of the Commercial Crew & Cargo Program and purchase services from commercial providers to support the International Space Station. This Agreement represents the signatories' commitment to meet these goals. Specifically, the approach of Constellation Services International, Inc. to meet these goals is outlined in Appendix 2. Page 1 of 27 . ARTICLE 1. AUTHORITY This Agreement is entered into by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, located at 300 E Street, SW, Washington, DC 20546 (hereinafter referred to as "NASA"), and Constellation Services International, Inc.,., (hereinafter referred to as "CSI" or "PARTICIPANT") with a place of business at 2313 Via Puerta, Suite B, Laguna Woods, CA 92637.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocket Science: Wings Added
    Spaceplanes Matthew A. Bentley Spaceplanes From Airport to Spaceport Matthew A. Bentley Rock River WY, USA ISBN: 978-0-387-76509-9 e-ISBN: 978-0-387-76510-5 DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-76510-5 Library of Congress Control Number: 2008939140 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009 All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights. Printed on acid-free paper springer.com This book is dedicated to the interna- tional crews of the world’s first two operational spaceplanes, Columbia and Challenger, who bravely gave their lives in the quest for new knowledge. Challenger Francis R. Scobee Michael J. Smith Ellison S. Onizuka Ronald E. McNair Judith A. Resnik S. Christa McAuliffe Gregory B. Jarvis Columbia Richard D. Husband William C. McCool Michael P. Anderson Ilan Ramon Kalpana Chawla David M. Brown Laurel Clark Contents Preface. xi 1 Rocketplanes at the Airport . 1 The Wright Flyer. 2 Rocket Men.
    [Show full text]
  • 5139316465E159fb4bcd5f58918
    1 www.onlineeducation.bharatsevaksamaj.net www.bssskillmission.in “Space Flight Dynamics”. In Section 1 of this course you will cover these topics: Introduction Two-Body Orbital Mechanics Topic : Introduction Topic Objective: At the end of this topic student would be able to: Spaceflight History Reentry and landing/splashdown Reentry Landing Recovery Expendable launch systems Reusable WWW.BSSVE.INlaunch systems Space disasters Space weather Environmental considerations Spacecraft Human spaceflight Weightlessness Radiation Interplanetary spaceflight Life support Interstellar spaceflight www.bsscommunitycollege.in www.bssnewgeneration.in www.bsslifeskillscollege.in 2 www.onlineeducation.bharatsevaksamaj.net www.bssskillmission.in Intergalactic spaceflight Astrodynamics Spacecraft propulsion Costs, market and uses of spaceflight Definition/Overview: Spaceflight: Spaceflight is the use of space technology to achieve the flight of spacecraft into and through outer space. Key Points: 1. Spaceflight Spaceflight is the use of space technology to achieve the flight of spacecraft into and through outer space. WWW.BSSVE.IN Spaceflight is used in space exploration, and also in commercial activities like space tourism and satellite telecommunications. Additional non-commercial uses of spaceflight include space observatories, reconnaissance satellites and other earth observation satellites. A spaceflight typically begins with a rocket launch, which provides the initial thrust to overcome the force of gravity and propels the spacecraft from the surface of the Earth. Once in space, the motion of a spacecraft -- both when unpropelled and when under propulsion -- is covered by the area of study called astrodynamics. Some spacecraft remain in space indefinitely, some disintegrate during atmospheric reentry, and others reach a planetary or lunar surface for landing or impact. www.bsscommunitycollege.in www.bssnewgeneration.in www.bsslifeskillscollege.in 3 www.onlineeducation.bharatsevaksamaj.net www.bssskillmission.in 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Day 3 Report Outs, Summaries (5.6 Mb PDF)
    Human Exploration Objectives, Strategy, and Architecture Objective: To understand individual national strategies, perspectives, interests and plans for space exploration Earth is the cradle of humanity, but one cannot live in the cradle forever. K. Tsislovsky November 18, 2004 Tom Cremins Doug Cooke 2 Human Exploration Strategy, Objectives, and Architecture Session Participants: E. Janardhana ISRO Sam Scimemi NASA Karsten Beneke DLR Arlene Ammar CNES *Akira Kosaka JAXA *Dietrich Vennemann ESA Kiyoshi Higuchi JAXA Ersilia Vaudo Scarpetta ESA Hae-Jim Choi KARI Thomas Stafford Stafford Task Force/Joint Commission Kent Joosten NASA Wendell Mendell NASA Carlo Bonifazi ASI Joe H. Engle Stafford Task Brenda Ward NASA Force/Joint Commission *Tom Cremins NASA *Nikolai A. Anfimov FKA *Doug Cooke NASA *Alain Berinstain CSA Andrea Lorenzoni ASI Vasili Lukyashenko FKA Louis L. Grenier CSA Lisa Guerra NASA *Moises M. Fernandez INTA Chris Giulietti NASA *Presenter 3 Flow Down from Vision Human Exploration Strategy, Objectives, and Architecture The Vision for U.S. Space Exploration THE FUNDAMENTAL GOAL OF THIS VISION IS TO ADVANCE U.S. SCIENTIFIC, SECURITY, AND ECONOMIC INTEREST THROUGH A ROBUST SPACE EXPLORATION PROGRAM Implement a sustained and affordable human and robotic program to explore the solar system and be yond Extend human presence across the solar system , starting with a human return to the Moon by the year 2020, in preparation for human exploration of Mars and other destinations; Develop the innovative technologies, knowledge, and infrastructures both to explore and to support de cis ions about the destinations for hum an exploration; and Promote international and commercial participation in exploration to further U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights in Space 2007
    International Astronautical Federation International Institute of Space Law 8-10 rue Mario Nikis 8-10 rue Mario Nikis UNITED NATIONS 75735 Paris, Cedex 15, France 75735 Paris, Cedex 15, France Tel: +33 1 45 67 42 60 Fax: +33 1 42 73 21 20 Tel: +33 1 45 67 42 60 Fax: +33 1 42 73 21 20 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS Website: www.iafastro.com Website: www.iafastro-iisl.com Highlights in Space 2007 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation and the International Institute of Space Law The United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (OOSA) is responsible for promoting international cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space and assisting developing countries in using space science and technology. United Nations publication ISBN: 978-92-1-101161-6 United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs Sales No. E.08.I.7 P.O. Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: (+43-1) 26060-4950, Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5830 ST/SPACE/37 E-mail: [email protected] V.07-88046—January 2008—890 Website: www.unoosa.org UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS UNITED NATIONS OFFICE AT VIENNA Highlights in Space 2007 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation and the International Institute of Space Law Progress in space science, technology and applications, international cooperation and space law UNITED NATIONS New York, 2008 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No.: E.08.I.7 ISBN 978-92-1-101161-6 ST/SPACE/37 This document has not been formally edited.
    [Show full text]