DOCSLIB.ORG

Consultation Process

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Chapter 8 – Consultation Process 407 TRANSITWAY – WEST OF HURONTARIO STREET TO EAST OF HIGHWAY 400 MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION - CENTRAL REGION TABLE OF CONTENTS 8. CONSULTATION PROCESS 8-1 8.1. Overview 8-1 8.2. Consultation with Agencies 8-1 8.3. Summary of Agency Consultation Activities 8-2 8.3.1. Technical Advisory/Resource Group (TRG) 8-32 8.3.2. Consultation with Aboriginal Communities 8-104 8.4. Consultation with the Public and Landowners 8-108 8.4.1. Public Notification 8-109 8.4.2. Notification to Landowners in Close Vicinity of the Transitway 8-109 8.4.3. Public Information Centres (PIC) 8-110 8-0 8. CONSULTATION PROCESS Communities. 8.2. Consultation with Agencies 8.1. Overview Notification and consultation were carried out to encourage the involvement of government review Consultation is an integral component of the TPAP process and essential to the successful completion agencies, technical agencies (i.e. transit authorities, utility companies, emergency medical services of this study. Consultation was undertaken throughout the study to assist in the planning and impact (EMS), etc.), municipal staff and elected officials throughout the stages of this study. Agencies were assessment process for the 407 Transitway. The consultation process was designed to meet the invited to participate in the PICs and focused meetings to address specific concerns and technical requirements of Ontario Regulation 231/08, Transit Projects and Metrolinx Undertakings. Consultation requirements. was initiated from October to December 2015, well before the formal declaration of the TPAP, through the mailing of initial contact letters to stakeholders and lndigenous and Métis Communities, and the Agencies were notified of the Pre-TPAP study commencement by the distribution of an initial contact initiation of the project website. The TPAP 120-day consultation and documentation period for this letter mailed in October and December 2015. A few agencies responded that, after review of the study, project was initiated on April 25, 2018. there were no concerns and/or interests within the study area, and they requested to be removed from the contact list. Consultation was conducted with government review agencies, technical agencies, local municipalities, elected officials, the general public, landowners and lndigenous and Métis Communities. Agencies were invited to attend the two rounds of PICs: PIC #1 was held on December 6 and December 8, 2016 and PIC#2 was held on January 23 and January 25, 2018. PIC invitation letters were mailed on The consultation process included the following types of consultation activities: November 18, 2016 and January 5, 2018, for PIC #1 and #2 respectively. The Draft EPR was made . Public notices; available to members of the TRG on December 15, 2017 for review and comment. A letter was also . Liaison with relevant agencies, members of the public and landowners (residents were notified mailed to advise agencies of the formal Notice of Commencement of TPAP 120-day consultation and beyond the required 30 m of the project limits); documentation period on April 17, 2018. In addition, a letter of notification was provided to inform . Liaison with lndigenous and Métis Communities; agencies of the Notice of Completion of Environmental Project Report (EPR) concurrently (in August 2018) with the release of this EPR. Public Information Centres (PICs); and, . Project website. The following is a list of agencies that were invited to participate in the consultation process: At the outset of the study (during the Pre-TPAP phase), the project team developed a detailed Consultation Plan. The purpose of the plan was to identify the proposed frequency and timing of consultation activities, methods of notification, and key stakeholders. The plan included details regarding the following consultation activities: . Public notices; . Consultation/negotiation with external agencies, lndigenous and Métis Communities, and property owners and the public, . PICs; . Presentations to Municipal Councils; . Technical Advisory/Resource Group (TRG) and Steering Committee; . Project website; and, . Submission of the Environmental Project Report. The Consultation Plan also included preliminary letters to external agencies and lndigenous and Métis communities as well as a preliminary external agency mailing list, which was updated regularly throughout the project. Also included in the plan was the initial contact letter to lndigenous and Métis 8-1 Canadian Transportation Agency City of Brampton; 8.3. Summary of Agency Consultation Activities Transport Canada (Ontario Region) and Rail Safety Office; City of Mississauga; Greater Toronto Airport Authority; City of Toronto; Table 8.1 presents a summary of agency correspondence/meetings held during the TPAP. The original Canadian National Railway; York Regional Police; correspondence received from agencies is presented in Appendix A. See Section 8.3.1 and Table 8.2 Canadian Pacific Railway; York Region Public Health Services; for the comments received from TRG members on the Draft EPR. Health Canada; City of Vaughan Fire; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Peel Regional Police; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Peel Regional Paramedic Services; Ministry of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation; City of Brampton Fire; Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport; Mississauga Fire; Ministry of Municipal Affairs/Ministry of Housing; Toronto Fire Services, West Command; Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs; Toronto Paramedic Services; Infrastructure Ontario/Ministry of Economic Development, Toronto Police Service; Job Creation and Trade; Ontario Provincial Police; Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks; Peel Region, Waste Management, Infrastructure Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Development; Toronto and Region Conservation Authority; MPs; Credit Valley Conservation; MPPs; Ontario Nature; Conseil scolaire Viamonde; Etobicoke Historical Society; Conseil scolaire de district catholique Centre-Sud; Brampton Board of Trade; York Catholic District School Board; Metrolinx/Hurontario LRT (HuLRT)/GO Transit/AECOM; York Region District School Board; York Region Rapid Transit Corporation; Peel Region District School Board; York Region Transit/VIVA; Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board; Brampton Transit (Zum); Toronto District School Board; Mississauga Rapid Transit (MiWay); Toronto Catholic District School Board; Toronto Transit Commission; Hydro One Networks Inc.; Highway 407 ETR Consortium/407 ETR Concession Enbridge Pipe Line; Company Limited; Rogers Cable; York Region; Bell Canada/Telecon; Peel Region; Power Stream Inc.; City of Vaughan; Allstream; and, FSM Management Group Inc. Agency communications were undertaken as required to identify and resolve any environmental or design issues associated with the project. Consultation consisted of discussions, meetings, correspondence and/or presentations to external committees, government review agencies/ministries, technical agencies, local municipalities, elected officials and interest groups. Environmental approvals- in-principle were requested in writing from external agencies, where required. 8-2 TABLE 8.1: SUMMARY OF CONTACTS WITH EXTERNAL AGENCIES/STAKEHOLDERS DURING TPAP AGENCY DATE CONTACTED COMMENTS/CONCERNS ACTION TAKEN M.P.s M.P. Brampton South Initial contact letters sent on December 9, 2015. A letter dated December 15, 2015 and the comment form were received from the No issues or concerns identified. M.P. for Thornhill noting that he has no concerns about the study at this time, but M.P. Brampton Centre PIC #1 invitation letters sent on November 18, wishes to remain informed about the study’s progress. All M.P.s were kept informed throughout the study. 2016. M.P. Brampton East An email was received from the M.P. for Mississauga-Malton on December 6, 2016 An email response was sent on February 21, 2016 to the M.P. for Mississauga- PIC #2 invitation letters sent on January 5, 2018. noting that the Minister will be unable to attend PIC #1 due to a prior commitment, Malton providing a link to the project website and the panels/information presented M.P. Mississauga - Malton but requesting to be kept informed for future events. at PIC #1, and confirming that the M.P will be kept informed as the project TPAP commencement notification letters sent on progresses. M.P. Vaughan – Woodbridge April 17, 2018. M.P. Thornhill TPAP completion notification letters were sent concurrently with the release of this EPR. M.P. Etobicoke – North M.P. Humber River – Black Creek M.P.P.s M.P.P. Brampton South Initial contact letters sent on December 9, 2015. The comment form was received via fax on December 14, 2015 from the M.P.P. for No issues or concerns identified. York-West noting that the M.P.P. has no concerns about the study at this time, but M.P.P. Brampton Centre PIC #1 invitation letters sent on November 18, wishes to remain informed about the study’s progress. All M.P.P.s were kept informed throughout the study. 2016. M.P.P. Brampton East PIC #2 invitation letters sent on January 5, 2018. M.P.P. Mississauga - Malton TPAP commencement notification letters sent on M.P.P. Vaughan-Woodbridge (sent TPAP commencement and TPAP April 17, 2018 (and April 25, 2018 to the M.P.P. completion notification letters only as formerly Minister of Vaughan). Transportation) TPAP completion notification letters were sent M.P.P. Thornhill concurrently with the release of this EPR. M.P.P. Etobicoke – North M.P.P. Humber River –Black Creek NOTE: Prior to reorganization
Recommended publications
  • Curriculum Vitae

    Curriculum Vitae

    Cole Swanson | Curriculum Vitae Education University of Toronto Masters of Art, Art History 2013 University of Guelph Bachelor of Arts, Honours: Studio Art 2004 Solo & Dual Exhibitions Spadina House Museum, Toronto Research Project and Solo Exhibition – TBA (forthcoming) 2020 Hamilton Artist Inc, Cannon Gallery, Hamilton Devil’s Colony (forthcoming) 2019 Rajasthan Lalit Kala Academy, Jaipur The Furrow, The Froth 2018 The Open Space Society, Jaipur िमटटी िसटी | Mitti City 2018 Unilever Factory & Design Exchange, Toronto Muzzle and Hoof, Horn and Bone 2017 Expo for Design, Innovation, and Technology Casa Na Ilha, Ilhabela, Brazil Lecanora Muralis 2017 Art Gallery of Guelph, Guelph Out of the Strong, Something Sweet 2016 Jawahar Kala Kendra, Jaipur, India Red Earth 2014 Museum of Northern History, Kirkland Lake Monuments & Melodramas 2012 Le Gallery, Toronto Next Exit (with Jennie Suddick) 2011 Ministry of Casual Living, Victoria, BC Mile Zero (with Jennie Suddick) 2011 Jawahar Kala Kendra, Jaipur, India of a feather 2007 Zero Four Art Space, Chung Li, Taiwan of a feather 2006 The Canadian Trade Office, Taipei, Taiwan of a feather 2006 Stirred a Bird Gallery, Guelph everybody in Flamingo 2005 Zavitz Hall Gallery, Guelph Shauchaalaya/Latrine 2003 Selected Group Exhibitions 2020 The Reach Glimmers of the Radiant Real (Forthcoming) Abbottsford, BC 2019 McIntosh Gallery, University of Western Ontario Glimmers of the Radiant Real (Forthcoming) London Gladstone Hotel Come Up to My Room, Terraflora (Solo) Toronto 2018 Paul Petro Contemporary Art
  • 340 Traders Boulevard E Mississauga, On

    340 Traders Boulevard E Mississauga, On

    340 TRADERS BOULEVARD E MISSISSAUGA, ON AVAILABLE FOR LEASE 26,780 SF Freestanding Industrial Building HWY HWY 427 Property Highlights 410 • Fully Air-Conditioned Facility HWY • Functional Office Space 407 HWY • Gated Shipping Court 401 • Excellent Location With Easy Access to Highway 403, HWY HWY QEW 410 401 403 For more information please contact: Janse Rain Avison Young Principal, Sales Representative Commercial Real Estate (Ontario) Inc., Brokerage 905.283.2376 77 City Centre Drive, Suite 301 Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5B 1M5 [email protected] T 905.712.2100 F 905.712.2937 340 TRADERS BOULEVARD E | MISSISSAUGA, ON FOR LEASE HIGHWAY 403 HIGHWAY 401 340 Traders Blvd E KENNEDY RD TRADERS BLVD E HURONTARIO ST MATHESON BLVD PROPERTY DETAILS Total Area 26,780 sf COMMENTS • Well maintained freestanding building located in Office Area 10% Trader Parks Industrial Area 90% • Shipping apron can accommodate multiple 53’ Clear Height 16.5’ - 22’ trailers • One of the three truck level doors can convert Shipping 3 Truck Level Doors into a 12’x12’ drive-in Possession Immediate • Clear height varies from 16.5’ to 22’ Zoning E2 • Warehouse has separate men’s and women’s $ Asking Net Rate $9.95 psf washrooms, as well as a lunchroom area $ Additional Rent $3.65 (Est. 2020) 340 TRADERS BOULEVARD E | MISSISSAUGA, ON FOR LEASE FLOOR PLAN TRADERS BLVD E Total Area: 26,780 sf Office Area: 10% Industrial Area: 90% KENNEDY RD S RD KENNEDY Please note this floor plan is for marketing purposes and is to be used as a guide only. All efforts have been made to ensure its accuracy at time of print.
  • General Government Committee Agenda

    General Government Committee Agenda

    Final General Government Committee Agenda Date: November 7, 2016 Time: 9:30 AM Place: Council Chambers, 2nd Floor Municipal Administrative Centre 40 Temperance Street Bowmanville, Ontario Inquiries & Accommodations: For inquiries about this agenda, or to make arrangements for accessibility accommodations for persons attending, please contact: Michelle Chambers, Committee Coordinator, at 905-623-3379, ext. 2106 or by email at [email protected]. Alternate Format: If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator, at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Audio Record: The Municipality of Clarington makes an audio record of General Government Committee meetings. If you make a delegation or presentation at a General Government Committee meeting, the Municipality will be audio recording you and will make the recording public by publishing the recording on the Municipality’s website. Noon Recess: Please be advised that, as per the Municipality of Clarington’s Procedural By-law, this meeting will recess at 12:00 noon, for a one hour lunch break, unless otherwise determined by the Committee. Cell Phones: Please ensure all cell phones, mobile and other electronic devices are turned off or placed on non-audible mode during the meeting. Copies of Reports are available at www.clarington.net General Government Committee Agenda Date: November 7, 2016 Time: 9:30 AM Place: Council Chambers 1 Call to Order 2 New Business – Introduction 3 Adopt the Agenda 4 Declaration of Interest 5 Announcements 6 Adoption of
  • Annual Report

    Annual Report

    ISSUE 4 NUMBER 2 APRIL-JUNE 2007 Celebrating OurOur Community’sCommunity’s Public Library 2006 Annual Report ������������������������� �������������������������������� ������������ ����� ���������� ���� ���������������������������� ������ ������������������������������� �������������������������� ���� ��������������������������������������� � ������������������������������������������ � �������������������� ���������������������������������� ����������������������������������� �������������������������� ��������� ������ ����� ���������� ���������� ���������� ����������� ����������������������������������� ����������������������������������� � ���������� ���������� ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������� �������������������������������������������������� ��������������������������������������������� ������ ������������������� ������������������������ ������������������� ����������������������������� ���������������������������������� ������� � ���� �������������������������������������� � ��� � ����������������������������������� ����������������� ��������������� ������ �������������������������������������������������������� ����������������������������������������� ������������������������������������������������� � ������������������������������������������������ ������������������������ ������������������������������� ������������� �������������������������� ������������������������ ���������������� �������������������������������������������������� ������������������ ���������������� ������������
  • AGENDA Regular Board Meeting

    AGENDA Regular Board Meeting

    AGENDA Regular Board Meeting Tuesday, January 28, 2020, 7:00 p.m. Board Room, Catholic Education Centre Mission: Disciples of Christ, nurturing mind, body, and soul to the fullness of life. Vision: Changing the world through Catholic education. Pages A. Routine Matters 1. Call to Order and Attendance 2. Acknowledgement of First Nations Sacred Territory 3. National Anthem 4. Opening Prayer 3 5. Approval of Agenda a. Approval of Calendar Items 6. Declaration of Interest 7. Approval of Minutes, Regular Board Meeting, December 10, 2019 7 a. Business Arising from the Minutes B. Pastor's Remarks C. Awards and Presentation D. Delegations E. Updates/Information/Reports from Trustees for Receipt 1. Regular Reports 2. Good News Items F. Information/Reports from Committees for Receipt 1. Minutes of the Brampton School Traffic Safety Council Meeting, November 7, 2019 25 2. Minutes of the Central Council for Catholic School Councils Meeting, November 7, 39 2019 3. Minutes of the Special Education Advisory Committee Meeting, November 13, 2019 45 4. Minutes of the Administration and Finance Committee Meeting, December 2, 2019 52 5. Minutes of the Special Education Advisory Committee Meeting, December 4, 2019 60 6. Minutes of the Brampton School Traffic Safety Council Meeting, December 5, 2019 66 7. Minutes of the Faith and Program Committee Meeting, December 9, 2019 78 G. Information/Reports from Administration for Receipt 1. Letter of Retirement - Karen Kovacs, Principal 85 H. Trustee/Committee/Administration Reports Requiring Action 1. Nominations For Membership on the Special Education Advisory Committee 87 2. Motions Recommended by Faith and Program Committee Meeting, December 9, 2019 89 3.
  • Forward Looking Statements

    Forward Looking Statements

    TORSTAR CORPORATION 2020 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM March 20, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS ....................................................................................................................................... 1 I. CORPORATE STRUCTURE .......................................................................................................................................... 4 A. Name, Address and Incorporation .......................................................................................................................... 4 B. Subsidiaries ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 II. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS ....................................................................................................... 4 A. Three-Year History ................................................................................................................................................ 5 B. Recent Developments ............................................................................................................................................. 6 III. DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS .............................................................................................................................. 6 A. General Summary................................................................................................................................................... 6 B.
  • Minutes Meeting No1960

    Minutes Meeting No1960

    Minutes Toronto Transit Commission Meeting No. 1960 Monday, June 24, 2013 A meeting of the TTC Board was held in Committee Room 2, 2nd Floor, Toronto City Hall, 100 Queen Street West, Toronto, Ontario on Monday, June 24, 2013 commencing at 10:13 a.m. The meeting recessed at 10:14 a.m. and re-convened at 1:05 p.m. K. Stintz (Chair), M. Adamson (Vice-Chair), M. Augimeri, R. Cho, J. Colle, G. De Baeremaeker, A. Heisey, P. Milczyn and J. Parker (Board Members), A. Byford (Chief Executive Officer), J. Taylor (Chief of Staff), D. Dixon (Chief Operating Officer), S. Ghaly (Chief Capital Officer), B. Hughes (Acting Chief Customer Officer), V. Rodo (Chief Financial & Administration Officer), C. Upfold (Acting Chief Service Officer), B. Leck (Head of Legal & General Counsel), M. Stambler (Head of Strategy and Service Planning), T. Baik (Chief Project Manager – Construction), B. Ross (Executive Director of Corporate Communications), K. Lee (Head of Commission Services) and D. McDonald (Co-ordinator – Corporate Secretariat Services) were present. K. Seto, Head of Streetcar Maintenance, was present for Item No. 2(a). S. Gabra, Supervisor of Project Co-ordination (TYSSE), was present for Items 5(b),(c),(d) and (e). V. Albanese, Head of Human Rights was present for Item No. 8(b). M. Darakjian, Head of Pensions, was present for Item No.10/C5. K. Stintz was in the Chair. TTC Board Meeting No. 1960 - Minutes Monday, June 24, 2013 Page 1 Declarations of Interest – Municipal Conflict of Interest Act A. Heisey removed himself from discussion and voting on Item No.
  • Mississauga Transitway Ambitious Design

    Mississauga Transitway Ambitious Design

    2 DRIVING TECHNOLOGY Durham innovates REVAMPED TARGETS 3 Amendments proposed WEDNESDAY, GREATER TORONTO JANUARY 23, 2019 Vol. 22 & HAMILTON AREA No. 4 URBAN DESIGN & PLACEMAKING REVITALIZING HAMILTON Rachael Williams s the City of Hamilton “I see a very strong will come,” said Torne. efective economic development prepares for signifcant connection between getting With the success of Art tool,” said placemaking, public A redevelopment along the the public realm right and Crawl, the community saw art and projects manager Ken waterfront, LRT corridor and promoting development and an opportunity to organize a Coit. in the downtown, the planning city-building, especially in a lot four-day music festival along Inspired by the success of and economic development of our older commercial areas James Street, where artists, James Street North, Coit told department is pulling together where we want to drive a lot of chefs, photographers and other NRU the new staf team will a staf team that will put a activity of pedestrians and foot vendors could showcase their attempt to follow a similar much-needed emphasis on trafc,” said Torne. creations. Te festival, known formula, looking at how to placemaking and public realm. Te synergy between art, as Super Crawl, attracts 200,000 repopulate under-utilized areas Led by Hamilton’s planning placemaking and economic visitors annually and results throughout the city through and economic development development has been playing in an economic impact of the use of public art and urban general manager Jason Torne, out in Hamilton over the past $16.9-million. design. the city is creating a new two decades, particularly along “It was a community driven One area that the city section within the tourism and James Street North.
  • New Station Initial Business Case Milton-Trafalgar Final October 2020

    New Station Initial Business Case Milton-Trafalgar Final October 2020

    New Station Initial Business Case Milton-Trafalgar Final October 2020 New Station Initial Business Case Milton-Trafalgar Final October 2020 Contents Introduction 1 The Case for Change 4 Investment Option 12 Strategic Case 18 Economic Case 31 Financial Case 37 Deliverability and Operations Case 41 Business Case Summary 45 iv Executive Summary Introduction The Town of Milton in association with a landowner’s group (the Proponent) approached Metrolinx to assess the opportunity to develop a new GO rail station on the south side of the Milton Corridor, west of Trafalgar Road. This market-driven initiative assumes the proposed station would be planned and paid for by the private sector. Once built, the station would be transferred to Metrolinx who would own and operate it. The proposed station location is on undeveloped land, at the heart of both the Trafalgar Corridor and Agerton Employment Secondary Plan Areas studied by the Town of Milton in 2017. As such, the project offers the Town of Milton the opportunity to realize an attractive and vibrant transit-oriented community that has the potential to benefit the entire region. Option for Analysis This Initial Business Case (IBC) assesses a single option for the proposed station. The opening-day concept plan includes one new side platform to the north of the corridor, with protection for a future second platform to the south. The site includes 1,000 parking spots, a passenger pick-up/drop-off area (40 wait spaces, 10 load spaces), bicycle parking (128 covered spaces, 64 secured spaces) and a bus loop including 11 sawtooth bus bays.
  • BBAC Minutes

    BBAC Minutes

    BBAC minutes December 15, 2014 - 6:30pm – 8:30pm 16 George Street North (Brampton Safe City Association offices) Attendees: Members: David Laing, Dayle Laing, Stephen Laidlaw, Kevin Montgomery, Lisa Stokes, George Shepperdley, Pauline (Polly) Thornham, John Van West, Erica Duque (Peel Active Transportation) Regrets: Gerald Pyjor, Peter Bolton, Ernst Braendli, Tricia Prato, Jerry Prato, Paola Rico, Chris Spinney, Jason Hammond (Community CarShare) Meeting Started: 6:42 pm Review and approve Motion to approve minutes: George, seconded Kevin – Carried minutes from last meeting Actions arising from previous minutes Brampton City Update David reported that he requested from the Clerk’s Office, a new Councillor representative for BBAC. He heard back that this decision is pending the outcome of the new committees of Council. (New Business) Regional Update Erica reported that Beth Savan’s project will be linked with Peel Region’s Community Based Social Marketing project for efficiencies and cost savings. David suggested that Ranjana Mitra, Executive Director of the Community Environment Alliance, and Uzma Ifan, Community Development Coordinator of the Punjabi Community Health Services might be appropriate partners. Action: David to send Ranjana’s and Uzma’s contact information to Erica. Erica reported she is organizing a “staff only” meeting on February 26th regarding Municipal Liability. The leading liability partner at Gowlings Lafleur Henderson LLP, lawyer Belinda Bain will be presenting on liability and insurance issues for active transportation. (Ms. Bain presented on this topic at the Ontario Bike Summit in Toronto last April.) Dave McLaughlin from MMM Group will be presenting about 1 | P a g e BBAC minutes Ontario Book 18.
  • REPORT City Council the Corporation of the City of Brampton

    REPORT City Council the Corporation of the City of Brampton

    REPORT City Council The Corporation of the City of Brampton Summary On August 13, 2020, in my capacity as Integrity Commissioner, I received a complaint (the “Complaint”) regarding Mayor Patrick Brown (“Mayor Brown”). The Complaint was based on an incident that took place on August 4, 2020, when Mayor Brown attended at the Earnscliffe Recreation Centre ice hockey arena (the “Arena”). The Complaint alleged that Mayor Brown was there to play hockey and that he was not wearing a mask. The Complaint alleged that Mayor Brown had violated Rule 4 (Use of City Property, Services, and Other Resources), Rule 7 (Improper use of Influence), Rule 15 (Discreditable Conduct), and Rule 18 (Failure to Adhere to Council Policies and Procedures) of the City of Brampton’s Code of Conduct for Members of Council (the “Code”). The Complaint also alleged that Mayor Brown had violated the City of Brampton’s Mandatory Face Coverings By-law 135-2020 (the “Mask By-law”), and implied that he had violated the provincial re-opening guidelines passed under the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act (the “Emergency Orders”) and was involved in changing the City of Brampton’s “Facility Rental” website to cover his actions. Background and Summary I received the Complaint from Aaron Rosenberg, a lawyer representing the Rebel News Network Ltd. (“Rebel News”) and one of its reporters, David Menzies (“Mr. Menzies”). I will refer to them collectively as the “Complainants”. The Complaint included a link to a brief clip of footage taken by Rebel News on August 4, 2020. The Complaint also contained a link to an article published by the Brampton Guardian on August 9, 2020, titled: “Patrick Brown responds to Rebel News video alleging he broke Brampton’s COVID-19 bylaws” (the “Guardian Article”) (Tab 1).
  • Transportation Needs

    Transportation Needs

    Chapter 2 – Transportation Needs 407 TRANSITWAY – WEST OF BRANT STREET TO WEST OF HURONTARIO STREET MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION - CENTRAL REGION 2.6.4. Sensitivity Analysis 2-20 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.7. Systems Planning – Summary of Findings 2-21 2. TRANSPORTATION NEEDS 2-1 2.1. Introduction 2-1 2.1.1. Background 2-1 2.1.2. Scope of Systems Planning 2-1 2.1.3. Study Corridor 2-1 2.1.4. Approach 2-2 2.1.5. Overview of the Chapter 2-2 2.2. Existing Conditions and Past Trends 2-2 2.2.1. Current Land Use 2-2 2.2.2. Transportation System 2-3 2.2.3. Historic Travel Trends 2-4 2.2.4. Current Demands and System Performance 2-5 2.3. Future Conditions 2-7 2.3.1. Land Use Changes 2-7 2.3.2. Transportation Network Changes 2-8 2.3.3. Changes in Travel Patterns 2-9 2.3.4. Future Demand and System Performance 2-10 2.4. Service Concept 2-13 2.4.1. Operating Characteristics 2-13 2.4.2. Conceptual Operating and Service Strategy 2-13 2.5. Vehicle Maintenance and Storage support 2-14 2.5.1. Facility Need 2-14 2.5.2. West Yard – Capacity Assessment 2-15 2.5.3. West Yard – Location 2-15 2.6. Transitway Ridership Forecasts 2-15 2.6.1. Strategic Forecasts 2-15 2.6.2. Station Evaluation 2-17 2.6.3. Revised Forecasts 2-18 DRAFT 2-0 . Update ridership forecasts to the 2041 horizon; 2.