Cleaner Coal in China Cleaner Coal in China

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cleaner Coal in China Cleaner Coal in China I N T E R N A T I O N A L ENERGY AGENCY Please note that this PDF is subject to specific restrictions that limit its use and distribution. The terms and conditions are available online at www.iea.org/about/ copyright.asp Cleaner Coal in China Cleaner Coal in China China’s rapid economic growth has aroused intense interest around the world. Policy makers, industrialists, investors, environmentalists, researchers and others want to better understand the issues that this populous nation faces as it further develops an already thriving economy largely fuelled by coal. This study sheds light on the Chinese coal supply and transformation sectors. China’s coal, mined locally and available at a relatively low cost, has brought enormous benefits to energy consumers in China and to those outside the country who enjoy the products of its coal-based economy. Yet from another perspective, China’s coal use has a high cost. Despite progress, health and safety in the thousands of small coal mines lag far behind the standards achieved in China’s modern, large mines. Environmental degradation is a real and pressing problem at all stages of coal production, supply and use. Adding to these burdens, emissions of carbon dioxide are of concern to the Chinese government as it embarks on its own climate protection strategy. Technology solutions are already transforming the way coal is used in China and elsewhere. This study explores the context in which the development and deployment of these technologies can be accelerated. Providing a large amount of new data, it describes in detail the situation in China as well as the experiences of other countries in making coal cleaner. Above all, the report calls for much greater levels of collaboration – existing bi-lateral and multi-lateral co-operation with China on coal is found lacking. China’s growing openness presents many commercial opportunities. Establishing a global market for cleaner coal technologies is key to unlocking the potential of technology – one of ten major recommendations made in this study. -:HSTCQE=UY]VYU: (61 2008 24 1 P1) 978-92-64-04814-0 €100 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Cleaner Coal in China IEA member countries: Australia INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Austria The International Energy Agency (IEA) is an autonomous body which was established in Belgium November 1974 within the framework of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation Canada and Development (OECD) to implement an international energy programme. It carries out a comprehensive programme of energy co-operation among twenty-eight Czech Republic of the thirty OECD member countries. The basic aims of the IEA are: Denmark n To maintain and improve systems for coping with oil supply disruptions. n To promote rational energy policies in a global context through co-operative Finland relations with non-member countries, industry and international organisations. France n To operate a permanent information system on international oil markets. n To provide data on other aspects of international energy markets. Germany n To improve the world’s energy supply and demand structure by developing Greece alternative energy sources and increasing the efficiency of energy use. n To promote international collaboration on energy technology. Hungary n To assist in the integration of environmental and energy Ireland policies, including relating to climate change. Italy Japan Korea (Republic of) Luxembourg Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland ORGANISATION FOR Portugal ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Slovak Republic Spain The OECD is a unique forum where the governments of thirty democracies work together to address the Sweden economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the forefront of Switzerland efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, Turkey such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population. The Organisation provides a setting United Kingdom where governments can compare policy experiences, seek answers to common United States problems, identify good practice and work to co-ordinate domestic and The European Commission international policies. also participates in the work of the IEA. © OECD/IEA, 2009 International Energy Agency (IEA) 9 rue de la Fédération, 75739 Paris Cedex 15, France Please note that this publication is subject to specific restrictions that limit its use and distribution. The terms and conditions are available online at www.iea.org/about/copyright.asp FOREWORD - 3 FOREWORD BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE IEA In 1999, the IEA Coal Industry Advisory Board (CIAB) reported on coal in China.1 Its recommendations focussed on coal sector reform and opportunities for co-operation. Today, much of that report is of merely historical interest, such is the rate of change in China over the last decade. Remarkable progress has been made in a sector that has fuelled China’s rapid economic growth, bringing with it a better life for many of China’s citizens. Today, coal production in China provides more energy to the world’s economy than the whole of Middle Eastern oil production. This report is a timely reminder that the use of coal on such a scale cannot be ignored – it is in everyone’s interest to ensure that the environmental concerns associated with coal can be managed, even in these times of economic uncertainty. It contains a wealth of information to guide those with an interest in engaging with China and helping to shape a cleaner future. Its recommendations are pragmatic. They offer opportunities for China to grasp, but only if developed countries show their commitment to clean energy by moving quickly to establish markets for technologies that are currently too expensive and not fully demonstrated. I am thinking in particular of carbon dioxide capture and storage – a critical technology for the world at large. The IEA has been fortunate to have the support of the National Development and Reform Commission, ably assisted by the China Coal Information Institute, and the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office in carrying out this work. This allowed us to bring together a team of consultants, some based in China, others in Japan and the UK, to complete the project. Experts from China worked on secondment at the IEA in Paris and made site visits to Germany and the UK. Reciprocal visits were made to many facilities in China, of all ages and sizes. Such exchanges at a working level need to grow, and professional relationships established that can serve the aims and objectives of governments. This initiative has also highlighted some practical difficulties. Reliable information on China remains a much sought-after and valuable commodity. Likewise, China seeks better information on how other countries have implemented effective energy and environmental policies. Language remains a barrier to sharing information – we need more bilingual experts and analysts to collect, assimilate and disseminate information of benefit to Chinese policy makers and their counterparts elsewhere. In May 2008, the CIAB held a working meeting in Beijing for the first time. Participants made site visits to the Shendong coalfield in Inner Mongolia and heard the IEA Secretariat present a draft of this report to Chinese authorities. They were, without exception, encouraged by what they saw and heard. I wish to echo their sentiments and urge governments and corporations to accelerate their efforts in working with 2009 1. Coal in the Energy Supply of China, IEA Coal Industry Advisory Board, OECD/IEA, Paris, 1999. OECD/IEA, © 4 - CLEANER COAL IN CHINA China. Commercial activity, official government-to-government co-operation, research and development partnerships and personal relationships are all needed to make clean energy a reality. China itself has the opportunity to steal a lead in the development of cleaner coal technologies in response to a growing, global market. In that respect, my organisation is committed to promoting the competitive markets that we know are needed to win the environmental benefits of widespread deployment of cleaner technologies. The report and key recommendations have been developed by the project team and were subject to peer review by experts inside and outside of China, as well as within the Secretariat. Whilst our member countries have given helpful feedback on the report, it does not necessarily reflect the views or position of IEA member countries, or of any official Chinese body. It is published under my authority as Executive Director as part of the IEA aim to engage more closely with all major energy-consuming countries. Nobuo Tanaka Executive Director 2009 OECD/IEA, © FOREWORD - 5 FOREWORD BY THE CHIEF ENGINEER OF THE NATIONAL ENERGY ADMINISTRATION OF THE NDRC Energy is an essential element for human survival and development. Over the history of mankind, each and every significant step in the progress of civilisation has been accompanied by energy innovations and substitutions. The exploitation and utilisation of fossil energy has boosted enormously world economic development and society as a whole. However, large-scale exploitation and utilisation of fossil energy is also one of the major causes of ecological destruction and environmental pollution. As is well known, coal is China’s dominant source of energy. It accounts for about 70 percent of primary energy production and consumption. Furthermore, coal will remain the main energy source in China for a long period of time in the future. The proportion of coal in China’s energy mix is far higher than the world average, and coal exploitation and utilisation has become one of the major causes of environmental pollution. Therefore, clean coal technology is a strategic choice for energy development in China. The central government has adopted clean coal technology as a strategy for adjusting coal industry structure, increasing the commercial value of coal and coal-based products, improving the environment, and realising the sustainable development of the coal industry.
Recommended publications
  • The Nature of Waste Associated with Closed Mines in England and Wales
    The nature of waste associated with closed mines in England and Wales Minerals & Waste Programme Open Report OR/10/14 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MINERALS & WASTE PROGRAMME OPEN REPORT OR/10/14 The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data are used with the permission of the The nature of waste associated Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. OS Topography © Crown with closed mines in England and Copyright. All rights reserved. BGS 100017897/2010 Wales Keywords Abandoned mine waste facilities; Palumbo-Roe, B and Colman, T England and Wales; mineral deposits; environmental impact; Contributor/editor European Mine Waste Directive. Cameron, D G, Linley, K and Gunn, A G Front cover Graiggoch Mine (SN 7040 7410), Ceredigion, Wales. Bibliographical reference Palumbo-Roe, B and Colman, T with contributions from Cameron, D G, Linley, K and Gunn, A G. 2010. The nature of waste associated with closed mines in England and Wales. British Geological Survey Open Report, OR/10/14. 98pp. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and the Environment Agency that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. The views and statements expressed in this report are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily represent the views of the Environment Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Companies Subject to Exclusion
    Opdateret 01-08-2021 Vellivs Ekslusionsliste Velliv ønsker ikke at investere i selskaber, som bryder med Vellivs ESG-kriterier fastlagt i politikken for ansvarlig investering og aktivt ejerskab og som ikke udviser forandringsvilje i forhold til deres håndtering af ESG-risici. Endelig ønsker Velliv ikke at investere i tobaksselselskaber, selskaber med aktivteter i kontroversielle våben eller selskaber, hvor mere end 5 pct. af omsætningen stammer fra udvinding af kul og oliesand. Selsakb Kommentar 22nd Century Group, Inc. Tobacco AECOM Contr.Weapons Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. Contr.Weapons Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc. Contr.Weapons Aeroteh SA Contr.Weapons Airbus SE Contr.Weapons Al-Eqbal Co. for Investment Plc Tobacco ALLETE, Inc. Kul Alliance Holdings GP LP Coal Alliance Resource Operating Partners LP Coal Alliance Resource Partners LP Coal Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc Coal Alpha Natural Resources Inc Coal Altadis Emisiones Financieras SA Tobacco Altadis SA Tobacco AltaGas Ltd. Gas/ESG Altius Minerals Corporation Coal Altria Group, Inc. Tobacco Anglo American plc Kul Anglo Pacific Group plc Coal Arch Resources, Inc. Coal Arcis Resources Corp. Tobacco Aryt Industries Ltd. Contr.Weapons Asenovgrad Tabac AD Tobacco Ashtrom Group Ltd. Normviolation>human rights Athabasca Oil Corporation Oilsand Avco Corp. Contr.Weapons B.A.T. Capital Corp. Tobacco B.A.T. Finance BV Tobacco B.A.T. International Finance Plc Tobacco Babcock International Group plc Contr.Weapons BADECO ADRIA dd Tobacco BAE Systems (Finance) Ltd. Contr.Weapons BAE Systems plc Contr.Weapons Bat Brasil Tobacco Bathurst Resources Limited Coal Baytex Energy (LP) Ltd. Oilsand Baytex Energy Corp. Oilsand Bellatora, Inc. Tobacco BHP Group Limited Kul BHP Group Plc Kul BlackPearl Resources, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • BANKING on CLIMATE CHANGE Fossil Fuel Finance Report Card 2017
    Fossil Fuel Finance Report Card 2017 BANKING ON CLIMATE CHANGE Fossil Fuel Finance Report Card 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS DISCLAIMER: The information in this report is not financial advice, investment advice, trading advice or any other advice. 2 INTRODUCTION 26 COAL MINING 50 HUMAN RIGHTS 3 Executive Summary 27 Policy Review and Model Policy 51 Background 4 Introduction 29 CASE STUDY: Peabody Energy — Post-Bankruptcy 52 CASE STUDY: Dakota Access Pipeline — Funding 6 Extreme Fossil Fuels League Table Business as Usual the Black Snake 7 Key Data 30 CASE STUDY: Bank Beware — Poland's Talk on Coal 8 Bank Grades Summary Mining is Bad Business 54 CONCLUSION 10 Methodology 31 Coal Mining League Table 32 Coal Mining Bank Grades 56 APPENDICES 12 EXTREME OIL 56 Appendix 1: Full Grading Criteria 13 Model Extreme Oil Policy 34 COAL POWER 58 Appendix 2: Companies Included 13 Tar Sands: A Make or Break Moment 35 Policy Review and Model Policy 65 Appendix 3: Calculation of Segment Adjusters 15 CASE STUDY: Keystone XL — No Means No 37 CASE STUDY: Coal Power Expansion Plans Slow in 16 CASE STUDY: Doing “Whatever it Takes” to Vietnam, But Banks Haven’t Gotten the Memo 66 ENDNOTES Stop the Trans Mountain Pipeline 38 CASE STUDY: Western Banks Backing Major Coal Plant 17 Tar Sands League Table Expansion Plans in the Philippines 18 Drilling in Ultra-Deep Waters 39 Coal Mining League Table 19 Ultra-Deepwater Oil League Table 40 Coal Mining Bank Grades THIS REPORT WAS WRITTEN IN COLLABORATION WITH: 20 Arctic Drilling: Still Off Limits 21 Arctic Oil League Table 42 LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS EXPORT (LNG) 350.org Last Real Indians Bold Alliance Les Amis de la Terre France 22 Forecasting Failure 43 Background and Model Policy CHANGE Market Forces CoalSwarm Mazaska Talks 24 Extreme Oil Bank Grades 44 CASE STUDY: Resisting a Web of Fracking-Pipeline-LNG DivestInvest Individual MN350 Earthworks People & Planet Pollution FairFin Re:Common Friends of the Earth Scotland Save RGV from LNG 46 CASE STUDY: Rio Grande Valley Friends of the Earth U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • ABM Investama Tbk PT Involvement in Coal Mining Adani Ports & Special
    Company Comment ABM Investama Tbk PT Involvement in coal mining Adani Ports & Special Economic Zone Ltd Violation of established norms Adaro Energy Tbk PT Involvement in coal mining Adaro Indonesia PT Involvement in coal mining Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings Inc Involvement in nuclear weapons Aeroteh SA Involvement in cluster munitions Agritrade Resources Ltd Involvement in coal mining Airbus SE Involvement in nuclear weapons Alfa Energi Investama Tbk PT Involvement in coal mining Alliance Holdings GP LP Involvement in coal mining Alliance Resource Operating Partners LP / Alliance Involvement in coal mining Resource Finance Corp Alliance Resource Partners LP Involvement in coal mining Alpha Natural Resources Inc Involvement in coal mining Altius Minerals Corp Involvement in coal mining Ammunition & Metallurgy Industries Group Involvement in anti-personnel mines Anglo Pacific Group plc Involvement in coal mining Anhui Great Wall Military Industry Co Ltd Involvement in cluster munitions Arch Coal Inc Involvement in coal mining Armament Research and Development Involvement in cluster munitions & anti- Establishment personnel mines Arrow Exploration Corp Involvement in oil sand Aryt Industries Ltd Involvement in cluster munitions Ashakacem PLC Involvement in coal mining Asia Resource Minerals PLC Involvement in coal mining Athabasca Oil Corp Involvement in oil sand Atomenergoprom JSC (Atomic Energy Power Corp) Involvement in nuclear weapons Babcock International Group PLC Involvement in nuclear weapons BAE Systems PLC Involvement in nuclear weapons
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of China in 2016
    2016 Minerals Yearbook CHINA [ADVANCE RELEASE] U.S. Department of the Interior December 2018 U.S. Geological Survey The Mineral Industry of China By Sean Xun In China, unprecedented economic growth since the late of the country’s total nonagricultural employment. In 2016, 20th century had resulted in large increases in the country’s the total investment in fixed assets (excluding that by rural production of and demand for mineral commodities. These households; see reference at the end of the paragraph for a changes were dominating factors in the development of the detailed definition) was $8.78 trillion, of which $2.72 trillion global mineral industry during the past two decades. In more was invested in the manufacturing sector and $149 billion was recent years, owing to the country’s economic slowdown invested in the mining sector (National Bureau of Statistics of and to stricter environmental regulations in place by the China, 2017b, sec. 3–1, 3–3, 3–6, 4–5, 10–6). Government since late 2012, the mineral industry in China had In 2016, the foreign direct investment (FDI) actually used faced some challenges, such as underutilization of production in China was $126 billion, which was the same as in 2015. capacity, slow demand growth, and low profitability. To In 2016, about 0.08% of the FDI was directed to the mining address these challenges, the Government had implemented sector compared with 0.2% in 2015, and 27% was directed to policies of capacity control (to restrict the addition of new the manufacturing sector compared with 31% in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 1 China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation 1913182 70713
    2011 Ranking 2010 Company Name Revenue (RMB, million) Net profit (RMB Million) Rankings (x,000,000) (x,000,000) 1 1 China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation 1913182 70713 2 2 China National Petroleum Corporation 1465415 139871 3 3 China Mobile Limited 485231 119640 China Mobile Revenue: 485,231,000,000 4 5 China Railway Group Limited 473663 7488 5 4 China Railway Construction Corporation Limited 470159 4246 6 6 China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. 388791 33626 7 7 Bank of China Ltd 380821 165156 8 9 China Construction Company Limited 370418 9237 9 8 China Construction Bank Corporation 323489 134844 10 17 Shanghai Automotive Group Co., Ltd. 313376 13698 11 . Agricultural Bank of China Co., Ltd. 290418 94873 12 10 China Bank 276817 104418 China Communications Construction Company 13 11 Limited 272734 9863 14 12 China Telecom Corporation Limited 219864 15759 China Telecom 15 13 China Metallurgical Co., Ltd. 206792 5321 16 15 Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. 202413 12889 17 16 China Ping An Insurance (Group) Co., Ltd. 189439 17311 18 21 China National Offshore Oil Company Limited 183053 54410 19 14 China Unicom Co., Ltd. 176168 1228 China Unicom 20 19 China PICC 154307 5212 21 18 China Shenhua Energy Company Limited 152063 37187 22 20 Lenovo Group Limited 143252 1665 Lenovo 23 22 China Pacific Insurance (Group) Co., Ltd. 141662 8557 24 23 Minmetals Development Co., Ltd. 131466 385 25 24 Dongfeng Motor Group Co., Ltd. 122395 10981 26 29 Aluminum Corporation of China 120995 778 27 25 Hebei Iron and Steel Co., Ltd. 116919 1411 28 68 Great Wall Technology Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Financial and Economic Crisis on Energy Investment
    INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY agence internationale de l’energie THE IMPACT OF THE FiNANCIAL AND ECONOMIC CRISIS ON GLOBAL ENERGY INVESTMENT © OECD/IEA, May 2009 International Energy Agency Note to Readers This report was prepared for the G8 Energy Ministerial in Rome on 24-25 May 2009 by the Office of the Chief Economist (OCE) of the International Energy Agency (IEA) in co-operation with other offices of the Agency. The study was directed by Dr. Fatih Birol, Chief Economist of the IEA. The work could not have been completed without the extensive data provided by many government bodies, international organisations, energy companies and financial institutions worldwide. The 2009 edition of the World Energy Outlook (WEO), to be released on 10 November, will include an update of this analysis and additional insights into the implications of the financial and economic crisis on energy security, climate change and energy poverty over the medium and longer- term. 2 The Impact of the Financial and Economic Crisis on Global Energy Investment – © OECD/IEA 2009 International Energy Agency EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Energy investment worldwide is plunging in the face of a tougher financing environment, weakening final demand for energy and falling cash flows – the result, primarily, of the global financial crisis and the worst recession since the Second World War. Reliable data on recent trends in capital spending and demand are still coming in, but there is clear evidence that energy investment in most regions and sectors will drop sharply in 2009. Preliminary data points to sharp falls in demand for energy, especially in the OECD, contributing to the recent sharp decline in the international prices of oil, natural gas and coal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Efficiency Evaluation of Energy Enterprise Group Finance
    Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, volume 16 First International Conference on Economic and Business Management (FEBM 2016) The Efficiency Evaluation of Energy Enterprise Group Finance Companies Based on DEA Lina Jia a*, Ren Jin Sun a, Gang Lin b, LiLe Yang c a University of Petroleum, Beijing, China b China Construction Bank, Beijing (Branch), China c Xi'an Changqing Technology Engineering Co., Ltd., China *Corresponding author: Lina Jia, Master,E-mail:[email protected] Abstract: By the end of 2015, about 196 financial companies have been established in China. The energy finance companies accounted for about 25% of the proportion. Energy finance groups has some special character such as the big size of funds, the wide range of business, so the level of efficiency of its affiliated finance company has become the focus of attention. In this paper , we choose DEA to measure the efficiency(technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency, scale efficiency and return to scale ) and make projection analysis for fifty energy enterprise group finance companies in 2014. The following results were obtained:①The overall efficiency of the energy finance companies is not high. ①Under the condition of maintaining the current level of output, Most of the energy enterprise finance companies should be appropriate to reduce the input redundancy, so as to improve efficiency and avoid unnecessary waste. ③Some companies should continuously improve the internal management level to achieve the level and the size of output . Through the projection analysis, this paper provides some enlightenment and practical guidance for the improvement of the efficiency level of the non DEA effective energy group enterprise group.
    [Show full text]
  • Reclamation and Development of Geomechanically Transformed Land in the Konin-Turek Coal Basin
    POLISH JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE VOL. XLIX/2 2016 PL ISSN 0079-2985 DOI: 10.17951/pjss/2016.49.2.123 AGNIESZKA MOCEK-PŁÓCINIAK* RECLAMATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF GEOMECHANICALLY TRANSFORMED LAND IN THE KONIN-TUREK COAL BASIN Received: 2016.09.05 Accepted: 2017.02.15 1Abstract. This overview article presents major forms of reclamation and development of external and internal spoil tips, which are formed during brown coal mining and from bottom ash dumped near open-pit mines and power stations. In the late 1970s, a new form of agricultural and forest recultivation was developed – the PAN model. According to the concept, crops and forest-forming plant species should be introduced to post-mining grounds immediately after the end of technical recultivation. Vegetation is a particularly reliable indicator of habitat properties and small changes taking place in nature undergoing recovery. Other bioindicators of the quality and health of new- ly formed soil include the biomass of microorganisms, their count, composition and enzymatic activity. In many countries the assessment of the influence of anthropogenic stress factors on the count of soil microorganisms has become one of key elements of obligatory inspection under environmental monitoring. In consequence of revitalisation of anthropogenically changed areas, biological life is restored within the period of at least 20–30 years. It is manifested by the develop- ment of microbial population and soil fauna. Keywords: reclamation, post-mining areas, enzymatic activity, microorganisms, vegetation INTRODUCTION Many minerals are acquired by means of open-pit or underground mining. It causes land transformation and permanent changes in the landscape. New convex forms known as external spoil tips appear in natural geomorphologi- cal systems.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Expanding Overseas Coal Power Industry
    Department of War Studies strategy paper 11 paper strategy China’s Expanding Overseas Coal Power Industry: New Strategic Opportunities, Commercial Risks, Climate Challenges and Geopolitical Implications Dr Frank Umbach & Dr Ka-ho Yu 2 China’s Expanding Overseas Coal Power Industry EUCERS Advisory Board Marco Arcelli Executive Vice President, Upstream Gas, Frederick Kempe President and CEO, Atlantic Council, Enel, Rome Washington, D.C., USA Professor Dr Hüseyin Bagci Department Chair of International Ilya Kochevrin Executive Director of Gazprom Export Ltd. Relations, Middle East Technical University Inonu Bulvari, Thierry de Montbrial Founder and President of the Institute Ankara Français des Relations Internationales (IFRI), Paris Andrew Bartlett Managing Director, Bartlett Energy Advisers Chris Mottershead Vice Principal, King’s College London Volker Beckers Chairman, Spenceram Limited Dr Pierre Noël Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah Senior Fellow for Professor Dr Marc Oliver Bettzüge Chair of Energy Economics, Economic and Energy Security, IISS Asia Department of Economics and Director of the Institute of Dr Ligia Noronha Director Resources, Regulation and Global Energy Economics (EWI), University of Cologne Security, TERI, New Delhi Professor Dr Iulian Chifu Advisor to the Romanian President Janusz Reiter Center for International Relations, Warsaw for Strategic Affairs, Security and Foreign Policy and President of the Center for Conflict Prevention and Early Professor Dr Karl Rose Senior Fellow Scenarios, World Warning, Bucharest Energy Council, Vienna/Londo Dr John Chipman Director International Institute for Professor Dr Burkhard Schwenker Chairman of the Strategic Studies (IISS), London Supervisory Board, Roland Berger Strategy Consultants GmbH, Hamburg Professor Dr Dieter Helm University of Oxford Professor Dr Karl Kaiser Director of the Program on Transatlantic Relations of the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, Cambridge, USA Media Partners Impressum Design © 2016 EUCERS.
    [Show full text]
  • Mine-Water Chemistry: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly David Banks 7 Paul L
    Research article Mine-water chemistry: the good, the bad and the ugly David Banks 7 Paul L. Younger 7 Rolf-Tore Arnesen 7 Egil R. Iversen 7 Sheila B. Banks Objective Abstract Contaminative mine drainage waters have become one of the major hydrogeological and The objective of this paper is to review the variety of hy- geochemical problems arising from mankind’s in- drochemical characteristics, environmental impacts and trusion into the geosphere. Mine drainage waters in treatment methods pertaining to waters discharging from Scandinavia and the United Kingdom are of three mines or mine waste deposits. The paper will draw pre- main types: (1) saline formation waters; (2) acidic, dominantly on examples from the United Kingdom and heavy-metal-containing, sulphate waters derived Norway, many of which have not previously been re- from pyrite oxidation, and (3) alkaline, hydrogen- ported in mainstream literature, to illustrate this variety. sulphide-containing, heavy-metal-poor waters re- A list of references is provided for the reader wishing to sulting from buffering reactions and/or sulphate re- obtain further details of the sites reviewed. duction. Mine waters are not merely to be per- ceived as problems, they can be regarded as indus- trial or drinking water sources and have been used for sewage treatment, tanning and industrial metals extraction. Mine-water problems may be addressed by isolating the contaminant source, by suppressing Introduction the reactions releasing contaminants, or by active or passive water treatment. Innovative treatment In the “First World”, many coal and metal ore mines techniques such as galvanic suppression, applica- have been closed, for economical or political reasons, tion of bactericides, neutralising or reducing agents during the past decade (Younger 1994; Coldewey and (pulverised fly ash-based grouts, cattle manure, Semrau 1994; King 1995; Dumpleton 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Management in Mining Areas
    GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT IN MINING AREAS Proceedings of the 2nd IMAGE-TRAIN Advanced Study Course Pécs, Hungary, June 23-27, 2003 EUROPEAN COMMISSION RESEARCH DIRECTORATE-GENERAL CONFERENCE PAPERS/TAGUNGSBERICHTE CP-035 Wien/Vienna, 2004 Projektleitung/Project Management Gundula Prokop Editors Gundula Prokop, Umweltbundesamt, Spittelauer Lände 5, 1090 Vienna, Austria e-mail: [email protected] Paul Younger, University of Newcastle upon TyneNE1 7RU Newcastle upon Tyne, UK e-mail: [email protected] Karl Ernst Roehl, Karlsruhe University, Kaiserstrasse 12, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany e-mail: [email protected] Veranstaltungsorganisation/Event Organisation The Umweltbundesamt being responsible for the overall co-ordination of the meeting. University of Newcastle upon being responsible for the course programme. Karlsruhe University being responsible for the on-site organisation. Mecsekerc Rt. functioning as host and being responsible for the excursion to the aban- doned uranium mining areas near Pécs. Veranstaltungsfinanzierung/Event Funding The European Commission Research Directorate General Satz und Layout/Typesetting and Layout Elisabeth Lössl, Umweltbundesamt Danksagung/Acknowledgement Special thanks are due to Dr. Mihaly Csövári and his team from Mecsek Ore Environ- ment Corporation in Pécs for organising and supporting this course and for providing their expertise for the on-site excursions. Impressum Medieninhaber und Herausgeber: Umweltbundesamt GmbH Published by: Spittelauer Lände 5, 1090 Wien/Vienna, Austria Die unverändert abgedruckten Einzelreferate geben die Fachmeinung ihrer Autoren und nicht notwendigerweise die offizielle Meinung des Umweltbundessamtes wieder. The publisher makes no representation, express or implied, with regard to the accuracy of the information contained in this book and cannot accept any legal responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions that may be made.
    [Show full text]