Morphological changes under strain for different thermoplastic polyurethanes monitored by SAXS related to strain-at-break
Almut Stribeck1∗, Xuke Li1, Ahmad Zeinolebadi2, Elmar Pöselt3, Berend Eling3, Sérgio Funari4
1University of Hamburg, Department of Chemistry, Institute TMC, Bundesstr. 45, 20146 Hamburg, Germany 2Polymer Consult Buchner GmbH, Schwarzer Weg 34, 22309 Hamburg, Germany 3BASF Polyurethanes GmbH, Elastogranstr. 60, 49448 Lemförde, Germany 4HASYLAB at DESY, Notkestr. 85, 22603 Hamburg, Germany ∗E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract. In tensile tests of 6 different hand- that separates the weak discrete scattering from cast thermoplastic polyurethanes (TPU) with the height distribution of hard domains, whose a hard-segment content HSC=0.51 the vol- weight returns the variation of VH with the ume fraction of hard domains (VH) has been strain. All TPUs are based on 4,4’-methylene tracked. The materials exhibit a linear increase diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI). The other raw up to a strain of approx. 0.5 (strain-induced components are systematically varied. phase separation). Thereafter a linear decrease of VH is indicated. When stretched by 100% about 25% of the initially present hard domains are destroyed. The extrapolation to VH=0 is close to the elongation at break. Characteris- Two MDI units determine the height of the tic materials parameters are suggested by the average hard domain. The variation of VH found relation. with strain is described by a tensile augmenta- The tests (maximum strain: 3) are moni- tion (in analogy to the tensile strength) which tored by small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). is realized at an end-of-growth strain. The fol- The morphology is closer to particle scatter- lowing hard domain destruction is governed by ing than that of machine-processed material. a consumption factor. Deviations between ex- Therefore the longitudinal scattering appears trapolated and measured strain at break may be fittable by a one-dimensional statistical model related to the TPU composition.
1 1 Introduction mer chains with different sequence statistics will have grown. The mixture is poured onto Thermoplastic polyurethanes (TPU) are pro- a cool plate for curing. During this step the duced in the reaction of a diisocyanate, a formation of convection cells is observed. Ma- short-chain diol and a polyol. The isocyanate terial taken from the center of the convection and short-chain diol form a rigid or hard seg- cells exhibits different composition as com- ment; these isocyanate-ended hard segments pared to material from the edges of the con- are linked through the polyol soft block to vection cells.4 So in the block sequences of form a statistical block copolymer of the (A- hand cast material a double variability is found, B)n type. When all the components of the where the primary one is the result of the sta- polyurethane are difunctional, a linear thermo- tistical nature of the polyaddition. This will plastic polymer is obtained. As the hard and probably affect even the morphology of hard soft chain segments are thermodynamically in- and soft domains, which should exhibit greater compatible, phase separation occurs resulting variability of domain sizes. Ultimately, hand- in the formation of domains that are either rich casting might even have an impact on the mate- in soft or hard segments. The exact nature rials properties. In studies that vary the mold- of the final morphology depends on both the ing conditions, effects on the materials perfor- molecular composition and the processing con- mance have been reported for PU5–7 or epoxy ditions. As far as the molecular composition resin.8 is concerned, it is commonly accepted that the In this study we carry out straining exper- extent to which phase separation in the elas- iments and simultaneously monitor the evo- tomer takes place depends on: i) the distribu- lution of its morphology by small-angle X- tion of hard and soft chain segments along the ray scattering (SAXS). To quantify the afore- chain, ii) the polarity difference or the compat- mentioned extra disorder in the already irreg- ibility between hard and soft chain segments ular topology of PU is difficult even if scat- and iii) the ability of the hard-segments to stack tering methods are employed. Here it may tightly and to establish strong intra-molecular help to project the scattering data back into interactions. Another generalization concern- real space using procedures similar to those ing phase separation may be that the larger the used in computed tomography. In a paral- difference between the glass transition temper- lel study9 of machine-processed thermoplastic atures of the soft and hard segment rich do- polyurethane (TPU) we have described mor- mains is, the higher is the extent of phase seg- phological peculiarities that have become vis- regation between the phases. This fact also re- ible after such a transformation. They have flects differences in polarity between the hard been related to excellent homogeneity of the and soft chain segments.1 mixing3 in the machine process and the ad- When TPUs are synthesized in a one-shot dressed primary variability of block sequence. method, the raw components are simply stirred Now we investigate corresponding hand-cast together. On a large scale, the process is car- material. ried out by machines (machine processing). Compared to machine-processed TPU the "Hand-casting" refers to a process in which morphology of hand-cast material resembles the components are poured into a bucket2 and an ensemble of particles which are almost un- stirred. In such a "bucket and paddle mix",3 the correlated. In this study we propose a proce- mixing quality may remain moderate. In other dure to strip the small effect of correlations words, at different places in the bucket copoly- from the scattering data by fitting, and thus to
2 extract information on the ensemble of the un- tent is calculated according to correlated particles.10 As a function of strain nchainextender Mchainextender + Mdiisocyanate one expects that the hard domains appear rigid, HSC = m and that the gaps formed by the soft domains total expand with strain. As this feasibility test whilst neglecting the second terminal diiso- is passed we determine the variation of hard- cyanate. domain volume in the strain test and find a rela- Wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) scans 5, 11 tion to one of the ultimate properties of the of the isotropic materials have been carried materials. To the best of our knowledge nei- out in a powder diffractometer X‘Pert Pro ther the variation of the hard domain content MPD manufactured by PANalytical in Bragg- during straining nor its relation to the strain at Brentano geometry with a wavelength λ = break has been quantified before. 0.1542 nm (Cu-kα ). The scans cover the an- gular range 2° ≤ 2θ ≤ 42°. 2θ is the scattering angle. 2 Experimental 2.2 Tensile testing 2.1 Materials Tests are run in a self-made20 machine. A grid of fiducial marks is printed21 on test bars We study thermoplastic polyurethanes (TPU) S3 (DIN 50125). The sample thickness is made from different components. The hard ts0 ≈ 2mm. The sample width is 2 mm. The segments of all materials are made from clamping length is 22.5 mm. Signals from 4,4’-methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI). the transducer are recorded during the exper- The chain extenders are 1,4-butane diol (BD) iment. The sample is monitored by a TV- or hydroquinone bis(2-hydroxyethyl) ether camera. Video frames are grabbed every 12 s (HQEE), respectively. The soft segments and are stored together with the experimental are either made from polytetrahydrofuran data. The machine is operated at a cross-head (PTHF®, PTHF is a trade mark of BASF SE), speed of 1 mm/min. Using the fiducial marks, from polycaprolactone (PCL) or from adipic the local macroscopic strain ε = (ℓ − ℓ0)/ℓ0 ester (AE). The molar masses of all soft seg- at the position of X-radiation is computed au- ments are very close to Mn ≈1000 Da. tomatically from the initial distance, ℓ0, be- The raw materials have been produced by tween two fiducial marks and the respective BASF and all TPUs have been synthesized by actual distance, ℓ. Processing all the video BASF Polyurethanes Ltd in Lemförde, Ger- frames yields the curve ε (t) as a function of many by hand-casting in a one-shot process.12 the elapsed time. It is very well approximated After curing the materials have been milled and by a quadratic polynomial. The local strain rate ˙ −3 −1 injection molded to sheets of 2 mm thickness. is kept low ε ≈ 1.3×10 s in order to adapt Afterwards they have been matured13–19 by an- to the limitations of the synchrotron beamline. nealing at 100 °C for 20 h. The true stress, σ = F/A, is computed from the force F measured by the load cell after sub- Table 1 presents characterizations of the ma- tracting the force exerted by the upper sample terials. σmax and εb have been determined in separate tensile tests. The reported values for clamp, and from A = A0/(1 + ε), the estimated εb are the maximum values from several re- actual sample cross-section. A0 is the initial peated determinations. The hard segment con- cross section of the central zone of the test bar.
3 Table 1: Samples and their characterization. ρ: mass density, σmax: tensile strength, εb: elon- gation at break, Mw,TPU : weight-average molecular mass of the polymer, Xiso,TPU : isocyanate content of the polymer. All materials share the same hard-segment content HSC=51%. labeling mbt mqt mbl mql mba mqa hard segment MDI MDI MDI MDI MDI MDI chain extender BD HQEE BD HQEE BD HQEE soft segment PTHF PTHF PCL PCL AE AE ρ [g/cm] 1.172 1.185 1.215 1.23 1.239 1.255 Shore D 65 64 71 75 71 74 σmax [MPa] 54 40 42 33 42 34 εb 5.0 4.6 4.9 3.9 5.6 4.7 Mw,T PU [kDa] 88 55 103 54 80 66 Xiso,T PU [%] 0.06 0.10 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.08
The experiments are stopped at ε ≈ 3 when the Because the samples are narrower than the pri- observed SAXS intensity has become too low mary beam, the latter correction has been car- for a quantitative analysis. ried out by V (t)/V0 = 1/(1 + ε (t)). The equa- tion assumes constant sample volume and a sample that is fully immersed in the X-ray 2.3 SAXS monitoring beam. Absorption factors exp(−µts0) of the SAXS is carried out in the synchrotron beam- unstrained samples are determined by mea- line A2 at HASYLAB, Hamburg, Germany. suring the primary beam flux in front of the The wavelength of radiation is λ = 0.15 nm, detector with and without a sample, respec- and the sample-detector distance is 3022 mm. tively. From the result the linear absorption Scattering patterns are collected by a 2D mar- factor, µ, is computed using the known sam- ccd 165 detector (mar research, Norderstedt, ple thickness. Finally the actual absorption Germany) in binned 1024 × 1024 pixel mode factor exp(−µts (t)) that compensates the lat- (pixel size: 158.2 µm × 158.2 µm). Scat- eral thinning as well is assessed using ts (t)= tering patterns are recorded every 132 s with ts0/(1 + ε (t)). The absorption correction is an exposure of 120 s. The patterns I (s) = carried out by dividing the pattern intensity by −1 t (t) followed by the subtraction of the ma- I (s12,s3) cover the region −0.21nm ≤ s −1 chine background. The strain that is associ- s12,s3 ≤ 0.21nm . s = (s12,s3) is the scat- tering vector with its modulus defined by |s| = ated to each scattering pattern is related to the s = (2/λ)sinθ. It is not necessary to empha- time t + te/2 with t being the elapsed time at size the small amount of extrapolated data at the start of the exposure, and te the total ex- the beamstop, because it covers an angular re- posure of the pattern. After these steps the re- gion in which the correlation among the hard sulting scattering patterns are still not in abso- domains has already dropped to zero. The scat- lute units, but their intensities can be compared tering patterns are normalized and background relatively to each other. This pre-evaluation is corrected.22 This means intensity normaliza- carried out automatically by procedures writ- 23 tion for constant primary beam flux, zero ab- ten in PV-WAVE. sorption, and constant irradiated volume V0.
4 22, 30 2.4 SAXS data analysis G1,i (s3), as is described elsewhere. Thus the interference function G (s ) is obtained. Analysis of projections. The best-known 1 3 Its one-dimensional Fourier transform is the projection in the field of scattering maps the longitudinal IDF g (r ). intensity I (s)/V that is normalized to the irra- 1 3 The IDF is fitted26 by a one-dimensional diated volume, V , onto the zero–dimensional model that describes the arrangement of alter- subspace. The resulting number Q is known as nating hard-domain heights and soft-domain “invariant” or “scattering power” heights along the straining direction. Visual inspection of the computed IDFs shows that {I} /V = Q = I (s)/V d3s. 0 ˆ the height distributions of hard domains can be modeled by Gaussian functions and that In a two-phase system Q = the range of correlation among the domains 2 26 vh (1 − vh)(ρh − ρs) is valid with vh the is short. Thus a short-range stacking model volume fraction of hard domains, ρh and ρs with few parameters is chosen, which is a vari- being the electron densities of the hard domain ant of the ideal stacking model.31 The parame- phase and the soft phase, respectively. ters of the model are a weight W that is related Bonart’s longitudinal scattering24 is ob- to the volume fraction of contributing chords tained by not integrating over the whole recip- (cf. Figure 1), average heights H¯h and H¯s of rocal space, but only over planes normal to the hard and soft domains, respectively, and the fiber axis yielding the curve relative standard deviations σh/H¯h and σs/H¯s ∞ of the domain height distributions. An addi- 32, 33 {I}1 (s3)/V = 2π s12 I (s12,s3)/V ds12, tional parameter that skews the Gaussians ˆ0 is present but not discussed here. which is a function of the straining direction s3. Fitted parameters and hard domain vol- {I}1 (s3) is a projection onto a 1D subspace as indicated by subscripting to the pair of braces. ume. By fitting the IDF, we determine the Projections are computed from normalized pat- height distributions Hh (r3) and Hs (r3) of hard terns. and soft domain chords, respectively. The From such projections interface distribution weight parameter of the IDF is defined 22, 25, 26 functions (IDF) g1 (r3) are computed W = H (r ) dr = H (r ) dr. (1) for further analysis. In this way it becomes ˆ h 3 ˆ s 3 possible to quantify several morphological pa- rameters. Let us assume that the hard domains are the Technically, the first step involves subtrac- diluted phase, i.e. that the small-angle scatter- ing counts all the chords which cross all the tion of a guessed constant density fluctuation 27–29 hard domains (in the matrix phase there may be background, IFl, from the measured curve chords which are so long that they will not be 2 2 and multiplication by 4π s3 to apply the sec- counted). Without loss of generality we con- ond derivative in reciprocal space. The result sider a single hard domain. Figure 1 shows a is an intermediate interference function sketch of this hard domain intersected by its chords. Obviously, the volume Vh of the hard 2 2 G1,i (s3) = ({I}1 (s3)/V − IFl) 4π s3. domain is V = dσ l (r ,r )dr dr = dσ r H (r )dr , The final background is constructed by appli- h ¨ 1 2 1 2 ˆ 3 h 3 3 cation of a narrow low-pass frequency filter to (2)
5 dσ polytetrahydrofuran PTHF® polyols and 1,4-