DOCSLIB.ORG

Local-First Software:You Own Your Data, In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local-First Software:You Own Your Data, In Local-First Software: You Own Your Data, in spite of the Cloud Martin Kleppmann Adam Wiggins Department of Computer Science and Technology Ink & Switch University of Cambridge Berlin, Germany Cambridge, United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] Peter van Hardenberg Mark McGranaghan Ink & Switch Ink & Switch San Francisco, CA, USA Seattle, WA, USA [email protected] [email protected] Abstract Keywords collaboration software, mobile computing, data Cloud apps like Google Docs and Trello are popular because ownership, CRDTs, peer-to-peer communication they enable real-time collaboration with colleagues, and they make it easy for us to access our work from all of our devices. However, by centralizing data storage on servers, cloud apps ACM Reference Format: also take away ownership and agency from users. If a service Martin Kleppmann, Adam Wiggins, Peter van Hardenberg, and Mark shuts down, the software stops functioning, and data created McGranaghan. 2019. Local-First Software: You Own Your Data, in with that software is lost. spite of the Cloud. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGPLAN In- ternational Symposium on New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflec- In this article we propose local-first software, a set of prin- tions on Programming and Software (Onward! ’19), October 23–24, ciples for software that enables both collaboration and own- 2019, Athens, Greece. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 25 pages. https: ership for users. Local-first ideals include the ability to work //doi.org/10.1145/3359591.3359737 offline and collaborate across multiple devices, while also improving the security, privacy, long-term preservation, and user control of data. We survey existing approaches to data storage and sharing, ranging from email attachments to web apps to Firebase- backed mobile apps, and we examine the trade-offs of each. 1 Motivation: Collaboration and We look at Conflict-free Replicated Data Types (CRDTs): Ownership data structures that are multi-user from the ground up while It’s amazing how easily we can collaborate online nowadays. also being fundamentally local and private. CRDTs have We use Google Docs to collaborate on documents, spread- the potential to be a foundational technology for realizing sheets and presentations; in Figma we work together on user local-first software. interface designs; we communicate with colleagues using We share some of our findings from developing local-first Slack; we track tasks in Trello; and so on. We depend on software prototypes at the Ink & Switch research lab over these and many other online services, e.g. for taking notes, the course of several years. These experiments test the via- planning projects or events, remembering contacts, and a bility of CRDTs in practice, and explore the user interface whole raft of business uses. challenges for this new data model. Lastly, we suggest some We will call these services “cloud apps,” but you could next steps for moving towards local-first software: for re- just as well call them “Software as a Service” (SaaS) or “web- searchers, for app developers, and a startup opportunity for based apps.” What they have in common is that we typically entrepreneurs. access them through a web browser or through mobile apps, and that they store their data on a server. Today’s cloud apps offer big benefits compared to earlier CCS Concepts • Human-centered computing → Col- generations of software: seamless collaboration, and being laborative content creation; Ubiquitous and mobile com- able to access data from any device. As we run more and puting systems and tools; • Computer systems organiza- more of our lives and work through these cloud apps, they tion → Peer-to-peer architectures; • Software and its engi- become more and more critical to us. The more time we neering → Peer-to-peer architectures; Organizing principles invest in using one of these apps, the more valuable the data for web applications. in it becomes to us. Onward! ’19, October 23–24, 2019, Athens, Greece Martin Kleppmann, Adam Wiggins, Peter van Hardenberg, and Mark McGranaghan However, in our research we have spoken to a lot of cre- you can do anything you like, including long-term archiv- ative professionals,1 and in that process we have also learned ing, making backups, manipulating the files using other pro- about the downsides of cloud apps. grams, or deleting the files if you no longer want them. You When you have put a lot of creative energy and effort don’t need anybody’s permission to access your files, since into making something, you tend to have a deep emotional they are yours. You don’t have to depend on servers operated attachment to it. If you do creative work, this probably seems by another company. familiar. (When we say “creative work,” we mean not just To sum up: the cloud gives us collaboration, but old-fash- visual art, or music, or poetry — many other activities, such ioned apps give us ownership. Can’t we have the best of both as explaining a technical topic, implementing an intricate worlds? We would like both the convenient cross-device algorithm, designing a user interface, or figuring out how to access and real-time collaboration provided by cloud apps, lead a team towards some goal are also creative efforts.) and also the personal ownership of your own data embodied In the process of performing that creative work, you typi- by “old-fashioned” software. cally produce files and data: documents, presentations, spread- sheets, code, notes, drawings, and so on. And you will want 2 Seven Ideals for Local-first Software to keep that data: for reference and inspiration in the future, to include it in a portfolio, or simply to archive because you We believe that data ownership and real-time collaboration feel proud of it. It is important to feel ownership of that data, are not at odds with each other. It is possible to create soft- ware that has all the advantages of cloud apps, while also because the creative expression is something so personal. allowing you to retain full ownership of the data, documents Unfortunately, cloud apps are problematic in this regard. Although they let you access your data anywhere, all data and files you create. local-first software access must go via the server, and you can only do the things We call this type of software , since it that the server will let you do. In a sense, you don’t have full prioritizes the use of local storage (the disk built into your ownership of that data — the cloud provider does.2 In the computer) and local networks (such as your home WiFi) over servers in remote datacenters. words of a bumper sticker [132]: “There is no cloud, it’s just In cloud apps, the data on the server is treated as the someone else’s computer.” When data is stored on “someone else’s computer”, that primary, authoritative copy of the data; if a client has a copy third party assumes a degree of control over that data. Cloud of the data, it is merely a cache that is subordinate to the apps are provided as a service; if the service is unavailable, server. Any data modification must be sent to the server, you cannot use the software, and you can no longer access otherwise it “didn’t happen.” In local-first applications we swap these roles: we treat the copy of the data on your local your data created with that software. If the service shuts device — your laptop, tablet, or phone — as the primary copy. down, even though you might be able to export your data, without the servers there is normally no way for you to Servers still exist, but they hold secondary copies of your continue running your own copy of that software. Thus, you data in order to assist with access from multiple devices. are at the mercy of the company providing the service. As we shall see, this change in perspective has profound Before web apps came along, we had what we might call implications. Here are seven ideals to strive for in local-first software. “old-fashioned” apps: programs running on your local com- puter, reading and writing files on the local disk. We still use a lot of applications of this type today: text editors and IDEs, 2.1 No Spinners: Your Work at Your Fingertips Git and other version control systems, and many specialized Much of today’s software feels slower than previous gen- software packages such as graphics applications or CAD erations of software [91]. Even though CPUs have become software fall in this category.3 ever faster, there is often a perceptible delay between some In old-fashioned apps, the data lives in files on your local user input (e.g. clicking a button, or hitting a key) and the disk, so you have full agency and ownership of that data: corresponding result appearing on the display. In previous work [95] we measured the performance of modern software 1Our research on software that supports the creative process is discussed and analyzed why these delays occur. further in our articles “Capstone, a tablet for thinking” [81] and “The iPad With cloud apps, since the primary copy of the data is as a fast, precise tool for creativity” [135]. 2We use the term “ownership” not in the sense of intellectual property law on a server, all data modifications, and many data lookups, and copyright, but rather as the creator’s perceived relationship to their require a round-trip to a server. Depending on where you data. We discuss this notion further in Section 2.7. live, the server may well be located on another continent, so 3The software we are talking about in this article are apps for creating the speed of light places a limit on how fast the software can documents or files (such as text, graphics, spreadsheets, CAD drawings, or be (see Figure1).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Efficient Algorithms for Comparing, Storing, and Sharing
    EFFICIENT ALGORITHMS FOR COMPARING, STORING, AND SHARING LARGE COLLECTIONS OF EVOLUTIONARY TREES A Dissertation by SUZANNE JUDE MATTHEWS Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2012 Major Subject: Computer Science EFFICIENT ALGORITHMS FOR COMPARING, STORING, AND SHARING LARGE COLLECTIONS OF EVOLUTIONARY TREES A Dissertation by SUZANNE JUDE MATTHEWS Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Tiffani L. Williams Committee Members, Nancy M. Amato Jennifer L. Welch James B. Woolley Head of Department, Hank W. Walker May 2012 Major Subject: Computer Science iii ABSTRACT Efficient Algorithms for Comparing, Storing, and Sharing Large Collections of Evolutionary Trees. (May 2012) Suzanne Jude Matthews, B.S.; M.S., Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Tiffani L. Williams Evolutionary relationships between a group of organisms are commonly summarized in a phylogenetic (or evolutionary) tree. The goal of phylogenetic inference is to infer the best tree structure that represents the relationships between a group of organisms, given a set of observations (e.g. molecular sequences). However, popular heuristics for inferring phylogenies output tens to hundreds of thousands of equally weighted candidate trees. Biologists summarize these trees into a single structure called the consensus tree. The central assumption is that the information discarded has less value than the information retained. But, what if this assumption is not true? In this dissertation, we demonstrate the value of retaining and studying tree collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Higher Inductive Types (Hits) Are a New Type Former!
    Git as a HIT Dan Licata Wesleyan University 1 1 Darcs Git as a HIT Dan Licata Wesleyan University 1 1 HITs 2 Generator for 2 equality of equality HITs Homotopy Type Theory is an extension of Agda/Coq based on connections with homotopy theory [Hofmann&Streicher,Awodey&Warren,Voevodsky,Lumsdaine,Garner&van den Berg] 2 Generator for 2 equality of equality HITs Homotopy Type Theory is an extension of Agda/Coq based on connections with homotopy theory [Hofmann&Streicher,Awodey&Warren,Voevodsky,Lumsdaine,Garner&van den Berg] Higher inductive types (HITs) are a new type former! 2 Generator for 2 equality of equality HITs Homotopy Type Theory is an extension of Agda/Coq based on connections with homotopy theory [Hofmann&Streicher,Awodey&Warren,Voevodsky,Lumsdaine,Garner&van den Berg] Higher inductive types (HITs) are a new type former! They were originally invented[Lumsdaine,Shulman,…] to model basic spaces (circle, spheres, the torus, …) and constructions in homotopy theory 2 Generator for 2 equality of equality HITs Homotopy Type Theory is an extension of Agda/Coq based on connections with homotopy theory [Hofmann&Streicher,Awodey&Warren,Voevodsky,Lumsdaine,Garner&van den Berg] Higher inductive types (HITs) are a new type former! They were originally invented[Lumsdaine,Shulman,…] to model basic spaces (circle, spheres, the torus, …) and constructions in homotopy theory But they have many other applications, including some programming ones! 2 Generator for 2 equality of equality Patches Patch a a 2c2 diff b d = < b c c --- > d 3 3 id a a b b
    [Show full text]
  • DVCS Or a New Way to Use Version Control Systems for Freebsd
    Brief history of VCS FreeBSD context & gures Is Arch/baz suited for FreeBSD? Mercurial to the rescue New processes & policies needed Conclusions DVCS or a new way to use Version Control Systems for FreeBSD Ollivier ROBERT <[email protected]> BSDCan 2006 Ottawa, Canada May, 12-13th, 2006 Ollivier ROBERT <[email protected]> DVCS or a new way to use Version Control Systems for FreeBSD Brief history of VCS FreeBSD context & gures Is Arch/baz suited for FreeBSD? Mercurial to the rescue New processes & policies needed Conclusions Agenda 1 Brief history of VCS 2 FreeBSD context & gures 3 Is Arch/baz suited for FreeBSD? 4 Mercurial to the rescue 5 New processes & policies needed 6 Conclusions Ollivier ROBERT <[email protected]> DVCS or a new way to use Version Control Systems for FreeBSD Brief history of VCS FreeBSD context & gures Is Arch/baz suited for FreeBSD? Mercurial to the rescue New processes & policies needed Conclusions The ancestors: SCCS, RCS File-oriented Use a subdirectory to store deltas and metadata Use lock-based architecture Support shared developments through NFS (fragile) SCCS is proprietary (System V), RCS is Open Source a SCCS clone exists: CSSC You can have a central repository with symlinks (RCS) Ollivier ROBERT <[email protected]> DVCS or a new way to use Version Control Systems for FreeBSD Brief history of VCS FreeBSD context & gures Is Arch/baz suited for FreeBSD? Mercurial to the rescue New processes & policies needed Conclusions CVS, the de facto VCS for the free world Initially written as shell wrappers over RCS then rewritten in C Centralised server Easy UI Use sandboxes to avoid locking Simple 3-way merges Can be replicated through CVSup or even rsync Extensive documentation (papers, websites, books) Free software and used everywhere (SourceForge for example) Ollivier ROBERT <[email protected]> DVCS or a new way to use Version Control Systems for FreeBSD Brief history of VCS FreeBSD context & gures Is Arch/baz suited for FreeBSD? Mercurial to the rescue New processes & policies needed Conclusions CVS annoyances and aws BUT..
    [Show full text]
  • Darcs 2.0.0 (2.0.0 (+ 75 Patches)) Darcs
    Darcs 2.0.0 (2.0.0 (+ 75 patches)) Darcs David Roundy April 23, 2008 2 Contents 1 Introduction 7 1.1 Features . 9 1.2 Switching from CVS . 11 1.3 Switching from arch . 12 2 Building darcs 15 2.1 Prerequisites . 15 2.2 Building on Mac OS X . 16 2.3 Building on Microsoft Windows . 16 2.4 Building from tarball . 16 2.5 Building darcs from the repository . 17 2.6 Building darcs with git . 18 2.7 Submitting patches to darcs . 18 3 Getting started 19 3.1 Creating your repository . 19 3.2 Making changes . 20 3.3 Making your repository visible to others . 20 3.4 Getting changes made to another repository . 21 3.5 Moving patches from one repository to another . 21 3.5.1 All pulls . 21 3.5.2 Send and apply manually . 21 3.5.3 Push . 22 3.5.4 Push —apply-as . 22 3.5.5 Sending signed patches by email . 23 3.6 Reducing disk space usage . 26 3.6.1 Linking between repositories . 26 3.6.2 Alternate formats for the pristine tree . 26 4 Configuring darcs 29 4.1 prefs . 29 4.2 Environment variables . 32 4.3 General-purpose variables . 33 4.4 Remote repositories . 34 3 4 CONTENTS 4.5 Highlighted output . 36 4.6 Character escaping and non-ASCII character encodings . 36 5 Best practices 39 5.1 Introduction . 39 5.2 Creating patches . 39 5.2.1 Changes . 40 5.2.2 Keeping or discarding changes . 40 5.2.3 Unrecording changes .
    [Show full text]
  • Distributed Versioning for Everyone
    Distributed versioning for everyone Distributed versioning for everyone Nicolas Pouillard [email protected] March 20, 2008 Nicolas Pouillard Distributed versioning for everyoneMarch 20, 2008 1 / 48 Distributed versioning for everyone Introduction Outline 1 Introduction 2 Principles of Distributed Versioning 3 Darcs is one of them 4 Conclusion Nicolas Pouillard Distributed versioning for everyoneMarch 20, 2008 2 / 48 Distributed versioning for everyone Introduction SCM: “Source Code Manager” Keeps track of changes to source code so you can track down bugs and work collaboratively. Most famous example: CVS Numerous acronyms: RCS, SCM, VCS DSCM: Distributed Source Code Manager Nicolas Pouillard Distributed versioning for everyoneMarch 20, 2008 3 / 48 Distributed versioning for everyone Introduction Purpose What’s the purpose of this presentation Show the importance of the distributed feature Enrich your toolbox with a DSCM Exorcize rumors about darcs Show how DSCM are adapted for personal use What’s not the purpose of it A flame against other DSCMs A precise darcs tutorial A real explanation of the Theory of patches Nicolas Pouillard Distributed versioning for everyoneMarch 20, 2008 4 / 48 Distributed versioning for everyone Principles of Distributed Versioning Outline 1 Introduction 2 Principles of Distributed Versioning 3 Darcs is one of them 4 Conclusion Nicolas Pouillard Distributed versioning for everyoneMarch 20, 2008 5 / 48 Distributed versioning for everyone Principles of Distributed Versioning Distributed rather than centralized
    [Show full text]
  • Version Control
    Génie Logiciel Avancé Cours 7 — Version Control Stefano Zacchiroli [email protected] Laboratoire PPS, Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 5 mai 2011 URL http://upsilon.cc/zack/teaching/1011/gla/ Copyright © 2011 Stefano Zacchiroli License Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Stefano Zacchiroli (Paris 7) Version Control 5 mai 2011 1 / 58 Disclaimer slides in English interactive demos Stefano Zacchiroli (Paris 7) Version Control 5 mai 2011 2 / 58 Sommaire 1 Version control Configuration management diff & patch Version control concepts Brief history of version control systems 2 Revision Control System (RCS) 3 Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 4 Subversion 5 Git 6 References Stefano Zacchiroli (Paris 7) Version Control 5 mai 2011 3 / 58 Sommaire 1 Version control Configuration management diff & patch Version control concepts Brief history of version control systems 2 Revision Control System (RCS) 3 Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 4 Subversion 5 Git 6 References Stefano Zacchiroli (Paris 7) Version Control 5 mai 2011 4 / 58 Sommaire 1 Version control Configuration management diff & patch Version control concepts Brief history of version control systems 2 Revision Control System (RCS) 3 Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 4 Subversion 5 Git 6 References Stefano Zacchiroli (Paris 7) Version Control 5 mai 2011 5 / 58 Change During the life time of a software project, everything changes : bugs are discovered and have to be fixed (code) system requirements change and need to be implemented external dependencies (e.g. new version of hardware and software you depend upon) change competitors might catch up most software systems can be thought of as a set of evolving versions potentially, each of them has to be maintained concurrently with the others Stefano Zacchiroli (Paris 7) Version Control 5 mai 2011 6 / 58 Configuration management Definition (Configuration Management) Configuration Management (CM) is concerned with the policies, processes, and tools for managing changing software systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Continuous Integration for Decentralised Development of Service-Based Software Systems
    Continuous Integration for Decentralised Development of Service-Based Software Systems by Jameel Almalki Thesis Submitted to Flinders University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy College of Science and Engineering 9th August 2018 Declaration I certify that this thesis does not include any prior material submitted for a degree or diploma in any university without acknowledgment; and to the best of my knowledge and belief it does not include any prior material published or written by another individual with the exception of where due reference is used in the text. Jameel Almalki July 30th, 2018 2 Acknowledgements Firstly and most importantly, I want to thank Allah Almighty for giving me blessings, opportunities, strength and guidance to endure this challenging task to the end. My unreserved appreciation and gratitude go to my parents and my brothers and sisters for their continuous support, prayers and encouragement, which gave me the strength to succeed in my PhD research journey. May Allah bless you all. My greatest indebtedness is to my wife, Hamdah, for her endless love, support, patience and sacrifice while I have been consumed with this research in recent years. My thanks and love are also extended to my two precious daughters, Diala and Ladan, and my son, Elias, for all the joy and love in my life. Thank you very much, you are indeed my treasures. I also would like to express my deepest gratitude and appreciation to my supervisor, Dr. Haifeng Shen, for his enthusiastic support, insightful suggestions and valuable guidance throughout this research. Certainly, without his encouragement, invaluable knowledge and support this work would never have been completed.
    [Show full text]
  • David's Advanced Revision Control System
    Hazırlık Darcs Hakkında Pratik Okuma Odevi¨ David’s Advanced Revision Control System Can Burak C¸ilingir1 1Istanbul˙ Bilgi Universitesi¨ Bilgisayar Bilimleri B¨ol¨um¨u [email protected] 5 S¸ubat 2007 Can Burak C¸ilingir Darcs Hazırlık Darcs Hakkında Versiyon Y¨onetimi Pratik Ge¸cmi¸s Okuma Odevi¨ Ne zaman bitecek? 1 Hazırlık Versiyon Y¨onetimi Ge¸cmi¸s 2 Darcs Hakkında 3 Pratik 4 Okuma Odevi¨ Can Burak C¸ilingir Darcs Hazırlık Darcs Hakkında Versiyon Y¨onetimi Pratik Ge¸cmi¸s Okuma Odevi¨ neye yarar? Can Burak C¸ilingir Darcs Hazırlık Darcs Hakkında Versiyon Y¨onetimi Pratik Ge¸cmi¸s Okuma Odevi¨ Aegis, ArX, Arch, BitKeeper, CM Synergy, CVS, Code Co-Op, Codeville, IBM Rational ClearCase, Mercurial, Monotone, OpenCM Perforce, PureCM, RCS, Subversion, Superversion, Vesta, Visual SourceSafe, bazaar-ng, git, monotone, svk http://better-scm.berlios.de/comparison/ http://zooko.com/revision control quick ref.html Can Burak C¸ilingir Darcs Hazırlık Darcs Hakkında Versiyon Y¨onetimi Pratik Ge¸cmi¸s Okuma Odevi¨ Aegis, ArX, Arch, BitKeeper, CM Synergy, CVS, Code Co-Op, Codeville, IBM Rational ClearCase, Mercurial, Monotone, OpenCM Perforce, PureCM, RCS, Subversion, Superversion, Vesta, Visual SourceSafe, bazaar-ng, git, monotone, svk http://better-scm.berlios.de/comparison/ http://zooko.com/revision control quick ref.html Can Burak C¸ilingir Darcs Hazırlık Darcs Hakkında Versiyon Y¨onetimi Pratik Ge¸cmi¸s Okuma Odevi¨ rcs Revision Control System, tek ki¸si cvs Concurrent Versioning System, birden fazla ki¸si svn Subversion, daha d¨uzg¨un
    [Show full text]
  • Esa Study Contract Report
    ESA STUDY CONTRACT REPORT ESA Contract No: Subject: Contractor: ESA ITT Number Current and Future Tech- Distributed Systems Group, AO/3-12280/07/NL/CB nologies for Collaborative Vienna University of Tech- Working Environments nology ESA CR() No: No of volumes: 1 Contractor’s Reference: This Volume No: 1 TEUN Abstract: This document reports the final, detailed result of the study on current and future technologies for collaborative working environments (CWEs). The goal of this study is to analyze current CWEs and whether they and their future trends are suitable for large- scale multinational organizations. To this end, we have analyzed the structure of large-scale organizations in general, and of ESA in particular, with respect to organization, geographical distribution, and IT environments. Requirements for CWEs used in collaborative work are presented. Based on an initial list of criteria given by ESA, we have revised and extended the list to introduce a comprehensive set of criteria for evaluating CWEs. The state-of-the- art CWEs are discussed and classified. We have selected 15 representative CWE products and evaluated and compared them in detail. From the evaluation and comparison of CWE products, we have presented our findings of current issues and future trends of CWEs. In particular, existing products provide many features required by large-scale and multinational organizations but those features are not well-integrated into a single system. Due to the complexity of collaborative work within those organizations, often many CWEs are used in parallel and it is not easy to integrate those CWEs together. The work described in this report was done under ESA Contract.
    [Show full text]
  • Version Control with Git Why Using Version Control?
    Version control with Git Why using version control? • Backup • Easy experimentation with parallel branches • Collaboration across teams • e.g. All of Google’s code lies in one repository • Formal software development process • Tagging of releases • Continuous integration • Pull requests, code reviews Duckietown 2 History of (non-proprietary) version control systems • 1970s: Print everything out. Duckietown 3 History of (non-proprietary) version control systems • 1990s: CVS • Independent history for each single ile. • 2000: Subversion • Client-server architecture. • Repository snapshots, introductions of branches. • 2005: Distributed Version Control (Git, Mercurial, Darcs, Bazaar, …) • Peer-to-peer network of replicated copies. • 2010s: Services on top (Github, Gitlab, …) • Issue tracking, pull requests, continuous integration, … Duckietown 4 Git • Created by Linus Torvalds (1969-, Finnish), author of Linux • Created for Linux kernel development Duckietown 5 Git • Created by Linus Torvalds (1969-, Finnish), author of Linux • Created for Linux kernel development When asked why [Linus Torvalds] called the new software, "git," British slang meaning "a rotten person," he said: “I'm an egotistical bastard, so I name all my projects after myself. First Linux, now git." source Duckietown 6 Jedi knights build their own lightsabers Duckietown 7 A roboticist’s output is typically limited by tools • Learn to use the tools that you have. • Modify the tools to it your needs. • Create new tools. • Learn enough to be able to create the tools that you need. Duckietown 8 Commit graph Duckietown 9 Commit graph master Duckietown 10 Duckietown 11 Git explained with dynamical systems Dynamical system Version control / “patch theory” state Commit graph command transition Patches function hash function (pretend injective) Duckietown 12 “Git Flow” branching model • Git does not impose any semantics on the branches.
    [Show full text]
  • Bill Laboon Friendly Introduction Version Control: a Brief History
    Git and GitHub: A Bill Laboon Friendly Introduction Version Control: A Brief History ❖ In the old days, you could make a copy of your code at a certain point, and release it ❖ You could then continue working on your code, adding features, fixing bugs, etc. ❖ But this had several problems! VERSION 1 VERSION 2 Version Control: A Brief History ❖ Working with others was difficult - if you both modified the same file, it could be very difficult to fix! ❖ Reviewing changes from “Release n” to “Release n + 1” could be very time-consuming, if not impossible ❖ Modifying code locally meant that a crash could take out much of your work Version Control: A Brief History ❖ So now we have version control - a way to manage our source code in a regular way. ❖ We can tag releases without making a copy ❖ We can have numerous “save points” in case our modifications need to be unwound ❖ We can easily distribute our code across multiple machines ❖ We can easily merge work from different people to the same codebase Version Control ❖ There are many kinds of version control out there: ❖ BitKeeper, Perforce, Subversion, Visual SourceSafe, Mercurial, IBM ClearCase, AccuRev, AutoDesk Vault, Team Concert, Vesta, CVSNT, OpenCVS, Aegis, ArX, Darcs, Fossil, GNU Arch, BitKeeper, Code Co-Op, Plastic, StarTeam, MKS Integrity, Team Foundation Server, PVCS, DCVS, StarTeam, Veracity, Razor, Sun TeamWare, Code Co-Op, SVK, Fossil, Codeville, Bazaar…. ❖ But we will discuss git and its most popular repository hosting service, GitHub What is git? ❖ Developed by Linus Torvalds ❖ Strong support for distributed development ❖ Very fast ❖ Very efficient ❖ Very resistant against data corruption ❖ Makes branching and merging easy ❖ Can run over various protocols Git and GitHub ❖ git != GitHub ❖ git is the software itself - GitHub is just a place to store it, and some web-based tools to help with development.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy of the Deployment Pipeline
    Many of the designations used by manufacturers and sellers to distinguish their products are claimed as trademarks. Where those designations appear in this book, and the publisher was aware of a trademark claim, the designations have been printed with initial capital letters or in all capitals. The authors and publisher have taken care in the preparation of this book, but make no expressed or implied warranty of any kind and assume no responsibility for errors or omissions. No liability is assumed for incidental or consequential damages in connection with or arising out of the use of the information or programs contained herein. The publisher offers excellent discounts on this book when ordered in quantity for bulk purchases or special sales, which may include electronic versions and/or custom covers and content particular to your business, training goals, marketing focus, and branding interests. For more information, please contact: U.S. Corporate and Government Sales (800) 382–3419 [email protected] For sales outside the United States please contact: International Sales [email protected] Visit us on the Web: informit.com/aw Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data: Humble, Jez. Continuous delivery : reliable software releases through build, test, and deployment automation / Jez Humble, David Farley. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-321-60191-9 (hardback : alk. paper) 1. Computer software--Development. 2. Computer software--Reliability. 3. Computer software--Testing. I. Farley, David, 1959- II. Title. QA76.76.D47H843 2010 005.1--dc22 2010022186 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America.
    [Show full text]