A Pivotal Period for the Forests of the South West of Western Australia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Proceedings 6th National Conference of the Australian Forest History Society Inc, Michael Calver et al. (eds) © 2005 Millpress, Rotterdam, ISBN 90 5966 026 9 1919 to 1935: A pivotal period for the forests of the south west of Western Australia J. Williamson & S. Moore School of Environmental Science, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia C. Warren School of Asian Studies, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia Peer reviewed contribution Keywords: State Forest, Hutchins, Lane Poole, Kessell, Forests Act 1918, forest values ABSTRACT: With the passing of the new Forests Act in December 1918 and with a scientifically trained forester in charge, the new Forests Department set out with enthusiasm to redress the chaos caused by the previous 90 years of virtually uncontrolled exploitation of the forests of the south west of Western Australia. The objectives and accomplishments of those sixteen years have had a major influence on the character and extent of today’s forests. 1 INTRODUCTION The dramatic improvement in caring for the forested areas of the south west of Western Australia from 1919 to 1935 can be attributed to three men – Hutchins, Lane Poole and Kessell – each a scientifically trained forester. This was an era dominated by the vision of Jimmy Mitchell, the member of parliament for Northam and twice premier of the state, who hoped that the south west of Western Australia would become the food bowl of the world and who believed that “man’s noblest work was to increase production, and that rural production was morally and economically superior to any other factor” (Bolton 1972:13). Mitchell was Minister for Agriculture from 1906–1911, and Premier from 1919– 1924 and again from 1930–1933. Forested land was considered by Mitchell to be an impediment to the fulfilment of his vision. He wanted it cleared for agriculture and settlement. The recommendations of Hutchins, and the achievements of Lane Poole and Kessell against Mitchell’s opposing vision are therefore all the more commendable. New policies and practices initiated during the sixteen-year period, from 1919–1935, had a major influence on the establishment of sustainable forestry practice in Western Australia. Not only was 70% of today’s area of secure forest reserved, but regeneration and silvicultural practices were also widely introduced. In addition the following important aspects of forestry were initiated or continued: � Fire management was initiated; � Tree marking under group selection replaced minimum girth as the means of controlling cutting; � Working plans for each area of native forest were initiated; � Pine plantations continued to be established and researched. The new Forests Act, developed by Lane Poole, was passed by Parliament on 20 December 1918 when Sir Henry Lefroy was Premier and signed into law by Governor MacArtney on 3 January 1919. Led by the enthusiastic Lane Poole, there was a distinct feeling of a new and 503 Millpress koptekst FOREST 1 09-08-2004, 12:37:01 dynamic broom sweeping innovative changes into forest management in Western Australia as a 1.2 The motivation for the Swan River Settlement result of the passing of the Forests Act. In his five-year period as Conservator Lane Poole was keen There is a clear connection between the timber resource of the Swan River region and the reason to get on with regeneration work, fire control, dedicating suitable forested areas as State Forest, and why the British established a settlement on the western part of New Holland. The French and the working towards equating the cut from the forest with what the forest could sustain in the long British were both interested in what was first called The Great South Land, then New Holland and term. In this paper I will expand on these and other objectives and achievements in the period finally Australia. While the French wanted to establish a staging post on the way to both the Spice approximately from 1919 to 1935. Islands and to their interests in the Pacific Ocean, their interest in the west coast of New Holland was, due to the motivation of the Enlightenment, probably more for scientific and cultural 1.1 Who were these three scientifically trained foresters? knowledge than settlement (Marchant 1982). Sir David Hutchins was the pre-eminent forester of the British Empire at the time and a graduate of The British by 1788 had established a colony at Port Jackson on the east coast of New Holland L’Ecole National des Eaux et Forêts, Nancy, France. Commencing in 1824, the forestry school at and wanted to prevent the French, their competitor and often their enemy, from establishing a Nancy was one of the earliest European forestry schools, and one that many British and some colony in the region of the Swan River. The nervousness of the British was understandable as the Australian foresters attended. Hutchins had experience in India, had been Conservator of Cape French had made five major voyages of discovery around that time (La Perouse 1788; Colony and had reported on the forest situation in a number of non-tropical countries. Recently D’Entrecasteaux 1791–1792; Baudin 1801–1804; Freycinet 1817–1820; D’Urville 1822). The retired, Hutchins was invited to visit Australia with the British Association in 1914 and to comment sentiments that prompted the British to establish a settlement at the Swan River were also strongly on Australia’s forestry situation and needs with special reference to Western Australia. Following influenced by the existence of the hardwood forests of the area, expressed in this 1927 account: his visit he made a great many recommendations in his comprehensive 434 page report, published in 1916 by the Forests Department as Bulletin number 5. … the foundation, in 1829 by the British colonial authorities, of a settlement at the entrance to Charles Edward Lane Poole held the Diploma of L’Ecole National des Eaux et Forêts, Nancy, the Swan River was largely due to the reports received in England as to the existence of France. Lane Poole served as Conservator of Forests in Sierra Leone before being appointed, on 25 immense forests of valuable hardwoods in the South-Western portion of what was then September 1916, as Conservator of Forests in Western Australia (the title ‘Inspector General of generally known as New Holland (Kessell 1927:3). Forests” having been amended to Conservator of Forests when he was appointed). Lane Poole was responsible for drafting the 1918 Forests Act. He resigned on 22 October 1921, during Sir James 2 DEDICATION OF STATE FOREST Mitchell’s first term as Premier, and later became Director General of the Commonwealth Forestry and Timber Bureau and the first Principal of the Australian Forestry School. Lane Poole and The forest seemed inexhaustible in the 1800s and early 1900s and was treated as an impediment to Mitchell disagreed over charges to timber companies. Lane Poole wanted an increase in charges to settlement and farming. No wonder that the forest’s major, and perhaps only value, was considered timber concession holders after World War I whereas Mitchell wanted the concession holders to for many years to be for the timber it would yield and, once cleared, the land that would be made continue their low rates until their concession period ended later in the 1920s. Mitchell’s opposition available for settlement and agriculture. The social conditions of forests that were under wealthy was a major factor in Lane Poole’s resignation. private ownership that prevailed in England and Europe and that allowed hunting, did not apply at Stephen Lackey Kessell, was Lane Poole’s successor as Conservator and was also a the Swan River Settlement in the 1800s. The land was owned by the Crown and the emphasis was scientifically trained forester with a degree in forestry from Adelaide University and a Diploma on survival and settlement. (with distinction) in forestry from Oxford University. He carried on Lane Poole’s work with The premier Sir James Mitchell, had a vision that the south west of Western Australia would distinction and diplomacy and remained Conservator from 1923 until 1941 (Mills 2002:359). become the food bowl of the world. After World War I returned servicemen were placed on Group It is worth noting that the achievements in forest management of this period were carried out in Settlement schemes, given an axe and a saw and required to clear and cultivate a specified area the context of few mechanical aids. Trees were felled by hand with an axe and a cross cut saw. each year. The forest was considered an impediment to the fulfillment of Mitchell’s vision. Logs were hauled by teams of horses or bullocks. With the machines of today the relatively small By the late 1800s a slight forest ‘conscienceness’ was developing and some people could see number of staff of the 1920s and 1930s would have been able to achieve even more than they did, that the forest was a valuable resource and would not last long if it was cleared for settlement or creditable as that was. By 1929 there were 507 people employed in the Forests Department agriculture and if cutting continued at the same rate. There was a need to safeguard the best forest compared to the 1018 employed in 1968. areas (Mueller 1879). A land use exercise was needed. In fact a land classification project was commenced in 1916. It was a collaborative effort Table 1. Numbers of people employed by the Forests Department. between Lands Department officers representing agricultural interests and Forests Department officers representing forestry interests. The project classified the forest areas of the south west of Category/Year 1919 1929 1939 1968 Western Australia into four classes: prime timber country; second class timber country; Professional Officers 2 13 18 52 agricultural land; and waste barren land.