DOCSLIB.ORG

Clovis Blade Technology at the Topper Site (38AL23): Assessing Lithic Attribute Variation and Regional Patterns of Technological Organization Douglas A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Clovis Blade Technology at the Topper Site (38AL23): Assessing Lithic Attribute Variation and Regional Patterns of Technological Organization Douglas A University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Occasional Papers – Southeastern Paleoamerican Archaeology and Anthropology, South Carolina Survey Institute of 2012 Clovis Blade Technology at the Topper Site (38AL23): Assessing Lithic Attribute Variation and Regional Patterns of Technological Organization Douglas A. Sain Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/ archanth_occasional_paleoam_papers Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Sain, Douglas A., "Clovis Blade Technology at the Topper Site (38AL23): Assessing Lithic Attribute Variation and Regional Patterns of Technological Organization" (2012). Occasional Papers – Southeastern Paleoamerican Survey. 2. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/archanth_occasional_paleoam_papers/2 This Book is brought to you by the Archaeology and Anthropology, South Carolina Institute of at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occasional Papers – Southeastern Paleoamerican Survey by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Clovis Blade Technology at the Topper Site (38AL23): Assessing Lithic Attribute Variation and Regional Patterns of Technological Organization Douglas A. Sain Occasional Papers 2 2012 Southeastern Paleoamerican Survey South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology University of South Carolina Occasional Papers, Southeastern Paleoamerican Survey, South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of South Carolina Titles in the series 1. Clovis Excavations at Topper 2005–2007: Examining Site Formation Processes at an Upland Paleoindian Site along the Middle Savannah River, by D. Shane Miller. 2010 2. Clovis Blade Technology at the Topper Site (38AL23): Assessing Lithic Attribute Variation and Regional Patterns of Technological Organization, by Douglas A. Sain. 2012 Instructions for Authors Prospective authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts for consideration for publication in this series. These manuscripts will be evaluated on the basis of their technical merit and relevance to the goals of the Southeastern Paleoamerican Survey (SEPAS) by the series editor and other members of the SEPAS research team. Upon a decision to proceed, manuscripts will be sent to two outside experts for formal peer review. All submitted manuscripts must conform to American Antiquity formatting guidelines for text, references, and figures. Manuscript submissions must be made electronically, in pdf or word processing format. This series publishes original manuscripts. Prospective authors are cautioned not to submit papers that have been submitted, accepted, or published elsewhere. Inquiries about possible publications should be sent to the series editor at the address below. David G. Anderson, Ph.D., RPA Professor, Department of Anthropology The University of Tennessee 250 South Stadium Hall Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-0720 [email protected] <[email protected]> Clovis Blade Technology at the Topper Site (38AL23): Assessing Lithic Attribute Variation and Regional Patterns of Technological Organization Douglas A. Sain 2012 Occasional Papers 2 Southeastern Paleoamerican Survey South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology University of South Carolina Acknowledgements This research was not possible without the guidance and support of many individuals. I thank the members of my committee for their time, patience and efforts. Dr. David Kilby served as my committee chair. Through him I have gained much insight into Paleoindian archaeology and archaeological field techniques. Dr. John Montgomery introduced me to archaeological method and theory, and taught me how to keep my writing concise. Dr. David Batten shared his editorial and organizational advice. I would also like to thank Dr. Phillip Shelley. He introduced me to lithic analysis and the field of geoarchaeology. Dr. Stephen Durand, as my advisor, gave his time, intellect, and patience in assisting me with advice, and answering any questions I approached with during this research. I would like to thank Dr. Al Goodyear of the South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology for providing me with access to the archaeological collections housed at the South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology (SCIAA). Through his guidance and suggestions regarding my analysis, I have learned a great deal. I thank the faculty of the Anthropology department at Eastern New Mexico University for providing me with the space necessary to conduct and complete my analysis. I thank the many staff, visiting lecturers, and volunteers that frequent the Topper Site and Southeastern Paleoamerican Survey for offering their intellectual input: D. Shane Miller, Ashley Smallwood, Dr. David G. Anderson, Derek Anderson, Andy Hemmings, Dennis Stanford, William Andrefsky, and Tom Pertierra. The help and insight of many fellow graduate students, peers, and colleagues was also beneficial to the final product. I would like to thank Jessica Beltman for her time and dedication in assisting me with the photography, design, and visual layout involved in the final version of this monograph. Finally, I would like to thank the editorial advice of two anonymous reviewers. Their comments greatly enhanced the final product. To the people I have listed above, and many others that I am sure to have missed, I am utmost grateful. i Foreword It is a pleasure to introduce this monograph by Douglas A. Sain, which is based on his master’s thesis research on the organization of Clovis blade technology. This second monograph of the Occasional Papers series of the Southeastern Paleoamerican Survey closely follows the first in terms of the meticulousness of the study, and the new information it provides about the Topper Site. Detailed studies of Clovis material are eagerly sought by Paleoindian archaeologists, enthusiasts, and particularly by lithic analysts. Sain provides a well-rounded literature review for these groups, and an innovative approach to identifying technological blades. The “mixed assemblage” problem resulting when multiple lithic technologies were used at a single site is one with which lithic analysts continue to struggle. With a quarry site such as Topper and the wide variety of core forms and tools recovered, a nuanced and consistent approach to blade identification is a necessity if one wants to consider broader questions of technological organization. Recognizing variability in the end-product of blade manufacture and the relative importance of some characteristics over others, Sain weights six attributes from three to one and through detailed study of individual detached pieces produces a score. With a maximum value of 12, those with a score of seven or higher are considered a blade. This provides a consistent, replicable procedure for separating blades from blade-like flakes, and using these data in the consideration of Clovis lifeways. The small percentage of blades at Topper with modification, when coupled with a consideration of assemblages in the local and broader region, provide evidence that blades were part of a curated technology and toolkit, a transportable and reliable product that could be maintained as people moved across the landscape. This work provides a specific reconstruction of Clovis technological organization in the Savannah River Valley, and should inspire broader considerations of blade technology elsewhere in the Americas. Philip J. Carr, Professor Department of Sociology, Anthropology, & Social Work University of South Alabama ii Table of Contents Foreword Acknowledgments Chapter I. Introduction ...............................................................................................1 Chapter II. The Clovis Culture .....................................................................................7 Clovis Origins .......................................................................................10 Clovis Sites ...........................................................................................10 Clovis Subsistence ................................................................................13 Lithic Technology and the Clovis Toolkit ............................................13 Technological Organization and Models of Mobility ...........................15 Chapter III. Clovis Blade Technology and History of Research ...............................20 Blade Manufacture ................................................................................20 Blade Research......................................................................................34 Archaeological Evidence ......................................................................34 Chapter IV. Regional Context and Site Setting ..........................................................42 Site Setting ............................................................................................44 Excavation History................................................................................45 The Topper Lithic Assemblage .............................................................51 Chapter V. Research Design .......................................................................................53 Blade Analysis ......................................................................................54 Core Analysis ........................................................................................63 Chapter VI. Analytical Results.....................................................................................66
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Late Mississippian Ceramic Production on St
    LATE MISSISSIPPIAN CERAMIC PRODUCTION ON ST. CATHERINES ISLAND, GEORGIA Anna M. Semon A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology. Chapel Hill 2019 Approved by: Vincas P. Steponaitis C. Margaret Scarry R. P. Stephen Davis Anna Agbe-Davis John Scarry © 2019 Anna M. Semon ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Anna M. Semon: Late Mississippian Ceramic Production on St. Catherines Island, Georgia (Under the direction of Vincas P. Steponaitis) This dissertation examines Late Mississippian pottery manufacturing on St. Catherines Island, Georgia. Data collected from five ceramic assemblages, three village and two mortuary sites, were used to characterize each ceramic assemblage and examine small-scale ceramic variations associated with learning and making pottery, which reflect pottery communities of practice. In addition, I examined pottery decorations to investigate social interactions at community and household levels. This dissertation is organized in six chapters. Chapter 1 provides the background, theoretical framework, and objectives of this research. Chapter 2 describes coastal Georgia’s culture history, with focus on the Mississippian period. Chapters 3 and 4 present the methods and results of this study. I use both ceramic typology and attribute analyses to explore ceramic variation. Chapter 3 provides details about the ceramic typology for each site. In addition, I examine the Mississippian surface treatments for each assemblage and identified ceramic changes between middle Irene (A.D. 1350–1450), late Irene (A.D. 1450–1580), and early Mission (A.D. 1580–1600) period.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Major Transitions in the Evolution of Lithic Cutting Edge Production Rates
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Identifying Major Transitions in the Evolution of Lithic Cutting Edge Production Rates Antoine Muller*, Chris Clarkson School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia * [email protected] Abstract The notion that the evolution of core reduction strategies involved increasing efficiency in cutting edge production is prevalent in narratives of hominin technological evolution. Yet a number of studies comparing two different knapping technologies have found no significant differences in edge production. Using digital analysis methods we present an investigation a11111 of raw material efficiency in eight core technologies broadly representative of the long-term evolution of lithic technology. These are bipolar, multiplatform, discoidal, biface, Levallois, prismatic blade, punch blade and pressure blade production. Raw material efficiency is assessed by the ratio of cutting edge length to original core mass. We also examine which flake attributes contribute to maximising raw material efficiency, as well as compare the dif- ference between expert and intermediate knappers in terms of cutting edge produced per OPEN ACCESS gram of core. We identify a gradual increase in raw material efficiency over the broad sweep of lithic technological evolution. The results indicate that the most significant transition in effi- Citation: Muller A, Clarkson C (2016) Identifying Major Transitions in the Evolution of Lithic Cutting ciency likely took place with the introduction of small foliate biface, Levallois and prismatic Edge Production Rates. PLoS ONE 11(12): blade knapping, all introduced in the Middle Stone Age / Middle Palaeolithic among early e0167244. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167244 Homo sapiens and Neanderthals. This suggests that no difference in raw material efficiency Editor: Roberto Macchiarelli, Universite de Poitiers, existed between these species.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Stone and Hunting of Reindeer
    ARCHAEOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT 12 THE USE OF STONE AND HUNTING OF REINDEER By Lena Holm O m University of Umeå ° Ai. ^ Department of Archaeology ARCHAEOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT 12 Distribution: Department of Archaeology, University of Umeå S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden Lena Holm THE USE OF STONE AND HUNTING OF REINDEER A Study of Stone Tool Manufacture and Hunting of Large Mammals in the Central Scandes c. 6 000 - 1 BC. Akademisk avhandling, som för avläggande av filosofie doktors­ examen vid universitetet i Umeå kommer att offentligt för­ svaras i hörsal F, Humanisthuset, Umeå universitet, fredagen den 31 januari 1992 klockan 10.00. Abstract The thesis raises questions concerning prehistoric conditions in a high mountain region in central Scandinavia; it focuses on the human use of stone and on hunting principally of reindeer. An analysis of how the stone material was utilized and an approach to how large mammals were hunt­ ed result in a synthesis describing one interpretation of how the vast landscape of a region in the central Scandinavian high mountains was used. With this major aim as a base questions were posed concerning the human use of stone resources and possible changes in this use. Preconditions for the occurrence of large mammals as game animals and for hunting are also highlighted. A general perspective is the long time period over which possible changes in the use of stone and hunting of big game, encompassing the Late Mesolithic, Neolithic, Bronze Age and to a certain extent the Early Iron Age. Considering the manufacture of flaked stone tools, debitage in the form of flakes from a dwelling, constitute the base where procurement and technology are essential.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Neolithic and chalcolithic cultures in Turkish Thrace Erdogu, Burcin How to cite: Erdogu, Burcin (2001) Neolithic and chalcolithic cultures in Turkish Thrace, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/3994/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk NEOLITHIC AND CHALCOLITHIC CULTURES IN TURKISH THRACE Burcin Erdogu Thesis Submitted for Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. University of Durham Department of Archaeology 2001 Burcin Erdogu PhD Thesis NeoHthic and ChalcoHthic Cultures in Turkish Thrace ABSTRACT The subject of this thesis are the NeoHthic and ChalcoHthic cultures in Turkish Thrace. Turkish Thrace acts as a land bridge between the Balkans and Anatolia.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Ancient Plant Use and the Importance of Geophytes Among the Island Chumash of Santa Cruz
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Ancient Plant Use and the Importance of Geophytes among the Island Chumash of Santa Cruz Island, California A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology by Kristina Marie Gill Committee in charge: Professor Michael A. Glassow, Chair Professor Michael A. Jochim Professor Amber M. VanDerwarker Professor Lynn H. Gamble September 2015 The dissertation of Kristina Marie Gill is approved. __________________________________________ Michael A. Jochim __________________________________________ Amber M. VanDerwarker __________________________________________ Lynn H. Gamble __________________________________________ Michael A. Glassow, Committee Chair July 2015 Ancient Plant Use and the Importance of Geophytes among the Island Chumash of Santa Cruz Island, California Copyright © 2015 By Kristina Marie Gill iii DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my Family, Mike Glassow, and the Chumash People. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to many people who have provided guidance, encouragement, and support in my career as an archaeologist, and especially through my undergraduate and graduate studies. For those of whom I am unable to personally thank here, know that I deeply appreciate your support. First and foremost, I want to thank my chair Michael Glassow for his patience, enthusiasm, and encouragement during all aspects of this daunting project. I am also truly grateful to have had the opportunity to know, learn from, and work with my other committee members, Mike Jochim, Amber VanDerwarker, and Lynn Gamble. I cherish my various field experiences with them all on the Channel Islands and especially in southern Germany with Mike Jochim, whose worldly perspective I value deeply. I also thank Terry Jones, who provided me many undergraduate opportunities in California archaeology and encouraged me to attend a field school on San Clemente Island with Mark Raab and Andy Yatsko, an experience that left me captivated with the islands and their history.
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistoric Lithic Technology} Workshops} and Chipping Stations in the Philippines
    Prehistoric Lithic Technology} Workshops} and Chipping Stations in the Philippines D. KYLE LATINIS THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS represent an important area for research of problems concerning prehistoric archaeology in Southeast Asia. These insular areas, located east of the biogeographic boundary known as Huxley's line, include a variety of tropical environments. These islands remained detached from the continental portion of Southeast Asia throughout the Pleistocene and Holocene. Archaeolog­ ical research has documented human occupation and adaptation from at least the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene within these islands. Unfortunately, relatively little intensive prehistoric archaeological research has been undertaken in the Philippines compared to some areas in mainland South­ east Asia, Oceania, and Australia. Warren Peterson's dissertation (1974) focused on a series of sites in northern Luzon and represents one of the foundation stud­ ies in the Philippines for modern archaeology. Peterson's work has often been cited and his conclusions used for the development of models concerning prehis­ tory in the Philippines and Southeast Asia. Peterson's research was conducted during a period when behavioral reconstruc­ tions from site assemblage analyses were prominent in archaeological research. Specifically, Peterson attempted behavioral reconstruction from the analysis of stone tools from the Busibus/Pintu site in northern Luzon, Philippines. A reanal­ ysis of the entire Busibus/Pintu lithic assemblage has revealed problems with Peterson's initial analysis and interpretation of this site-problems that will be addressed in this paper. Lithic technology, stone tool manufacture, and selection and reduction strategies will also be explored. Finally, new interpretations of the nature of the lithic assemblage and site activities at Busibus/Pintu rock shelter will be provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Evolution Next Factor in Drake Equation: F
    Cultural Evolution Next Factor in Drake Equation: fc • fc: fraction of planets with intelligent life that develop a technological phase, during which there is a capability for and interest in interstellar communication • No significant biological evolution in last 40,000 to 100,000 years • Evolutionary Takeover – Cultural evolution instead of biological – Much shorter timescale 1 Concepts 1. Timescales 2. Origin of agriculture 3. Extra-somatic information storage 4. Tools, technology 5. Interactions: written language, cities, taxes, classes, technology 6. Interest in communication 7. World view evolution 8. Coupling between technology and world view Importance of farming • The rise of civilizations all based on farming • Understand origins of agriculture • How likely to arise? • Did it arise independently more than once? 2 Origin of Agriculture 10,000 years ago within 50-100 miles of Dead Sea Natufian culture - well built houses & signs of rank Harvested wild wheat, barley - used flint sickles, Stone mortars, and hunted Climate becomes hotter, drier Overcrowding, shortages led to need for food source favors annuals over perennials shorter cycle larger seeds in husks - easier to collect Save, plant, harvest Evidence: seeds in settlements of Natufians successors Mutant: fatter, adheres to husk better fi domestication, selection without forethought leads to rapid evolution of wheat and hunting decreases rapidly Domestication (and farmers?) spread northward at ~ 1 km/year Hole & McCorriston American Anthropology ~ April 1991 3 Agriculture leads to higher level political organization 4 Information Genes 1010 bits (or less) Brains 1014 bits 1400 cm3 in humans fl Extra-somatic information leads to communication: information passed between individuals. Allows societies to evolve.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology Activity Pack
    Archaeology activity pack Primary KS2 Stone Age to Iron Age 1 All images and content © Museum of London 2015. This sheet is designed to be edited by teachers. The museum cannot take responsibility for edited content. How does archaeology help us understand what life was like in prehistory? This series of activities looks at how archaeologists record and interpret objects to inform our understanding about life in the past. Pupils will: use clues to sort artefacts into categories consider how and why an archaeologist records accurately where things are found use images of artefacts to think about how groups of objects can give us information about the past suggest reasons why some of our activities leave traces when others do not consolidate prior learning about Stone Age hunter-gatherers understand that there were people living here before London existed. Activity 1 Sort it! Identifying different flint tools Activity 2 The archaeological jigsaw What can we learn from a group of objects? Activity 3 Case study: Three Ways Wharf Hunter-gatherers in Uxbridge Activity 4 Leaving traces Make a Stone Age tool Activity 5 Dig it! Archaeological dig record and field journal worksheets 2 All images and content © Museum of London 2015. This sheet is designed to be edited by teachers. The museum cannot take responsibility for edited content. Activity 1 Sort it! Identifying different flint tools Introduction Begin by showing your pupils a selection of brushes; a toothbrush, a dustpan and brush, a hairbrush, a paintbrush and a floor brush. Ask pupils: What do all these objects have in common? What is each one is used for? Although all the objects are brushes, they are all used to perform different tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Chesrow Complex (Older Than Clovis?) in Southeast Wisconsin Matthew Allen Neff Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2015 An assessment of the Chesrow complex (older than Clovis?) in southeast Wisconsin Matthew Allen Neff Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Neff, Matthew Allen, "An assessment of the Chesrow complex (older than Clovis?) in southeast Wisconsin" (2015). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 14534. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/14534 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An Assessment of the Chesrow Complex (Older Than Clovis?) in Southeast Wisconsin by Matthew Allen Neff A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Major: Anthropology Program of Study Committee: Matthew G. Hill Grant Arndt Alan D. Wanamaker, Jr. Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2015 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................ iii LIST OF FIGURES ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Editor Associate Editors
    VOLUME 29 / NUMBER 1 / 1987 Published by THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE Editor MINZE STUIVER Associate Editors To serve until January 1, 1989 STEPHEN C PORTER Seattle, Washington To serve until January 1, 1988 W G MOOK Groningen, The Netherlands HANS OESCHGER Bern, Switzerland To serve until January 1, 1990 ANDREW MOORE New Haven, Connecticut To serve until January 1, 1992 CALVIN J HEUSSER Tuxedo, New York Managing Editor RENEE S KRA Kline Geology Laboratory Yale University New Haven, Connecticut 06511 ISSN: 0033-8222 NOTICE TO READERS AND CONTRIBUTORS Since its inception, the basic purpose of RADIOCARBON has been the publication of compilations of 14C dates produced by various laboratories. These lists are extremely useful for the dissemination of basic 14C information. In recent years, RADIOCARBON has also been publishing technical and interpretative articles on all aspects of 14C. We would like to encourage this type of publication on a regular basis. In addition, we will be publishing compilations of published and unpublished dates along with interpretative text for these dates on a regional basis. Authors who would like to compose such an article for his/her area of interest should contact the Managing Editor for infor- mation. Another section is added to our regular issues, "Notes and Comments." Authors are invited to extend discussions or raise pertinent questions to the results of scientific inves- tigations that have appeared on our pages. The section includes short, technical notes to relay information concerning innovative sample preparation procedures. Laboratories may also seek assistance in technical aspects of radiocarbon dating. Book reviews will also be included for special editions.
    [Show full text]
  • Climatic Variability at Modoc Rock Shelter (Illinois) and Watson Brake (Louisiana): Biometric and Isotopic Evidence from Archaeological Freshwater Mussel Shell
    Mississippi State University Scholars Junction Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1-1-2009 Climatic variability at Modoc Rock Shelter (Illinois) and Watson Brake (Louisiana): biometric and isotopic evidence from archaeological freshwater mussel shell Sarah Mistak Caughron Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td Recommended Citation Caughron, Sarah Mistak, "Climatic variability at Modoc Rock Shelter (Illinois) and Watson Brake (Louisiana): biometric and isotopic evidence from archaeological freshwater mussel shell" (2009). Theses and Dissertations. 1070. https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td/1070 This Graduate Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Scholars Junction. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Junction. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CLIMATIC VARIABILITY AT MODOC ROCK SHELTER (ILLINOIS) AND WATSON BRAKE (LOUISIANA): BIOMETRIC AND ISOTOPIC EVIDENCE FROM ARCHAEOLOGICAL FRESHWATER MUSSEL SHELL By Sarah Mistak Caughron A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Mississippi State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Applied Anthropology in the Department of Anthropology and Middle Eastern Cultures Mississippi State, Mississippi December 2009 Copyright 2009 By Sarah Mistak Caughron CLIMATIC VARIABILITY AT MODOC ROCK SHELTER (ILLINOIS) AND WATSON BRAKE (LOUISIANA): BIOMETRIC
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistoric ·Art of the Central Coast of British Columbia ROY L
    CHAPTER 7 Prehistoric ·Art of the Central Coast of British Columbia ROY L. CARLSON glance at any Northwest Coast art book attests firmly to the existence of a highly developed tradi­ A tion of painting and carving wood during the nineteenth century by the ancestors of the Bella Bella and Bella Coola peoples of the central coast of British Columbia. Similarly, examination of the journals of Sir Alexander Mackenzie and George Vancouver carries this tradition backward into the last decades of the eighteenth century. The reading of Mcllwraith's, The Bella Coo/a Indians (1948), or Boas', Mythology of the Bella Coo/a (1900b) and Bella Bella Tales (1932), provides some insights into the meaning of this art in the cultures which produced it. But what of the decades, centuries and millenia which preceded both the early explorers and the later ethnographers? What art was produced Fig. 7:1. Whalebone pendant resembling a rockfish from then? What techniques were employed and what styles the site of Namu dating to about 3,500 years ago. were produced? What was the meaning of this art and what were its historical relationships? This paper is directed toward answering these questions, even though in wood. At the bottom-the beginning of time for this in spite of the considerable archaeological research over part of the world-archaeological evidence comes from the last fourteen years, the data base is still very much a single component at the site of Namu (ElSx 1). The limited. assemblage from the basal levels of this site is a chipped stone industry with relationships to both the Pebble Tool Tradition and the Microblade Tradition (Ch.
    [Show full text]