Icfr Central Interest Group Icfr Central Interest Group Field Day Field

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Icfr Central Interest Group Icfr Central Interest Group Field Day Field ICFR CENTRAL INTEREST GROUP FIELD DAY Date: Tuesday 20 th March 2007 Venue: CTC’s Longridge Plantation, Paulpietersburg Time: 08h30 for 09h00 PROGRAMME 08h30 Meet for at Estate Office for tea and coffee Indoor Presentations 09h00 Welcome to the field day Siggie von Fintel TWK 09h10 Introduction to CTC’s Longridge Plantation Edwin Schramm CTC The Pine Fusarium Working Group of SA: “The road 09h30 Paul Viero ICFR ahead” One year survival results from Pinus patula survival 09h45 Jacob Crous Sappi monitoring plots in Mpumalanga Post-establishment weed control in pine and 10h00 Keith Little ICFR eucalypt stands Cooldrinks 10h30 Travel to 1 st field stop InInIn-In ---fieldfield PPPresentationsPresentations 11h00 Visit to CTC’s E. smithii site Richard Liversage CTC 11h30 Travel to second field stop Sirex in South Africa – The status of the threat and Colin Dyer & 11h45 ICFR its control Philip Croft Investigating the environmental adaptation of promising sub-tropical and cold-tolerant eucalypt 12h15 Robin Gardner ICFR species in the warm temperate climate zone of KwaZulu-Natal: four year results of trials. Update on the growth potential of non-commercial 12h45 eucalypt species in the summer rainfall regions of Chris Komakech MondiBP South Africa (E. bicostata and E. nobilis) 13h15 Return to Estate Office for Lunch sponsored by CTC, NCT & TWK Directions to CTC Longridge: 1.1.1. Travelling from Vryheid to Paulpietersburg, approx 36km from Vryheid turn left at the CTC Longridge signboard, onto a dirt road (will be signposposted).ted). 2.2.2. Travel approx 5km following the main road to the Estate Office (signposted). The next ICFR Regional Interest Group Field Day will be held at Kwambonambi, Zululand on 333rdrdrd MayMay.... For more information contact Denis Oscroft ( ([email protected]@[email protected])))) ICFR Central Region Field Day © ICFR 2007 Page 1 AnAnAn introduction to CTC’s Longridge Plantation Edwin Schramm ([email protected]) Central Timber Co-operative (Ltd), P O Box 495 Pietermaritzburg, 3200 Longridge Estate In 1995, CTC, together with Sumitomo Corporation and Nippon Paper commissioned a study to identify 10000 ha of suitable land for plantation investment in the Vryheid and Paulpietersburg area. From this study, a joint plantation scheme called Forest Resources (Pty) Ltd was established in 1996, with CTC maintaining a major shareholding in the scheme. Through this venture Longridge Estate, comprising 3668 ha of land, was purchased in 1996. It has 1700 ha of multiple gum species, 465 ha of pine and 390 ha of wattle. On average it harvests 3 500 tons of wattle and 25 000 tons of gum per annum. At its peak the Estate sold 55 000 tons of gum in 2003. Since inception it has sold 250 000 tons of hardwood to CTC Richards Bay. Longridge is both ISO 14001 and FSC certified and is managed according sound forestry standards and principles. It has to contend with a wide range of growing conditions and therefore ensures sound implementation of site specific silvicultural operations. 1 2 3 Longridge turnoff 1. Field stop 1 ( E. smithii ) 2. Field stop 2 (Sirex update ( P. elliottii stand) 3. Field stop 3 Eucalypt alternate and cold tolerant species update ( E. badjensis stand) © ICFR 2007 Page 3 ICFR Central Regional Field Day The Pine Fusarium Working Group of SA: “The road ahead” Paul Viero ([email protected]) Institute for Commercial Forestry Research, PO Box 100281, Scottsville 3209 Introduction It is now globally acknowledged that the Pitch Canker Fungus ( Fusarium circinatum ) can be regarded as one of the most serious threats to the softwood forestry industry. It is believed the fungus originated in Mexico from where it spread to the South-East USA (1946), Western USA (1985), Japan (1989), and South Africa (1990) before being recently identified in Chile (2001). In the USA, the pathogen has reached epidemic proportions, severely affecting mature stands. Symptoms of the disease in the nursery first appear approximately four months from the date of sowing and death usually occurs within a month. The growing tip of the seedling begins to droop and discolouration (purpling) of the stem and needles follow. In South Africa, root die-back will occur during the early stages of infection but may not be noticed until plants are removed from the trays. The pine species most susceptible to this pathogen in South Africa are Pinus radiata and Pinus patula with Pinus elliottii and Pinus tecunumanii showing higher signs of tolerance. Fusarium circinatum can be water borne, air borne, soil borne and seed borne. Its introduction into South Africa was originally through infected seed, however its subsequent mode of distribution within the country has probably been air borne (spores) through the movement of infected plants and trays between nurseries and into the field. In the USA, the pathogen is spread predominantly by insect vectors in mature stands, whilst in South Africa insect vectors have not been conclusively linked to its spread. Until now, Fusarium circinatum has remained a nursery pathogen in South Africa, attacking primarily P. patula and P. radiata seedlings and cuttings with a seemingly increase in field mortality soon after out- planting (observed by many South African forestry companies). This has undoubtedly raised concern within the forestry industry fearing that this disease will at some stage progress into mature stands if action is not taken to curb its spread. As a result the Pine Fusarium Working Group (PFWG) was initiated in 2000 by a group of concerned nurserymen and researchers from the various sectors within the forestry industry, with the aims of: 1. Ensuring the long-term availability of Pinus patula as a preferred species for future afforestation; 2. Developing practical protocols/guidelines and methods to assist nurserymen and foresters in the raising (nursery) and re-establishment (field) of Pinus patula; 3. Sharing information and experience on the management of Fusarium circinatum with all Pine growers in South Africa; and 4. Pooling current knowledge and experience through open communication and trust between members. In the short-term, good, strict nursery hygiene combined with the responsible use of environmentally acceptable fungicides is the approach advocated by the PFWG to South African nurserymen. Good nursery hygiene efforts include: 1. Using sterilised plastic trays and whenever possible only using new polystyrene trays for P. patula ; 2. Removing accumulated bark media from beneath the beds that could harbour spores; 3. Routinely administering a sterilant to the areas beneath the beds, to pathways and vehicles moving through the nursery; 4. Spraying a number of environmentally safe fungicides, on a rotational basis, to ensure that resistance by the pathogen does not develop to any one fungicide; and 5. Removing all dying material on a regular (daily/weekly) basis, carrying it away from the nursery and burning it. It was through these initiatives (and others) that the PFWG in conjunction with the Seedling Growers Association of SA compiled and successfully initiated Section 19 of the Nursery Certification programme. This is a programme whereby nurseries producing pine seedlings are audited on an annual basis and are ICFR Central Region Field Day © ICFR 2007 Page 4 certified as to complying with a minimum set of standards for the management of Fusarium circinatum within the nursery environment. The PFWG has been (and currently is) involved in many other initiatives in order to reduce the incidence of spread of this disease, with some of the currently more noteworthy being: • Determining effective, environmentally safe chemicals to control future outbreaks (including the process of registering fungicide/s for use against Fusarium circinatum ); • Drawing up a Monitoring Protocol for the gathering of data relevant to the intensity and spread of Fusarium circinatum in South Africa; and • The implementation of these monitoring plots (currently in progress). This pathogen spreads unseen to the eye (unlike Sirex ), and is difficult and complicated to understand making it very difficult to control. It is important to understand that Fusarium circinatum is here to stay and if left unchecked could result in far greater devastation to the softwood industry than Sirex . Early indications suggest that Fusarium circinatum will move from being a primarily “nursery type” of pathogen to one of the field (full blown PCF in mature trees). The PFWG has realised the serious predicament potentially facing the forestry industry and decided (in principle) to re-evaluate their mission and aim with the intention of aligning itself closer to the important issues surrounding the eventual emergence of full blown PCF without necessarily compromising on current short term aims and objectives. Take home points Fusarium circinatum in its full blown form (Pitch Canker Fungus) in mature pine trees may be regarded as one of the most serious threats to the softwood forestry industry in SA and world wide. The PFWG in SA comprises of (and was initiated by) a group of concerned nurserymen and researchers from various sectors within the forestry industry. The primary aim/role of the PFWG is to implement effective short term strategies to confine the pathogen (as far as possible) to the nursery through strict hygiene protocols. In this regard the PFWG in association with the SGASA have successfully implemented Section 19 within the Nation Certification Programme to manage Fusarium circinatum . A further need to gather information regarding the intensity and spread of Fusarium circinatum in SA is of primary importance (Concept of Monitoring Plots and timeous implementation thereof). Understanding the potential threat of PCF to the pine industry has resulted in the PFWG re- assessing its current role within the forestry industry. ICFR Central Region Field Day © ICFR 2007 Page 5 One year survival results from Pinus patula survival monitoring plots in Mpumalanga Jacob Crous ([email protected]) Sappi Forests Research, P.O.
Recommended publications
  • Zululand District Municipality Idp Review
    ZULULAND DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY IDP REVIEW Integrated Development Plan Review 2018/2019 Zululand District Municipality Private Bag X76 Ulundi 3838. Tel: +27 (0) 35 874 5500, Fax: +27 (0) 35 874 5591/874 5589, E-Mail: [email protected] Zululand District Municipality IDP Review, 2018 Contact Details: ZULULAND DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY Mayor: Mr. Thulasizwe Buthelezi Municipal Manager: Mr. PM Manqele P/Bag X 76 ULUNDI 3838 Tel: 035 8745500 Fax: 035 8745589 E-Mail: [email protected] 1 Zululand District Municipality IDP Review, 2018 Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS DOCUMENT ........................................................................................................................... 9 CHAPTER 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 10 1.1 WHO ARE WE? .................................................................................................................................................. 10 1.2 HOW WAS THIS PLAN (IDP) DEVELOPED ......................................................................................................... 40 1.3 KEY CHALLENGES .............................................................................................................................................. 18 1.4 MUNICIPAL VISION ........................................................................................................................................... 23 1.5 ZULULAND STRATEGIC PLAN ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Zululand District Municipality Integrated
    ZULULAND DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 2020/2021 REVIEW Integrated Development Planning is an approach to planning that involves the entire municipality and its citizens in finding the best solutions to achieve good long- term development. OFFICE OF THE MUNICIPAL MANAGER [Email address] TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Introduction to the Zululand District Municipality ................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Objectives of the ZDM IDP...................................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Scope of the Zululand District Municipality IDP ..................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Approach ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 1.6 Public Participation ................................................................................................................................................. 6 2 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT LEGISLATION AND POLICY .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annexure a of Na-Ques 1379 Kwazulu-Natal
    ANNEXURE A OF NA-QUES 1379 KWAZULU-NATAL Province Private etc) in Hectares) Production Type 1 Type Production Local Local Municipality Land Transfer date Transfer Land Farm/ Farm/ name Project Price Purchase Land District Municipality Property Description Property Integrated Value Chain Forestry: Category B&CCategory Forestry: refurbishment and forest forest and refurbishment (SLAG, LRAD, LASS, SPLAG, Funding Model/Grant Type Funding Comodity Comodity (APAP: Red Meat aquaculture and small-scale and aquaculture Integrated Value , Chain Fruit Commonage, PLAS, Donation, PLAS,Commonage, Donation, protection strategy, Fisheries: protection and Vegetables, Wine, and Wheat, fisheries schemes and fisheriesBiofuels) schemes and Integrated Value Poultry Chain, Total Hectares Acquired (ExtentTotal Hectares Acquired The Farm Nooitgedacht No. 356, Remainder of Portion 1 of the Farm Brak Fontein No. 374, Portion 7 (of 4) of the Farm Umveloosidrift No. 17054, Remainder of the Farm Ongegunde Braksloot No. 432, Portion 3 (of 1) of the Farm Scheeperslaagte No. 244, Remainder of Portion 2 of the Farm Scheeperslaagte No. 244, Remainder of Portion 1 of the Farm KZN Zululand Abaqulusi Scheeperslaagte 4679,7303 Wheat Grazing PLAS 31 July 2014 R26 060 000 Scheeperslaagte No. 244, Portion 4 (of 2) of The Farm Kromellengboog No. 298, Remainder of Portion 6 of the Farm Brak Fontein No. 374, Portion 2 of the Farm Brak Fontein No. 374, Portion 3 of the Farm Brak Fontein No. 374, Portion 5 (of 1) of the Farm Brak Fontein No. 374, Portion 7 (of 6) of the Farm Brak Fontein No. 374 Pentecostal Holiness KZN Uthungulu Ntambanana Portion 8 (of 4) of the Farm Wallenton No.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2015/2016
    SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE: VOTE 23 ANNUAL REPORT 2015/2016 ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16 SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE VOTE 23 2015/16 ANNUAL REPORT REPORT ANNUAL www.saps.gov.za BACK TO BASICS TOWARDS A SAFER TOMORROW #CrimeMustFall A SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE: VOTE 23 ANNUAL REPORT 2015/2016 B SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE: VOTE 23 ANNUAL REPORT 2015/2016 Compiled by: SAPS Strategic Management Layout and Design: SAPS Corporate Communication Corporate Identity and Design Photographs: SAPS Corporate Communication Language Editing: SAPS Corporate Communication Further information on the Annual Report for the South African Police Service for 2015/2016 may be obtained from: SAPS Strategic Management (Head Office) Telephone: 012 393 3082 RP Number: RP188/2016 ISBN Number: 978-0-621-44668-5 i SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE: VOTE 23 ANNUAL REPORT 2015/2016 SUBMISSION OF THE ANNUAL REPORT TO THE MINISTER OF POLICE Mr NPT Nhleko MINISTER OF POLICE I have the honour of submitting the Annual Report of the Department of Police for the period 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2016. LIEUTENANT GENERAL JK PHAHLANE Date: 31 August 2016 ii SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE: VOTE 23 ANNUAL REPORT 2015/2016 CONTENTS PART A: GENERAL INFORMATION 1. GENERAL INFORMATION OF THE DEPARTMENT 1 2. LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS/ACRONYMS 2 3. FOREWORD BY THE MINISTER 7 4. DEPUTY MINISTER’S STATEMENT 10 5. REPORT OF THE ACCOUNTING OFFICER 13 6. STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY AND CONFIRMATION OF ACCURACY FOR THE ANNUAL REPORT 24 7. STRATEGIC OVERVIEW 25 7.1 VISION 25 7.2 MISSION 25 7.3 VALUES 25 7.4 CODE OF CONDUCT 25 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Sector Plan for the Zululand District Municipality, Kwazulu-Natal
    EZEMVELO KZN WILDLIFE Biodiversity Sector Plan for the Zululand District Municipality, KwaZulu-Natal Technical Report February 2010 The Project Team Thorn-Ex cc (Environmental Services) PO Box 800, Hilton, 3245 Pietermaritzbur South Africa Tel: (033) 3431814 Fax: (033) 3431819 Mobile: 084 5014665 [email protected] Marita Thornhill (Project Management & Coordination) AFZELIA Environmental Consultants cc KwaZulu-Natal Western Cape PO Box 95 PO Box 3397 Hilton 3245 Cape Town 8000 Tel: 033 3432931/32 Tel: 072 3900686 Fax: 033 3432033 or Fax: 086 5132112 086 5170900 Mobile: 084 6756052 [email protected] [email protected] Wolfgang Kanz (Biodiversity Specialist Coordinator) John Richardson (GIS) Monde Nembula (Social Facilitation) Tim O’Connor & Associates P.O.Box 379 Hilton 3245 South Africa Tel/ Fax: 27-(0)33-3433491 [email protected] Tim O’Connor (Biodiversity Expert Advice) Zululand Biodiversity Sector Plan (February 2010) 1 Executive Summary The Biodiversity Act introduced several legislated planning tools to assist with the management and conservation of South Africa’s biological diversity. These include the declaration of “Bioregions” and the publication of “Bioregional Plans”. Bioregional plans are usually an output of a systematic spatial conservation assessment of a region. They identify areas of conservation priority, and constraints and opportunities for implementation of the plan. The precursor to a Bioregional Plan is a Biodiversity Sector Plan (BSP), which is the official reference for biodiversity priorities to be taken into account in land-use planning and decision-making by all sectors within the District Municipality. The overall aim is to avoid the loss of natural habitat in Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) and prevent the degradation of Ecological Support Areas (ESAs), while encouraging sustainable development in Other Natural Areas.
    [Show full text]
  • KZN Zusub 02022018 Uphong
    !C !C^ ñ!.!C !C $ !C^ ^ ^ !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C ^ !C !C^ !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C ñ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C ^ !C !C $ !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^!C ^ !C !C ñ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C ^ ^ !C ñ !C !C !C !C !C ^$ !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C ñ !C !C !C !C ^ !C !.ñ !C ñ !C !C ^ !C ^ !C ^ !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ñ ^ !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C ñ !C !C ñ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ñ !C !C ^ ^ !C !C !. !C !C ñ ^!C ^ !C !C !C ñ ^ !C !C ^ $ ^$!C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C !.^ ñ $ !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C $ !C ^ !C $ !C !C !C ñ $ !C !. !C !C !C !C !C ñ!C!. ^ ^ ^ !C $!. !C^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C !C !C !C ^ !.!C !C !C !C ñ !C !C ^ñ !C !C !C ñ !.^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !Cñ ^$ ^ !C ñ !C ñ!C!.^ !C !. !C !C ^ ^ ñ !. !C !C $^ ^ñ ^ !C ^ ñ ^ ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C ^ !C $ !. ñ!C !C !C ^ !C ñ!.^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C $!C ^!. !. !. !C ^ !C !C !. !C ^ !C !C ^ !C ñ!C !C !. !C $^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !.
    [Show full text]
  • KZN Amsub Sept2017 Emadla
    !C ^ ñ!.C! !C $ ^!C ^ ^ !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C ^ !C^ !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C ñ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C ^ !C !C $ !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ ^ !C ñ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C ^ ^ !C ñ !C !C !C !C !C ^$ !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C ñ !C !C !C ^ ñ!.!C !C ñ!C !C !C ^ !C !C ^ ^ !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C ñ !C !C ^ !C ñ !C !C !C ñ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ñ !C !C ^ ^ !C !C !. !C !C ñ ^!C !C ^ !C !C ñ ^ !C !C ^ $ ^$!C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C ^ ñ!. $ !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C $ ^ !C $ !C !C !C ñ $ !C !. !C !C !C !C !C ñ!C!. ^ ^ ^ !C $!. !C^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C!C !. !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !.ñ!C !C !C !C ^ñ !C !C ñ !C ^ !C !C !C!. !C !C !C !C !C ^ ^ !C !Cñ ^$ ñ !C ñ!C!.^ !C !. !C !C ^ ^ ñ !. !C $^ ^ñ!C ^ !C ^ ñ ^ ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C ^ !C $ !. ñ!C !C !C ^ ñ!C.^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C $!C ^!. !. !. !C ^ !C !C!. ^ !C !C^ !C !C !C !C ñ !C !. $^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened Ecosystems in South Africa: Descriptions and Maps
    Threatened Ecosystems in South Africa: Descriptions and Maps DRAFT May 2009 South African National Biodiversity Institute Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism Contents List of tables .............................................................................................................................. vii List of figures............................................................................................................................. vii 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 8 2 Criteria for identifying threatened ecosystems............................................................... 10 3 Summary of listed ecosystems ........................................................................................ 12 4 Descriptions and individual maps of threatened ecosystems ...................................... 14 4.1 Explanation of descriptions ........................................................................................................ 14 4.2 Listed threatened ecosystems ................................................................................................... 16 4.2.1 Critically Endangered (CR) ................................................................................................................ 16 1. Atlantis Sand Fynbos (FFd 4) .......................................................................................................................... 16 2. Blesbokspruit Highveld Grassland
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: the Business Sector
    ZULULAND LED FRAMEWORK FINAL DRAFT PHASE 3: BUSINESS SECTOR REPORT CHAPTER 4: THE BUSINESS SECTOR 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE OF REPORT Chapter 4 of the Status Quo Report forms part of the Phase 3 product of the Zululand Coordinated Local Economic Development Framework project focussing specifically on the Business Sector. Whereas Chapter 1 of the report provides a general introduction to local economic development and the context for local economic, Chapters 3 to 4 of the document presents a status quo analysis of what has been identified as the key economic sectors in the Zululand District Municipality, the sectors being respectively the Tourism Sector (Chapter 2), the Agricultural Sector (Chapter 3) and the Business Sector (Chapter 4). Although the Status Quo Report is structured on a sectoral basis it is widely acknowledged that close linkages exists between the various sectors and economic development activities within each of the broad sectors. These linkages will be addressed in more detail in Phase 4 of the project, the strategy development phase. The Business Sector Status Quo Report is aimed at providing: an overview of current activities within the business sector and highlighting key issues impacting on the development of the sector; an evaluation of the potential for the future development of the sector; and an identification of key opportunities relating to the sector. 1.2 DEFINING THE SECTOR The Business Sector, as defined for the purpose of this project, does not relate to any established industrial sector classification system. The Business Sector does, however, include a number of generally recognised industry sectors including commerce, manufacturing, construction, transport and mining.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Assessment for the Proposed Babanango Travelers Camp, Adjacent to the White Mfolozi River, Ulundi Local Municipality, Zululand District, Kwazulu-Natal
    Basic Assessment for the Proposed Babanango Travelers Camp, Adjacent to the White Mfolozi River, Ulundi Local Municipality, Zululand District, KwaZulu-Natal Consultation (Draft) Basic Assessment Report for Comment July 2020 Prepare for: Emcakwini Community Trust 19 Wilson Street, Babanango, 3850 Northern KwaZulu-Natal Prepared by: Integrated Development Management Services Environmental (IDME) Consultants Ocean Dune, FMI House, 2 Heleza Boulevard Hillhead Umhlanga, 4320 i Client: Emcakwini Community Trust (ECT) Reference Document as: Basic Assessment for the Proposed Babanango Travelers Camp, Babanango Game Reserve, KwaZulu- Natal, Draft I for Comment, IDME, 2020 Client Reference Number: Babanango Travelers Camp Competent Authority Reference: To be issued Report Compiled by: Novashni Sharleen Moodley Pr.Sci.Nat Date of Report: July 2020 Report reviewed and approved by: Karl Wiggishoff Applicant: Emcakwini Community Trust Competent Authority: The Department of Economic Development, Tourism and Environmental Affairs (EDTEA) Environmental Assessment Practitioner (EAP): Novashni Sharleen Moodley of IDM Environmental Ocean Dune, FMI House, 2 Heleza Boulevard Hillhead Umhlanga, Sibaya Precinct, 4320 [email protected] i NOTICE This document and its appendices are a public document and made available to the Competent Authority (CA), commenting authorities, stakeholders, Interested and Affected Parties (I&APs), and the general public. This Consultation Basic Assessment Report (cBAR) is available for comment for a period of 30 days from 30 July to 30 August 2020. This report will then be amended and updated in response to the comments received during this review period. Once finalised the BAR will be submitted to the KwaZulu-Natal Department of Economic Development, Tourism and Environmental Affairs, Zululand District (KZN EDTEA), for decision-making.
    [Show full text]
  • Revision of the Genus Sphenostylis (Fabaceae: Phaseoleae) in South Africa and Swaziland
    Bothalia 42,1: 1–6 (2012) Revision of the genus Sphenostylis (Fabaceae: Phaseoleae) in South Africa and Swaziland A.N. MOTEETEE*† and B.-E. VAN WYK* Keywords: Fabaceae, Leguminosae, Nesphostylis Verdc., Phaseoleae, Phaseolinae, southern Africa, Sphenostylis E.Mey., Vigna Savi ABSTRACT A taxonomic revision of the genus Sphenostylis E.Mey. (tribe Phaseoleae) in southern Africa is presented. The genus is distinguishable by its characteristic wedge-shaped, dorsiventrally flattened style tip. Of the seven known species in the genus, only two, S. angustifolia and S. marginata, occur in South Africa and Swaziland; and the former is endemic to these countries. The two species differ in the size, shape, and venation of the leaflets; as well as the length of the petiole, peduncle, and pod. A key to the two species is provided and the correct nomenclature, typification, and known geographical distributions are given. INTRODUCTION as closely related as previously thought, and that Sphe- nostylis is rather closer to Dolichos and Macrotyloma Sphenostylis E.Mey. belongs to the subtribe Phaseo- (Wight & Arn.) Verdc. (Wojciechowski et al. 2004). linae of tribe Phaseoleae (Fabaceae). It is named for Sphenostylis can be distinguished from Dolichos, Ma- the wedge-shaped, dorsiventrally flattened style (from crotyloma, and Vigna by the absence of appendages on the Greek word spheno = wedge). It is a small genus the standard petals (appendages present on the standard comprising seven species, all occurring in the tro- petals in the latter three genera). pics and southern parts of the African continent (Gillett et al. 1971; Potter 1992; Potter & Doyle 1994; Schrire Sphenostylis is represented in South Africa and Swa- 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Export This Category As A
    South African Government Provincial and Local Government Directory: KwaZulu-Natal Municipalities 2021-09-27 Table of Contents AbaQulusi Local Municipality .............................................................................................................................. 3 Alfred Duma Local Municipality ........................................................................................................................... 3 Amajuba District Municipality .............................................................................................................................. 3 Big 5 Hlabisa Local Municipality (The) ................................................................................................................ 4 City of uMhlathuze Local Municipality ................................................................................................................ 4 Dannhauser Local Municipality ............................................................................................................................ 4 Dr Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma Local Municipality ................................................................................................ 5 eDumbe Local Municipality .................................................................................................................................. 5 Emadlangeni Local Municipality .......................................................................................................................... 6 Endumeni Local Municipality ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]