DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Morphological Species Verification And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Morphological Species Verification And MORPHOLOGICAL SPECIES VERIFICATION AND GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF Anolis (SAURIA: POLYCHROTIDAE) IN FLORIDA By BRIAN J. CAMPOSANO A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2011 1 © 2011 Brian J. Camposano 2 To all who dedicated time, effort, patience, and advice throughout my graduate career, in order to make this accomplishment a reality 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I thank the chair of my committee, Dr. Steve Johnson, for believing in me throughout this entire process and helping motivating me through some difficult times while conducting this study. I thank the co-chair of my committee and mentor, Dr. Kenneth Krysko, for the countless hours of scientific and editorial assistance provided throughout my time as a graduate student. I thank the other members of my committee, Drs. Todd Campbell and Jeffrey Hill, for their valuable insight, guidance, and editorial comments enabling me to finish my study. I thank Dr. Kent Vliet, for providing me with a job throughout a significant portion of my graduate career and helping to develop my teaching skills. I thank the University of Florida College of Agriculture and Life Sciences statistical department for advice and guidance on the methodologies and interpretations of my data. I also thank my parents, family and friends who encouraged and supported me throughout this entire process. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................................4 LIST OF TABLES ...........................................................................................................................7 LIST OF FIGURES .........................................................................................................................8 ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................10 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................12 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS ...........................................................................................21 Specimens ...............................................................................................................................21 Morphological Characters and Counts ...................................................................................21 Statistical Analyses .................................................................................................................24 3 RESULTS ...............................................................................................................................36 Meristic Data Comparisons ....................................................................................................36 Morphometric Data Comparisons ...........................................................................................40 Anolis carolinensis and Anolis porcatus.................................................................................42 A Key to the Anoles of Florida ...............................................................................................45 4 DISCUSSION .........................................................................................................................80 Informative Meristic Characters .............................................................................................81 Morphometric Characters .......................................................................................................83 Anolis carolinensis and Anolis porcatus.................................................................................86 Phenotypic Plasticity and Gene Flow .....................................................................................90 5 SPECIES ACCOUNTS ..........................................................................................................92 6 CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................................113 APPENDIX A Anolis SPECIMENS MORPHOLOGICALLY EXAMINED FOR KEY VERIFICATION ..................................................................................................................115 B Anolis SPECIMENS GEO-REFERENCED .........................................................................117 LIST OF REFERENCES .............................................................................................................123 5 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH .......................................................................................................131 6 LIST OF TABLES Table page 2-1 Collection locality of Anolis specimens .............................................................................29 2-2 Morphological characters for overall analysis ...................................................................30 2-3 Collection locality of additional Anolis specimens ............................................................31 2-4 Additional morphological characters used .........................................................................31 3-1 Interspecific variation of meristic characters .....................................................................47 3-2 Descriptive statistics for significant characters ..................................................................48 3-3 Significant characters in overall DFA................................................................................50 3-4 Mean response for morphometric features ........................................................................51 3-5 Axilla-groin distance and head length comparisons ..........................................................52 3-6 Head width and internarial distance comparisons .............................................................53 3-7 Ear-eye distance and naris-rostrum distance comparisons ................................................54 3-8 Snout length and tibia length comparisons ........................................................................55 3-9 Significant characters for female A. carolinensis and A. porcatus ....................................56 3-10 Significant characters for male A. carolinensis and A. porcatus .......................................56 3-11 Combinations of characters used for logistic regression ...................................................57 3-12 Model test results for female A. carolinensis and A. porcatus ..........................................58 3-13 Model test results for male A. carolinensis and A. porcatus .............................................58 3-14 Predictor coefficients for female A. carolinensis and A. porcatus ....................................58 3-15 Predictor coefficients for male A. carolinensis and A. porcatus........................................58 3-16 Model prediction values for unknown Anolis specimens ..................................................59 3-17 Significant characters for female A. carolinensis and A. porcatus DFA ...........................61 3-18 Significant characters for male A. carolinensis and A. porcatus DFA ..............................61 7 LIST OF FIGURES Figure page 2-1 Anolis sub-digital lamellae characteristics. ........................................................................32 2-2 Anolis side of head characteristics .....................................................................................33 2-3 Anolis top of head characteristics. .....................................................................................34 2-4 Anolis ventral scale characteristics. ...................................................................................35 3-1 Expanded sub-digital lamellae numbering 15 to 24. .........................................................62 3-2 Expanded sub-digital lamellae numbering 14 or less. .......................................................63 3-3 Separation of interparietal and supra-orbital scales by at least one scale. .........................64 3-4 Interparietal and supra-orbital scales in contact. ................................................................65 3-5 Longitudinal ventral scales numbering 52 to 70. ...............................................................66 3-6 Longitudinal ventral scales numbering 30 to 49. ...............................................................67 3-7 Supra-orbital scales separated by two or more scales. .......................................................68 3-8 Supra-orbital scales separated by zero or one scale. ..........................................................69 3-9 Small, round and keeled dorsal scales. ..............................................................................70 3-10 Large, flat and smooth dorsal scales. .................................................................................71 3-11 Uniform mid-dorsal scales. ................................................................................................72 3-12 Expanded mid-dorsal scales. ..............................................................................................73 3-13 Multicarinate supra-ocular scales. .....................................................................................74 3-14 Singly keeled supra-ocular scales. .....................................................................................75
Load more

Recommended publications
  • <I>ANOLIS</I> LIZARDS in the FOOD WEBS of STRUCTURALLY
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 12-2016 ASSESSING THE FUNCTIONAL SIMILARITY OF NATIVE AND INVASIVE ANOLIS LIZARDS IN THE FOOD WEBS OF STRUCTURALLY-SIMPLE HABITATS IN FLORIDA Nathan W. Turnbough University of Tennessee, Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Turnbough, Nathan W., "ASSESSING THE FUNCTIONAL SIMILARITY OF NATIVE AND INVASIVE ANOLIS LIZARDS IN THE FOOD WEBS OF STRUCTURALLY-SIMPLE HABITATS IN FLORIDA. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2016. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4174 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Nathan W. Turnbough entitled "ASSESSING THE FUNCTIONAL SIMILARITY OF NATIVE AND INVASIVE ANOLIS LIZARDS IN THE FOOD WEBS OF STRUCTURALLY-SIMPLE HABITATS IN FLORIDA." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing Sustainable Forestry Methods in Puerto Rico
    Herpetology Notes, volume 8: 141-148 (2015) (published online on 10 April 2015) Testing sustainable forestry methods in Puerto Rico: Does the presence of the introduced timber tree Blue Mahoe, Talipariti elatum, affect the abundance of Anolis gundlachi? Norman Greenhawk Abstract. The island of Puerto Rico has one of the highest rates of regrowth of secondary forests largely due to abandonment of previously agricultural land. The study was aimed at determining the impact of the presence of Talipariti elatum, a timber species planted for forest enrichment, on the abundance of anoles at Las Casas de la Selva, a sustainable forestry project located in Patillas, Puerto Rico. The trees planted around 25 years ago are fast-growing and now dominate canopies where they were planted. Two areas, a control area of second-growth forest without T. elatum and an area within the T. elatum plantation, were surveyed over an 18 month period. The null hypothesis that anole abundance within the study areas is independent of the presence of T. elatum could not be rejected. The findings of this study may have implications when designing forest management practices where maintaining biodiversity is a goal. Keywords. Anolis gundlachi, Anolis stratulus, Puerto Rican herpetofauna, introduced species, forestry Introduction The secondary growth forest represents a significant resource base for the people of Puerto Rico, and, if At the time of Spanish colonization in 1508, nearly managed properly, an increase in suitable habitat one hundred percent of Puerto Rico was covered in for forest-dwelling herpetofauna. Depending on the forest (Wadsworth, 1950). As a result of forest clearing management methods used, human-altered agro- for agricultural and pastureland, ship building, and fuel forestry plantations have potential conservation wood, approximately one percent of the land surface value (Wunderle, 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Chamaeleolis” Species Group from Eastern Cuba
    Acta Soc. Zool. Bohem. 76: 45–52, 2012 ISSN 1211-376X Anolis sierramaestrae sp. nov. (Squamata: Polychrotidae) of the “chamaeleolis” species group from Eastern Cuba Veronika Holáňová1,3), Ivan REHÁK2) & Daniel FRYNTA1) 1) Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Viničná 7, CZ–128 43 Praha 2, Czech Republic 2) Prague Zoo, U Trojského zámku 3, CZ–171 00 Praha 7, Czech Republic 3) Corresponding author: e-mail: [email protected] Received 10 February 2012; accepted 16 April 2012 Published 15 August 2012 Abstract. A new species of anole, Anolis sierramaestrae sp. nov., belonging to the “chamaeleolis” species group of the family Polychrotidae, is described from the mountain region in the vicinity of La Mula village, Santiago de Cuba province, Cuba. The species represents the sixth so far known species of the “chamaeleolis” species group. It resembles Anolis chamaeleonides Duméril et Bibron, 1837, but differs markedly in larger body size, long and narrow head shape, higher number of barb-like scales on dewlap, small number of large lateral scales on the body and dark-blue coloration of the eyes. Key words. Taxonomy, new species, herpetofauna, Polychrotidae, Chamaeleolis, Anolis, Great Antilles, Caribbean, Neotropical region. INTRODUCTION False chameleons of the genus Anolis Daudin, 1802 represent a highly ecologically specialized and morphologically distinct and unique clade endemic to Cuba Island (Cocteau 1838, Beuttell & Losos 1999, Schettino 2003, Losos 2009). This group has been traditionally recognized as a distinct genus Chamaeleolis Cocteau, 1838 due to its multiple derived morphological, eco- logical and behavioural characters. Recent studies discovering the cladogenesis of anoles have placed this group within the main body of the tree of Antillean anoles as a sister group of a small clade consisting of the Puerto Rican species Anolis cuvieri Merrem, 1820 and hispaniolan A.
    [Show full text]
  • First Report of Cannibalism in The
    WWW.IRCF.ORG/REPTILESANDAMPHIBIANSJOURNALTABLE OF CONTENTS IRCF REPTILES & IRCFAMPHIBIANS REPTILES • VOL 15,& NAMPHIBIANSO 4 • DEC 2008 •189 21(4):136–137 • DEC 2014 IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS CONSERVATION AND NATURAL HISTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS FEATURE ARTICLES First. Chasing Bullsnakes Report (Pituophis catenifer sayi) in Wisconsin:of Cannibalism in the On the Road to Understanding the Ecology and Conservation of the Midwest’s Giant Serpent ...................... Joshua M. Kapfer 190 . The Shared History of Treeboas (Corallus grenadensis) and Humans on Grenada: Saba AnoleA Hypothetical Excursion ( ............................................................................................................................Anolis sabanus), withRobert W. Hendersona Review 198 ofRESEARCH Cannibalism ARTICLES in West Indian Anoles . The Texas Horned Lizard in Central and Western Texas ....................... Emily Henry, Jason Brewer, Krista Mougey, and Gad Perry 204 . The Knight Anole (Anolis equestris) in Florida 1 2 .............................................Brian J. RobertCamposano, Powell Kenneth L. andKrysko, Adam Kevin M. Watkins Enge, Ellen M. Donlan, and Michael Granatosky 212 1Department of Biology, Avila University, Kansas City, Missouri 64145, USA ([email protected]) CONSERVATION ALERT 2Chizzilala Video Productions, Saba ([email protected]) . World’s Mammals in Crisis ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database
    Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History database Abdala, C. S., A. S. Quinteros, and R. E. Espinoza. 2008. Two new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the puna of northwestern Argentina. Herpetologica 64:458-471. Abdala, C. S., D. Baldo, R. A. Juárez, and R. E. Espinoza. 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont Iguanian: a new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. Copeia 104:487-497. Abdala, C. S., J. C. Acosta, M. R. Cabrera, H. J. Villaviciencio, and J. Marinero. 2009. A new Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. South American Journal of Herpetology 4:91-102. Abdala, C. S., J. L. Acosta, J. C. Acosta, B. B. Alvarez, F. Arias, L. J. Avila, . S. M. Zalba. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 26 (Suppl. 1):215-248. Abell, A. J. 1999. Male-female spacing patterns in the lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:185-194. Abts, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the Chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monographs 57:215-232. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2003. Anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Facultad de Ciencias. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2007. Anfibio y reptiles del Uruguay, 3rd edn. Montevideo, Uruguay: Serie Fauna 1. Ackermann, T. 2006. Schreibers Glatkopfleguan Leiocephalus schreibersii. Munich, Germany: Natur und Tier. Ackley, J. W., P. J. Muelleman, R. E. Carter, R. W. Henderson, and R. Powell. 2009. A rapid assessment of herpetofaunal diversity in variously altered habitats on Dominica.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Disease and Climate Change Across Borders
    Climate Change and Collapsing Thermal Niches of Mexican Endemic Reptiles White Paper for the Environmental Working Group of the UC-Mexico Initiative Barry Sinervo1, Rafael A. Lara Reséndiz1, 2, Donald B. Miles3, Jeffrey E. Lovich4, Joshua R. Ennen5, Johannes Müller6, Robert D. Cooper1, 7, Philip C. Rosen8, Joseph A. E. Stewart1, Juan Carlos Santos9, Jack W. Sites Jr.9, Paul M. Gibbons10, Eric V. Goode10, L. Scott Hillard7, 11, Luke Welton9, 12, Mickey Agha4, 13, Gabriel Caetano1, 14, Mercy Vaughn15, Cristina Meléndez Torres16, Héctor Gadsden17, Gamaliel Casteñada Gaytán18, Patricia Galina Tessaro19, Fernando I. Valle Jiménez19, Jorge Valdez Villavicencio20, Norberto Martínez Méndez21, Guillermo Woolrich Piña22, Víctor Luja Molina23, Aníbal Díaz de la Vega Pérez24, Diego M. Arenas Moreno2, Saúl Domínguez Guerrero2, Natalia Fierro2, Scott Butterfield25, Michael Westpha26, Raymond B. Huey27, William Mautz28, Víctor Sánchez Cordero29, and Fausto R. Méndez de la Cruz29 1. The Institute for the Study of the Ecological and Evolutionary Climate Impacts, University of California Santa Cruz 2. Laboratorio de Herpetología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México 3. Department of Biological Sciences, Ohio University 4. USGS, Southwest Biological Science Center, 5. Tennessee Aquarium Conservation Institute 6. Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions 7. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles 8. School of Natural Resources & the Environment, University of Arizona 9. Department of Biology, Brigham Young University 10. Turtle Conservancy 11. Turner Endangered Species Fund 12. University of Kansas Biodiversity Institute 13. Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis 14. Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade de Brasília 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny, Ecomorphological Evolution, and Historical Biogeography of the Anolis Cristatellus Series
    Uerpetological Monographs, 18, 2004, 90-126 © 2004 by The Herpetologists' League, Inc. PHYLOGENY, ECOMORPHOLOGICAL EVOLUTION, AND HISTORICAL BIOGEOGRAPHY OF THE ANOLIS CRISTATELLUS SERIES MATTHEW C. BRANDLEY^''^'"' AND KEVIN DE QUEIROZ^ ^Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History and Department of Zoology, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73072, USA ^Department of Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20,560, USA ABSTRACT: TO determine the evolutionary relationships within the Anolis cristatellus series, we employed phylogenetic analyses of previously published karyotype and allozyme data as well as newly collected morphological data and mitochondrial DNA sequences (fragments of the 12S RNA and cytochrome b genes). The relationships inferred from continuous maximum likelihood reanalyses of allozyme data were largely poorly supported. A similar analysis of the morphological data gave strong to moderate support for sister relationships of the two included distichoid species, the two trunk-crown species, the grass-bush species A. poncensis and A. pulchellus, and a clade of trunk-ground and grass-bush species. The results of maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses of the 12S, cyt b, and combined mtDNA data sets were largely congruent, but nonetheless exhibit some differences both with one another and with those based on the morphological data. We therefore took advantage of the additive properties of likelihoods to compare alternative phylogenetic trees and determined that the tree inferred from the combined 12S and cyt b data is also the best estimate of the phylogeny for the morphological and mtDNA data sets considered together. We also performed mixed-model Bayesian analyses of the combined morphology and mtDNA data; the resultant tree was topologically identical to the combined mtDNA tree with generally high nodal support.
    [Show full text]
  • Lizards As Model Organisms for Linking Phylogeographic and Speciation Studies
    Molecular Ecology (2010) 19, 3250–3270 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04722.x INVITED REVIEW Lizards as model organisms for linking phylogeographic and speciation studies ARLEY CAMARGO,* BARRY SINERVO† and JACK W. SITES JR.* *Department of Biology and Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA, †Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA Abstract Lizards have been model organisms for ecological and evolutionary studies from individual to community levels at multiple spatial and temporal scales. Here we highlight lizards as models for phylogeographic studies, review the published popula- tion genetics ⁄ phylogeography literature to summarize general patterns and trends and describe some studies that have contributed to conceptual advances. Our review includes 426 references and 452 case studies: this literature reflects a general trend of exponential growth associated with the theoretical and empirical expansions of the discipline. We describe recent lizard studies that have contributed to advances in understanding of several aspects of phylogeography, emphasize some linkages between phylogeography and speciation and suggest ways to expand phylogeographic studies to test alternative pattern-based modes of speciation. Allopatric speciation patterns can be tested by phylogeographic approaches if these are designed to discriminate among four alterna- tives based on the role of selection in driving divergence between populations, including: (i) passive divergence by genetic drift; (ii) adaptive divergence by natural selection (niche conservatism or ecological speciation); and (iii) socially-mediated speciation. Here we propose an expanded approach to compare patterns of variation in phylogeographic data sets that, when coupled with morphological and environmental data, can be used to discriminate among these alternative speciation patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • The Erratic and Contingent Progression of Research on Territoriality: a Case Study
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/107664; this version posted May 1, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. Kamath and Losos 1 Territorial Polygyny in Anolis Lizards The erratic and contingent progression of research on territoriality: a case study. Ambika Kamath1,2 and Jonathan Losos1 1. Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA. 2. [email protected] bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/107664; this version posted May 1, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. Kamath and Losos 2 Territorial Polygyny in Anolis Lizards ABSTRACT Our understanding of animal mating systems has changed dramatically with the advent of molecular methods to determine individuals’ reproductive success. But why are older behavioral descriptions and newer genetic descriptions of mating systems often seemingly inconsistent? We argue that a potentially important reason for such inconsistencies is a research trajectory rooted in early studies that were equivocal and overreaching, followed by studies that accepted earlier conclusions at face value and assumed, rather than tested, key ideas about animal mating systems. We illustrate our argument using Anolis lizards, whose social behavior has been studied for nearly a century.
    [Show full text]
  • Anolis Trinitatis (St. Vincent Anole) Family: Polychrotidae (Anoles and Tree Lizards) Order: Squamata (Lizards and Snakes) Class: Reptilia (Reptiles)
    UWI The Online Guide to the Animals of Trinidad and Tobago Ecology Anolis trinitatis (St. Vincent Anole) Family: Polychrotidae (Anoles and Tree Lizards) Order: Squamata (Lizards and Snakes) Class: Reptilia (Reptiles) Fig. 1. St. Vincent Anole, Anolis trinitatis. [http://www.karibische-anolis.de/Anolis-trinitatis.htm , downloaded 23 March 2015] TRAITS. Anolis trinitatis is a medium-sized anole (Anolis lizard), length from snout to vent (entire body excluding tail) 77mm in adult males and 57mm in females. The colour of A. trinitatis varies with sex. Males are bright green or blue-green shading to blue or blue-grey (Fig. 1) with the venter and lower part of its jaw being bright yellow, orbital area (around eye) bright blue to blue-grey or a dark black, cheek is either a buttery yellow or has a green wash. Females are a duller green, with a faint pale flank stripe present, often with mottled or herringbone mid- dorsal pattern, small dewlap, not distinctively coloured (Fig. 2). DISTRIBUTION. Anolis trinitatis is native to St Vincent and the Grenadines where it is widespread in all terrestrial habitats. A. trinitatis is also found in Trinidad where it is an invasive species in San Fernando and surroundings, St. Augustine and Port of Spain (Hailey et al., 2009) UWI The Online Guide to the Animals of Trinidad and Tobago Ecology HABITAT AND ACTIVITY. In St. Vincent and the Grenadines Anolis trinitatis is found in littoral, managed terrestrial and natural and semi-natural terrestrial environments; up to at least 900m above sea level and most live among trees. They are found where vertical structures are present, in open areas and in partly isolated situations and habitat edges.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Face of Accelerating Habitat Loss and an Increasing Human
    ABSTRACT Borkhataria, Rena Rebecca. Ecological and Political Implications of Conversion from Shade to Sun Coffee in Puerto Rico. (Under the direction of Jaime Collazo.) Recent studies have shown that biodiversity is greater in shaded plantations than in sun coffee plantations, yet many farmers are converting to sun coffee varieties to increase short-term yields or to gain access to economic incentives. Through conversion, ecosystem complexity may be reduced and ecological services rendered by inhabitants may be lost. I attempted to quantify differences in abundances and diversity of predators in sun and shade coffee plantations in Puerto Rico and to gain insight into the ecological services they might provide. I also interviewed coffee farmers to determine the factors influencing conversion to sun coffee in Puerto Rico and to examine their attitudes toward the conservation of wildlife. Avian abundances were significantly higher in shaded coffee than in sun (p = 0.01) as were the number of species (p = 0.09). Avian species that were significantly more abundant in shaded coffee tended to be insectivorous, whereas those in sun coffee were granivorous. Lizard abundances (all species combined) did not differ significantly between plantations types, but Anolis stratulus was more abundant in sun plantations and A. gundlachi and A. evermanni were present only in shaded plantations. Insect abundances (all species combined) were significantly higher in shaded coffee (p = 0.02). I used exclosures in a shaded coffee plantation to examine the effects of vertebrate predators on the arthropods associated with coffee, in particular the coffee leaf miner (Leucoptera coffeela) and the flatid planthopper Petrusa epilepsis, in a shaded coffee plantation in Puerto Rico.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Survey of Porto Rico and the Virgin Islands
    : NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES SCIENTIFIC SURVEY OF Porto Rico and the Virgin Islands VOLUME X NEW YORK Published by the Academy 1930 CONTENTS OF VOLUME X Page Title-page. Contents ^ Dates of Publication of Parts " List of Illustrations iv Amphibians and Land Reptiles of Porto Rico, with a List of Those Reported from the Virgin Islands. By Karl Patterson Schmidt 1 The Fishes of Porto Rico and the Virgin Islands—Branchiostomidae to Sciae- nidae. By J. T. Nichols 161 The Fishes of Porto Rico and the Virgin Islands—Pomacentridae to Ogcoce- phaUdae. By. J. T. Nichols 297 The Ascidians of Porto Rico and the Virgin Islands. By Willard G. Van Name 401 3 Index 5 ' Dates of Publication of Parts Part 1, November 22, 1928. ^ Part 2, September 10, 1929. ^"^ *7 jL mL. Part 3, March 15, 1930 Part 4, August 1, 1930 (iii) 'X -«^- AMPHIBIANS AND LAND REPTILES OF PORTO RICO With a List of Those Reported from the Virgin Islands By Karl Patterson Schmidt contents Page Introduction 3 Itinerary and collections made 4 Other material examined 4 Plan of work 5 Acknowledgments 6 Porto Rican herpetology since 1904 6 Lists of the amphibians and land reptiles of Porto Rico and the adjacent islands 7 Habitat associations and faunal subdivisions 9 Origin and relations of the Porto Rican herpetological fauna 12 Systematic account of the species 30 Class Amphibia 30 Order SaUentia 30 Family Bufonidae 30 Key to the genera of Porto Rican frogs and toads 30 Bufo Laurenti 31 Key to the Porto Rican species of true toads 31 Bufo lemur (Cope) 31 Bufo marinus (Linne) 34 Leptodactylus
    [Show full text]