DOCSLIB.ORG

18 ======Some History of Central Park

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
18 ======Some History of Central Park ===================================================================== RNA House History Club Session Seventeen March 4, 2018 ===================================================================== Some History of Central Park The story of Central Park is complex and stretches from 1850 to the present, over 160 years. Leading up to the decision to create a grand public park in the 1850s was the growth and expansion of NYC. In the first half the 19th Century, New York City's population grew from ninety thousand to half a million. Most of the over 500,000 New Yorkers lived south of 30th Street. Lower Manhattan was lively and noisy with some densely packed poor districts. There were a few public spaces like City Hall Park and Battery Park and some gated parks for the wealthy, but there was not much green space within the central city. While most New Yorkers lived in lower Manhattan, by 1850, over 20,000 New Yorkers some wealthy, some poorer, had moved to the outer districts, what are now the UWS, Central Park, the UES and Harlem. These districts were comprised of scattered mansions and estates and small, distinct villages, existing independently of each other and some farms. Even though a State commission had laid out a street grid plan for NYC in 1811, due to irregular landholdings and natural obstructions the grid plan did not have much effect in the outer districts until later in the 19th Century. NYC owned some of the land. Large plots were owned by wealthy families and some small plots were individually own. The extension of trade lines, the expansion of craft production into sweatshop manufacturing, and the organization of banks and insurance and railroad companies had transformed the port of New York into a national shipping, industrial, and financial center. More and more, wealthy NYC merchants and landowners travelled to Europe for business or pleasure. Some were impressed with public grounds like the Bois de Boulogne in Paris and Hyde Park in London. In these parks, people were able to escape the city environment without leaving the city. Wealthy merchants and travelers returning to NYC began advocating in their own circles and in their newspapers for the city government to create a new grand park. A public park some argued would offer their own families an attractive setting for carriage rides in an almost county like setting and provide working-class New Yorkers with a healthy alternative to the saloon. Other classes of people joined the clamor for more public open spaces for fresh air, for a rural like feeling, for more prestige for NYC. Not everyone wanted to have only the wealthy served with a grand park. The newspapers that served working and middle class people advocated for NYC to create instead many small public parks in the more working class districts for ordinary people to have some of the advantages of a park. The first pressure on NYC to create a new grand park came in the early 1850s from merchant/landowners who advocated for a site overlooking the East River, the Jones Woods from present-day 66th Street to 75th Street East of what is now Third Ave. But it became clear that those most strongly advocating for that site were the very landowners who would most benefit from the great increase of value of land they owned in that area. An anonymous reader charged in a letter to the Journal of Commerce that "Mr. Beekman our Senator is too deeply interested in the neighborhood of the contemplated Park to be an impartial judge of its feasibility. He and his family have a large extent of land there which will be greatly augmented in value by this operation." Other landowners further west also argued against the Jones Woods site, that a new public park should not be on one side of Manhattan or the other. It should be a central park. The authors of The Park and the People write: "The decision to build the grand park, although clothed in democratic rhetoric, was fundamentally rooted in the interests of New York's wealthiest citizens — its gentlemen and ladies. Leading merchants and bankers and their families advocated creating a grand public park in order to promote their city's (and their own) 1 cosmopolitan stature. They were joined by uptown landowners, who wanted a park to enhance real estate values. But not all New Yorkers agreed that the city needed such an expensive public symbol of its grandeur. Yet, despite the opposition, the park's gentlemen advocates claimed to represent the entire "public". Only after a three-year debate over the necessity, location, and financing of a public park was the site selected. In choosing a site and taking the land for a democratic public park, the gentlemen swept aside the concerns of poor New Yorkers." After three years of debate over the park site and cost, in 1853 the state legislature authorized the City of New York to use the power of eminent domain to acquire more than 700 acres of land in the center of Manhattan for the park. The land chosen to become Central Park, 59th St to 106th St between Fifth and Eighth Ave (now CPW) was occupied by a few wealthy estates and by over 1,600 free Blacks and Irish and German immigrant owners, renters and some squatters The most developed section of the site that was to become Central Park was known as Seneca Village. It stretched approximately from West 82nd to West 88th streets just east of what is today Central Park West. Seneca Village started when Black New Yorkers purchased land there and began to build houses in the mid 1820s. It grew to be the largest community of free African-American property owners in New York, paying taxes and some eligible to vote. But also Seneca Village was integrated. Of the 264 people known to be living in Seneca Village in 1855, 30% were Irish and a few Germans and mixed. Of the three churches in Seneca Village two were African American and one, All Angels' Church, was built there by St Michael's Church on Amsterdam Ave and 99th St for the Blacks and Irish and Germans living in and around Seneca Village. The African Union Church housed the Colored School No. 3 set up in the 1840s. The churches were along the main street of the village, known as Old Lane. For the most part, the people of Seneca Village would have been considered middle class in today's terms. They were the city's most stable African-American settlement. Besides Seneca Village, there was, in the NE corner of what was to be Central Park, the Roman Catholic Sisters of Charity convent and school with 70 sisters, several substantial buildings and 200 boarding students. Also, throughout the site, modest wooden houses some substantial were built. Of the people living in the park, some owned their land, others rented from absentee land lords or from their neighbors and some built on land whose owners were unknown. There were grocery, bakery and butcher shops and gardens to raise food. Some people kept goats and pigs for the same purpose or to be sold. Also, there were some small businesses like leather dressers and bone boilers. Before the construction of the park could start, the area was cleared of its inhabitants and their dwellings. The residents were evicted under the rule of eminent domain during 1856-57. The City of New York paid about $5,000,000 in total to the upper income people who owned most of the land (21 land holders owned about half the park land.) and to others who owned small plots. Some small amounts were paid to renters who had long term leases and who lost their places to live. The amount offered to each landowner was determined by a special commission which allowed for appeals of its judgments. Most appeals failed. Many of those forced to abandon their homes and businesses and churches, simply moved west into the area we now call the Upper West Side, rebuilding their houses on unoccupied lots. There is no evidence that the Seneca Village community stayed together. The money to pay compensation for the land and for the construction came from general NYC taxpayer funds and from an assessment on owners of land that would be fronting on the park or within one mile who would benefit the most from increased land value. Including the construction, the total cost was over $10,000,000. Central Park as it became known was the first landscaped public park in the United States. The start of construction of Central Park sparked a 2 speculative land boom over the land surrounding the future park. It was not the first time in NYC and not the last that poorer people had to make way for the purposes of those with more wealth. The extension of the northern boundary to 110th Street in 1863 brought the park to its current 843 acres. By eminent domain, NYC had taken 6% of Manhattan's land property out of the private real estate market likely in perpetuity for the public purpose of a park. Like urban renewal a century later, some New Yorkers benefitted but other New Yorkers lost their homes. In this process, the city altered its relationship to both public and private land. The park represented a new concept of public property held in trust for the community's cultural rather than its economic benefit. Whereas in the eighteenth century city government principally concerned itself with facilitating commerce, now citizens looked to government to provide and administer resources for a common good that included the benefits of recreation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Collection 42
    THE CLOISTERS ARCHIVES Collection No. 30 The Cloisters Cross Research Papers Processed March 2014 and May 2019 The Cloisters Library The Metropolitan Museum of Art Ft. Tryon Park 99 Margaret Corbin Dr. New York, NY 10040 (212) 396-5365 [email protected] Collection Summary Title: The Cloisters Cross Research Papers Creators: Longland, Sabrina, Katherine Serrell Rorimer Dates: 1960-69; 1980-2000 Extent: 5 linear feet (11 boxes) Abstract: This collection relates to research conducted on “The Cloisters Cross” (Met Collection 63.12). Sabrina Longland was a Research Assistant with the Medieval Department of the Metropolitan Museum in the 1960s. Her papers (Series I) deal primarily with iconographic and historical research she conducted on behalf of Cloisters’ curator and later Met Director Thomas P. Hoving on The Cloisters Cross and related medieval pieces. Her papers involve Ms. Longland's research notes, photographs, reprints, published material, and correspondence. Series II, the papers of Katherine S. Rorimer relate to her investigations and writings to correct and refute inaccuracies found in Hoving’s 1981 book King of the Confessors, which recounts the acquisition of The Cloisters Cross by the Met (when Katherine Rorimer’s husband James was the museum Director). This series includes extensive research correspondence with Met and other museum professionals, and documents her attempts to publish numerous manuscripts on the topic, drafts of which are included in the collection. Administrative Information Provenance: The Longland papers would have been originally filed in the Medieval Department offices at the main building of the Metropolitan Museum. The date and circumstances of their transferal to The Cloisters archives is unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Stars Are Born and Legends Are Made™
    Where Stars are Born and Legends are Made™ The Apollo Theater Study Guide is published by the Education Program of the Apollo Theater in New York, NY | Volume 2, Issue 1, November 2010 If the Apollo Theater could talk, imagine the stories it could tell. It The has witnessed a lot of history, and seen a century’s worth of excitement. The theater itself has stood proudly on 125th Street since 1914, when it started life as a burlesque house for whites only, Hurtig & Seamon’s New Burlesque Theater. Dancers in skimpy costumes stripped down to flesh-colored leotards, and comics told bawdy jokes – that is, until then New York City Mayor Fiorello H. LaGuardia made the decision to close down burlesque houses all over the city. When the doors of the burlesque theaters were padlocked, the building was sold. By S ul the time it reopened in 1934, a new name proclaimed itself from the marquee: the 125th Street Apollo Theatre. From the start, the Apollo was beloved by Harlemites, and immediately of became an integral part of Harlem life. When the Apollo first opened, Harlem boasted a lot of theaters and clubs. But many didn’t admit black audiences. Though the musicians who played in the clubs were black, the audiences were often white; the country still had a lot to American learn about integration. But the Apollo didn’t play primarily to whites. As soon as it opened its doors, black residents of Harlem streamed in themselves to enjoy the show. In the early years, the Apollo presented acts in a revue format, with a variety of acts on each bill.
    [Show full text]
  • The Seneca Village Project Studying a 19Th-Century African American Community in Contemporary New York City
    ARTICLE THE SENECA VILLAGE PROJECT STUDYING A 19TH-CENTURY AFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY IN CONTEMPORARY NEW YORK CITY Nan A. Rothschild and Diana diZerega Wall Nan Rothschild is Ann Whitney Olin Professor of Anthropology at Barnard College, Columbia University, and Diana diZerega Wall is Professor of Anthropol- ogy at the Graduate Center and the City College of the City University of New York. ver the last few years, the authors have been working build a large park. After a lot of political wrangling (Rosen- with educator Cynthia Copeland of the New-York His- zweig and Blackmar 1992), the city chose the site of today’s Otorical Society on the study of Seneca Village, a nine- Central Park, and in 1856, it evicted the 1,700 people who lived teenth-century African American and Irish immigrant com- in the area, including the residents of Seneca Village, by right munity located on land which today is part of Central Park in of eminent domain. After the eviction, Seneca Village appears New York City. The project is in some ways conventional, but to have been forgotten for almost a century and a half. in others, unusual. On the conventional side, we have been using methods typical of recent research in historical archaeol- The Project ogy: the study of documents and the use of geophysics and other non-ground-disturbing techniques prior to a hoped-for Historians Roy Rosenzweig and Elizabeth Blackmar sparked excavation. The unusual aspects of the project relate to two fac- modern interest in the village with the publication of their tors: one, that the project area is located within today’s Central book The Park and the People (1992), a history of the park that Park, and two, that it was the home of African Americans and devoted most of a chapter to Seneca Village.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 201720172017
    2017 2017 2017 2017 Fall Fall Fall Fall This content downloaded from 024.136.113.202 on December 13, 2017 10:53:41 AM All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c). American Art SummerFall 2017 2017 • 31/3 • 31/2 University of Chicago Press $20 $20 $20 $20 USA USA USA USA 1073-9300(201723)31:3;1-T 1073-9300(201723)31:3;1-T 1073-9300(201723)31:3;1-T 1073-9300(201723)31:3;1-T reform reform reform reform cameras cameras cameras cameras “prints” “prints” “prints” “prints” and and and and memory memory memory memory playground playground playground playground of of of Kent’s of Kent’s Kent’s Kent’s guns, guns, guns, guns, abolitionism abolitionism abolitionism abolitionism art art art art and and and and the the the the Rockwell literary Rockwell Rockwell literary literary Rockwell issue literary issue issue issue Group, and Group, and Group, and Group, and in in in in this this this this Homer—dogs, Homer—dogs, Homer—dogs, Place Homer—dogs, Place Place Place In In In In nostalgia Park nostalgia nostalgia Park Park nostalgia Park Duncanson’s Duncanson’s Duncanson’s Duncanson’s Christenberry the Christenberry S. Christenberry the S. the S. Christenberry the S. Winslow Winslow Winslow Winslow with with with with Robert Robert Robert Robert Suvero, Suvero, Suvero, Suvero, William William William William di di di Technological di Technological Technological Technological Hunting Hunting Hunting Hunting Mark Mark Mark Mark Kinetics of Liberation in Mark di Suvero’s Play Sculpture Melissa Ragain Let’s begin with a typical comparison of a wood construction by Mark di Suvero with one of Tony Smith’s solitary cubes (fgs.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography Abram - Michell
    Landscape Design A Cultural and Architectural History 1 Bibliography Abram - Michell Surveys, Reference Books, Philosophy, and Nikolaus Pevsner. The Penguin Dictionary Nancy, Jean-Luc. Community: The Inoperative Studies in Psychology and the Humanities of Architecture and Landscape Architecture. Community. Edited by Peter Connor. Translated 5th ed. London: Penguin Books, 1998. by Peter Connor, Lisa Garbus, Michael Abram, David. The Spell of the Sensuous: Holland, and Simona Sawhney. Minneapolis: Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human Foucault, Michel. The Order of Being: University of Minnesota Press, 1991. World. New York: Pantheon Books, 1996. An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. Translated by [tk]. New York: Vintage Books, Newton, Norman T. Design on the Land: Ackerman, James S. The Villa: Form and 1994. Originally published as Les Mots The Development of Landscape Architecture. Ideology of Country Houses. Princeton, et les choses (Paris: Gallimard, 1966). Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971. N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1990. Giedion, Sigfried. Space, Time and Architecture. Ross, Stephanie. What Gardens Mean. Chicago Bachelard, Gaston. The Poetics of Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1967. and London: University of Chicago Press, 1998. Space. Translated by Maria Jolas. Boston: Beacon Press, 1969. Gothein, Marie Luise. Translated by Saudan, Michel, and Sylvia Saudan-Skira. Mrs. Archer-Hind. A History of Garden From Folly to Follies: Discovering the World of Barthes, Roland. The Eiffel Tower and Other Art. New York: E. P. Dutton, 1928. Gardens. New York: Abbeville Press. 1988. Mythologies. Translated by Richard Howard. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1979. Hall, Peter. Cities in Civilization: Schama, Simon. Landscape and Memory. The City as Cultural Crucible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Name Curriculum : Exploring Names, Naming, and Identity
    Bank Street College of Education Educate Graduate Student Independent Studies Spring 5-9-2021 The name curriculum : exploring names, naming, and identity Isabel Taswell Follow this and additional works at: https://educate.bankstreet.edu/independent-studies Part of the Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Curriculum and Social Inquiry Commons, Early Childhood Education Commons, and the Language and Literacy Education Commons 1 The Name Curriculum: Exploring Names, Naming, and Identity Isabel A. Taswell Cross-Age: Early Childhood and Childhood General Education Mentor: Ellen Ferrin Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Science in Education Bank Street College of Education 2021 2 Abstract The act of naming, or using and respecting one’s name, is a humanizing act: it is foundational to one’s sense of identity and belonging. Conversely, the act of ‘de-naming,’ or changing, forgetting, or erasing one’s name, is an act of dehumanization: it denies one’s sense of identity and belonging. The Name Curriculum provides an opportunity for third grade students to explore the role of names and naming as they relate to one’s sense of self and community. It draws on the role of developmental psychology, the urgency of historical context, and the power of children’s literature. Specifically, it explores how language development informs a connection between one’s name and sense of self, how patterns within and across historical events exemplify connections between naming and oppression, and how children’s literature can provide accessible entry points for meaningful conversations about naming, identity, and belonging. Over the course of the year, students consider questions related to names, identity, oppression, power, and belonging.
    [Show full text]
  • Adventure Playground: Essentially, to a Place of Pleasure—That Today It Surrounds Us, Everywhere, Having Quietly John V
    The city’s onscreen prominence is so taken for granted today that it is hard to imagine that as late as 1965, the last year of Robert F. Wagner’s mayoralty, New York hardly appeared in films at all. That year, only two features were shot substantially in the city: The Pawnbroker, an early landmark in the career of veteran New York director Sidney Lumet, and A Thousand Clowns, directed by Fred Coe, which used extensive location work to “open up” a Broadway stage hit of a few years earlier by the playwright Herb Gardner. The big change came with Wagner’s successor, John V. Lindsay—who, soon after taking office in 1966, made New York the first city in history to encourage location filmmaking: establishing a simple, one-stop permit process through a newly created agency (now called the Mayor’s Office of Film, Theatre and Broadcasting), creating a special unit of the Police Department to assist filmmakers, and ordering all city agencies and departments to cooperate with producers and directors (1). The founding of the Mayor’s Film Office—the first agency of its kind in the world—remains to this day one of the Lindsay administration’s signal achievements, an innovation in governance which has been replicated by agencies or commissions in almost every city and state in the Union, and scores of countries and provinces around the world. In New York, it helped to usher in a new industry, now generating over five billion dollars a year in economic activity and bringing work to more than 100,000 New Yorkers: renowned directors and stars, working actors and technicians, and tens of thousands of men and women employed by supporting businesses—from equipment rental houses, to scenery shops, to major studio complexes that now rival those of Southern California.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Park the Upper East Side
    Hunter College High School The Jewish Museum Pascalou Sarabeth’s DINING & HOTELS Nightingale-Bamford School jacqueline kennedy onassis reservoir Yura on Madison The Dalton School RETAIL & SPECIALTY SHOPS Convent of the Sacred Heart First Program The Spence School Cooper-Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum SCHOOLS MUSEUMS & INSTITUTIONS National Academy Museum National Academy School of Fine Art SALONS Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum Saint David’s School ART GALLERIES The Dalton School museum mile 86th Neue Gallerie Morgenthal Frederics Theory Park Avenue Christian Church Day School the great lawn Lululemon Athletica Ramaz James Perse School Regis High School Grazie madison ave The Metropolitan Museum of Art Warren Tricomi Salon . fifth ave Marymount School delacourt theater Tambaran Gallery William Greenberg Desserts . American Museum of Natural History Loyola School & Hayden Planetarium turtle pond Crawford Doyle Booksellers belvedere castle Aesop PS 6 E.A.T. Adam Williams Fine Art New York Rudolf Steiner School Barbour . park ave Historical Society l’Occitane Skarstedt Gallery 79th Acquavella Gallery Gallery Mourlot Serafina All Souls School Almine Rech Gallery Lilly Pulitzer La Maison du Chocolat Alain Mikli Saint James Clothing Boutique Lady M Cake Boutique Sant Ambroeus Missoni central park The Mark Hotel Castelli Gallery Vera Wang Bride Allen Stevenson Gagosian Gallery Bemelmans Bar School the lake Vince The Carlyle Hotel Juice Press Cafe Boulud & Bar Pleiades loeb boathouse The Surrey Hotel Safani Gallery John Freida Salon Lenox Hill Hospital Christian Louboutin Carolina Herrera Diptyque Kilian strawberry fields French Consulate Apple The Met Breuer The Hewitt School David Webb bethesda fountain . Caravaggio Nancy Wiener Gallery Marché Madison Maison du Vin .
    [Show full text]
  • Central Park Self Guided Tours
    Free Tours by Foot - Central Park Self Guided Tours We've developed this self-guided Central Park Tour as a tool to see what Central Park has to offer and how to go about seeing it. It's also a great companion to take along on one of our guided Central Park tours. Quick Park Stats Size: 843 acres Year Started: 1857 Officially Completed: 1873 The park was a massive undertaking. Over 1500 residents had to be cleared from the area, particularly in Seneca Village. Even just preparing the land for landscaping was a feat. The Manhattan schist that makes up the island had to blast apart in many areas using gunpowder. There was more gunpowder used in building Central Park than was used in the Battle of Gettysburg in the American Civil War. It was also determined that the soil in the area was not suitable for all of the planting that was planned. The topsoil was removed, and new soil was brought in from New Jersey. All in all, during the park’s construction, more than 10 million cartloads of rubble were carted out. Central Park was designed as an urban oasis to give New Yorkers an escape from the crowded city. The original design for New York, laid out by the City Commissioners in 1811 did not include a park. Between that time and the 1850’s, the city of New York quadrupled in size. As the city got more and more crowded, New Yorkers started seeking a respite. Landscaped cemeteries became a popular place to hang out because they were among the only public green spaces in the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Treasures of Tutankhamun" Exhibition, 1975-1979
    Irvine MacManus records related to "Treasures of Tutankhamun" exhibition, 1975-1979 Finding aid prepared by Celia Hartmann Processing of this collection was funded by a generous grant from the Leon Levy Foundation This finding aid was generated using Archivists' Toolkit on July 03, 2013 The Metropolitan Museum of Art Archives 1000 Fifth Avenue New York, NY, 10028-0198 212-570-3937 [email protected] Irvine MacManus records related to "Treasures of Tutankhamun" exhibition, 1975-1979 Table of Contents Summary Information .......................................................................................................3 Historical note..................................................................................................................... 4 Scope and Contents note.....................................................................................................5 Arrangement note................................................................................................................ 6 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 6 Related Materials .............................................................................................................. 6 Controlled Access Headings............................................................................................... 6 Collection Inventory............................................................................................................8 Series I. Planning and Administration.........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New York City Get-A-Way Vacation Package for Two (2) Includes
    New York City Get-A-Way Vacation Package for two (2) includes: • Three (3) Nights at the Sheraton New York Times Square (Note 1) • Tickets to the Broadway Play … Chicago • Empire State Building Observatory admission • Top of the Rock Observation Deck admission • State of Liberty Express Tour • 9/11 Memorial & Museum Night Tour • Central Park Bike Day Rental • Lower Manhattan & Brooklyn 2-hour Photo Tour • Dinner: Tavern on the Green … Restored Central Park icon for American fare in an elegant setting with courtyard & garden seating. (Note 2) • Dinner: The View Restaurant & Lounge … Revolving American bar & grill on the 48th floor of the Marriott Marquis with Times Square views. (Note 3) • Choice of Admission to: American Museum of Natural History, Museum of the City of New York or the Circle Line Harbor Cruise • Admission to the Metropolitan Museum of Art • Shopping discounts at Macy’s, Bloomingdale’s, The Shops at Columbus Circle and Century 21 • Free Gift with purchase at Bloomingdale’s • NYCVP Insider Tips • NYC Manhattan and Midtown Concierge Map • 24-Hour Emergency Travel Assistance Notes: 1 – Accommodations allowance is a total of $ 419.00 / night. 2 – Dinner allowance is a total of $ 116.00 per person. 3 - Dinner allowance is a total of $ 119.00 per person. WINNER of the Chance Drawing will also receive $1,500 in CASH. Special Offer !! If the WINNER of the Chance Drawing desires a vacation other than to New York City, those changes can be processed by Pamela White at Time 2 Travel Agency. Additional Details regarding Accommodations and Dining Sheraton New York Times Square Room Category: Executive Suite Location: Midtown West Side Maximum Occupancy: 3 (Maximum 2 Adults) 1 King Bed and 1 Sofabed No Resort or Facility Fee Hotel allowance average is 419.00 per night Tavern on the Green Dine in the middle of the New York City’s world-renowned Central Park at Tavern on the Green.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Park Confidential Luminary New Yorkers Reveal Their Favorite Patches of Manhattan’S Great Lawn
    City Life Mar07 2/1/07 12:16 PM Page 66 CityLife INSIDERS GUIDE Central Park Confidential Luminary New Yorkers reveal their favorite patches of Manhattan’s Great Lawn. By MARGIE GOLDSMITH rider on a brown and white paint horse trots along a dirt path under an archway of fragrant cherry trees; a lawn bowler dressed Bow Bridge. in white rolls a ball down a manicured playing field; a birder BOW BRIDGE Many a trains her binoculars on a great egret; a polar bear does under- marriage proposal has taken water flip turns. No, this is not an advertisement for some far- place here, surrounded by the Lake, the Ramble, and the New flung vacation spot. These are just a few of the activities that take York City skyline. “I can’t stop Aplace every day in Central Park, an urban oasis smack in the heart of New York taking pictures, because it’s always a Kodak moment,” says City. Most visitors taking a horse-and-carriage ride think they’ve seen the Park, Central Park photographer and but they’ve only glimpsed a small corner. New Yorkers know there’s so much more historian Sara Cedar Miller. Bow Bridge is one of 36 to this 843-acre respite. Here are some much loved spots: bridges and arches in the park connect- ing 58 miles of THE CAROUSEL Le Cirque pathways. HECKSCHER PLAYGROUND owner Sirio Maccioni is one Let your inner child out at the of the many New Yorkers newly restored Heckscher Play- over the past 136 years who ground, the largest of the park’s have brought their kids to 21 playgrounds, with adult and this merry-go-round, one of children’s swings, seesaws, a the largest in the country.
    [Show full text]