Society and Burials from Central-Western Macedon, 550–300 BCE: Intersections of Gender, Age, and Status
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Society and Burials from Central-Western Macedon, 550–300 BCE: Intersections of Gender, Age, and Status by Elina M. Salminen A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Classical Art and Archaeology) in The University of Michigan 2018 Doctoral Committee: Professor Lisa Nevett, Chair Dr. Despina Margomenou Associate Professor Ian Moyer Professor Janet Richards Elina M. Salminen [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1944-3779 © Elina M. Salminen 2018 Äidilleni ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS It takes a village, they say, but sometimes it takes two entire continents. I entered the US and the Interdepartmental Program in Classical Art and Archaeology at the University of Michigan with decidedly immature ideas about what this dissertation would look like, and the main credit (but none of the blame) for this dissertation reaching maturity lies with the intellectual, material, and social support I received during my years in the program. First and foremost, Lisa Nevett has been and continues to be a wonderful mentor and advocate. Over the past seven years, she has modeled for me what it means to be a great scholar, a good colleague, and a kind human being. She carefully read and discussed this piece of work in all its iterations, and patiently guided me through my existential angst and sloppy language. (All remaining split infinitives are my own.) Despina Margomenou, Ian Moyer, and Janet Richards contributed their breadth of knowledge thoughtfully and with enthusiasm, helping me see the bigger picture and the relevance of my work to other scholarly questions. This dissertation is better for their perspectives and their impressive ability to engage in work across disciplinary and geographical boundaries. Many people in the US, Greece, and Finland generously shared their expertise on specific topics discussed in this dissertation. Early on, Natalie Abell and Antonis Kotsonas answered some of my questions on ceramics and helped me settle on a typology for my database. Aimee iii Genova provided suggestions for bibliography on early Greek archaeology, and Katherine Harrington did the same for loomweights. Anna Bonnell Freidin kindly shared her insight on maternal mortality, while Chryssa Bourbou answered my questions on child burials. Nicole Scholtz, Tuomo Virolainen, and countless people at Consulting for Statistics, Computing, and Analytics Research at U-M helped with coding, GSI, and statistics. Later on in the process, Elizabeth Carney offered invaluable comments on Chapter 5. I am especially grateful to Anastasia and Pavlos Chrysostomou who answered some of my questions and shared a difficult- to-find publication on the Edessa cemeteries with me. My peers and colleagues in the Interdepartmental Program also deserve a special thank- you. Their brilliance inspires me on a daily basis, and it has been a joy to be a part of such a supportive, kind, and sharing community of young scholars. I can’t wait to see their future journeys and successes. Finally, I am grateful to the people who supported me throughout this journey as a human being as well as a scholar. Of my friends, Heta Björklund deserves a special shout-out for always being there for me, often with her delightfully caustic wit. My extended family in Finland will always see me as Elina rather than as an academic, and for that I am deeply grateful. This dissertation is, as everything I ever do, dedicated to my mother, Anne Salminen. Every day, she – along with our Greek rescue Dalia – continues to teach me how to be a human being in the world. Her constant support of even my more hare-brained ideas, her relentless kindness, and her raucuous laughter at her own jokes have made this dissertation, along with everything else, possible. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Dedication ii Acknowledgments iii List of Tables x List of Figures xiii List of Maps xv List of Abbreviations xvi Abstract xvii Part I: Mortuary theory and Macedonian mortuary behavior Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1 The periphery: early scholarship 5 1.2 What is Macedon? A working definition 7 1.3 Toward synthesis: scholarship and fieldwork since 1980 11 1.4 Limitations and future directions 17 1.5 Overview of the dissertation 18 Chapter 2: Theoretical frameworks and methodological approaches to the mortuary record 20 2.1 “Multiply-burdened”: identity theory and intersectional feminism 21 2.1.1 Approaches to identity in archaeology: a brief history 23 v 2.1.2 Gender, feminist theory, and intersectionality 29 2.1.3 The individual in archaeology 37 2.2 Writ in water, carved in stone: mortuary archaeology 39 2.2.1 Agency and the ontology of the mortuary record: a brief history 40 2.2.2 Landscape approaches 47 2.2.3 Mortuary expenditure 50 2.3 Operationalizing identity and feminist theory: methodology 52 2.3.1 Database 56 2.3.2 Analytical methods 58 2.3.3 A note on terminology 59 Chapter 3: Macedonian mortuary behavior 61 3.1 Spatial and chronological boundaries 63 3.2 Key sites 71 3.3 Mortuary customs 84 3.3.1 The location and spatial organization of cemeteries 84 3.3.2 Types of burials 85 3.3.3 Body treatment 95 3.3.4 Assemblages 98 3.3.5 The afterlife and ancestors 100 3.4 Conclusion: narrative of a burial 107 Part II: Social personae Chapter 4: War and wine sacks: Macedonian men 111 4.1 Studies of ancient masculinity and the Homeric model 112 vi 4.2 Osteological evidence 117 4.3 Grave types and orientation 122 4.4 Warriors and military equipment: Homeric warriors and hetairoi? 125 4.4.1 Macedonian warriors in literary sources 126 4.4.2 Prevalence of military equipment 129 4.4.3 Sets of weapons: Archaic Arkhontiko 132 4.4.4 Diachronic change 137 4.4.5 Hellenistic elite warriors 139 4.4.6 Discussion: military equipment 142 4.5 Vessels for drinking and feasting 144 4.5.1 Macedonian drinking in literary sources and scholarship 145 4.5.2 Ceramic vessels 148 4.5.3 Metal vessels 151 4.5.4 Discussion: vessels 153 4.6 Body treatment 154 4.7 In search of athleticism 156 4.8 Observers of the skies, salt of the earth: other aspects of manhood 158 4.8.1 Learned men 158 4.8.2 Farmers and hunters 160 4.9 Conclusions 161 Chapter 5: Phialai and family feeling: women 164 5.1 Textual and other sources: rulers, warriors, priestesses 166 5.2 Osteological evidence 174 vii 5.3 Grave types and orientation 179 5.4 Groupings within and among graves 180 5.5 Beauty and personal adornment 190 5.5.1 Toiletry vessels 190 5.5.2 Jewelry and mirrors 193 5.5.3 Dress 196 5.6 Evidence for religious practices 198 5.6.1 Ritual vessels 198 5.6.2 Figurines 200 5.6.3 Ladies of Arkhontiko and Aegae: Archaic priestesses? 203 5.7 Production and ownership 207 5.8 Encroaching on the male realm: vessels and weapons 210 5.8.1 Ceramic and metal vessels 211 5.8.2 Vase-painting 214 5.8.3 Weapons and feminine jewelry: female warriors? 217 5.9 Conclusion 220 Chapter 6: “Arrows in the hand of a mighty man”: children 224 6.1 Previous scholarship and literary sources 226 6.2 Osteological evidence and spatial distribution 230 6.3 Status and wealth 235 6.4 Gendering 239 6.5 Conclusion 245 viii Part III: Hierarchy and variation Chapter 7: Visible monuments, hidden value: hierarchy 248 7.1 Historians’ approaches 251 7.2 In search of value: cost and rarity 256 7.2.1 Prevalence 257 7.2.2 Cost 259 7.2.3 The intersection of cost and value 268 7.2.4 The cost of grave types 272 7.3 Inequality 274 7.4 Viewsheds 278 7.5 Conclusion 289 Chapter 8: Diachronic and regional variation 292 8.1 Regional variation 295 8.1.1 Balkan or Greek? – Balkan and Greek 295 8.1.2 Local wares versus imports 299 8.1.3 Variation by region 302 8.2 Variation by date 310 8.3 Conclusion 317 Chapter 9: Conclusion 320 Works cited 329 ix LIST OF TABLES 1.1. Chronology of the main textual and archaeological sources 3 2.1. Tendencies and hierarchies in the study of the past 29 3.1. Classification of the sites discussed into groups using two different systems 70 3.2. Overview of the data by site 72 3.3. Prevalence of artifact classes across all burials 99 4.1. Burial types of osteologically studied males 123 4.2. Burial types of osteologically studied females 123 4.3. Real and expected counts for different types of burials across the entire dataset and by gender 124 4.4. Prevalence of weapons by type 131 4.5. Most common sets of weapons 131 4.6. Archaic Arkhontiko warrior burials by category 133 4.7. Summary of weapons sets from Archaic Arkhontiko 135 4.8. Prevalence of military equipment across all the sites by period 137 4.9. Counts of weapons from Classical and Hellenistic graves that are among the top-25% wealthiest graves and which contained more than three items of military equipment 141 4.10. Prevalence of vessel shapes as percentage of graves which contained each given shape 148 x 4.11. Prevalence of metal vessels by period 152 5.1. Graves with multiple individuals 182 5.2. Prevalence of toiletry vessel shapes in percentage 191 5.3. Distribution of askoi and unguentaria 191 5.4. Distribution of jewelry by type of grave 193 5.5. Prevalence of vessel shapes as percentage of graves which contained each given shape 211 5.6.