DOCSLIB.ORG

"What's Love Got to Do with It?["] : the Dynamics of Desire, Race and Murder in the Slave South/ Carolyn

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 1-1-2002 "What's love got to do with it?["] : the dynamics of desire, race and murder in the slave South/ Carolyn. Powell University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1 Recommended Citation Powell, Carolyn., ""What's love got to do with it?["] : the dynamics of desire, race and murder in the slave South/" (2002). Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014. 913. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1/913 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. \ UMASS. DATE DUE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST "WHAT'S LOVE GOT TO DO WITH IT? : THE DYNAMICS OF DESIRE, RACE AND MURDER IN THE SLAVE SOUTH A Dissertation Presented by CAROLYN J. POWELL Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment Of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy February 2002 Department of Afro American Studies © Copyright by Carolyn J. Powell 2002 All Rights Reserved : "WHAT'S LOVE GOT TO DO WITH IT? THE DYNAMICS OF DESIRE, RACE AND MURDER IN THE SLAVE SOUTH A Dissertation Presented by CAROLYN J. POWELL Approved as to style and content by: Manisha Sinha, Johjji H. Bracey, Membw William L. Strickland, Member Susan J. Tracy, Member Esther M.A. Terry, Chair Department of Afro American Studies DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my parents, Mr. Clarence Powell and Mrs. Sylvestra Powell, my sister Cheryl P. Powell, and brother Gregory A. Powell. I thank them collectively and individually for their love, encouragement, and support. I will always be indebted to my friends for their friendship and encouragement, and with special thanks to Wanda A. Hendricks and Angelo D. Robinson. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my chair, Manisha Sinha for her invaluable time and support of this project. I am also indebted to the other members of my Committee, John H. Bracey, William L. Strickland, and Susan J. Tracy for their advice and guidance. I would also like to thank the librarians and staffs at the University of Massachusetts- Amherst, William and Mary College, and The Huntington Library. ABSTRACT "WHAT'S LOVE GOT TO DO WITH IT? : THE DYNAMICS OF DESIRE, RACE AND MURDER IN THE SLAVE SOUTH FEBRUARY 2002 CAROLYN J. POWELL, B.A., HUNTER COLLEGE OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK M.A., NEW YORK UNIVERSITY M.A., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST PH.D., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Directed by: Professor Manisha Sinha This dissertation examines the sexual dimensions of miscegenation and the effect that it had on the lives of three slave women, their children, and their white slave masters. Chapter 1 explores the historical dynamic concerning the issue of cross-racial relationships in the slave South. Chapter 2 will examine the black female experience under slavery and the dynamics that helped to shape their lives including the issues of race, class and gender. Although these we are well aware of the exploitation of slave women, we will also examine how women used "agency" to resist and to control their day-to-day lives. which continue Chapter 3 revisits the lives of Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings, revelation of the study to ignite questions concerning their relationship, despite the DNA not as a politician, but as a man published in 1998. We will explore Jefferson's behavior, vi confronted with issues and choices, as most men are, particularly when the choices concern affairs of the heart. Chapter 4 concerns the dynamics of love, miscegenation, and murder in the lives of George Wythe, Lydia Broadnax, his freed slave woman, and Michael Brown, Lydia's his closest mulatto son. Equally as important is the relationship between Wythe and question how much Wythe friend and confidant, Thomas Jefferson, which causes us to with Sally Hemings. really knew about Jefferson's personal life, particularly President under Martin Chapter 5 explores the lives of Richard Mentor Johnson, Vice Imogene and Adalaine. By all Van Buren, his slave Julia Chinn and their two daughters, openly with Julia, his slave, and standards, their relationship was unusual. Richard lived customs and laws. their children in defiance of the Souths social significance of resistance in the lives Chapter 6 will conclude with a look back at the private helped to shape relationships that of slave women and how the issue of public vs. will show how America historically looked at crossed the color line in the slave South. It to be a line and cross-racial relationships continue race and sexuality, and why the color problem in the twenty-first century. CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS V ABSTRACT VI CHAPTER RELATIONSHIPS I. THE HISTORICAL DYNAMICS OF CROSS RACIAL IN THE SLAVE SOUTH 1 11 II. A VIEW FROM THE FEMALE SLAVE SOUTH 41 III. JEFFERSON AND HEMINGS: AN INTIMATE STORY 89 IV. AND JUSTICE FOR ALL...? HIS V. "LOVE AKIN TO FREEDOM". ?: A VICE PRESIDENT AND SLAVE WOMEN 143 196 VI. CONCLUSION BIBLIOGRAPHY 200 viii CHAPTER I THE HISTORICAL DYNAMICS OF CROSS RACIAL RELATIONSHIPS IN THE SLAVE SOUTH Over the past twenty years, historians have explored the sexual dimensions of miscegenation and the effect that it had on slave women in the American South.' These scholars have examined the colonial as well as the antebellum periods covering the sexual abuse of slave women, sexual stereotyping, relationships between black men and white women, and mulatto children. Although historians of Southern history have enhanced our understanding of the sexual dynamics of slavery, a significant role for new research can explore the psychosexual dynamic across the color line from an historical perspective, as well as how it impacts issues of race, class, and gender today. Cross-racial relationships under slavery exposed a humanity that was deeply embedded in the institution of slavery. The Declaration of Independence, as written by its chief architect, Thomas Jefferson, was the foundation of the new republic. This document promised a new nation in which all men are created equal and endowed by their Creator with inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Unfortunately, that was not to be. Men like Washington, Jefferson, Monroe and a host of other men this country has held in high esteem were slaveholders. Each denied black men and women their right to their inalienable rights that were guaranteed to whites. Despite the fact that some of our See the following books by these historians, Catherine Clinton, The Plantation Books, 1 Martha Mistress: Woman's World in the Old South (New York: Pantheon 982); Illicit Sex in the Nineteenth-Century South (New Hndes . White Women. Black Men: Haven: Yale University Press, 1997); and Deborah Gray White, Ar'n't I a Woman? Female Company, 1985). Slaves in the Plantation South (New York: W.W. Norton & 1 Founding Fathers were uncomfortable with the reality of slavery, they were active participants in helping to sustain its existence for nearly three hundred years. This kind of hypocrisy was not unique to the colony of Virginia but was pervasive throughout the slave 2 South. Historians have made considerable headway in advancing the issue of race in America but not always the issue of sex. We as men and women, black and white are still topic is even more hesitant about sexuality and its rightful place in our history. This affection between the races. forbidding when sex is coupled with love, intimacy and "Academics rarely flock According to historians Catherine Clinton and Michele Gillispie, into the most intimate and to taboo topics. Explorations of sexuality require delving locate and evidence tricky to exploitable personal relationships, with sources difficult to complex dynamics at play are required. interpret. Subtle and substantial recastings of the 3 overdue." This research. .is long occurred between white Some of the studies on miscegenous relationships that question that any relationship existed between slave masters and slave women call into scientific community and their work in the area these men and women. But thanks to the high degree of accuracy, the paternity of DNA, we can now answer and isolate, with a 2 slavery, see Edmund S. look at this dilemma concerning For an insightful (New Morgan, AinericmSlayery AmericanJ^ree^^ 4-6. York- W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1975), in 3 eds., The_Dgyjrs T ane: Sex and Race Catherine Clinton and Michele Gillespie For a University Press, 1 997), xiu.-xiv. the Farlv South (New York: Oxford John *££2?£S on the history of sexuality see (New^^^^York: Harper & Row, JntiniteJVd^^ Publishers, 1988). 2 seems like an eternity, as in questions that have loomed over America's history for what The headway that has been made in the the case of Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings. we as men and women, black and area of DNA research will forever revolutionize how only within the color line but across the white, seek to deal with race and sexuality, not relationship has laid the foundation for this color line as well. The Jefferson and Hemings perspective of how to deal with race project, which, in turn, has opened up a whole new beyond. and sex in the twenty-first century and historians have avoided looking beyond the With this in mind, I will argue that with issues of race and sex forces us to question obvious in our history, because dealing into what becomes history. Many historians our own beliefs, which can then translate miscegenous behavior of white slave masters; have delineated, evaluated, and analyzed the dynamics of paid to the economic, social, and political less attention, however, has been they were to survive-in spite of the fact that these relationships and how they managed but also the political masters possessed not only the money both illegal and taboo.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Election Division Presidential Electors Faqs and Roster of Electors, 1816
    Election Division Presidential Electors FAQ Q1: How many presidential electors does Indiana have? What determines this number? Indiana currently has 11 presidential electors. Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States provides that each state shall appoint a number of electors equal to the number of Senators or Representatives to which the state is entitled in Congress. Since Indiana has currently has 9 U.S. Representatives and 2 U.S. Senators, the state is entitled to 11 electors. Q2: What are the requirements to serve as a presidential elector in Indiana? The requirements are set forth in the Constitution of the United States. Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2 provides that "no Senator or Representative, or person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector." Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment also states that "No person shall be... elector of President or Vice-President... who, having previously taken an oath... to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. Congress may be a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability." These requirements are included in state law at Indiana Code 3-8-1-6(b). Q3: How does a person become a candidate to be chosen as a presidential elector in Indiana? Three political parties (Democratic, Libertarian, and Republican) have their presidential and vice- presidential candidates placed on Indiana ballots after their party's national convention.
    [Show full text]
  • LEQ: Which President Served in Office for Only One Month?
    LEQ: Which President served in office for only one month? William Henry Harrison on his deathbed with Reverend Hawley to Harrison’s left, a niece to Harrison’s right, a nephew to the right of the niece, a physician standing with his arms folded, Secretary of State Daniel Webster with his right hand raised, and Thomas Ewing, Secretary of the Treasury sitting with a handkerchief over his face. Postmaster General Francis Granger is standing by the right door. This image was created by Nathaniel Currier circa 1841. It is titled “Death of Harrison, April 4 A.D. 1841.” This is a later, hand colored version of that image. LEQ: Which President served in office for only one month? William Henry Harrison William Henry Harrison on his deathbed with Reverend Hawley to Harrison’s left, a niece to Harrison’s right, a nephew to the right of the niece, a physician standing with his arms folded, Secretary of State Daniel Webster with his right hand raised, and Thomas Ewing, Secretary of the Treasury sitting with a handkerchief over his face. Postmaster General Francis Granger is standing by the right door. This image was created by Nathaniel Currier circa 1841. It is titled “Death of Harrison, April 4 A.D. 1841.” This is a later, hand colored version of that image. The Age of Jackson Ends Andrew Jackson (1767-1845) was said to have physically suffered at one time or another from the following: chronic headaches, abdominal pains, and a cough caused by a musket ball in his lung that was never removed.
    [Show full text]
  • Signers of the United States Declaration of Independence Table of Contents
    SIGNERS OF THE UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE 56 Men Who Risked It All Life, Family, Fortune, Health, Future Compiled by Bob Hampton First Edition - 2014 1 SIGNERS OF THE UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTON Page Table of Contents………………………………………………………………...………………2 Overview………………………………………………………………………………...………..5 Painting by John Trumbull……………………………………………………………………...7 Summary of Aftermath……………………………………………….………………...……….8 Independence Day Quiz…………………………………………………….……...………...…11 NEW HAMPSHIRE Josiah Bartlett………………………………………………………………………………..…12 William Whipple..........................................................................................................................15 Matthew Thornton……………………………………………………………………...…........18 MASSACHUSETTS Samuel Adams………………………………………………………………………………..…21 John Adams………………………………………………………………………………..……25 John Hancock………………………………………………………………………………..….29 Robert Treat Paine………………………………………………………………………….….32 Elbridge Gerry……………………………………………………………………....…….……35 RHODE ISLAND Stephen Hopkins………………………………………………………………………….…….38 William Ellery……………………………………………………………………………….….41 CONNECTICUT Roger Sherman…………………………………………………………………………..……...45 Samuel Huntington…………………………………………………………………….……….48 William Williams……………………………………………………………………………….51 Oliver Wolcott…………………………………………………………………………….…….54 NEW YORK William Floyd………………………………………………………………………….………..57 Philip Livingston…………………………………………………………………………….….60 Francis Lewis…………………………………………………………………………....…..…..64 Lewis Morris………………………………………………………………………………….…67
    [Show full text]
  • 2001 Report of Gifts (133 Pages) South Caroliniana Library--University of South Carolina
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons University South Caroliniana Society - Annual South Caroliniana Library Report of Gifts 5-19-2001 2001 Report of Gifts (133 pages) South Caroliniana Library--University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/scs_anpgm Part of the Library and Information Science Commons, and the United States History Commons Publication Info 2001. University South Caroliniana Society. (2001). "2001 Report of Gifts." Columbia, SC: The ocS iety. This Newsletter is brought to you by the South Caroliniana Library at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in University South Caroliniana Society - Annual Report of Gifts yb an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The The South Carolina South Caroliniana College Library Library 1840 1940 THE UNIVERSITY SOUTH CAROLINIANA SOCIETY SIXTY-FIFTH ANNUAL MEETING UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA Saturday, May 19, 2001 Dr. Allen H. Stokes, Jr., Secretary-Treasurer, Presiding Reception and Exhibit . .. 11 :00 a.m. South Caroliniana Library Luncheon 1:00 p.m. Clarion Townhouse Hotel Business Meeting Welcome Reports of the Executive Council and Secretary-Treasurer Address . Genevieve Chandler Peterkin 2001 Report of Gifts to the Library by Members of the Society Announced at the 65th Annual Meeting of the University South Caroliniana Society (the Friends of the Library) Annual Program 19 May 2001 South Carolina's Pivotal Decision for Disunion: Popular Mandate or Manipulated Verdict? – 2000 Keynote Address by William W. Freehling Gifts of Manuscript South Caroliniana Gifts to Modern Political Collections Gifts of Pictorial South Caroliniana Gifts of Printed South Caroliniana South Caroliniana Library (Columbia, SC) A special collection documenting all periods of South Carolina history.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Maryland's Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016
    A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 Published by: Maryland State Board of Elections Linda H. Lamone, Administrator Project Coordinator: Jared DeMarinis, Director Division of Candidacy and Campaign Finance Published: October 2016 Table of Contents Preface 5 The Electoral College – Introduction 7 Meeting of February 4, 1789 19 Meeting of December 5, 1792 22 Meeting of December 7, 1796 24 Meeting of December 3, 1800 27 Meeting of December 5, 1804 30 Meeting of December 7, 1808 31 Meeting of December 2, 1812 33 Meeting of December 4, 1816 35 Meeting of December 6, 1820 36 Meeting of December 1, 1824 39 Meeting of December 3, 1828 41 Meeting of December 5, 1832 43 Meeting of December 7, 1836 46 Meeting of December 2, 1840 49 Meeting of December 4, 1844 52 Meeting of December 6, 1848 53 Meeting of December 1, 1852 55 Meeting of December 3, 1856 57 Meeting of December 5, 1860 60 Meeting of December 7, 1864 62 Meeting of December 2, 1868 65 Meeting of December 4, 1872 66 Meeting of December 6, 1876 68 Meeting of December 1, 1880 70 Meeting of December 3, 1884 71 Page | 2 Meeting of January 14, 1889 74 Meeting of January 9, 1893 75 Meeting of January 11, 1897 77 Meeting of January 14, 1901 79 Meeting of January 9, 1905 80 Meeting of January 11, 1909 83 Meeting of January 13, 1913 85 Meeting of January 8, 1917 87 Meeting of January 10, 1921 88 Meeting of January 12, 1925 90 Meeting of January 2, 1929 91 Meeting of January 4, 1933 93 Meeting of December 14, 1936
    [Show full text]
  • The Democratic Party and the Transformation of American Conservatism, 1847-1860
    PRESERVING THE WHITE MAN’S REPUBLIC: THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF AMERICAN CONSERVATISM, 1847-1860 Joshua A. Lynn A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2015 Approved by: Harry L. Watson William L. Barney Laura F. Edwards Joseph T. Glatthaar Michael Lienesch © 2015 Joshua A. Lynn ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Joshua A. Lynn: Preserving the White Man’s Republic: The Democratic Party and the Transformation of American Conservatism, 1847-1860 (Under the direction of Harry L. Watson) In the late 1840s and 1850s, the American Democratic party redefined itself as “conservative.” Yet Democrats’ preexisting dedication to majoritarian democracy, liberal individualism, and white supremacy had not changed. Democrats believed that “fanatical” reformers, who opposed slavery and advanced the rights of African Americans and women, imperiled the white man’s republic they had crafted in the early 1800s. There were no more abstract notions of freedom to boundlessly unfold; there was only the existing liberty of white men to conserve. Democrats therefore recast democracy, previously a progressive means to expand rights, as a way for local majorities to police racial and gender boundaries. In the process, they reinvigorated American conservatism by placing it on a foundation of majoritarian democracy. Empowering white men to democratically govern all other Americans, Democrats contended, would preserve their prerogatives. With the policy of “popular sovereignty,” for instance, Democrats left slavery’s expansion to territorial settlers’ democratic decision-making.
    [Show full text]
  • Jefferson's Failed Anti-Slavery Priviso of 1784 and the Nascence of Free Soil Constitutionalism
    MERKEL_FINAL 4/3/2008 9:41:47 AM Jefferson’s Failed Anti-Slavery Proviso of 1784 and the Nascence of Free Soil Constitutionalism William G. Merkel∗ ABSTRACT Despite his severe racism and inextricable personal commit- ments to slavery, Thomas Jefferson made profoundly significant con- tributions to the rise of anti-slavery constitutionalism. This Article examines the narrowly defeated anti-slavery plank in the Territorial Governance Act drafted by Jefferson and ratified by Congress in 1784. The provision would have prohibited slavery in all new states carved out of the western territories ceded to the national government estab- lished under the Articles of Confederation. The Act set out the prin- ciple that new states would be admitted to the Union on equal terms with existing members, and provided the blueprint for the Republi- can Guarantee Clause and prohibitions against titles of nobility in the United States Constitution of 1788. The defeated anti-slavery plank inspired the anti-slavery proviso successfully passed into law with the Northwest Ordinance of 1787. Unlike that Ordinance’s famous anti- slavery clause, Jefferson’s defeated provision would have applied south as well as north of the Ohio River. ∗ Associate Professor of Law, Washburn University; D. Phil., University of Ox- ford, (History); J.D., Columbia University. Thanks to Sarah Barringer Gordon, Thomas Grey, and Larry Kramer for insightful comment and critique at the Yale/Stanford Junior Faculty Forum in June 2006. The paper benefited greatly from probing questions by members of the University of Kansas and Washburn Law facul- ties at faculty lunches. Colin Bonwick, Richard Carwardine, Michael Dorf, Daniel W.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Documents and Settings\David Carlson\Desktop\SHA97
    1997 SHA Conference on Historical and Underwater SOCIETY FOR HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY Archaeology Corpus Christi, TX 1997 AWARDS OF MERIT January 8 - 12, 1997 to be presented to PILAR LUNA ERREGUERENA Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, Mexico Seaports, Ships, and Central Places TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION Abstracts TEXAS ARCHEOLOGICAL SOCIETY 1997 J.C. HARRINGTON MEDAL JAMES DEETZ University of Virginia Hosted by Texas A&M University Institute of Nautical Archaeology Ships of Discovery ABSTRACTS 1997 CONFERENCE STAFF Conference Chair and Program Coordinator............. David L. Carlson Terrestrial Program Chair .......................Shawn Bonath Carlson Underwater Program Chair ............................. Denise Lakey Registration Chair .............................. Frederick M. Hocker Society for Historical Archaeology Local Arrangements Chair............................... Toni Carrell Volunteer Coordinator.................................Becky Jobling Tours Coordinator .....................................Mary Caruso 30th Conference on Historical and Book Room Coordinator .......................... Lawrence E. Babits Underwater Archaeology Employment Coordinator............................... Sarah Mascia Conference Coordinator................................. Tim Riordan Hosted by: Texas A&M University Institute of Nautical Archaeology Ships of Discovery January 8-12, 1997 Omni Bayfront Hotel Corpus Christi, Texas With financial support provided by: Corpus Christi Omni Bayfront Hotel Corpus Christi Area Convention &
    [Show full text]
  • The Slaves' Stories
    The Slaves’ Stories Biographical Sketches of the Slaves Portrayed in I Ain’t No Three Fifths of a Person William “Billy” Lee George Washington purchased William Lee (also known as Billy or Will) in 1768. Through primary source research, we believe Billy was at least 16 years old at the time. Early records refer to him as Washington’s “huntsman” which means that he would have accompanied Washington on foxhunts and most likely helped manage his hounds. Washington was considered the best horseman in Virginia and several accounts reflect on Billy’s skill as well. Billy eventually became Washington’s body servant or valet d’chambre. This position kept him by Washington’s side throughout the day and responsible for a number of duties including laying out clothes, helping Washington dress, serving meals as needed, delivering personal correspondence as well as a variety of other tasks. Lee was with General Washington throughout the eight years of the Revolutionary War. Revolutionary War veterans visiting Mount Vernon after the war often stopped to talk with Billy: By all accounts, he enjoyed reminiscing about battles, encampments, and the camaraderie of army life. Billy was with Washington throughout the Constitutional Convention; however, disability kept him from serving President Washington. Several years earlier, Billy broke his kneecap while on a surveying trip with Washington. He broke his second kneecap during an errand to the post office in Alexandria. Despite his disabilities, he was determined to travel to New York for the inauguration. Washington paid to send him; however, Billy fell ill in Philadelphia and was cared for by friends of the Washingtons until he was well enough to travel.
    [Show full text]
  • Forging a Bluegrass Commonwealth: the Kentucky Statehood Movement and the Politics of the Trans-Appalachian West, 1783–1792 Christopher L
    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Theses, Dissertations and Capstones 2017 Forging a Bluegrass Commonwealth: The Kentucky Statehood Movement and the Politics of the Trans-Appalachian West, 1783–1792 Christopher L. Leadingham [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://mds.marshall.edu/etd Part of the Appalachian Studies Commons, Political History Commons, Social History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Leadingham, Christopher L., "Forging a Bluegrass Commonwealth: The Kentucky Statehood Movement and the Politics of the Trans- Appalachian West, 1783–1792" (2017). Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. 1110. https://mds.marshall.edu/etd/1110 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. FORGING A BLUEGRASS COMMONWEALTH: THE KENTUCKY STATEHOOD MOVEMENT AND THE POLITICS OF THE TRANS-APPALACHIAN WEST, 1783–1792 A thesis submitted to the Graduate College of Marshall University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In History by Christopher L. Leadingham Approved by Dr. Kevin T. Barksdale, Committee Chairperson Dr. David J. Trowbridge Dr. Robert C. Deal Marshall University July 2017 APPROVAL OF THESIS We, the faculty supervising the work of Christopher L. Leadingham, affirm that the thesis, Forging a Bluegrass Commonwealth: The Kentucky Statehood Movement and the Politics of the Trans-Appalachian West, 1783–1792, meets the high academic standards for original scholarship and creative work established by the Master of Arts in History and the College of Liberal Arts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jefferson-Hemings Controversy Report of the Scholars Commission
    turner 00 fmt auto cx 3 3/17/11 10:54 AM Page iii The Jefferson-Hemings Controversy Report of the Scholars Commission Edited by Robert F. Turner Carolina Academic Press Durham, North Carolina turner 00 fmt auto cx 3 4/15/11 5:36 AM Page iv Copyright © 2001, 2011 Robert F. Turner All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Scholars Commission on the Jefferson-Hemings Matter. The Jefferson-Hemings controversy : report of the Scholars Commission / edited by Robert F. Turner. p. cm. ISBN 978-0-89089-085-1 (alk. paper) 1. Jefferson, Thomas, 1743–1826--Relations with women. 2. Hemings, Sally. 3. Jef- ferson, Thomas, 1743–1826--Relations with slaves. 4. Jefferson, Thomas, 1743–1826-- Family. I. Turner, Robert F. II. Title. E332.2.S35 2010 973.4'6092--dc22 2010031551 Carolina Academic Press 700 Kent Street Durham, NC 27701 Telephone (919) 489-7486 Fax (919) 493-5668 www.cap-press.com Printed in the United States of America turner 00 fmt auto cx 3 3/17/11 10:54 AM Page v This book is dedicated to the memory of our beloved colleagues Professor Lance Banning Hallam Professor of History University of Kentucky (January 24, 1942–January 31, 2006) and Professor Alf J. Mapp, Jr. Eminent Scholar, Emeritus and Louis I. Jaffe Professor of History, Emeritus Old Dominion University (February 17, 1925–January 23, 2011) turner 00 fmt auto cx 3 3/17/11 10:54 AM Page vii Contents Preface xiii Acknowledgments xv Members of the Scholars Commission xvii Scholars Commission on The Jefferson-Hemings Matter, Report 12 April 2001 3 Summary
    [Show full text]
  • THE Nicrloi.J,S FAMILY of VIRGINIA, 1722-1820 Victor Dennis Golladay
    THE NICrlOI.J,S FAMILY OF VIRGINIA, 1722-1820 Victor Dennis Golladay Waynesboro, Virginia B.S., Madison College, l�b3 M.A., University of Virginia, 1�69 A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Corcoran Department of History University of Virginia June, 1973 ABSTRACT During the late colonial, revolutionary, and early national periods of Virginia history, the Nicholas family furnished the state and the new nation with leaders on all political levels. For example, Robert Carter Nicholas of Williamsburg held the high post of Treasurer of Virginia from 1766 to 1776, while his sons served in posts in three states -- Virginia, Kentucky, and New York -- and in the new national government as spokesmen for the Jeffersonian Republicans. Yet, after 1820 the Nicholases provided very few leaders of note, and any influence formerly held by the family died. The rise and fall of the Nicholas family provides an interesting insight into the social patterns of' Virginia's elite. In 1722, the founder of the family, George Nicholas of Manston, Dorset, was trans­ ported to Virginia for life in lieu of being hanged for forgery and counterfeiting. Despite his disgrace, George Nicholas quickly carved a place among Virginia's social elite. Using his English gentry back­ ground, Cambridge education, and slight medical training to maximum advantage, he styled himself a physician, married the eldest daughter of Virginia's wealthiest planter, acquired large tracts of Piedmont land, and ultimately served in the House of Burgesses as the representative of the College of William and Mary.
    [Show full text]