Report on Fundamental Investigation in Fiscal 2000 of Intellectual Property
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
35 2ft US $#00-01 iff x^u^ — urn a NEED Za 010017479- 6 ¥*l3^3i! 103* 200 1^4J! At.lt, ®ilTEci£A*#SfiH'&0F?EB)f/l5\ Sffittti'ol eku:tt lxmtiL$t= Lrflg#5Arv>i1"o A£>A(±, K»##^@kATmg»g#t'kOx 4a, sf$8 S8SJ fib cd A A<om##'%#§KM<7)%#7)WK * p$ai±, intoMStroeatrgfflcifii:A-E.V-1KML, art !±EjtLrHEtoAaife*$i6, e^SSitroSjlCinjitrciXE'M-^t-S L L SrgMi: LS LA. SaftISS# 00-01 m Iff < M0;£A h i Hif 21 1ftS5®xX- x□ > at 7®SiJS • ffiAeBfg LT, ft*¥frffia®ft«?>®«lH8MfteWli?S. ##MT##ft# %®i*se. s 6ict$ffi$Es-5:x5ttto$$®B(ieAt#ii5nT®$f. 2001 ¥ 4 flA-btt. 3$iLffRftAEES«E-^E%Flf7)7 t4sai*TF®iK»l; t)HfB®E%StiSIW?>*Stoe%tiMA UTte«)L$T, Stltjto^oH# to»W%»i*®4=T, i|5El>^iflC$fc7)t5E%M%$SM7-5£:Sn, E*##ft#e A# • SHf-Stt* ftE?EJ$$e4Auti¥ik® ARHSSiftT® $¥ = f fl)*l3®@% is a t; o * if-s fc * c a. a w w e ft ® s <s * ® t#t ® i= a *i a x ■ s * s * t fj: o , $fc, SfSE^Silttl® AA®E#SS#6EP1®?cll7)iffS£:SflT® $7. A®?. *asTtt, a*;fEft®#a6am®m#6%6#iMi:ML, shah-tc® D-Sico®TfcEMAS.seWT5**iieMf )E%Sesfflre$, 6 ®ttzR«VTiaB69 ftiiiaes®. *@Mftame##L, E#ft**#Aw%mr®E#@a#®#mi:KnftT ®*#*#A¥6TA&BMALT. A® A £> ftlfflSeff ® $ LAc. 1. A¥lc*5tf.g>W®®W3ME®$(9K® 2. E#@#e$x6g#®& 0 J-7ffa-t y ft I# A#® L < A 3. f > FftfsttAftf-feAXAftf-fiSie 4. 21 #K®%MBfEft®a& 5. fiiMME®®^—*Ht#Ifri®SfftftiiffitMaUT 6. 3 >Ha.-X-Hill$HJ3®SS*VTT®T® B*tLKE% 7. ft»¥frB#A®»Bf • ¥=6r£B—IT • /Hfff / □ ft-MilkftT h;i/®*« 8. Wf AA'f A%0H—iiBAWlEMISSgStJlciEB LT 9 . A'f ATX/ nft-#*®#rftftme y,±e, g*cf5tf^-ftEtofaMifEfteacefflftsfttirofss alt$u/t„ *«s«7)$, E#R#m&m%m®aM;.fEft#a®%8T&mgfi6®»ft a #^m®wfE«Mi=joif&m##ef#:f#a®&r)Ae#x3±T&. *@aft6*# AftD, %MMTEft®##em. E¥Sa#®#mc^Aft 9 AfeWftT-5 AT¥¥'i6h If, 5Bk£ UTfcASftSSft A-5 £S5T8 0 Jt. T®aeisic#Aftr'BA • r'ftsesA o $ lah»#ei:$< @M®*e$ T5A$T$> 0 $¥, ¥tit 13 ¥ 3 fl iffflffiAB*EMtft«JgSSB£ Aft & li A A O #3# ' 1### EE# y 9 — • totoifltii «S ® IE arosmta^sm • %# Martin J. Adelman Professor of Law and Director, Intellectual Property Law Program, George Washington University La School. Sonia Baldia S.J.D., Dinwoodey Center for Intellectual Property Studies, George Washington University Law School. Q. Todd Dickinson Former Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property & Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Sachi Hatakenaka Doctoral Candidate, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Roland L. Hjorth Dean, University of Washington, School of Law. Huan-Yi Lin S.J.D. Candidate, George Washington University Law School. Niels Reimers Director Emeritus, Stanford University Office of Technology Licensing. Andrea G. Reister Counsel, Covington & Burling. Toshiko Takenaka Associate Professor and Director of the Center for Advanced Study and Research on Intellectual Property, University of Washington, School of Law. Li Westerlund S.J.D., Stockholm University Law School. Scholar, George Washington University Law School Dean Alderucci Chief Counsel, Intellectual Property, Walker Digital Corporation. David Carlson Partner, Seed IP Law Group. Sonya Erickson Director, Venture Law Group. Eliab S. Erukar Associate, Cooley Goodward LLP. Judith Ann Hasko Partner, Cooley Goodward LLP. David Maki Vice President, Trandegar Investments of Counsel, Seed IP Law Group. Chun Ng Partner, Brakely, Sokoloff, Taylor & Zaffman. # #- SE1WSSE fflSft E Mllfi A B Sft Mffl?iAB*eHt$«S#toS HISW%t8ABE EE T 105-0001 ITS 19# 5 9 TEL : 03-3591-6202 FAX : 03-3592-1368 E-mail : [email protected] B * ..................................................................................................................... i ................................................................................................................. V mi# .................................. 1 ^2# g#^#^$$X_6m^(D^0^:MIT(DL/<^............... 14 ms# <> M cio ^ < t >x ................................... 23 %%4# 21 #E(D^069Mjg#(D#m.................................................... 31 ms# .......... 47 63 m?# ................ 73 1 9S/>h>±#(D^............................................................. 73 2 ................ 74 75 4 ^ >7 ..................................................... 76 5 ............................... 78 6 ............................................................. 79 7 ......... 80 8 ............................................................. 81 9 ........................ 82 #8# #:f (h/W l/T— " " 85 m9# ;w^7^y ................................... 91 mio# ...................................................................................... 100 Abstract of the research This report was made for promotion of cooperation among industry, academia, and government centering on the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology. The Chapter 1, “Tangible Research Property in the 21st Century from the viewpoint of Universities” was written by Mr. Niels Reimers, Director Emeritus of Stanford University Office of Technology Licensing. When one considers the term “intellectual property ”, what first comes to mind are the intellectual property rights of patents and copyrights. Here the rapidly growing area of licensing by universities of what is being called Tangible Research Property is described. The Chapter 2, “Supporting Organizations of Industrial-Academia Cooperation- Mechanisms of MIT” was written by Dr. Sachi Hatakenaka, who majors management in the MIT. It is shown that various forms of industrial-academia cooperation, not only licensing but also Industrial Liaison Program, consortium, individual research supporting projects, and so on. In MIT, researchers are always asked what is an actual impact of their research. The Chapter 3, “Licensing and Technology Transfer in India” was written by Dr. Sonia Baldia, research associate of George Washington University Law School. Beginning in 1991, India substantially liberalized its regulatory regime by making watershed reforms to its industrial policy and making the investment climate more conductive to foreign investment and technology transfer. The Chapter 4, “Intellectual Property Trends for the 21st Century: The Road Ahead” was written by Mr. Q. Todd Dickinson, Former Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property & Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. In this review he mentioned the White Paper on so-called “patent pooling ” to analyze whether this traditional means of dealing with patent layering might be appropriately applied in biotechnology. The Chapter 5, “Managing Intellectual Property Assets and Current Trends in U.S. Patent Law” was written by Ms. Andrea Reister, Attorney at Covington & Bruling. By developing and maintaining the IP matrix in the manner described here, it is possible to identify what technology and intellectual property assets are needed for a project, and to make an assessment of “build v. buy ” for the technology. The Chapter 6, “Comparative Study of Examination Guidelines for Computer-Related Inventions between United States and Japan ” was written by Mr. Huan Yi Lin, S.J.D. candidate of George Washington University Law School. This chapter compares criteria for patent eligibility and non obviousness of computer-related inventions. i The Chapter 7 is based on a series of hearings from lawyers in Seattle, where biotech industry and IT companies are very active. Two professors from University of Washington, Prof. Roland Hjorth, dean of School of Law, and Prof. Toshiko Takenaka, director of the Center for Advanced Study and Research on Intellectual Property (CASRIP), mentioned new programs of intellectual property or business law aiming at providing high-tech industries with the specialists of high-tech related laws. The Chapter 8, “Patents and Biotech Inventions • the Law and R&D Contracts ” was written by Dr. Li Westerlund, Stockholm University and George Washington University. In today ’s business environment, R&D contracts is often vital for commercial success of, for instance, pharmaceutical companies. The Chapter 9, “A Nobel Trend of Biotechnology Patents” is based on a lecture Prof. Adelman made in the symposium held by JITA and RCAST on March 22. He argued based on the decision of “Amgen, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. and Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc., Defendants.” in United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on January 19, 2001. The Chapter 10 summarizes the whole report and makes suggestions to utilize this knowledge to IP management in the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology or other public institutions. n USE A1"S A A £ B to A L T& £ flit amtcMf st)©x&s. BlSTIi. A^tc*IfZftBCDfJfftgiM (TRP) ©mD#©A#C6tiA. B*lcj3tt-5tt $se®K*ttc:n$T-H, t>x#4-&R3 AndXx-XcS'd'ixitt)©©*!.- 7)Vj:£nT£&7)>-bfc/»i, i.5©i/j>l£*>^'A(::iot, TRP SMfctBxT<S/£’S3. B 2 ST’tt, E#aW5rSx«.fi^®*D^fCQ®T, ?tfa-tryis*f (MIT) © MJSMlLifco 5'f-k>x>X'/£WcA A$-Sf\ -f >X'X h U 7)1/ • Uxv'X-v’nifxA (ILP), 3>V-->7A, flSSiMJEASVn'Xi^ h&A. fils &l/^)l/T©S»a#^'fftofl T©SC AA%£flT©S. E^StoflcttoMAUT. ^©E^^mBM-TX/^X HIM egicMtfiaj;g^mmemscxt>e$T&s 5. B 3 Ski, j£±EK©ft«#e©WiJAUT, •T>K£®0±tffc, ftAUTWETSO, A#V»&%#M^bABAA%m&7<tXXf S AA(:A3X##BI© E*58S^7'f-b>X7C /\©iKSfi7C©SS7)tSt$SSn-$,tr-X»i^4 85^d3. U^V, < 0, *fm©##&j:<mxx^bmmt:#£%©A. f©m©&#):mML/:R&eLTL* B4Stt. ASWIWIDt (USPTO) Hft'gCckS, »6<)lI"Et8©»EII)l=]Kx>©T© 1/Hx -X&So £©'PTffiBBx#(i, ffil4I*lf©f±*© —3Ti6oft rz-ixX hx°-)l/6#j ^ ©fftt'^5. /tx> hx'-jl/tt. #&©&# ):* L T'E'#©##f & #%©### AA ’gsmmzmt&ft*>ii 0, -etowatnw-en^ vt7-r a >xbs u < »x$> So cnjftt, MPEG-2, DVD. IEEE 1394 A Assam. X XX h nxX XMa©#fFtCW LT/tx> hX-^/WbnT©S. ATxA^XVXKAtfflSUT^Stott. XXL fcG<©.£ffllxT«efl!!aMT£-ftbT7''f-fe>Xf -5 A AT&S. XtlH, USPTO tfZ a*xmefMa©#:m#&*AL*M-T@^cA/\©mMi:*7sia@:At An.st)©x& So B 5 SCti.