Bulletin of the Museum and Institute of Zoology PAS, supplement to Annales Zoologici Warszawa 1999, No 2: 45-62

The Type Material of Pseudophyllidae () in the Museum and Institute of Zoology PAS, Warsaw

A n n a L ia n a

Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii PAN, ul. Wilcza 64, 00-679 Warszawa, Polska

Abstract. A list of the 233 type specimens belonging to the 141 species of the family Pseudophyllidae (Orthoptera ) which are preserved in the Museum and Institute of Zoology PAS in Warszawa is given, of these 55 are holotypes, 30 - paratypes, 141 - syntypes, 5 lectotypes and 2 - paralectotypes. A paralectotype for Pantecphylus cerambycinus KARSCH is recognized.

Key words. Orthoptera, Pseudophyllidae, type specimens.

I ntroduction Zoology PAS. These specimens have red labels bearing the inscription “Type” and determination The family Pseudophyllidae, one of the most labels of M. B E IE R but there are no determination attractive among the orthopterans, in the collection of labels of H. D o h r n . the Museum and Institute of Zoology PAS is repre­ In 1895, C. Brunner von W attenw yl published sented by 324 species, and by 994 identified speci­ the first monograph on the Pseudophyllidae that mens and some unidentified ones. The majority of the contained descriptions of 273 new species, including Pseudophyllidae material comes from the so-called those of 66 species based on material from the D o h r n D o h r n ’ s collection (once stored at the Museum in collection. C. BRUNNER never designated holotypes, Szczecin). Most of specimens were identified at the he never gave the number of specimens studied. end of the 19th century by C. BRUNNER von However, he cited all collections possessing speci­ W a t t e n w y l and the rest by H. D o h r n , F. K a r s c h mens of a new species after its description, measure­ and G. E nderlein. At the beginning of the 1940s, this ments and sites of collecting. Therefore all specimens material was studied by Max B e i e r . The type speci­ cited by him should be treated as “syntypes”. mens belong to the species described mainly by the Some data considered a terra typica in B r u n n e r ’ s above mentioned authors. descriptions are partially discordant with data on the On the turn of the 19th century, Dr. Heinrich labels, generally the contents of the labels is shorter. D o h r n , a well-known entomologist from the Museum For example, a single known specimen of Acauloplax in Szczecin, collected material in different regions of asiatica is labelled “Minahassa”, while C. BRUNNER the world, mainly in Australasia, Indonesia and South von W attenwyl cited “Minahassa in insula Cele­ America. He elaborated a part of this material, includ­ bes”. ing some orthopterans. In 1888, he described some B r u n n e r ’ s type specimens are labelled “Type” in species of Pseudophyllidae, including five from his red or “Co=Typus” in yellow. M. B e i e r designated own collection. The type specimens of these species types among some of B r u n n e r ’ s type specimens but are in the collection of the Museum and Institute of only some of these can be considered as lectotypes.

http://rcin.org.pl 46 • A. Liana

In 1917, Gunther E n d e r le i n described three ner von W attenwyl’ s species from other collec­ species of Pseudophyllidae from the DOHRN collec­ tions. For example, Bliastes viridifolius was described tion. All the type specimens carry E n d e r l e i n ’s by Brunner von W attenwyl on the basis of speci­ determination labels with the inscription “Type” and mens from the collections in Szczecin and in Vienna. red labels with “Type”. They should be treated as One of the two female type specimens in our collec­ syntypes (specimens of Mimeticapehlkei) or lectotype tion has B e ie r ’s determination label with “Type!”, the and paratype (specimens of Tanusiella guttifera, by other with “Paratype!” but neither was cited as a type designation of M. B e ie r ) or holotype ( Typophyllum specimen in B e i e r ’s monograph from 1960. He must lacinipennis described from a single specimen). have taken into consideration only the specimen from Max B e ie r worked on the collection of Vienna. Pseudophyllidae in Szczecin at the beginning of 1940s The list of type specimens given below has a (during World War II). On the basis of this material he similar structure to that published earlier in the Bulle­ later described 44 species between 1944 and 1962. As tin. The species are listed in alphabetical order by the a rule, the type specimens have Beier’s determination original genus and species. After information about labels with information according to the sex of a given the status of a given type specimen, its sex and the specimen and to the status of a type (type=holotype, number in our type base, the contents of all labels is allotype, paratype). Type specimens also carry red given. For example, Amazonas viridifolia x Brunn labels with “Type”. means: Amazonas - locality; viridifolia - species Probably after 1944, M. Beier had no occasion to name, x mark of type specimen, Brunn - abbreviation see the types he himself designated from the material of the name B r u n n e r v o n W a t t e n w y l . Then in Szczecin. This resulted in some errors in the de­ follows information about the condition of the speci­ scriptions of species (incorrect label numbers, im­ men (if it is damaged). In some cases information proper sex in one case, etc.). about nomenclatorial changes is also given as “Re­ In our collection there is one specimen of a never marks”. described species Parapleminia fruhstorferi carrying All type specimens also carry the museum registra­ B e ie r ’s determination label with a new name and a tion labels of two kinds: one (red) with the number of red label with “Type”. A similar case is with the the type, the other (white) with a printed note “Mus. subspecies Cocconotus adustus granatus never Zool. Polonicum Warszawa 12/45”. described by B e ie r .

For some species at first M. B e ie r designated L i s t o f S p e c i m e n s specimens from the D o h r n collection as types (they have his determination labels with “Type!”). Many Acauloplacella (Papuarium) insularis B e ie r , 1954: years later, while describing these species M. BEIER 214-215, f. 123 changed his earlier decision and he took into consider­ PARATYPE female (No. 2162) with labels: “Key ation only specimens from collections other than Inseln”, “ Papuarium ng. Insulare n. sp. det. Beier DOHRN’s. Such was the case with Promeca brachy- Paratype! ptera, Panoploscelis specularis, P. scudderi, Schedo- centrus nigrescens, Sch. steinbachi our - specimens Acauloplax asiatica B r u n n e r v o n W a t t e n w y l , have B e i e r ’s determination labels with “Type! ” yet 1895: 81 they should not be considered types because he did not mention them in the original descriptions. LECTOTYPE male (No. 2163) with labels: About 90% of the specimens of Pseudophyllidae in “Minahassa”, “asiatica x Brunn”, “Papuarium our collection have B e i e r ’s determination labels, very asiaticum Br. W. Type det. Beier cf”. often with “Type!”. Nearly all types of Brunner von Remarks. Species described probably on the basis of W a t t e n w y l carry this sort of labels and notes (with a single specimen but B r u n n e r v o n W a t t e n w y l the exception of specimens whose determination was did not note this clearly. B e ie r (1962) designated changed by BEIER). This is often inconsistent with only a specimen mentioned above as the type B e ie r ’s later decision to designate the types of B r u n ­ (= lectotype).

http://rcin.org.pl Type material of Pseudophyllidae • 47

Adapantus longipennis BEIER, 1954: 356 “Co=Typus” [a yellow label], “Type” [a red label], “Ancistrocercus vicinus n. sp. Type! 9 det. Beier”; HOLOTYPE male (No. 2164) with labels: “Kamerun the specimen lacks its tarsus and tibia of the right Kribi 08 Lamey S.”, “354”, “Type” [a red label], fore leg, the left antenna and most of the right “Adapantus longipennis n. sp. Type det. Beier a"”. antenna. Remarks. This specimen is also the syntype of Gongrocnemis pallidespinosa BRUNNER VON Adenes obesus K arsch, 1891b: 113, f. 18 W a t t e n w y l , 1895 (vide later). SYNTYPE male (No. 2165) with labels: “Elmina”,

“Type” [a red label], “Adenus obesus Karsch

http://rcin.org.pl 48 • A. Liana

Aprion robustus B r u n n e r VON W a t t e n w y l , 1895: Remarks. This species was described only on the basis 76 of a material from the DOHRN collection, but the number of type specimens is not clear. B eie r SYNTYPE male (No. 2176) with labels: “Ceylon”, (1960) designated the female mentioned above as “Co-Typus“ [a yellow label], “Ceylon robustus x the type (= lectotype). Brunn.“, “Heteraprium carinatum Walk. det. Beier cf“ . Bliastes viridifolius BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, SYNTYPE male (No. 2177) with labels: “Ceylon”, 1895:191 “Co-Typus“ [a yellow label], “Heterapriumcarina­ tum Walk. det. Beier

Bliastes acuminatus B r u n n e r v o n W a t t e n w y l , “Amazonas”,44Co=Typus” [a yellow label], 1895: 193 “Drepanoxiphus viridifolius Br. W. det. Beier ? Paratype!”. SYNTYPE female (No. 2179) with labels: Remarks. The species was based on a material from “Cumbasi“, “Type“ [a red label], “Cranotus the collections in Vienna and in Szczecin. B eie r acuminatus (Br. W.) Type ? det. Beier“. (1960) noted only female from the B r u n n e r collection in Vienna as the type. Bliastes connexus Brunner von W attenw yl, 1895: 192 Brunnea cincticollis B r u n n e r VON W a t t e n w y l , SYNTYPES male (No. 2180) and female (No. 2181) 1895:45 with labels: “Ucayali“, “Co=Typus“ [a yellow SYNTYPE male (No. 2189) with labels: “Dohrn label], “Cocconotus connexus Br. cT [or] ? det. Sumatra Soekaranda”, “Co=Typus” [a yellow Beier“. label], “Brunnea cincticollis Dr. H. Dohrn determ.”, “Brunnea cincticollis Br. W. cf det. Bliastes laevifrons B r u n n e r v o n W a t t e n w y l , Beier”. 1895: 187-188, f. 84 SYNTYPE female (No. 2190) with labels: “Soekaran­ SYNTYPE male (No. 2182) with labels: “Venezuela", da Januar 1894 Dohrn”, “Co=Typus” [a yellow “Venezuela laevifrons x Brunn“, “Co=Typus“ [a label], “Brunneacincticollis Dr. H. Dohrn determ”, yellow label], “Cocconotus laevifrons Br. W.

http://rcin.org.pl Type material of Pseudophyllidae • 49

“Type” [a red label], “marmoratus x Brunn”, “25”, Choeroparnops garleppi D o h r n , 1888: 359-361 “Acanthodiphrus conspersus Walk, det Beier SYNTYPE female (No. 2193) with label: “Chiriqui”, SYNTYPE male (No. 2200) with labels: “Peru”, “Co=Typus” [a red label], “26”, “Acanthodiphrus “Type” [a red label], “186”, “Choeroparnops conspersus Walk, det Beier garleppi Dohrn det. Beier Type! cf”; the specimen is damaged. SYNTYPE female (No. 2201) with labels: “Pern”, Championica (Auchenacophora) haenschi BEIER, “Type” [a red label], [specimen without the hind 1954: 296 legs and the fore tarsi]. SYNTYPE female juvenile (No. 2202) with labels: HOLOTYPE female (No. 2194) with labels: “Santa “Peru”, “Co=Typus” [a yellow label]; antennae are Inez (Ecuad.) R. Haensch”, “225”, “Orpacophora badly damaged. haenschi n. sp. Type! ¥ det. Beier”. There is also a common label before the type series: “Peru Garleppi Dohrn Hahnel”. Championica (Championica ) niepelti BEIER, 1954: 2 9 3 -2 9 4 Choeroparnopsplatythorax DOHRN, 1888: 360 HOLOTYPE female (No. 2195) with labels: “Ecuador HOLOTYPE female (No. 2203) with labels: “182”, Canelos Niepelt S.”, “228”, “Orpacophora niepelti “Cumbasi”, “Type” [a red label], “Choeroparnops n. sp. Type! ¥ det. Beier”; the type specimen is platythorax Dohrn det. Beier Type! ¥ =tuberculata lacking the right antenna, the right hind tarsus and Walker = hispida Pictet”. the half of the right hind tibia.

Chondrodera borneensis BRUNNER VON WATTEN­ Chibchella annulipes BEIER, 1960: 225 WYL, 1895: 80, f. 32 HOLOTYPE male (No. 2196) with labels: “Colum- SYNTYPES male (No. 2204) and two females (No. bien Hac. Pehlke E. Pehlke S. 1929”, “Type” [a red 2205 and 2206) with identical labels: “Borneo”, label], “Semileptotettix annulipes n. sp. det. Beier “Co=Typus” [a yellow label]; at a front of these Type! cf”. specimens a common label “Borneo borneensis Brunn.” was placed. Chlorophylla rufipes BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, Remarks. B e ie r (1954) included this species in the 1895: 266 genus Chondroderella HEBARD. In a later publica­ tion B e ie r (1962) did not consider the specimens SYNTYPE female (No. 2197) with labels: “Peru”, above mentioned as types. “Type” [a red label], “Cycloptera aurantifolia Stoll”, “Chlorophylla rufipes Dr. H. Dohrn Chondrodera subvitrea BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, determ.”, “ 121”, “Roxelanacrassicornis Stal ¥ det. 1895: 95 Beier”.

SYNTYPE male (No. 2207) with labels: “Gabun”, Choeroparnops fulvus DOHRN, 1888: 359-361 “Type” [a red label], “Chondrodera subvitrea Karsch Type det. Beier cf”. SYNTYPE male (No. 2198) with labels: “Manaos”, SYNTYPE female (No. 2208) with labels: “513”, “Type” [a red label], “ 181”, “Choeroparnops “Niger”, “Type” [a red label], “Chondrodera fulvus Dohrn det. Beier Type! cf”. subvitrea Karsch Type det. Beier ¥”; the male is SYNTYPE female (No. 2199) with labels: “Manaos”, lacking most of the right antenna, the female - of “Type” [a red label]. the right hind leg and the antennae.

http://rcin.org.pl 50 • A. Liana

Cleandrus latipennis BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, and different labels numbered: “404”, “405”, and 1895:40-41 “406”.

SYNTYPE female (No. 2209) with labels: “Mindanao”, “Co=Typus”, “Cleandrus latipennis Cocconotus gracilicauda B e ie r , 1960: 138, f. 80 Dr. H. Dohrn determ.”, “Pseudophyllus fortis HOLOTYPE (by original designation) male (No. Walker det. Beier 9”. 2219) with labels: “Columbia Pehlke”, “423” Remarks. In the original description a locality was [BEIER cited a number 410 by error], “Type” [a red B e ie r given as “Insulae Philippinae”. (1954) label], “Cocconotus gracilicauda n. sp. Type! cf synonymized this species with Pseudophyllus det. Beier”; the specimen is lacking both antennae. fortis W a l k e r . PARATYPE (by original designation as allotype), female (No. 2220) with labels: “Columbien (Hac. Cleandrus ligatus BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, 1895: Pehlke) E. Pehlke S.”, “410” [sic! no 411!], “Type” 40 [a red label], “Cocconotus gracilicauda n. sp. Allotype! 9 det. Beier”; the specimen is lacking LECTOTYPE male (No. 2210) with labels: “Sikkim”, the right antenna and the left hind leg. “Cleandrus ligatus Dr. H. Dohrn determ.”, Remarks. There is also another female with labels: “Pseudophyllus ligatus Br. W . det. BeierType! cf” . “Columbia Pehlke”, “411”, “Para-Type” [in a red Remarks. The species was probably described from a label], “Cocconotus gracilicauda n. sp. Paratype 9 single specimen of D o h r n ’s collection but B r u n ­ det. Beier”. BEIER (1960) in his original descrip­ n e r did not said this clearly. B e ie r (1962) desig­ tion did not note this female as a paratype. The nated the specimen from the D o h r n collection as label numbered “411” was attached mistakenly by the type (= lectotype) but he has mistakenly noted B e ie r to the mentioned above allotype. a sex of this specimen as female.

Cocconotus viridiafflatus BRUNNER VON WATTEN­ Climacoptera ornata BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, WYL, 1895: 208 1895:42 LECTOTYPE male (No. 2221) with labels: “Colum­ SYNTYPE male (No. 2211) with labels: “Java” bia” , “Type” [a red label], “Cratonotus viridiaf­ “Type” [a red label], “Climacoptera ornata Dr. H. flatus Br. W. det. Beier, cf Type!”; the specimen is Dohrn determ.”, “ornata x Brunn.”, “Climacoptera lacking the left hind tarsus, its antennae are badly parallela Walk. det. Beier cf”. damaged. SYNTYPE female (No. 2212) with labels: “Java”, Remarks. The species was described probably on the “Type” [a red label], “Climacoptera ornata Dr. H. basis of a single specimen from the D o h r n collec­ Dohrn determ.” “Climacoptera parallela Walk. det. tion but B r u n n e r v o n W a t t e n w y l did not Beier 9”. confirmed that clearly. BEIER (1960) designated as SYNTYPES three females (No. 2213-2215) with the type (= lectotype) only the male specimen labels: “Java”, “Climacoptera ornata Dr. H. Dohrn above mentioned. determ.”, “Climacoptera parallela Walk. det. Beier ? ”. These females have also labels numbered “88”, Colobotettix viridis BEIER, 1960: 174 “89”, and “90”. HOLOTYPE female (No. 2222) with labels: “Guate­ Cocconotus areolatus BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, mala”, “7”, “Type” [a red label], “Colobotettix 1895: 208-209 viridis n. sp. Type! 9 det. Beier”.

SYNTYPES three females (No. 2216-2218) with Cymatomera argillata K a r s c h , 1891b: 98 identical labels: “Cumbasi”, “Co=Typus” [a yellow label], “Cratonotus areolatus Br. W. det. Beier 9” HOLOTYPE female (No. 2223) with labels:

http://rcin.org.pl Type material of Pseudophyllidae • 51

“Camerun” [sic!], “Type” [a red label], “Cymato- “Typus” both specimens mentioned above. In this mera argillata Karsch det. Beier ¥”. situation neither can be considered as the lectotype Remarks. A terra typica was given by K a r s c h as designated by him. “Congo” probably by mistake or the specimen was wrongly labelled. BEIER (1962) designated the Despoina superba BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, female from the D o h r n collection as the type but 1895: 68-69 also cited “Kongo” as a terra typica. SYNTYPE male (No. 2231) with labels: “Bruni” Cymatomera modesta BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, [sic!], “Type” [a red label], “Despoina superba Br. 1895: 84-85. W. det. Beier cf”. SYNTYPE female (No. 2232) with labels: “Bruni” SYNTYPE female (No. 2224) with labels: “Baga- [sic!], “Type” [a red label], “Despoina superba Br. moyo”, “30”, “Type” [a red label], “Cymatomera W. det. Beier denticollis Schaum det. Beier ¥”. Remarks. BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL noted also SYNTYPE female (No. 2225) with labels specimens from the collection in Geneva but B eier “Madagasc.”, “Co=Typus” [a yellow label], (1962) designated as the type a specimen from the “Cymatomera denticollis Schaum det. Beier ? ”. D o h r n collection without a decision which among Remarks. Brunner VON W attenw yl (1895) m en ­ two specimens above mentioned. tioned that the female from Madagascar is of smaller size. B eier (1954) synonimized this spe­ c ie s w ith Cymatomera denticollis SCHAUM. Dicranostomus monoceros D o h r n , 1888: 362, t. 2, f. 2a, 2b Dasyscelus dilatatus BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, 1895: 120 HOLOTYPE female (No. 2233) with labels: “Cumbasi”, “Type” [a red label], “Dicranostomus SYNTYPES three females (No. 2226-2228) with monoceros Dohrn det. Beier ¥”. identical labels: “Santa Catarina”, “Co=Typus” Remarks. DOHRN (1888) cited the locality “Cumbasi [yellow labels], “Dasyscelus dilatatus Br. W. det. Peruviae ad Huallagam” as a terra typica. Beier ? ” and different labels numbered: “233”, “234”, “235”. Diophanes atrosignatus B r u n n e r v o n W a t t e n w y l , Remarks. This species was described on the basis of 1895:242-243 material from some collections: B r u n n e r ’s and D o h r n ’s collections and a collection of the Mu­ SYNTYPE female (No. 2234) with labels: “Yungas”, seum in Berlin. It is not known how many speci­ “69”, “Co=Typus” [a yellow label], “Xipho- mens should be considered as the types. phyllum atrosignatum Br. W. det. Beier ¥”. Remarks. The species based on the specimens from B r u n n e r v o n W a t t e n w y l , Despoina spinosa 1895: the B r u n n e r and D o h r n collections. B r u n n e r 69, f. 27c (1895) cited incorrectly “Juntas in Bolivia” as the lo ca lity . B e ie r (1960) designated only the speci­ SYNTYPE male (No. 2229) with labels: “Kina-Balu”, men from the BRUNNER collection as the type. “Type” [a red label], “Despoina spinosa Br. W. cf det. Beier”. SYNTYPE female (No. 2230) with labels: “Kina- Docidocercus fasciatus B e ie r , 1960: 170 Balu”, “Type” [a red label], “Despoina spinosa Br. W. ¥ det. Beier”. HOLOTYPE ( by original designation) male (No. Remarks. B r u n n e r v o n W a t t e n w y l describing this 2235) with labels: “Columbien Hac. Pehlke E. species did not note the number of specimens in Pehlke S. IV-VI 08”, “Type” [a red label], the type series. B e ie r (1962) has specified as “Eucocconotus fasciatus n. sp. det. Beier Type! cf”.

http://rcin.org.pl 52 • A. Liana

Docidocercus pehlkei B e ie r , 1960: 171 Habrocomes lanosus KARSCH, 1891b: 103, f. 13

HOLOTYPE (by original designation) male (No. HOLOTYPE female (No. 2242) with labels: “Sierra 2236) with labels: “Columbien Pehlke”, “421”, Leone”, “520”, “256”, “lanosus Karsch*”, “Type” “Type” [a red label], “Eucocconotus pehlkei n. sp. [a red label], “Habrocomes lanosus Karsch ¥ det. Type! cf det. Beier”. Beier”; the specimen is lacking the right middle leg, its left hind leg is pined under labels.

Echinacris alata BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, 1895: 163 Haenschiella ecuadorica B e ie r , 1960: 7

SYNTYPE male (No. 2237) with labels: “Iquitos”, HOLOTYPE (by original designation) male (No. “Type” [a red label], “ 183”, “Choeroparnops alata 2243) with labels: “Santa Inez (Ecuad.) R. Haensch (Br. W.) det. Beier Type! cf”; the specimen is S.”, “61”, “Type” [a red label], “Haenschiella lacking the left hind leg, its left hind wing is ecuadorica n. sp. Type! cf det. Beier”; the specimen damaged. is lacking the left antenna, its right antenna is damaged.

Gongrocnemis pallide spinosa B r u n n e r v o n W a t t e n w y l , 1895: 165-166, f. 75 Homalaspis laeta BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, 1895: 217, f. 93 SYNTYPE female (No. 2238) with labels: “Guate­ mala”, “359”, “Co=Typus” [a yellow label], SYNTYPE male (No. 2244) with labels: “Cumbasi”, “Type” [a red label], “Ancistrocercus vicinus n. sp. “Type”, “15”, “Glaphyraspis laeta (Br. W.) det. Type! det. Beier”. Beier cf” ; the specimen is badly damaged: the right Remarks. The species was described on the basis of fore and the right middle legs and its antennae are unknown number of specimens from several missing. collections: the B r u n n e r ’s , the D o h r n ’s and the SYNTYPE female (No. 2245) with labels: “Cumbasi”, S t a n d f u s s ’s ones. “ 16”, “Type” [a red label], “Glaphyraspis laeta (br. W.) det. Beier ¥”; the specimen is lacking most Gongrocnemis truncatistyla BRUNNER VON part of antennae. W a t t e n w y l , 1895: 169 SYNTYPE male (No. 2239) with labels: “Cumbasi”, Jamaicana unicolor BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, “Type” [a red label], “Ancistrocercus truncati- 1895: 147 stylus Br. = Anchiptolis obtusus cf det. Beier Type!”. SYNTYPE male (No. 2246) with labels: “Jamaica”, “Type” [a red label], “ 189”, “Jamaicana unicolor Br. W. det. Beier Type! cf” . Gonyatopus pilosus B r u n n e r v o n W a t t e n w y l , Remarks. There is also a female with a red label 1895:64 “Type” but it can not be considered as the type be­ SYNTYPE female (No. 2240) with labels: “Java”, cause B r u n n e r v o n W a t t e n w y l (1895) cited only “Type” [a red label], “Gonyatopus pilosus” [a label male in the original description. typed]; the specimen is lacking the left antenna and the left hind leg. Jamaicana vittata BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, 1895: SYNTYPE female (No. 2241) with labels: “Java”, 147, f. 64 “Co=Typus” [a yellow label], “Gonyatopus pilosus Br. W. det. Beier the specimen is lacking the SYNTYPE male (No. 2247) with labels: “Jamaica”, abdomen. “Type” [a red label], “ 184”, “Jamaicana vittata Br. Remarks. The species was described only on the basis W. det. Beier Type! cf” , “Jamaicana subguttata of a material from the D o h r n collection. (Walk.) det. Beier”.

http://rcin.org.pl Type material of Pseudophyllidae • 53

Remarks. Remarks. There are also three females with Leptotettix dohrni B r u n n e r v o n W a t t e n w y l , 1895: yellow labels “Co=Typus” but they can not be 224-225 considered as the types because B r u n n e r VON SYNTYPE female (No. 2253) with labels: “Sara- W a t t e n w y l (1895) cited only male in the original description. Species synonimized with Jamaicana yacu”, “31”, “Type” [a red label], “Platychiton dohrni (br. W.) det Beier ? Type!”. subguttata (WALKER) by KlRBY (1906). Remarks. This species was based only on a material from the DOHRN collection. Kopis brasiliensis BEIER, 1960: 31-32, f. 17

HOLOTYPE female (No. 2248) with labels: Leptotettix nigronotatus BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, “Espirito-Santo Brasil ex coll. Fruhstorfer”, 1895:224 “Type” [a red label], “Kopis n. gen. brasiliensis n. SYNTYPE male (No. 2254) with labels: “Guatemala”, sp. Type! ? det. Beier”; the specimen has damaged “33”, “Type” [a red label], “Cratonotus nigro­ the left fore leg and the right antenna. notatus Br. W. Type! cf det. Beier”. Remarks. The species was described on the basis of a Labidocercus amazonicus B e ie r , 1954: 390 material from the D o h r n collection. It was synonimized by M. B e ie r , at first (B eie r 1960) HOLOTYPE (by original designation), female (No. with Calamoptera modesta (BRUNNER VON 2249) with labels: “Amazonas”, “292”, W a t t e n w y l , 1895) later (B e ie r 1962) with C. “Co=Typus” [a yellow label], “Type” [a red label], immunis (WALKER, 1870). “Labidocercus amazonicus n. sp. Type! ? det. Beier”; the specimen is lacking the left fore leg Leptotettix voluptarius B r u n n e r v o n W a t t e n w y l , (except a coxa) and the right antenna, the left 1895: 223 antenna is also damaged. SYNTYPE male (No. 2255) with labels: “Cumbasi”, “Co=Typus” [a yellow label], “31”, “Leptotettix Lacipoda immunda B r u n n e r v o n W a t t e n w y l , voluptarius Br. W. cf det. Beier”. 1895: 66 Remarks. The species was described on the basis of a SYNTYPE male (No. 2250) with labels: “Bruni material from B r u n n e r ’s and D o h r n ’s collec­ [sic!]”, “Type” [a red label], “Lacipoda immunda tions. Br. W. Type det. Beier cf” . Remarks. The species was described only on the basis Leurophyllum albidovenosum BEIER, 1954:376-377, of a material from the D o h r n collection. B r u n n e r f. 196 cited “Brunei in insula Borneo” as a terra typica. HOLOTYPE (by original designation) male (No. 2256) with labels: “Columbien (Hac. Pehlke) E. Lagarodes facetus K a r s c h , 1891b: 91, f. 6 Pehlke S.”, “Leurophyllum albidovenosum n. sp. det. Beier Type! cf” , “Type” [a red label]; the HOLOTYPE female (No. 2251) with labels: “510”, specimen with antennae badly damaged. “Camerun”, “Lagarodes facetus Karsch det. Beier PARATYPE (by original designation as the allotype) ?”. female (No. 2257) with labels: “Columbien (Hac. Pehlke) E. Pehlke S.”, “Leurophyllum albidoveno­ Leiobliastes levigatus BEIER, 1960: 115 sum n. sp. det. Beier Type! “Type” [a red label]. HOLOTYPE male (No. 2252) with labels: “Bolivien Remarks. The third specimen designated by B eier Prov. Sara Steinbach S.”, “417”, “Type” [a red (1954) as the paratype,) with label “Ecuador, label], “Cratonotus levigatus n. sp. Type! cf det. Canelos Niepelt leg.”, was not found in our collec­ Beier”. tion.

http://rcin.org.pl 54 • A. Liana

Lichenochrus fuscoalatus BRUNNER VON WATTEN­ “Mataeus longipennis x K”, “Zabalius lineolatus WYL, 1895: 127 Stal det Beier

Mataeus sumatranus BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, Liocentrum aduncum KARSCH, 1891b: 88-89, f. 3 1895:29-30 SYNTYPE male (No. 2260) with labels: “511”, SYNTYPE female (No. 2269) with labels: “Dohrn “Sierra Leone”, “Co=Typus”, “Liocentrum Sumatra Soekaranda”, “Type”{a red label], aduncum Dr. H. Dohrn determ.”, “Liocentrum “Mataeus sumatranus Dr. H. Dohrn determ.”, aduncum Karsch d" det. Beier”. “Morsimus sumatranus Br. W. det. Beier Type! SYNTYPE female (No. 2261) with labels: “512”, ¥”; antennae damaged. “Sierra Leone”, “Co=Typus”, “Liocentrum aduncum Dr. H. Dohrn determ.”, “Liocentrum aduncum Karsch ¥ det. Beier”. Meroncidius brunneus B e ie r , 1960: 63-64 HOLOTYPE (by original designation) male (No. Mataeus latipennis K a r s c h , 1891b: 84 2270) with labels: “Bahia”, “318”, “Type” [a red SYNTYPE female (No. 2262) with labels: “Gabun”, label], “Meroncidius brunneus n. sp. Type! det. “Co=Typus” [a yellow label], “Mataeus latipennis Beier cf”; the specimen is lacking the right fore Dr. H. Dohrn determ.”, “Zabalius apicalis Bol. ? tarsus, the right middle leg and the right antenna. det. Beier”. PARATYPE (by original designation as allotype) SYNTYPE male (No. 2263) with labels: “Gabun”, female (No. 2271) with labels: “Bahia”, “317”, “Co=Typus” “Mataeus latipennis Dr. H. Dohrn “Type” [a red label], “Meroncidius brunneus n. sp. determ.”, “Opisthodicrus cochlearistylus Karsch Allotype! det. Beier ¥”. det. Beier a"”. Microprion ceylonicus B r u n n e r VON W a t t e n w y l , Mataeus longipennis KARSCH, 1891b: 84 1895: 61-62

SYNTYPE male (No. 2264) with labels: “507”, SYNTYPE male (No. 2272) with labels: “Nord- “Camerun”, “Co=Typus” [a yellow label], Ceylon Juni 1889 H. Fruhstorfer”, “Co=Typus”,

http://rcin.org.pl Type material of Pseudophyllidae • 55

“ceylonicus x Brunn”, “Brunneriana opaca (Walk.) SYNTYPE female (No. 2284) with labels: “Sierra det. Beier cf” . Leone”, “Type” [a red label], “337”, “Mormotus SYNTYPE female (No. 2273) with labels: “Siid- clavaticercus Karsch ? det. Beier”. Ceylon Mai 1889 H. Fruhstorfer”, “Co=Typus”, Remarks. There are three more specimens from Sierra “Brunneriana opaca (Walk.) det. G. M. Henry 1935 Leone but it is not clear if they can to be included ?”. in the type series (male and female with yellow labels “Co=Typus” and female without a yellow

Mimetica pehlkei E n d e r l e in , 1917: 18-19, figu re label). without a number Mormotus curvicauda BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, SYNTYPES five females (No. 2274-2278), all with 1895:156 labels: “Columbien, Hac. Pehlke, E. Pehlke S. IV-VI 08”, “Type” [a red label], “Mimetica SYNTYPE female (No. 2285) with labels: “Gabun”, Pehlkei Enderl. ? Type Dr. Enderlein det. 1916”, “344”, “Type” [a red label], “Mormotus curvi­ “Mimetica pehlkei Enderl. ? det. Beier”. The cauda Br. W. ? Type det. Beier”; the specimen is specimens have also labels numbered: “ 108”, lacking the right antenna and the right hind tarsus. “ 109”, “ 110”, “ 111”, and “112”. Morsimus quadratus kaestneri BE IE R , 1954: 195-196, f. 110 Mimetica viridifolia BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, 1895:257 HOLOTYPE (by original designation) male (No. SYNTYPE male (No. 2279) with labels: “Chiriqui”, 2286) with labels: “Java”, “19”, “Morsimus “Type” [a red label], “Mimetica viridifolia Brunner kastneri n. sp. det. Beier cf Type!”, “Type” [a red label]. Type cf” , “Mimetica viridifolia Br. W . det. Beier Type!”. PARATYPE (by original designation as allotype) female (No. 2287) with labels: “Java”, “17”, “Type” [a red label], “Morsimus kastneri n. sp. det. Mioacris robusta B e ie r , 1954: 81-82 Beier Allotype! ?”. HOLOTYPE (by original designation) male (No. 2280) with labels: “Kina Balu”, “Type” [a red Morsimus serratus B e ie r , 1954: 194 label], “122”, “Mioacris robusta n. sp. Type! det. HOLOTYPE male (No. 2288) with labels: “Jolo”, Beier cf” . “23”, “Morsimus serratus n. sp. det. Beier Type! PARATYPE (by original designation as allotype) cf” , “Type” [a red label]. female (No. 2281) with labels: “Nord-Bomeo Waterstradt”, “Co=Typus” [a yellow label], “123”, Myopophyllum speciosum B e ie r , 1960: 238-239 “Mioacris robusta n. sp. Allotype! det. Beier ? ”. HOLOTYPE (by original designation) male (No. 2289) with labels: “SantaInez (Ecuad.) R. Haensch Mormotus angustus B r u n n e r v o n W a t t e n w y l , S ”, “Type” [a recj label], “Myopophyllum 1895:155 speciosum n. g. n. sp. Type! cf det. Beier”. SYNTYPE female (No. 2282) with labels: PARATYPE (by original designation as allotype) “Camerun”, “335”, “Type” [a red label], “Mormo­ female (No. 2290) with labels: “Santa Inez tus angustus Br. W. ? det. Beier Type”. (Ecuad.) R. Haensch S.”, “380”, “Myopophyllum speciosum n. g. n. sp. Allotype! ? det. Beier”. Mormotus clavaticercus K a r s c h , 1891b: 111 Nannotettix pehlkei B e ie r , 1960: 76-77 SYNTYPE male (No. 2283) with labels: “Sierra Leone”, “Type” [a red label], “Mormotus HOLOTYPE (by original designation) female (No. clavaticercus Karsch det. Beier cf” . 2291) with labels: “Columbien (Natagaima) E.

http://rcin.org.pl 56 • A. Liana

Pehlke S.”, “Type” [a red label], “13”, lacking the right fore leg and both antennae, the “Nannotettix pehlkei n. sp. Type! ? det. Beier”. left fore wing is badly damaged. PARATYPE (by original designation as allotype) male (No. 2292) with labels: “Columbien Pemba cochleata B e ie r , 1960: 198 (Natagaima) E. Pehlke S.”, “Type” [a red label], “12”, “Nannotettix pehlkei n. sp. Allotype! d" larva HOLOTYPE (by original designation) male (No. det. Beier”. 2305) with labels: “Santa Inez (Ecuad.) R. Haensch s *», “27 ”^ “Type” [a red label], “Pemba cochleata n. sp. Type! d" det. Beier” ; antennae of this speci­ Natagaima brevipennis B e ie r , 1960: 152-153, f. 95 men are damaged. HOLOTYPE (by original designation) female (No.

2293) with labels: “Columbien (Natagaima) E. Pemba peruana BEIER, 1960: 196-197 Pehlke S.”, “393”, “Type” [a red label], “Cocco­ notus brevipennis n. sp. Type! ? det. Beier” . PARATYPE (by original designation) female (No. PARATYPES seven females (No. 2294-2300) with 2306) with labels: “Peru Chanchamayo labels: “Columbien (Natagaima) E. Pehlke S.”, Hoffmanns”, “55”, “Type” [a red label], “Pemba “Para-Type” [a red label], “Cocconotus brevi­ peruana n. sp. Paratype! ? det. Beier”. pennis n. sp. Paratype ? det. Beier”; these speci­ mens have also labels numbered: “387”, “389”, Pezochiton grandis B e ie r , 1960: 263-264, f. 161 “391”, “395”, “396”, “397”, and “398”. HOLOTYPE (by original designation) male (No. Oxyscelus angustipennis BRUNNER VON WATTEN­ 2394) with labels: “Columbien (Hac. Pehlke) E. WYL, 1895:71 Pehlke S.”, “36”, “Type” [a red label], “Pezochiton grandis n. sp. Type!

Parapleminia accola B e ie r , 1954: 396 PARATYPES (by original designation) male (No. 2309) and two females (No. 2310 and 2311) with HOLOTYPE (by original designation) female (No. labels: “Nord Borneo Waterstradt“, “Paratype“ [a 2304) with labels: “Espirito-Santo Brasil H. red label]. Fruhstorfer”, “Type” [a red label], “Parapleminia PARATYPE female (No. 2312) with labels: “Bor­ accola n. sp. det. Beier Type! ?” ; the specimen is neo", “Paratype" [a red label].

http://rcin.org.pl Type material of Pseudophyllidae • 57

PARATYPE female (No. 2313) with labels: Platyphyllum pleminioides BRUNNER VON “Bangaai“, “Paratype“ [a red label]; all mentioned W a t t e n w y l , 1895: 140 above paratypes are provided with B e ie r ’s deter­ mination labels. SYNTYPE female (No. 2320) with labels: “Amazonas”, “Type” [a red label], “185”, “Steno­ schema pleminioides (Br. W.)Type! det. Beier ?”; Phyllomimus inversus BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, the specimen has antennae badly damaged. 1895: 57-58

Platyphyllum unicolor BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, SYNTYPE male (No. 2314) with labels: “Java“, “Co- 1895:139 Typus“, “Phyllomimus ampullaceus Haan (= inversus Br. W.) det. Beier cf” . SYNTYPE female (No. 2321) with labels: SYNTYPE male (No. 2315) with labels: “Dohrn “Amazonas”, “Type” [a red label], “188”, Sumatra Soekaranda" [“Deli” in the original “Rhinischia unicolor (Br. W.) det. Beier Type! ? ”. description], “Co-Typus“ [a yellow label]. SYNTYPE female (No. 2322) with labels: SYNTYPE female (No. 2316) with labels: “Sumatra", “Amazonas”, “292”, “Co=Typus” [a yellow label], “Co-Typus“. “Type” [a red label], “Labidocercus amazonicus n. Remarks. All mentioned above specimens syntypes sp. Type! ? det. Beier”. are provided with B e ie r ’s determinating labels SYNTYPE female (No. 2323) with labels: “Cumbasi”, “Phyllomimus ampullaceus Haan (=inversus Br. “Co=Typus” [a yellow label]. W .)“ . In reality M . B e ie r has never synonimized Remarks. The species was described on the basis of a these species. material from the DOHRN collection. BRUNNER cited “Ucayali et Tapajos in territorio Amazonico” as its locality. One of females from “Amazonas” Phyllomimus pallidus B r u n n e r v o n W a t t e n w y l , numbered 292 (an old number) was described by 1 8 9 5 :5 7 BEIER (1954) as the holotype of Labidocercus amazonicus (a new number of the type 2249). SYNTYPE female (No. 2317) with labels: “Palawan", “Co-Typus“ [yellow label], “Phyllomimus pallidus Br. W. det. Beier Pleminia mutica B r u n n e r VON W a t t e n w y l , 1895: Remarks. The species was based on specimens from 124-125 some collections. SYNTYPE female (No. 2324) with labels: “Huamba”, “Type” [a red label], “249”, “Pleminia mutica Br. W. ¥ det. Beier”; the specimen with antennae Platenia semialata DOHRN, 1888: 353-355, ff. 4a-c badly damaged. HOLOTYPE female (No. 2318) with labels: “Palawan”, “Type” [a red label], “Platenia semia­ Polyglochin peculiaris K a r s c h , 1891b: 101, f. 12 lata Dohrn ? det. Beier”. HOLOTYPE (by monotypy) female (No. 2325) with labels: “SierraLeone”, “518”, “Type” [a red label], Platyphyllum guttatum BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, “Polyglochin peculiaris Karsch det. Beier ?”. 1895: 140

Promeca borneana BEIER, 1954: 88-89, f. 46 SYNTYPE male (No. 2319) with labels: “Cumbasi”, “Type” [a red label], “ 187”, “Stenoschema gutta­ PARATYPE (by original designation) female (No. tum (Br. W.) det. Beier Type! cf”; the specimen is 2326) with labels: “Nord-Borneo Waterstradt”, lacking the right hind leg and the left antenna, the “13”, “Promeca borneana n. sp. det. Beier Para­ right antenna is damaged. type! ?”.

http://rcin.org.pl 58 • A. Liana

PARATYPE (by original designation) female (No. 2335) with labels: “Lifu”, “Acanthoprion insulare 2327) with labels: “Labuan” “12”, “Promeca n. sp. Type! cf det. Beier”. borneana n. sp. det. Beier Paratype! 9”. Rhinischia bacillifera BEIER, 1954: 387-388 Promeca nobilis B e ie r , 1954: 91-92 HOLOTYPE (by original designation) male (No. HOLOTYPE (by original designation) female (No. 2336) with labels: “Columbien, Hac. Pehlke, E. 2 3 2 8 ) with labels: “Nord-Borneo, Waterstradt”, Pehlke S. IV-VI 08”, “Type” [a red label], “Promeca nobilis n. sp. det. Beier Type! 9” ; the “Rhinischia bacillifera n. sp. det. Beier Type! cf”. specimen is lacking the left hind leg. Rhomboptera honorablis BRUNNER VON Promeca ornata BEIER, 1954: 89-90 W a t t e n w y l , 1895: 38

HOLOTYPE (by original designation) female (No. SYNTYPE male (No. 2337) with labels: “Sumatra”, 2329) with labels: “Nord-Borneo Waterstradt”, “Co=Typus”, “Rhomboptera honorabilis Dr. H. “Promeca ornata n. sp. det. Beier Type! 9”. Dohrn determ.”, “340”, “Rhomboptera honorabilis Br. W. det. Beier cf” .

Promeca sumatrana B e ie r , 1954: 90-91 SYNTYPE female (No. 2338) with labels: “Nord Borneo”, “Co=Typus”, “Rhomboptera honorabilis HOLOTYPE (by original designation) female (No. Dr. H. Dohrn determ.”, “Rhomboptera honorabilis 2330) with labels: “Dohrn Sumatra Soekaranda”, Br. W. det. Beier 9”. “Promeca sumatrana n. sp. det. Beier Type! ?”. PARATYPE (by original designation as allotype) intermedia BEIER, 1944: 88 male (No. 2331) with labels: “Dohrn Sumatra Soekaranda”, “14”, “Promeca sumatrana n. sp. det. HOLOTYPE (by original designation) male (No. Beier Type! o’1”. Both specimens have also red 2339) with labels: “Tonkin Than Moi Juni-Juli H. labels “Type”. Fruhstorfer”, “Type” [a red label], “Sanaa inter­ media n. sp. Type cf det. Beier”. Promeca unicolor BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, PARATYPE (by original designation as allotype) 1 8 9 5 : 5 2 - 5 3 female (No. 2340) with labels: “Tonkin Than Moi Juni-Juli H. Fruhstorfer”, “Type” [a red label], SYNTYPE male (No. 2332) with labels: “Type” [a “ n. sp. Allotype! 9 det. Beier”. red label], “Kina Balu” “143”, “Phyllomimus unicolor Br. W. det. Beier 0"”. SYNTYPE female (No. 2333) with labels: “Kina Sathrophylliopsis truncatipennis B e ie r , 1944: 87 Balu”, “ 144“, “Type” [a red label], “Phyllomimus HOLOTYPE (by original designation) male (No. unicolor Br. W. det. Beier 9”. 2341) with labels: “Nord Borneo Waterstradt”, “62”, “Type” [a red label], “Sathrophylliopsis B r u n n e r v o n W a t t e n w y l , 1895: Promeca vittata truncatipennis n. sp. Type! cf det. Beier”. 5 2 , f. 18 PARATYPE (by original designation as allotype) SYNTYPE male (No. 2334) with labels: “Java”, “Co- female (No. 2342) with labels: “Nord Borneo Typus”, “vittata x Brunn”, “Promeca fuscescens Waterstradt”, “Type” [a red label], “Sathrophyllio­ psis truncatipennis n. sp. Allotype! 9 det. Beier”. Haan cf det. Beier”.

Pseudacanthoprion insulare B e ie r , 1954: 202-203, Schedocentrus andinus BEIER, 1960: 97-98 f. 116 HOLOTYPE (by original designation) male (No. HOLOTYPE (by original designation) male (No. 2343) with labels: “Santa Inez (Ecuad.) R. Haensch

http://rcin.org.pl Type material of Pseudophyllidae • 59

S.”, “6”, “Type” [a red label], “Cratonotus Scopiorus latifolius B r u n n e r v o n W a t t e n w y l , andinum n. sp. Type! cf det. Beier”. 1895:238 Remarks. The specimen female with a label “Para- Type” was not considered by BEIER (1960) in the SYNTYPE female (No. 2350) with labels: “Tapajos”, original description. “Co=Typus”; the hind left wind is damaged.

Schedocentrus haenschi Beier , 1960: 103-104 Scopiorus muticus BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, 1895:237 HOLOTYPE (by original designation) female (No. 2344) with labels: “Napo (Ecuad. R. Haensch S.”, SYNTYPE female (No. 2351) with labels: “Chiriqui”, “361”, “Type” [a red label], “Cratonotus haenschi “Type” [a red label], “Scopiorus muticus Br. W. n. sp. Type! ? det. Beier”; the specimen is lacking det. Beier ?”. the left hind leg and its antennae are badly dam­ aged. Semileptotettix elegans BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, 1895:226

Schochia viridis B e ie r , 1954: 282-283 SYNTYPE female (No. 2352) with labels: “Ucayali”, “Type” [a red label], “37”, “Drepanoxiphus HOLOTYPE (by original designation) female (No. elegans Br. W. det. Beier ¥”. 2345) with labels: “Espirito-Santo Brasil H. SYNTYPE female (No. 2353) with labels: “Ucayali”, Fruhstorfer”, “62”, “Type” [a red label], “Schochia “Co=Typus”, “3 8 ”, “Drepanoxiphus elegans Br. viridis n. sp. Type! det. Beier W. det. Beier ¥”.

Simodera halterata KARSCH, 1891a: 103, f. 1 Scopioricus robustus BEIER, 1960: 298 SYNTYPE female (No. 2354) with labels: “Madagas­ HOLOTYPE (by original designation) male (No. car”, “196”, “Type” [a red label], “ 180”, 2346) with labels: “Columbien Hac. Pehlke E. “Simodera halterata Karsch ¥ det. Beier Type”. Pehlke S. 1929”, “Type” [a red label], “Scopiorus robustus n. sp. det. Beier Type! cf”. Stenampyx annulicornis KARSCH, 1891b: 93 PARATYPE (by original designation as allotype) female (No. 2347) with labels: “Columbien Hac. SYNTYPE female (No. 2355) with labels: Pehlke E. Pehlke S. IV-VI. 08”, “Type” [a red “Camerun”, “Co=Typus” [a yellow label], “Sten­ label], “Scopiorus robustus n. sp. det. Beier Allo­ ampyx annulicornis Karsch det. Beier type! ? ”. SYNTYPE female (No. 2356) with labels: “5 0 9 ”, PARATYPE (by original designation) female (No. “Camerun”, “Co=Typus” [a yellow label], “Sten­ 2348) with labels: “Columbien Fusagasuga E. ampyx annulicornis Karsch det. Beier”. Pehlke S.”, “59”, “Scopiorus robustus n. sp. Para­ type! ¥ det. Beier”. Tanusiella guttifera ENDERLEIN, 1917: 17-18

Scopiorinus similis Beier, 1960: 305 LECTOTYPE male (No. 2357) with labels: “Espirito- Santo Brasil ex coll. Fruhstorfer”, “Type” [a red HOLOTYPE (by original designation) female (No. label], “9 0 ”,“Tanusiella guttifera Enderl. cf Type 2349) with labels: “Chiriqui”, “57”, “Type” [a red Dr. Enderlein det. 1916”, “Tanusiella guttifera label], “Scopiorus similis n. sp. Type! ¥ det. End. Type cf det. Beier”; the specimen lacks the Beier”; the specimen lacks the right fore leg, its right fore and the middle tarsi, its antennae are antennae are damaged. badly damaged.

http://rcin.org.pl 60 • A. Liana

PARALECTOTYPE female (No. 2358) with labels: Teleutias vitripennis B e ie r , 1960: 201-202 “Espirito-Santo Brasil ex coll. Fruhstorfer”, HOLOTYPE (by original designation) female (No. “Type” [a red label], “68”, “Tanusiella guttifera 2 3 6 9 ) with labels: “Pebas Nov. Dez. 19 0 6 M. de Enderl. ¥ Type Dr. Enderlein det. 1916”, Mathan S.”, “2 8 ” , “Teleutias vitripennis n. sp. “Tanusiella guttifera End. Allotype ¥ det. Beier”; Type! ¥ det. Beier”. the specimen lacks the left middle leg, its antennae are badly damaged. Remarks. Lectotype and paralectotype were desig­ Temnophyllus atrosignatus BRUNNER VON W attenw yl, 1895: 47 nated by Max B e ie r as the type and the allotype

only by labels pined under the specimens. SYNTYPES three females (No. 2370-2372) with identical labels: “Java” “TenTnophyllus atrosigna­ Teleutias bolivianus B e ie r , 1960: 214 tus Br. W. det. Beier ¥” and different labels num­ bered “110”, “111”, and “112”. HOLOTYPE (by original designation) male (No. 2359) with labels: “Bolivien Prov. Sara Steinbach S.”, “210”, “Type” [a red label], “Teleutias Temnophyllus insularis BEIER, 1954: 93-94 bolivianus n. sp. det. Beier Type! cf”. HOLOTYPE (by original designation) female (No. PARATYPE (by original designation as allotype), 2 3 7 3 ) with labels: “ 11” , “Palawan”, “Tympano- female (No. 2360) with labels: “Bolivien Prov. phyllum insularis sp. n. det. Beier Type! ¥”. Sara Steinbach S.”, “214”, “Type” [a red label], “Teleutias bolivianus n. sp. det. Beier Allotype! Temnophyllus speciosus BRUNNER VON WATTEN­ ¥ ”. WYL, 1 8 9 5 :4 6

Teleutias brevifolius BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, SYNTYPE female (No. 2 3 7 4 ) with labels: “Borneo”, 1895:230 “Co=Typus” [a yellow label], “Temnophyllus speciosus Dr. H. Dohrn determ.”, “Temnophyllus SYNTYPES male (No. 2361) and two females (No. speciosus Br. W. det. Beier ¥”. 2362 and 2363) with labels: “Sara-yacu”, “Co=Typus” [yellow labels], “Teleutias brevifolius Br. W. det. Beier a* [or] ¥”; male with label num­ Tetragonomera obtusa BRUNNER VON W a t t e n w y l , bered “48”, females with labels numbered “49” 1895: 104 and “50”. SYNTYPE female (No. 2 3 7 5 ) with labels: “Bahia”, “Co=Typus” [a yellow label], “Tetragonomera Teleutias fasciatus BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, obtusa Br. W. ¥ det. Beier”; the specimen is badly 1895:231 damaged. SYNTYPE male (No. 2364) with labels: “Sara-yacu”, Tetragonomera simplex Beier, 1954:284-285, f. 159 “Type” [a red label], “Teleutias fasciatus Br. W. det. Beier cf Type!”. HOLOTYPE (by original designation) female (No. 2 3 7 6 ) with labels: “Espirito-Santo Brasil H. Teleutias vicinissimus BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, Fruhstorfer”, “Type” [a red label], “Tetragonomera 1895:229 simplex n. sp. det. Beier Type! ¥”; the specimen is lacking the left fore leg and the right hind leg. SYNTYPES, three males (No. 2365-2367) and female (No. 2368) with labels: “Amazonas”, “Co=Typus” Timanthes javanicus BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, [a yellow label], “Teleutias vicinissimus Br. W. 1 8 9 5 :6 5 det. Beier cf [or] ¥”; males with old labels num­ bered: “44”, “45” and “47”, female with label SYNTYPE female (No. 2 3 7 7 ) with labels: “Java”, numbered “46”. “Co-Typus” [a yellow label], “Gonyatopus

http://rcin.org.pl Type material of Pseudophyllidae • 61

pilosus” [a label typed], “Timanthes javanicus 2385) with labels: “Kina Balu” , “Type”, Br.W. det. Beier ¥”. “Tympanophyllum montanum n. sp. Type! cf det. SYNTYPE female (No. 2378) with labels: “Java”, Beier”. “Type” [a red label], “javanicus x Brunn.”, “Timanthes virescens Serv. det. Beier ?”. Tympanoptera atroterminata BRUNNER VON B e ie r (1962) designated only the first specimen as the W attenwyl, 1895, p. 67 typ e. SYNTYPES two females (No. 2386 and 2387) with labels: “Kina-Balu”, “Tympanophyllum atro- Timanthes latifolius B runner VON WATTENWYL, 1985: 65 terminatum Br. W. det. Beier ?”. One of them have also a red label “Type”. SYNTYPE male (No. 2379) with labels: “India”, Remarks. The specimen male with labels: “Bruni”, “Co=Typus” [a yellow label], “India latifolius x “Type” [a red label], “Tympanophyllum atro- Brunn”, “Timanthes porrectus (Walk.) det. Beier terminatum Br. W. det. Beier cf” can not to be cf” . included in type series because BRUNNER v o n W a t t e n w y l cited only females. Tomias stenopterus KARSCH, 1891b: 36, f. 5 HOLOTYPE female (No. 2380) with labels: “508”, Tympanoptera rhodei B e i e r , 1954: 51 “Camerun”, “Type” [a red label], “Tomias steno­ HOLOTYPE (by original designation) female (No. pterus Karsch det. Beier the specimen lacks the 2388) with labels: “Neu Guinea”, “Type” [a red right fore leg, the tarsus of a left hind leg and the label], “Tympanoptera rhodei n. sp. Type! det. left antenna. Beier ? ”. This specimen was described as a type of Aprion rhodei BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, 1985 Triencentrus amazonicus Brunner von W atten­ and therefore it has a second number of the type w y l , 1895: 152 2175; the antennae and hind tarsi damaged. SYNTYPE male (No. 2381) with labels: “Amazonas”, “329”, “Co=Typus” [yellow label], “Cratonotus Tympanoptera serrulata B E IE R , 1954: 184 amazonicus Br. W. cf det. Beier”. HOLOTYPE (by original designation) female (No. SYNTYPE male (No. 2382) with labels: “Amazonas”, 2389) with labels: “Obi 5. 1902”, “Tympanoptera “331”, “Co=Typus” [a yellow label], “Cratonotus serrulata n. sp. det. Beier Type! ?”. amazonicus Br. W . cf det. Beier”.

Typophyllum abruptum BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, Tympanocompus acclivis K a r s c h , 1891b: 108-109, 1895:282 f. 16 SYNTYPE male (No. 2383) with labels: “Camerun”, SYNTYPE female (No. 2390) with labels: “Bolivia”, “519”, “Co=Typus” [a yellow label], “Tympano­ “Type” [a red label], “Typophyllum abruptum Brunn cf Type”, “114”, “Typophyllum abruptum compus acclivis Karsch cf det. Beier” . SYNTYPE female (No. 2384) with labels: Br. W. det. Beier Type the specimen is dam­ “Camerun”, “Tympanocompus acclivis Karsch det. aged: the antennae nearly missing, the right fore Beier male is badly damaged: its right antenna, tibia and the tarsus and the middle tarsi missing. right middle leg and its abdomen are missing. Female has only antennae damaged. Typophyllum curtum V lG N O N , 1926: 208-209

HOLOTYPE (by original designation) male (No. Tympanophyllum montanum BEIER, 1954, pp. 2391) with labels: “Cumbasi”, “Mimica simoni 1 6 0 -1 6 1 Boliv. cf Dr. H. Dohrn determ.”, “100”, “Typo­ HOLOTYPE (by original designation) male (No. phyllum curtum Vignon det. Beier Type! cf” .

http://rcin.org.pl 62 • A. Liana

Typophyllum lacinipennis ENDERLEIN, 1917: 19-20 Anchiptolis pleminioides B r u n n e r v o n W a t t e n ­ w y l , 1895:170 HOLOTYPE (by original designation), female (No. 2392) with labels: “Bolivien Prov. Sara Steinbach The species described on the basis of a material S.”, “Type” [a red label], “ 102”, “Typophyllum from B r u n n e r ’s and D o h r n ’s collections. lacinipennis Enderl. ¥ Type Dr. Enderlein det. 1916”, “Typophyllum lacinipennis End. ¥ det. Cocconotus modestus BRUNNER VON WATTENWYL, Beier Type!”. 1895: 204 The species was described on the basis of a mate­ Xiphophyllum latipenne BEIER, 1960: 23 rial from the collection in Geneva and D o h r n ’s one.

HOLOTYPE (by original designation) male (No. Diophanes nigrospinosus B r u n n e r v o n W a t t e n ­ 2393) with labels: “Peru Chanchamayo w y l , 1895:143 Hoffmanns”, “Type” [a red label], “340”, “Paracratonotus latipennis n. sp. Type! cf det. The species described on the basis of a material Beier”. from B o l iv a r ’s and D o h r n ’s collections. Remarks. The B e ie r ’s label includes the generic name never published. Indeed B e ie r (1960) described a R e f e r e n c e s

new genus Xiphophyllum in which placed a new B e i e r , M. 1944. Zur Kenntnis der Cymatomerini. Stettiner species latipenne. Entomologische Zeitung, Stettin, 105: 86-90. BEIER, M. 1950. Das Genus Panoploscelis SCUDDER. Verh. 8. Intern. Congr. Entomol., Stockholm, 1948: 111-115. T h e T y p e S p e c i m e n s N o t F o u n d i n O u r B e i e r , M. 1954. Revision der Pseudophylliden (1. Halfte). Trab.

C o l l e c t i o n Inst. Espan. Entomol. Madrid, 479 pp. B e ie r M. 1957. aus dem Belgischen Kongo. Hemigyrus acutifolius BRUNNER VON W a t t e n w y l , Revue de zoologie et de botanique africaines, Bruxelles, 1895:48 55: 52 BEIER, M. 1960. Orthoptera. (Pseudophyllinae II). In: Das Tierreich. Lief. 74, Berlin, 396 pp., 241 ff. The species described from the D o h r n collection BEIER, M. 1962. Orthoptera. Tettigoniidae (Pseudophyllinae I). only (its terra typica was unknown). Actually it is only In: Das Tierreich, Lief. 73. Berlin, 468 pp., 245 ff. a label which was placed before a specimen. BEIER, M. 1963. Tettigoniidae'. Subfam . Pseudophyllinae. In: Orthopterorum Catalogus, 5. ’s-Gravenhage, 246 pp.

B r u n n e r v o n W a t t e n w y l , C. 1895. Monographic der Pseudo­ Promeca quadripunctata BRUNNER VON WATTEN­ phylliden. Mit einem Atlas von zehn Tafeln. Wien, 282 pp. + WYL, 1895: 53 I-X tt. D o h r n , H. 1888. Uber einige merkwiidige Pseudophylliden. The species was described on a base of a material Entomologische Zeitung, Stettin, 49: 353-362, t. 2. E n d e r l e i n , G. 1917. Orthopterologica I. Neue neotropische from Java in the D o h r n collection (sex female), a number of specimens in the type series is unknown. Pseudophyllinen. Zoologischer Anzeiger, Leipzig, 49: 17-19. H e b a r d , M. 1922. Studies in Malyan, Melanesian and Australian B eie r (1962) cited only the specimen from the collec­ Tettigoniidae. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sci­ tion in Szczecin as a type. ences of Philadelphia, 74: 121-299. K a r s c h , F. 1891 a. Ueber die Orthopterenfamilie der Prochiliden. Entomologische Nachrichten, Berlin, 17, 7, pp. 97-107, ff. Lissophyllum intermedium B r u n n e r v o n W a t t e n ­ 1-4. w y l , 1895: 145 K a r s c h , F. 1891b. Orthopterologische Beitrage. IV. Beitragezur Systematik der Pseudophylliden Afrikas. Berliner entomo- The species described on a material from some logische Zeitschrift, Berlin, 36; 71-114, T. 2-4. collections (Madrid, Hamburg, Szczecin), but BEIER K i r b y , W. F. 1906. A synoptic catalogue of Orthoptera. — Orthoptera Saltatoria 1 Achetidae and Phasgonuridae. (1960) designated the specimen from the B o l iv a r collection as a type. He has synonimized L. London. VlG N O N , P. 1926. Esp&ces nouvelles dans le genre Typophyllum intermedium with Platyphyllum viridifollium (St. (Pterochrozees ). Rectfication systćmatique. Bulletin du F a r g e a u et S e r v il l e , 1825). Musćum national d’histoire naturelle, Paris, 32, pp. 207-210.

http://rcin.org.pl