Final Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final Report Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP) Final Report Project Number: DACA87-02-C-0014 Project Title: Non-Thermal, On-Site Decontamination and Destruction of Practice Bombs Date of Submittal: 12 June 2006 Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release, Distribution is Unlimited ESTCP/SERDP Contract No.: DACA72-02-C-0014 Non-Thermal, On-Site Decontamination and UXB International, Inc. Destruction of Practice Bombs Table of Contents 1 ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................... 1 2 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 2 2.1 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................. 2 2.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE DEMONSTRATION ............................................................................. 2 2.3 REGULATORY DRIVERS.................................................................................................... 3 2.4 STAKEHOLDER/END-USER ISSUES.................................................................................... 3 3 TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTION....................................................................................... 4 3.1 TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION ............................................................ 4 3.2 PREVIOUS TESTING OF THE TECHNOLOGY........................................................................ 7 3.2.1 Red Phosphorus....................................................................................................... 9 3.2.2 KC-4 Cartridges...................................................................................................... 9 3.2.3 BDU-33 Practice Bombs with Installed KC-4 Smoke Cartridges......................... 10 3.3 FACTORS AFFECTING COST AND PERFORMANCE............................................................ 10 3.4 ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS OF THE TECHNOLOGY ................................................ 11 4 DEMONSTRATION DESIGN .......................................................................................... 11 4.1 PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................... 11 4.2 SELECTING TEST SITE(S)................................................................................................ 12 4.3 TEST SITE HISTORY/CHARACTERISTICS ......................................................................... 12 4.4 PRESENT OPERATIONS.................................................................................................... 12 4.5 PRE-DEMONSTRATION TESTING AND ANALYSIS ............................................................ 13 4.6 TESTING AND EVALUATION PLAN .................................................................................. 13 4.6.1 Demonstration Set-Up and Start-Up..................................................................... 13 4.6.1.1 Mobilization ...................................................................................................... 13 4.6.1.1.1 Trailer Setup................................................................................................ 13 4.6.1.1.2 Supplies ....................................................................................................... 13 4.6.2 Period of Operation – Major Project Milestones ................................................. 14 4.6.3 Scope of Demonstration ........................................................................................ 14 4.6.4 Residuals Handling ............................................................................................... 14 4.6.5 Operating Parameters For The Technology ......................................................... 14 4.6.6 Demobilization ...................................................................................................... 16 4.7 SELECTION OF ANALYTICAL/TESTING METHODS........................................................... 16 4.8 SELECTION OF ANALYTICAL TESTING LABORATORY ..................................................... 17 5 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT.................................................................................... 17 5.1 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA ............................................................................................... 17 5.2 DATA ANALYSIS, INTERPRETATION, AND EVALUATION................................................. 18 6 COST ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................................ 20 i ESTCP/SERDP Contract No.: DACA72-02-C-0014 Non-Thermal, On-Site Decontamination and UXB International, Inc. Destruction of Practice Bombs 6.1 COST REPORTING ........................................................................................................... 20 6.2 COST ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................. 21 6.2.1 Cost Comparison................................................................................................... 22 6.2.2 Cost Basis.............................................................................................................. 22 6.2.3 Cost Drivers .......................................................................................................... 22 6.2.4 Life Cycle Costs..................................................................................................... 23 7 IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES.......................................................................................... 23 7.1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ........................................................................................ 23 7.2 OTHER REGULATORY ISSUES ......................................................................................... 23 7.3 END-USER ISSUES .......................................................................................................... 23 8 REFERENCES.................................................................................................................... 24 9 POINTS OF CONTACT .................................................................................................... 24 10 ATTACHMENTS ............................................................................................................... 26 List of Figures SM FIGURE 1: UXBASE MOBILE BDU TREATMENT UNIT (SEE ATTACHMENT 1) .............................. 5 FIGURE 2: PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM............................................................................................... 6 FIGURE 3: KC-4 CARTRIDGE: BEFORE AND AFTER....................................................................... 10 FIGURE 4: LOCATIONS OF THE SAMPLING POINTS ......................................................................... 16 FIGURE 5: EXAMPLE OF PROCESSED CARTRIDGE PROPELLANT RESIDUE LOCATION..................... 19 List of Tables TABLE 1: TEST RESULTS ................................................................................................................. 8 TABLE 2: PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES........................................................................................... 11 TABLE 3: SAMPLING POINTS AND FREQUENCIES ........................................................................... 15 TABLE 4: PERFORMANCE CRITERIA............................................................................................... 17 TABLE 5: PERFORMANCE CONFIRMATION METHODS .................................................................... 18 TABLE 7: COST TRACKING ............................................................................................................ 21 TABLE 6: POTENTIAL COST SAVINGS ............................................................................................ 22 ii ESTCP/SERDP Contract No.: DACA72-02-C-0014 Non-Thermal, On-Site Decontamination and UXB International, Inc. Destruction of Practice Bombs List of Appendices Appendix A: Analytical Methods Supporting Project Appendix B: Quality Control Plan Appendix C: Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan Appendix D: Test Results: Laboratory Tests of BDU-33 Practice Bombs with Installed KC-4 Smoke Cartridges Appendix E: Test Results for the Disposal of Neutralized Process Solutions List of Acronyms BDU Bomb Dummy Unit DOD Department of Defense EOD Explosive Ordnance Disposal SOP Standard Operating Procedure UXO Unexploded Ordnance iii ESTCP/SERDP Contract No.: DACA72-02-C-0014 Non-Thermal, On-Site Decontamination and UXB International, Inc. Destruction of Practice Bombs 1 Abstract The process was evaluated to determine required process variables. Following treatment the clean scrap was evaluated to determine its value. After neutralization, the liquid by-products were analyzed for explosive content, metals, and pH. During operations, gasses evolved were analyzed for hydrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and phosphine. Overall the process failed to achieve its objectives. The failure was due to the inability of the caustic fluid to penetrate certain blockages of some dropped, but still live, BDU’s so that the propellant was not always destroyed. The fact that propellant does remain in some cases means that inspection would be required to verify that the process has worked as intended for each and every BDU treated, which largely negates the projected cost savings from the process, and does not decrease the hazards associated with recycling
Recommended publications
  • WO 2017/048702 Al
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date W O 2017/048702 A l 2 3 March 2017 (23.03.2017) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every C07D 487/04 (2006.01) A61P 35/00 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, A61K 31/519 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, (21) International Application Number: DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, PCT/US20 16/05 1490 HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, (22) International Filing Date: KW, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, 13 September 2016 (13.09.201 6) MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, (25) Filing Language: English SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, (26) Publication Language: English TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (30) Priority Data: 62/218,493 14 September 2015 (14.09.2015) US (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every 62/218,486 14 September 2015 (14.09.2015) US kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, (71) Applicant: INFINITY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Platinum Metals Review
    VOLUME 55 NUMBER 3 JULY 2011 Platinum Metals Review www.platinummetalsreview.com E-ISSN 1471-0676 © Copyright 2011 Johnson Matthey Plc http://www.platinummetalsreview.com/ Platinum Metals Review is published by Johnson Matthey Plc, refi ner and fabricator of the precious metals and sole marketing agent for the six platinum group metals produced by Anglo American Platinum, South Africa. All rights are reserved. Material from this publication may be reproduced for personal use only but may not be offered for re-sale or incorporated into, reproduced on, or stored in any website, electronic retrieval system, or in any other publication, whether in hard copy or electronic form, without the prior written permission of Johnson Matthey. Any such copy shall retain all copyrights and other proprietary notices, and any disclaimer contained thereon, and must acknowledge Platinum Metals Review and Johnson Matthey as the source. No warranties, representations or undertakings of any kind are made in relation to any of the content of this publication including the accuracy, quality or fi tness for any purpose by any person or organisation. E-ISSN 1471-0676 • Platinum Metals Rev., 2011, 55, (3), 152• Platinum Metals Review A quarterly journal of research on the platinum group metals and of developments in their application in industry http://www.platinummetalsreview.com/ JULY 2011 VOL. 55 NO. 3 Contents The PGM 2011 Industrial Commercialization Competition 153 A guest editorial by Michael Joseph Carbon Nanotubes as Supports for Palladium and Bimetallic Catalysts 154 for Use in Hydrogenation Reactions By R. S. Oosthuizen and V. O. Nyamori 6th International Conference on Environmental Catalysis 170 A conference review by Noelia Cortes Felix 9th International Frumkin Symposium 175 A conference review by Alexey Danilov “Heterogenized Homogeneous Catalysts for Fine Chemicals 180 Production: Materials and Processes” A book review by Raghunath V.
    [Show full text]
  • The Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure Epa Method 1311
    Effective Date: 3/6/2009 Revision Date: 3/6/2009 Revision Authors: C. Selby, M. Thompson MT-004-4.11 THE TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE EPA METHOD 1311 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SCOPE AND APPLICATION 1 2. SUMMARY OF THE METHOD 1 3. APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT 2 4. REAGENTS AND CHEMICALS 2 5. SAMPLE COLLECTION, PRESERVATION, AND HANDLING 3 6. SAMPLE PREPARATION PROCEDURE 4 7. QUALITY CONTROL 14 8. SAFETY/HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT 14 9. REFERENCES 14 Appendices A. Maximum Concentration of Contaminants for Toxicity Characteristic B. Totals Thresholds for possible TCLP violations C. Appendix of Significant Changes 1. SCOPE AND APPLICATION 1.1. The toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) is designed to determine the mobility of both organic and inorganic analytes in liquid, solid, and multiphasic waste under conditions that simulate those found in a landfill. This SOP applies to TCLP for inorganic and organic analytes. 1.2. This method is applicable to soil, sediments and chemical waste. Samples are extracted according to EPA Method 1311 and for inorganic analyses the TCLP extract is digested in preparation for inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES), inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICPMS), or cold vapor atomic absorption spectroscopy (CVAAS, for mercury analysis). For organic analyses the TCLP extract goes through the organic extraction process in preparation for gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC/MS) or gas chromatography with electron capture detection (GC/ECD). 2. SUMMARY OF THE METHOD 2.1. The sample undergoes a preliminary evaluation, which may include determination of percent solids as well as particle size reduction. For samples with < 0.5% dry solids, the sample filtrate is defined as the extract.
    [Show full text]
  • Woolsey Fire Cleanup Sampling and Analysis Plan
    Woolsey Fire Cleanup Sampling and Analysis Plan Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area Paramount Ranch, Peter Strauss Ranch, Morrison Ranch, Rocky Oaks, Cooper Brown, Dragon Property, Miller Property, Arroyo Sequit, Circle X Ranch Prepared by Terraphase Engineering, Inc. 5/27/2020 Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area May 27, 2020 Page | i Signatories: [Federal Government Lead] [Signature] [Date Signed] [Cleanup Lead] [Signature] [Date Signed] [Legal Lead] [Signature] [Date Signed] [Regional Coordinator] [Signature] [Date Signed] [Contaminated Sites Program] [Signature] [Date Signed] By signing above, the signatories verify that they understand and concur with the information, procedures, and recommendations presented herein. Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area May 27, 2020 Page | ii Table of Contents List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables .......................................................................................................................................... v 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 CERCLA and National Park Service (NPS) Authority ................................................... 1-1 1.2 Purpose of Field Sampling...................................................................................................... 1-2 2 Site Description
    [Show full text]
  • Catalytic Hydroformylation Reactions in Liquid-Liquid Multiphase Systems with Polymer Particles and Without Phase Transfer Agents
    Catalytic Hydroformylation Reactions in Liquid-Liquid Multiphase Systems with Polymer Particles and without Phase Transfer Agents vorgelegt von M.Sc. Bachir Bibouche ORCID: 0000-0002-9611-5325 von der Fakultät II - Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften der Technischen Universität Berlin zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor der Naturwissenschaften Dr. rer. nat. genehmigte Dissertation Promotionsausschuss: Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Matthias Bickermann Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Dieter Vogt Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Reinhard Schomäcker Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Paul Kamer Tag der wissenschaftlichen Aussprache: 26.07.2019 Berlin 2019 Zusammenfassung Die Nutzung von molekularen Katalysatoren ermöglicht selektive und ressourcenschonende Reaktionen. Eine große Herausforderung dieser Katalysatoren ist jedoch die Wiederverwendbarkeit, da sie oft bei der Produktabtrennung inaktiv werden. Thema dieser Arbeit sind mehrphasige, flüssig-flüssig Systeme, in denen Reaktionen mit molekularen Katalysatoren durchgeführt werden, sowie deren Recyclingprozesse. In den verschiedenen Ansätzen ist immer eine wässrige Phase mit einem wasserlöslichen Katalysator vorhanden. Ziel ist, die gesamte wässrige Phase, inklusive Katalysator zu recyceln. Edukt und Produkt der Reaktion bilden eine unpolare Phase und können nach der Reaktion leicht abgetrennt werden. Der Erste Teil der Arbeit behandelt Polymerpartikel, welche in mehrphasigen, katalytischen Systemen als Phasentransferstoffe dienen und so die Reaktion ermöglichen. Die Charakterisierung der Partikel zeigt, dass sie reproduzierbar
    [Show full text]
  • November/December 2018 (.Pdf)
    inform November/December 2018 November/December inform International News on Fats, Oils, and Related Materials Volume 29 (10) Volume NATURAL ANTIOXIDANTS FOR MEAT ALSO INSIDE: Oilseeds in Sudan Plant protein in Latin America Gene-edited crops We team up with the most demanding Oils & Fats processors in the world COMPLETE PREPARATION PLANTS Innovative proprietary Technologies based on the experience of • 220+ Preparation Plants • 3,000+ Rosedowns Presses COMPLETE EXTRACTION PLANTS Reliable and unmatched Technologies based on the experience of • 900+ Extractors • 900+ Desolventiser Toasters (Dryer Coolers) • 700+ Distillations & Solvent Recovery Sections COMPLETE REFINING PLANTS State-of-the-Art refining Technologies based on the experience of • 700+ Oil pretreatment Processes • 900+ Bleaching Processes • 1,400 + Deodorizing Processes COMPLETE FAT MODIFICATION PLANTS High performance Technologies based on the experience of : Desmet Ballestra designed and • 100+ Full Hydrogenation Processes delivered the largest extraction plant • 80+ Interesterification Processes in the world, operating at 20,000 TPD • 400+ Fractionation Processes with unmatched effi ciency. Science behind Technology 3/7/17 9:37 AM US-Process-2017.indd 1 We team up with the most demanding Oils & Fats processors in the world COMPLETE PREPARATION PLANTS Innovative proprietary Technologies based on the experience of • 220+ Preparation Plants • 3,000+ Rosedowns Presses COMPLETE EXTRACTION PLANTS Reliable and unmatched Technologies based on the experience of • 900+ Extractors
    [Show full text]
  • Contract Lab Program
    EXHIBIT D INTRODUCTION TO ORGANIC ANALYTICAL METHODS D-1/Introduction SOM02.0 (04/2013) THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK SOM02.0 (04/2013) D-2/Introduction Exhibit D – Introduction to Organic Analytical Methods Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION......................................................... 5 2.0 ORGANIC METHODS FLOW CHART........................................... 5 3.0 GLASSWARE CLEANING................................................... 6 4.0 STANDARD STOCK SOLUTIONS............................................. 6 5.0 VERIFICATION OF AQUEOUS/WATER SAMPLE CONDITION....................... 6 6.0 SAMPLE CHARACTERIZATION.............................................. 6 7.0 SAMPLE MIXING........................................................ 7 8.0 SAMPLE DILUTIONS..................................................... 7 9.0 MANUAL INTEGRATIONS.................................................. 7 10.0 RAW DATA REQUIREMENTS................................................ 7 11.0 ANALYTICAL STANDARDS REQUIREMENTS.................................... 8 12.0 SAFETY............................................................... 9 13.0 POLLUTION PREVENTION................................................. 9 14.0 WASTE MANAGEMENT..................................................... 9 D-3/Introduction SOM02.0 (04/2013) THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK SOM02.0 (04/2013) D-4/Introduction Exhibit D – Sections 1-2 1.0 INTRODUCTION The organic analytical service provides a contractual framework for laboratories. This framework applies
    [Show full text]
  • Air Stripping Process for Organic Solvent Removal Pharmaceutical Process Unit Development
    Sofia da Silva Santos Rebocho Monteiro BSC in Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Air Stripping Process for Organic Solvent Removal Pharmaceutical Process Unit Development Master dissertation for diploma obtainment in Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Advisor: Doutor Mike Ugwoke, TEVA Co-advisor: Doutor Kambiz Farbod , TEVA Co-advisor: Prof. Doutor Mário Fernando José Eusébio, FCT-UNL Júri: President: Prof. Doutor Manuel Luís de Magalhães Nunes da Ponte Examiner: Prof. Doutora Isabel Maria Rôla Coelhoso Member: Prof. Doutor Mário Fernando José Eusébio March 2018 i ii Sofia da Silva Santos Rebocho Monteiro BSC in Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Air Stripping Process for Organic Solvent Removal Pharmaceutical Process Unit Development Master dissertation for diploma obtainment in Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Advisor: Dr. Mike Ugwoke, TEVA Co-advisor: Dr. Kambiz Farbod, TEVA Co-advisor: Prof. Doctor Mário Fernando José Eusébio, UNL-FCT Júri: President: Prof. Doctor Manuel Luís de Magalhães Nunes da Ponte Examiner: Prof. Doctor Isabel Maria Rôla Coelhoso Member: Prof. Doctor Mário Fernando José Eusébio iii iv Copyright Air Stripping Process for Organic Solvent Removal - Pharmaceutical Process Unit Development Copyright © Sofia da Silva Santos Rebocho Monteiro, da Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologias, Universidade Nova de Lisboa. A Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia e a Universidade Nova de Lisboa tem o direito, perpétuo e sem limites geográficos, de arquivar e publicar esta dissertação através de exemplares impressos reproduzidos em papel ou de forma digital, ou por outro meio conhecido ou que venha a ser inventado, e de a divulgar através de repositórios científicos e de admitir a sua cópia e distibuição com objetivos educacionais ou de investigação, não comerciais, desde que seja dado crédito ao autor e editor.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT ROH, SANGCHUL. Design of Novel Functional
    ABSTRACT ROH, SANGCHUL. Design of Novel Functional Colloidal Suspensions and Gels by Interfacial Engineering of Multiphasic Systems. (Under the direction of Dr. Orlin D. Velev). Polymeric materials are pervasive in many industrial products because of their simple processability, low cost, low density, excellent mechanical properties and decreased environmental impact. The morphology and functionality of polymeric materials need to be engineered for their use in industrial products. This dissertation describes application of the colloids and interface phenomena in multiphase systems to manufacture a few new classes of polymeric materials with unique morphologies and functionalities. Three categories of multiphase systems have been studied: 1) miscible liquid-liquid pair with immiscible solid, 2) immiscible liquid-liquid pair with immiscible solid particles and 3) liquid mixture inclusion in an immiscible and crosslinkable liquid medium. Chapter 2 describes the fabrication of a new class of soft dendritic colloids (SDCs or dendricolloids) on the basis of a miscible liquid-liquid pair with immiscible solid multiphase system. The multiphasic system utilizes polymer precipitation in turbulently sheared nonsolvent medium. In the turbulent medium, the polymer solution is randomly stretched and further templated by phase separation induced by solvent-nonsolvent exchange at the interface. This results in soft dendritic colloids which are hierarchically structured, with a big branched corona of nanofibers spreading out in all directions. The biomimetic similarity of their structure to the gecko lizards’ setae renders SDCs with excellent adhesion and cohesion properties. In Chapter 3, we describe the use of a similar multiphase system for the fabrication of a new class of soft mesoporous polymer nanosheets (MPNs).
    [Show full text]
  • Multiphase Bioreactor Design
    Multiphase Bioreactor Design Multiphase Bioreactor Design Edited by Joaquim M.S.Cabral Centre for Biological and Chemical Engineering Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon Portugal Manuel Mota Department of Biological Engineering University of Minho Portugal and Johannes Tramper Wageningen Agricultural University Food and Bioprocess Engineering Group The Netherlands London and New York First published 2001 by Taylor & Francis 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Taylor & Francis Inc, 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 Taylor & Francis is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. "To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge's collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk." © 2001 Taylor & Francis All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Every effort has been made to ensure that the advice and information in this book is true and accurate at the time of going to press. However, neither the publisher nor the authors can accept any legal responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions that may be made. In the case of drug administration, any medical procedure or the use of technical equipment mentioned within this book, you are strongly advised to consult the manufacturer’s guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • SFAM01.0 Exhibit D Introduction and General
    EXHIBIT D INTRODUCTION TO ANALYTICAL METHODS D-1/Introduction SFAM01.0 (05/2019) THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK SFAM01.0 (05/2019) D-2/Introduction Exhibit D – Introduction to Analytical Methods Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION...........................................................5 2.0 METHODS FLOW CHARTS....................................................5 3.0 GLASSWARE CLEANING.....................................................7 4.0 STANDARD STOCK SOLUTIONS...............................................7 5.0 VERIFICATION OF SAMPLE CONDITION AND PRESERVATION......................8 6.0 SAMPLE CHARACTERIZATION................................................9 7.0 SAMPLE DILUTIONS......................................................10 8.0 DISSOLVED METALS......................................................10 9.0 REPLICATE INTEGRATIONS/EXPOSURES......................................10 10.0 RAW DATA REQUIREMENTS.................................................11 11.0 ANALYTICAL STANDARDS REQUIREMENTS.....................................11 12.0 SAFETY................................................................12 13.0 POLLUTION PREVENTION..................................................13 14.0 WASTE MANAGEMENT......................................................13 D-3/Introduction SFAM01.0 (05/2019) THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK SFAM01.0 (05/2019) D-4/Introduction Exhibit D – Sections 1-2 1.0 INTRODUCTION This analytical service provides a contractual framework for laboratories. The framework applies the
    [Show full text]
  • Determinación De La Característica De Toxicidad Del Endosulfan Por Medio De La Técnica TCLP (Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure)
    Universidad de La Salle Ciencia Unisalle Ingeniería Ambiental y Sanitaria Facultad de Ingeniería 1-1-2009 Determinación de la característica de toxicidad del endosulfan por medio de la técnica TCLP (toxicity characteristic leaching procedure) Lida Carolina Niño Salamánca Universidad de La Salle, Bogotá Natalia Torres Chisino Universidad de La Salle, Bogotá Follow this and additional works at: https://ciencia.lasalle.edu.co/ing_ambiental_sanitaria Citación recomendada Niño Salamánca, L. C., & Torres Chisino, N. (2009). Determinación de la característica de toxicidad del endosulfan por medio de la técnica TCLP (toxicity characteristic leaching procedure). Retrieved from https://ciencia.lasalle.edu.co/ing_ambiental_sanitaria/49 This Trabajo de grado - Pregrado is brought to you for free and open access by the Facultad de Ingeniería at Ciencia Unisalle. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ingeniería Ambiental y Sanitaria by an authorized administrator of Ciencia Unisalle. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DETERMINACIÓN DE LA CARACTERÍSTICA DE TOXICIDAD DEL ENDOSULFAN POR MEDIO DE LA TÉCNICA TCLP (TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE) LIDA CAROLINA NIÑO SALAMANCA NATALIA TORRES CHISINO UNIVERSIDAD DE LA SALLÉ FACULTAD DE INGENIERÍA AMBIENTAL Y SANITARIA BOGOTÁ D.C. 2009 DETERMINACIÓN DE LA CARACTERÍSTICA DE TOXICIDAD DEL ENDOSULFAN POR MEDIO DE LA TÉCNICA TCLP (TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE) LIDA CAROLINA NIÑO SALAMANCA NATALIA TORRES CHISINO Trabajo de grado presentado para optar al Título de
    [Show full text]