DOCSLIB.ORG

Grand Antiprism and Quaternions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Grand Antiprism and Quaternions Grand Antiprism and Quaternions Mehmet Koca1, Mudhahir Al-Ajmi1, Nazife Ozdes Koca1 1Department of Physics, College of Science, Sultan Qaboos University, P. O. Box 36, Al-Khoud, 123 Muscat, Sultanate of Oman Email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Vertices of the 4-dimensional semi-regular polytope, the grand antiprism and its symmetry group of order 400 are represented in terms of quaternions with unit norm. It follows from the icosian representation of the E8 root system which decomposes into two copies of the root system of H4. The symmetry of the grand antiprism is a maximal subgroup of the Coxeter group W (H4). It is the group Aut(H2 H′ ) which is constructed in terms of 20 quaternionic roots ⊕ 2 of the Coxeter diagram H2 H2′ . The root system of H4 represented by the binary icosahedral group I ⊕of order 120, constitutes the regular 4D polytope 600-cell. When its 20 quaternionic vertices corresponding to the roots of the diagram H2 H2′ are removed from the vertices of the 600-cell the remaining 100 quaternions⊕ constitute the vertices of the grand antiprism. We give a detailed analysis of the construction of the cells of the grand antiprism in terms of quaternions. The dual polytope of the grand antiprism has been also constructed. 1 Introduction Six regular 4D polytopes and their semi-regular Archimedean polytopes are very interesting because their symmetries W (A4), W (B4), W (F4) and W (H4) can be represented with the use of finite subgroups of quaternions. There is a close correspondence between the finite subgroups of quaternions and the arXiv:0906.2117v2 [math-ph] 18 Aug 2009 symmetries of the above polytopes [1]. Some of them occur in high energy physics in model building either as a gauge symmetry like SU(5) [2] or as a little group SO(9) [3] of the M-theory. The Coxeter group W (H4) arises as the symmetry group of the polytope 600-cell, 3, 3, 5 [4], vertices of which can be represented by 120 quaternions of the binary{ icosahedral} group [5, 6]. The dual polytope 120-cell, 5, 3, 3 with 600 vertices, can be constructed from 600-cell in terms of quaternions.{ } Another observation is that they are all nested in the root system of E8 represented by icosians [7, 8]. 1 The grand antiprism was first constructed in 1965 by Conway and Guy [9] with a computer analysis. An antiprism is defined to be a polyhedron com- posed of two parallel copies of some particular n sided polygon,connected by an alternating band of triangles. In this paper− we study the symme- try group of the grand antiprism and construct its 100 vertices in terms of quaternions. We explicitly show how these vertices form 20 pentagonal an- tiprisms and 300 tetrahedra. We organize the paper as follows. In Section 2 we briefly discuss the correspondence between the root system of H4 and the quaternionic representation of the binary icosahedral group I and decompose it as 120=20+100 where first 20 quaternions represent the root system of the Coxeter diagram H2 H2′ and the remaining quaternions are the vertices of the grand antiprism⊕. The symmetry group of the grand antiprism turns out to be the group Aut(H2 H′ ) of order 400 which can be constructed ⊕ 2 directly from the quaternionic roots of the Coxeter diagram H2 H2′ . A simple technique has been employed in Section 3 for the construction⊕ of the cell structures of the grand antiprism. A projection of the grand antiprism into three dimensional space is discussed in Section 4. The dual polytope of the grand antiprism has been constructed in Section 5 where 320 vertices decompose as 320=20+200+100 under the group Aut(H2 H′ ) where 20 ⊕ 2 vertices are scaled copies of the root system of the Coxeter diagram H2 H′ ⊕ 2 lying on a sphere S3 with radius 1+√5 1.14 and 300 vertices lie on an 2√2 ≈ inner sphere S3 with a radius of unit length. Conclusion is given in Section 6 and an Appendix lists the decompositions of the vertices of the Archimedian W (H4) solids in terms of the orbits of Aut(H2 H′ ). ⊕ 2 2 Construction of the root system of H H′ 2 ⊕ 2 as the maximal subset of the root system of H4 and the vertices of the grand antiprism Let q = q0 + qiei, (i =1, 2, 3) be a real quaternion with its conjugate defined byq ¯ = q0 qiei where the quaternionic imaginary units satisfy the relations − eiej = δij + εijkek, (i, j, k =1, 2, 3). (1) − Here δijand εijk are the Kronecker and Levi-Civita symbols respectively and summation over the repeated indices is implicit. Quaternions generate the four dimensional Euclidean space where the quaternionic scalar product is defined by 2 1 1 (p, q)= (¯pq +¯qp)= (pq¯ + qp¯). (2) 2 2 The imaginary quaternionic units ei can be related to the Pauli matrices σi by ei = iσi and the unit quaternion is represented by 2 2 unit matrix. This correspondence− proves that the group of quaternions× is isomorphic to SU(2) which is a double cover of the proper rotation group SO(3). The root system of the Coxeter diagram H4 can be represented by the quaternionic elements of the binary icosahedral group I [10] which are given as the set of conjugacy classes in Table 1. The sets of conjugacy classes are indeed the orbits of the Coxeter group W (H3)= [p, p¯] [p, p¯]∗, p I (3) { ⊕ ∈ } where we use the notation [8] [a, b]: q aqb and [a, b]∗: q aqb.¯ (4) → → Table 1: Conjugacy classes of the binary icosahedral group I represented by quaternions for the cases of 1 being fixed. (Sets of conjugacy classes of N elements fixing the elements q are denoted as N(q) where additional subscripts are used to distinguish different sets of the same type.) Orders of elements The sets N(1) of the conjugacy classes denoted with N elements 1 1 2 1 − 1 1 10 12(1)+ : 2 (τ e1 σe3), 2 (τ e2 σe1), 1 ± ± ± ± 2 (τ e3 σe2) 1 ± ± 1 5 12(1) : 2 ( τ e1 σe3), 2 ( τ e2 σe1), − 1 − ± ± − ± ± 2 ( τ e3 σe2) 1 − ± ± 1 10 12(1)+′ : 2 (σ e1 τe2), 2 (σ e2 τe3), 1 ± ± ± ± 2 (σ e3 τe1) 1 ± ± 1 5 12(1)′ : 2 ( σ e1 τe2), 2 ( σ e2 τe3), − 1 − ± ± − ± ± 2 ( σ e3 τe1) 1 − ± ± 1 6 20(1)+ : 2 (1 e1 e2 e3), 2 (1 τe1 σe2), 1 ± ± ± 1 ± ± 2 (1 τe2 σe3), 2 (1 τe3 σe1) 1 ± ± ±1 ± 3 20(1) : 2 ( 1 e1 e2 e3), 2 ( 1 τe1 σe2), − 1 − ± ± ± 1 − ± ± 2 ( 1 τe2 σe3), 2 ( 1 τe3 σe1) − ± ± 1 − ± ± 4 30(1) : e1, e2, e3, 2 ( σe1 τe2 e3), ±1 ± ± ± 1 ± ± ( σe2 τe3 e1), ( σe3 τe1 e2) 2 ± ± ± 2 ± ± ± 3 1+√5 1 √5 2 In Table 1 τ = 2 , σ= −2 and they satisfy the relations τ = τ + 1, σ2 = σ +1, τ+σ=1, τσ= 1. The notation # (1) denote the set of ele- ments of the conjugacy classes which− also represent the orbits of the Coxeter group W (H3) fixing the element 1. 1 5 Let b = (τ + σe1 + e2) 12(1)+ and b = 1 represent the two simple 2 ∈ − roots of the Coxeter group H2 with unit norm. Then the quaternions e3b = 1 5 ( e1 + σe2 + τe3) and e3b = e3 represent the simple roots of the Coxeter 2 − − diagram H′ orthogonal to the roots of H2. The Coxeter diagram of H2 H′ 2 ⊕ 2 with its simple roots are depicted in Figure 1. The reflection generators at these simple roots are given by [11] [b, b]∗, [1, 1]∗, [e3b, e3b]∗, [e3, e3]∗. (5) − − − − These generators will lead to the following 20 quaternionic roots of the Cox- eter diagram H2 H′ ⊕ 2 m m H2 H′ = b , e3b , (m =0, 1, ..., 9). (6) ⊕ 2 { } This set of quaternions form a maximal subgroup, the dicyclic group of order 20, in the binary icosahedral group I [4]. The generators in (5) generate the group W (H2) W (H′ ), each of which, is a dihedral group of order 10. × 2 It is more appropriate to represent each dihedral group with one rotation generator and one reflection generator which can be written as W (H2)= [b, b], [1, 1]∗ ; W (H′ )= [¯b, b], [e3, e3]∗ . (7) { − } 2 { − } The direct product group is of order 100. One may simply note that the generator [e3, 1] or [1, e3] permutes the simple roots of H2 H′ . Actually ⊕ 2 these generators leave the Cartan matrix of the diagram H2 H′ invariant. ⊕ 2 Without loss of generality we take the generator [e3, 1] as the new generator which generates the cyclic group C4 of order 4. The group C4 is the normalizer of the group W (H2) W (H′ ) in the Coxeter group W (H4). An extension of × 2 the group W (H2) W (H′ ) by the group C4 is a semi-direct product of the × 2 two groups which is the group Aut(H2 H′ ) W (H2) W (H′ ) : C4 (8) ⊕ 2 ≈{ × 2 } ⊕ ′ ′ α1 = b α2 = −1 α1 = e3b α2 = −e3 Figure 1: Coxeter diagram of H2 H′ with quaternionic simple roots. ⊕ 2 4 of order 400 and is one of the five maximal subgroups of the Coxeter group W (H4) [11]. The group elements now can be written more concisely as Aut(H2 H′ )= [p, q] [p, q]∗; p, q (H2 H′ ) . (9) ⊕ 2 { ⊕ ∈ ⊕ 2 } It is represented by the pairs of quaternions taking values from the root sys- tem of the Coxeter diagram H2 H2′ .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Symmetry of Fulleroids Stanislav Jendrol’, František Kardoš
    Symmetry of Fulleroids Stanislav Jendrol’, František Kardoš To cite this version: Stanislav Jendrol’, František Kardoš. Symmetry of Fulleroids. Klaus D. Sattler. Handbook of Nanophysics: Clusters and Fullerenes, CRC Press, pp.28-1 - 28-13, 2010, 9781420075557. hal- 00966781 HAL Id: hal-00966781 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00966781 Submitted on 27 Mar 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Symmetry of Fulleroids Stanislav Jendrol’ and Frantiˇsek Kardoˇs Institute of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, P. J. Saf´arikˇ University, Koˇsice Jesenn´a5, 041 54 Koˇsice, Slovakia +421 908 175 621; +421 904 321 185 [email protected]; [email protected] Contents 1 Symmetry of Fulleroids 2 1.1 Convexpolyhedraandplanargraphs . .... 3 1.2 Polyhedral symmetries and graph automorphisms . ........ 4 1.3 Pointsymmetrygroups. 5 1.4 Localrestrictions ............................... .. 10 1.5 Symmetryoffullerenes . .. 11 1.6 Icosahedralfulleroids . .... 12 1.7 Subgroups of Ih ................................. 15 1.8 Fulleroids with multi-pentagonal faces . ......... 16 1.9 Fulleroids with octahedral, prismatic, or pyramidal symmetry ........ 19 1.10 (5, 7)-fulleroids .................................. 20 1 Chapter 1 Symmetry of Fulleroids One of the important features of the structure of molecules is the presence of symmetry elements.
    [Show full text]
  • Uniform Polychora
    BRIDGES Mathematical Connections in Art, Music, and Science Uniform Polychora Jonathan Bowers 11448 Lori Ln Tyler, TX 75709 E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Like polyhedra, polychora are beautiful aesthetic structures - with one difference - polychora are four dimensional. Although they are beyond human comprehension to visualize, one can look at various projections or cross sections which are three dimensional and usually very intricate, these make outstanding pieces of art both in model form or in computer graphics. Polygons and polyhedra have been known since ancient times, but little study has gone into the next dimension - until recently. Definitions A polychoron is basically a four dimensional "polyhedron" in the same since that a polyhedron is a three dimensional "polygon". To be more precise - a polychoron is a 4-dimensional "solid" bounded by cells with the following criteria: 1) each cell is adjacent to only one other cell for each face, 2) no subset of cells fits criteria 1, 3) no two adjacent cells are corealmic. If criteria 1 fails, then the figure is degenerate. The word "polychoron" was invented by George Olshevsky with the following construction: poly = many and choron = rooms or cells. A polytope (polyhedron, polychoron, etc.) is uniform if it is vertex transitive and it's facets are uniform (a uniform polygon is a regular polygon). Degenerate figures can also be uniform under the same conditions. A vertex figure is the figure representing the shape and "solid" angle of the vertices, ex: the vertex figure of a cube is a triangle with edge length of the square root of 2.
    [Show full text]
  • E8 Physics and Quasicrystals Icosidodecahedron and Rhombic Triacontahedron Vixra 1301.0150 Frank Dodd (Tony) Smith Jr
    E8 Physics and Quasicrystals Icosidodecahedron and Rhombic Triacontahedron vixra 1301.0150 Frank Dodd (Tony) Smith Jr. - 2013 The E8 Physics Model (viXra 1108.0027) is based on the Lie Algebra E8. 240 E8 vertices = 112 D8 vertices + 128 D8 half-spinors where D8 is the bivector Lie Algebra of the Real Clifford Algebra Cl(16) = Cl(8)xCl(8). 112 D8 vertices = (24 D4 + 24 D4) = 48 vertices from the D4xD4 subalgebra of D8 plus 64 = 8x8 vertices from the coset space D8 / D4xD4. 128 D8 half-spinor vertices = 64 ++half-half-spinors + 64 --half-half-spinors. An 8-dim Octonionic Spacetime comes from the Cl(8) factors of Cl(16) and a 4+4 = 8-dim Kaluza-Klein M4 x CP2 Spacetime emerges due to the freezing out of a preferred Quaternionic Subspace. Interpreting World-Lines as Strings leads to 26-dim Bosonic String Theory in which 10 dimensions reduce to 4-dim CP2 and a 6-dim Conformal Spacetime from which 4-dim M4 Physical Spacetime emerges. Although the high-dimensional E8 structures are fundamental to the E8 Physics Model it may be useful to see the structures from the point of view of the familiar 3-dim Space where we live. To do that, start by looking the the E8 Root Vector lattice. Algebraically, an E8 lattice corresponds to an Octonion Integral Domain. There are 7 Independent E8 Lattice Octonion Integral Domains corresponding to the 7 Octonion Imaginaries, as described by H. S. M. Coxeter in "Integral Cayley Numbers" (Duke Math. J. 13 (1946) 561-578 and in "Regular and Semi-Regular Polytopes III" (Math.
    [Show full text]
  • Platonic Solids Generate Their Four-Dimensional Analogues
    1 Platonic solids generate their four-dimensional analogues PIERRE-PHILIPPE DECHANT a;b;c* aInstitute for Particle Physics Phenomenology, Ogden Centre for Fundamental Physics, Department of Physics, University of Durham, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom, bPhysics Department, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1604, United States, and cMathematics Department, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5GG, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected] Polytopes; Platonic Solids; 4-dimensional geometry; Clifford algebras; Spinors; Coxeter groups; Root systems; Quaternions; Representations; Symmetries; Trinities; McKay correspondence Abstract In this paper, we show how regular convex 4-polytopes – the analogues of the Platonic solids in four dimensions – can be constructed from three-dimensional considerations concerning the Platonic solids alone. Via the Cartan-Dieudonne´ theorem, the reflective symmetries of the arXiv:1307.6768v1 [math-ph] 25 Jul 2013 Platonic solids generate rotations. In a Clifford algebra framework, the space of spinors gen- erating such three-dimensional rotations has a natural four-dimensional Euclidean structure. The spinors arising from the Platonic Solids can thus in turn be interpreted as vertices in four- dimensional space, giving a simple construction of the 4D polytopes 16-cell, 24-cell, the F4 root system and the 600-cell. In particular, these polytopes have ‘mysterious’ symmetries, that are almost trivial when seen from the three-dimensional spinorial point of view. In fact, all these induced polytopes are also known to be root systems and thus generate rank-4 Coxeter PREPRINT: Acta Crystallographica Section A A Journal of the International Union of Crystallography 2 groups, which can be shown to be a general property of the spinor construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Archimedean Solids
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln MAT Exam Expository Papers Math in the Middle Institute Partnership 7-2008 Archimedean Solids Anna Anderson University of Nebraska-Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/mathmidexppap Part of the Science and Mathematics Education Commons Anderson, Anna, "Archimedean Solids" (2008). MAT Exam Expository Papers. 4. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/mathmidexppap/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Math in the Middle Institute Partnership at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in MAT Exam Expository Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Archimedean Solids Anna Anderson In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts in Teaching with a Specialization in the Teaching of Middle Level Mathematics in the Department of Mathematics. Jim Lewis, Advisor July 2008 2 Archimedean Solids A polygon is a simple, closed, planar figure with sides formed by joining line segments, where each line segment intersects exactly two others. If all of the sides have the same length and all of the angles are congruent, the polygon is called regular. The sum of the angles of a regular polygon with n sides, where n is 3 or more, is 180° x (n – 2) degrees. If a regular polygon were connected with other regular polygons in three dimensional space, a polyhedron could be created. In geometry, a polyhedron is a three- dimensional solid which consists of a collection of polygons joined at their edges. The word polyhedron is derived from the Greek word poly (many) and the Indo-European term hedron (seat).
    [Show full text]
  • The View from Six Dimensions
    Walls and Bridges The view from Six Dimensiosn Wendy Y. Krieger [email protected] ∗ January, Abstract Walls divide, bridges unite. This idea is applied to devising a vocabulary suited for the study of higher dimensions. Points are connected, solids divided. In higher dimensions, there are many more products and concepts visible. The four polytope products (prism, tegum, pyramid and comb), lacing and semiate figures, laminates are all discussed. Many of these become distinct in four to six dimensions. Walls and Bridges Consider a knife. Its main action is to divide solids into pieces. This is done by a sweeping action, although the presence of solid materials might make the sweep a little less graceful. What might a knife look like in four dimensions. A knife would sweep a three-dimensional space, and thus the blade is two-dimensional. The purpose of the knife is to divide, and therefore its dimension is fixed by what it divides. Walls divide, bridges unite. When things are thought about in the higher dimensions, the dividing or uniting nature of it is more important than its innate dimensionality. A six-dimensional blade has four dimensions, since its sweep must make five dimensions. There are many idioms that suggest the role of an edge or line is to divide. This most often hap pens when the referent dimension is the two-dimensional ground, but the edge of a knife makes for a three-dimensional referent. A line in the sand, a deadline, and to the edge, all suggest boundaries of two-dimensional areas, where the line or edge divides.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics of Atomic Orbital Hybridization of Coordination Polyhedra: Role of F Orbitals
    molecules Article Systematics of Atomic Orbital Hybridization of Coordination Polyhedra: Role of f Orbitals R. Bruce King Department of Chemistry, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA; [email protected] Academic Editor: Vito Lippolis Received: 4 June 2020; Accepted: 29 June 2020; Published: 8 July 2020 Abstract: The combination of atomic orbitals to form hybrid orbitals of special symmetries can be related to the individual orbital polynomials. Using this approach, 8-orbital cubic hybridization can be shown to be sp3d3f requiring an f orbital, and 12-orbital hexagonal prismatic hybridization can be shown to be sp3d5f2g requiring a g orbital. The twists to convert a cube to a square antiprism and a hexagonal prism to a hexagonal antiprism eliminate the need for the highest nodality orbitals in the resulting hybrids. A trigonal twist of an Oh octahedron into a D3h trigonal prism can involve a gradual change of the pair of d orbitals in the corresponding sp3d2 hybrids. A similar trigonal twist of an Oh cuboctahedron into a D3h anticuboctahedron can likewise involve a gradual change in the three f orbitals in the corresponding sp3d5f3 hybrids. Keywords: coordination polyhedra; hybridization; atomic orbitals; f-block elements 1. Introduction In a series of papers in the 1990s, the author focused on the most favorable coordination polyhedra for sp3dn hybrids, such as those found in transition metal complexes. Such studies included an investigation of distortions from ideal symmetries in relatively symmetrical systems with molecular orbital degeneracies [1] In the ensuing quarter century, interest in actinide chemistry has generated an increasing interest in the involvement of f orbitals in coordination chemistry [2–7].
    [Show full text]
  • Construction of Great Icosidodecahedron This Paper
    Construction of Great IcosiDodecahedron This paper describes how to create the Great Icosidodecahedron analytically as a 3D object. This uniform polyhedron is particularly beautiful and can be constructed with 12 pentagrams and 20 equilateral triangles. You start with a pentagon and create the net for a Icosidodecahedron without the triangles (fig 1). Extend the sides of the pentagons to create pentagrams and fold the sides into the same planes as the icosidodecahedron and you get the first half of the polyhedron (fig 2). Now for the equilateral triangles. Pick every combination of two pentagrams where a single vertex shares a common point (fig 3). Create two equilateral triangles connecting the common vertex and each of the legs of the two pentagrams. Do this to for all pentagrams and you will come up with 20 distinct intersecting triangles. The final result is in figure 4. We can create the model using a second method. Based on the geometry of the existing model, create a single cup (fig 5). Add the adjoining pentagram star (fig 6). Now take this shape and rotate- duplicate for each plane of the pentagon icosidodecahedron and you get the model of figure 4. 1 Construction of Great IcosiDodecahedron fig1 The net for the Icosidodecahedron without the triangle faces. I start with a pentagon, triangulate it with an extra point in the center. 2 Construction of Great IcosiDodecahedron fig 2 Extend the sides of the pentagons to make pentagrams then fold the net into the same planes as the Icosidodecahedron. This makes 12 intersecting stars (pentagrams). fig 3 Now add equilateral triangles to each pair of pentagrams, which touch in only one vertex.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 – Symmetry of Molecules – P. 1
    Chapter 1 – Symmetry of Molecules – p. 1 - 1. Symmetry of Molecules 1.1 Symmetry Elements · Symmetry operation: Operation that transforms a molecule to an equivalent position and orientation, i.e. after the operation every point of the molecule is coincident with an equivalent point. · Symmetry element: Geometrical entity (line, plane or point) which respect to which one or more symmetry operations can be carried out. In molecules there are only four types of symmetry elements or operations: · Mirror planes: reflection with respect to plane; notation: s · Center of inversion: inversion of all atom positions with respect to inversion center, notation i · Proper axis: Rotation by 2p/n with respect to the axis, notation Cn · Improper axis: Rotation by 2p/n with respect to the axis, followed by reflection with respect to plane, perpendicular to axis, notation Sn Formally, this classification can be further simplified by expressing the inversion i as an improper rotation S2 and the reflection s as an improper rotation S1. Thus, the only symmetry elements in molecules are Cn and Sn. Important: Successive execution of two symmetry operation corresponds to another symmetry operation of the molecule. In order to make this statement a general rule, we require one more symmetry operation, the identity E. (1.1: Symmetry elements in CH4, successive execution of symmetry operations) 1.2. Systematic classification by symmetry groups According to their inherent symmetry elements, molecules can be classified systematically in so called symmetry groups. We use the so-called Schönfliess notation to name the groups, Chapter 1 – Symmetry of Molecules – p. 2 - which is the usual notation for molecules.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Every Face of a Polyhedron Have Many Sides ?
    Can Every Face of a Polyhedron Have Many Sides ? Branko Grünbaum Dedicated to Joe Malkevitch, an old friend and colleague, who was always partial to polyhedra Abstract. The simple question of the title has many different answers, depending on the kinds of faces we are willing to consider, on the types of polyhedra we admit, and on the symmetries we require. Known results and open problems about this topic are presented. The main classes of objects considered here are the following, listed in increasing generality: Faces: convex n-gons, starshaped n-gons, simple n-gons –– for n ≥ 3. Polyhedra (in Euclidean 3-dimensional space): convex polyhedra, starshaped polyhedra, acoptic polyhedra, polyhedra with selfintersections. Symmetry properties of polyhedra P: Isohedron –– all faces of P in one orbit under the group of symmetries of P; monohedron –– all faces of P are mutually congru- ent; ekahedron –– all faces have of P the same number of sides (eka –– Sanskrit for "one"). If the number of sides is k, we shall use (k)-isohedron, (k)-monohedron, and (k)- ekahedron, as appropriate. We shall first describe the results that either can be found in the literature, or ob- tained by slight modifications of these. Then we shall show how two systematic ap- proaches can be used to obtain results that are better –– although in some cases less visu- ally attractive than the old ones. There are many possible combinations of these classes of faces, polyhedra and symmetries, but considerable reductions in their number are possible; we start with one of these, which is well known even if it is hard to give specific references for precisely the assertion of Theorem 1.
    [Show full text]
  • In Boron Chemistry
    Bull. Mater. Sci., Vol. 22, No. 5, August 1999, pp. 863-867. © Indian Academy of Sciences. The ubiquitous icosahedral B12 in boron chemistry E D JEMMIS* and M M BALAKRISHNARAJAN School of Chemistry, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad500 046. India Abstract. Though boranes exhibit a wide variety of polyhedral structures, all the three polymorpbs of elemental boron essentially contain icosahedral Bn units as the predominant building block in their unit cell. Theoretical and experimental studies on boranes show that the icosuhedral arrangement leads to most stable boranes and borane anions. This paper attempts to explain the phenomenal stability associated with the icosahedral Bn structure. Using fragment molecular orbital theory, the remarkable stability of BI2Ht2~ among closo boranes are explained. The preferential selection icosahedral B12 unit by elemental boron is explained by improvising a contrived B84 sub-unit of the ~-rhombohedron, the most stable polymorph. This also leads to a novel covalent way of stuffing fnilerenes with icosahedral symmetry. Keywords. Boron; polyhedral closo borane dianions; icosahedral B12; ~-rhombohedral polymorph; orbital compatibility. 1. Introduction Elemental boron exists in three different polymorphic forms (Wells 1979). The thermodynamically most stable The chemistry of boron formed a vast discipline by itself [t-rhombohedral form has 105 boron atoms in its unit cell. and helped to alter the concept of structure and bonding The next stable ~-rhombohedral form has 12 boron atoms. radically (Lipscomb 1963). Starting from the famous The meta stable ~-tetragonal form has fifty boron atoms three-centre two-electron bond, many of the structural in its unit cell. The icosahedral BI2 unit is the primary features exhibited by boron compounds (most signifi- building block in all of these polymorphic forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Four-Dimensional Regular Polytopes
    faculty of science mathematics and applied and engineering mathematics Four-dimensional regular polytopes Bachelor’s Project Mathematics November 2020 Student: S.H.E. Kamps First supervisor: Prof.dr. J. Top Second assessor: P. Kiliçer, PhD Abstract Since Ancient times, Mathematicians have been interested in the study of convex, regular poly- hedra and their beautiful symmetries. These five polyhedra are also known as the Platonic Solids. In the 19th century, the four-dimensional analogues of the Platonic solids were described mathe- matically, adding one regular polytope to the collection with no analogue regular polyhedron. This thesis describes the six convex, regular polytopes in four-dimensional Euclidean space. The focus lies on deriving information about their cells, faces, edges and vertices. Besides that, the symmetry groups of the polytopes are touched upon. To better understand the notions of regularity and sym- metry in four dimensions, our journey begins in three-dimensional space. In this light, the thesis also works out the details of a proof of prof. dr. J. Top, showing there exist exactly five convex, regular polyhedra in three-dimensional space. Keywords: Regular convex 4-polytopes, Platonic solids, symmetry groups Acknowledgements I would like to thank prof. dr. J. Top for supervising this thesis online and adapting to the cir- cumstances of Covid-19. I also want to thank him for his patience, and all his useful comments in and outside my LATEX-file. Also many thanks to my second supervisor, dr. P. Kılıçer. Furthermore, I would like to thank Jeanne for all her hospitality and kindness to welcome me in her home during the process of writing this thesis.
    [Show full text]