DOCSLIB.ORG

Sustainable Transportation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sustainable Transportation Plan EMERYVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Agenda Date: March 24, 2011 Report Date: March 17, 2011 TO: Emeryville Planning Commission FROM: Diana Keena, Associate Planner Planning and Building Department SUBJECT: Draft Sustainable Transportation Plan LOCATION: Citywide PROJECT Study session to review a draft Sustainable Transportation Plan to DESCRIPTION: implement General Plan Transportation policies RELEVANT Goals T-G-3 multi-modal transportation, T-G-4 walkable city, T-G-5 GENERAL PLAN bicycle system, T-G-6 transit system, T-G-8 balanced parking supply, POLICIES: T-G-11 transportation demand management PROPOSAL The draft plan includes strategies to improve transit service, SUMMARY: transportation demand management, parking management, pedestrian and bicycle connectivity, and wayfinding. ENVIRONMENTAL This plan is covered by the Environmental Impact Report for the STATUS: General Plan that was certified by the City Council on October 13, 2009. BACKGROUND In 2007 the City Council approved a contract with Nelson\Nygaard for a comprehensive analysis of public transit improvements and incentives for non-vehicle forms of transportation and to develop an Alternative Transportation Plan. In 2008 the Council requested an analysis of traffic mitigation measures for four major development projects and a study of Horton Street and Emery Station West circulation. In 2009 Nelson/Nygaard conducted stakeholder interviews and completed an Existing Conditions Report and Needs Assessment. In 2010 the consultants presented draft strategies at an open house in May of 2010. City staff and the consultants have responded to public comments made at the open house, updated the existing conditions and checked for consistency with the 2009 General Plan to complete the draft plan. DISCUSSION The draft plan describes existing conditions, a summary of needs identified by stakeholders, sustainable transportation strategies, implementation, and funding. A list of recommended strategies is shown on page ES-6, in the Executive Summary. The plan recommends the following strategies: V.A. Planning Commission Staff Report Sustainable Transportation Plan Study Session March 24, 2011 Page 2 Transit: Emery Go-Round should establish a route over the railroad tracks, coordinate schedules with BART, post on 511.org, put AC Transit and Nextbus information on the map, expand and update displays, update signs, and improve data collection. AC Transit should extend service to downtown Berkeley and from 40th/San Pablo west. The City should improve the 40th/San Pablo bus hub, improve signal priority, consider bus-only lanes on Hollis, and study streetcar service. Transportation Demand Management: The City should expand casual carpool and car sharing, demonstrate employee bike sharing, and promote AC Transit Easy Pass. Retailers should consolidate delivery. Parking: The City should reduce parking maximums and establish minimums, incentivize in-lieu fees and shared parking, charge for public parking, implement an efficient parking permit program, establish parking benefit districts, unbundle parking, and require employers to cash out parking subsidies. Pedestrian Connectivity and Safety: The City should develop a street design manual, evaluate ability to maintain or enhance pedestrian facilities, review maintenance protocols, use online tools for reporting problems, repurpose underused right-of-way for pedestrian amenities, establish festive and safety programs, and build pedestrian-bicycle bridges over the railroad tracks and freeway. Bicycle Connectivity and Safety: The City should install bicycle boxes and advanced stop bars, install bicycle-only signal phases with actuators, expand public bicycle parking, establish bicycle stations, provide land use specific bicycle parking standards, improve signage and intersection crossings, reduce speed limits on bicycle boulevards and Class III routes, implement diverters and other traffic calming devices, and consider in the bicycle pedestrian plan ensuring that bicycle streets are safe, installing barrier separated bicycle lanes, coloring bike lanes, and establishing dedicated funding. Wayfinding: The City should install bicycle signs and markings consistent with neighboring cities, provide bus shelters with maps and displays, consider neighborhood walking maps for pedestrians, mark gateways, and continue signs across borders. Shopping center owners should build the image of retail centers. Staff seeks the Commission’s comments on the plan, especially the proposed strategies. The next step will be a City Council study session. Attachment: Draft Sustainable Transportation Plan FINAL REPORT MARCH 2011 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS AND TABLE OF FIGURES TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ ES-1 Study Overview ......................................................................................................................................... ES-1 Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................................................ ES-1 Demographics and Land Use .................................................................................................................... ES-2 Existing Transportation Network ............................................................................................................... ES-2 Transportation Priorities ............................................................................................................................ ES-4 Summary of Sustainable Transportation Strategies .................................................................................... ES-4 Chapter 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................1-1 Existing Travel Modes and Shift to Sustainable Transportation Modes ........................................................ 1-2 Study Process ............................................................................................................................................. 1-6 Report Organization .................................................................................................................................... 1-6 Chapter 2. Existing Conditions .................................................................................................2-1 Demographics and Land Use ...................................................................................................................... 2-1 Planning Context ......................................................................................................................................... 2-4 3-Ds of Travel Behavior .............................................................................................................................. 2-8 Circulation and Parking Network ............................................................................................................... 2-14 Existing Transit Services ........................................................................................................................... 2-22 Transportation Demand Management ....................................................................................................... 2-33 Chapter 3. Stakeholder Interviews and Summary of Needs .....................................................3-1 Stakeholder Interviews ................................................................................................................................ 3-1 Summary of Needs ..................................................................................................................................... 3-7 Chapter 4. Sustainable Transportation Strategies ...................................................................4-1 Transit Services ........................................................................................................................................... 4-2 Transportation Demand Management ........................................................................................................ 4-11 Parking Strategies ..................................................................................................................................... 4-22 Off-Street Parking Standards ..................................................................................................................... 4-24 Pedestrian Connectivity and Safety ........................................................................................................... 4-40 Bicycle Connectivity and Safety ................................................................................................................. 4-51 Wayfinding ................................................................................................................................................ 4-60 EMERYVILLE SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN • FINAL REPORT i Chapter 5. Implementation and Funding ..................................................................................5-1 Implementation Considerations ................................................................................................................... 5-1 Funding Considerations ............................................................................................................................... 5-1 Appendix A. street typology ...................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 3.1 Land Use & Housing
    3.1 Land Use and Housing This section presents the environmental setting and impact analysis on land use in the Emeryville General Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING PHYSICAL SETTING Land Use Evolution Before the colonization of the area by Spain in 1776, the Emeryville area was the site of extensive Native American settlements. Mudflats rich with clams and rocky areas with oysters, plus fishing, hunting, and acorns from the local oak trees, provided a rich and easily exploited food source for the residents. They would dispose of their clam and oyster shells in a single place, over time creating a huge mound—the Emeryville Shellmound. After settlement by Europeans, Emeryville became a city in its own right, largely through the efforts of businessman Joseph S. Emery who started a stonework contracting business in San Francisco. In 1859, Emery purchased a 185-acre tract of land north of Oakland and began to develop projects in the area. A community began to develop around the Emery Tract, and the town of Emeryville was officially incorporated in 1896, taking the name of its founder. In 1871 Emery financed the construction of the San Pablo Avenue Horse Cart Railroad, which connected Oakland to Emeryville. He was also one of the primary builders of the California- Nevada Railroad, which began in Oakland, crossed the burgeoning Emery Tract, and terminated in Orinda. Emeryville soon became a city of big industrial enterprises and rail terminals. Successive years saw further consolidation of industry, including the paint factory of Sherwin- Williams and Shell Development, the research arm of Shell Oil Company.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Information Rockridge Station Oakland
    B I R C H C T Transit N Transit Information For more detailed information about BART W E service, please see the BART schedule, BART system map, and other BART information displays in this station. S Claremont Middle Stops OAK GROVE AVE K Rockridge L School San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Schedule Information e ective February 11, 2019 Fares e ective May 26, 2018 A Transit (BART) rail service connects W 79 Drop-off Station the San Francisco Peninsula with See schedules posted throughout this station, or pick These prices include a 50¢ sur- 51B Drop-off 79 Map Key Oakland, Berkeley, Fremont, up a free schedule guide at a BART information kiosk. charge per trip for using magnetic E A quick reference guide to service hours from this stripe tickets. Riders using (Leave bus here to Walnut Creek, Dublin/Pleasanton, and T transfer to 51A) other cities in the East Bay, as well as San station is shown. Clipper® can avoid this surcharge. You Are Here Francisco International Airport (SFO) and U Oakland Oakland International Airport (OAK). Departing from Rockridge Station From Rockridge to: N (stations listed in alphabetical order) 3-Minute Walk 500ft/150m Weekday Saturday Sunday I M I L E S A V E Train Destination Station One Way Round Trip Radius First Last First Last First Last Fare Information e ective January 1, 2016 12th St. Oakland City Center 2.50 5.00 M H I G H W AY 2 4 511 Real-Time Departures Antioch 5:48a 12:49a 6:19a 12:49a 8:29a 12:49a 16th St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Third Crossing
    The Third Crossing A Megaproject in a Megaregion www.thirdcrossing.org Final Report, February 2017 Transportation Planning Studio Department of City and Regional Planning, University of California, Berkeley Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge the Department of City and Regional Planning (DCRP) at the College of Environmental Design (CED) at UC Berkeley, the University of California Transportation Center and Institute of Transportation Studies (ITS), UC Berkeley for support. A special thanks also goes to the helpful feedback from studio instructor Karen Trapenberg Frick and UC Berkeley faculty and researchers including Jesus Barajas and Jason Corburn. We also acknowledge the tremendous support and insights from colleagues at numerous public agencies and non-profit organizations throughout California. A very special thanks goes to David Ory, Michael Reilly, and Fletcher Foti of MTC for their gracious support in running regional travel and land use models, and to Professor Paul Waddell and Sam Blanchard of UrbanSim, Inc. for lending their resources and expertise in land use modeling. We also thank our classmates Joseph Poirier and Lee Reis; as well as David Eifler, Teresa Caldeira, Jennifer Wolch, Robert Cervero, Elizabeth Deakin, Malla Hadley, Leslie Huang and other colleagues at CED; and, Alexandre Bayen, Laura Melendy and Jeanne Marie Acceturo of ITS Berkeley. About Us We are a team of 15 graduate students in City Planning, Transportation Engineering, and Public Health. This project aims to facilitate a conversation about the future of transportation between the East Bay and San Francisco and in the larger Northern California megaregion. We are part of the Department of City and Regional Planning in the UC Berkeley College of Environmental Design, with support from the University of California Transportation Center and The Institute of Transportation Studies at the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16
    California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16 December 2005 California Department of Transportation ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor SUNNE WRIGHT McPEAK, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency WILL KEMPTON, Director California Department of Transportation JOSEPH TAVAGLIONE, Chair STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER JEREMIAH F. HALLISEY, Vice Chair GOVERNOR BOB BALGENORTH MARIAN BERGESON JOHN CHALKER JAMES C. GHIELMETTI ALLEN M. LAWRENCE R. K. LINDSEY ESTEBAN E. TORRES SENATOR TOM TORLAKSON, Ex Officio ASSEMBLYMEMBER JENNY OROPEZA, Ex Officio JOHN BARNA, Executive Director CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1120 N STREET, MS-52 P. 0 . BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, 94273-0001 FAX(916)653-2134 (916) 654-4245 http://www.catc.ca.gov December 29, 2005 Honorable Alan Lowenthal, Chairman Senate Transportation and Housing Committee State Capitol, Room 2209 Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Jenny Oropeza, Chair Assembly Transportation Committee 1020 N Street, Room 112 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear: Senator Lowenthal Assembly Member Oropeza: On behalf of the California Transportation Commission, I am transmitting to the Legislature the 10-year California State Rail Plan for FY 2005-06 through FY 2015-16 by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with the Commission's resolution (#G-05-11) giving advice and consent, as required by Section 14036 of the Government Code. The ten-year plan provides Caltrans' vision for intercity rail service. Caltrans'l0-year plan goals are to provide intercity rail as an alternative mode of transportation, promote congestion relief, improve air quality, better fuel efficiency, and improved land use practices. This year's Plan includes: standards for meeting those goals; sets priorities for increased revenues, increased capacity, reduced running times; and cost effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • 3405 Carshare Report
    Arlington Pilot Carshare Program FIRST-YEAR REPORT Arlington County Commuter Services (ACCS) Division of Transportation Department of Environmental Services April 15, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 1 INTRODUCTION . 3 What is Carsharing? . .3 Arlington: A Perfect Fit for Carsharing . 3 Two Carsharing Companies Operating in Arlington . 4 Arlington County Commuter Services (ACCS) . 4 ARLINGTON PILOT CARSHARING PROGRAM . 5 Public Private Partnership . .5 Program Goals . 5 Program Elements . 5 METHOD OF EVALUATION . 9 EVALUATION OF CARSHARE PILOT PROGRAM . 10 The Carshare Program Increased Availability, Membership and Use . 10 Arlington Carshare Members Trip Frequency and Purpose . 10 Arlington Carshare Members Rate Service Excellent . 11 Carsharing Members Feel Safer with Carshare Vehicles Parked On-Street . 11 Arlington Members More Confident Knowing Arlington is Carshare Partner . 12 Arlington Carsharing Members Reduce Vehicle-Miles Traveled (VMT) . 12 The Pilot Carsharing Program Encourages Transit-Oriented-Living . 13 Carsharing Provides Affordable Alternative to Car Ownership . 14 Arlington Carshare Members Reduce Car Ownership . 15 The Pilot Carshare Program Makes Efficient Use of Parking . 16 CONCLUSIONS . 17 EXTENDING AND EXPANDING SUCCESS . 18 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ARSHARING IS A SELF-SERVICE, SHORT-TERM CAR-RENTAL SERVICE that is growing in Europe and North America and has been available in the Cmetropolitan Washington region since 2001. Carsharing complements Arlington’s urban-village neighborhoods by providing car service on demand without the cost and hassles associated with car ownership. In March 2004, the Arlington County Commuter Services (ACCS) unit of the Department of Environmental Services partnered with the two carshare companies—Flexcar and Zipcar—to provide expanded carshare services and promotions called the Arlington Pilot Carshare Program.
    [Show full text]
  • ACT BART S Ites by Region.Csv TB1 TB6 TB4 TB2 TB3 TB5 TB7
    Services Transit Outreach Materials Distribution Light Rail Station Maintenance and Inspection Photography—Capture Metadata and GPS Marketing Follow-Up Programs Service Locations Dallas, Los Angeles, Minneapolis/Saint Paul San Francisco/Oakland Bay Area Our Customer Service Pledge Our pledge is to organize and act with precision to provide you with excellent customer service. We will do all this with all the joy that comes with the morning sun! “I slept and dreamed that life was joy. I awoke and saw that life was service. I acted and behold, service was joy. “Tagore Email: [email protected] Website: URBANMARKETINGCHANNELS.COM Urban Marketing Channel’s services to businesses and organizations in Atlanta, Dallas, San Francisco, Oakland and the Twin Cities metro areas since 1981 have allowed us to develop a specialty client base providing marketing outreach with a focus on transit systems. Some examples of our services include: • Neighborhood demographic analysis • Tailored response and mailing lists • Community event monitoring • Transit site management of information display cases and kiosks • Transit center rider alerts • Community notification of construction and route changes • On-Site Surveys • Enhance photo and list data with geocoding • Photographic services Visit our website (www.urbanmarketingchannels.com) Contact us at [email protected] 612-239-5391 Bay Area Transit Sites (includes BART and AC Transit.) Prepared by Urban Marketing Channels ACT BART S ites by Region.csv TB1 TB6 TB4 TB2 TB3 TB5 TB7 UnSANtit
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of E-Mobility in Carsharing Business Models
    Evolution of E-Mobility in Carsharing Business Models Susan A. Shaheen1 and Nelson D. Chan2 Transportation Sustainability Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Carsharing continues to grow worldwide as a powerful strategy to provide an alternative to solo driving. The viability of electric vehicles, or EVs, has been examined in various carsharing business models. Moreover, new technologies have given rise to electromobility, or e-mobility, systems. This paper discusses the evolution of e-mobility in carsharing business models and the challenges and opportunities that EVs present to carsharing operators around the world. Operators are now anticipating increased EV proliferation into vehicle fleets over the next 5- 10 years as technology, infrastructure, and public policy shift toward support of e- mobility systems. Thus, research is still needed to quantify impacts of EVs in changing travel behavior toward more sustainable transport. 1 Introduction Carsharing enables a group of members to share a vehicle fleet that is maintained, managed, and insured by a third-party organization. Primarily used for short-term trips, carsharing can provide affordable, self-service vehicle access 24-h per day for those who do not have a car, want to reduce the number of vehicles in their household, or do not use their vehicle during the day for long periods of time. Rates include fuel, insurance, and maintenance. Ideally, carsharing works best in a neighborhood, business, or campus setting where users could walk, bike, share rides, or take public transit to access the shared-use vehicles. Carsharing has evolved through several phases since the first carsharing system began in Europe in 1948.
    [Show full text]
  • 20-03 Residential Carshare Study for the New York Metropolitan Area
    Residential Carshare Study for the New York Metropolitan Area Final Report | Report Number 20-03 | February 2020 NYSERDA’s Promise to New Yorkers: NYSERDA provides resources, expertise, and objective information so New Yorkers can make confident, informed energy decisions. Mission Statement: Advance innovative energy solutions in ways that improve New York’s economy and environment. Vision Statement: Serve as a catalyst – advancing energy innovation, technology, and investment; transforming New York’s economy; and empowering people to choose clean and efficient energy as part of their everyday lives. Residential Carshare Study for the New York Metropolitan Area Final Report Prepared for: New York State Energy Research and Development Authority New York, NY Robyn Marquis, PhD Project Manager, Clean Transportation Prepared by: WXY Architecture + Urban Design New York, NY Adam Lubinsky, PhD, AICP Managing Principal Amina Hassen Associate Raphael Laude Urban Planner with Barretto Bay Strategies New York, NY Paul Lipson Principal Luis Torres Senior Consultant and Empire Clean Cities NYSERDA Report 20-03 NYSERDA Contract 114627 February 2020 Notice This report was prepared by WXY Architecture + Urban Design, Barretto Bay Strategies, and Empire Clean Cities in the course of performing work contracted for and sponsored by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (hereafter the "Sponsors"). The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the Sponsors or the State of New York, and reference to any specific product, service, process, or method does not constitute an implied or expressed recommendation or endorsement of it. Further, the Sponsors, the State of New York, and the contractor make no warranties or representations, expressed or implied, as to the fitness for particular purpose or merchantability of any product, apparatus, or service, or the usefulness, completeness, or accuracy of any processes, methods, or other information contained, described, disclosed, or referred to in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Station Profiles
    2015 BART Station Profile Study Station Profiles – Non-Home Origins STATION PROFILES – NON-HOME ORIGINS This section contains a summary sheet for selected BART stations, based on data from customers who travel to the station from non-home origins, like work, school, etc. The selected stations listed below have a sample size of at least 200 non-home origin trips: • 12th St. / Oakland City Center • Glen Park • 16th St. Mission • Hayward • 19th St. / Oakland • Lake Merritt • 24th St. Mission • MacArthur • Ashby • Millbrae • Balboa Park • Montgomery St. • Civic Center / UN Plaza • North Berkeley • Coliseum • Oakland International Airport (OAK) • Concord • Powell St. • Daly City • Rockridge • Downtown Berkeley • San Bruno • Dublin / Pleasanton • San Francisco International Airport (SFO) • Embarcadero • San Leandro • Fremont • Walnut Creek • Fruitvale • West Dublin / Pleasanton Maps for these stations are contained in separate PDF files at www.bart.gov/stationprofile. The maps depict non-home origin points of customers who use each station, and the points are color coded by mode of access. The points are weighted to reflect average weekday ridership at the station. For example, an origin point with a weight of seven will appear on the map as seven points, scattered around the actual point of origin. Note that the number of trips may appear underrepresented in cases where multiple trips originate at the same location. The following summary sheets contain basic information about each station’s weekday non-home origin trips, such as: • absolute number of entries and estimated non-home origin entries • access mode share • trip origin types • customer demographics. Additionally, the total number of car and bicycle parking spaces at each station are included for context.
    [Show full text]
  • Transbay Transit Center, San Francisco
    CITY OF LAGUNA NIGUEL GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN Transit-Oriented Development Case Studies Prepared for City of Laguna Niguel 27781 La Paz Road Laguna Niguel, California 92677 Prepared by PBS&J 12301 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 430 Los Angeles, California 90025 November 2007 Contents CASE STUDIES Introduction.................................................................................................................................1 CASE STUDY 1 Downtown Arlington Heights, Illinois......................................................................................3 CASE STUDY 2 Del Mar Station, Pasadena.....................................................................................................7 CASE STUDY 3 EmeryStation, Emeryville, CA............................................................................................... 11 CASE STUDY 4 North Hollywood Commercial Core ................................................................................... 17 CASE STUDY 5 Rail Station District, Santa Ana............................................................................................ 21 CASE STUDY 6 Grossmont Transit Station, La Mesa ................................................................................... 25 CASE STUDY 7 Pleasant Hill BART Transit Village ...................................................................................... 29 CASE STUDY 8 Rincon Hill Area Plan, San Francisco .................................................................................. 33 CASE STUDY 9 Transbay Transit
    [Show full text]
  • User Perspectives on Location Efficient Mortgages & Car Sharing
    2005-24 Final Report User Perspectives on Location Efficient Mortgages & Car Sharing Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. 3. Recipients Accession No. MN/RC – 2005-24 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date User Perspectives on Location Efficient Mortgages & Car Sharing June 2005 6. 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Kevin Krizek 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Project/Task/Work Unit No. Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs University of Minnesota 11. Contract (C) or Grant (G) No. 301 19th Avenue South (c) 81655 (wo) 50 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Minnesota Department of Transportation Final Report Research Services Section 395 John Ireland Boulevard Mail Stop 330 14. Sponsoring Agency Code St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 15. Supplementary Notes http://www.lrrb.org/PDF/200524.pdf 16. Abstract (Limit: 200 words) A burgeoning population seeking relatively affordable housing is placing high demands on outlying, auto-dependent residential markets. Simultaneously, public policies addressing housing, transportation, and land use aim to increase homeownership, decrease drive-alone travel, and harness outlying development. A relatively new mortgage lending procedure aims to address each of these public policy aims synergistically by allowing low- and moderate-income households the opportunity to purchase homes in transit-accessible neighborhoods that would otherwise be unobtainable because of cost. The goal of this research is to evaluate this initiative, as well as position it within the broader goals of smart growth, describe its application, and comment on its prospects. This report constitutes a primer of the current state of knowledge about these unique loan programs.
    [Show full text]
  • 5901 Christie Avenue | Emeryville, California
    5901 Christie Avenue | Emeryville, California FOR LEASE HOME HIGHLIGHTS FLOOR PLANS LOCATION Charlie Sweeney 555 12th Street, Suite 1400 +1 510 267 6021 Oakland, CA 94607 [email protected] main +1 510 465 8000 LIC #01987199 fax +1 510 465 1350 cushmanwakefield.com Cushman & Wakefield Copyright 2015. No warranty or representation, express or implied, is made to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein, and same is submitted subject to errors, omissions, change of price, rental or other conditions, withdrawal without notice, and to any special listing conditions imposed by the property owner(s). As applicable, we make no representation as to the condition of the property (or properties) in question. 5901 Christie Avenue Emeryville, CA HOME HIGHLIGHTS FLOOR PLANS LOCATION Property Highlights • Panoramic Bay Views • Mixture of Creative Office Space and Traditional Office Space • HVAC • Recent Interior and Exterior Improvements Amenities • Free on site parking • Freight and passenger elevators • Excellent Emeryville location, adjacent to the Public Market and walking distance to many restaurants, health & fitness facility and retail amenities • Immediate access to I-80/I-580 for convenient access to San Francisco, downtown Oakland and the East Bay thoroughfare • Property Management on-site • 24-7 Building Security and Tenant Access Available Suites Suite 208 | ±2,261 SF | $3.00 - $3.25 FSG 5901 Christie Avenue Emeryville, CA HOME HIGHLIGHTS FLOOR PLANS LOCATION 2nd Floor Plan Suite 208 | ±2,261 SF Highlights • 6 Private Offices • Large Conference Room • Kitchen Charlie Sweeney 555 12th Street, Suite 1400 +1 510 267 6021 Oakland, CA 94607 [email protected] main +1 510 465 8000 LIC #01987199 fax +1 510 465 1350 cushmanwakefield.com Cushman & Wakefield Copyright 2015.
    [Show full text]