Central Wisconsin Preliminary Food System Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Central Wisconsin Preliminary Food System Assessment Central Wisconsin Preliminary Food System Assessment Focusing on Marathon, Portage, Waupaca and Wood Counties May 6, 2015 Authors Kristy SeBlonka, Project Assistant, CLUE Anna Haines, Director and Professor, CLUE Special thanks to CLUE GIS Specialist Dan McFarlane for creating the maps in the report, and UW-Stevens Point student Cassandra Lund for completing the community initiatives table. Advisory Committee Sue Anderson, Farm to School Coordinator, Wood Meleesa Johnson, Solid Waste Director, Marathon County Health Department County Solid Waste Dave Barbier, Sustainability Coordinator, University of Ashley Kienitz, Public Health Educator, Marathon Wisconsin-Stevens Point County Health Department Barb Brewster, Community Programs Specialist, United Joel Kuehnhold, Agriculture Educator, Wisconsin States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rapids Public Schools, and Farmer, Lonely Oak Farm Ryan Brown, Director, Waupaca County Planning and Dennis Lawrence, Executive Director, North Central Zoning Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission Layne Cozzolino, Executive Director, Central Rivers Dan Marzu, Agriculture Development Educator, Farmshed Marathon County UW-Extension Rebecca Frisch, Director, Marathon County Kristie Rauter, Community Health Planner, Wood Conservation, Planning, and Zoning Department County Health Department Jason Grueneberg, Director, Wood County Planning Jenny Riggenbach, Chief Collaboration Officer, and Zoning Incourage Community Foundation Jill Hicks, Healthy Beginnings Program Administrator, Nathan Sandwick, Community Development Educator, Portage County UW-Extension, and Co-Chair, Hunger Portage County UW-Extension Poverty and Prevention Partnership of Portage County Karin Sieg, Executive Director, Recycling Connections Stephen Hittner, Owner, Family Natural Foods Sarah Wallace, Planner, Portage County Planning and Kristina Ingrouille, WIC Director, Waupaca County Zoning Health and Human Services Deb Jakubek, Membership Coordinator, Wisconsin Farmers Union Reviewers John Bauknecht, Corporate Attorney, UMOS Madelin Petz, Food Systems Education Outreach Amber Canto, Poverty and Food Security Specialist, Specialist, Wisconsin Center for Environmental UW-Extension Education Chris Holman, Farmer, Nami Moon Farm and Member, Becky Roberts, Land Use Specialist, Center for Land USDA Advisory Committee on Beginning Farmers and Use Education Ranchers Tara Turner, Turners Fresh Market and Wisconsin Food Sandy Liang, Family Living Educator, Waupaca County Hub Cooperative UW-Extension Ying Lee Xiong, Communications Specialist, Lynn Markham, Land Use Specialist, Center for Land Department of Agriculture, Trade, and Consumer Use Education Protection Michelle Miller, Associate Director, Center for Integrated Agricultural Systems Contents 1. Introduction...........................2 2. Regional Characteristics.......4 3. Food Production....................6 4. Food Processing.................16 5. Food Distribution.................20 6. Local Markets......................22 7. Health and Access..............28 8. Food Residuals...................34 9. Community Initiatives..........38 10. Conclusion........................39 11. Appendices........................40 1 Introduction The Central Wisconsin Food System Assessment is a project of the Center for Land Use Education (CLUE). CLUE works to create learning opportunities for communities to help them make sound land use decisions that result in a sustainable Wisconsin. CLUE is often asked to engage in food systems research and discussions, and has noticed a growing interest in assessment and planning in the central region. The food system includes a diverse range of farm and food businesses and community partners. A growing number of consumers are more interested in the social and environmental impacts of their food, often associated with local food.1 Definitions vary, but the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) describes local food as “produced, processed, and distributed within a particular geographic boundary that consumers associate with their own community.” A broader definition looks at the community food system, which can be defined as “one in which sustainable food production, processing, distribution and consumption are integrated to enhance the environmental, economic and social and nutritional health of a particular place.”2 There are many ways to approach a community food system assessment. This assessment includes four counties: Marathon, Portage, Waupaca and Wood. This region was selected based on regional markets and working relationships. Taking a regional approach can help to think about the economic issues around food systems, including where and how aggregation and distribution can occur. A regional approach also can highlight the commonalities in a region, which may help in marketing. The purpose of the assessment is to provide partners with a concise overview of the regional food system to inform future research and planning. Community Input CLUE asked representatives from the four counties to serve on an advisory committee to oversee the process and provide input on the report. CLUE’s suggested roles for committee members included: attending three meetings, sharing insights and data with CLUE, reviewing drafts of the report, and informing colleagues and partners about the report and using it as appropriate. We also asked select state experts to act as reviewers. Contents of the Report This report is organized into six sections: regional characteristics, food production, food processing, food distribution, local markets for food, community health and food access, and food residuals. The community initiatives section and related appendix includes existing organizations and initiatives related to food system work in the region. A conclusion provides a summary of the report and future assessment opportunities. How to Use This Report The assessment can be The assessment is an initial step to understanding what is going on in used in a number of the Central Wisconsin food system. As such, it provides a base from which communities can engage in future assessment, community and ways: for use in future regional planning and goal setting, grant writing, and other activities. The community and regional summary portion of each section includes future research options and discussion questions that communities can use to build a community-wide planning, in grant understanding of our food system. The report and figures are available for writing, and in other download on the CLUE website. See back cover for Web address. community activities. Data and Its Limitations For the preliminary assessment, the authors relied on secondary data, i.e., data collected by someone else. Many of the data sources are from the U.S. Census, such as the Decennial Census and County Business Patterns, and the USDA’s Census of Agriculture. The authors discuss some of the limitations of each source in each section. Other data was collected from organizations and partners. 1 Martinez, Steve, et al. May 2010. Local Food Systems: Concepts, Impacts, and Issues. USDA Economic Research Report 97. 2 Feenstra and Garrett. 1999. Growing a Community Food System. 2 For each figure, map and table, the authors provide an interpretation of the data and points of interest. Readers may see new patterns and interpretations from this data. History of the Region Each community’s food system is impacted by its history. This includes the geology, geography, and climate, cultural heritage, and agricultural experience within our region. The southern portions of Wood, Portage and Waupaca counties are part of the Central Plains. This area is flat and marshy. Acres of Wood and Portage Counties are covered in sandy soil from when Old Glacial Lake Wisconsin receded at the end of the last Ice Age. The northern parts of Wood, Portage and Waupaca counties, and all of Marathon County are part of the Northern Highlands. This area is characterized by rich cropland and heavy clay soil. The Wisconsin River, and broader Central Wisconsin River Basin, passes through Marathon, Portage and Wood counties. Waupaca County is home to the Waupaca Chain of Lakes and the Wolf River. Farming in the region relies heavily on groundwater resources through irrigation. The region draws groundwater from unconfined aquifers. Native Americans have hunted and farmed in Central Wisconsin for centuries. In 1836, tribal lands along the Wisconsin River were transferred to the US government in a treaty.3 European settlers increasingly came to the area to farm. When Wisconsin was founded in 1848, two out of three residents lived on a farm, and the average farm was less than 100 acres in size.4 The US Homestead Act of 1862 allowed settlers to claim 160 acres of land in Wisconsin.5 After the forested portions were logged, agriculture was expanded. Central Wisconsin had large settlements of German and Scandinavian immigrants, some of whom began dairy farming.6 The first Polish immigrants, primarily farmers, arrived in Portage County in the mid- 1850s and expanded into other areas. Some settled on land obtained through the Homestead Act. During this period, wheat was the main crop, but production in Central Wisconsin shifted to cranberry and produce by the latter half of the century. Industrialization, including the mechanization of agriculture, was occurring at the turn of the century. More people began moving off farms to work in the cities. Wetlands were also drained for agricultural purposes. For example, Portage County’s Buena Vista Marsh
Recommended publications
  • Chippewa County Farmland Preservation Plan
    Chippewa County Farmland Preservation Plan October, 2015 Prepared by: Chippewa County Department of Planning & Zoning Chippewa County Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................3 Working Lands Initiative ....................................................................................................................................4 Agricultural Enterprise Areas – (AEA) ..............................................................................................................4 Other Plans .................................................................................................................................................................4 Chippewa County Comprehensive Plan – July 2010 ..........................................................................................4 Chippewa County Land & Water Resource Plan ...............................................................................................5 Land Use Conditions and Trends ...............................................................................................................................5 Land Use .............................................................................................................................................................5 Population ...........................................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Kenosha County Intensive Survey Report
    Intensive Survey of Rural Kenosha County Including the towns of Somers, Paris, Brighton, Wheatland, and Randall By Legacy Architecture, Inc. 605 Erie Avenue, Suite 101 Sheboygan, Wisconsin 53081 For Wisconsin Historical Society State Historic Preservation Office 816 State Street Madison, Wisconsin 53706 2019 Acknowledgments The following persons or organizations assisted in completing this project: Legacy Architecture, Inc. Jennifer L. Lehrke, Principal Historic Preservation Consultant Kenosha County Historical Society & Rowan Davidson, Historic Preservation Consultant Kenosha History Center Robert Short, Historic Preservation Consultant Jonathan Martens, Exhibition & Collections Gail Biederwolf, Administrative Services Coordinator Specialist Wisconsin Historical Society Others State Historic Preservation Office Kathy Emery Daina Penkiunas, State Historic Preservation Officer Jackie Klapproth Peggy Veregin, National Register Coordinator Chris Kraidich Joseph R. DeRose, Survey & Registration Historian Rachel Muhlenbeck Amy Wyatt, Historic Preservation Specialist Callie Rucker Charles Soper Kenosha County Robin Therese Tom Beaudry, Information Technology Deborah Vos Andy Buehler, Director, Department of Planning & Development Ben Fiebelkorn, Senior Land Use Planner Patricia Pendleton, GIS Coordinator Scott Schutze, Director, County Land Information Office Cheryl Schroeder, Office of the Register of Deeds The activity that is the subject of this intensive survey report has been financed entirely with the Wisconsin State Historic Preservation
    [Show full text]
  • Fred L. Holmes a £
    1948-CENTENNIAL EDITION-1948 M1 'A V, FRED L. HOLMES A £ OLD WORLD WISCONSIN AROUND EUROPE IN THE BADGER STATE Other Books by FRED L. HOLMES “Abraham Lincoln Traveled This Way” “George Washington Traveled This Way” “Alluring Wisconsin” “Badgei Saints and Sinners” “The Voice of Trappist Silence” •• OLD WORLD WISCONSIN Around Europe Jn the Badger State BY FRED L. HOLMES ILLUSTRATED WITH PHOTOGRAPHS, AND SKETCHES BY MAX FERNEKES “We are what we are because we stand on the shoulders of those who have preceded us. May we so live that those who follow us may stand on our shoulders.” —Anon. COPYRICHT, 1944 FRED L. HOLMES All rights reserved including the right to reproduce this book or parts thereof in any form whatever. First printing, May, 1944 Second printing, September, 1944 TO LOUIS W. BRIDGMAN A CLASSMATE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN ALWAYS MY FRIEND WHOSE MANY SERVICES HAVE BEEN MOST HELPFUL 6 0 ea>. "7? »«•*• "ASIANS r_/?REN xmicm CM (l I swedes finns / . •toil ■*|HIK«TDH IMAMS /4»amti*wa« Russians 0 ICELANDERS A. V • 'MMIIC MiaoiT M«M vj T. SWEDES (ltC**U *Kll y • cuifo* f imiuu #«lM«i. OTjfx^xxt BELGIANS Russians FRENCH if* ••out "t • »IU»*9 ^ . udi*>H OANES ' 1 «IIUI«IUI BOHEMIANS 1 HOLLANDERS j HOLLANDERS GERMANS MAOIIOM • CORNISH « -T MOnt( OANES ) YANKEELAND V _ SERBIANS / MAP Of WISCONSIN SHOWING RACIAL GROUPS AND PRINCIPAL LOCALITIES WHERE THEIR SETTLEMENTS ARE LOCATED PREFACE Through many questionings and wanderings in my native state, I have formed an appreciation, beyond ordi¬ nary measure, of the people who are Wisconsin.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning for Agriculture in Wisconsin
    Planning for Agriculture in Wisconsin A Guide for Communities November 2002 Written By Douglas Jackson-Smith With the Assistance of: Paul Benjamin Richard Castlenuovo Gwen Garvey Carrie Hirsch Jonquil Johnston Lisa MacKinnon Steve Ventura Mike Wyatt Acknowledgements The authors of this Guide want to acknowledge the generous institutional and financial support for the project provided by the following organizations. Without their assistance, this guide would never have been possible. In addition, we benefited from the extensive editorial comments and suggestions from a wide range of reviewers. We specifically hope the guide provides a useful reference to communities that are developing comprehensive plans with strong agricultural elements. Contributing And Supporting Organizations University of Wisconsin Cooperative Extension Service University of Wisconsin-Madison Program on Agricultural Technology Studies College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Wisconsin Department of Administration Office of Land Information Services Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade, and Consumer Protection Farmland Preservation Program Wisconsin Farm Center USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service - Wisconsin Office Wisconsin Towns Association Wisconsin Farm Bureau Federation National Farmers Organization 1000 Friends of Wisconsin Wisconsin Historical Society Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources All photos courtesy of Zane Williams© for use by permission only © 2002 UW Cooperative Extension and Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade, and Consumer
    [Show full text]
  • FPP.06.10.2014.Draft
    Adopted on XXX X, 2014 Eau Claire Board of Supervisors Resolution #X (2014) Prepared by: Eau Claire County Department of Planning and Development West Central Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission Financial Assistance Provided by: Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Planning & Development Committee Gordon Steinhauer, Chair Gary Gibson, Vice Chair James Dunning Ray Henning Steve Chilson Farmland Preservation Steering Committee Barry Kostka Bob Paddock Watford Seguin, Jr. Noel Kroeplin Kristina Beuning Dan Lindeman Mike Weiss Jane Mueller Phillip Chute Dudley (Joe) Smith Pat Shaffer Dean Zimmerman Mary Price Duane Merritt Larry Zimmerman EAU CLAIRE COUNTY 18 56 Eau Claire County FARMLAND PRESERVATION PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................1 WHAT IS FARMLAND PRESERVATION?.................................................................2 WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE PROGRAM? ........................................................2 WHY IS IT IMPORTANT? ......................................................................................3 HISTORY OF THE FARMLAND PRESERVATION PROGRAM .............................................3 WISCONSIN WORKING LANDS INITIATIVE (WLI) ..........................................................5 PLANNING PROCESS ................................................................................................6 NATURAL RESOURCES .............................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Agriculture in Wisconsin by the Numbers
    2012 STATUS REPORT ORGANIC AGRICULTURE IN WISCONSIN BY THE NUMBERS Wisconsin has experienced dramatic growth in organic agriculture since the National Organic Program was enacted in 2002. The number of organic farms in Wisconsin grew 157 percent from 2002 to 2007.1 Wisconsin's growth in organic farming mirrors global and national growth in this sector. Organic production in the U.S. is a small but rapidly growing part of worldwide organic production. Globally, 87 million acres were farmed under organic management in 2008, representing almost 1.4 million producers in 154 countries. This represents a nine percent increase in the acreage in organic production over 2007.2 U.S. certified organic acreage reached more than 4.1 million acres and 14,540 producers in 2008.3 The National Agricultural Statistics Service collected in-depth 2008 data about organic agriculture in the U.S. as a follow up to the 2007 agricultural census.4 The survey included farms that were certified organic, transitioning to organic and exempt from certification.5 The 2008 USDA Organic Agriculture Census illustrates that Wisconsin has a well-rounded organic portfolio, ranking highly in number of farms and sales for a diverse range of agricultural products. Number of organic farms Top five states in number of organic farms The 2008 USDA Organic Agriculture Census ranks Wisconsin second in California 2,714 total number of organic farms (Figure 1). The census reports 2,714 organic Wisconsin 1,222 farms in California, which is the top- Washington 887 ranked state, and 1,222 organic farms in Wisconsin. New York 827 Wisconsin is also in the top five states for organic acreage, with a total of Oregon 657 195,603 acres.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Campus
    Agricultural Campus Cultural Landscape Inventory December 2005 (Revisions December 2011) Quinn Evans|Architects University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Landscape Architecture, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences Division of Facilities Planning and Management ©2011, Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System University of Wisconsin-Madison Cultural Landscape Inventory DEFINITIONS What is a “cultural landscape”? The following document is based on concepts and techniques developed by the National Park Service. The NPS has produced a series of manuals for identifying, describing, and maintaining culturally significant landscapes within the national park system.1 The National Park Service defines a cultural landscape as a geographic area, including both cultural and natural resources and the wildlife or domestic animals therein[,] associated with a historic event, activity, or person, or [one] that exhibits other cultural or aesthetic values.2 In 1925, geographer Carl Sauer (1889-1975) summarized the process that creates cultural landscapes: “Culture is the agent, the natural area is the medium, the cultural landscape the result.” 3 Similarly, the writer J. B. Jackson (1909-1996) looked upon the landscape as a composition of spaces made or modified by humans “to serve as infrastructure or background for our collective existence.”4 What is a “cultural landscape inventory”? 5 This cultural landscape inventory for the agricultural campus is one of eight such studies completed as part of the UW-Madison Cultural Landscape Resource Plan. Each inventory defines the boundaries of a distinct cultural landscape on campus, summarizes its history, describes its current condition, and makes recommendations about its treatment. In addition to these eight cultural landscape inventories, two companion documents address the archaeology and overall history of the campus.
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Agriculture in Wisconsin: 2017 Status Report
    ORGANIC AGRICULTURE IN WISCONSIN: 2017 STATUS REPORT Prepared by the UW-Madison Center for Integrated Agricultural Systems and the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection Authors: Lisa Bauer, Cris Carusi, Anders Gurda, Ruth McNair and Erin Silva February 2017 2017 STATUS REPORT i This report is a joint effort of: The Center for Integrated Agricultural Systems (CIAS) is a research center for sustainable agriculture in the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison. CIAS fosters multidisciplinary inquiry and supports a range of research, curriculum and program development projects. It brings together university faculty, farmers, policy makers and others to study relationships between farming practices, farm profitability, the environment and rural vitality. For more information, visit www.cias.wisc.edu or call 608-262-5200. The Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) works to make Wisconsin a world leader in agriculture, food safety and consumer protection. DATCP is responsible for food safety, animal and plant health, protecting water and soil, and monitoring fair and safe business practices. The DATCP Organic Agriculture Program is housed in the Division of Agricultural Development and provides individual technical assistance and education to organic farmers and those wishing to begin farming organically, as well as to businesses processing organic products. For more information, visit datcp.wi.gov or call 608-224-5095. The findings and policy recommendations in this resource are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection. Media contact: Cris Carusi, CIAS: [email protected] or 608-262-8018 Authors: Lisa Bauer, Cris Carusi, Anders Gurda, Ruth McNair and Erin Silva Publication design and layout by Ruth McNair, CIAS Editorial review provided by Kevin Kiehnau, Matt Nitz, Gene Schriefer and Steve Ventura This report is printed on recycled paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Wisconsin Agriculture
    Overview of Wisconsin Agriculture AAE 320: Farming Systems Management Paul Mitchell Learning Goals To become aware of 1. Major agricultural products Wisconsin farmers grow and their relative importance nationally 2. Economic impact of agriculture in Wisconsin 3. Current trends occurring among Wisconsin farms FARMER CASH RECEIPTS IN 2018 TOP 10 US STATES ($ BILLION) 50 40 WI $11.0 billion in 2018 30 20 10 0 Wisconsin is a Major Dairy State (2018) Dairy WI Rank % US #1 State Milk production 2 14.1 California Cheese, total 1 26.3 Wisconsin American 1 19.5 Wisconsin Cheddar 1 18.8 Wisconsin Hispanic 2 29.9 California Italian 1 31.1 Wisconsin Mozzarella 2 26.2 California Dry whey (food) 1 32.6 Wisconsin Wisconsin’s Place in US Agriculture (2018) Livestock WI Rank % US #1 State Cattle and calves 9 3.6 Texas Milk cows 2 13.6 California Hogs and Pigs 20 0.4 Iowa Sheep 20 1.4 Texas Milk Goats 1 16.7 Wisconsin Chickens 17 1.7 Iowa Broilers 20 0.6 Georgia Eggs 16 1.9 Iowa Mink Pelts 1 31.3 Wisconsin Honey 16 1.5 North Dakota Trout 6 1.0 Idaho Wisconsin’s Place in US Agriculture (2018) Grain/Feed Crops WI Rank % US #1 State Corn for grain 10 3.8 Iowa Corn for silage 1 11.0 Wisconsin Oats 4 9.8 North Dakota Soybeans 14 2.3 Illinois Wheat, winter 19 1.2 Kansas Forage (all types) 4 8.1 Texas Wisconsin’s Place in US Agriculture (2018) Vegetable Crops WI Rank % US #1 State Potatoes 3 6.0 Idaho Sweet Corn 3 13.1 Washington Green Peas 3 19.3 Washington Snap Beans 1 37.5 Wisconsin Carrots 3 5.2 California Cabbage 6 6.9 California Cucumber 7 4.0 Florida Pumpkins
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Agriculture in Wisconsin: a Survey and Discussion of Land Use and Planning Practices in High Density Counties
    URBAN AGRICULTURE IN WISCONSIN: A SURVEY AND DISCUSSION OF LAND USE AND PLANNING PRACTICES IN HIGH DENSITY COUNTIES Tim Kuhn, J.D. Candidate, University of Wisconsin Law School for Family Farm Defenders of Madison, Wisconsin December 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction [need more Wisconsin stuff in the intro].......................................... 1 II. What is urban agriculture, and why is it important?............................................ 2 a. Breaking down traditional conceptions. ................................................................. 2 b. The Possibilities. ..................................................................................................... 3 c. The Problems we face. ............................................................................................ 5 III. Land Use Tools that can support Urban Agriculture ........................................... 7 a. Zoning ..................................................................................................................... 8 b. Comprehensive Plans .............................................................................................. 9 c. Conservation Easements/Purchase of Development Rights ................................. 10 d. Land Trusts ........................................................................................................... 11 IV. The Urban Agriculture Climate in Wisconsin ..................................................... 12 a. Municipal Zoning Ordinances .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The New Normal Predicting Climate Impacts and Building Resilient Communities
    The New Normal Predicting climate impacts and building resilient communities join us: Acknowledgements The primary funding for this work was generously provided by the Joyce Foundation. Additional support for Clean Wisconsin’s climate program work is provided by the Garfield Foundation. Lead Author: Katy Walter, Clean Energy Specialist, Clean Wisconsin Several Clean Wisconsin staffers assisted with this report. Special thanks to: Keith Reopelle, Senior Policy Director Amanda Wegner, Creative Director Tyson Cook, Staff Scientist Sam Weis, Communications Director About Clean Wisconsin Clean Wisconsin is an environmental advocacy organization that works to protect Wisconsin’s clean water and air and advocates for clean energy by being an effective voice in the state legislature and by holding elect- ed officials and polluters accountable. Clean Wisconsin was founded in 1970 as Wisconsin’s Environmental Decade and is the state’s largest environmental advocacy organization. page 2 The New Normal Preparing for the New Normal Unprecedented warm spring temperatures interrupt on many facets of life in Wisconsin. Agriculture and Wisconsin’s annual spring maple syrup harvest, leaving outdoor recreation, two prime areas susceptible to a the industry hurting from a 68% decline in production. changing climate, are critical to our way of life and key Cherry farmers from Door County and apple farmers pillars of our economy. Unfortunately, we are already in Bayfield watch helplessly as their fruit trees blos- beginning to see major impacts in these areas. Wiscon- som early, only to be destroyed by frost. In the midst of sin is experiencing the sharpest increase in severe rain1 one of the worst droughts in memory, corn farmers in and is among the states that are warming at the fastest southern Wisconsin hope for rain to save their crops, rate2; Climate Central ranked Wisconsin No.
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Agriculture in Wisconsin: 2012 Status Report
    2012 STATUS REPORT ORGANIC AGRICULTURE IN WISCONSIN: 2012 STATUS REPORT Prepared by the UW-Madison Center for Integrated Agricultural Systems and the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection Authors: Erin Silva, Laura Paine, Matt Barnidge, Cris Carusi and Ruth McNair February, 2012 i ORGANIC AGRICULTURE IN WISCONSIN This report is a joint effort of: The Center for Integrated Agricultural Systems (CIAS) is a research center for sustainable agricul- ture in the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison. CIAS fosters multidisciplinary inquiry and supports a range of research, curriculum and program development projects. It brings together university faculty, farmers, policy makers and others to study relationships between farming practices, farm profitability, the environment and rural vitality. For more informa- tion, visit www.cias.wisc.edu or call 608-262-5200. The Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) works to make Wisconsin a world leader in agriculture, food safety and consumer protection. DATCP is re- sponsible for food safety, animal and plant health, protecting water and soil, and monitoring fair and safe business practices. The DATCP Organic Agriculture Program is housed in the Division of Agri- cultural Development and provides individual technical assistance and education to organic farmers and those wishing to begin farming organically, as well as to businesses processing organic products. For more information, visit datcp.state.wi.us or call 608-224-5120. Media contact: Cris Carusi, CIAS: [email protected] or 608-262-8018 Authors: Erin Silva, Laura Paine, Matt Barnidge, Cris Carusi and Ruth McNair Edited by Cris Carusi and Ruth McNair, CIAS.
    [Show full text]