DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1111.3682V1 [Astro-Ph.EP] 15 Nov 2011 Ant Planets, As Well As Their Dynamical Architecture (I.E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1111.3682V1 [Astro-Ph.EP] 15 Nov 2011 Ant Planets, As Well As Their Dynamical Architecture (I.E Draft version November 17, 2011 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 11/10/09 INSTABILITY-DRIVEN DYNAMICAL EVOLUTION MODEL OF A PRIMORDIALLY 5 PLANET OUTER SOLAR SYSTEM Konstantin Batygin1, Michael E. Brown1 & Hayden Betts2 1Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 and 2Polytechnic School, Pasadena, CA 91106 Draft version November 17, 2011 ABSTRACT Over the last decade, evidence has mounted that the solar system's observed state can be favorably reproduced in the context of an instability-driven dynamical evolution model, such as the \Nice" model. To date, all successful realizations of instability models have concentrated on evolving the four giant planets onto their current orbits from a more compact configuration. Simultaneously, the possibility of forming and ejecting additional planets has been discussed, but never successfully implemented. Here we show that a large array of 5-planet (2 gas giants + 3 ice giants) multi-resonant initial states can lead to an adequate formation of the outer solar system, featuring an ejection of an ice giant during a phase of instability. Particularly, our simulations demonstrate that the eigenmodes which characterize the outer solar system's secular dynamics can be closely matched with a 5-planet model. Furthermore, provided that the ejection timescale of the extra planet is short, orbital excitation of a primordial cold classical Kuiper belt can also be avoided in this scenario. Thus the solar system is one of many possible outcomes of dynamical relaxation and can originate from a wide variety of initial states. This deems the construction of a unique model of solar system's early dynamical evolution impossible. Subject headings: Planets and satellites: dynamical evolution and stability; Kuiper belt: general 1. INTRODUCTION cal population of the Kuiper belt (Batygin et al. 2011). In the last two decades, discoveries of the Kuiper belt Finally, the presence of Jupiter's and Neptune's Trojan (Jewitt & Luu 1993), as well as planets orbiting stars asteroids has been attributed to chaotic capture of plan- other than the Sun (Mayor & Queloz 1995), have sup- etesimals during the instability (Morbidelli et al. 2005; plied the centuries-old quest to understand the formation Nesvorn´yet al. 2007). of the solar system with fresh constraints and insights All successful realizations of the Nice model to date into physical processes at play. Among a multitude of have been comprised exclusively of the four currently newly proposed formation scenarios, the \Nice" model present giant planets. However, there exists no strong (Tsiganis et al. 2005; Gomes et al. 2005; Morbidelli et al. evidence that suggests that additional planets were not 2005) is particularly notable, as it has attained a con- present in the solar system, at the epoch of the dispersion siderable amount of success in reproducing the various of the nebula. In fact, theoretical arguments, presented observed features of the solar system. Within the con- by Goldreich et al. (2004) point to a possibility of ini- text of the scenario envisioned by the Nice model, giant tially forming as many as five ice giants, three of which planets start their post-nebular evolution in a compact, get subsequently removed via ejections (see however Lev- multi-resonant configuration, and following a brief period ison & Morbidelli (2007)). The dynamical sensibility of of dynamical instability, scatter onto their current orbits such a scenario is further strengthened by the fact that a (Morbidelli et al. 2007; Batygin & Brown 2010; Walsh et considerable fraction of standard Nice model simulations al. 2011). result in an ejection of an ice-giant after an encounter The first success of the Nice model lies in its ability with at least one of the gas giants. to quantitatively reproduce the observed orbits of the gi- In this paper, we explore an instability-driven dynam- arXiv:1111.3682v1 [astro-ph.EP] 15 Nov 2011 ant planets, as well as their dynamical architecture (i.e. ical evolution of a 5-planet system (2 gas giants + 3 ice secular eigenmodes of the system) (Tsiganis et al. 2005; giants) with an eye towards identifying a pathway to- Morbidelli et al. 2009). Simultaneously, the brief insta- wards reproduction of solar system-like dynamical archi- bility, inherent to the model, provides a natural trigger tecture. In principle, the realm of possibility available to to the Late Heavy Bombardment (Gomes et al. 2005), as this study is enormous. Consequently, rather than per- well as a transport mechanism for emplacement of dy- forming a comprehensive parameter-search, here we limit namically \hot" Kuiper belt objects (KBOs) from inside ourselves to systems that contain an additional Uranus- of ∼ 35AU (Levison et al. 2008). Meanwhile, it has been like planet, with the aim of presenting a few proof-of- recently demonstrated that survival of a dynamically concept numerical experiments. The plan of the paper is \cold" primordial population between Neptune's current as follows. In section 2, we describe our numerical setup. 3:2 and 2:1 exterior mean-motion resonances (MMRs) is In section 3, we show that in our model, the planetary fully consistent with a Nice model-like evolution of the orbits, their secular eigenmodes, as well as various popu- planets, implying an in-situ formation of the cold classi- lations of the Kuiper belt are approximately reproduced. We conclude and discuss our results in section 4. [email protected] 2 Batygin Brown Betts 40 40 B 3:2 2:1 5:4 5:4 initial condition A 3:2 3:2 2:1 4:3 initial condition 30 30 (AU) (AU) 20 20 a, q, Q q, a, a, q, Q q, a, innermost ice giant ejection innermost ice giant ejection 10 10 0 0 0 1.107 2.107 3.107 4.107 5.107 0 1.107 2.107 3.107 4.107 5.107 t (years) t (years) Fig. 1.| Orbital evolution of planets. Each planet's semi-major axis, as well as perihelion and apohelion distances are shown as functions of time. The actual perihelion and apohelion distances of the planets are also shown for comparison as black error bars. In both cases, the innermost ice-giant ejects during the transient phase of instability, leaving behind 4 planets, whose orbits resemble that of the solar system. See main text for a description of the initial conditions. 2. NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS described above). Each integration was performed using the mercury6 integration software package (Chambers The numerical setup of the simulations performed here 1 was qualitatively similar to those presented by Batygin 1999) and spanned 50Myr . The calculations were per- & Brown (2010) and Batygin et al. (2011). Particularly, formed on Caltech's PANGU super-computer. the five giant planets were initialized in a compact, multi- After their completion, simulations that were deemed resonant initial condition, surrounded by a massive plan- successful were reintegrated with the use of tracer simu- etesimal disk that extended between its immediate sta- lations (see Levison et al. (2008); Batygin et al. (2011)), bility boundary and 30AU. to address the dynamical evolution of a locally formed Two of the three ice-giants were taken to have the same population of KBOs. In particular, each run was sup- mass as Uranus and were initially placed next to Saturn plemented with an additional disk of mass-less particles and as the outermost planet respectively. The middle that resided in the cold classical region of the Kuiper ice-giant was taken to have Neptune's mass. In all sim- belt (i.e. between the final exterior 3:2 and 2:1 MMRs of ulations, Jupiter and Saturn started out in a 3:2 MMR, Neptune). in accord with the results of hydrodynamical simulations 3. RESULTS of convergent migration of the planets in the solar neb- ula (Masset & Snellgrove 2001; Morbidelli & Crida 2007; Out of the 810 integrations that were initially per- Pierens & Nelson 2008). The ice giants were also se- formed, 214 (∼ 25%) cases featured an ejection of a single quentially assembled into first order MMRs by apply- ice-giant, yielding a system composed of 4 planets. Per- ing dissipative forces, designed to mimic the presence of haps unsurprisingly, in most cases the ejected planet is the nebula (Lee & Peale 2002). Following resonant lock- the ice-giant that neighbors Saturn. Of the 750 simu- ing, each assembled multi-resonant initial condition was lations that were performed following the elimination of evolved in isolation for 10Myr, as an immediate test of initial conditions, 33 evolutions resulted in orbits remi- orbital stability. This procedure yielded a total of 81 niscent of the solar system. Specifically, we searched for stable multi-resonant initial conditions. solutions where the Saturn-Jupiter period ratio exceed The search for adequate dynamical evolutions was per- 2, while the final semi-major axes of the ice-giants were formed in two steps. First, we evolved 10 permutations of within 3AU of their observed counterparts. No strong each initial condition, with planetesimal disks composed requirements were placed on the planetary eccentricities of N = 1000 planetesimals. Disk masses were chosen and inclinations. min max It is noteworthy that evolving the giant planets onto so- randomly between Mdisk = 25M⊕ and Mdisk = 100M⊕. The density profiles followed a power-law distribution, lar system-like orbits is insufficient for a simulation to be Σ / rk where the power-law index, k, was chosen ran- deemed successful for indeed, there are additional con- domly between kmin = 1 and kmax = 2. The plan- straints that must be satisfied. The first orbital con- etesimals were initialized on near-circular orbits (e ∼ straint is the reproduction of the secular architecture of sin i ∼ 10−3). To reduce the already substantial com- the system.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Professor Peter Goldreich Member of the Board of Adjudicators Chairman of the Selection Committee for the Prize in Astronomy
    The Shaw Prize The Shaw Prize is an international award to honour individuals who are currently active in their respective fields and who have recently achieved distinguished and significant advances, who have made outstanding contributions in academic and scientific research or applications, or who in other domains have achieved excellence. The award is dedicated to furthering societal progress, enhancing quality of life, and enriching humanity’s spiritual civilization. Preference is to be given to individuals whose significant work was recently achieved and who are currently active in their respective fields. Founder's Biographical Note The Shaw Prize was established under the auspices of Mr Run Run Shaw. Mr Shaw, born in China in 1907, was a native of Ningbo County, Zhejiang Province. He joined his brother’s film company in China in the 1920s. During the 1950s he founded the film company Shaw Brothers (HK) Limited in Hong Kong. He was one of the founding members of Television Broadcasts Limited launched in Hong Kong in 1967. Mr Shaw also founded two charities, The Shaw Foundation Hong Kong and The Sir Run Run Shaw Charitable Trust, both dedicated to the promotion of education, scientific and technological research, medical and welfare services, and culture and the arts. ~ 1 ~ Message from the Chief Executive I warmly congratulate the six Shaw Laureates of 2014. Established in 2002 under the auspices of Mr Run Run Shaw, the Shaw Prize is a highly prestigious recognition of the role that scientists play in shaping the development of a modern world. Since the first award in 2004, 54 leading international scientists have been honoured for their ground-breaking discoveries which have expanded the frontiers of human knowledge and made significant contributions to humankind.
    [Show full text]
  • Order-Of-Magnitude Physics: Understanding the World with Dimensional Analysis, Educated Guesswork, and White Lies Peter Goldreic
    Order-of-Magnitude Physics: Understanding the World with Dimensional Analysis, Educated Guesswork, and White Lies Peter Goldreich, California Institute of Technology Sanjoy Mahajan, University of Cambridge Sterl Phinney, California Institute of Technology Draft of 1 August 1999 c 1999 Send comments to [email protected] ii Contents 1 Wetting Your Feet 1 1.1 Warmup problems 1 1.2 Scaling analyses 13 1.3 What you have learned 21 2 Dimensional Analysis 23 2.1 Newton’s law 23 2.2 Pendula 27 2.3 Drag in fluids 31 2.4 What you have learned 41 3 Materials I 43 3.1 Sizes 43 3.2 Energies 51 3.3 Elastic properties 53 3.4 Application to white dwarfs 58 3.5 What you have learned 62 4 Materials II 63 4.1 Thermal expansion 63 4.2 Phase changes 65 4.3 Specific heat 73 4.4 Thermal diffusivity of liquids and solids 77 4.5 Diffusivity and viscosity of gases 79 4.6 Thermal conductivity 80 4.7 What you have learned 83 5 Waves 85 5.1 Dispersion relations 85 5.2 Deep water 88 5.3 Shallow water 106 5.4 Combining deep- and shallow-water gravity waves 108 5.5 Combining deep- and shallow-water ripples 108 5.6 Combining all the analyses 109 5.7 What we did 109 Bibliography 110 1 1 Wetting Your Feet Most technical education emphasizes exact answers. If you are a physicist, you solve for the energy levels of the hydrogen atom to six decimal places. If you are a chemist, you measure reaction rates and concentrations to two or three decimal places.
    [Show full text]
  • CV Background
    Steven Soter CV 2013 Research Associate, Department of Astrophysics, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024. Visiting Professor, Environmental Studies Program, New York University, 285 Mercer Street, 9th Floor, New York, NY 10003, and Email: <[email protected]>. Tel: 212-769-5230. RECENT ACTIVITIES Research in astronomy and geoarchaeology. Teaching at NYU: courses on Scientific Thinking and Speculation, Geology and Antiquity in the Mediterranean, Life in the Universe, Climate Change, and Energy and Environment. BACKGROUND AND EDUCATION Born in Los Angeles, California, May 1943 BSc in Astronomy/Physics, 1965 University of California at Los Angeles (Advisors: George Abell and Peter Goldreich) PhD in Astronomy, 1971 Cornell University, Ithaca, New York (Advisors: Thomas Gold, Carl Sagan, Joseph Burns) PREVIOUS POSITIONS 1964-66 Research Assistant, Radio Astronomy Project, Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, California 1966-71 Research Assistant, Center for Radiophysics and 1973-79 Space Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. 1971-73 Postdoctoral Fellow, Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science, UC Berkeley 1973-79 Assistant Editor, ICARUS: International Journal of Solar System Studies (Carl Sagan, editor) 1977-80 Co-Writer and Head of Research, COSMOS Television Series, KCET/Los Angeles 1980-87 Senior Research Associate, Center for Radiophyscs and Space Research, Cornell University 1988-97 Special Assistant to the Director, National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 1997-03 Scientist, Hayden Planetarium American Museum of Natural History, New York 2004-13 Research Associate, Department of Astrophysics, American Museum of Natural History, New York 2005-07 Scientist-in-Residence, Center for Ancient Studies, New York University, New York 2008-12 Visiting Professor, Environmental Studies Program, New York University, New York .
    [Show full text]
  • PUZZLES and PROSPECTS in PLANETARY RING DYNAMICS PETER GOLDREICH California Institute of Technology Abstract. I Outline Some Of
    PUZZLES AND PROSPECTS IN PLANETARY RING DYNAMICS PETER GOLDREICH California Institute of Technology Abstract. I outline some of the main processes that shape planetary rings. Then I focus on two outstanding issues, the role of self-gravity in the precession of narrow rings and the dynamics of Neptune's arcs. By airing these well-defined but unsolved problems, I hope to encourage others to join me in the quest for their solutions. 1. Introduction The 15 years just past have witnessed an explosion in our knowledge of planetary rings. Jupiter, Uranus, and Neptune have joined Saturn as members of the family of ringed planets. We have come to appreciate that a few simple physical mechanisms account for the bewildering variety of structures displayed by ring systems. With the completion of the Voyager missions, the level of activity in this field will decline. Major new discoveries probably must await the arrival of the Cassini spacecraft at Saturn a decade hence. Planetary rings were the focus of my research for several years. Although this has not been the case for some time, and may never be again, they still hold my interest. After struggling to understand various issues, I feel well-situated to offer a commentary on unsolved problems. That is my aim here. After a brief review of some of the processes at work in rings, I shall focus attention on two outstanding puzzles. The first involves the precession of narrow rings and, in particular, the role played by the self-gravity of the ring material. The second concerns the mechanisms responsible for the unusual morphology of Neptune's ring arcs.
    [Show full text]
  • The I Nstitute L E T T E R
    THE I NSTITUTE L E T T E R INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY · FALL 2004 ARNOLD LEVINE APPOINTED FACULTY MEMBER IN THE SCHOOL OF NATURAL SCIENCES he Institute for Advanced Study has announced the appointment of Arnold J. Professor in the Life Sciences until 1998. TLevine as professor of molecular biology in the School of Natural Sciences. Profes- He was on the faculty of the Biochemistry sor Levine was formerly a visiting professor in the School of Natural Sciences where he Department at Princeton University from established the Center for Systems Biology (see page 4). “We are delighted to welcome 1968 to 1979, when he became chair and to the Faculty of the Institute a scientist who has made such notable contributions to professor in the Department of Microbi- both basic and applied biological research. Under Professor Levine’s leadership, the ology at the State University of New York Center for Systems Biology will continue working in close collaboration with the Can- at Stony Brook, School of Medicine. cer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Lewis-Sigler Center The recipient of many honors, among for Integrative Genomics at Princeton University, and BioMaPS Institute at Rutgers, his most recent are: the Medal for Out- The State University of New Jersey, as well as such industrial partners as IBM, Siemens standing Contributions to Biomedical Corporate Research, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Merck & Co.,” commented Peter Research from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Goddard, Director of the Institute. Cancer Center (2000); the Keio Medical Arnold J. Levine’s research has centered on the causes of cancer in humans and ani- Science Prize of the Keio University mals.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Peter Goldreich
    PETER GOLDREICH (b. 1939) INTERVIEWED BY SHIRLEY K. COHEN March, April and November 1998 ARCHIVES CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California Preface to the LIGO Series Interviews The interview of Peter Goldreich (1998) was originally done as part of a series of 15 oral histories conducted by the Caltech Archives between 1996 and 2000 on the beginnings of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO). Many of those interviews have already been made available in print form with the designation “The LIGO Interviews: Series I.” A second series of interviews was planned to begin after LIGO became operational (August 2002); however, current plans are to undertake Series II after the observatory’s improved version, known as Advanced LIGO, begins operations, which is expected in 2014. Some of the LIGO Series I interviews (with the “Series I” designation dropped) have now been placed online within Caltech’s digital repository, CODA. All Caltech interviews that cover LIGO, either exclusively or in part, will be indexed and keyworded for LIGO to enable online discovery. The original LIGO partnership was formed between Caltech and MIT. It was from the start the largest and most costly scientific project ever undertaken by Caltech. Today it has expanded into an international endeavor with partners in Europe, Japan, India, and Australia. As of this writing, 760 scientists from 11 countries are participating in the LSC—the LIGO Scientific Collaboration. http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechOH:OH_Goldreich_P Subject area Physics, geology, planetary science, astronomy, astrophysics, LIGO Abstract Interview in five sessions in March, April, and November 1998 with Peter Goldreich, Lee A.
    [Show full text]
  • Iasthe Institute Letter
    G13-16400_IL_FALL2013_Layout 1 12/19/13 10:06 AM Page 1 The Institute Letter InsItitute foAr Advanced SStudy Fall Economics: Science, Craft, or Snake Oil? Ellsworth Kelly’s Dream of Impersonality When economists skip over real-world complications, it’s as if How things that look apparently very simple are in fact much physicists spoke of a world without gravity. more complex than they seem BY DANI RODRIK BY YVE-ALAIN BOIS hen the 2013 Sveriges Riksbank llsworth Kelly is one of the very first WPrize in Economic Sciences in Eartists whose work I liked. Perhaps Memory of Alfred Nobel (colloquially he was second, just after Piet Mondrian. known as the “Economics Nobel”) was One of the things I asked Kelly after we awarded to Eugene Fama and Robert finally met and became friends, close to Shiller, along with Lars Peter Hansen, a quarter of a century ago, was why he N O I many were puzzled by the selection. had not answered a fan letter that I had T C E L L Fama and Shiller are both distinguished written to him in my teens. He remem- O C Y R L E and highly regarded scholars, so it was bered the letter. He had received it at a L K E R K O H Y not their qualifications that raised eye- time when he felt isolated, bypassed by a T R W E O N brows. What seemed odd was that the new generation of artists, and he had W E S L H L T / E R committee had picked them together.
    [Show full text]
  • 1979-1980.Pdf
    1 1980 CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 1201 East California Boulevard a"aUClla. California 91125 795-681 Academic Calendar 4 Directory 6 Board of Truslees 9 Administrative Officers 12 Administrative Committees 13 Faculty Officers and Committees 14 Staff 16 Division of Biology Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering 20 Division of Engineering and Applied Science 25 Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences 34 Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences 37 Division of Physics, Mathematics and Astronomy 40 Sherman Fairchild Distinguished Scholars 47 Athletics and Physical Education 48 Willis H. Booth Computing Center 48 Environmental Quality Laboratory 48 Hale Observatories 49 Health Center 50 Industrial Relations Center 50 Jet Propulsion Laboratory 51 Institute Libraries 52 Musical Activities 52 Officers and Faculty 54 SECTION II GENERAL INFORMATION Introduction 105 Historical Sketch 107 Buildings and Facilities 110 Libraries 114 Industrial Relations Center 115 The Willis H. Booth Computing Center ll5 Postdoctoral Appointments ]]5 Sherman Fairchild Distinguished Scholars Program 116 Study and Research 116 Aeronautics 116 Applied Mathematics 118 Applied Mechanics 118 Applied 119 Astronomy 120 Biology J22 Chemical Engineering 123 Chemistry 124 Civil Engineering 25 Computer Science 126 127 128 129 130 133 135 Materials Science 135 Mathematics Mechanical Engineering 136 Physics 137 Undergraduate Research 139 Student Life 139 Student Health 143 Notices and Agreements 145 SECTION In INFORMATION AND REGULATIONS FOR THE GUIDANCE
    [Show full text]
  • The Shaw Prize Founder's Biographical Note
    The Shaw Prize The Shaw Prize is an international award to honour individuals who are currently active in their respective fields and who have achieved distinguished and significant advances, who have made outstanding contributions in culture and the arts, or who in other domains have achieved excellence. The award is dedicated to furthering societal progress, enhancing quality of life, and enriching humanity's spiritual civilization. Preference will be given to individuals whose significant work was recently achieved. Founder's Biographical Note The Shaw Prize was established under the auspices of Mr. Run Run Shaw. Mr. Shaw, born in China in 1907, is a native of Ningbo County, Zhejiang Province. He joined his brother's film company in China in the 1920s. In the 1950s he founded the film company Shaw Brothers (Hong Kong) Limited in Hong Kong. He has been Executive Chairman of Television Broadcasts Limited in Hong Kong since the 1970s. Mr. Shaw has also founded two charities, The Sir Run Run Shaw Charitable Trust and The Shaw Foundation Hong Kong, both dedicated to the promotion of education, scientific and technological research, medical and welfare services, and culture and the arts. ~ 1 ~ Message from the Chief Executive Message from the Founder This year's Shaw Prize is proof that Education holds the key to the power of science is as strong as progress and has long been ever in the 21st Century. It continues to push back the recognized and revered as the boundaries of science for the good of all mankind. foundation upon which future I am pleased to congratulate the success will be achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • Events in Science, Mathematics, and Technology | Version 3.0
    EVENTS IN SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS, AND TECHNOLOGY | VERSION 3.0 William Nielsen Brandt | [email protected] Classical Mechanics -260 Archimedes mathematically works out the principle of the lever and discovers the principle of buoyancy 60 Hero of Alexandria writes Metrica, Mechanics, and Pneumatics 1490 Leonardo da Vinci describ es capillary action 1581 Galileo Galilei notices the timekeeping prop erty of the p endulum 1589 Galileo Galilei uses balls rolling on inclined planes to show that di erentweights fall with the same acceleration 1638 Galileo Galilei publishes Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences 1658 Christian Huygens exp erimentally discovers that balls placed anywhere inside an inverted cycloid reach the lowest p oint of the cycloid in the same time and thereby exp erimentally shows that the cycloid is the iso chrone 1668 John Wallis suggests the law of conservation of momentum 1687 Isaac Newton publishes his Principia Mathematica 1690 James Bernoulli shows that the cycloid is the solution to the iso chrone problem 1691 Johann Bernoulli shows that a chain freely susp ended from two p oints will form a catenary 1691 James Bernoulli shows that the catenary curve has the lowest center of gravity that anychain hung from two xed p oints can have 1696 Johann Bernoulli shows that the cycloid is the solution to the brachisto chrone problem 1714 Bro ok Taylor derives the fundamental frequency of a stretched vibrating string in terms of its tension and mass p er unit length by solving an ordinary di erential equation 1733 Daniel Bernoulli
    [Show full text]
  • The I Nstitute L E T T E R
    THE I NSTITUTE L E T T E R INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY · FALL 2006 THE SIMONS CENTER FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY: FINDING SIGNALS IN THE NOISE iscoveries in biology historically have been the province of experimentalists. But lution, migration, and the probabilities of the dis- Dadvances during the past decade in sequencing human and other genomes have tribution of genes in populations. “We can trace brought forth a vast amount of data that has led to the nascent but burgeoning field back through time the evolution of humans into called systems biology in which theoretical approaches to biology play a vital role. “Biol- different races, into different groups,” said Levine. ogy has been predominantly an experimental science,” said Arnold J. Levine, Professor Current research involves using such data to in the School of Natural Sciences and head of The Simons Center for Systems Biology look at systems at the molecular, cellular, and organ- at the Institute for Advanced Study. “That is especially true of twentieth-century biolo- ismic levels, to understand how they develop and gy, which really did not have a strong theoretical component, but instead, was based on interact and to discern what goes wrong in certain observations.” disease states, as well as to address important prob- Systems biology is a rapidly growing and increasingly important field. Under Profes- lems in biology that concern genetics and genomics, sor Levine, The Simons Center is focused on research at the interface of molecular biol- polymorphisms and aspects of evolution, signal ogy and the physical sciences. To move forward the frontiers of understanding of funda- transduction pathways and networks, stress respons- mental biological problems, Members and Visitors explore and mine large data sets of es, and pharmacogenomics in cancer biology.
    [Show full text]
  • Trustees, Administration, Faculty (PDF)
    Section Six Trustees, Administration, Faculty 540 Trustees, Administration, Faculty OFFICERS Robert B. Chess (2006) Chairman Nektar Therapeutics Kent Kresa, Chairman Lounette M. Dyer (1998) David L. Lee, Vice Chairman Gilad I. Elbaz (2008) Founder Jean-Lou Chameau, President Factual Inc. Edward M. Stolper, Provost William T. Gross (1994) Chairman and Founder Dean W. Currie Idealab Vice President for Business and Frederick J. Hameetman (2006) Finance Chairman Charles Elachi Cal American Vice President and Director, Jet Robert T. Jenkins (2005) Propulsion Laboratory Peter D. Kaufman (2008) Sandra Ell Chairman and CEO Chief Investment Officer Glenair, Inc. Peter D. Hero Jon Faiz Kayyem (2006) Vice President for Managing Partner Development and Alumni Efficacy Capital Ltd. Relations Louise Kirkbride (1995) Sharon E. Patterson Board Member Associate Vice President for State of California Contractors Finance and Treasurer State License Board Anneila I. Sargent Kent Kresa (1994) Vice President for Student Chairman Emeritus Affairs Northrop Grumman Corporation Mary L. Webster Jon B. Kutler (2005) Secretary Chairman and CEO Harry M. Yohalem Admiralty Partners, Inc. General Counsel Louis J. Lavigne Jr. (2009) Management Consultant Lavigne Group David Li Lee (2000) BOARD OF TRUSTEES Managing General Partner Clarity Partners, L.P. York Liao (1997) Trustees Managing Director (with date of first election) Winbridge Company Ltd. Alexander Lidow (1998) Robert C. Bonner (2008) CEO Senior Partner EPC Corporation Sentinel HS Group, L.L.C. Ronald K. Linde (1989) Brigitte M. Bren (2009) Independent Investor John E. Bryson (2005) Chair, The Ronald and Maxine Chairman and CEO (Retired) Linde Foundation Edison International Founder/Former CEO Jean-Lou Chameau (2006) Envirodyne Industries, Inc.
    [Show full text]