242 1 Journal of P A Jazwiec and Nutritional impacts on 242:1 T51–T68 Endocrinology D M Sloboda offspring reproduction THEMATIC REVIEW Nutritional adversity, sex and reproduction: 30 years of DOHaD and what have we learned? Patrycja A Jazwiec1,2 and Deborah M Sloboda1,2,3 1Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada 2The Farncombe Family Digestive Diseases Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada 3Department of Pediatrics and Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada Correspondence should be addressed to D M Sloboda:
[email protected] This paper is part of a thematic section on 30 Years of the Developmental Endocrinology of Health and Disease. The guest editors for this section were Sean Limesand, Kent Thornburg and Jane Harding Abstract It is well established that early life environmental signals, including nutrition, set the Key Words stage for long-term health and disease risk – effects that span multiple generations. This f maternal nutrition relationship begins early, in the periconceptional period and extends into embryonic, f developmental fetal and early infant phases of life. Now known as the Developmental Origins of programming Health and Disease (DOHaD), this concept describes the adaptations that a developing f undernutrition organism makes in response to early life cues, resulting in adjustments in homeostatic f obesity systems that may prove maladaptive in postnatal life, leading to an increased risk of f reproduction chronic disease and/or the inheritance of risk factors across generations. Reproductive maturation and function is similarly influenced by early life events. This should not be surprising, since primordial germ cells are established early in life and thus vulnerable to early life adversity.