IMPRISONMENT: Prisons, and Their Administration, It Is a Stat

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

IMPRISONMENT: Prisons, and Their Administration, It Is a Stat DR.SANGEETA MEHTA VISITING FACULTY- DEPARTMENT OF LAW UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI. STUDY MATERIAL FOR LL.M GROUP- V -MODULE IV SEM-IV TOPIC : IMPRISONMENT: Prisons, and their administration, It is a state subject covered by item 4 under the State List in the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India. The management and administration of prisons falls exclusively in the domain of the State governments, and is governed by the Prisons Act, 1894 and the Prison manuals of the respective state governments. Thus, the states have the primary role, responsibility and authority to change the current prison laws, rules and regulations.[1] The Central Government provides assistance to the states to improve security in prisons, for the repair and renovation of old prisons, medical facilities, development of borstal schools, facilities to women offenders, vocational training, modernization of prison industries, training to prison personnel, and for the creation of high security enclosures. The Supreme Court of India, in its judgements on various aspects of prison administration, has laid down 3 broad principles regarding imprisonment and custody. First, a person in prison does not become a non-person. Second, a person in prison is entitled to all human rights within the limitations of imprisonment. Third, there is no justification for aggravating the suffering already inherent in the process of incarceration. A section of the Madras Central Prison before demolition in 2009. Prison establishments in India comprise 8 categories of jails. The most common and standard jail institutions are Central Jails, District Jails and Sub Jails. The other types of jail establishments are Women Jails, Borstal Schools, Open Jails and Special Jails. Central jail The criteria for a jail to be categorised as a Central Jail varies from state to state. However, the common feature observed throughout India is that prisoners sentenced to imprisonment for a long period (more than 2 years) are confined in the Central Jails, which have larger capacity in comparison to other jails. These jails also have rehabilitation facilities. Madhya Pradesh has the highest number of 11 Central Jails followed by Maharashtra, Punjab, Rajasthan and Tamil Naduwith 9 each. Karnataka and Delhi each have 8 Central Jails. Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu & Lakshadweep do not have any Central Jails. District jail District jails serve as the main prisons in States/UTs where there are no Central Jails. States which have considerable number of District Jails are Uttar Pradesh(57), Madhya Pradesh(39), Bihar(31), Maharashtra(28), Rajasthan(24), Assam (22), Karnataka (19), Jharkhand (17)and Haryana (16), Kerala (11), WestBengal(12), Chhattisgarh (11), Jam mu & Kashmir and Nagaland (10 each). Sub jail Sub jails are smaller institutions situated at a sub-divisional level in the States. 9 states have reported comparatively higher number of sub-jails revealing a well-organized prison set-up even at lower formation. These states are Maharashtra (100), Andhra Pradesh (99), Tamil Nadu (96), Madhya Pradesh (72), Karnataka (70), Odisha (73), Rajasthan (60), Telangana and West Bengal (33 each). Odisha had the highest capacity of inmates in various Sub-Jails. 7 States/UTs have no sub-jails namely Arunachal Pradesh, Haryana, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim, Chandigarh and Delhi. Women's Jail Jails built to exclusively house women prisoners. Most of the staff in such jails are usually women. Maharashtra has 5 women jails. Kerala and Tamil Nadu each have 3 women jails. Borstal School Borstal Schools are a type of youth detention centre and are used exclusively for the imprisonment of minors or juveniles. The primary objective of Borstal Schools is to ensure care, welfare and rehabilitation of young offenders in an environment suitable for children and keep them away from contaminating atmosphere of the prison. The juveniles in conflict with law detained in Borstal Schools are provided various vocational training and education with the help of trained teachers. The emphasis is given on the education, training and moral influence conducive for their reformation and prevention of crime. Nine States namely, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Kerala, Maharashtra, Punjab, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu and Telangana have borstal schools in their respective jurisdictions. Tamil Nadu had the highest capacity for keeping 678 inmates. Himachal Pradesh and Kerala are the only states that have the capacity to lodge female inmates in 2 of their Borstal Schools. There are no borstal schools in any of the UTs at the end of 2015. Open jail Open jails are minimum security prisons. Prisoners with good behaviour satisfying certain norms prescribed in the prison rules are admitted in open prisons. Prisoners, here, are engaged in agricultural activities. P. T. Chacko Home minister of Kerla Introduced First Open Jail In India Nettukaltheri Near Neyyar Trivandrum on 28 August 1962. Seventeen states have functioning Open Jails in their jurisdiction. Rajasthan reported the highest number of 29 open jails. There are no Open Jails in any of the UTs at the end of 2015.[4] Special jail Special jails are high security facilities that have specialized arrangements for keeping offenders and prisoners who are convicted of terrorism, insurgency and violent crimes. Special jail means any prison provided for the confinement of a particular class or particular classes of prisoners which are broadly as follows: • Prisoners who have committed serious violations of prison discipline. • Prisoners showing tendencies towards violence and aggression. • Difficult discipline cases of habitual offenders. • Difficult discipline cases from a group of professional/organised criminals. Kerala has the highest number of special jails - 16. Provision for keeping female prisoners in these special jails is available in Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, Gujarat, Kerala, Assam, Karnataka and Maharashtra.[4] Other jails Jails that do not fall into the categories discussed above, fall under the category of Other Jails. Three states - Karnataka, Kerala & Maharashtra - have 1 other jail each in their jurisdiction. No other state/UT has an other jail at the end of 2015. The capacity of inmates (male & female) reported by these three States in such jails was highest in Karnataka (250) followed by Kerala (142), Goa (45) and Maharashtra (28).[ Expenditure All states and UTs in India had a combined sanctioned budget of ₹42,788.12 million (US$600 million) in 2014-15 for prison related expenditure.[7] Prison expenditure is broadly categorised as Plan Expenditure and Non-Plan Expenditure. Expenditure on specific planned activities under the Five Year Plan is termed as Plan Expenditure. Expenditure made for meeting day-to-day expenses and running establishments like payment of salaries, wages, rent, etc. come under the Non-Plan Expenditure. Non-Plan Expenditure may also include activities for development of existing infrastructure and bringing about improvements in the prisons. Expenditure on prison inmates is categorised as Food, Clothing, Medical, Vocational/Educational facilities, Welfare and Other expenses. Food expenses account for more than half the total expenditure on prison inmates. Prison population statistics As of 31 December 2014, there are 1387 functioning jails in India having a total capacity to house 356,561 prisoners. As of the same date, there were 418,536 inmates in jails across in India. Males at 400,855 make up 95.8% of prisoners while females at 17,681 represent 4.2%. As of 31 December 2015, there are 1401 functioning establishments/institutions in India housing a total of 419,623 inmates, which includes pre-trial detainees and remand prisoners. The remand prisoners and pre-trial detainees account for 67.2% of the prison population in India. The official capacity of the prison system is 366,781 therefore, the occupancy level is at 114.4%. Of these prisoners, 4.3% are female prisoners and 1.5% are foreign prisoners. One of the primary reasons for the overcrowding of prisons is the pendency of court cases. As on March 31, 2016, more than 3 crore cases are pending in various courts, and two of every three prison inmates in the country are under trials. The 4,19,623 prisoners of 2015, for example, included 2,82,076 under trials, or 67%, according to NCRB data.[9] Some other causes for big pre-trial population are corruption, role of police, prosecutors, and judiciary. Indian police system is heavily understaffed and underpaid. It contributes to high detainees population since there are less officials for accused prisoners to accompany them to court. So, their date for hearing keeps getting pushed back. Prosecutors in India are also substantially burdened. There are many vacant assistant posts, but no incentive has been made to fill those posts to fast track the process. Judiciary department also contributes to such extensiveness of pre-trial detainees. There is a back log of 30 million cases in India. With so many cases to handle, shockingly the number of judges in India is comparatively very low. There are only 10.5 judges on average per every million people. Many of the pre- trial detainees are poor and underprivileged. Even though for some of them bail is approved, they still cannot get out because they do not have the money or resources to payout the bail. Many of detainees are also uneducated and completely unaware of their rights. About 71% of pre-trial detainees are illiterate and do not even have a high school diploma.[o, they are ignorant of many amendments that have been passed, which they can seek to go free Types of prison inmates Prison inmates lodged in Indian jails are categorised as Convicts, Under-trials and Detenues. A convict is "a person found guilty of a crime and sentenced by a court" or "a person serving a sentence in prison" An under-trial is a person who is currently on trial in a court of law.
Recommended publications
  • Prison Statistics India–2019 Executive Summary
    Prison Statistics India–2019 Executive Summary Prisons – Types & Occupancy No. of Actual Capacity No. of Prisoners at Occupancy Rate at Year Prisons of Prisons the end of the year the end of the year 2017 1,361 3,91,574 4,50,696 115.1% 2018# 1,339 3,96,223 4,66,084 117.6% 2019# 1,350 4,03,739 4,78,600 118.5% As per data provided by States/UTs. # Due to non-receipt of data from West Bengal for the year 2018 & 2019, data furnished for 2017 has been used. Note: Figures as on 31st December of the respective year 1. The total number of prisons at national level has increased from 1,339 in 2018 to 1,350 in 2019, having increased by 0.82%. 2. The 1,350 prisons in the country consist of 617 Sub Jails, 410 District Jails, 144 Central Jails, 86 Open Jails, 41 Special Jails, 31 Women Jails, 19 Borstal School and 2 Other than the above Jails. 3. The highest number of jails was reported in Rajasthan (144) followed by Tamil Nadu (141), Madhya Pradesh (131), Andhra Pradesh (106), Karnataka (104) and Odisha (91). These Six (6) States together cover 53.11 % of total jails in the country as on 31st December, 2019. 4. Delhi has reported the highest number of Central jails (14) in the country. States/UTs like Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, A & N Island, D & N Haveli, Daman & Diu and Lakshadweep have no central Jail as on 31st December, 2019. 5. Uttar Pradesh has reported the highest number of District jails (62).
    [Show full text]
  • Don't Always Take It on Face Value That We Are the Enemy
    “I am clear that Can prisoners be the vital work sent books or not? We have the definitive of prison reform answer will continue Mailbag // page 5 at pace” When Hilary Met Sally What happened when a the National Newspaper for Prisoners & Detainees Who is new Justice former prisoner met his old Secretary Elizabeth Truss? headteacher in prison? a voice for prisoners since 1990 Comment // page 20 Jailbreak // page 46 August 2016 / Issue No. 206 / www.insidetime.org / A ‘not for profit’ publication / ISSN 1743-7342 Time to Talk 2016 National Prison Radio survey inside An average of 60,000 copies distributed monthly Independently verified by the Audit Bureau of Circulations Don’t always take it on face value that we are the enemy Paul Sullivan him to being a prison officer being a prison officer.” something back. I think now National chairman in the first place. Was it some- your average prison officer is Meeting the national chair- thing he considered when he He’s now been a prison officer extremely overworked, ex- man of the Prison Officers’ left school? “No”, he says, “I for thirteen years and I won- tremely stressed, doesn’t feel Mike Rolfe gives dered how much he thought Association was a little daunt- started off wanting to be a me- in control, doesn’t have the the job had changed in that ing, especially as it was the chanic; I was quite good at relationship with prisoners first time such a senior POA Maths so I ended up becoming time? “For me, personally, Inside Time first ever they used to have, and that official had agreed to speak to an accountant, before trying quite a bit.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifteen Suggested Legal Reforms for Maharashtra
    Briefing Book for 2021 Fifteen Suggested Legal Reforms for Maharashtra Fifteen Suggested Legal Reforms for Maharashtra Briefing Book for 2021 Vidhi Maharashtra Published in 2021 by Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy A-232, Defence Colony New Delhi 110024 Designed by Naxcent. Set in GT Super Text by Grilli Type and Lato by tyPoland Printed by Brand Profit Print & Pack Unit No. 3, Gami Industrial Park Navi Mumbai 400705 [email protected] © Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy 2021 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means; electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission of the publisher. The Briefing Book is a list of recommended reforms for the State of Maharashtra. In 2021, we focus on the core areas that were affected by the onset of COVID-19. The pandemic has taught us the importance of our community and systems and how they might be enhanced to deal with similar situations in the future. The suggested reforms thus focus on how we as a community can learn from the pandemic and strengthen systems for the citizens of Maharashtra. Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy is an independent think-tank doing legal research to make better laws and improve governance for the public good. Contributors Alok Prasanna Ameen Jauhar Arghya Sengupta Chitrakshi Jain Debadityo Sinha Debanshu Mukherjee Dhvani Mehta Kim D’Souza Neha Singhal Nisha Vernekar Pooja Pandey Rahela Khorakiwala Sakshi Pawar Shehnaz Ahmed Sumeysh Srivastava Vistasp Irani Yogini Oke Acknowledgments We would like to sincerely thank Ajay Kranthi, Akshiti Vats, Nimrat Kaur, Nohid Nooreyezdan, Prerna Sengupta and Utkarsh Tripathi for their valuable research inputs.
    [Show full text]
  • FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Advancement of Social
    Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative 55A, Third Floor, Siddhartha Chambers – I Kalu Sarai, New Delhi – 110016 Website: www.humanrightsinitiative.org Tel: 91-11-43180219 Fax: 91-11-2686 4688 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Advancement of Social Responsibility within Rajasthan Prisons: Interactions among Civil Society Organisations and Corporates 17th February 2015, Jaipur The Prison Reforms Programme of Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI) jointly with Rajasthan State Human Rights Commission (RSHRC) organised a one day roundtable on ‘Civil Society and Corporate Participation in Prisons’ today. The panel of speakers consisted of Dr. M.K. Devarajan, Member of the RSHRC, Ms. Maja Daruwala, Director of CHRI, Mr. R.K. Saxena, Retd. IG Prison, Rajasthan and Mr. Nigel Akkara, Entrepreneur, Kolkata Facilities Management. This was held over the issues regarding prison reforms in Rajasthan, where CHRI has been working for the last 4 years. Over thirty civil societies groups and six corporates, from the districts of Jaipur, Ajmer and Jodhpur from Rajasthan and from Delhi, took part during the interactive sessions to discuss civil and corporate interventions in prisons. Dr. Devarajan shared the manifold impacts of collaborations by the Tamil Nadu Prisons with NGOs and corporates on cultivating skills. This sparked responses from the participants on problems regarding strictly defined CSR mandates that make it difficult for corporates to invest in the vocational training and skill development of prisoners. The Hon. Secretary General of the Rajasthan Chamber of Commerce, Mr. K.L. Jain said that the list of areas where CSR investment may be done does not yet have prisoners’ livelihoods as a priority area and that he would take up this issue with the corporates in his organisation so that this may be rectified.
    [Show full text]
  • India's Constitution of 1949 with Amendments Through 2015
    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:33 constituteproject.org India's Constitution of 1949 with Amendments through 2015 This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:33 Table of contents Preamble . 21 PART I: THE UNION AND ITS TERRITORY . 21 1. Name and territory of the Union . 21 2. Admission or establishment of new States . 21 2A. Sikkim to be associated with the Union . 21 3. Formation of new States and alteration of areas, boundaries or names of existing States . 21 4. Laws made under articles 2 and 3 to provide for the amendment of the First and the Fourth Schedules and supplemental, incidental and consequential matters . 22 PART II: CITIZENSHIP . 22 5. Citizenship at the commencement of the Constitution . 22 6. Rights of citizenship of certain persons who have migrated to India from Pakistan . 23 7. Rights of citizenship of certain migrants to Pakistan . 23 8. Rights of citizenship of certain persons of Indian origin residing outside India . 24 9. Persons voluntarily acquiring citizenship of a foreign State not to be citizens . 24 10. Continuance of the rights of citizenship . 24 11. Parliament to regulate the right of citizenship by law . 24 PART III: FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS . 24 12. Definition . 24 13. Laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights . 24 14. Equality before law . 25 15. Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth . 25 16. Equality of opportunity in matters of public employment .
    [Show full text]
  • Tatistical Anal'ysis
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. .. " AND ;TATISTICAL ANAL'YSIS CENTRAL BUREAU OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES Dt.'p..1.rt me 11 t of Soci;:d \"Ielfar'\'; , , Government of\1 ndb t '" ,. i " 1.! , ~. i I i l; " I,. PART I PROBATION SERVICES 1964 to 1968 CENTRAL BUREAU OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE GOVERNMENT OF fNOIA RAMAK1HSHNAPURAM New .Dclhl-22. PROBATION SERVrCES IN INDIA A Fh'e- Year Statistical Study (1964-1968) PREFACE The Central Bureau of Correctional Services has been collecting statistics on various Social Defence Services from all over the country. Eadier a Five-year Statistical Analysis on Prisons has been published in May, 1971. What appears in the following pages is a comparative study on Probation Services in India for a five-year period, 1964 to 1968, based on statistics received from 11 States and 2 Union Territories. It is for the first time that such a comparative State-wisl! data on Probation Services i~ available in a publication as a part of observance of Probation year-1971. Being the first compilation of its type, it may have various limitations. All the States and Union Terri­ tories do nol furnish such data in time. Though a standard proforma is issued annually by the Bureau, if the primary data is not comprehensive. the compilation becomes difficult at the State level and all the more difficult at the national level. Several States are handicapped as they do not have a statistical and research cell at the district or state headquarters.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter-1 Prisons
    Chapter – 1 Prisons – Types and Occupancy Introduction year 2018 is the twenty fourth in the series. Prison administration is an Prisons exist at three levels such important component of criminal justice as Taluk level, District level and system. Prison institutions are known by Zonal/Range level and Jails at these different names in different countries like levels are called as Sub Jail, District ‘Correctional Facilities’, ‘Detention Jail and Central Jail respectively. Centre’, ‘Jails’, ‘Remand Centre’ etc. Generally, capacity in terms of There is a paradigm shift in social view infrastructure, available prison staffs & point towards prisoners in last century. powers vested in them, security, facilities Earlier system of prison with punitive to prisoners such as medical, educational attitude where in inmates were forcibly and rehabilitation etc. are progressively confined and deprived a variety of better from Sub jail to Central Jail. freedom as a form of punishment has changed with a change in social State/UT wise Number of prisons, perception towards prison and prisoners. Capacity and Inmate Occupancy in the It is now treated as correction or Country as on 31st December, 2018 improvement facility which itself indicates that there is more emphasis on I. State/UT wise Number of reformation of prisoners than to punish Prisons: them. As on 31st December, 2018 there In last few decades, prison were 1,339 Jails in the country. State of population has increased tremendously Tamil Nadu has the highest number (138 which creates number of challenges out of 1,339) of jails among the States/UTs before prison administration like security followed by Rajasthan (130), Madhya & safety in prison, hygiene issues, Pradesh (130), Andhra Pradesh (105) overcrowding, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Encountering the Origin and Development of Criminal Behaviour of a Young Offender
    © 2019 JETIR June 2019, Volume 6, Issue 6 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) Encountering the Origin and Development of Criminal Behaviour of a Young Offender V.Arockiam * & Dr.R.Mani ** Research Scholar * and Professor ** Centre for Gandhian Studies,The Gandhigram Rural Institute - Deemed to be University- Dindigul- Tamilnadu –India. Abstract This paper is particularly concerned with discovering the causes for young people within the context of becoming possible offenders. It is a great concern of everyone and particularly of prison social worker, who can play a major role in the life of a young offender. There are several factors which cause young people to become offenders around the globe. There is a considerable debate about how the young as creative, vibrant, realistic, and potential they are, become offenders due to diverted behavior. However there is some uncertainty about the accurate cause for their offending behavior. It is highly important to note that cause of an offence by young offender differs from individual to individual. One becomes an offender due to certain factor and the same factor does not affect another individual to become an offender. There is a great disagreement amongst researchers that offensive behavior raises with age, it is more common after puberty and increases over the course of adolescence. It is rather difficult to know how often young people involve in an offending act. There is also a widely accepted hypothesis that young people who commit an offence rarely have certain reason but act as friendship sake. According to the National Crime Record Bureau (NCRB) crime by young women has remained stable while crime by young men has rapidly doubled in the past few years.
    [Show full text]
  • India's Constitution of 1949 with Amendments Through 2012
    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:33 constituteproject.org India's Constitution of 1949 with Amendments through 2012 This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:33 Table of contents Preamble . 21 PART I: THE UNION AND ITS TERRITORY . 21 1. Name and territory of the Union . 21 2. Admission or establishment of new States . 21 2A. Sikkim to be associated with the Union . 21 3. Formation of new States and alteration of areas, boundaries or names of existing States . 21 4. Laws made under articles 2 and 3 to provide for the amendment of the First and the Fourth Schedules and supplemental, incidental and consequential matters . 22 PART II: CITIZENSHIP . 22 5. Citizenship at the commencement of the Constitution . 22 6. Rights of citizenship of certain persons who have migrated to India from Pakistan . 23 7. Rights of citizenship of certain migrants to Pakistan . 23 8. Rights of citizenship of certain persons of Indian origin residing outside India . 24 9. Persons voluntarily acquiring citizenship of a foreign State not to be citizens . 24 10. Continuance of the rights of citizenship . 24 11. Parliament to regulate the right of citizenship by law . 24 PART III: FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS . 24 12. Definition . 24 13. Laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights . 24 14. Equality before law . 25 15. Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth . 25 16. Equality of opportunity in matters of public employment .
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking the Hegemony of the Prison an Analysis of The
    BREAKING THE HEGEMONY OF THE PRISON AN ANALYSIS OF THE EMERGENCE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE DETENTION CENTRE SYSTEM by Jacqueline A. Dunn Ph.D. Thesis Centre for Criminological and Socio-Legal Studies, Faculty of Law The University of Sheffield 1985 Acknowledgments and grateful thanks go to : - the friends and colleagues too numerous to name, who have provided spiritual and intellectual support throughout the period in which this thesis was written; but particularly to Tony Bottoms, Tony Richardson, Barbara Holland, Jennie King, Duncan Kitchen and Mike Smith for their belief in both the writer and the research act; also to Vera Marsh who not only typed it with such impressive speed and accuracy, but also provided constant support and encouragement. SUMMARY: BREAKING THE HEGEMONY OF THE PRISON : AN ANALYSIS OF THE EMERGENCE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE DETENTION CENTRE SYSTEM Ph.D. Thesis: Jacqueline Dunn Faculty of Law The alversity of Sheffield SUMMARY The purpose of this study is to develop a theoretically viable and empirically detailed analysis of the emergence of the Detention Centre in the young offender sector of the English penal system. In doing so, it is intended to eradicate the hiatus created by either an absence of research, or by research which has been unable or unconcerned for epistemological reasons to address the Detention Centre's problematic emergence in English penal history - both in Its 'pre-legislative' stage, and in its period of development ,from a minority to a majority form of disposal, and through to its threatened demise in the mid-1970's. The central methodological concern of this study is to situate the analysis within the parameters of what has been termed the breaking of the hegemony of the prison for young offenders, and informed by a contingent and complementary analysis of the history of socio-political, economic and cultural developments throughout the period, from the late nineteenth century to the mid-1970's.
    [Show full text]
  • World Factbook of Criminal Justice Systems
    WORLD FACTBOOK OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEMS INDIA R.K. Raghavan Indian Police Service This country report is one of many prepared for the World Factbook of Criminal Justice Systems under Bureau of Justice Statistics grant No. 90-BJ-CX-0002 to the State University of New York at Albany. The project director was Graeme R. Newman, but responsibility for the accuracy of the information contained in each report is that of the individual author. The contents of these reports do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Bureau of Justice Statistics or the U. S. Department of Justice. GENERAL OVERVIEW i. Political system. India attained independence from the British Crown on August 15, 1947, and became a sovereign democratic republic on January 26, 1950. The Constitution of India provides for a quasi-federal system of government. The President acts as Head of State. A Council of Ministers, headed by the Prime Minister, aid and advise the President. The Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha, the lower house of Parliament. The country is divided into 25 States, each headed by a Governor appointed by the Union Government. A Council of Ministers headed by the Chief Minister aids and advises him or her and is collectively responsible to the State Legislative Assembly. (Article 372 of the Constitution of India protects all the law in force before the commencement of the Constitution until altered, repealed, or amended by the competent Legislature or authority. It is under this provision that the common law of the land has survived.
    [Show full text]
  • Dialogues in Criminal Justice and Rehabilitation
    & Rehabilit al ati g on e -L In o i it c ia o t S i v Dialogues in Criminal Justice f e O s i n m C u r J o S and Rehabilitation F NGONGO FORUMFORUM Year - December 2018 For private circulation No. 9 Special Issue - Civil Society Interventions in Prisons Dialogues in Criminal Justice Editorial and Rehabilitation Social work intervention in prisons in India began with A newsletter of NGO Forum of organisations the work of Prayas, around 3 decades ago. Ever since, working in the Criminal Justice System (CJS), to this sector has been gradually growing and expanding. initiate discussion among the government The number of NGOs working in the field has authorities, civil society organisations and other increased with a few state government departments stake holders in the CJS, with special reference to the legal rights and the rehabilitation of citizens also expressing the need for appointment of social affected by crime or commericial sexual workers in the criminal justice system. Dialogues has exploitation. been trying to highlight some of the issues faced by prison populations and the work being done by civil NGO Forum Members society organisations in this regard. 1. Disha, Amravati The scope of the civil society intervention has 2. Sahaara Charitable Trust, Mumbai expanded in the field from to include persons being 3. Sahayog Trust, Pune processed at police stations, courts, prisons, juvenile 4. Sudisha, Solapur homes, aftercare institutions, etc. There are a few 5. Sudhar, Bhopal NGOs focusing on the situation of under trial prisoners with the objective of legal aid, family support and 6.
    [Show full text]