DOCSLIB.ORG

California Historic Route 66 Corridor Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
California Historic Route 66 Corridor Management Plan California Historic Route 66 CMP: Needles to Barstow Page 9 2. Planning Context Historic Route 66 through the Mojave Desert travels through a mosaic of publicly and privately owned landscapes. This chapter documents land ownership, agency responsibility for land use and resource management, and ongoing plans and programs relevant to the development and implementation of the Corridor Management Plan (CMP). This chapter also documents efforts made as part of the planning process to reach out to various stakeholders—both within and outside the corridor—with an interest in its preservation and enhancement as an historic travel route managed for heritage tourism. RELATED PROGRAMS, PLANS AND STUDIES Throughout the corridor there are related and ongoing planning, development and management efforts that need to be coordinated with the CMP. Route 66 is in the County of San Bernardino maintained road system (CMRS), except for the portions that travel through the City of Needles, the City of Barstow, and that follow segments of U.S. Route 95 and Interstate 40. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is responsible for more than 58.6 percent of the lands that can be seen from the route. The Department of Defense (DoD) operates two military bases that overlap with the corridor. The National Park Service (NPS) manages the Mojave National Preserve lands visible from portions of the route. Tribal lands are visible from the route near Needles. Use of private lands in the corridor is governed by San Bernardino County, the City of Needles or the City of Barstow. INTERAGENCY AND NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT EFFORTS There are many related interagency planning and management efforts that could influence the future of the route. These include • Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP) • Mojave Trails National Monument (proposed by Senator Feinstein) • Route 66 Corridor Preservation Program, NPS • World Monument Fund (WMF)– The Road Ahead • Old Spanish National Historic Trail, managed by NPS • Castellus Acquisition Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan According to its web page “the purpose of the DRECP is to conserve and manage plant and wildlife communities in the desert regions of California while facilitating the timely permitting of compatible renewable energy projects.” The DRECP is a collaborative effort being developed under the California Natural Community Conservation Planning Act (NCCPA), the Federal Endangered Species May 2015 Chapter 2: Planning Context Page 10 California Historic Route 66 CMP: Needles to Barstow Route 66 Economic Impact Act (FESA), and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act Study (FLPMA)1. A public draft of the proposed DRECP was released in September 2014. The proposed DRECP and its effect on the context Rutgers, the State of Historic Route 66 is discussed further in Chapter 4, Stewardship. University of New Jersey, was commissioned by the World Monuments Fund Mojave Trails National Monument (Proposed) to assess the potential A draft proposal has been developed and has been widely circulated economic impact of Historic by Senator Dianne Feinstein’s office for the establishment of the Route 66 from Chicago to Mojave Trails National Monument. A map of the proposed boundaries Santa Monica, California. can be found at: http://www.energy.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/ files/serve?File_id=b60bcf4e-f659-a3fe-640a-6cdea1e4429b A survey of travelers found that Route 66 attracted The boundary of the proposed monument includes much of the visitors • to authentic places and Historic Route 66 corridor west of Needles and east of Ludlow, local businesses northward to the Mojave Preserve and southward to 29 Palms Marine • that are mostly middle Corp Base and BLM Wilderness Area boundaries of Old Woman age and middle/upper Mountains, Stepladder Mountains and Chemehuevi. The proposed income monument boundary is also referenced in the proposed DRECP. • that spend $1,500- 2,000 per travel party National Park Service Corridor Preservation Program 40-60 percent of which is NEW spending in In 1999, Congress passed Public Law 106-45, to preserve the cultural communities resources of the Route 66 corridor and to authorize the Secretary The study also found that: of the Interior to provide guidelines and a program of technical • 85 percent of travelers assistance and grants that will set priorities for the preservation of visit historic places and the Route 66 corridor. museums • $38 Million a year is The resulting Route 66 Corridor Preservation Program, administered spent in communities by NPS: • $94 million in annual “collaborates with private property owners; non-profit investments are organizations; and local, state, federal, and tribal governments made in Main Street to identify, prioritize, and address Route 66 preservation Revitalization and museums needs. It provides cost-share grants to successful applicants for The study found the the preservation and restoration of the most significant and following economic gains representative properties dating from the route’s period of • 2,400 jobs outstanding historical significance, 1926 through 1970.” • $90 million in income The program is scheduled to legislatively terminate at the end of • $262 million in overall fiscal year 2019, at which time NPS will appoint a non-federal entity output (or entities) to continue the program’s purpose. • $127 million in GDP • $37 million in tax revenues World Monument Fund – The Road Ahead • Tourism contributes The mission of WMF, an independent organization dedicated to significantly to local, saving the world’s most treasured places, is to preserve important county, state and architectural and cultural heritage sites around the globe. Route 66 national economies was listed on the 2008 World Monuments Watch “to draw attention to the complex challenges of preserving not only an iconic cultural Study available at www. landscape, but a historic American experience.”2 The WMF, in cr.nps.gov/rt66 and http:// wmf.org 1 http://www.drecp.org/whatisdrecp/ accessed March 08, 2014 2 http://www.wmf.org/project/historic-route-66 accessed March 08, 2014 Chapter 2: Planning Context May 2015 California Historic Route 66 CMP: Needles to Barstow Page 11 addition to calling attention to the preservation challenge sponsored an economic impact study by Rutgers University that documented the benefits of preservation and heritage-based tourism along the route and sponsored workshops with key stakeholders along the route to help call attention to the economic opportunities. ROUTE Old Spanish National Historic Trail World Monuments Fund Since 1965, World Monuments Fund has worked to preserve important architectural and cultural heritage sites around the globe, with projects in more The Old Spanish National Historic Trail wasthan designated ninety countries. Through partnerships by with localCongress communities, funders, and governments, WMF inspires an enduring commitment to stewardship for future generations. Headquartered in New York, WMF has offices and affiliates worldwide. in 2002. The trail runs through New Mexico,wmf.org, Colorado, twitter.com/worldmonuments, Arizona,and facebook.com/worldmonuments. A Synthesis of Findings of the Route 66 Economic Impact Study, along with a Utah, Nevada and California. The BLM andtwo-volume NPS Technical administer Report, are available at: http://www.wmf.org/dig-deeper/ the trail THE ROAD AHEAD publication/route-66-economic-impact-study-synthesis-findings. together to encourage preservation and public use. These two A strategic roundtable to leverage new opportunities and innovative partnerships in heritage tourism and historic preservation along the Mother Road. federal agencies work in close partnership with the Old Spanish Trail November 20–21, 2013 Association; American Indian tribes; state, county, and municipal Anaheim, California The event will be hosted at Disney’s Cars Land, which is helping to tell the story of Route 66 to a new generation. governmental agencies; private landowners; nonprofit groups; and many others. Organized by World Monuments Fund with generous support from American Express Charleston Cruise Tourism Conference Of particular importance to the CMP is that portion of the Old Planning Meeting April 30, 2012 Spanish Trail where all three routes come together with Historic Figure 11 The World MonumentWorld Monuments Fund, New York Route 66 at Fork of Roads, east of present-day Barstow in the Mojave Fund hosted a strategicATTENDEE roundtable CONTACTS Ackerman, Lisa Hildreth, John Sanchis, Frank of RouteExecutive 66 Vice partners President and Chief to discussDirector, Southern Regional Office Program Director, United States desert. The Desert Discovery Center and the Mojave River Valley Operating Officer National Trust for Historic Preservation World Monuments Fund World Monuments Fund [email protected] 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2412 new opportunities350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2412 and innovative New York, NY 10118 Museum, both in Barstow, provide interpretation related to historic New York, NY 10118 Honey, Martha [email protected] (646) 424-9594 Director [email protected] in heritage tourismCenter for Sustainable and Travel Thompson, Evan 1333 H Street, NW Executive Director travel routes, providing an important context for Historic Route 66. Avrami, Erica Suite 300, East Tower Preservation Society of Charleston Research and Education Director Washington, DC 20005 147 King Street historicWorld preservation Monuments Fund along(202) Route 347-9203 66 . Post Office
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Grand Canyon of the Mojave.” It Was Originally Called Cave Canyon, but Acquire the Current Name After the Railroad Stop of Afton Was Created at the West End
    Afton Canyon: Afton Canyon is often called “the Grand Canyon of the Mojave.” It was originally called Cave Canyon, but acquire the current name after the railroad stop of Afton was created at the west end. It’s one of the few places where the Mojave River flows above ground in places all year round. Vehicle access is permitted through most of the canyon, however no vehicles are allowed in the western end, where the “horseshoe” is and where the caves are located. This closed area is bypassed by taking the access road along the railroad tracks and driving through the Mojave River wash under the railroad tressel. At one time there was a train stop at Afton and a station. Afton Cemetery is located south of where the station once sat. There are five stone-covered mounds and wooden crosses. One of the burials has been identified as that of Jose Flores, born about 1882, died May 29, 1906. Flores was one of three men who arrived at Afton Station on an early-morning train hoping to be hired on. They were intoxicated and after attacking Section Foreman Robert Y. Williams, who was severely injured in the brawl, Flores was killed. The other two were wounded, one fatally. [John V. Richardson, Jr., San Bernardino County Museum Association Quarterly, Vol. 55, Number 4, 2010]. MojaveRd1West Pages 5, 6. GPS: 35.030936,-116.366846 Arbuckle Mine: A magnesite (magnesium) mine high up on the side of a cliff on the south side of Afton Canyon. A large piece of timber at the mine has "Arbuckle Mine 1894" carved into it.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions
    United States Department of Agriculture Wilderness Visitors and Forest Service Recreation Impacts: Baseline Rocky Mountain Research Station Data Available for Twentieth General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-117 Century Conditions September 2003 David N. Cole Vita Wright Abstract __________________________________________ Cole, David N.; Wright, Vita. 2003. Wilderness visitors and recreation impacts: baseline data available for twentieth century conditions. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-117. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 52 p. This report provides an assessment and compilation of recreation-related monitoring data sources across the National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS). Telephone interviews with managers of all units of the NWPS and a literature search were conducted to locate studies that provide campsite impact data, trail impact data, and information about visitor characteristics. Of the 628 wildernesses that comprised the NWPS in January 2000, 51 percent had baseline campsite data, 9 percent had trail condition data and 24 percent had data on visitor characteristics. Wildernesses managed by the Forest Service and National Park Service were much more likely to have data than wildernesses managed by the Bureau of Land Management and Fish and Wildlife Service. Both unpublished data collected by the management agencies and data published in reports are included. Extensive appendices provide detailed information about available data for every study that we located. These have been organized by wilderness so that it is easy to locate all the information available for each wilderness in the NWPS. Keywords: campsite condition, monitoring, National Wilderness Preservation System, trail condition, visitor characteristics The Authors _______________________________________ David N.
    [Show full text]
  • The Desert Serrano of the Mojave River
    The Desert Serrano of the Mojave River Mark Q. Sutton and David D. Earle Abstract century, although he noted the possible survival of The Desert Serrano of the Mojave River, little documented by “perhaps a few individuals merged among other twentieth century ethnographers, are investigated here to help un- groups” (Kroeber 1925:614). In fact, while occupation derstand their relationship with the larger and better known Moun- tain Serrano sociopolitical entity and to illuminate their unique of the Mojave River region by territorially based clan adaptation to the Mojave River and surrounding areas. In this effort communities of the Desert Serrano had ceased before new interpretations of recent and older data sets are employed. 1850, there were survivors of this group who had Kroeber proposed linguistic and cultural relationships between the been born in the desert still living at the close of the inhabitants of the Mojave River, whom he called the Vanyumé, and the Mountain Serrano living along the southern edge of the Mojave nineteenth century, as was later reported by Kroeber Desert, but the nature of those relationships was unclear. New (1959:299; also see Earle 2005:24–26). evidence on the political geography and social organization of this riverine group clarifies that they and the Mountain Serrano belonged to the same ethnic group, although the adaptation of the Desert For these reasons we attempt an “ethnography” of the Serrano was focused on riverine and desert resources. Unlike the Desert Serrano living along the Mojave River so that Mountain Serrano, the Desert Serrano participated in the exchange their place in the cultural milieu of southern Califor- system between California and the Southwest that passed through the territory of the Mojave on the Colorado River and cooperated nia can be better understood and appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • VOL. 1889 Twentieth Annual Reunion of the Association of the Graduates of the United States Military Academy, at West Point
    TWENTIETH ANNUAL REUNION OF THE ASSOCIATION I GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY, AT WEST POINT, NEW YORK, _YUNE i21/t, 1889. EAST SAGINAW, MICH. EVENING NEWS PRINTING AND BINDING HOUSE. 1889. Annual Reunion, June 2th, 1889. MINUTES OF THE BUSINESS MEETING. WEST POINT, N. Y., JUNE 12th, 1889. The Association met in the Chapel of the United States Mili- tary Academy, at 2.30 o'clock P. M., and was called to order by General George W. Cullum, of the Executive Committee. The Chaplain of the Military Academy offered the customary prayer. The roll was then called by the Secretary. ROLL OF MEMBERS. Those present are indicated by a *, and those deceased in italic. 1808. 1820. Sylvanus Thayer. Edward G. W. Butler. Rawlins Lowndes. 1814. John M. Tufts. Charles S. Merchant. 1821. 1815. ~181~~5~.~Seth M. Capron. Simon Willard. 1822.1822. James Monroe. WILLIAM C. YOUNG. Thomas J. Leslie. David H. Vinton. Charles Davies. Isaac R. Trimble. Benjamin H. Wright. 1818. 1823. Horace Webster. Alfred Mordeca. Harvey Brown. GEORGE S. GREENE. Hartman Bache. HANNIBAL DAY. George H. Crosman. 1819. Edmund B. Alexander. Edward D. Mansfield. 1824. Henry Brewerton. Henry A. Thompson. Dennis H. Mahan. Joshua Baker. Robert P. Parrott, Daniel Tyler. John King Findlay. William H. Swift. John M. Fessenden. 4 ANNUAL REUNION, JUNE 12Tli, 1889. 1825. Ward B. Burnett. James H. Simpson. Washington Seawell. Alfred Brush. N. Sayre Harris. Rlo2Randolph B. Marcy. 1826. ALBERT G. EDWARDS. WILLIAM H. C. BARTLETT. 1833. Samuel P. Heintzelman. John G. Barnard. AUGUSTUS J. PLEASANTON. *GEORGE W. CULLUM. Edwin B. Babbitt.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Regular Army
    Brzadi-r . visit. information war* ud «Imm ¦tatementa taoant Colonel Hannibal Dajr, of tfcsSWMd fcifantry, la larmarter («wil. General Montgomery 0 ruarra to whom he to about P»T.« They allowed fcim taining geod OUR ARMY. Co!«nel.Ril'vard K. 3. < THu to ride away unmolested. Taking a leisurely pace to were worthy of belief. REGULAR mw colonel «r the dixth. Meigs, thrve assistant quftrtrrniMtern guueral, fV»«n«N anby (BrIgad.er banker into the of them since the middle of been leer*). avoid suspicion, the patsed tlmbcr.aud One Dux, November, I HOMOTIOXS FROM TBS BAKU. Charles Thomas, Daniel P. Tomnfc.n* nnrl Thtmvt Swords, I ifutrakD! A. aa soon &a he hmiself out of tu hia in Jackson Colonel.KOward King thought sight, put spurs Knoxvilie, t.'halianooga, Murlntwboro, Mobile, will four taartermastera Lieutenant ¦ U. Samuet K Dewee* horse, shaping hia course toward the rive-. He arrived at and Grenada, and furnisher ub with the following iui®r- Below be found a complete hat or tk officers of our depoty pwnl, Colon- Majors.Stephen carpenter, in a *hort tuuo. the derived trom obaervatioa and The who bar* been front lb« ran Crosman, Tibion. Hibiey and Babbit twelve Geo gv I.. Willard. the boat Leaving horse to lnation, partly jieraonal Special Army Register regular unj promoted Ira. nuarter- rtie only cipuiai of infantry heldmg generate' «.»> "rnn to grasa. Mix went directly to the captain of the other sources:. Wa It for the of m in a mora uutm, with the rank of major, and forty thrco <u4igi M';D Too foroe in Mid.le Tennessee Is prist purpose placing record, raiaatuua in the vnlun'eer toree are Alexander Me Mill Boy and (old him of his adventure.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Spanish National Historic Trail Final Comprehensive Administrative Strategy
    Old Spanish National Historic Trail Final Comprehensive Administrative Strategy Chama Crossing at Red Rock, New Mexico U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service - National Trails Intermountain Region Bureau of Land Management - Utah This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents Old Spanish National Historic Trail - Final Comprehensive Administrative Stratagy Table of Contents i Table of Contents v Executive Summary 1 Chapter 1 - Introduction 3 The National Trails System 4 Old Spanish National Historic Trail Feasibility Study 4 Legislative History of the Old Spanish National Historic Trail 5 Nature and Purpose of the Old Spanish National Historic Trail 5 Trail Period of Significance 5 Trail Significance Statement 7 Brief Description of the Trail Routes 9 Goal of the Comprehensive Administrative Strategy 10 Next Steps and Strategy Implementation 11 Chapter 2 - Approaches to Administration 13 Introduction 14 Administration and Management 17 Partners and Trail Resource Stewards 17 Resource Identification, Protection, and Monitoring 19 National Historic Trail Rights-of-Way 44 Mapping and Resource Inventory 44 Partnership Certification Program 45 Trail Use Experience 47 Interpretation/Education 47 Primary Interpretive Themes 48 Secondary Interpretive Themes 48 Recreational Opportunities 49 Local Tour Routes 49 Health and Safety 49 User Capacity 50 Costs 50 Operations i Table of Contents Old Spanish National Historic Trail - Final Comprehensive Administrative Stratagy Table of Contents 51 Funding 51 Gaps in Information and
    [Show full text]
  • Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan Proposed Land
    DRECP Proposed LUPA and Final EIS CHAPTER III.8. CULTURAL RESOURCES III.8 CULTURAL RESOURCES This chapter presents the Affected Environment for the Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA) Decision Area and the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP) area for cultural resources. These areas overlap, and in the following programmatic discussion are referred to broadly as the “California Desert Region.” More than 32,000 cultural resources are known in the DRECP area in every existing environmental context ⎼ from mountain crests to dry lake beds ⎼ and include both surface and subsurface deposits. Cultural resources are categorized as buildings, sites, structures, objects, and districts (including cultural landscapes and Traditional Cultural Properties) under the federal National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). Historic properties are cultural resources included in, or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), maintained by the Secretary of the Interior (36 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 60.4). See Section III.8.1.1 for more information on federal regulations and historic properties. This chapter discusses three types of cultural resources classified by their origins: prehistoric, ethnographic, and historic. Prehistoric cultural resources are associated with the human occupation of California prior to prolonged European contact. These resources may include sites and deposits, structures, artifacts, rock art, trails, and other traces of Native American human behavior. In California, the prehistoric period began over 12,000 years ago and extended through the eighteenth century until 1769, when the first Europeans settled in California. Ethnographic resources represent the heritage of a particular ethnic or cultural group, such as Native Americans or African, European, Latino, or Asian immigrants.
    [Show full text]
  • Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan Proposed Land Use Plan Amendment & Final Environmental Impact Statement (DRECP PLUPA/FEIS)
    Director’s Protest Resolution Report Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan Proposed Land Use Plan Amendment & Final Environmental Impact Statement (DRECP PLUPA/FEIS) September 14, 2016 1 Contents Reader’s Guide................................................................................................................................ 3 List of Commonly Used Acronyms ................................................................................................ 4 Protesting Party Index ..................................................................................................................... 5 Issue Topics and Responses ............................................................................................................ 8 NEPA – Range of Alternatives ................................................................................................... 8 NEPA – Best Available Information ......................................................................................... 18 NEPA – Purpose and Need ....................................................................................................... 22 NEPA – Impacts Analysis - General ......................................................................................... 28 NEPA – Impacts Analysis - Air ................................................................................................ 42 NEPA – Impacts Analysis - Soil ............................................................................................... 48 NEPA – Impacts Analysis – Prime
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L
    Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 10, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) Sec. 1132. Extent of System. § 1110. Liability 1133. Use of wilderness areas. 1134. State and private lands within wilderness (a) United States areas. The United States Government shall not be 1135. Gifts, bequests, and contributions. liable for any act or omission of the Commission 1136. Annual reports to Congress. or of any person employed by, or assigned or de- § 1131. National Wilderness Preservation System tailed to, the Commission. (a) Establishment; Congressional declaration of (b) Payment; exemption of property from attach- policy; wilderness areas; administration for ment, execution, etc. public use and enjoyment, protection, preser- Any liability of the Commission shall be met vation, and gathering and dissemination of from funds of the Commission to the extent that information; provisions for designation as it is not covered by insurance, or otherwise. wilderness areas Property belonging to the Commission shall be In order to assure that an increasing popu- exempt from attachment, execution, or other lation, accompanied by expanding settlement process for satisfaction of claims, debts, or judg- and growing mechanization, does not occupy ments. and modify all areas within the United States (c) Individual members of Commission and its possessions, leaving no lands designated No liability of the Commission shall be im- for preservation and protection in their natural puted to any member of the Commission solely condition, it is hereby declared to be the policy on the basis that he occupies the position of of the Congress to secure for the American peo- member of the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • VOL. 1879 Tenth Annual Reunion of the Association of the Graduates of the United States Military Academy, at West Point, New
    TENTH ANNUAL REUNION OF THE SSOCIATION OF THE 5PADUATT OF THIlE Unit(d Sti ls M] tiraAdoilel, AT WESTr OIvT, JV WT YORIlK. JUNE 12, 1879. tesw ^,S5ork: D. VAN NOSTRAND, PUBLISHER, 23 MURRAY AND 27 WARREN ST. 1879. ANNUAL REUNION JUNE 12, 1879. MINUTES OF THE BUSINESS MEETING. WEST POINT, N. Y., June 12, 1879. The Association met in the Chapel of the United States Military Academy, and was called to order by General George W. Cullum, Chairman of the Executive Committee. Prayer was offered by the Rev. Dr. John Forsyth, Chaplain of the Military Academy. The roll was then called by the Secretary. ROLL OF MEMBERS. Those present are indicated by a ", and those deceased in italics. CLASS. CLASS. i808 Sylvanus Thayer. HANNIBAL DAY. MC T 823 GEORGE H. CROSMAN. 1814 CHARLESI84S S. S. MERCHANT. EDMUND B.B.ALEXANDER. ALEXANDER. r Simon Willard. ennis an. I815 Thoames J. ese. I824 Robert P. Parrott. r J\vies'. \ -*JOHN M. FESSENDEN. lCharles Davies. Horaebste. 18 WASHINGTON SEAWELL. (Horace Webster. T825 N. SAYRE HARRIS. 8 i8 H8arvey Brown. Hartman Bache. f WM. H. C. BARTLETT. EWRD. MANSFILD SAM'L P. HEINTZELMAN. EDWARD D. MANSFIELD. r enry Bewerton. I826 AUG'ST'SA J.J PLEASONTON.,PL ONON. ienry BrerEDWIN B. BABBITT. HENRY A. THOMPSON.atanie C. Macrae. I9 *JOSHUA BAKER. aS C. Macrae. I *DANIEL TYLER. L SILAS CASEY. William H. Swift. ( EBENEZER S. SIBLEY. 820 Rawsowndes. 87 ALEXANDER J. CENTER. 1820, RasLoes. R2n NATHANIEL J. EATON. I821 Set/h M. Capron. LAbraham Van Buren. WILLIAM C. YOUNG. ( Albert E. Church. 1822 David H.
    [Show full text]
  • West Mojave Route Management Plan, Historic Properties Treatment Plan, Attachment 5: Historic Trails Context Study FINAL VERSION May 2019
    West Mojave Route Management Plan, Historic Properties Treatment Plan, Attachment 5: Historic Trails Context Study FINAL VERSION May 2019 Prepared for: United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management California Desert District Office 22835 Calle San Juan de Los Lagos Moreno Valley, California 92553 Prepared by: Diane L. Winslow, M.A., RPA, Shannon Davis, M.A., RPH, Sherri Andrews, M.A., RPA, Marilyn Novell, M.S., and Lindsey E. Daub, M.A., RPA 2480 N. Decatur Blvd., Suite 125 Las Vegas, NV 89108 (702) 534-0375 ASM Project Number 29070 West Mojave Route Management Plan, Historic Properties Treatment Plan, Attachment 5: Historic Trails Context Study Prepared for: United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management California Desert District Office 22835 Calle San Juan de Los Lagos Moreno Valley, California 92553 Prepared by: Diane L. Winslow, M.A., RPA, Shannon Davis, M.A., RPH, Sherri Andrews, M.A., RPA, Marilyn Novell, M.S., and Lindsey E. Daub, M.A., RPA ASM Affiliates, Inc. 2480 North Decatur Boulevard, Suite 125 Las Vegas, Nevada 89108 May 2019 PN 29070 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page MANAGEMENT SUMMARY ................................................................................. v 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1 2. LITERATURE REGARDING TRAILS, ROADS, AND HIGHWAYS ............... 7 3. DEFINING TRAILS, ROADS, AND HIGHWAYS ........................................... 9 4. PREHISTORIC, PROTO-HISTORIC, AND
    [Show full text]
  • Special Use Provisions in Wilderness Legislation
    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Books, Reports, and Studies Resources, Energy, and the Environment 2004 Special Use Provisions in Wilderness Legislation University of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/books_reports_studies Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, and the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons Citation Information Special Use Provisions in Wilderness Legislation (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2004). SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS IN WILDERNESS LEGISLATION (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2004). Reproduced with permission of the Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment (formerly the Natural Resources Law Center) at the University of Colorado Law School. SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS IN WILDERNESS LEGISLATION Natural Resources Law Center University of Colorado School of Law 401 UCB Boulder, Colorado 80309-0401 2004 Table of Contents SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS IN WILDERNESS LEGISLATION ........................................................... 1 I. Overview ................................................................................................................................. 1 II. Specific Special Use Provisions............................................................................................. 1 A. Water Rights ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]