DOCSLIB.ORG

Preserving Ukraine's Independence, Resisting Russian Aggression

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Preserving Ukraine's Independence, Resisting Russian Aggression Preserving Ukraine’s Independence, Resisting Russian Aggression: What the United States and NATO Must Do Ivo Daalder, Michele Flournoy, John Herbst, Jan Lodal, Steven Pifer, James Stavridis, Strobe Talbott and Charles Wald © 2015 The Atlantic Council of the United States. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the Atlantic Council, except in the case of brief quotations in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. Please direct inquiries to: Atlantic Council 1030 15th Street, NW, 12th Floor Washington, DC 20005 ISBN: 978-1-61977-471-1 Publication design: Krystal Ferguson; Cover photo credit: Reuters/David Mdzinarishvili This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The authors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council, the Brookings Institution, and the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, and their funders do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s conclusions. February 2015 PREFACE This report is the result of collaboration among the Donbas provinces of Donetsk and Luhansk. scholars and former practitioners from the A stronger Ukrainian military, with enhanced Atlantic Council, the Brookings Institution, the defensive capabilities, will increase the pros- Center for a New American Security, and the pects for negotiation of a peaceful settlement. Chicago Council on Global Affairs. It is informed When combined with continued robust Western by and reflects mid-January discussions with economic sanctions, significant military assis- senior NATO and U.S. officials in Brussels and tance to bolster Ukraine’s defensive capabilities senior Ukrainian civilian and military officials in will make clear that the West will not accept Kyiv and at the Ukrainian “anti-terror operation” the use of force to change borders in Europe. headquarters in Kramatorsk. President Putin may hope to achieve glory through restoring, through intimidation and The report outlines the background to the force, Russian dominion over its neighbors. But crisis over Ukraine, describes why the United a peaceful world requires opposing this through States and NATO need to engage more actively decisive action. and urgently, summarizes what the authors heard in discussions at NATO and in Ukraine, We fully endorse the analysis and recommen- and offers specific recommendations for steps dations contained in the report and urge the that Washington and NATO should take to Obama Administration and NATO governments, strengthen Ukraine’s defenses and thereby with support from the U.S. Congress and Allied enhance its ability to deter further Russian parliaments, to move rapidly to implement the aggression. recommendations. Such action would contribute to helping Ukraine restore control over its border and territory in Ivo Daalder, President, the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, and former U.S. Permanent Representative to NATO Michele Flournoy, Chair, Center for a New American Security, and former Under Secretary of Defense John Herbst, Director, Dinu Patriciu Eurasia Center, the Atlantic Council, and former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Jan Lodal, Distinguished Fellow and former President, the Atlantic Council, and former Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense Steven Pifer, Senior Fellow, the Brookings Institution, and former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine James Stavridis, Member of the Board, the Atlantic Council, Dean, Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University, and former Supreme Allied Commander Europe Strobe Talbott, President, the Brookings Institution, and former Deputy Secretary of State Charles Wald, Member of the Board, the Atlantic Council, and former Deputy Commander, U.S. European Command TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Background: A Putin-Manufactured Conflict ................................................................................................................ 2 The Case for Increased U.S. Military Assistance Now ............................................................................................... 2 Providing Military Support to Deter Further Aggression ......................................................................................... 3 Recommendations for Specific Military Assistance ................................................................................................... 4 Supporting Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Appendix 1: September 5 Minsk Ceasefire Protocol ................................................................................................... 7 Appendix 2: Russian/Separatist Military Advantages ............................................................................................... 8 Appendix 3: Key Elements of the Ukraine Freedom Support Act of 2014 ........................................................ 9 Appendix 4: Discussions in Brussels, January 12, 2015 ........................................................................................... 10 Appendix 5: Discussions in Ukraine, January 13-16, 2015 .........................................................................................11 Preserving Ukraine’s Independence, Resisting Russian Aggression: What the United States and NATO Must Do EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We face a critical juncture in Ukraine. There is no real possible in 2015, followed by additional tranches of $1 billion in FY 2016 and FY 2017. mid-January,ceasefire; indeed, with thereRussian/separatist was a significant forces increase launching in Additional non-lethal assistance should include: counter- attacksfighting on along the theDonetsk line of airport contact and in easternother areas. Ukraine Instead in battery radars, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), of a political settlement, Moscow currently seeks to electronic counter-measures for use against opposing UAVs, secure communications capabilities, armored to pressure and destabilize the Ukrainian government. Humvees and medical support equipment. Russianscreate a frozen continue conflict to be in present eastern in Ukraine the Donetsk as a meansand Lethal defensive military assistance should include light Luhansk oblasts in substantial numbers and have anti-armor missiles, given the large numbers of armored vehicles that the Russians have deployed in Donetsk and could be preparation for another major Russian/ Luhansk and the abysmal condition of the Ukrainian separatistintroduced offensive. significant amounts of heavy weapons. This military’s light anti-armor weapons. Russian success would fatally undermine Ukraine’s Other NATO members should provide military assistance stability and embolden the Kremlin to further challenge as well. Of particular use to the Ukrainian military would the security order in Europe. It might tempt President be equipment and weapons from NATO members who Putin to use his doctrine of protecting ethnic Russians operate former Soviet equipment compatible with the and Russian speakers in seeking territorial changes arms currently in the Ukrainian inventory. elsewhere in the neighborhood, including in the Baltic States, provoking a direct challenge to NATO. Assisting Ukraine to deter attack and defend itself Maintaining Western sanctions are critical but not is not inconsistent with the search for a peaceful, political solution—it is essential to achieving it. Only if deterrence in Ukraine by raising the risks and costs to the Kremlin knows that the risks and costs of further Russiaby themselves of any renewed sufficient. major The offensive.West needs to bolster political solution. Russia’s actions in and against Ukraine That requires providing direct military assistance—in posemilitary the actiongravest are threat high towill European it seek to security find an inacceptable more far larger amounts than provided to date and including than 30 years. The West has the capacity to stop Russia. lethal defensive arms—so that Ukraine is better able The question is whether it has the will. to defend itself. The U.S. government should provide Ukraine $1 billion in military assistance as soon as ATLANTIC COUNCIL 1 Preserving Ukraine’s Independence, Resisting Russian Aggression: What the United States and NATO Must Do economy—particularly as oil prices have dropped Background: substantially, sharply reducing export earnings. But A Putin-Manufactured Conflict they have not yet achieved their principal political goal: effecting a change in Russian policy toward Ukrainian President Yanukovych’s November 2013 Ukraine. Western leaders have stated that sanctions will decision, apparently under great pressure from Putin, remain in place until the Kremlin’s policy changes in a not to sign an association agreement with the European Union triggered massive demonstrations and an intense political crisis within Ukraine. The Ukrainian significantAlthough there way. have been numerous diplomatic February 2014, when Yanukovych abandoned his little real progress has
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Euromaidan Newsletter # 74 CIVIC SECTOR OF
    CIVIC SECTOR OF EUROMAIDAN GRASSROOTS MOVEMENT 2015 EuroMaidan Newsletter # 74 Fighting heats up in eastern Ukraine May 4 – a Europe whole, free, and at peace” Joe Biden. At least two more Ukrainian soldiers have been killed http://goo.gl/B78Vps and scores wounded following increased shelling by Russian-backed militant groups in eastern Ukraine. Despite a sizeable $17.5 billion (€15.9 billion) IMF April The fighting was heaviest around Donetsk and loan to Ukraine in March, there is a disconcerting 8 Mariupol in southeastern Ukraine. (Video) sense that Western leaders are losing interest in the 2 http://goo.gl/4giorl . country. Not surprisingly, no new aid packages for 4 Ukraine were announced at recent IMF and World 7 The United States is changing how it talks about the # Bank meetings. Meanwhile, President Obama still conflict in eastern Ukraine to reflect the depth of refuses to provide military assistance to help Ukraine Russian involvement. The Associated Press reported defend itself against further Russian aggression. on April 30 that U.S. officials stated, based on http://goo.gl/ntrKT8 intelligence from the region, that Russia has significantly deepened its command and control of John Herbst Speech at JCE Conference: It’s Not separatist forces in recent months. Since then, the Russia Against the West, It’s Reaction Against the United States has quietly introduced a new term: Future. http://goo.gl/1QUxDm "combined Russian-separatist forces." http://goo.gl/snbTfm Battle-experienced “Pravyi Sector” fighters will enhance the Ukrainian Army, states SBU Head NEWSLETTER “Russia today is occupying Ukrainian land, sending Valentyn Nalyvaichenko, on his return from the anti- Russian troops, Russian-hired thugs and mercenaries, terrorist operation zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Euromaidan Newsletter No. 51
    CIVIC SECTOR OF EUROMAIDAN GRASSROOTS MOVEMENT 2014 EuroMaidan Newsletter # 51 Kyiv commemorates the year since start of Euromaidan protests New Ukraine coalition seeks EU integration, sets NATO as a priority Holodomor Memorial Day, the Security Service of Ukraine November November A year ago one of the most unprecedented revolutions in (SBU) and Liberation Movement Research Centre released Ukraine’s history began. Here is how it unfolded via the most documents about Ukrainian protests during those years (Ukr, 24 important videos of the revolution. http://goo.gl/yCDQh0 photos) http://www.cdvr.org.ua/node/2731 ; Electronic - One in five Ukrainians took part in EuroMaidan. Archive (Ukr) http://avr.org.ua/ 18 http://goo.gl/OLBGN6 The SBU presented a book about the 1932-1933genocide of . The killing of more than 100 Ukrainians by the ousted Ukrainians. http://goo.gl/hPIOa5 51 president remains unpunished a year later, enraging those # Dancing with Stalin. The Holodomor genocide famine in who took part in the Revolution of Dignity, which started on Ukraine. http://goo.gl/WJ8NgG Nov. 21, 2013 when the government backed out of preparations for signing a major treaty with the European About the Holodomor. http://goo.gl/j9tmX6 Union. http://goo.gl/vPAU5h Today, on Holodomor Memorial Day, we commemorate "The Heavenly Hundred through their deaths prevented the those who died of starvation during the great famine of 1932- death of many other people. And Ukraine took a step forward. 1933. This post describes the treacherous path to the Thanks to such acts society consolidates and a nation recognition of this grave crime and concludes that Ukraine emerges.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Hybrid Warfare
    Research Paper Research Division – NATO Defense College, Rome – No. 105 – November 2014 Russia’s Hybrid Warfare Waging War below the Radar of Traditional Collective Defence by H. Reisinger and A. Golts1 “You can’t modernize a large country with a small war” Karl Schlögel The Research Division (RD) of the NATO De- fense College provides NATO’s senior leaders with “Ukraine is not even a state!” Putin reportedly advised former US President sound and timely analyses and recommendations on current issues of particular concern for the Al- George W. Bush during the 2008 NATO Summit in Bucharest. In 2014 this liance. Papers produced by the Research Division perception became reality. Russian behaviour during the current Ukraine convey NATO’s positions to the wider audience of the international strategic community and con- crisis was based on the traditional Russian idea of a “sphere of influence” and tribute to strengthening the Transatlantic Link. a special responsibility or, stated more bluntly, the “right to interfere” with The RD’s civil and military researchers come from countries in its “near abroad”. This perspective is also implied by the equally a variety of disciplines and interests covering a 2 broad spectrum of security-related issues. They misleading term “post-Soviet space.” The successor states of the Soviet conduct research on topics which are of interest to Union are sovereign countries that have developed differently and therefore the political and military decision-making bodies of the Alliance and its member states. no longer have much in common. Some of them are members of the European Union and NATO, while others are desperately trying to achieve The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the this goal.
    [Show full text]
  • Procedures for Reverencing the Tabernacle and the Altar Before, During and After Mass
    Procedures for Reverencing the Tabernacle and the Altar Before, During and After Mass Key Terms: Eucharist: The true presence of Christ in the form of his Body and Blood. During Mass, bread and wine are consecrated to become the Body and Blood of Christ. Whatever remains there are of the Body of Christ may be reserved and kept. Tabernacle: The box-like container in which the Eucharistic Bread may be reserved. Sacristy: The room in the church where the priest and other ministers prepare themselves for worship. Altar: The table upon which the bread and wine are blessed and made holy to become the Eucharist. Sanctuary: Often referred to as the Altar area, the Sanctuary is the proper name of the area which includes the Altar, the Ambo (from where the Scriptures are read and the homily may be given), and the Presider’s Chair. Nave: The area of the church where the majority of worshippers are located. This is where the Pews are. Genuflection: The act of bending one knee to the ground whilst making the sign of the Cross. Soon (maybe even next weekend – August 25-26) , the tabernacle will be re-located to behind the altar. How should I respond to the presence of the reserved Eucharist when it will now be permanently kept in the church sanctuary? Whenever you are in the church, you are in a holy place, walking upon holy ground. Everyone ought to be respectful of Holy Rosary Church as a house of worship and prayer. Respect those who are in silent prayer.
    [Show full text]
  • Sanctuary: a Modern Legal Anachronism Dr
    SANCTUARY: A MODERN LEGAL ANACHRONISM DR. MICHAEL J. DAVIDSON* The crowd saw him slide down the façade like a raindrop on a windowpane, run over to the executioner’s assistants with the swiftness of a cat, fell them both with his enormous fists, take the gypsy girl in one arm as easily as a child picking up a doll and rush into the church, holding her above his head and shouting in a formidable voice, “Sanctuary!”1 I. INTRODUCTION The ancient tradition of sanctuary is rooted in the power of a religious authority to grant protection, within an inviolable religious structure or area, to persons who fear for their life, limb, or liberty.2 Television has Copyright © 2014, Michael J. Davidson. * S.J.D. (Government Procurement Law), George Washington University School of Law, 2007; L.L.M. (Government Procurement Law), George Washington University School of Law, 1998; L.L.M. (Military Law), The Judge Advocate General’s School, 1994; J.D., College of William & Mary, 1988; B.S., U.S. Military Academy, 1982. The author is a retired Army judge advocate and is currently a federal attorney. He is the author of two books and over forty law review and legal practitioner articles. Any opinions expressed in this Article are those of the author and do not represent the position of any federal agency. 1 VICTOR HUGO, THE HUNCHBACK OF NOTRE-DAME 189 (Lowell Bair ed. & trans., Bantam Books 1956) (1831). 2 Michael Scott Feeley, Toward the Cathedral: Ancient Sanctuary Represented in the American Context, 27 SAN DIEGO L. REV.
    [Show full text]
  • ALLIES AGAINST ATROCITIES the Imperative for Transatlantic Cooperation to Prevent and Stop Mass Killings
    ALLIES AGAINST ATROCITIES The Imperative for Transatlantic Cooperation to Prevent and Stop Mass Killings By Lee Feinstein & Tod Lindberg MARCH 2017 CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Principal Recommendations 4 Preface 7 Findings 11 List of Acronyms 33 Recommendations at a Glance 34 Acknowledgements 36 2 SIMON-SKJODT CENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF GENOCIDE Executive Summary A generation after Rwanda and Bosnia, many of the world powers that apologized for their lack of an early and effective response to genocide during the 1990s have yet to organize themselves sufficiently to act early and effectively to prevent or stop mass atrocities. The horror of Syria is Exhibit A. As responses to past atrocity crimes show, averting and halting atrocities requires a coordinated and sustained effort by local, regional, and international actors. A multilateral response is necessary, one that the transatlantic region has a critical role to play in shaping and leading. The governments of the transatlantic community—the United States, Canada, and Europe—already devote significant resources and political capital to the prevention and amelioration of crises and conflicts, as well as to the pursuit of international development agendas. Without better cooperation among themselves and their like-minded cousins, efforts to address mass atrocities will continue to be reactive, slow, and devastating to human life and potential. Individual transatlantic countries should be involved in those efforts, each bringing its unique capacities to the table. From our vantage point as US policy experts, we believe that the United States has a particularly important role to play in encouraging greater transatlantic cooperation among states on this issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Urgent Action
    Further information on UA: 215/14 Index: 50/043/2014 Ukraine Date: 7 November 2014 URGENT ACTION MISSING EDITOR REPORTED IN ILL-HEALTH According to an anonymous source newspaper editor Sergei Dolgov, who has been missing since his abduction by armed men in June, in Mariupol, eastern Ukraine, is held in a military base and suffering from serious health issues. His wife fears for his life. Sergei Dolgov’s wife, Olga Dolgova, has told Amnesty international that her husband is reportedly currently held in the military base A1978 in Zaporizhhya. However, this information is unconfirmed, and his fate and whereabouts remain uncertain. According to Olga Dolgova’s source, who asked to remain anonymous for security reasons, Sergei Dolgov, who is 60 years old, is very weak and tends to lose consciousness constantly. The source, who was reportedly held in the same military base as Sergei Dolgov, was transferred from there two weeks ago. Olga Dolgova told Amnesty International that her husband has a heart condition and needs constant medication. Sergei Dolgov has been placed on the self-proclaimed separatist Donetsk People’s Republic‘s (Donetskaya Narodnaya Respublika, DNR) list for prisoner exchange with the Ukrainian authorities. A member of the DNR Council for the Exchange of Prisoners confirmed to Amnesty International that Sergei Dolgov has not been freed. Please write immediately in Ukrainian, Russian, English or your own language: . Calling on the authorities to immediately establish Sergei Dolgov’s fate and whereabouts, and ensure his safety and an immediate access to the medical treatment he requires; . If he is in detention, urging them to ensure his immediate access to a lawyer of his choice and charge him with a recognizable criminal offence, or immediately release him; .
    [Show full text]
  • LAW of UKRAINE on Civil Service
    LAW OF UKRAINE On Civil Service This Law defines legal and organizational principles of civil service, and conditions and procedures for the exercise of the right to civil service by citizens of Ukraine. SECTION І GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1. Terms and definitions 1. The terms listed below shall have the following meanings herein: 1) civil service shall mean professional activities of civil servants including development of proposals on state policy making, ensuring its implementation, and provision of administrative services; 2) civil servant shall mean a citizen of Ukraine holding a civil service position in any public agency of Ukraine or the Autonomous Republic of Crimea or their secretariats (apparatus); earning a salary paid from the funds of the state budget unless otherwise specified by the law; and exercising the powers specified for that position and directly related to realization of tasks and performance of functions of the public agency of Ukraine or the Autonomous Republic of Crimea as regards: development of proposals on state policy making; drafting, examination, and/or editing of draft legal acts; provision of administrative services; public monitoring and supervision; management of state property of Ukraine or the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, including management of state corporate rights; human resource management in public agencies of Ukraine or the Autonomous Republic of Crimea or their secretariats; realization of other powers (or competence) of the respective public agency; 3) an order shall mean a form of exercise
    [Show full text]
  • List of Persons and Entities Under EU Restrictive Measures Over the Territorial Integrity of Ukraine
    dhdsh PRESS Council of the European Union EN List of persons and entities under EU restrictive measures over the territorial integrity of Ukraine List of Persons Name Identifying Reasons Date of listing information 1. Sergey Valeryevich DOB: 26.11.1972. Aksyonov was elected 'Prime Minister of Crimea' in the Crimean 17.3.2014 AKSYONOV, Verkhovna Rada on 27 February 2014 in the presence of pro-Russian POB: Beltsy (Bălţi), gunmen. His 'election' was decreed unconstitutional by the acting Sergei Valerievich now Republic of Ukrainian President Oleksandr Turchynov on 1 March 2014. He actively AKSENOV (Сергей Moldova lobbied for the 'referendum' of 16 March 2014 and was one of the co- Валерьевич signatories of the ’treaty on Crimea´s accession to the Russian AKCëHOB), Federation’ of 18 March 2014. On 9 April 2014 he was appointed acting Serhiy Valeriyovych ‘Head’ of the so-called ‘Republic of Crimea’ by President Putin. On 9 AKSYONOV (Сергiй October 2014, he was formally ‘elected’ 'Head' of the so-called 'Republic Валерiйович Аксьонов) of Crimea'. Aksyonov subsequently decreed that the offices of ‘Head’ and ‘Prime Minister’ be combined. Member of the Russia State Council. 1/83 dhdsh PRESS Council of the European Union EN Name Identifying Reasons Date of listing information 2. Rustam Ilmirovich DOB: 15.8.1976 As former Deputy Minister of Crimea, Temirgaliev played a relevant role 17.3.2014 TEMIRGALIEV in the decisions taken by the ‘Supreme Council’ concerning the POB: Ulan-Ude, ‘referendum’ of 16 March 2014 against the territorial integrity of Ukraine. (Рустам Ильмирович Buryat ASSR He lobbied actively for the integration of Crimea into the Russian Темиргалиев) (Russian SFSR) Federation.
    [Show full text]
  • IFES Faqs on Elections in Ukraine
    Elections in Ukraine 2019 Presidential Election Frequently Asked Questions Europe and Eurasia International Foundation for Electoral Systems 2011 Crystal Drive | Floor 10 | Arlington, VA 22202 | www.IFES.org March 22, 2019 Frequently Asked Questions When is Election Day? ................................................................................................................................... 1 Why is this election important? .................................................................................................................... 1 What is the role of the president? ................................................................................................................ 1 What is the legal framework governing the elections? ................................................................................ 1 What is the electoral system? ....................................................................................................................... 2 Who are the candidates? .............................................................................................................................. 2 How are elections administered? ................................................................................................................. 3 Who can vote in these elections? ................................................................................................................. 4 How do citizens register to vote? ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • George W. Bush: a Neo-Conservative? Written by Mike Spaan
    George W. Bush: A Neo-Conservative? Written by Mike Spaan This PDF is auto-generated for reference only. As such, it may contain some conversion errors and/or missing information. For all formal use please refer to the official version on the website, as linked below. George W. Bush: A Neo-Conservative? https://www.e-ir.info/2015/05/25/george-w-bush-a-neo-conservative/ MIKE SPAAN, MAY 25 2015 What is Neo-Conservatism and how did this Influence American Foreign Policy during the Presidency of George W. Bush? The neo-conservative movement has been one of the most controversial in the modern post-Cold War era of International Relations (Leffler 2005 395; Williams 2005: 307). Its adherents are principally American intellectuals, writers and public servants. Despite this, much confusion still exists as to the nature of the movement and its ideas. The movement came about in the latter part of the 1960s, and garnered considerable influence since that time (Boot 2004: 21; Williams 2005: 309; Singh 2009: 34). This influence, however, remained on the fringes of policy-making until the administration of George W. Bush adopted some policies and strategies that could loosely be described as neo-conservative tenets. This paper has two distinct aims. First, to explore what neo-conservatism entails in the modern post-Cold War era and, secondly, to explore the degree to which neo-conservatives were able to influence the Bush administration. In doing so, this paper hopes to refute commonly held misconceptions about the movement and more importantly, the degree to which it was able to influence, or as some would assert, ‘hijack’ United States (US) foreign policy under President Bush (Austin 2005: 53).
    [Show full text]
  • Inside Ukraine 33
    Inside Ukraine October 16, 2014 №33 Content The Government Policy . 1 The President summed up the peace plan implementation . 1 A breakthrough in anti-corruption legislation . 3 Economic Situation . 5 Donbass losses from Russian aggression . 5 Separatists seek “energy autonomy” . 7 Political competition . 9 Diversification “Privat-style” . 9 Increasing role of Serhiy Lyovochkin . 10 Inside Ukraine 33 The Government Policy Experts’ criticism regarding presidential adminis- This issue can be resolved by identifying and punish- tration’s mistakes in information policy on Donbas ing those responsible for provocations and unrest. issues has brought positive results. Communication The Verkhovna Rada has adopted a package of between the President and citizens became more anti-corruption laws proposed by Petro Porosh- regular. Recently, he has summed up the first month enko and Arseniy Yatsenyuk. The package includes of his peace plan implementation. Stopping the en- laws on prosecutor’s office, determining final ben- emy along the frontline and decrease in the number eficiaries of legal entities, anti-corruption strategy, of casualties have become the key achievements of the National Anti-corruption Bureau and National the plan. Peaceful settlement of the conflict remains Commission for the Prevention of Corruption. On the only possible option for the President. the same day, the President established the National Nevertheless, the President took several regional Council for Anti-Corruption Policy with similar trips in order to inspect the level of defense capabil- functions as those of the National Commission. ity and made several appointments in security block. This testifies that the President and the Prime Min- Russia’s attempts to destabilize the situation in Kyiv ister will be trying to personally control the issue of using protests of radical groups and law enforcement combatting corruption.
    [Show full text]