February 2017 Newsletter

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

February 2017 Newsletter Health and Safety Oregon OSHA • February-March 2017 Volume 51 — online GOSH Conference: GOSH: How Oregon’s governors Why is the Governor’s shaped its history p. 9 Occupational Safety Going the Distance and Health Conference Meet safety director/safety consultant, Andy Collins p. 21 important? p. 6 RESOURCE Oregon Health and Safety Resource is published every other month by the Oregon Occupational Safety and Health Division of the Department of Consumer and Business Services. Department of Consumer and Business Services – Pat Allen, Director Oregon OSHA – Michael Wood, Administrator Resource editor – Aaron Corvin Design and illustration – Patricia Young DCBS editor – Mark Peterson Reprinting, excerpting, or plagiarizing any part of this publication is fine with us. Please send us a copy of your publication or inform the Resource editor as a courtesy. If you have questions about the information in Resource, please call 503-947-7428. For general information, technical answers, or information about Oregon OSHA services, please call 503-378-3272 or toll-free within Oregon, 800-922-2689. Photo: Mark Sullivan Administrator’s Features 9 GOSH: How Short takes 16 Information-sharing Safety Notes Message Oregon’s agreement aims to 6 GOSH Conference: 13 Online 19 A sander 3 Change and Why is the governors course boost workplace safety operator was stability as we Governor’s shaped its offers crushed by heavy enter 2017 Occupational history safety 17 Get ready for Safety sheeting falling Safety and Health training Break for off a forklift Conference to young Oregon important? workers 2017 Don’t miss out Ask Technical 14 Expect more changes Going the Will Oregon OSHA to fall protection Distance 4 Upcoming 12 require employers rules for construction Meet events Oregon OSHA’s 21 to electronically 18 safety 15 Online course conference coordinator Did you know? submit a summary director/safety helps employers honored for advancing Crane hazards and of their employees’ consultant, 5 protect workers workplace safety, construction rules injuries and Andy Collins from bloodborne health education illnesses to OSHA? pathogens ADMINSTRATOR’S MESSAGE 3 Change and stability as we enter 2017 Oregon OSHA Administrator By Michael Wood s we enter 2017, those of us in workplace health and safety throughout the United AStates are looking toward Washington, D.C., “We know that a presence in the workplace is a key part of our with an increased sense of curiosity … and even past success and is likely to determine our future success as well.” uncertainty. Based on past experience, it is likely to be several months before a new person is named to run federal OSHA – it may even take most of the year to get new leadership in place. In the mean- compensation premium saw a significant decrease again While some of our current rulemaking activity takes its time, several initiatives move forward, while others this year. We understand that the best way to control claims cue from federal changes, we have learned the value of have uncertain futures. Such a transition – particu- costs is to prevent the injuries from happening in the first bringing a particular Oregon perspective as we seek the larly coming after the longest tenure of any OSHA place. most effective and workable responses to such federal rules. assistant secretary – obviously raises a number of In the immediate future, we see the 2017 GOSH Conference. Other rulemaking initiatives are entirely state-initiated, questions. Like our other, smaller conferences, it provides a case study such as our ongoing effort to identify and tackle the most But here in Oregon, that uncertainty is more a matter of in the value of effective partnerships. GOSH is possible relevant out-of-date exposure limits. curiosity, because with a state program such as ours, we have only because of Oregon OSHA’s collaboration with the The changes in our nation’s capital are important ones, the freedom to chart our own course to a large extent. Much Columbia-Willamette Chapter of the American Society of course. But when it comes to charting the course of of what we do here at Oregon OSHA and in the broader of Safety Engineers, as well as through the support of the workplace health and safety in Oregon, those of use who workplace health and safety committee will move forward many GOSH sponsors and other partners. live and work here – employers, workers, and government without regard to changes and shifting perspectives on the As we look toward the 2017 legislative session, we will be – are the ones who truly control our future. And that’s as it national level. pursuing funding for additional “boots on the ground” should be. As I’ve written before, that is because we have a good sense in both enforcement and consultation. We know that a of what works. The fundamentals of workplace health and presence in the workplace is a key part of our past success safety – the need for robust hazard recognition, the need for and is likely to determine our future success as well. While a supportive system, and the importance of the hierarchy we are also seeking to increase the maximum penalties to of controls – do not change simply because an old year remain aligned with federal law, we have no plans to deviate has passed and a new year has begun. And we know that from our approach of relying primarily upon modest the balanced approach to workplace health and safety penalties and a relatively high presence in the workplace as that has marked Oregon’s course for decades continues the best approach to encouraging compliance in Oregon to pay dividends; indeed, the average Oregon workers’ workplaces. DON’T MISS OUT 4 OREGON Conference lineup Don’t GOVERNOR’S – Save these dates! OCCUPATIONAL Northwest Safety & Health SAFETY & Summit (Region X VPPPA) miss out HEALTH • May 16 – 18, 2017 • Spokane, Washington CONFERENCE Blue Mountain Occupational Safety & Health Conference MARCH 6-9, 2017 • June 5 & 6, 2017 • Pendleton The LARGEST Central Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Event Safety & Health Conference in the Northwest • September 19 & 20, 2017 • Bend oregongosh.com Southern Oregon Occupational The GOSH Conference is a joint Safety & Health effort of ASSE, Columbia-Willamette Conference Chapter, and Oregon OSHA. • October 17-19, 2017 • Ashland PUBLIC EDUCATION Education: Upcoming February and March workshops — Western Pulp, Paper, & Forest Products Confined Space Safety Klamath Falls 2/7/17 1 p m Safety & Health Conference Worker Protection Standard Medford 2/16/17 8 a m • November 28 - December 1, 2017 • Portland Hazard Communication Program – Aligned with GHS Medford 2/16/17 1 p m Safety Meetings and Committees Salem 2/22/17 8 a m Accident Investigation Salem 2/22/17 1 p m Mid-Oregon Construction Worker Protection Standard Milwaukie 2/23/17 8 a m Safety Summit February 2017 February Hazard Communication Program – Aligned with GHS Milwaukie 2/23/17 1 p m • January 29 & 30, 2018 • Bend Worker Protection Standard Eugene 3/14/17 8 a m Cascade Occupational Hazard Communication Program – Aligned with GHS Eugene 3/14/17 1 p m Excavation Safety Roseburg 3/29/17 8 a m Safety & Health Conference Hazard Identification and Control Roseburg 3/29/17 1 p m • March 5 & 6, 2018 • Eugene March 2017 March For more information: osha.oregon.gov/edu/Pages/index.aspx Oregon GOSH Conference For the most recent public education schedule updates: osha.oregon.gov/edu/Pages/workshops.aspx – will return March 2019! DID YOU KNOW? 5 Did you know datapoints:? • If you own and operate a crane on a construction site, and the crane operator is your • Under Oregon OSHA’s employee, you must comply with all Subdivision CC requirements construction rules for (the cranes and derricks standard) because you control the hazards steel erection, guardrail the crane may create systems must be capable of withstanding a force • If you operate a leased crane on a construction site, and the of at least 200 pounds leasing company tells you that the crane meets Oregon OSHA’s applied within 2 inches requirements, you cannot assume that the crane meets Subdivision of the top edge in any CC requirements You are the employer operating the crane and outward or downward you are responsible for complying with all requirements Even if the direction at any point leasing company tells you the crane meets requirements, you must along the top edge verify the claim, including by asking the company for the most recent • Where steel joists at or near columns span 60 feet or less, the joist must monthly and annual inspection reports be designed with sufficient strength to allow one employee to release the hoisting cable without the need for erection bridging • A controlling entity is an employer who has overall responsibility • All columns must be anchored by a minimum of four anchor bolts for a construction project Examples include primary contractors, Rules for landing and placing loads include the requirement that the general contractors, and construction managers • weight of a bundle of joist bridging must not exceed 1,000 pounds For more information about cranes and derricks • For more information about steel erection rules, go to osha.oregon. in construction, go to: osha.oregon.gov/OSHAPubs/4927.pdf gov/rules/Pages/division-3.aspx#subr and click on Subdivision R Quotable: What a strange sense of logic to fixate on the absence of something (injury) as a demonstration of the presence of something else (safety). Such a proposition misunderstands the dynamic of risk and being human. – Dr. Robert Long, principal and trainer at Human Dymensions 6 GOSH Conference: Why is the Governor’s Occupational Safety and Health Conference important? By Aaron Corvin It’s a place to go to refresh your commitment to maintaining a safe and healthy workplace.
Recommended publications
  • The Oregon Benchmark Experience
    ACHIEVING BETTER HEALTH OUTCOMES: The Oregon Benchmark Experience Howard M. Leichter and Jeffrey Tryens (To request a bound copy of this report, click here. To see a complete list of Milbank reports, click here. When ordering, be sure to specify which report you want, your name, mailing address, and phone number.) Table of Contents Foreword Acknowledgments Executive Summary Introduction Measuring Progress Benefits of the Oregon Approach A Short History of Oregon Shines and the Benchmarks High Hopes Disillusionment Rebuilding Using the Benchmarks State Agency Budgets and Management Benchmarks as Bridges Summing Up A Tale of Three Benchmarks Childhood Immunizations Early Prenatal Care Teen Pregnancy in Tillamook County The Benchmark Experience in Other States Learning From Oregon Oregon's Evolving System Improving the Oregon Model Conclusion Appendixes A. Benchmark Programs in Six Other States B. Oregon Progress Board Publications Notes References Foreword The development and publication of statistical indicators of the health status and well-being of populations has been increasing in the United States and internationally. These indicators still have less influence on health policy than the publication of data about leading economic indicators has on business decisions. However, indicators of health status are attracting attention among officials at all levels of government as well as among private-sector executives making decisions about such issues as where to locate or relocate operations. The state of Oregon in 1989 began to devise indicators of well-being, calling them benchmarks, as part of a long- term project to improve the economy of the state initiated by then-governor Neil Goldschmidt. The Oregon Progress Board (OPB), a public body whose members are leaders of the community, business, and government, manages the benchmarking process.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Pioneer Awards Dinner
    Portland State University PDXScholar Ernie Bonner Collection Oregon Sustainable Community Digital Library 6-3-2003 Urban Pioneer Awards dinner Ernest Bonner Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/oscdl_bonner Part of the Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Bonner, Ernest, "Urban Pioneer Awards dinner" (2003). Ernie Bonner Collection. 23. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/oscdl_bonner/23 This Speech is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ernie Bonner Collection by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Urban Pioneer Award Ernie Bonner Acceptance Speech Downtown Hilton Hotel Portland, Oregon June 3, 2003 Thanks, Neil. I needed that introduction. I was afraid that nobody would recognize me up here in this coat and t|e_- I am honored to be on the platform tonight with Tom Moyer and Nohad Toulan, to be recognized as an Urban Pioneer. Let me take a minute to thank a few of the many people who inspired and supported me. My lovely wife, Lynn. She is more than half of the two of us. And I can document that. [When the City was considering whether to hire me back in 1973, Hal Johnson wrote to Bill Scott-then in Neil's office- that his 'sources in Cleveland' described Lynn as"... a very bright and talented person involved in justice planning and administration. She is said to be a real asset to her husband." Hal's informant went on to note that 'there were also many fine things reported about Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Individuals Oregon Arts Commission Governor Arts Award Recipients
    Individuals Oregon Arts Commission Governor Arts Award Recipients - 1977 to 2007 Sorted alphabetically by last name Note: some information is not available First Name First Name (2) Last Year Governor Organization City Description Obo (d) Addy 1993 Barbara Roberts Portland African drummer and performer John Alvord 1989 Neil Goldschmidt Eugene Arts patron Pamela Hulse Andrews 2003 Ted Kulongoski Bend Arts publisher Shannon Applegate 2007 Ted Kulongoski Yoncalla Writer & lecturer Ray Atkeson 1986 Victor Atiyeh Portland Photographer Lorie Baxter 1999 John Kitzhaber Pendleton Community arts leaders Newspaper editor, community Amy (d) Bedford 1988 Neil Goldschmidt Pendleton leader & arts patron Pietro (d) Belluschi 1986 Victor Atiyeh Portland Architect Visual artist & leader in arts Eugene (d) Bennett 2002 John Kitzhaber BOORA Architects Jacksonville advocate Oregon Shakespeare William Bloodgood 2002 John Kitzhaber Festival Ashland Scenic designer Banker & collector of Native Doris (d) Bounds 1986 Victor Atiyeh Hermiston American materials Frank Boyden 1995 John Kitzhaber Otis Ceramicist, sculptor & printmaker John Brombaugh 1996 John Kitzhaber Springfield Organ builder Jazz musician & community arts Mel Brown 2002 John Kitzhaber Portland leader Richard Lewis Brown 2005 Ted Kulongoski Portland Collector & arts patron Louis (d) Bunce 1978 Robert Straub Portland WPA painter Dunbar (d) Jane (d) Carpenter 1985 Victor Atiyeh Medford Arts patrons Maribeth Collins 1978 Robert Straub Portland Arts patron First Name First Name (2) Last Year Governor
    [Show full text]
  • Tom Marsh T O T H E P R O M I S E D L A
    marsh output_Doern art 12-04-14 5:45 AM Page 1 MARSH “I am especially pleased to know that Tom Marsh has done painstaking research to bind our history in this tome; perhaps we will learn from our past and forge ahead with positive results for generations to come.” —GERRYFRANK The first comprehensive political history of Oregon, To the Promised Land TO THE PROMISED LAND also examines the social and economic changes the state has pioneered during its almost two hundred years. Highlighting major political figures, campaigns, ballot measures, and the history of legislative sessions, Tom Marsh traces the evolution of Oregon from incorporated territory to a state at the forefront of national environmental and social movements. From Jason Lee’s first letter urging Congress to take possession of the Oregon Country to John Kitzhaber’s precedent-setting third term as governor, from the land frauds of the early 20th century to the state’s land-use planning goals, from the Beach Bill to the Bottle Bill, this book tells Oregon’s story. Featuring interesting trivia, historical photographs, and biographical sketches of key politicians, To the Promised Land is an essential volume for readers interested in Oregon’s history. TOMMARSH taught high school history in Oregon for twenty-eight years. He represented eastern T O M M A R S H Washington County in the state legislature from 1975 to 1979, and has participated in numerous political campaigns over a span of nearly fifty years. He lives in Salem, Oregon. A History of Government ISBN 978-0-87071-657-7 Oregon State University Press and Politics in Oregon Cover design by David Drummond 9 7 8 0 8 7 0 7 1 6 5 7 7 OSU PRESS To the Promised Land A History of Government and Politics in Oregon Tom Marsh Oregon State University Press Corvallis For more information or to purchase the book, visit http://osupress.oregonstate.edu/book/to-promised-land To the Promised Land is dedicated to Katherine and Brynn, Meredith and Megan, and to Judy, my wife.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Use of the Paul Olum Atrium in Willamette Hall at the University of Oregon, Page 2
    Willamette Hall was dedicated on Oct. 16, 1989, in a Guidelines for Use of the Paul Olum Atrium ceremony that included in Willamette Hall at the University of Oregon Governor Neil Goldschmidt and Senator Mark Hatfield. Environmental protestors, positioned throughout the atrium, enlivened the ceremony. Willamette Hall was the centerpiece of the $45.6 million project that included Cascade Hall, Deschutes Hall, and Streisinger Hall. Funding for the four new buildings came primarily through a Department of Energy grant made possible through the work of Governor Victor Atiyeh and Senator Mark O. Hatfield. The four story atrium, named • Facility Use after UO's 13th president, Paul Olum, is one of the most 1. Willamette Hall is used for academic and research activities daily. The impressive interiors on Atrium is used by faculty and students to access classrooms and labs in the campus. At one time a science complex. In addition, UO tour groups visit the Atrium several times scientist on the Manhattan per day. Designated public walkways, as shown on the attached Atrium Map, Project that developed America's first atomic bomb, must be kept clear of furniture, electrical cords and all debris. Violation will Olum took strong stands for result in immediate corrective action, including the dissolution of the event. nuclear disarmament, against apartheid, and for increased 2. Atrium activities may not restrict the normal teaching and research state funding for higher function of Willamette Hall and other adjoining science buildings. Dinners and education. The building is other major events are allowed only after 5 p.m. on weekdays, and from 8 home to the Physics a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • River Renaissance Vision Is a Sketch of the Willamette River As Portlanders Would Like to See It in the Future
    DOCUMENT DESIGN AND ILLUSTRATION Jim Ann Carter, Graphic Illustrator II Jim Longstreth, Illustrator/Consultant Vickie Nissen, Illustrator/Consultant Gary Odenthal, GIS Coordinator Printed on Recycled Paper Second Edition BUREAU OF PLANNING 1900 SW 4th Ave., Ste. 4100 Portland, Oregon 97201 503.823.5839 [email protected] www.planning.ci.portland.or.us C1 I ◆ JANUARY 26, 2051 C2 I CITY Portland: Reflections on the River CLOSE-UP Portland’s 200th Birthday reduce the toxicity of roadway runoff The waterfront is now one of the best Continued from Page C1 reaching the river. venues to learn about and appreciate City’s Return to the River Portland and its evolution. Early use of River taxis, ferries, tour boats, and cruise the river by indigenous cultures is hon- Fifty years ago the water was fouled. Early in the century, major investments ships have also made the waterfront more ored at sites along the waterfront. Repli- Toxic substances penetrated the sedi- were made to clean up the toxics in Port- context, accommodating the river’s ex- accessible and popular. Convenient boat cas of early Portland ships and maritime Reminiscing on the legacy of ments on the river bottom, the fish were land Harbor and all but eliminate sewer panded natural and recreational func- access from waterfront destinations and museums connect Portlanders to the River Renaissance, launched at unhealthy to eat, and the banks were overflows into the river. tions and the prevention and cleanup neighborhoods is provided by access city’s river and economic heritage. Rem- the turn of the millennium lined with concrete and construction of river pollution.
    [Show full text]
  • October 3, 1979 Washington, D.C
    WITHDRAWAL SHEET (PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARIES} FORM- OF DATE RESTRICTION DOCUMENT CORRESPONDENTS OR TITLE President% Daily Diary p.2-SANITIZED FILE LOCATION RESTRICTION 66DES (A) Closed by Executive Order 12356’govetning access to national security information, (B) Closed by statute or by the agency which originated the document. I (C) Closed in accordanke with restrictions contained in the donor’s deed of gift, ; -_ _z- L .-.-- ATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINSSTRAS10N. NA FORM 1429 (8-86) -- THE ISAlL’/ DfARY 3f PREStDEtiT JIMMY CARTS? LOCAT1ON DATE MO.. Day, Yr.) THE WHITE HOUSE OCTOBER 3, 1979 WASHINGTON, D.C. TIME DAY 6:00 a.m. WEDNESDAY l-l-PHONE 6:oo The President received a wake up call from the White House signal board operator. 6:39 The President went to the Oval Office. I 7:30’ ’ 7:47 The President met with his Assistant for National Security Affairs, Zbigniew Brzezinski. 7:53 7:55 The President talked with Mr. Brzezinski. The President went to the Cabinet Room. 8:oo The President participated in a breakfast meeting with: Walter F. Mondale, Vice President Patricia R. Harris, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW) Neil Goldschmidt, Secretary of Transportation F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor Maurice E. "Moon" Landrieu, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Alonzo L. McDonald, Jr., White House Staff Director Stuart E. Eizenstat, Assistant for Domestic Affairs and Policy Jack H. Watson, Jr., Assistant for Intergovernmental Affairs and Cabinet Secretary 9:17 The President returned to the Oval Office. 9:20 9:40 The President met with Secretary of Commerce Juanita M.
    [Show full text]
  • ANN L. FISHER Attorney at Law AF Legal & Consulting Svcs 1425 SW 20 Th St., Suite 202 Portland, Oregon 97201 Telephone - 503.721 -0181 Facsimile - 503.223 -2305
    ANN L. F ISHER ATTORNEY AT LAW AF L EGAL & C ONSULTING SERVICES KAMM HOUSE 1425 SW 20 TH AVENUE, S UITE 202 PORTLAND , O REGON 97201 TELEPHONE : 503.721.0181 FACSIMILE: 503.223.2305 WWW.LAWYERS .COM /ANNFISHER ENERG LAW@AOL .COM October 21, 2004 Oregon Public Util ity Commission Administrative Hearings Division 550 Capitol Street, NE, Suite 215 PO Box 2148 Salem, Oregon 97308 -2148 Re: UM 1121 Dear Administrative Hearings Clerk: Enclosed please find an original and five copies of BOMA’s Motion to Suspend Proceedi ngs in this Docket and affidavit in Support. The parties were served by electronic distribution where electronic addresses were available, otherwise by mail. Thank you for your courtesy. Sincerely, Ann Fisher Attorney at Law ANN L. FISHER Attorney at Law AF Legal & Consulting Svcs 1425 SW 20 th St., Suite 202 Portland, Oregon 97201 Telephone - 503.721 -0181 Facsimile - 503.223 -2305 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON In the Matter of ) Case UM 1121 ) Motion to Suspend Proceedings or in the OREGON ELECTRIC UTILITY COMPANY, LLC, et ) Alternative to Condition Approval ) al. ) CONSIDERARTION BY FULL COMMISSION REQUESTED. Application for Authorization to Acquire Portland General Electric Company. Portland Building Owners and Managers Association (“BOMA”) moves to suspend the proceedings herein pending completion of various investigative and regulatory proceedings regarding Texas Pacific Group (“TPG”) with respect to this acquisition. In the alternative, BOMA moves the Commission for an Order expressly retaining sufficient legal authority after approval of the proposed acquisition to revoke, amend, or condition the sale of Portland General Electric Company (“PGE”) to Oregon Electric Utility Company (“OEUC”), a wholl y owned shell subsidiary of TPG and its investment entities.
    [Show full text]
  • 1998 Annual Leadership Symposium Proceedings
    Proceedings of The 1998 Annual Leadership Symposium Two States, One Region: The State of the Bistate Region November 20, 1998 Oregon Convention Center Portland, Oregon Hosted By: The Institute of Portland Metropolitan Studies College of Urban and Public Affairs Portland State University and Washington State University Vancouver The 1998 Annual Leadership Symposium Two States, One Region: The State of the Bistate Region November 20, 1998 Oregon Convention Center, Portland, Oregon Contents: Introduction ..............................................................................................................................3 Agenda.......................................................................................................................................5 Welcoming Remarks .................................................................................................................7 Governor John Kitzhaber.......................................................................................................11 Governor Gary Locke.............................................................................................................17 Questions and Answers with the Governors ..........................................................................21 Ethan Seltzer - State of the Region Report ............................................................................29 Neil Goldschmidt.....................................................................................................................39 William Dodge.........................................................................................................................51
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Management, Policy and Technology"
    PRO CEE J IN S- Twenty-fourth Annual Meeting Theme: "Transportation Management, Policy and Technology" November 2-5, 1983 Marriott Crystal City Hotel Marriott Crystal Gateway Hotel Arlington, VA Volume XXIV • Number 1 1983 gc <rR TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH FORUM 399 The Role of Research in Transportation Policy: The Case of Motor Carrier Regulatory Reform by Karen Borlaug Phillips* CONSIDERABLE emphasis is often and ultimately, in resolving some of placed on the need for substantive these issues is highlighted in Section research in connection with major legis- IV. Issues of continued concern are out- lative initiatives as such Research, it lined in Section V, and conclusions about .1-ias been asserted, can play a crucial role the role of research in policy-making are in determining the success or failure of presented in Section VI. a particular piece of legislation. While this undoubtedly is the case in some in- II stances, it can also be argued that the general philosophical persuasions and Federal regulation of the motor car- the overall political concerns—whether rier industry was introduced in 1935 in directly related to the issue at hand or the midst of the Great Depression not pot—of the Senators and Congressmen only to protect the trucking companies involved tend to determine the outcome. already in operation by limiting entry, This interrelationship between re- but also to protect the industry's chief search results and political concerns was competitor—the railroads—from this notably evident during the debates over rapidly growing new industry. In the motor carrier regulatory reform—both case of buses, a federal regulatory sys- truck and bus.
    [Show full text]
  • POLITICS: Pennsylvania from PROSECUTOR to POLITICIAN
    CRIME-BUSTING POLITICIANS JULY I, 1977 VOL XIII No. 13 50 cents Washington Window PANDEMONIUM IN THE POPULIST PALACE One of Jimmy Carter's ace cards in lateral Commission, can hardly hold an his drive to the White House was his intellectual candle to Henry Kissinger. image as a successful businessman. Car­ James Schlesinger's once super-heated ter,. the prosperous peanut farmer, reputation in this city has suffered would tame the federal leviathan with enormous attrition as the Administra­ thoroughgoing reorganization, zero-based tion'S energy program has been revealed budgeting and tough-minded management. to be both ineffective and politically unsalable. In all fairness to Schles­ In his firs.t months in office, Car­ inger, his problems are in many ways ter has demonstrated a fine feel for the traceable to the President's imposition public pulse on such issues as pork bar­ of an arbitrary April 20 deadline for rel spending, nuclear nonproliferation unveiling the Administration's energy and U.S. support for human rights. In program. This same presidential compUl­ his choice of issues and his skillful sion has plagued numerous Administration use of political symbolism the Presi­ domestice initiatives, including the dent has established a strong hold on econo~c stimulus package with its ill­ the electorate. Yet the same Jimmy fated tax rebate proposal and scheme to Carter who benefits from his perceived use general tax revenues and huge em­ role as moralist and visionary is now ployer .tax hikes to bailout the Social increasingly revealed as an incompetent Security system. as a manager and implementer of poli~ cies.
    [Show full text]
  • Campaign Trips (2)” of the Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 32, folder “Campaign Trips (2)” of the Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Ron Nessen donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 32 of The Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON October 21, 1976 HEHORANDm1 FOR: COUNSELLOR HARTMANN DOUGLAS J. StHTH ROBERT ORBEN VIA: GWEN ANDERSON FROH: THE RESEARCH OFFICE SUBJECT: The President's Trip to Washington, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Illinois Attached is background information for days three and four of the President's post-debate campaign swing. TAB A ~'VASHINGTON 1) Seattle 2) Washington Political TAB B OREGON 1) Portland 2) Oregon Political TAB C PENNSYLVANIA 1) Pittsburgh 2) Pennsylvania Political TAB D ILLINOIS 1) Chicago 2) Illinois Political '- On Monday, October 25, the President is scheduled to arrive at Boeing Airport, Seattle, Washington, at 11:00 a.m. It is not known who will greet the President. The arrival is closed to the public.
    [Show full text]