DOCSLIB.ORG

Onota Lake Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Onota Lake Management Plan Onota Lake Long-Range Management Plan Spring 2004 Prepared For: The City of Pittsfield Prepared By: Berkshire Regional Planning Commission 1 Fenn Street, Suite 201 Pittsfield, MA 01201 Lake Onota Preservation Association, Inc. PO Box 2884 Pittsfield, MA 01202 Onota Lake Long-Range Management Plan Spring 2004 City of Pittsfield Onota Lake Long Range Management Project Project conducted from July 2002 to June 2004 Prepared by Berkshire Regional Planning Commission and Lake Onota Preservation Association Prepared for the City of Pittsfield Funding Provided by the Berkshire Environmental Fund June 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary....................................................................................................................2 Chapter 1 - Onota Lake and its Watershed...............................................................................4 Rainfall & Climate....................................................................................................................4 Topography & Soils ................................................................................................................4 Land use...................................................................................................................................5 Macrophytes ............................................................................................................................7 Natural Heritage and Endangered Species...........................................................................7 Wetland Ecosystems ..............................................................................................................7 Water Quality ...........................................................................................................................7 Water Quality Monitoring........................................................................................................9 Sediment Accumulation .........................................................................................................9 Nutrient Budget .......................................................................................................................9 Chapter 2 – Lake Planning & Management Efforts................................................................12 Existing Documents and Plans............................................................................................13 Existing Recommendations for Lake Management ...........................................................15 Requirements under NPDES Phase II .................................................................................32 Chapter 3 - Jurisdictions & Authorities ..................................................................................36 City of Pittsfield .....................................................................................................................36 Lake Onota Preservation Association, Incorporated (LOPA) ...........................................37 Other Jurisdictions and Authorities ....................................................................................38 Chapter 4 - Development of the Onota Lake Management Plan...........................................39 Problems and Concerns .......................................................................................................39 Chapter 5 - Management Goals, Objectives & Recommended Actions...............................44 Chapter 6 - Summary of the Vision for Onota Lake...............................................................49 Five Year Action Plan............................................................................................................50 Executive Summary Onota Lake is a 617-acre lake located entirely within the City of Pittsfield. Many recreational opportunities are provided by the lake and are enjoyed by area residents as well as those visiting the Berkshires. However, like many area lakes, Onota Lake is threatened. While these problems are not unusual or atypical they do require attention. The Onota Lake Management Plan has been generated by the Lake Onota Preservation Association Incorporated (LOPA) and the Berkshire Regional Planning Commission (BRPC) with the City of Pittsfield. Funding for the development of the lake management plan was provided by the Berkshire Environmental Fund (BEF) through a Community Improvement Grant to the City of Pittsfield. The intent of the management plan is to serve as a guideline for lake management decisions in future years as the City of Pittsfield attempts to maintain the aesthetic and recreational attributes of this magnificent natural and economic resource. This plan provides background information on the lake and its watershed, a brief review of past and current lake preservation initiatives, a review of previous lake management recommendations, and a brief description of local authorities and “stakeholders”. BRPC, LOPA and the City of Pittsfield facilitated a Technical Advisory Group to: a) identify the problems and concerns experienced by lake users; b) explore alternative feasible management approaches c) develop management goals and objectives; and d) draft a proposed five year action plan to present to the City of Pittsfield Administration and City Council. The Technical Advisory Group was composed of volunteers and of people from agencies and municipalities, who were familiar with Onota Lake as well as technical and regulatory matters. Special thanks are due to the active members of the Technical Advisory Group Bob Race, Tom Armstrong, Dorothy Mara, Dick Laureyns, Jane Winn, Dennis Reagan, Jim McGrath, and Tom Matuszko. The Technical Advisory Group provided an assurance that the management plan stayed on track and was technically credible. The Technical Advisory Group met to develop the lake management plan and to discuss management goals and objectives. Finally, the short range and long range management objectives were identified and the proposed five year action plan was developed. The Technical Advisory Group considered a wide-range of problems and concerns. They did not limit their considerations to strictly water quality concerns, but rather identified concerns relative to the aesthetics, environmental quality and overall condition of the lake, both presently and projecting into the future. These problems and concerns form the basis for the development of management goals and objectives, which in turn form the basis for specific recommended management actions. The Technical Advisory Group then prioritized each of the identified problems and concerns. Identified problems and concerns included nuisance aquatic plants, drawdown/management of water level, watershed management, education and outreach, and recreation and regulations. Chapter 1 - Onota Lake and its Watershed Onota Lake is a 617-acre lake located entirely within the City of Pittsfield, (See Map 1). The watershed of Onota Lake is approximately 6,345 acres in area. Onota Lake is often described as “two lakes in one” because of the minimal water exchange between the north and south basins due to the old roadway that marked to north end of the original lake prior to the building of the dam. The outlet of Onota Lake, Onota Brook, flows southeast entering the West Branch of the Housatonic River, in Pittsfield. (Souza et al., 1991) The Housatonic River Basin 1997/1998 Water Quality Assessment Report classified Onota Lake as mesotrophic. (DEP, 1998) Onota Lake is listed on the Massachusetts Year 2004 Draft Integrated List of Impaired Waters as being impaired by exotic species (EOEA, 2004). At the present time, the water quality at Onota Lake appears to be appropriate to its uses. However, the excessive growth of exotic aquatic plants threatens recreational options and other current uses of the lake. Onota Lake’s eutrophication can be attributed to watershed urbanization and subsequent increases in sediment and nutrient loading. The most all-encompassing cause of Onota Lake’s problems are a result of excessive sediment and nutrient loading. Non-point source pollution, including erosion must be controlled. (Souza et al., 1991) Like any watershed, the Onota Lake watershed is vulnerable to the impacts of the land use patterns. The potential for accelerated sedimentation, the removal of vegetation filters and the increased pollutant loading of waterways that is associated with changing landscapes threatens the present conditions of Onota Lake. Future development within the lake’s watershed could substantially accelerate the lake’s eutrophication process. (Souza et al., 1991) Rainfall & Climate Precipitation is typically evenly distributed throughout the year and averages about 46 inches (117 cm) annually. The average monthly precipitation varies from a low of 2.7 inches (6.9 cm) in October to a high of 4.3 inches (10.9cm) in April. Much of the winter precipitation falls as snow, which averages about 75 inches (190.5cm) annually. The local climate is characterized as humid with temperatures ranging in the North Temperate Zone, with a 46 degree Fahrenheit average. (Souza et al., 1991) Topography & Soils Onota Lake is located in the Upper Housatonic River Basin, which is divided into a three-part physiographic system: the valley of the Housatonic River, which includes the main stem and its two major tributaries, the East and West branches. Elevations within the Upper Housatonic River Basin range from 2,625 feet (800m) above sea level at Brodie Mountain to 951 feet (290m) at Pittsfield. Onota Lake
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MASSACHUSETTS GUIDE Hunting, Freshwater Fishing, and Trapping Laws 2018 INNOVATION in ACTION
    MASSACHUSETTS GUIDE Hunting, Freshwater Fishing, and Trapping Laws 2018 INNOVATION in ACTION Savage Arms AXIS Series Bolt Action Rifles Federal Premium Non-Typical™ Ammunition offer turnkey dependability, accuracy & affordability Optimized soft-point bullet with a concentric jacket to provide tag-punching right out of the box so you can get hunting! accuracy and consistent, lethal wound channels on any whitetail. Calls & scents for every category of game species hunted in North America. Game cameras hunters want - reliable & simple to use, with all the functions that matter & none of the extras that don’t. Shop our tremendous selection of Firearms, Ammunition, Reloading Supplies, Hunting Gear, Optics & Accessories! Save 20% See our instant $25 FF coupon on page 50! Online! Visit ktp.com/mahunt Rte 1 Kittery, ME / Mon-Sat 9-9, Sun 10-6 / 888-587-6246 / ktp.com / ktpguns.com for details! MA_HuntRegs2017-18.indd 1 9/25/17 3:19 PM CONTENTS MASSWILDLIFE GENERAL BE SAFE, BE SEEN Director's Message �������������������������������������2 MassWildlife Office Directory ���������������������5 Office of Law Enforcement Directory �����6–7 GET YOUR ORANGE ON Licenses, Stamps, Permits, and Fees ������8–10 Marine Fisheries / Saltwater Permits �������11 Wildlife Management Zone Map ��������24–25 Massachusetts Gun Laws ��������������������������26 Recreational Vehicles ��������������������������������27 Sunrise-Sunset Table ���������������������������������28 Wildlife Lands ��������������������������������������������30 Outdoor Skills and Wildlife Education
    [Show full text]
  • Hudson River Watershed 2002 Water Quality Assessment Report
    HUDSON RIVER WATERSHED 2002 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT REPORT COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS ROBERT W. GOLLEDGE, JR, SECRETARY MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ARLEEN O’DONNELL, ACTING COMMISSIONER BUREAU OF RESOURCE PROTECTION GLENN HAAS, ACTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DIVISION OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT GLENN HAAS, DIRECTOR NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY LIMITED COPIES OF THIS REPORT ARE AVAILABLE AT NO COST BY WRITTEN REQUEST TO: MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT 627 MAIN STREET WORCESTER, MA 01608 This report is also available from the MassDEP’s home page on the World Wide Web at: http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/resources/wqassess.htm Furthermore, at the time of first printing, eight copies of each report published by this office are submitted to the State Library at the State House in Boston; these copies are subsequently distributed as follows: · On shelf; retained at the State Library (two copies); · Microfilmed retained at the State Library; · Delivered to the Boston Public Library at Copley Square; · Delivered to the Worcester Public Library; · Delivered to the Springfield Public Library; · Delivered to the University Library at UMass, Amherst; · Delivered to the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. Moreover, this wide circulation is augmented by inter-library loans from the above-listed libraries. For example a resident in Marlborough can apply at their local library for loan of any MassDEP/DWM report from the Worcester Public Library. A complete list of reports published since 1963 is updated annually and printed in July. This report, entitled, “Publications of the Massachusetts Division of Watershed Management – Watershed Planning Program, 1963-(current year)”, is also available by writing to the Division of Watershed Management (DWM) in Worcester.
    [Show full text]
  • Zebra Mussel Task Force Final Recommendations
    Zebra Mussel Task Force Final Recommendations Introduction In November 2009, the Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy & Environmental Affairs (EEA) convened the Zebra Mussel Task Force (ZMTF) to make recommendations to the Secretary of EEA on an updated action plan to address the presence of zebra mussels (ZMs) in water bodies of the Commonwealth. The Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) and Department of Fish and Game (DFG) play an essential role in protecting and preserving the natural resource of the Commonwealth in general and in particular with respect to ZMs. DCR is steward of one of the largest state parks systems in the country. Its 450,000 acres is made up of forests, parks, greenways, historic sites and landscapes, seashores, lakes, ponds, reservoirs and watersheds. DCR’s mission is to “protect, promote and enhance our common wealth of natural, cultural and recreational resources.” The DCR Lakes and Ponds Program has statewide responsibility to manage, protect, and restore the Commonwealth’s lakes and ponds. As part of this responsibility, the DCR Lakes and Ponds Program provides statewide leadership in aquatic invasive species (AIS) planning, management, technical assistance and education. The DCR Lakes and Ponds program has developed an aggressive, multi- pronged program to address the threat of AIS that includes hands-on management of AIS, training programs for citizens, boat ramp monitoring, education and outreach programs and materials, and ongoing planning and research to keep up to date on the science of AIS management. The Office of Fishing and Boating Access (OFBA) in the DFG is responsible for constructing, providing for the management of and regulating state public access facilities such as boat ramps at water bodies across the Commonwealth.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnostic / Feasibility Study for the Management of Richmond Pond
    i i i DIAGNOSTIC / FEASIBILITY STUDY i FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF i RICHMOND POND i RICHMOND / PITTSFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS i i i i i i i i i i BAYSTATE ENVIRONMENTAL i CONSULTANTS i NC i I I I I I DIAGNOSTIC/FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF I RICHMOND POND, I RICHMOND/PITTSFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS PREPARED FOR I THE TOWN OF RICHMOND AND THE CITY OF PITTSFIELD I AND THE I MASSACHUSETTS DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL I UNDER MGL CHAP. 628 I MASSACHUSETTS CLEAN LAKES PROGRAM I BY BAYSTATE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC. I 296 NORTH MAIN STREET I EAST LONGMEADOW, MASSACHUSETTS I I APRIL 1990 I I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 I Data Collection Methods 2 Diagnostic Assessment 7 Lake Description 7 I Watershed Description 7 Watershed Geology and Soils 7 Historical Lake and Land Use 18 Flow and Water Chemistry 19 I Bacteria 31 Storm Water Assessment 32 Auxiliiary Surface Water Assessment 32 I Groundwater Investigations 32 Sediment Analysis 43 Phytoplankton . • -50 I Macrophytes 50 Zooplankton 59 Macroinvertebrates 59 Fish 59 I Pond user and Residential Practices Survey 59 Comparison with Other Studies 66 Hydrologic Budget 66 I Nutrient Budgets 71 Diagnostic Summary 74 Evaluation of Management Options 77 Management Objectives 77 I Available Techniques 77 Evaluation of Viable Alternatives : 82 Recommended Management Approach 89 I Impact of Recommended Management Actions 89 Monitoring Program 90 Funding Alternatives 90 I Environmental Evaluation ' 91 Necessary Permits 91 Public Participation 91 Relation to Existing Plans and Projects 91 I Feasibility Summary 92 I References 93 I I I I I I Appendices 97 A: Field and Laboratory Methodology 97 I B: Relevant Information from MDWPC 1976 109 • C: Relevant Information from BCRPC 117 D: Relevant Information from BEL 1980 127 • Relevant Information from MDFW 1981 185 Relevant Information from SCS 1983 189 | Calculations • 201 _ H: Environmental Notification Form 211 — Meeting Summaries and Comments from Interested Parties 223 • i i i i i i i I TABLES I Page 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Taconic Physiography
    Bulletin No. 272 ' Series B, Descriptive Geology, 74 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR . UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR 4 t TACONIC PHYSIOGRAPHY BY T. NELSON DALE WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1905 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transinittal......................................._......--..... 7 Introduction..........I..................................................... 9 Literature...........:.......................... ........................... 9 Land form __._..___.._.___________..___._____......__..__...._..._--..-..... 18 Green Mountain Range ..................... .......................... 18 Taconic Range .............................'............:.............. 19 Transverse valleys._-_-_.-..._.-......-....___-..-___-_....--_.-.._-- 19 Longitudinal valleys ............................................. ^...... 20 Bensselaer Plateau .................................................... 20 Hudson-Champlain valley................ ..-,..-.-.--.----.-..-...... 21 The Taconic landscape..................................................... 21 The lakes............................................................ 22 Topographic types .............,.....:..............'.................... 23 Plateau type ...--....---....-.-.-.-.--....-...... --.---.-.-..-.--... 23 Taconic type ...-..........-........-----............--......----.-.-- 28 Hudson-Champlain type ......................"...............--....... 23 Rock material..........................'.......'..---..-.....-...-.--.-.-. 23 Harder rocks ....---...............-.-.....-.-...--.-.........
    [Show full text]
  • Lanesborough Report
    Town of Lanesborough, Massachusetts Community Resilience Building Workshop Summary of Findings JUNE 30, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Community Background 2 Community Resilience-Building Process Overview and Workshop 4 Top Hazards and Vulnerable Areas of Concern 5 Current Concerns and Challenges Presented by Hazards 6 Specific Categories of Concerns & Challenges 6 Current Strengths and Assets 8 Top Recommendations to Improve Resilience 8 Post-Workshop Implementation 13 Workshop Participants 14 Citation 15 Acknowledgements 15 Appendices 16 1 Town of Lanesborough Community Resilience Building Workshop Summary of Findings June 30, 2018 Community Background The need for municipalities to increase resilience and adapt to extreme weather events and natural hazards is becoming more evident among the communities of Berkshire County, Massachusetts, the western-most county in the Commonwealth. In general, the region is separated from the Pioneer Valley and the rest of the state by the Berkshire Highlands and the Hoosac Range that serve as its eastern boundary and by the Taconic Mountains that serve as its western boundary with upper New York State. Lanesborough is located in north-central Berkshire County and is bordered to north by New Ashford, to the east by Cheshire and Dalton, to the south by Pittsfield and to the west by Hancock. The town is 18,764 acres in size, which is approximately 30 square miles. Lanesborough is situated at the headwaters of the two major river watersheds in the county: the Housatonic River, which flows southward through Connecticut to Long Island Sound, and the Hoosic River, which flows northward into the Hudson River, which ultimately flows into the Atlantic Ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Onota Lake Invasive Species Management Plan
    Onota Lake Invasive Species Management Plan Prepared for: The City of Pittsfield By ENSR Corporation & Berkshire Regional Planning Commission Funding Provided by the Berkshire Regional Berkshire Environmental Fund Planning Commission City of Pittsfield Massachusetts Invasive Species Management Plan for Onota Lake ENSR Corporation and Berkshire Regional Planning Commission June 2005 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1-1 2.0 PAST AND CURRENT CONDITIONS .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Lake and Watershed Setting .................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Basin Morphometry and Circulation ......................................................................................... 2-4 2.3 Temperature and Dissolved Oxygen Profiles .......................................................................... 2-4 2.4 Water Quality ............................................................................................................................ 2-7 2.5 Sediments ................................................................................................................................. 2-8 2.6 Plant communities .................................................................................................................... 2-8 2.7 Animal Communities ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Observer VOLUME 35, NUMBER 1 FEBRUARY 2007 HOT BIRDS
    Bird Observer VOLUME 35, NUMBER 1 FEBRUARY 2007 HOT BIRDS On October 30, 2006, an immature Painted Bunting (left) was banded at Manomet Center for Conservation Science in Plymouth. It was photographed by Ann Graham. On November 5, 2006, Jeremiah Trimble discovered and photographed a Gray Flycatcher (above) at Danehy Park in Cambridge. This bird was seen by several others during its brief stay. Linda Ferraresso discovered an American Avocet (left) at Pikul’s Farm in Rowley on November 12, 2006, and Eric Nielsen took this photograph on November 19. On November 12, 2006, Blair Nikula discovered and photographed this stunning Scissor-tailed Flycatcher (right) in North Truro. Look for more HOT BIRDS on the inside back cover! CONTENTS BIRDING THE NORTHFIELD SOD FARM Mark Taylor and Hector Galbraith 5 MASSACHUSETTS IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS (IBAS) — THE BERKSHIRE REGION Wayne R. Petersen and Brooke Stevens 10 WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS RARITIES Seth Kellogg and James P. Smith 15 WHITE-TAILED HAWK — A TEXAS VAGRANT? Scott Surner 31 ABOUT BOOKS Dirty, Disgusting, Filthy, Lice-Ridden Boids Mark Lynch 36 BIRD SIGHTINGS September/October 2006 43 ABOUT THE COVER: Mourning Dove William E. Davis, Jr. 63 ABOUT THE COVER ARTIST: Barry Van Dusen 64 ATA GLANCE Wayne R. Petersen 65 From The Editor This is a very special — and admittedly overdue — issue of Bird Observer, devoted largely to birds and birding in central and western Massachusetts. There has been much discussion at Bird Observer over the past year about the need to include more consistent coverage of these areas. An important step in that direction was taken last April with the addition of Trudy Tynan of South Hadley to our editorial staff.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Region 1 – Western US
    ^ = Partial Bathymetric Coverage ! = New to/updated in 2011 blue = Vision Coverage * = Detailed Shoreline Only Region 1 – Western US Lake Name State County French Meadows Reservoir CA Placer Alamo Lake AZ La Paz Goose Lake CA Modoc * Bartlett Reservoir AZ Maricopa Harry L Englebright Lake CA Yuba Blue Ridge Reservoir AZ Coconino Hell Hole Reservoir CA Placer Horseshoe Reservoir AZ Yavapai Hensley Lake CA Madera Lake Havasu AZ/CA Various * Huntington Lake CA Fresno Lake Mohave AZ/NV Various Ice House Reservoir CA El Dorado Lake Pleasant AZ Yavapai/Maricopa Indian Valley Reservoir CA Lake Lower Lake Mary AZ Coconino * Jackson Meadow Reservoir CA Sierra San Carlos Reservoir AZ Various * Jenkinson Lake CA El Dorado Sunrise Lake AZ Apache Lake Almanor CA Plumas * Theodore Roosevelt Lake AZ Gila Lake Berryessa CA Napa Upper Lake Mary AZ Coconino Lake Britton CA Shasta Antelop Valley Reservoir CA Plumas ^ Lake Cachuma CA Santa Barbara Barrett Lake CA San Deigo Lake Casitas CA Ventura Beardsley Lake CA Tuolumne Lake Del Valle CA Alameda Black Butte Lake CA Glenn Lake Isabella CA Kern Briones Reservoir CA Contra Costa Lake Jennings CA San Deigo Bullards Bar Reservoir CA Yuba Lake Kaweah CA Tulare Camanche Reservoir CA Various Lake McClure CA Mariposa Caples Lake CA Alpine Lake Natoma CA Sacramento Castaic Lake CA Los Angeles Lake of the Pines CA Nevada Castle Lake CA Siskiyou Lake Oroville CA Butte ^ Clear Lake CA Lake Lake Piru CA Ventura ^ Clear Lake Reservoir CA Modoc * Lake Shasta CA Shasta Cogswell Reservoir CA Los Angeles Lake Sonoma CA
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Observer VOLUME 34, NUMBER 1 FEBRUARY 2006 HOT BIRDS
    Bird Observer VOLUME 34, NUMBER 1 FEBRUARY 2006 HOT BIRDS Phil Brown captured this image of a Selasphorous hummingbird (left) visiting Richard and Kathy Penna’s Boxford feeder. The bird remained for several weeks, and Phil Brown took this photo on November 20, 2005. On November 21, 2005, Linda Pivacek discovered a Scissor-tailed Flycatcher (right) at the Swampscott Beach Club, and Robb Kipp captured this breathtaking photo. This cooperative bird delighted many visitors over the following weeks. At Wellfleet Harbor, Blair Nikula picked out a Franklin’s Gull (left) in a large feeding flock on November 26, 2005. On December 11, Erik Nielsen took this stunning portrait of the cooperative rarity. On December 2, 2005, Gwilym Jones discovered a female Varied Thrush (right) on the Fenway in Boston. Andrew Joslin took this great photograph of this western wanderer. This bird was reported by many observers through January, 2006. CONTENTS BIRDING IN EAST BOSTON, WINTHROP, REVERE, AND SAUGUS Soheil Zendeh 5 MASSACHUSETTS IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS (IBAS) — THE SOUTH SHORE REGION Wayne R. Petersen and Brooke Stevens 26 LETTER TO THE EDITORS 32 ASUMMER AT MONOMOY Ryan Merrill 34 FIELD NOTE Latest Occurence of Arctic Tern for Massachusetts Richard R. Veit and Carolyn S. Mostello 38 ABOUT BOOKS Virtual Encyclopedia Ornithologica: The Birds of North America On-line Mark Lynch 40 BIRD SIGHTINGS September/October 2005 45 ABOUT THE COVER: Wild Turkey William E. Davis, Jr. 63 ABOUT THE COVER ARTIST: Barry Van Dusen 64 ATA GLANCE Wayne R. Petersen 465 IMMATURE NORTHERN SHRIKE BY DAVID LARSON BIRD OBSERVER Vol. 34, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Provider Name Licensing Region Street Address 1 City Zip Code
    Licensing Record Type Provider Name Street Address 1 City Zip Code Region Name 1 Root Childcare Western 63 Myron St. West Springfield 1089 Large Group 1-2-3 Grow Child Center Western 48 BARRE RD Hubbardston 01452-1208 Large Group 1-2-3 Grow Child Center Inc. Central 109 ALLEN ST Leominster 01453-2904 Large Group 1-2-3 Grow Child Center, Inc. Western 145 Mechanic St Barre 01005-1154 Large Group 123 Grow Child Center, Inc. Central 134 BURNCOAT ST. Worcester 1605 Large Group 123 Grow Child Center, Inc. Central 838 West Broadway Gardner 1440 Large Group 123 Grow Child Center, Inc. Central 341 ELM ST Fitchburg 01420-2301 Large Group 21st Century Bruce School Northeast 135 Butler Street Lawrence 1841 Large Group 21st Century Tarbox School Northeast 59 Alder Street Lawrence 1841 Large Group 5 Senses Northeast 1381 MAIN ST Reading 01867-1172 Large Group A Bright Beginning Northeast 52 TURNPIKE RD Rowley 01969-2122 Large Group A Bright Beginning Too Northeast 132 NORTH ST Danvers 01923-1242 Large Group A Brighter Future Child Care Western 83 MAIN ST Indian Orchard 01151-1103 Large Group A Brighter Rainbow Northeast 862 BOSTON RD Billerica 01821-6217 Large Group Southeast and A Child's Place Pre-School Cape 49 School St Whitman 02382-1904 Large Group A Child's View Metro Boston 56 PLEASANT STREET Dorchester 2125 Large Group A Child's View Early Learning Center Metro Boston 11 ASHMONT STREET Dorchester 2124 Large Group A Childs View Early Learning Center IV Metro Boston 618 WASHINGTON STREET Quincy 2169 Large Group A Happy Healthy Start Daycare Southeast and Preschool Cape 428 Walnut Plain Road Rochester 2770 Large Group A Kangaroo's Pouch, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices 1 - 5
    2018-20ILApp1-5_DRAFT210326.docx Appendices 1 - 5 Massachusetts Integrated List of Waters for the Clean Water Act 2018/20 Reporting Cycle Draft for Public Comment Prepared by: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Division of Watershed Management Watershed Planning Program 2018-20ILApp1-5_DRAFT210326.docx Table of Contents Appendix 1. List of “Actions” (TMDLs and Alternative Restoration Plans) approved by the EPA for Massachusetts waters................................................................................................................................... 3 Appendix 2. Assessment units and integrated list categories presented alphabetically by major watershed ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 Appendix 3. Impairments added to the 2018/2020 integrated list .......................................................... 113 Appendix 4. Impairments removed from the 2018/2020 integrated list ................................................. 139 Appendix 5. Impairments changed from the prior reporting cycle .......................................................... 152 2 2018-20ILApp1-5_DRAFT210326.docx Appendix 1. List of “Actions” (TMDLs and Alternative Restoration Plans) approved by the EPA for Massachusetts waters Appendix 1. List of “Actions” (TMDLs and Alternative Restoration Plans) approved by the EPA for Massachusetts waters Approval/Completion ATTAINS Action ID Report Title Date 5, 6 Total Maximum
    [Show full text]