Species฀accounts฀for฀high-Risk฀flora฀ And฀fauna฀in฀northwest฀alberta a Guide to Recognition, Species Issues, and Mitigation Opportunities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Species฀accounts฀for฀high-Risk฀flora฀ And฀fauna฀in฀northwest฀alberta a Guide to Recognition, Species Issues, and Mitigation Opportunities SpecieS฀AccountS฀for฀HigH-riSk฀florA฀ And฀fAunA฀in฀nortHweSt฀AlbertA A Guide to Recognition, Species Issues, and Mitigation Opportunities FIERA Biological Consulting 1 2 table฀of฀contents฀ Acknowledgements฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ 7 introduction฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ 9 fAunA Rallidae Yellow Rail 64 VERTEBRATES Gruidae AMPHIBIANS // Sandhill Crane 66 Ranidae Whooping Crane 68 Northern Leopard Frog 15 Laridae Boreal Toad 17 Black Tern 70 Canadian Toad 19 Caspian Tern 72 Ambystomatidae Forster’s Tern 74 Long-toed Salamander 21 Accipitridae REPTILES // Bald Eagle 76 Colubridae Broad-winged Hawk 78 Red-sided Garter Snake 25 Golden Eagle 80 Wandering Garter Snake 27 Northern Goshawk 82 Osprey 84 FISH // Falconidae Cottidae Peregrine Falcon 86 Spoonhead Sculpin 30 Phasianidae Cyprinidae Sharp-tailed Grouse 88 Northern Redbelly Dace 32 Scolopacidae Northern Pikeminnow 34 Upland Sandpiper 90 Catostorridae Strigidae Largescale Sucker 36 Barred Owl 92 Salmonidae Great Grey Owl 94 Arctic Grayling 38 Northern Pygmy Owl 96 Bull Trout 40 Short-eared Owl 98 Lake Trout 42 Caprimulgidae BIRDS // Common Nighthawk 100 Podicipedidae Picidae Horned Grebe 46 Black-backed Woodpecker 102 Pied-billed Grebe 48 Pileated Woodpecker 104 Western Grebe 50 Hirudinidae Pelicanidae Purple Martin 106 American White-Pelican 52 Troglodytidae Ardeidae Sedge Wren 108 American Bittern 54 Great Blue Heron 56 Anatidae Harlequin Duck 58 Trumpeter Swan 60 White-winged Scoter 62 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Parulidae florA Bay-breasted Warbler 110 introduction฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ 164 Blackburnian Warbler 112 Black-throated Green Warbler 114 NON-VASCULAR PLANTS Canada Warbler 116 Cape May Warbler 118 LIVERWORTS // Thraupidae Conocephalaceae Western Tanager 120 Conocephalum conicum 170 Pelliaceae MAMMALS // Shiny Liverwort 172 Bovidae Wood Bison 124 Calypogejaceae Calypogeia neesiana 174 Cervidae Woodland Caribou 126 Jungermanniaceae Heller’s Anastrophyllum 176 Mustelidae Lophozia ascendens 178 Fisher 128 Lophozia excisa 180 Wolverine 130 Lophozia guttulata 182 Felidae Lophozia incisa 184 Canada Lynx 132 Lophozia longidens 186 Cougar 134 Scapaniaceae Ursidae Scapania cuspiduligera 188 Grizzly Bear 136 Scapania glaucocephala 190 Vespertilionidae MOSSES // Northern Long-eared Bat 138 Sphagnaceae INVERTEBRATES Peat Moss 192 Fringed Bog Moss 194 Calopterygidae Lindberg’s Peat (Bog) Moss 196 River Jewelwing 142 Polytrichaceae Hesperiidae Pogonatum urnigerum 198 Grizzled Skipper 144 Polytrichum longisetum 200 Papilionidae Dicranaceae Hudsonian Old World Swallowtail 146 Broken-leaf Moss 202 Pike’s Old World Swallowtail 148 Splachnaceae Pieridae Yellow Collar Moss, Fairy Parasols 204 Palaeno Sulphur 150 Red Collar Moss 206 Lycaenidae Large-fruited Splachnum 208 Bronze Copper 152 Tongue-leaf Small Kettle Moss 210 Stiped (Fletcher’s) Hairstreak 154 Bartramiaceae Satyridae Bartramia pomiformis 212 Alberta Actic 156 Amblystegiaceae Chryxus (Cary’s) Arctic 158 Conardia compacta 214 Ochreous Ringlet 160 Brachytheciaceae Brachythecium reflexum 216 Cirriphyllum cirrosum 218 Hypnaceae Herzogiella turfacea 220 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS LICHENS // GRASS-LIKE (CONTINUED) // Hymeneliaceae Gramineae (Continued) Tremolecia atrata 224 Little-seed Rice Grass 278 Mycoblastaceae Slender Salt-meadow Grass 280 Mycoblastus sanguinarius 226 Cyperaceae Pertusariaceae Browned Sedge 282 Pertusaria dactylina 228 Narrow Sedge 284 Brownish Sedge 286 Baeomycetaceae Capitate Sedge 288 Baeomyces rufus 230 Beaked Sedge 290 Cladoniaceae Fox Sedge 292 Cladonia bellidiflora 232 Juncaceae Cladonia squamosa 234 Thread Rush 294 Parmeliaceae Reddish Wood-rush 296 Arctoparmelia centrifuga 236 Hypogymnia metaphysodes 238 WILDFLOWERS // Melanelia stygia 240 Orchidaceae Parmelia omphalodes 242 Spotted Coralroot 298 White Adder’s Mouth 300 Collemataceae Leptogium subtile 244 Chenopodiaceae Powell’s Saltbrush 302 Ramalinaceae Ramalina dilacerata 246 Caryophyllaceae Wavy-leaved Chickweed 304 VASCULAR PLANTS Fabaceae FERNS // Bodin’s Milk Vetch 306 Ophioglossaceae Hypericaceae Lance-leaved Grape Fern (Moonwort) 250 Large Canada St.John’s Wort 308 Polypodiaceae Brassicaceae Slender Lip Fern 252 Small Bitter Cress 310 Mountain Bladder Fern 254 Saxifragaceae Spreading Wood Fern (Shield Fern) 256 Iowa Golden Saxifrage 312 Fragrant Cliff Wood Fern 258 Scrophulariaceae Ostrich Fern 260 Purple Rattle 314 AQUATICS // Orobanchaceae Isoetaceae Russian Ground Cone 316 Northern Quillwort 262 Lentibulariaceae Najadaceae Hairy Butterwort 318 Slender Naiad 264 Plantaginaceae Potamogetonaceae Western Ribgrass 320 Floating-Leaf Pondweed 266 Asteraceae White-stemmed Pondweed 268 Herriot’s Sagewort 322 Cyperaceae Spotted Joe-pye Weed 324 Pale Bulrush 270 Tall Blue Lettuce 326 GRASS-LIKE // Low Townsendia 328 Gramineae SHRUBS // Polar Grass 272 Ericaceae Poverty Oat Grass 274 Bog Bilberry 330 Canadian Rice Grass 276 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY MAIN GLOSSARY // Definitions 332 ILLUSTRATED GLOSSARY // Parts of a moss 340 Parts of a fern 341 Parts of a sedge 342 Parts of a grass 343 Parts of a rush 344 Parts of an orchid 345 Parts of a typical flower from the Aster family 346 Parts of a regular flower 347 6 AcknowledgeMentS DMI wishes to acknowledge a variety of individuals, agencies and DMI is also extremely grateful to the many individuals and organizations organizations who significantly assisted in contributing to this that assisted this project through contributions of scientific knowledge reference product. Notably, the following assisted DMI in its funding, from their life’s work, by granting permission for use of individual species design, and delivery: images, or simply by their willingness to commit time to search their libraries for the list of images we were pursuing. We extend thanks to: · Forest Resource Improvement Association of Alberta (Open Funds Initiative –local projects) Alberta Conservation Association: Kris Kendell and Dave Fairless We thank the grant-fund review team for sharing our vision Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre: Joyce Gould, for this project. Lorna Allen and Drajs Vusjnovic · Fiera Biological Consulting Ltd., Edmonton Alberta Research Council: Steve Bradbury, Laurence Roy (Shari Clare, P.Biol.) This project and the final product was made and Jake Fisher possible through the diligent efforts, attention to detail, vision, and many long hours of dedication provided by Shari & her staff Alberta Sustainable Resource Development: Lisa Wilkinson in compiling this product for DMI. and Rick Jobin · Plumbheavy Design Inc, Edmonton BIO-DiTRL: Tony Pletcher (Gillian Harvey, M.A.) E.H. Strickland Entomological Museum: Danny Shpeley We thank Gillian and her visual communication design team for their evident skills in visual aesthetics, layout and invaluable Federation of Alberta Naturalists: Philip Penner suggestions in design elements that would ultimately assist the Native Plant Society of Saskatchewan: Garth Wruck end-users of this product. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service: Derek Johnson Royal Alberta Museum: Mark Steinhilber and David Gummer Saskatchewan Wildlife Federation: Darrel Crabbe University of Alberta: Ellen Macdonald and students, Connie Brown, Shawna Pelech, Richard Caners University of Western Ontario: Brock Fenton US Fish & Wildlife Digital Library System Jason Dombroskie Stephen Hanus Peter Stahl Individual photo credits and species-specific research citations are also included following each species account. 7 8 introduction The฀northwest฀region฀of฀Alberta฀is฀known฀to฀support฀ SPECIES SELECTION CRITERIA a฀great฀diversity฀of฀flora฀and฀fauna,฀including฀a฀large฀ One of the objectives of this project was to foster a broader appreciation collection฀of฀invertebrates฀that฀are฀understudied฀or฀have฀ among forest practitioners and the local public about the extent of not฀been฀inventoried.฀ sensitive species, in all taxa, that occur within this region of the province. Within that diversity, a number of species are considered to be more Northwest Alberta contains a distinct collection of forested natural sensitive to anthropogenic activity and habitat alteration than other regions defined by combinations of terrain, elevation, soil-type, vegetative species. Historically, extensive regulator and scientific attention has cover and moisture regime. The region also contains a blend of forested tended to focus on developing mitigative solutions for a small set of lands, aquatic/riparian habitats, aspen parkland transition, and active charismatic forest species that are of higher profile as a consequence agricultural (prairie) areas. Since historical industrial activities tend to of their “at-risk” status (endangered or threatened) and their public operate within or near all of these areas, DMI deliberately elected to appeal. Relatively limited or sporadic attention has been invested include sensitive species associated with all such areas in this reference in the broader collection of other forest species recognized to guide. This distinctly recognizes the trans-boundary nature of ecological be sensitive, rare, isolated in range, of special concern, and/or functions and species that persist within or across individual habitat types. potentially at-risk; these “high-risk” species are from a variety Additionally a number of species were included that might present debate of taxa that occur in a broad range of habitat types. One of the concerning their presence, absence, or distribution in northwest Alberta. primary objectives of this reference product is therefore to heighten Despite weak understanding of the extent of their
Recommended publications
  • Supplementary Material for Nelson, P. R., B. Mccune & D. K. Swanson
    Supplementary material for Nelson, P. R., B. McCune & D. K. Swanson. 2015. Lichen traits and species as indicators of vegetation and environment. The Bryologist 118(3): XX–XX. Supplementary Table S2. Trait matrix (alphabetical by species). “1” indicates a species possesses that trait. cladoniiform Filamentous Squamulose Cyano Erect Appressed 3D s branched Tripartite Fruticose Terricole Epiphyte Lignicole Saxicole p soredia lobules Foliose Simple foliose Green rawlin isida foliose Lichen Species Subspecies richly Only g Alectoria ochroleuca 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Allantoparmelia almquistii 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Allantoparmelia alpicola 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Allocetraria madreporiformis 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Anaptychia bryorum 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Arctoparmelia centrifuga 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Arctoparmelia incurva 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 Arctoparmelia separata 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Arctoparmelia subcentrifuga 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Asahinea chrysantha 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Baeomyces carneus 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Baeomyces placophyllus 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Baeomyces rufus 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Blennothallia crispa 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Brodoa oroarctica 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Bryocaulon divergens 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Bryoria capillaris 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Bryoria chalybeiformis 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
    [Show full text]
  • Palustriella Pluristratosa Spec. Nov. (Amblystegiaceae, Bryopsida), a New Aquatic Moss Species with Pluristratose Lamina from Switzerland
    Palustriella pluristratosa spec. nov. (Amblystegiaceae, Bryopsida), a new aquatic moss species with pluristratose lamina from Switzerland Autor(en): Stech, Michael / Frahm, Jan-Peter Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: Botanica Helvetica Band (Jahr): 111 (2001) Heft 2 PDF erstellt am: 06.10.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-73905 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092
    [Show full text]
  • Improved Conservation Plant Materials Released by NRCS and Cooperators Through December 2014
    Natural Resources Conservation Service Improved Conservation Plant Materials Released by Plant Materials Program NRCS and Cooperators through December 2014 Page intentionally left blank. Natural Resources Conservation Service Plant Materials Program Improved Conservation Plant Materials Released by NRCS and Cooperators Through December 2014 Norman A. Berg Plant Materials Center 8791 Beaver Dam Road Building 509, BARC-East Beltsville, Maryland 20705 U.S.A. Phone: (301) 504-8175 prepared by: Julie A. DePue Data Manager/Secretary [email protected] John M. Englert Plant Materials Program Leader [email protected] January 2015 Visit our Website: http://Plant-Materials.nrcs.usda.gov TABLE OF CONTENTS Topics Page Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Types of Plant Materials Releases ........................................................................................................................2 Sources of Plant Materials ....................................................................................................................................3 NRCS Conservation Plants Released in 2013 and 2014 .......................................................................................4 Complete Listing of Conservation Plants Released through December 2014 ......................................................6 Grasses ......................................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Revision and Checklist of the Moss Families Bartramiaceae and Mniaceae in Vietnam Timo KOPONEN1, Thanh-Luc NGUYEN2, Thien-Tam L
    Hattoria 10: 69–107. 2019 Revision and checklist of the moss families Bartramiaceae and Mniaceae in Vietnam Timo KOPONEN1, Thanh-Luc NGUYEN2, Thien-Tam LUONG3, 4 & Sanna HUTTUNEN4 1 Finnish-Chinese Botanical Foundation, Mailantie 109, FI-08800 Lohja, Finland & Finnish Museum of Natural History, Botany Unit (bryology), P.O. Box 7 (Unioninkatu 4), FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland 2 Southern Institute of Ecology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 1 Mac Dinh Chi, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam 3 University of Science, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, 227 Nguyen Van Cu, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam 4 Herbarium (TUR), Biodiversity Unit, FI 20014 University of Turku, Finland Author for correspondence: Thanh-Luc NGUYEN, [email protected] Abstract The genera Fleischerobryum Loeske and Philonotis Brid. of the Bartramiaceae and the family Mniaceae (excluding Pohlia Hedw.) are revised for Vietnam, based on specimens studied and literature reports. Four species are added to the flora: Orthomnion javense (M.Fleisch.) T.J.Kop., Philonotis asperifolia Mitt., P. laii T.J.Kop., P. speciosa (Griff.) Mitt. syn. nov. (based on P. mercieri Paris & Broth.), and Plagiomnium wui (T.J.Kop.) Y.J.Yi & S.He. Eight species are excluded from the flora. Two taxa are considered doubtful. The flora now includes one species of Fleischerobryum, eight species of Philonotis, one species of Mnium Hedw. (doubtful), three species of Orthomnion Wills. and five species of Plagiomnium (one doubtful). The 15 species are divided into phytogeographical elements. Eight belong to the Southeast Asiatic temperate to meridional element, and seven to the Southeast Asiatic meridional to subtropical element.
    [Show full text]
  • Prepared For: Prepared By
    NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. Overview of the Hydrostatic Test Program Northwest Mainline Expansion August 2012 APPENDIX C WILDLIFE REVIEW Page C-1 WILDLIFE REVIEW FOR THE NOVA GAS TRANSMISSION LTD. NORTHWEST MAINLINE EXPANSION HYDROSTATIC TEST WATER SOURCES, ACCESS AND BORROW PITS August 2012 7212 Prepared for: Prepared by: NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of TERA Environmental Consultants TransCanada PipeLines Limited Suite 1100, 815 - 8th Avenue S.W. Calgary, Alberta T2P 3P2 Calgary, Alberta Ph: 403-265-2885 NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. Wildlife Review Northwest Mainline Expansion August 2012 / 7212 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 METHODS ....................................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Field Data Collection ........................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Traditional Ecological Knowledge ....................................................................................... 2 3.0 RESULTS - KYKLO CREEK SECTION ........................................................................................... 3 3.1 Borrow Pit Sites ................................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Hydrostatic Test Site and Access ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Fen Communitynorthern Abstract Fen, Page 1
    Northern Fen CommunityNorthern Abstract Fen, Page 1 Community Range Prevalent or likely prevalent Infrequent or likely infrequent Absent or likely absent Photo by Joshua G. Cohen Overview: Northern fen is a sedge- and rush-dominated 8,000 years. Expansion of peatlands likely occurred wetland occurring on neutral to moderately alkaline following climatic cooling, approximately 5,000 years saturated peat and/or marl influenced by groundwater ago (Heinselman 1970, Boelter and Verry 1977, Riley rich in calcium and magnesium carbonates. The 1989). community occurs north of the climatic tension zone and is found primarily where calcareous bedrock Several other natural peatland communities also underlies a thin mantle of glacial drift on flat areas or occur in Michigan and can be distinguished from shallow depressions of glacial outwash and glacial minerotrophic (nutrient-rich) northern fens, based on lakeplains and also in kettle depressions on pitted comparisons of nutrient levels, flora, canopy closure, outwash and moraines. distribution, landscape context, and groundwater influence (Kost et al. 2007). Northern fen is dominated Global and State Rank: G3G5/S3 by sedges, rushes, and grasses (Mitsch and Gosselink 2000). Additional open wetlands occurring on organic Range: Northern fen is a peatland type of glaciated soils include coastal fen, poor fen, prairie fen, bog, landscapes of the northern Great Lakes region, ranging intermittent wetland, and northern wet meadow. Bogs, from Michigan west to Minnesota and northward peat-covered wetlands raised above the surrounding into central Canada (Ontario, Manitoba, and Quebec) groundwater by an accumulation of peat, receive inputs (Gignac et al. 2000, Faber-Langendoen 2001, Amon of nutrients and water primarily from precipitation et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Study of Bryophytes in a Subtropical Forest of Nabeup-Ri at Aewol Gotjawal, Jejudo Island
    − pISSN 1225-8318 Korean J. Pl. Taxon. 48(1): 100 108 (2018) eISSN 2466-1546 https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2018.48.1.100 Korean Journal of ORIGINAL ARTICLE Plant Taxonomy Floristic study of bryophytes in a subtropical forest of Nabeup-ri at Aewol Gotjawal, Jejudo Island Eun-Young YIM* and Hwa-Ja HYUN Warm Temperate and Subtropical Forest Research Center, National Institute of Forest Science, Seogwipo 63582, Korea (Received 24 February 2018; Revised 26 March 2018; Accepted 29 March 2018) ABSTRACT: This study presents a survey of bryophytes in a subtropical forest of Nabeup-ri, known as Geumsan Park, located at Aewol Gotjawal in the northwestern part of Jejudo Island, Korea. A total of 63 taxa belonging to Bryophyta (22 families 37 genera 44 species), Marchantiophyta (7 families 11 genera 18 species), and Antho- cerotophyta (1 family 1 genus 1 species) were determined, and the liverwort index was 30.2%. The predominant life form was the mat form. The rates of bryophytes dominating in mesic to hygric sites were higher than the bryophytes mainly observed in xeric habitats. These values indicate that such forests are widespread in this study area. Moreover, the rock was the substrate type, which plays a major role in providing micro-habitats for bryophytes. We suggest that more detailed studies of the bryophyte flora should be conducted on a regional scale to provide basic data for selecting indicator species of Gotjawal and evergreen broad-leaved forests on Jejudo Island. Keywords: bryophyte, Aewol Gotjawal, liverwort index, life-form Jejudo Island was formed by volcanic activities and has geological, ecological, and cultural aspects (Jeong et al., 2013; unique topological and geological features.
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Mosses: What Do They Tell Us About Moss Evolution?
    Bry. Div. Evo. 043 (1): 072–097 ISSN 2381-9677 (print edition) DIVERSITY & https://www.mapress.com/j/bde BRYOPHYTEEVOLUTION Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 2381-9685 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/bde.43.1.7 Fossil mosses: What do they tell us about moss evolution? MicHAEL S. IGNATOV1,2 & ELENA V. MASLOVA3 1 Tsitsin Main Botanical Garden of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia 2 Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia 3 Belgorod State University, Pobedy Square, 85, Belgorod, 308015 Russia �[email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1520-042X * author for correspondence: �[email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6096-6315 Abstract The moss fossil records from the Paleozoic age to the Eocene epoch are reviewed and their putative relationships to extant moss groups discussed. The incomplete preservation and lack of key characters that could define the position of an ancient moss in modern classification remain the problem. Carboniferous records are still impossible to refer to any of the modern moss taxa. Numerous Permian protosphagnalean mosses possess traits that are absent in any extant group and they are therefore treated here as an extinct lineage, whose descendants, if any remain, cannot be recognized among contemporary taxa. Non-protosphagnalean Permian mosses were also fairly diverse, representing morphotypes comparable with Dicranidae and acrocarpous Bryidae, although unequivocal representatives of these subclasses are known only since Cretaceous and Jurassic. Even though Sphagnales is one of two oldest lineages separated from the main trunk of moss phylogenetic tree, it appears in fossil state regularly only since Late Cretaceous, ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Toad Taxonomy Description
    WESTERN TOAD TAXONOMY Scientific name: Bufo boreas (Baird and Girard, 1852) Common name: Western toad Family: Bufonidae Taxonomic comments: Hybridizes with the red-spotted toad (Bufo punctatus) at Darwin Falls, Inyo County, California, and sometimes with Canadian toad (B. hemiophrys) in central Alberta. B. nelsoni was formerly included in this species. Molecular data indicate that B.exsul is phylogenetically nested within B. canorus; further data are needed to determine whether B. exsul should be subsumed with B. canorus (Shaffer et al. 2000). "Stephens (2001) examined mitochondrial DNA from 8 Yosemite toads (selected from the samples examined by Shaffer et al. (2000) to represent the range of variability found in that study) and 173 western toads. Stephens' data indicate that Bufo in the Sierra Nevada occur in northern and southern evolutionary groups, each of which include both Yosemite and western toads (i.e., toads of both species are more closely related to each other within a group than they are to members of their own species in the other group). Further genetic analysis of Yosemite toads sampled from throughout their range, and from other toad species surrounding their range is needed to fully understand the evolutionary history and appropriate taxonomic status of the Yosemite toad." (USFWS 2002). DESCRIPTION Basic description: A toad. General description: A chunky, short-legged, warty amphibian with dominant parotoid glands at the back of the head and a conspicuous light-colored stripe running down the middle of the back. Coloration varies from brown, green to gray above and white with dark mottling below. Females are usually larger, more blotched, and have rougher skin than males (Hodge 1976, MacDonald 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Life Magill’S Encyclopedia of Science
    MAGILLS ENCYCLOPEDIA OF SCIENCE PLANT LIFE MAGILLS ENCYCLOPEDIA OF SCIENCE PLANT LIFE Volume 4 Sustainable Forestry–Zygomycetes Indexes Editor Bryan D. Ness, Ph.D. Pacific Union College, Department of Biology Project Editor Christina J. Moose Salem Press, Inc. Pasadena, California Hackensack, New Jersey Editor in Chief: Dawn P. Dawson Managing Editor: Christina J. Moose Photograph Editor: Philip Bader Manuscript Editor: Elizabeth Ferry Slocum Production Editor: Joyce I. Buchea Assistant Editor: Andrea E. Miller Page Design and Graphics: James Hutson Research Supervisor: Jeffry Jensen Layout: William Zimmerman Acquisitions Editor: Mark Rehn Illustrator: Kimberly L. Dawson Kurnizki Copyright © 2003, by Salem Press, Inc. All rights in this book are reserved. No part of this work may be used or reproduced in any manner what- soever or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy,recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the copyright owner except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. For information address the publisher, Salem Press, Inc., P.O. Box 50062, Pasadena, California 91115. Some of the updated and revised essays in this work originally appeared in Magill’s Survey of Science: Life Science (1991), Magill’s Survey of Science: Life Science, Supplement (1998), Natural Resources (1998), Encyclopedia of Genetics (1999), Encyclopedia of Environmental Issues (2000), World Geography (2001), and Earth Science (2001). ∞ The paper used in these volumes conforms to the American National Standard for Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, Z39.48-1992 (R1997). Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Magill’s encyclopedia of science : plant life / edited by Bryan D.
    [Show full text]
  • 1307 Fungi Representing 1139 Infrageneric Taxa, 317 Genera and 66 Families ⇑ Jolanta Miadlikowska A, , Frank Kauff B,1, Filip Högnabba C, Jeffrey C
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 79 (2014) 132–168 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families ⇑ Jolanta Miadlikowska a, , Frank Kauff b,1, Filip Högnabba c, Jeffrey C. Oliver d,2, Katalin Molnár a,3, Emily Fraker a,4, Ester Gaya a,5, Josef Hafellner e, Valérie Hofstetter a,6, Cécile Gueidan a,7, Mónica A.G. Otálora a,8, Brendan Hodkinson a,9, Martin Kukwa f, Robert Lücking g, Curtis Björk h, Harrie J.M. Sipman i, Ana Rosa Burgaz j, Arne Thell k, Alfredo Passo l, Leena Myllys c, Trevor Goward h, Samantha Fernández-Brime m, Geir Hestmark n, James Lendemer o, H. Thorsten Lumbsch g, Michaela Schmull p, Conrad L. Schoch q, Emmanuël Sérusiaux r, David R. Maddison s, A. Elizabeth Arnold t, François Lutzoni a,10, Soili Stenroos c,10 a Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0338, USA b FB Biologie, Molecular Phylogenetics, 13/276, TU Kaiserslautern, Postfach 3049, 67653 Kaiserslautern, Germany c Botanical Museum, Finnish Museum of Natural History, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland d Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, 358 ESC, 21 Sachem Street, New Haven, CT 06511, USA e Institut für Botanik, Karl-Franzens-Universität, Holteigasse 6, A-8010 Graz, Austria f Department of Plant Taxonomy and Nature Conservation, University of Gdan´sk, ul. Wita Stwosza 59, 80-308 Gdan´sk, Poland g Science and Education, The Field Museum, 1400 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Occupancy of Two Endemic Stream Frogs in Different Forest Types in Pakistan
    Herpetological Conservation and Biology 15(3):506–511. Submitted: 13 March 2020; Accepted: 9 September 2020; Published: 16 December 2020. SITE OCCUPANCY OF TWO ENDEMIC STREAM FROGS IN DIFFERENT FOREST TYPES IN PAKISTAN WASEEM AHMED1, MUHAMMAD RAIS, MUHAMMAD SAEED, AYESHA AKRAM, IMTIAZ AHMAD KHAN, AND SUMBUL GILL Herpetology Lab, Department of Wildlife Management, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan 1Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract.—We identified the habitats where Murree Hills Frog (Nanorana vicina) and Hazara Torrent Frog (Allopaa hazarensis) are most likely to occur in Pakistan, and examined how their occurrence at a particular stream or water body is influenced by site and survey covariates. Although these two frog species are listed as Least Concern in the Red List of Threatend Species by the International Union for Conservation of Nature, major conservation threats to these species in Pakistan include habitat degradation, urbanization, and climate change. We made visits to 69 sites during the 2-y study period (June 2016 to July 2018) in three forest types of Islamabad Capital Territory, District Rawalpindi (Province Punjab) and District Abbottabad, (Province Khyber Pakhtunkhwa), Pakistan. We found Murree Hills Frog at 51% of sites, and Hazara Torrent Frog at 30% of sites. Our logistic regression model explained 78.0% of the variance in Murree Hills Frog occurrence and correctly classified 87% of the cases. Increased elevation and availability of permanent water were associated with an increased likelihood of occurrence of this species. The logistic regression model explained 51.0% of the variance in Hazara Torrent Frog occurrence and correctly classified 70% of the cases.
    [Show full text]