Case-Control Study Ofprescribed Fenoterol

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Case-Control Study Ofprescribed Fenoterol 170 Thorax 1990;45:170-175 Case-control study of prescribed fenoterol and death from asthma in New Zealand, 1977-81 Thorax: first published as 10.1136/thx.45.3.170 on 1 March 1990. Downloaded from N Pearce, J Grainger, M Atkinson, J Crane, C Burgess, C Culling, H Windom, R Beasley Abstract A recent New Zealand case-control study,' A previous New Zealand case-control conducted by our group, tested the hypothesis study of asthma deaths in the 5-45 year that the unsupervised self administration of age group during 1981-3 found that pres- fenoterol by inhalation increases the risk of cription of fenoterol (by metered dose death from asthma. This hypothesis arose inhaler) was associated with an increased primarily from epidemiological evidence link- risk of death in patients with severe ing the sale of fenoterol to the epidemic of asthma. One major criticism ofthis study deaths from asthma that New Zealand has was that drug data for the cases and experienced since the late 1970s,' 2 and controls came from different sources. A experimental evidence that fenoterol is a less new case-control design has been used to selective beta2 agonist than salbutamol, the evaluate the same hypothesis, with a dif- most commonly used beta agonist.3 The possi- ferent set of asthma deaths, the same ble mechanisms ofaction remain to be clarified, source for drug information being used but several potential mechanisms are apparent; for both cases and controls. This depen- these depend on whether the association is with ded on identifying deaths from asthma long term use of fenoterol or use in the acute during 1977-81 from national mortality attack. Long term use may be associated with records, and ascertaining which patients tachyphylaxis, as was suggested with isopren- from those who died had been admitted to aline,4 or with increases in airway hyperrespon- a major hospital for asthma during the 12 siveness following beta agonist treatment,5 months before death. The study was con- which may lead to more severe asthma. fined to this subgroup, which accounted Repeated self administration of high doses of a for about 20% of all asthma deaths in the longer acting and less selective beta2 agonist areas served by a major hospital. For each during an acute attack could result in delay in of the eligible patients who died four age seeking medical advice,6 hypokalaemia,7 and matched controls were selected from adverse cardiac effects,3 particularly when http://thorax.bmj.com/ patients admitted to hospital for asthma hypoxaemia is present.8 Hypoxaemia may be during the year that the death occurred made worse because beta agonists may disturb who had also had an admission for ventilation-perfusion relationships.9 asthma in the previous 12 months. For the The previous study related to the period 58 cases and 227 control subjects informa- August 1981-July 1983, and compared the tion on prescribed drugs was collected prescribed drug treatment ofpatients who died from the hospital records relating to the of asthma with that of patients with severe previous admission. The odds ratio of asthma who did not die. The findings were on October 4, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. asthma death in patients prescribed consistent with the hypothesis that inhaled inhaled fenoterol was 1-99 (95% con- fenoterol increases the risk of death in patients fidence interval 112-3-55, p = 0 02). As in with severe asthma. We could not, however, the previous study, subgroups defined by exclude all possible sources ofbias, particularly markers of chronic asthma severity were as information on prescribed asthma drugs was Department of also considered. The inhaled fenoterol obtained from different sources for the cases Community Health odds ratio was 2-98 (95% CI 1-15-7 70, p = and controls. We have now examined the N Pearce in three or more further in a study of deaths from C Culling 0 02) patients prescribed hypothesis categories of asthma drugs, 3-91 (95% CI asthma in New Zealanders aged 5-45 years Department of Medicine, Wellington 179-8 54, p < 0-01) in patients with a during 1977-81. Information on drugs pres- School ofMedicine, previous admission for asthma in the past cribed for asthma has been obtained from the Wellington, New 12 months, and 5 83 (95% CI 1-62-21-0, p = same sources for both cases and controls, the Zealand J Grainger 0-01) in patients prescribed oral cortico- major potential source of bias in the previous M Adtinson steroids at the time of admission. In study thus being avoided. J Crane patients with the most severe asthma C Burgess H Windom (defined by a previous admission for R Beasley asthma during the past 12 months and Methods Address for reprint requests: prescribed oral corticosteroids at time of Dr N Pearce, Departnent of admission) the inhaled fenoterol odds SELECTION OF SUBJECTS Community Health, < Cases The cases all Wellington School of ratio was 9-82 (95% CI 2-23-43 4, p 0 01). potential comprised Medicine, PO Box 7343 These findings add further support to the patients aged 5-45 years who died from asthma Wellington South, New in the Zealand hypothesis that inhaled fenoterol in- New Zealand during period January with 1977-July 1981, and who had been admitted Accepted 13 November creases the risk of death in patients 1989. severe asthma. for asthma to a major hospital during the 12 Case control study ofprescribedfenoterol and deathfrom asthma in New Zealand, 1977-81 171 months before death. The study was confined tion that identified cases and controls was to those aged 5-45 years as before,' as death deleted. Two members of the study team (CB from asthma is a reasonably clearcut diagnosis and JC) then made a blind assessment of the in this age range.'0 Asthma deaths (ICD code drugs at admission and discharge. In one case were identified and six controls no information was available 493) from registrations at the Thorax: first published as 10.1136/thx.45.3.170 on 1 March 1990. Downloaded from National Health Statistics Centre. For each on the drugs at discharge, and they were death the records of hospitals to which the assumed to be the same as the drugs at admis- patient was likely to have been admitted in an sion. Information from subsequent chest clinic acute attack were then searched to identify any and outpatient visits was available for some admission for asthma in the previous 12 cases and controls, but this was relatively months. Ifsuch an admission was identified the incomplete. Thus, unless otherwise specified, death was included in the study, and the all findings refer to -drugs prescribed at dis- admission closest to the date of death was used. charge. The- study was based on the same major hos- As in the previous study, the possibility of pitals that we used in the previous study, with confounding or effect modification by severity the exception of Dunedin Public Hospital, for was assessed by considering various subgroups which ethical approval to examine the records defined by markers of chronic severity: (1) was not obtained. As before, admissions to prescription of three of more categories of smaller hospitals were not considered. asthma drugs (oral or aerosolised beta agonists, Controls For each case potential controls, nebulised beta agonists, theophyllines, sodium matched for age within five years, were selected cromoglycate or inhaled corticosteroids, oral at random from patients discharged from the corticosteroids); (2) a hospital admission for same hospital with the diagnosis of asthma in asthma during the previous 12 months (that is, the year in which the death occurred. The in the 12 months before the admission when the admission records for each potential control prescribed medication was recorded); (3) pre- were then examined to determine whether the scription of oral corticosteroids. When dis- patient had had a previous hospital admission charged most patients were taking several for asthma during the 12 months before the drugs, including oral corticosteroids. Thus we admission under consideration. If such an considered it most appropriate to define admission was found the patient was included chronic severity in terms of the drugs being as a control. For each case the first four controls prescribed at the time of admission. As before, meeting this criterion were selected. If suf- the main drug treatment of interest (fenoterol ficient controls could not be obtained the and other asthma drugs) related to the drugs acceptable age range was widened to 10 years. prescribed at discharge. For seven cases with an admission to hospitals in Auckland, Christchurch, or Hamilton insuf- DATA ANALYSIS ficient controls were available and 22 of their The Mantel-Haenszel procedure" was used to http://thorax.bmj.com/ controls were selected from another hospital in calculate odds ratios and test based confidence the same area. For all cases and controls the intervals (CI),'2 and Rothman's adaptation of admission was considered to have been this procedure'3 was used to perform a matched primarily for asthma, as indicated by the dis- analysis. Logistic regression'4 was also used to charge coding. calculate odds ratios adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, and other potential confounders. INFORMATION ON PRESCRIBED DRUGS For both cases on and controls information on October 4, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. prescribed drugs for self administration was Results extracted from records relating to the previous Death registrations were identified from adtiission-that is, the admission within the 12 National Health Statistics Centre records for months before death for the cases and the 366 New Zealand residents with a recorded corresponding prior admission for the control address and aged 5-45 years who died from subjects.
Recommended publications
  • Application Number
    CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: 203975s000 SUMMARY REVIEW SUMMARY REVIEW OF REGULATORY ACTION Date: November 26, 2013 From: Badrul A. Chowdhury, MD, PhD Director, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Rheumatology Products, CDER, FDA Subject: Division Director Summary Review NDA Number: 20-3975 Applicant Name: GlaxoSmithKline Date of Submission: December 18, 2012 PDUFA Goal Date: December 18, 2013 Proprietary Name: Anoro Ellipta Established Name: Umeclidinium and vilanterol Dosage form: Inhalation Powder (inhaler contains 2 double-foil blister strips, each with 30 blisters containing powder for oral inhalation) Strength: Umeclidinium 62.5 mcg per blister and vilanterol 25 mcg per blister Proposed Indications: Maintenance treatment of airflow obstruction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Action: Approval 1. Introduction GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) submitted this 505(b)(1) new drug application for use of Anoro Ellipta (umeclidinium 62.5 mcg and vilanterol 25 mcg inhalation powder) for long-term once-daily maintenance bronchodilator treatment of airflow obstruction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The proposed dose is one inhalation (umeclidinium 62.5 mcg and vilanterol 25 mcg) once daily. The application is based on clinical efficacy and safety studies. This summary review will provide an overview of the application, with a focus on the clinical efficacy and safety studies. 2. Background There are several drug classes available for the relief of airflow obstruction in patients with COPD. These include short- and long-acting beta-2 adrenergic agonists, short- and long-acting anticholinergics, combination products containing beta-2 adrenergic agonists and anticholinergics, combination of long-acting beta-2 adrenergic agonists and corticosteroids, methylxanthines, and phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitors.
    [Show full text]
  • Orciprenaline Sulphate (Alupent): Planned Withdrawal from the UK Market Following a Risk-Benefit Analysis
    MHRA PUBLIC ASSESSMENT REPORT Orciprenaline sulphate (Alupent): planned withdrawal from the UK market following a risk-benefit analysis November 2009 Executive summary 2 1. Introduction 3 2. Summary of data 3 2.1 Clinical pharmacology 3 2.2 Efficacy 3 2.3 Safety 4 3. Conclusions 8 4. References 9 5. Glossary 10 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (Please note that this summary is intended to be accessible to all members of the public, including health professionals) Background The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is the government agency responsible for regulating the effectiveness and safety of medicines and medical devices in the UK. We continually review the safety of all medicines in the UK, and inform healthcare professionals and the public of the latest safety updates. In our Public Assessment Reports, we discuss the evidence for a safety issue with a particular drug or drug class, and changes made to the product information for the drug on the basis of this evidence, which will help safeguard public health. This MHRA Public Assessment Report discusses a review of the risks and benefits of a medicine called orciprenaline sulphate. Orciprenaline sulphate is available for oral administration as a syrup used to treat reversible airways obstructiona, which is a symptom of asthmab and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseasec. It acts on specific areas in the body called β- receptors, which relaxes the muscles used for breathing and opens the airways in the lungs. Orciprenaline sulphate was licensed in 1972 and is marketed in the UK under the brand name Alupent Syrup. As with any medicine, the use of orciprenaline sulphate may lead to adverse reactions (side-effects) in some individuals, which are described in the product information, including the patient information leaflet (see the Electronic Medicines Compendium (product information) website).
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics of Bronchodilators
    1521-0081/12/6403-450–504$25.00 PHARMACOLOGICAL REVIEWS Vol. 64, No. 3 Copyright © 2012 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 4580/3762238 Pharmacol Rev 64:450–504, 2012 ASSOCIATE EDITOR: DAVID R. SIBLEY Pharmacology and Therapeutics of Bronchodilators Mario Cazzola, Clive P. Page, Luigino Calzetta, and M. Gabriella Matera Department of Internal Medicine, Unit of Respiratory Clinical Pharmacology, University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata,’ Rome, Italy (M.C., L.C.); Department of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, San Raffaele Pisana Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Rome, Italy (M.C., L.C.); Sackler Institute of Pulmonary Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King’s College London, London, UK (C.P.P., L.C.); and Department of Experimental Medicine, Unit of Pharmacology, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy (M.G.M.) Abstract............................................................................... 451 I. Introduction: the physiological rationale for using bronchodilators .......................... 452 II. ␤-Adrenergic receptor agonists .......................................................... 455 A. A history of the development of ␤-adrenergic receptor agonists: from nonselective ␤ Downloaded from adrenergic receptor agonists to 2-adrenergic receptor-selective drugs.................... 455 ␤ B. Short-acting 2-adrenergic receptor agonists........................................... 457 1. Albuterol........................................................................ 457
    [Show full text]
  • Salmeterol Enhances the Cardiac Response to Gene Therapy in Pompe Disease
    Salmeterol enhances the cardiac response to gene therapy in Pompe disease Sang-oh Han1, Songtao Li1, and Dwight D. Koeberl1* 1Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC *To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Box 103856, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710. Running title: Small molecules for Pompe disease Page 2 ABSTRACT Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with recombinant human (rh) acid -glucosidase (GAA ) has prolonged the survival of patients. However, the paucity of cation-independent mannose-6- phosphate receptor (CI-MPR) in skeletal muscle, where it is needed to take up rhGAA, correlated with a poor response to ERT by muscle in Pompe disease. Clenbuterol, a selective 2 receptor agonist, enhanced the CI-MPR expression in striated muscle through Igf-1 mediated muscle hypertrophy, which correlated with increased CI-MPR (also the Igf-2 receptor) expression. In this study we have evaluated 4 new drugs in GAA knockout (KO) mice in combination with an adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector encoding human GAA, 3 alternative 2 agonists and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA). Mice were injected with AAV2/9-CBhGAA (1E+11 vector particles) at a dose previously found to be partially effective at clearing glycogen storage from the heart. Heart GAA activity was significantly increased by either salmeterol (p<0.01) or DHEA (p<0.05), in comparison with untreated mice. Furthermore, glycogen content was reduced in the heart by treatment with DHEA (p<0.001), salmeterol (p<0.05), formoterol (p<0.01), or clenbuterol (p<0.01) in combination with the AAV vector, in comparison with untreated GAA-KO mice.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Review
    PROJECT REVIEW ”Development of analytical methods for the quantitative determination of beta-agonists and determination of detection times after therapeutic use” Beta-agonists are substances frequently used for the treatment of asthma. These drugs are most frequently administered by inhalation of aerosol, powder or nebulised solution. Besides the main pharmacological effect, at higher doses, side effects of the use of these products result in anabolic action. Hence, beta-2- agonists might be misused for their stimulating effect on respiration and growth promoting action when administered in higher doses. As a result, WADA has prohibited the use of these drugs in sports. Exceptions are formoterol, salbutamol, fenoterol, salmeterol and terbutaline which can be used by athletes if a proper medical justification (TUE) is issued. Although this group of medication is frequently declared by athletes on the doping control forms these substances are not always detected. In addition, no minimum required performance levels (MRPL) for laboratories have been presently issued by WADA. Information about the excretion of beta-2-agonists in urine after the use by different administration routes could result in the establishment of MRPL levels based upon scientific evidence. Therefore this project will focus on the administration of different beta-2-agonists by different administration routes. In this project 5 beta-2-agonists will be administered (i.e. salbutamol, formoterol, fenoterol, salmeterol and terbutaline) of which 2 of them will be administered both by inhalation and orally. All these studies will be conducted following a strict research protocol as approved by an ethical committee. As the supposed outcome of this research is a MRPL level, the first step of this project is to develop and validate quantitative analytical methods for all administered beta-2-agonists (except salbutamol for which these methods already exist).
    [Show full text]
  • Dry Powder Inhalers Comprising a Carrier Other Than Lactose
    (19) TZZ Z T (11) EP 2 682 097 A2 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION (43) Date of publication: (51) Int Cl.: 08.01.2014 Bulletin 2014/02 A61K 9/00 (2006.01) A61K 9/14 (2006.01) A61K 31/40 (2006.01) A61K 31/439 (2006.01) (2006.01) (21) Application number: 13175077.0 A61K 31/4704 (22) Date of filing: 04.07.2013 (84) Designated Contracting States: • Türkyilmaz, Ali AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB 34460 Istanbul (TR) GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO • Mutlu, Onur PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR 34460 Istanbul (TR) Designated Extension States: BA ME (74) Representative: Sevinç, Erkan Istanbul Patent & Trademark (30) Priority: 05.07.2012 TR 201207842 Consultancy Ltd. Plaza 33, Buyukdere Cad. No: 33/16 (71) Applicant: Arven Ilac Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. Sisli Istanbul 34460 (TR) 34381 Istanbul (TR) (72) Inventors: • Cifter, Ümit 34460 Istanbul (TR) (54) Dry Powder Inhalers Comprising A Carrier Other Than Lactose (57) This invention relates to novel pharmaceutical other obstructive airways diseases. In addition, the compositions for inhalation comprising separately, se- present invention relates to novel pharmaceutical com- quentially or together, drugs having amine in the form of position for inhalation based on combinations of long act- a dry powder in admixture with a pharmaceutically ac- ing muscarinic antagonists, long acting beta agonists, ceptable carrier, other than lactose, and its use in the short acting beta-2 agonists, corticosteroids or a combi- treatment of respiratory condition selected from asthma nation of two or more of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Fenoterol Hydrobromide May Be Given from a Фенотерол of Short-Acting Beta2 Agonists in the Previous 1 to 5 Years
    Clenbuterol Hydrochloride/Fenoterol 1121 struction. Etamiphylline does not liberate theophylline in the Adverse Effects and Precautions 11. Sears MR, Taylor DR. The β -agonist controversy: observa- body. Etamiphylline camsilate is used in veterinary medicine. tions, explanations and relationship to asthma epidemiology. As for Salbutamol, p.1131. Drug Safety 1994; 11: 259–83. The hydrochloride salt has also been used. 12. Fuller RW. Use of β agonists in asthma: much ado about noth- Increased mortality. Since the introduction of metered-dose ing? BMJ 1994; 309: 795–6. Preparations aerosols of beta agonists there have been two reported epidemics 13. Sears MR. Asthma deaths in New Zealand. Lancet 1995; 345: Proprietary Preparations (details are given in Part 3) of increased morbidity and mortality in asthmatic patients asso- 655–6. Spain: Solufilina. ciated with their use. The first occurred in the 1960s and was 14. Tattersfield AE. Use of β agonists in asthma: much ado about linked with the use of high-dose isoprenaline inhalers.1 The use nothing? BMJ 1994; 309: 794–5. 15. Lanes SF, et al. Respiratory medications and risk of asthma of isoprenaline was subsequently largely stopped in favour of death. Thorax 2002; 57: 683–6. more selective beta2 agonists. 16. Anderson HR, et al. Bronchodilator treatment and deaths from Etofylline (BAN, rINN) The second epidemic occurred in New Zealand in the late 1970s asthma: case-control study. Abridged version: BMJ 2005; 330: 1-5 117. Full version: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/reprint/330/7483/117 Aethophyllinum; Etofilina; Etofilinas; Etofillin; Etofylin; Etofylliini; and 1980s and was associated with the use of fenoterol.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Discipline Review
    CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: 210595Orig1s000 MULTI-DISCIPLINE REVIEW Summary Review Office Director Cross Discipline Team Leader Review Clinical Review Non-Clinical Review Statistical Review Clinical Pharmacology Review NDA/BLA Multi‐disciplinary Review and Evaluation {NDA 210595} {Duaklir Pressair, Aclidinium Bromide/Formoterol Fumarate inhalation powder} NDA/BLA Multi‐Disciplinary Review and Evaluation Application Type NDA Application Number(s) 210595 Priority or Standard Standard Submit Date(s) May 31, 2018 Received Date(s) May 31, 2018 PDUFA Goal Date March 31, 2019 Division/Office Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Rheumatology Products Review Completion Date March 29, 2019 Established/Proper Name Aclidinium bromide/formoterol fumarate inhalation powder (Proposed) Trade Name Duaklir Pressair Pharmacologic Class Long‐acting muscarinic/Long‐acting B2‐agonist Code name Applicant AstraZenecaPharmaceuticals LP Doseage form Inhalation powder Applicant proposed Dosing One inhalation (400 µg aclidinium bromide/ 12 µg formoterol Regimen fumarate) twice daily Applicant Proposed ‐ (b) (4) maintenance treatment of (b) (4) Indication(s)/Population(s) patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), (b) (4) Recommendation on Approval Regulatory Action Recommended (b) (4) maintenance treatment of patients with COPD Indication(s)/Population(s) (if applicable) Recommended Dosing One inhalation (400 µg aclidinium bromide/ 12 µg formoterol Regimen fumarate) twice daily 1 Version date: September 12, 2018 Reference
    [Show full text]
  • List Item Short-Acting Beta-Agonists Article-31 Referral
    Annex II Scientific conclusions and grounds for revocation or variation as applicable to the terms of the marketing authorisations and detailed explanation for the differences from the PRAC recommendation 19 Scientific conclusions and grounds for revocation or variation as applicable to the terms of the marketing authorisations and detailed explanation for the differences from the PRAC recommendation The CMDh considered the below PRAC recommendation dated 5 September 2013 with regards to the terbutaline, salbutamol, hexoprenaline, ritodrine, fenoterol and isoxsuprine containing medicinal products: 1. Overall summary of the scientific evaluation of terbutaline, salbutamol, hexoprenaline, ritodrine, fenoterol and isoxsuprine containing medicinal products by PRAC (see Annex I) On 27 November 2012, further to evaluation of data resulting from pharmacovigilance activities, Hungary informed the European Medicines Agency, pursuant to Article 31 of Directive 2001/83/EC, of their consideration that the risk-benefit balance of short-acting beta-agonists (SABAs) containing medicinal products authorised in obstetric indications has become unfavourable, taking into account the cardiovascular events reported. Hungary considered it was in the interest of the Union to refer the matter to the PRAC and expressed concerns with regards to the posology and warnings reflected in the product information. The short-acting beta-agonists (SABAs) (also known as beta-mimetics), salbutamol, terbutaline, fenoterol, ritodrine, hexoprenaline and isoxsuprine are all nationally authorised and have been on the market within the EU since the 1960s. Authorised obstetric indications for SABAs differ across Member States. The authorised obstetric indications include partus prematurus, tocolysis (for some products use is restricted to particular weeks of gestation but for others no specific gestation period is specified), external cephalic version (ECV), and hyper-uterine contractility.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactions Between Corticosteroids and Β Agonists
    Thorax 2000;55:595–602 595 Occasional reviews Interactions between corticosteroids and â agonists Department of Medicine, Dunedin D R Taylor, R J Hancox School of Medicine, P O Box 913, Dunedin, New Zealand D R Taylor Inhaled corticosteroids and â agonists are the whereas long acting agents are indicated as a R J Hancox most frequently prescribed drugs in the supplement to anti-inflammatory therapy if management of chronic asthma. Current breakthrough symptoms persist.1 Thus, co- Correspondence to: prescribing is commonplace. However, despite Dr D R Taylor guidelines emphasise their complementary e-mail: robin.taylor@ role. Inhaled corticosteroids are the treatment dynamic interactions between endogenous stonebow.otago.ac.nz of choice for all but the mildest of disease. glucocorticoids and catecholamines in vivo, it Received 5 January 2000 Short acting â agonists are recommended for is only recently that interest in the possibility of Accepted for publication “as required” relief of asthma symptoms, drug interactions has developed. Two topical 20 January 2000 and clinically relevant questions arise. Firstly, do positive interactions occur, thus providing s BA theoretical justification for current trends to use combination products incorporating a long Gs BR acting â agonist and a corticosteroid? Sec- AC ondly, do negative interactions occur which might explain the apparent paradox that, HSP GR 1 ATP despite increasing use of the two therapies over the last 30 years, the overall burden of asthma cAMP HSP s 2 morbidity in most western countries has GR CREB continued to increase?2 TF 3 EVects of glucocorticoids on â receptor PKA 10 function s 4 Endogenous adrenal glucocorticoids have an GR CREB important facilitatory eVect on â receptor 6 function in vivo.
    [Show full text]
  • Inhaled Β2-Agonists in Asthma Management: an Evolving Story
    Diana Silva1,2, Tiago Jacinto3,4 [email protected] 1Serviço de Imunoalergologia, Centro Hospitalar São João, EPE, Porto, Portugal. 2Laboratory of Immunology, Basic and Clinical Immunology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal. 3Allergology, CUF Porto Hospital and Instituto, Porto, Portugal. 4CINTESIS – Center for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal. Inhaled β2-agonists in asthma management: an evolving story Cite as: Silva D, Jacinto T. Inhaled β2-agonists in asthma Landmark papers in respiratory medicine management: an evolving story. Breathe 2016; 12: 379–381. From the beginning… was inadequate for control of nocturnal symptoms and limited their use for maintenance treatment [1]. Sympathomimetic agents have been known in For these reasons, long-acting β2-agonists (LABA) Chinese medicine for at least 5000 years as a drug were developed in the 1980s. to treat disorders of respiratory tract; however, they With duration of action that reached 12 h, were introduced to western medicine mainly in the formoterol and salmeterol were considered for beginning of the 20th century [1]. long-term treatment, particularly among patients Adrenaline and isoproterenol were the first who did not achieve control under regular inhaled to be introduced, although, being unselective corticosteroids. The mechanisms for their long β-agonists, they were prone to significant side- duration have been debated, and it seems that effects. Through the years, new formulations and different physicochemical properties in contact routes of administration of these drugs, namely with the cell membrane and with the β2-receptor the inhaled route, were associated with more might explain their characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment Report for Short Acting Beta Agonists (Sabas) Containing Medicinal Products Authorised in Obstetric Indications
    23 October 2013 EMA/664276/2013 Assessment report for Short Acting Beta Agonists (SABAs) containing medicinal products authorised in obstetric indications Procedure under Article 31 of Directive 2001/83/EC INN/active substance: terbutaline, salbutamol, hexoprenaline, ritodrine, fenoterol, isoxsuprine Procedure number: EMEA/H/A-31/1347 Assessment Report as adopted by PRAC with all the information of a confidential nature deleted. 7 Westferry Circus ● Canary Wharf ● London E14 4HB ● United Kingdom Telephone +44 (0)20 7418 8400 Facsimile +44 (0)20 7418 8416 E -mail [email protected] Website www.ema.europa.eu An agency of the European Union © European Medicines Agency, 2013. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Table of contents 1. Background information on the procedure .............................................. 3 2. Scientific discussion ................................................................................ 3 2.1. Clinical aspects .................................................................................................... 4 2.1.1. Safety .............................................................................................................. 4 2.1.2. Efficacy ............................................................................................................ 8 2.2. Risk minimisation activities .................................................................................. 13 2.3. Product information ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]