DOCSLIB.ORG

Dialectics and Liberty

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dialectics and Liberty Dialectics and Liberty BY CHRIS MATTHEW SCIABARRA en years ago the first two books of what has The socialists have also criticized many of the advo- become known as my “Dialectics and Liberty” cates of capitalism for having embraced a dogmatic, ahis- Ttrilogy were published. Those books—Marx, torical social ideal. Marx himself had derided bourgeois Hayek, and Utopia (SUNY Press) and Ayn Rand: The theorists as “Robinsonades”; the bourgeois, said Marx, Russian Radical (Penn State Press)—together with the had put forth an atomistic notion of human liberty that culminating work, Total Freedom:Toward a Dialectical Lib- saw individuals as entirely separate from one another. ertarianism (Penn State Press), constitute a defense of Like “Robinson Crusoe” on a desert island, the bour- dialectical method in the service of a geois individual is unrelated to other libertarian social theory. individuals and unrelated to any social It is odd to find the word “dialec- It is odd to find the or historical context. And, for the tics” conjoined with anything remote- word “dialectics” most part, mainstream neoclassical ly having to do with “libertarianism.” economists agreed with him. Their And this is, perhaps, a result of the conjoined with static conceptions of “perfect” compe- profound socialist influence on con- tition posited a rationalistic model of temporary thought. Say the word anything remotely “Economic Man” in possession of “dialectics” and what might come to having to do with “perfect” knowledge. Such a model mind is the “thesis-antithesis-synthe- had little to do with the dynamics of sis” waltz usually associated with “libertarianism.”And the real world. Hegel (even though that triad more this is, perhaps, a But as F.A. Hayek and others have appropriately belongs to Fichte). Or pointed out, the very word “capital- one might think of the “historical result of the profound ism” was a product of the socialist con- materialism” of the Marxists, who socialist influence on ception of history. It took a major view communism as the ultimate effort by twentieth-century thinkers to “synthesis.” Or one might even think contemporary provide a thorough reconceptualiza- of the claims made by some that tion of the market society and its foun- dialectics is a means of “resolving” thought. dations. Among these were Austrian actual, logical contradictions, a means economists, such as Ludwig von Mises of showing that “A” and “non-A” are one and the same. and Hayek himself, who viewed the market in dynamic It is no coincidence that the same people who dis- and institutional terms, and philosophers, such as Ayn miss dialectics as an assault on logic are often the same Rand, who articulated an objective moral ethos at the people who view it as the methodology of socialism. But base of “capitalism: the unknown ideal.” even some of the proponents of socialism would agree, for they have dismissed logic as a “bourgeois” prejudice, Chris Matthew Sciabarra ([email protected]) is a visiting scholar in while viewing exploitation as the “logic” of capitalism. the department of politics at New York University. THE FREEMAN: Ideas on Liberty 34 Dialectics and Liberty A proper defense of the free society is one that must It is simply mistaken to believe that Marx and Marx- lay to rest the notion that classical liberalism, or libertar- ists have had a monopoly on this type of analysis. It is ianism, as such, depends on static, ahistorical, or atomistic also mistaken to believe that this emphasis on grasping thinking. It is possible, nay, necessary, to present a form of the full context is, somehow, a vestige of Marxism. libertarian social analysis that makes use of the very In fact, the father of dialectics, the man whom Hegel dialectical techniques that are its birthright. It is time to himself called the “fountainhead” of dialectical inquiry, recapture dialectics as a tool for liberty. was Aristotle. In works such as the Topics—the very first That was the goal of my “Dialectics and Liberty” tril- theoretical treatise on dialectics—Aristotle presented ogy. On this tenth anniversary of the publication of its numerous techniques by which one might gain a more first two installments, I look back on the genesis and complete picture of an issue by varying one’s “point of development of this project. view.”TheTopics serves as a grand dis- What is dialectics? Dialectics is the Society is not some cussion of how shifts in one’s per- art of context-keeping. It counsels us to spective can reveal different things study the object of our inquiry from a ineffable organism; it is about the objects of our inquiry, and variety of perspectives and levels of a complex nexus of about the perspectives from which generality,so as to gain a more compre- those objects are viewed. hensive picture of it. That study often interrelated institutions I examine the broad history of requires that we grasp the object in dialectical thinking, from the ancients terms of the larger system within and processes, of to the postmoderns, in part one of which it is situated, as well as its devel- volitionally conscious, Total Freedom. Presenting that history opment across time. Because human is beyond our current scope. But it is beings are not omniscient, because purposeful, interacting important to recognize that these none of us can see the “whole” as if individuals—and the methodological techniques have long from a “synoptic” godlike perspective, been an unheralded aspect of classi- it is only through selective abstraction unintended cal-liberal and libertarian analytical that we are able to piece together a consequences they frameworks, as presented by such more integrated understanding of the thinkers as Herbert Spencer, Carl phenomenon before us—an under- generate. Menger, Mises, Hayek, Rand, and standing of its antecedent conditions, Murray Rothbard. interrelationships, and tendencies. In social theory, the object of our inquiry is society: Hayek’s Critique of Utopianism social relations, institutions, and processes. Society is not or example, Hayek, who absorbs from Menger an some ineffable organism; it is a complex nexus of inter- FAustrian emphasis on process and spontaneous order, related institutions and processes, of volitionally con- enunciated a profoundly dialectical critique of utopi- scious, purposeful, interacting individuals—and the anism. As I argue in Marx, Hayek, and Utopia,Hayek unintended consequences they generate. A dialectical railed against both collectivist and atomist viewpoints. approach to social theory is one that recognizes that any For Hayek, since no human being can know everything given social problem will often entail an investigation of there is to know about society, people cannot simply related social problems. What makes a dialectical redesign it anew.Human beings are as much the creatures approach into a radical approach is that the task of going of their context as they are its creators. Hayek’s rejection to the root of a social problem, seeking to understand it of utopianism is a repudiation of what he calls “con- and resolve it, often requires that we make transparent structivist” rationalism.The utopian relies on a “pretense the relationships among social problems. Understanding of knowledge,” Hayek argued, in an attempt to construct the complexities at work within any given society is a a bridge from the current society to a future one.Where- prerequisite for changing it. as the collectivists have criticized bourgeois theorists for 35 SEPTEMBER 2005 Chris Matthew Sciabarra embracing “ahistorical” and “state of nature” arguments a system, then, of mutual implications, of reciprocal con- for capitalism, they themselves have embraced an ahistor- nections between social psychology,culture, and politics: ical, exaggerated sense of human possibility in their pro- jections of an ideal communist society. Freedom to order our own conduct in the sphere Marx himself was critical of this “constructivism” in where material circumstances force a choice upon us, the works of the utopian socialists, but his own work and responsibility for the arrangement of our own life succumbs to the same constructivist impulse. Implicit in according to our own conscience, is the air in which his communist ideal is the presumption that human alone moral sense grows and in which moral values beings can achieve godlike control over society, as if are daily re-created in the free decisions of the indi- from an Archimedean standpoint, virtually transcending vidual. Responsibility, not to a superior, but to one’s unintended social consequences such that every action conscience,...the necessity to decide which of the brings about a known effect. Hayek saw this as a “syn- things one values . and to bear the consequences of optic delusion,” an illusory belief that one can live in a one’s own decision, are the very essence of any morals world in which every action produces consistent and which deserve the name.That in this sphere of indi- predictable outcomes.And, invariably, the quest for total vidual conduct the effect of collectivism has been knowledge becomes a quest for totalitarian control. almost entirely destructive is both inevitable and Whatever problems one might detect in Hayek’s var- undeniable. A movement whose main promise is the ious theories of social evolution—and I discuss these in relief from responsibility cannot but be antimoral in Marx, Hayek, and Utopia—I believe that he contributes its effect, however lofty the ideals to which it owes its much to a dialectical-libertarian social theory.For exam- birth.2 ple, in his classic book, The Road to Serfdom, Hayek pres- ents us with a multidimensional view of the corrosive Hayek understood that under advancing statism, cul- nature of government control. He does not focus on the ture tends to both promote and reflect those social prac- one-dimensional economic effects of state regulation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Markets Not Capitalism Explores the Gap Between Radically Freed Markets and the Capitalist-Controlled Markets That Prevail Today
    individualist anarchism against bosses, inequality, corporate power, and structural poverty Edited by Gary Chartier & Charles W. Johnson Individualist anarchists believe in mutual exchange, not economic privilege. They believe in freed markets, not capitalism. They defend a distinctive response to the challenges of ending global capitalism and achieving social justice: eliminate the political privileges that prop up capitalists. Massive concentrations of wealth, rigid economic hierarchies, and unsustainable modes of production are not the results of the market form, but of markets deformed and rigged by a network of state-secured controls and privileges to the business class. Markets Not Capitalism explores the gap between radically freed markets and the capitalist-controlled markets that prevail today. It explains how liberating market exchange from state capitalist privilege can abolish structural poverty, help working people take control over the conditions of their labor, and redistribute wealth and social power. Featuring discussions of socialism, capitalism, markets, ownership, labor struggle, grassroots privatization, intellectual property, health care, racism, sexism, and environmental issues, this unique collection brings together classic essays by Cleyre, and such contemporary innovators as Kevin Carson and Roderick Long. It introduces an eye-opening approach to radical social thought, rooted equally in libertarian socialism and market anarchism. “We on the left need a good shake to get us thinking, and these arguments for market anarchism do the job in lively and thoughtful fashion.” – Alexander Cockburn, editor and publisher, Counterpunch “Anarchy is not chaos; nor is it violence. This rich and provocative gathering of essays by anarchists past and present imagines society unburdened by state, markets un-warped by capitalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Libertarian Feminism: Can This Marriage Be Saved? Roderick Long Charles Johnson 27 December 2004
    Libertarian Feminism: Can This Marriage Be Saved? Roderick Long Charles Johnson 27 December 2004 Let's start with what this essay will do, and what it will not. We are both convinced of, and this essay will take more or less for granted, that the political traditions of libertarianism and feminism are both in the main correct, insightful, and of the first importance in any struggle to build a just, free, and compassionate society. We do not intend to try to justify the import of either tradition on the other's terms, nor prove the correctness or insightfulness of the non- aggression principle, the libertarian critique of state coercion, the reality and pervasiveness of male violence and discrimination against women, or the feminist critique of patriarchy. Those are important conversations to have, but we won't have them here; they are better found in the foundational works that have already been written within the feminist and libertarian traditions. The aim here is not to set down doctrine or refute heresy; it's to get clear on how to reconcile commitments to both libertarianism and feminism—although in reconciling them we may remove some of the reasons that people have had for resisting libertarian or feminist conclusions. Libertarianism and feminism, when they have encountered each other, have most often taken each other for polar opposites. Many 20th century libertarians have dismissed or attacked feminism—when they have addressed it at all—as just another wing of Left-wing statism; many feminists have dismissed or attacked libertarianism—when they have addressed it at all—as either Angry White Male reaction or an extreme faction of the ideology of the liberal capitalist state.
    [Show full text]
  • Createspace Word Templates
    MOLINARI REVIEW Molinari Review 1, No. 2 (Fall 2019) © The Molinari Institute 2019 All content in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by: The Molinari Institute 402 Martin Avenue Auburn, Alabama 36830 U.S.A. ISBN: 978-1-947236-00-4 MOLINARI REVIEW The Molinari Review is a peer-reviewed, open-access, print-on-demand, interdiscipli- nary journal of libertarian research. We publish scholarship, sympathetic or critical, in and/or on the libertarian tradition, broadly understood as including classical liberalism, individualist anarchism, social anarchism, anarcho-capitalism, anarcho- communism, anarcho-syndicalism, anarcha-feminism, panarchism, voluntaryism, mu- tualism, agorism, distributism, bleeding-heart libertarianism, Austrianism, Georgism, public choice, and beyond – essentially, everything from Emma Goldman to Ayn Rand, C. L. R. James to F. A. Hayek, Alexis de Tocqueville to Michel Foucault. (We see exciting affiliations among these strands of the libertarian tradition; but you don’t have to agree with us about that to publish in our pages.) Disciplines in which we seek to publish include philosophy, political science, eco- nomics, history, sociology, psychology, anthropology, theology, ecology, literature, and law. We aim to enhance the visibility of libertarian scholarship, to expand the boundaries of traditional libertarian discussion, and to provide a home for cutting- edge research in the theory and practice of human liberty. INFORMATION FOR AUTHORS Submissions should be sent by email to Roderick T. Long at [email protected] as Word .doc or .docx files, prepared for blind review (i.e. all author information re- moved), and accompanied by an abstract of around 150 words as a guide for referees.
    [Show full text]
  • Labor History Revisionism: a Libertarian Analysis of the Pullman Strike
    LABOR HISTORY REVISIONISM: A LIBERTARIAN ANALYSIS OF THE PULLMAN STRIKE Dr Chris Matthew Sciabarra e c n Chris Sciabarra a i l Dr Chris Matthew Sciabarra is the author of the “ Dialectics and Liberty Trilogy” that began l with Marx, Hayek, and Utopia, continued with Ayn Rand: The Russian Radical, and culminates with Total Freedom: Toward a Dialectical Libertarianism. He is also the co-editor with Mimi Reisel Gladstein of Feminist Interpretations of Ayn Rand. His essays have appeared in such books and journals as Encyclopedia of New York State, Encyclopedia of Ethics, American Writers: A Collection of A Literary Biographies, Philosophical Books, Critical Review, Reason Papers, Historian, The Free Radical, Liberty, The Ludwig von Mises Institute On-Line Magazine, Full Context, Film Score Monthly, New York Daily News, Jazz Times, Billboard, and The Daily Objectivist. He is also a founding co-editor of The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies and 2003 named an Assistant Editor for The Free Radical. He n has been a Visiting Scholar in the Department of Politics at New York University since January 1989. Check out Sciabarra on the Web: www.nyu.edu/projects/sciabarra. a i Historical Notes No. 46 ISBN 1 85637 586 2 r ISSN 0267-7105 © 2003: Libertarian Alliance & Chris Sciabarra a For Life, Liberty, and Property t The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and not necessarily those of the r Libertarian Alliance, its Committee, its Advisory Suite 35 Council, or its subscribers. 2 Lansdowne Row e Mayfair London Director: Dr Chris R. Tame W1J 6HL b Deputy Director: Brian Micklethwait i Director of Communications: Dr Sean Gabb Telephone: 0870 242 1712 Public Affairs Director: Dr Tim Evans Email: [email protected] L Editorial & Membership Director: Nigel Meek Website: www.libertarian.co.uk Page 1 LIBERTARIAN ALLIANCE LABOR HISTORY REVISIONISM: A LIBERTARIAN ANALYSIS OF THE PULLMAN STRIKE Chris Matthew Sciabarra Preface (2003) by Chris Matthew Sciabarra program.
    [Show full text]
  • Matt Mackenzie DRAFT 12/06 Exploitation: a Dialectical Anarchist
    Matt MacKenzie DRAFT 12/06 Exploitation: A Dialectical Anarchist Perspective In his 1985 paper, “Should Marxists Be Interested in Exploitation?,” John Roemer1 suggests that contemporary Marxists should be less interested in exploitation than has been the case historically. Taking my cue from Roemer, in this paper I shall ask: should libertarians be interested in exploitation? It seems to me that, as a matter of fact, many contemporary libertarians are either relatively uninterested in or suspicious of the concept of exploitation—though the same is not true of 19th and early 20th century libertarians. Of course, it will readily be admitted that the state exploits its citizens, but this will be understood primarily in terms of the apparently more basic concepts of coercion, oppression, and theft. Thus, it might be said, the claim of exploitation adds nothing substantive to the libertarian critique of the state. In addition, it could be argued, there are reasons to be suspicious of claims of exploitation. For, in broader public discourse, the term too often seems to be a stand-in for mere disapproval. And when the term is given more definite content, it often involves assumptions about politics and economics that are unacceptable from a libertarian point of view. Despite these considerations, I will answer the question in the affirmative—libertarians should be interested in exploitation. Furthermore, I will argue that an appropriately comprehensive libertarianism should recognize, 1) that there are both coercive and non-coercive forms of exploitation, 2) that state capitalist societies are pervasively exploitative, and 3) that exploitation deserves an appropriately, though not exclusively, political response.
    [Show full text]
  • Dialectical Objectivism? a Review of Chris Sciabarra's Ayn Rand: the Russian Radical
    82 Reason Papers Dialectical Objectivism? A Review of Chris Sciabarra's Ayn Rand: The Russian Radical Roger E. Bissell Few works with the level of scholarship evidenced in historian and political theorist Chris Sciabarra's book about Ayn Rand's philosophy have generated such a visceral, polarized response: scathing hostility and scorn on the one extreme and glowing, enthusiastic praise on the other. While an examination of personalities and events surroundingthe preparation and subsequent reception of this book would be a fascinating study in its own right, the present review will focus instead on the thesis that spawned the controversy. Rand's philosophy of Objectivism was born in the aftermath of her final and most famous novel, Atlas Shrugged, though the spiritual core of its ethos apparently dates back to her adolescence in Russia. That Objectivism champions reality, reason, egoism, individualism, laissez-faire capitalism, and romantic art has been common knowledge to its supporters and enemies alike for several decades. What is new in Sciabarra's thesis, what has set everyone on their ears - with either delight or outrage - is his claim that the methodology by which Rand developed her philosophy is the "dialectic." Although Sciabarra doesn't provide a one-sentence, genus-differentia definition of "dialectic," the description he gives (pp. 14-18) portrays dialectics as a methodological orientation with six basic, interrelated characteristics: (1) holism - a commitment to preserve "the analytical integrity of the whole," to see its essential parts as "distinctions within an organic uni ty... inseparable aspect[s] of a wider totality," which cannot be "fully understood in the absence of the other[sIw.
    [Show full text]
  • Rothbard, Murray N. Rotten Boroughs
    Rotten Boroughs 1489 reformist and inclusive liberalism, detailed in Contingency, Irony, while the state is synonymous with coercion, exploitation, and Solidarity (1989). Although no beliefs whatsoever may be class conflict, and war. Whereas markets promote efficiency, assessed objectively (that is, standing outside one’s accultura- rational economic calculation, and production, states are nec- tion), what has resulted are sets of beliefs by means of which, essarily parasitic, inefficient, and destructive. Rothbard envi- and about which, individuals converse, and which they may sions a future libertarian society in which the nonaggression revise. Rorty recommends that the open conversation about principle is enshrined in a Libertarian Law Code, regulating and revision of habits for action be taken seriously, while the activities of voluntarily financed competitive defense and the countless unsuccessful attempts to ground them in puta- judicial agencies. tive foundations or essences be abandoned. Thus the liberal This anarchocapitalist perspective drew from the works of “ironist” engages in an “anti-foundational ist” or “anti-essen- individualist anarchists such as Lysander Spooner, Benjamin tialist” “cultural politics.” Tucker, and Albert Jay Nock. However, the most important influence on Rothbard’s thought was the work of his mentor, See also Decisionism; Empiricism; Essentialism; Freedom; Lan- the Austrian economist Ludwig von Mises. Rothbard’s works guage Policy; Language and Politics; Liberal Theory; Political Phi- in political economy, such as Man, Economy, and State ( ) losophy; Politics; Postmodernism; Pragmatism; Relativism. and Power and Market ( ), extend the principles of Mise- . JOHN DUNCAN sian theory, examining state intervention as the root cause of business cycles, inflation, unemployment, monopolies, war, and BIBLIOGRAPHY imperialism.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberty Magazine November 1995 Mime Type
    Hiroshima: Paeans to Peace -~-w-~-al-~~~-V-~-.~-~-.2~~~-"-m AreNotEnough "The manna ofliberty must be gathered every day. "-'Wendell Phillips o "Voila logic!" -fJ. 0' ROURKE "A "A serious splendid blueprint collection for change." of -GEORGE E WILL informed analyses ... mustreading." "A futuristic -MILTON FRIEDMAN •• VISIon ••• charts ne-w­ territory for "Bristles the decades .with ahead." uncomfortable -Gov. WILLIAM E WELD ideas." -PETE DU PONT "Provocative new "Should be ideas ... a road the principal map for our "Facts, compass new president." reason, for -Go\!. L. DOUGLAS WILDER clear-eyed policymakers and and " Should be read disinterested public servants." andre-read analysis ... -MALCOLM s. FORBES, JR. by every member voila logic!" of Congress." -EJ. O'ROURKE -JACK KEMP THE CATO INSTITUTE'S PRIMER FOR THE '90s! 404 pp.l$25.95 cloth/$15.95 paper Available at bookstores or call toll-free 1·800·767·1241 (noon-9:00 p.m. Eastern time, Monday-Friday) 1000 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20001 • (202) 842-0200 November 1995 Inside Liberty Volume 9, Number 2 4 Letters Liberty's readers have their say. 7 Reflections Liberty's editors remember Jerry, revive the '70s, read the Unabomber, berate Bill Bradley, weep for Waco, and cerebrate Newtonian logic. Features 15 The Randy Weaver Show R. W. Bradford examines the prime-time police state. 23 A Warm Day in Peace Park Michael Oakes visits Hiroshima and learns that paeans to peace are not enough. 30 A Week in Bosnia and Points West Bryan Alexander journeys through the Bosnian interzone. 33 The Money Laundromat J.
    [Show full text]
  • Austro-Libertarian Publishing: a Survey and Critique
    Austro-Libertarian Publishing: A Survey and Critique Walter E. Block Loyola University, New Orleans 1. Introduction Suppose that we take it for granted that we favor a society based on private property rights and voluntary interaction with one another. How can we best attain such a goal? Specifically, how can we best attain an Austro- libertarian understanding of it? We Austro-libertarians all tend in a scholarly, not to say a nerdy, direction. Our comparative advantage thus lies not in picking up a gun and shooting people in order to achieve a free society, but rather in the direction of education.1 This immediately sets up a choice: Shall our efforts in this regard be aimed at public speaking or writing?2 Some might say ―both,‖ but given time limits, that sets up the question: What proportion of time should be devoted to each? At one time I would have come down firmly on the side of publishing rather than giving speeches, on the ground that the former is forever, while the latter is ephemeral. Words go out on the wind, and soon disappear. I reckoned 1 Not that this would do much good in any case. Until the ―hearts and minds‖ of the populace are won, were one dictator to be assassinated, dozens more would contend for his position, and one of them would attain it. Without education, the masses of people, without a proper ideology, would support totalitarianism, not freedom. The pen is truly mightier than the sword since the former determines the direction in which the latter is pointed.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Global Crisis: Reclaiming Rand’S Radical Legacy
    17477 Issue 56 b 17/4/03 9:41 AM Page 16 OBJECTIVISM AND U.S. FOREIGN POLICY CHRIS MATTHEW SCIABARRA Understanding the Global Crisis: Reclaiming Rand’s Radical Legacy “The tree of liberty,” Thomas Jefferson wrote, “must be idea that it is possible to construct a political solution in a culture that does not value refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and procedural democracy, free institutions, or tyrants.” And so, when I saw those startling images of a the notion of individual responsibility is a delusion. Witness contemporary Russia, liberated Iraq—those first photos of fellow New Yorker, Major where the death of communism has given birth to a society of warring post-Soviet David “Bull” Guerfin of the U.S. Marines, ripping down the mafiosi, leading some to yearn for the good poster of Saddam Hussein in Safwan or that riveting footage of ol’ days of Stalin. Clearly, “regime change” is not enough. But even if procedural fellow Brooklynite, Marine Cpl. Edward Chin, helping jubilant democracy were to come to Iraq, it may be Iraqis in Baghdad’s Firdos Square to topple Hussein’s 20-foot no less despotic than the brutal dictatorship it usurps, for majority rule without statue—it seemed to me that Jefferson’s remark was as true as protection of individual rights is no check on the political growth of Islamic ever. fundamentalism. The lunacy of nation-building and of imposed political settlements—which have The blood of that tyrannical regime—and Al Qaeda, my overwhelming concern was— been tried over and over again in the Middle the blood of patriotic American soldiers— and remains—the aftermath of the East with no long-term success—does not had been shed, becoming what Jefferson incursion.
    [Show full text]
  • From the President 2 Global Corruption and the Interventionist State by Richard M
    From the President 2 Global Corruption and the Interventionist State by Richard M. Ebeling Columns 4 Perspective -I, Liberal by Sheldon Richrnan 6 America Needs Socialized Medicine? It Just Ain't So! by Jane Orient 16 Thoughts on Freedom - Drops and Splashes by Donald J. Boudreaux 24 Peripatetics - Moral Alchemy by Sheldon Richrnan 29 Our Economic Past - Thomas Garrett and the Underground Railroad by Burton Folsom, Jr. 47 The Pursuit of Happiness - Honesty and Trust by Walter E. Williams Page 6 Features 8 Government, Fiscal Responsibility, and Free Banking by Richard M. Ebeling 12 Ayn Rand: A Centennial Appreciation by Chris Matthew Sciabarra 18 A Consensus Society by Russell Madden 20 How Government Destroys Medical Care by Steven Greenhut 26 Selling the Free Market to Nonbelievers by Ralph Hood 27 Yo, Brooklyn! Get Real About Politics and Sports by Raymond J. Keating 31 The Vision of William P. Lear by Anthony Young 35 The TobaccO'Quota Buyout: More Legal Plunder by E.G. Pasour, Jr. 39 Capital Letters Page 29 Book Reviews 41 In Defence of the Realm: The Place of Nations in Classical Liberalism by David Conway Reviewed by Richard M. Ebeling 42 Is the Market Moral? A Dialogue on Religion, Economics, and Justice by Rebecca M. Blank and William McGurn Reviewed by James Otteson 43 No Excuses: Closing the Racial Gap in Learning by Abigail Thernstrom and Stephan Thernstrom Reviewed by Karen Y. Palasek 45 Political Class Dismissed: Essays Against Politics by James Ostrowski Reviewed by George C. Leef Page 42 From the President Global Corruption and the Interventionist State BY RICHARD M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Three “Furies” of Libertarianism: Rose Wilder Lane, Isabel Paterson, and Ayn Rand
    The Three “Furies” of Libertarianism: Rose Wilder Lane, Isabel Paterson, and Ayn Rand Jennifer Burns Downloaded from “They make all of us male writers look like Confederate money,” wrote the curmud- geonly cultural critic Albert Jay Nock in 1943. According to Congressman Howard Buf- fett, they “have talent that surpasses that of almost any mere male that I know in the country.” Reflecting on the rise of the Right over the course of the twentieth century, the http://jah.oxfordjournals.org/ journalist John Chamberlain noted, “If it had been left to pusillanimous males probably nothing much would have happened.” To William F. Buckley Jr., they were the “three furies” of libertarianism: the children’s author and magazine writer Rose Wilder Lane, the book critic Isabel Paterson, and the best-selling novelist Ayn Rand. Popular writers who are not typically remembered as significant intellectuals, Lane, Paterson, and Rand nonetheless exerted, according to their contemporaries, a powerful influence on the ideo- 1 logical development of the American Right. at Stanford University on December 14, 2015 But what exactly was this influence, and how should historians make sense of the striking presence of three women, bound by similar life experiences and tenuous bonds of friendship, at the core of modern antistatism? It seems more than coincidence to find three women at this pivotal moment, yet Lane, Paterson, and Rand resist easy analysis on the grounds of gender. They did not claim their womanhood as a source of particu- lar wisdom and did not identify with women as a group. The triumphant self that ran through their fiction could manifest itself in both male and female guise.
    [Show full text]