From the President 2 Global Corruption and the Interventionist State by Richard M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

From the President 2 Global Corruption and the Interventionist State by Richard M From the President 2 Global Corruption and the Interventionist State by Richard M. Ebeling Columns 4 Perspective -I, Liberal by Sheldon Richrnan 6 America Needs Socialized Medicine? It Just Ain't So! by Jane Orient 16 Thoughts on Freedom - Drops and Splashes by Donald J. Boudreaux 24 Peripatetics - Moral Alchemy by Sheldon Richrnan 29 Our Economic Past - Thomas Garrett and the Underground Railroad by Burton Folsom, Jr. 47 The Pursuit of Happiness - Honesty and Trust by Walter E. Williams Page 6 Features 8 Government, Fiscal Responsibility, and Free Banking by Richard M. Ebeling 12 Ayn Rand: A Centennial Appreciation by Chris Matthew Sciabarra 18 A Consensus Society by Russell Madden 20 How Government Destroys Medical Care by Steven Greenhut 26 Selling the Free Market to Nonbelievers by Ralph Hood 27 Yo, Brooklyn! Get Real About Politics and Sports by Raymond J. Keating 31 The Vision of William P. Lear by Anthony Young 35 The TobaccO'Quota Buyout: More Legal Plunder by E.G. Pasour, Jr. 39 Capital Letters Page 29 Book Reviews 41 In Defence of the Realm: The Place of Nations in Classical Liberalism by David Conway Reviewed by Richard M. Ebeling 42 Is the Market Moral? A Dialogue on Religion, Economics, and Justice by Rebecca M. Blank and William McGurn Reviewed by James Otteson 43 No Excuses: Closing the Racial Gap in Learning by Abigail Thernstrom and Stephan Thernstrom Reviewed by Karen Y. Palasek 45 Political Class Dismissed: Essays Against Politics by James Ostrowski Reviewed by George C. Leef Page 42 From the President Global Corruption and the Interventionist State BY RICHARD M. EBELING n a recent survey of 50,000 people in 62 countries respondents in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the around the world, at least one out of every ten peo­ United Kingdom assigned about the same degree of Iple admitted that he had bribed some corrupt significance to political corruption as those in North political official or government administrator during America, between 1 and 2 percent admitted they or the preceding 12 months. There seem to be very few someone in their household had paid a bribe to a places anywhere in the world where such political government official during the preceding year. bribery does not occur. The omnipresence of such TPs more comprehensive 2004 Global Corruption political corruption should not be surprising; it is Report, released last spring, revealed that the primary inseparable from the modern interventionist state. bases for political corruption around the world were According to a report released in December by government procurement contracts, electoral Transparency International (TI), a nongovernmental contributions by special-interest groups, and bribes for organization headquartered in Berlin, one out of every regulatory benefits or limits on both domestic and two people in the West African nation of Cameroon foreign competitors. had paid a bribe during the previous 12 months. In The pervasiveness of political corruption, unfortu­ Albania, Bolivia, Kenya, Lithuania, Moldova, and nately, can be neither reduced nor eliminated through Nigeria, one out of every three citizens said he various forms of legislative and legal reform, as organi­ had done so. In the Czech Republic, Ecuador, zations such as TI often advocate. Corruption is an Ghana, Mexico, the Philippines, Pakistan, Romania, inevitable outgrowth of the interventionist state and Russia, and Ukraine, one out of every four to five peo­ can only be "cured" through the establishment of an ple acknowledged bribing someone connected with unrestricted free-market economy. the government. The essence of the market economy is that each of In 36 of the 62 countries surveyed, respondents said us can acquire what others have only through volun­ that political parties were the most corrupt, followed tary acts of exchange. We must each apply ourselves in by parliaments and legislatures, the police, the legal ways we hope will attract potential customers, per­ system and judiciary, and the tax authorities. Seventy- suading them to purchase what we are selling instead seven percent of all respondents stated that petty of what our rivals are offering. On the free market the political corruption (involving business licenses, traffic only moral and legal "weapon" permitted to "capture" violations, and so on) was a big problem in their coun­ customers is to offer better, more useful, and less- tries. Eighty-five percent said that "grand" political expensive goods to the buying public. Violence and corruption at the highest levels of government involv­ fraud are outside of the market's "rules of the game." ing the political elites and special-interest groups was a Sometimes we will not be able to get what we want. major problem. If we are not as good at satisfying consumers as our While few Americans or Canadians admitted they competitors are, our incomes might be reduced. This paid bribes ("petty" or "grand") to someone in govern­ in turn would reduce our ability to acquire what others ment, in both countries the respondents said that on a are offering on the market. The only way to prevent or scale of one to four (with one being "not at all" and reverse this is to find better ways to supply goods and four being "to a large extent"), the occurrence of political corruption ranked above a three. While Richard Ebeling ([email protected]) is the president of FEE. THE FREEMAN: Ideas on Liberty 2 Global Corruption and the Interventionist State services at attractive prices that will earn us the The business of the interventionist state, therefore, incomes we would like. is the buying and selling of favors and privileges. It The nature of the interventionist state is to short- must lead to corruption, because by necessity it uses circuit the free market and keep it from doing its job, political power to harm some for the benefit of others, namely, seeing to it that each of us applies himself and those expecting to be either harmed or benefited in ways that serve others while pursuing his own will inevitably try to influence what those holding self-interest. The interventionist state goes beyond power do with it. protecting our lives and property, and assuring that all In addition, it should not be forgotten that human association is based on peaceful and mutual such corruption slowly eats away at the moral fiber agreement. It intervenes by using coercive power and of the society. Austrian economist Ludwig von influencing the outcomes of the market through the Mises explained this over 70 years ago in his Critique application of political force. of Interventionism: Transfers of Wealth Public opinion is not mistaken if it scents cor­ he government taxes the public and has huge sums ruption everywhere in the interventionist state. Tof money to disburse to various programs and proj­ By constantly violating criminal laws and moral ects. It imposes licensing and regulatory restrictions on decrees they [the bribers and the bribed] finally lose free and open competition. It transfers great amounts the ability to distinguish between right and wrong, of income and wealth to different groups through good and bad. If finally few economic goods can be sundry "redistributive" schemes. It controls how and produced or sold without violating some regulation, for what purpose people may use and dispose of their it becomes an unfortunate accompaniment of "life" own property. It paternalistically imposes legal stan­ to sin against law and morality. The merchant dards influencing the ways we may live, learn, who began by violating foreign exchange controls, associate, and interact with others around us. import and export restrictions, price ceilings, et Those in the government who wield these powers cetera, easily proceeds to defraud his partner. The hold the fate of virtually everyone in their decision­ decay of business morals ... is the inevitable con­ making hands. It is inevitable that those drawn to comitant of the regulations that were placed on employment in the political arena often will see the trade and production. potential for personal gain in how and for whose ben­ efit or harm they apply their vast life-determining The interventionist state is a political garden that decrees and decisions. Some will be attracted to such inevitably sprouts the weeds of bribery and corruption. "public service" because they are motivated by And over time it tends to envelop and replace all ideological visions they dream of imposing for the traditional and ethical norms of conduct and morality. "good of humanity." Ending global political corruption in its various Some will see that bribing those holding this polit­ "petty" and "grand" forms, therefore, will only come ical power is the only means to attain their ends. This with the removal of government from social and may be to restrict or prohibit competition in their own economic life. When government is limited to pro­ corner of the market or to acquire other people's tecting our lives and property, there will be little left to money through coercive redistribution. For others, buy and sell politically. Corruption then will be an however, bribing those who hold the regulatory infrequent annoyance and occasional scandal, rather reins may be the only way to get around restrictions than an inescapable aspect of today's social and eco­ that prevent them from competing on the market nomic life around the world. ||) and earning a living. 3 JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2005 • ") THE Perspective FREEMAN I, Liberal Published by The Foundation for Economic Education n October a few of us at FEE traveled all the way to Irvington-on-Hudson, NY 10533 Tbilisi, Georgia, one of the former Soviet Union's Phone: (914) 591-7230; E-mail: [email protected] imperial possessions, to put on a two-day student www.fee.org I seminar in the political economy of freedom.
Recommended publications
  • Growing Exports
    Brazil English cover 9/8/03 8:51 PM Page 3 Growing exports The Brazilian tropical timber industry and international markets Duncan Macqueen (Ed.) Maryanne Grieg-Gran Eirivelthon Lima James MacGregor Frank Merry Neil Scotland Roberto Smeraldi Carlos Young July, 2003 Copies of this report are available in Portuguese from: Earthprint Limited, Orders Department, P.O. Box 119, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 4TP e-mail: [email protected] http://www.earthprint.com For enquiries - Tel: +44 1438 748111 Fax: +44 1438 748844 e-mail: [email protected] Correspondence should be addressed to: Duncan Macqueen, Forestry and Land Use Programme, International Institute for Environment and Development, 4 Hanover Street, Edinburgh EH2 2EN Tel: +44 131 226 6860 Fax: +44 131 624 7050 e-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.iied.org Citation: Macqueen, D.J., Grieg-Gran, M., Lima, E., MacGregor, J., Merry, F., Prochnik, V., Scotland, N., Smeraldi, R. and Young, C.E.F. (2003) Growing Exports: The Brazilian tropical timber industry and international markets. IIED Small and Medium Enterprise series No.1. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK. Design: Eileen Higgins Cover photos: Duncan Macqueen Illustration on cover and chapter pages: Print: by Russel Press, Nottingham, UK. Printed on Sovereign Silk 115gsm, 100% chlorine free ISBN 1 84369 437 9 "English is a simple but hard language. It consists entirely of foreign words pronounced wrongly" - Kurt Tucholsky i Author Contact Details: Maryanne Grieg-Gran International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) 3 Endsleigh Street London WC1H 0DD Tel: ++ 44 207 872 7325 Email: [email protected] Eirivelthon Lima Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia (IPAM) Av.
    [Show full text]
  • Markets Not Capitalism Explores the Gap Between Radically Freed Markets and the Capitalist-Controlled Markets That Prevail Today
    individualist anarchism against bosses, inequality, corporate power, and structural poverty Edited by Gary Chartier & Charles W. Johnson Individualist anarchists believe in mutual exchange, not economic privilege. They believe in freed markets, not capitalism. They defend a distinctive response to the challenges of ending global capitalism and achieving social justice: eliminate the political privileges that prop up capitalists. Massive concentrations of wealth, rigid economic hierarchies, and unsustainable modes of production are not the results of the market form, but of markets deformed and rigged by a network of state-secured controls and privileges to the business class. Markets Not Capitalism explores the gap between radically freed markets and the capitalist-controlled markets that prevail today. It explains how liberating market exchange from state capitalist privilege can abolish structural poverty, help working people take control over the conditions of their labor, and redistribute wealth and social power. Featuring discussions of socialism, capitalism, markets, ownership, labor struggle, grassroots privatization, intellectual property, health care, racism, sexism, and environmental issues, this unique collection brings together classic essays by Cleyre, and such contemporary innovators as Kevin Carson and Roderick Long. It introduces an eye-opening approach to radical social thought, rooted equally in libertarian socialism and market anarchism. “We on the left need a good shake to get us thinking, and these arguments for market anarchism do the job in lively and thoughtful fashion.” – Alexander Cockburn, editor and publisher, Counterpunch “Anarchy is not chaos; nor is it violence. This rich and provocative gathering of essays by anarchists past and present imagines society unburdened by state, markets un-warped by capitalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Ludwig Von Mises and the "Ordo-Interventionists": More Than Just Aggression and Contempt?
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Kolev, Stefan Working Paper Ludwig von Mises and the "Ordo-interventionists": More than just aggression and contempt? CHOPE Working Paper, No. 2016-35 Provided in Cooperation with: Center for the History of Political Economy at Duke University Suggested Citation: Kolev, Stefan (2016) : Ludwig von Mises and the "Ordo-interventionists": More than just aggression and contempt?, CHOPE Working Paper, No. 2016-35, Duke University, Center for the History of Political Economy (CHOPE), Durham, NC This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/155463 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Ludwig von Mises and the “Ordo-interventionists” – More Than Just Aggression and Contempt? by Stefan Kolev CHOPE Working Paper No.
    [Show full text]
  • Libertarian Feminism: Can This Marriage Be Saved? Roderick Long Charles Johnson 27 December 2004
    Libertarian Feminism: Can This Marriage Be Saved? Roderick Long Charles Johnson 27 December 2004 Let's start with what this essay will do, and what it will not. We are both convinced of, and this essay will take more or less for granted, that the political traditions of libertarianism and feminism are both in the main correct, insightful, and of the first importance in any struggle to build a just, free, and compassionate society. We do not intend to try to justify the import of either tradition on the other's terms, nor prove the correctness or insightfulness of the non- aggression principle, the libertarian critique of state coercion, the reality and pervasiveness of male violence and discrimination against women, or the feminist critique of patriarchy. Those are important conversations to have, but we won't have them here; they are better found in the foundational works that have already been written within the feminist and libertarian traditions. The aim here is not to set down doctrine or refute heresy; it's to get clear on how to reconcile commitments to both libertarianism and feminism—although in reconciling them we may remove some of the reasons that people have had for resisting libertarian or feminist conclusions. Libertarianism and feminism, when they have encountered each other, have most often taken each other for polar opposites. Many 20th century libertarians have dismissed or attacked feminism—when they have addressed it at all—as just another wing of Left-wing statism; many feminists have dismissed or attacked libertarianism—when they have addressed it at all—as either Angry White Male reaction or an extreme faction of the ideology of the liberal capitalist state.
    [Show full text]
  • A Response to the Libertarian Critics of Open-Borders Libertarianism
    LINCOLN MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW __________________________________ VOLUME 4 FALL 2016 ISSUE 1 ____________________________________ A RESPONSE TO THE LIBERTARIAN CRITICS OF OPEN-BORDERS LIBERTARIANISM Walter E. Block, Ph.D. Harold E. Wirth Eminent Scholar Endowed Chair and Professor of Economics Joseph A. Butt, S.J. College of Business I. INTRODUCTION Libertarians may be unique in many regards, but their views on immigration do not qualify. They are as divided as is the rest of the population on this issue. Some favor open borders, and others oppose such a legal milieu. The present paper may be placed in the former category. It will outline both sides of this debate in sections II and III. Section IV is devoted to some additional arrows in the quiver of the closed border libertarians, and to a refutation of them. We conclude in section V. A RESPONSE TO THE LIBERTARIAN CRITICS OF OPEN-BORDERS LIBERTARIANISM 143 II. ANTI OPEN BORDERS The libertarian opposition to free immigration is straightforward and even elegant.1 It notes, first, a curious bifurcation in international economic relations. In the case of both trade and investment, there must necessarily be two2 parties who agree to the commercial interaction. In the former case, there must be an importer and an exporter; both are necessary. Without the consent of both parties, the transaction cannot take place. A similar situation arises concerning foreign investment. The entrepreneur who wishes to set up shop abroad must obtain the willing acquiescence of the domestic partner for the purchase of land and raw materials. And the same occurs with financial transactions that take place across 1 Peter Brimelow, ALIEN NATION: COMMON SENSE ABOUT AMERICA’S IMMIGRATION DISASTER (1995); Jesús Huerta De Soto, A Libertarian Theory of Free Immigration, 13 J.
    [Show full text]
  • Createspace Word Templates
    MOLINARI REVIEW Molinari Review 1, No. 2 (Fall 2019) © The Molinari Institute 2019 All content in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by: The Molinari Institute 402 Martin Avenue Auburn, Alabama 36830 U.S.A. ISBN: 978-1-947236-00-4 MOLINARI REVIEW The Molinari Review is a peer-reviewed, open-access, print-on-demand, interdiscipli- nary journal of libertarian research. We publish scholarship, sympathetic or critical, in and/or on the libertarian tradition, broadly understood as including classical liberalism, individualist anarchism, social anarchism, anarcho-capitalism, anarcho- communism, anarcho-syndicalism, anarcha-feminism, panarchism, voluntaryism, mu- tualism, agorism, distributism, bleeding-heart libertarianism, Austrianism, Georgism, public choice, and beyond – essentially, everything from Emma Goldman to Ayn Rand, C. L. R. James to F. A. Hayek, Alexis de Tocqueville to Michel Foucault. (We see exciting affiliations among these strands of the libertarian tradition; but you don’t have to agree with us about that to publish in our pages.) Disciplines in which we seek to publish include philosophy, political science, eco- nomics, history, sociology, psychology, anthropology, theology, ecology, literature, and law. We aim to enhance the visibility of libertarian scholarship, to expand the boundaries of traditional libertarian discussion, and to provide a home for cutting- edge research in the theory and practice of human liberty. INFORMATION FOR AUTHORS Submissions should be sent by email to Roderick T. Long at [email protected] as Word .doc or .docx files, prepared for blind review (i.e. all author information re- moved), and accompanied by an abstract of around 150 words as a guide for referees.
    [Show full text]
  • Labor History Revisionism: a Libertarian Analysis of the Pullman Strike
    LABOR HISTORY REVISIONISM: A LIBERTARIAN ANALYSIS OF THE PULLMAN STRIKE Dr Chris Matthew Sciabarra e c n Chris Sciabarra a i l Dr Chris Matthew Sciabarra is the author of the “ Dialectics and Liberty Trilogy” that began l with Marx, Hayek, and Utopia, continued with Ayn Rand: The Russian Radical, and culminates with Total Freedom: Toward a Dialectical Libertarianism. He is also the co-editor with Mimi Reisel Gladstein of Feminist Interpretations of Ayn Rand. His essays have appeared in such books and journals as Encyclopedia of New York State, Encyclopedia of Ethics, American Writers: A Collection of A Literary Biographies, Philosophical Books, Critical Review, Reason Papers, Historian, The Free Radical, Liberty, The Ludwig von Mises Institute On-Line Magazine, Full Context, Film Score Monthly, New York Daily News, Jazz Times, Billboard, and The Daily Objectivist. He is also a founding co-editor of The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies and 2003 named an Assistant Editor for The Free Radical. He n has been a Visiting Scholar in the Department of Politics at New York University since January 1989. Check out Sciabarra on the Web: www.nyu.edu/projects/sciabarra. a i Historical Notes No. 46 ISBN 1 85637 586 2 r ISSN 0267-7105 © 2003: Libertarian Alliance & Chris Sciabarra a For Life, Liberty, and Property t The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and not necessarily those of the r Libertarian Alliance, its Committee, its Advisory Suite 35 Council, or its subscribers. 2 Lansdowne Row e Mayfair London Director: Dr Chris R. Tame W1J 6HL b Deputy Director: Brian Micklethwait i Director of Communications: Dr Sean Gabb Telephone: 0870 242 1712 Public Affairs Director: Dr Tim Evans Email: [email protected] L Editorial & Membership Director: Nigel Meek Website: www.libertarian.co.uk Page 1 LIBERTARIAN ALLIANCE LABOR HISTORY REVISIONISM: A LIBERTARIAN ANALYSIS OF THE PULLMAN STRIKE Chris Matthew Sciabarra Preface (2003) by Chris Matthew Sciabarra program.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Macroeconomic Literacy
    Principles of Macroeconomic Literacy Principles of Macroeconomic Literacy John Scott University of North Georgia Copyright © 2015 John Scott All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in whole or in part without written permission from the publishers, except by reviewers who may quote breif excerpts in connection with a review in newspaper, magazine, or electronic publications; nor may any part of this book be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or other, without written permission from the publisher. Published by: University of North Georgia Press Dahlonega, Georgia Printing Support by: Booklogix Publishing Services, Inc Alpharetta, Georgia Cover design by Corey Parson ISBN: 978-1-940771-18-2 Printed in the United States of America, 2015 For more information, please visit ung.edu/press Or email [email protected] If you need this document in another format, please email the University of North Georgia Press at [email protected] or call 706-864-1556. Contents Chapter 1 Economic Decisions-------------------------------------- 9 Chapter 2 Government Decision Making: Public Choice - - - - - - - - - - 27 Chapter 3 Value Creation Through Production -------------------------- 45 Chapter 4 Value Creation Through Trade------------------------------ 55 Chapter 5 Socialism and Capitalism --------------------------------- 69 Chapter 6 Money and Prices -------------------------------------- 79 Chapter 7 Causes and Effects of Inflation ------------------------------ 91 Chapter 8 Credit Markets ----------------------------------------101 Chapter 9 Output, Income, and Economic Growth - - - - - - - - - - - -115 Chapter 10 Labor Markets-----------------------------------------127 Chapter 11 Macroeconomic Adjustment - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -139 Chapter 12 The Federal Budget -------------------------------------153 Summary of the Entire Text 7 SUMMARY OF THE ENTIRE TEXT People try to make themselves better off by interacting with each other in the economy.
    [Show full text]
  • NEW PERSPECTIVES on POLITICAL ECONOMY a Bilingual Interdisciplinary Journal Vol
    NEW PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICAL ECONOMY A bilingual interdisciplinary journal Vol. 8, No. 1 2012 NEW PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICAL ECONOMY A bilingual interdisciplinary journal / Vol. 8, No. 1, 2012 New Perspectives on Political Economy is a peer-reviewed semi-annual bilingual interdisci- plinary journal, published since 2005 in Prague. The journal aims at contributing to schol- arship at the intersection of political science, political philosophy, political economy and law. The main objective of the journal is to enhance our understanding of private property-, market- and individual liberty-based perspectives in the respected sciences. We also belive that only via exchange among social scientists from different fields and cross-disciplinary research can we critically analyze and fully understand forces that drive policy-making and be able to spell out policy implications and consequences. The journal welcomes submis- sions of unpublished research papers, book reviews, and educational notes. Published by CEVRO Institute Academic Press EDITORIAL ADDRESS: New Perspectives on Political Economy CEVRO Institute, Jungmannova 17, 110 00 Praha 1, Czech Republic Manuscripts should be submitted electronically. All manuscripts and correspondence should be addressed to [email protected]. Full text available via DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals and also via EBSCO Pub- lishing databases. INFORMATION FOR AUTHORS Authors submitting manuscripts should include abstracts of not more than 250 words and JEL classification codes. New Perspectives on Political Economy edits for clarity, brevity, and in accordance with the Chicago Manual of Style. Authors should use footnotes rather than endnotes or in-text references, and must include complete bibliographical information. Authors should include information on their titles and professional affiliations, along with e-mail address.
    [Show full text]
  • Matt Mackenzie DRAFT 12/06 Exploitation: a Dialectical Anarchist
    Matt MacKenzie DRAFT 12/06 Exploitation: A Dialectical Anarchist Perspective In his 1985 paper, “Should Marxists Be Interested in Exploitation?,” John Roemer1 suggests that contemporary Marxists should be less interested in exploitation than has been the case historically. Taking my cue from Roemer, in this paper I shall ask: should libertarians be interested in exploitation? It seems to me that, as a matter of fact, many contemporary libertarians are either relatively uninterested in or suspicious of the concept of exploitation—though the same is not true of 19th and early 20th century libertarians. Of course, it will readily be admitted that the state exploits its citizens, but this will be understood primarily in terms of the apparently more basic concepts of coercion, oppression, and theft. Thus, it might be said, the claim of exploitation adds nothing substantive to the libertarian critique of the state. In addition, it could be argued, there are reasons to be suspicious of claims of exploitation. For, in broader public discourse, the term too often seems to be a stand-in for mere disapproval. And when the term is given more definite content, it often involves assumptions about politics and economics that are unacceptable from a libertarian point of view. Despite these considerations, I will answer the question in the affirmative—libertarians should be interested in exploitation. Furthermore, I will argue that an appropriately comprehensive libertarianism should recognize, 1) that there are both coercive and non-coercive forms of exploitation, 2) that state capitalist societies are pervasively exploitative, and 3) that exploitation deserves an appropriately, though not exclusively, political response.
    [Show full text]
  • Dialectics and Liberty
    Dialectics and Liberty BY CHRIS MATTHEW SCIABARRA en years ago the first two books of what has The socialists have also criticized many of the advo- become known as my “Dialectics and Liberty” cates of capitalism for having embraced a dogmatic, ahis- Ttrilogy were published. Those books—Marx, torical social ideal. Marx himself had derided bourgeois Hayek, and Utopia (SUNY Press) and Ayn Rand: The theorists as “Robinsonades”; the bourgeois, said Marx, Russian Radical (Penn State Press)—together with the had put forth an atomistic notion of human liberty that culminating work, Total Freedom:Toward a Dialectical Lib- saw individuals as entirely separate from one another. ertarianism (Penn State Press), constitute a defense of Like “Robinson Crusoe” on a desert island, the bour- dialectical method in the service of a geois individual is unrelated to other libertarian social theory. individuals and unrelated to any social It is odd to find the word “dialec- It is odd to find the or historical context. And, for the tics” conjoined with anything remote- word “dialectics” most part, mainstream neoclassical ly having to do with “libertarianism.” economists agreed with him. Their And this is, perhaps, a result of the conjoined with static conceptions of “perfect” compe- profound socialist influence on con- tition posited a rationalistic model of temporary thought. Say the word anything remotely “Economic Man” in possession of “dialectics” and what might come to having to do with “perfect” knowledge. Such a model mind is the “thesis-antithesis-synthe- had little to do with the dynamics of sis” waltz usually associated with “libertarianism.”And the real world.
    [Show full text]
  • Dialectical Objectivism? a Review of Chris Sciabarra's Ayn Rand: the Russian Radical
    82 Reason Papers Dialectical Objectivism? A Review of Chris Sciabarra's Ayn Rand: The Russian Radical Roger E. Bissell Few works with the level of scholarship evidenced in historian and political theorist Chris Sciabarra's book about Ayn Rand's philosophy have generated such a visceral, polarized response: scathing hostility and scorn on the one extreme and glowing, enthusiastic praise on the other. While an examination of personalities and events surroundingthe preparation and subsequent reception of this book would be a fascinating study in its own right, the present review will focus instead on the thesis that spawned the controversy. Rand's philosophy of Objectivism was born in the aftermath of her final and most famous novel, Atlas Shrugged, though the spiritual core of its ethos apparently dates back to her adolescence in Russia. That Objectivism champions reality, reason, egoism, individualism, laissez-faire capitalism, and romantic art has been common knowledge to its supporters and enemies alike for several decades. What is new in Sciabarra's thesis, what has set everyone on their ears - with either delight or outrage - is his claim that the methodology by which Rand developed her philosophy is the "dialectic." Although Sciabarra doesn't provide a one-sentence, genus-differentia definition of "dialectic," the description he gives (pp. 14-18) portrays dialectics as a methodological orientation with six basic, interrelated characteristics: (1) holism - a commitment to preserve "the analytical integrity of the whole," to see its essential parts as "distinctions within an organic uni ty... inseparable aspect[s] of a wider totality," which cannot be "fully understood in the absence of the other[sIw.
    [Show full text]