DEP Bulletin, 02/11/98
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Town of Philipstown Conservation Board 238 Main Street, Cold Spring, Ny 10516
TOWN OF PHILIPSTOWN CONSERVATION BOARD 238 MAIN STREET, COLD SPRING, NY 10516 MEETING AGENDA August 12, 2014 at 7:30 pm 1.) OBERT WOOD TM# 71.-2-39.1 WL-14-241 316 OLD WEST POINT RD INSTALL BURRIED ELECTRIC SERVICE TO A NEW RESIDENCE 2.) BRUCE AND DONNA KEHR TM# 16.20-18,20,&21 PBR TOWN OF PHILIPSTOWN 238 Main Street PUTNAM COUNTY, NEWYORK Cold Spring, NY, 10516 (845) 265-5202 APPLICATION FOR WETLANDS PERMIT· Note to Applicant: . Submit the completed application to the appropriate permitting authoirty. The application for Wetlands Permit should be sumbitte simultaneously with any related application (e.g. subdivision approval, site plan approval, special use permit, etc.) being made to the permitting authority. (Office Use Only) Application # D Permitting Authority Received by: D Z.B.A Date D Planning Board Fee D Wetlands Inspector Pursuant to Chapter 93 of the Code of the Town of Philipstown, entitled "Freshwater Wetlands and Watercourse Law of the Town of Philipstown" (Wetlands Law), the undersigned hereby applies for a Wetlands Permit to conduct a regulated activity in a controlled area. 1. Owner; Name: Obert R. Wood. III Address: 115 East 9th Street, Apt 2M New York, NY 10003 E212~ Telephone: 6298334 0117-6'10- 026g 2. Agent Name: (Applicant must be owner of the land The Application may be managed by an authorized agent of such person possessing a notarized letter of consent from the owner.) Name of Agent If Corporation, give names of officers: Mailing Address _ Telephone: 3. Location of Proposed Activity: 316 Old West Point Road West, Garrison Tax Map No.: 7_1_.-_2_-3_9_._1 _ Acreage of Controlled Area Affected: -------------------0.047 4. -
Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan February 2009 This Blue Goose, Designed by J.N
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan February 2009 This blue goose, designed by J.N. “Ding” Darling, has become the symbol of the National Wildlife Refuge System. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is the principal federal agency responsible for conserving, protecting, and enhancing fi sh, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for the continuing benefi t of the American people. The Service manages the 97-million acre National Wildlife Refuge System comprised of more than 548 national wildlife refuges and thousands of waterfowl production areas. It also operates 69 national fi sh hatcheries and 81 ecological services fi eld stations. The agency enforces federal wildlife laws, manages migratory bird populations, restores nationally signifi cant fi sheries, conserves and restores wildlife habitat such as wetlands, administers the Endangered Species Act, and helps foreign governments with their conservation efforts. It also oversees the Federal Assistance Program which distributes hundreds of millions of dollars in excise taxes on fi shing and hunting equipment to state wildlife agencies. Comprehensive Conservation Plans provide long term guidance for management decisions and set forth goals, objectives, and strategies needed to accomplish refuge purposes and identify the Service’s best estimate of future needs. These plans detail program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes. The plans do not constitute a commitment for staffi ng increases, operational and maintenance increases, or funding for future land acquisition. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan February 2009 Submitted by: Edward Henry Date Refuge Manager Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge Concurrence by: Janet M. -
Phase 1 Study
DELAWARE RIVER JOINT TOLL BRIDGE COMMISSION SOUTHERLY CROSSINGS CORRIDOR STUDY PHASE I TRANSPORTATION STUDY Prepared for: DELAWARE RIVER JOINT TOLL BRIDGE COMMISSION Prepared by: THE LOUIS BERGER GROUP, INC. EAST ORANGE, NEW JERSEY June 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS Southerly Crossings Corridor Study TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................Executive Summary Page 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND STUDY METHODOLOGY.............................................1-1 1.1 Background.........................................................................................1-1 1.2 Objectives of the Southerly Crossings Corridor Study .....................................1-3 1.3 Traffic Forecasting & Analysis Methodology................................................1-3 1.3.1 Overview.............................................................................................................1-3 1.3.2 Travel Demand Forecasting ................................................................................1-4 1.4 Alternatives Development and Screening .....................................................1-7 1.5 Alternatives Analysis-Measures of Effectiveness .......................................... 1-10 1.5.1 Level of Service...............................................................................................1-10 1.5.2 Construction Cost Estimates............................................................................1-11 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ..............................................................................2-1 -
Cape May County Transportation Study
Cape May County Transportation Study Prepared by: Cape May County Planning Department 4 Moore Road Cape may Court House, New Jersey 08210 www.capemaycountygov.net 2006 Cover: Rendering of Proposed Middle Thorofare Bridge Replacement, Ocean Drive (Co. Rd. 621) Lower Township. Cape May County Transportation Plan 2006 CAPE MAY COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Resolution Number 03-06 ADOPTING THE CAPE MAY COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN Whereas, the County of Cape May seeks to provide state-of-the-art transportation facilities for the convenience and safety of its residents and visitors; and Whereas, it is necessary to provide a Transportation Plan to meet the current and future transportation needs of the County and to satisfy Federal and State planning requirements; and Whereas, Cape May County has prepared said plan addressing these issues and wishes to adopt this plan as the Transportation Element of the Cape May County Comprehensive Plan; and Whereas, prior to the adoption of any component or amendment of a County Comprehensive Plan a public hearing must be held in accordance with NJSA 40:27-4; and Whereas, on September 19, 2006 the Cape May County Planning Board held such a public hearing and listened to and addressed the concerns of the public regarding the plan. Now Therefore Be It Resolved by the Cape May County Planning Board that the Cape May County Transportation Plan is hereby adopted as the Transportation Element of the Cape May County Comprehensive Plan; and Now Therefore Be It Further Resolved, that in accordance with the provisions of NJSA 40:27-4, attested copies of this plan shall be certified to the Cape May County Board of Chosen Freeholders, the Cape May County Park Commission, and the Municipal Clerks of all municipalities in the County. -
Analysis and Modeling of Cape May County Roadway Elevations and Evacuation Routes NJDOT Research Report No: FHWA-NJ-2005-022
“TURNING PROBLEMS INTO SOLUTIONS” ANALYSIS AND MODELING OF CAPE MAY Need a solution? COUNTY ROADWAY ELEVATIONS AND Think Jersey DOT EVACUATION ROUTES FHWA-NJ-2005-022 May 2006 SUMMARY This study determined the evacuation times under varying population, hurricane level, and NJ Routes 47/347 reversal lane operation scenarios for Cape May County, New Jersey. Roadway elevations throughout NJ Routes 47/347 corridor study area were established via a GPS survey to verify whether the roadways are usable in the event of a hurricane. Results of the study show that the current NJ State Police reversal plan is ineffective and needs to be revised as the bottleneck during evacuation would exist south of NJ Route 83, the initiation point of the current reversal plan. INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND Disaster response, to both manmade and natural catastrophes, in the areas of high population density, is centered on evacuating people quickly and efficiently. Being the most densely populated state in the country, New Jersey faces considerable challenges in effectively coordinating and responding to emergencies. In this project, a microscopic traffic simulation based model was developed to evaluate the effectiveness of the existing State Police “Routes 47/347 Reverse Lane Plan” for Cape May County. This contraflow strategy, also known as lane reversal, was modeled to maximize roadway capacity for the existing network on Routes 47/347. This study determined the evacuation time estimates for various scenarios considering different levels of traffic operations, seasonal area population, hurricane intensity, and behavior response. The behavioral response curves, also called the S-curve models, were applied in this study to approximate behavior responses and to temporally load demand onto the network. -
Appendix-J-JCMUA-SIAR-092520.Pdf
Passaic Valley Sewerage Commission October 2020 PVSC Treatment District Regional Long Term Control Plan Appendix J Selection and Implementation of Alternatives Report for Jersey City MUA Jersey City Municipal Utilities Authority Selection and Implementation of Alternatives Report NJPDES Permit No. NJ0108723 March 2020 Jersey City Municipal Utilities Authority January 2020 Selection and Implementation of Alternatives Report Page 1 of 45 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION A - INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 4 SECTION B - SCREENING OF CSO CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES ........................................ 9 SECTION C - EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES................................................................ 10 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 10 DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF ALTERNAtIVES.................................. 11 SECTION D - SELECTION OF RECOMMENDED LTCP ....................................................... 12 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 12 LTCP SELECTION PROCESS ..................................................................................... 12 SELECTION OF ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................. 12 D.3.1 Description ............................................................................................................... 13 D.3.2 -
Central Gloucester County Traffic Study
CENTRAL GLOUCESTER COUNTY TRAFFIC STUDY I!J! DELAWARE VALLEY ~ REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION CENTRAL GLOUCESTER COUNTY TRAFFIC STUDY 1993 (REVISED) DELAWARE VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION - THIS REPORT IS PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER- This report, prepared by the Transportation Planning Division of the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission, was financed by the Federal Highway Administration of the U. S. Department of Transportation and the New Jersey Department of Transportation. The authors, however, are solely responsible for its findings and conclusions, which may not represent the official views or policies of the funding agency. Created in 1965, the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) is an interstate, intercounty and intercity agency which provides continuing, comprehensive and coordinated planning for the orderly growth and development of the Delaware Valley region. The region includes Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and Montgomery counties as well as the City of Philadelphia in Pennsylvania and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester, and Mercer counties in New Jersey. The Commission is an advisory agency which divides its planning and service functions among the Office of the Executive Director, the Office of Public Affairs, and three line Divisions: Transportation Planning, Regional Information Services Center which includes the Office ofRegional Planning, and Finance and Administration. D VRPC 's mission for the 1990s is to emphasize technical assistance and services and to conduct high priority studies for member state and local governments, while determining and meeting the needs of the private sector. The DVRPC logo is adaptedfrom the official seal of the Commission and is designed as a stylized image of the Delaware Valley. The outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole while the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware River flowing through it. -
Stream Management Program Two-Year Action Plans for Ashokan, Schoharie, Ne- Versink/Rondout and Delaware Programs
New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Stream Management Program Two-Year Action Plans for Ashokan, Schoharie, Ne- versink/Rondout and Delaware Programs May 2021 Prepared in accordance with Section 4.6 of the NYSDOH 2017 Filtration Avoidance Determination Prepared by: DEP, Bureau of Water Supply Action Plan 2021-2023 PO Box 667, 3130 Route 28 Shokan, NY 12481 (845) 688-3047 www.ashokanstreams.org To: Dave Burns, Project Manager, NYC DEP Stream Management Program From: Leslie Zucker, CCE Ulster County, and Adam Doan, Ulster County SWCD Date: May 1, 2021 Re: Ashokan Watershed Stream Management Program 2021-2023 Action Plan Cornell Cooperative Extension of Ulster County (CCE) and Ulster County Soil & Water Conservation District (SWCD) with support from the NYC Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) have developed the 2021-2023 Action Plan for your review. The purpose of the Action Plan is to identify the Ashokan Watershed Stream Management Program’s planned activities, accomplishments, and next steps to achieve recommendations derived from stream management plans and stakeholder input. Program activities were reviewed by our Stakeholder Council at November 2019 and April 2020 meetings and their comments are reflected in this 2021-2023 work plan. The Action Plan is divided into key programmatic areas: A. Protecting and Enhancing Stream Stability and Water Quality B. Floodplain Management and Planning C. Highway Infrastructure Management in Conjunction with Streams D. Assisting Streamside Landowners (public and private) E. Protecting and Enhancing Aquatic and Riparian Habitat and Ecosystems F. Enhancing Public Access to Streams The Action Plan is updated annually. This proposed plan will run from June 1, 2021 until May 31, 2023, at which time the recommendations will be revised based on new stream assessments and program needs. -
List of Category I Waters, NJDEP, 2004
(c) The surface water classifications in Table 1 are for waters of the Atlantic Coastal Basin: TABLE 1 Waterbody Classification ABRAMS CREEK (Marmora) - Entire length, within the boundaries of the MacNamara Wildlife Management Area FW2-NT/SE1(C1) ABSECON BAY (Absecon) - All waters within Absecon Wildlife Management Area SE1(C1) ARNOLD POND (Barnegat) FW2-NT/SE1(C1) ATLANTIC OCEAN (Beach Haven) - Waters of the Atlantic Ocean out to the State's three mile limit from Beach Haven Inlet to Cape May Point, excluding: SC(C1) 1. (Atlantic City) - All of the Ocean waters inshore of a line that begins at the center of Convention Hall, Atlantic City bearing approximately 153 degrees T (True North) and extends 2.0 nautical miles to a point with coordinates of latitude 39 degrees 19.4 minutes N., longitude 74 degrees 25.1 minutes W., from this point, approximately 2 nautical miles offshore, the line runs parallel to the shoreline in a southwesterly direction for approximately 2.1 nautical miles to a point with coordinates of latitude 39 degrees 18.4 minutes N., longitude 74 degrees 27.5 minutes W., then bearing approximately 333 degrees T (reciprocal 153 degrees T) for approximately 1.9 nautical miles to the outermost tip of the Ventnor City Fishing Pier located at the Boardwalk and South Cambridge Ave., City of Ventnor, then along that pier to the shore and terminating. 2. (Ocean City) - All of the ocean waters inshore of a line which begins at the City of Ocean City's Beach Patrol, First Aid and Rest Room building located on the beach at 34th Street, -
Natural Resources Management Plan for the Fishkill Creek Watershed
Natural Resources Management Plan For The Fishkill Creek Watershed Fishkill Creek in Tymor Park, Union Vale Fishkill Creek near Carpenter Road in East Fishkill Fishkill Creek in Beacon, NY A Project of the Fishkill Creek Watershed Committee, May, 2005 FishkillCreekWatershed.org Natural Resources Management Plan for the Fishkill Creek Watershed Natural Resource Management Plan for the Fishkill Creek Watershed June 2005 Prepared by the: Primary support provided by: Dutchess County New York State Department of Environmental Environmental Management Council Conservation, and Hudson River Estuary Program Fishkill Creek Watershed Committee Primary Authors/Editors: David Burns, Watershed Coordinator, Dutchess County Environmental Management Council Lisa Vasilakos, Watershed Technician, Dutchess Co. Environmental Management Council Rick Oestrike, Chair, Fishkill Creek Watershed Committee Project Staff: David Foord, Executive Director, Dutchess Co. Environmental Management Council Salvatore LiCausi, GIS Coordinator, Dutchess Co. Environmental Management Council Vicky Buono, Administrative Assistant, Dutchess Co. Environmental Management Council Becky Newman, AmeriCorps, Dutchess Co. Environmental Management Council i Natural Resources Management Plan for the Fishkill Creek Watershed Acknowledgements The Natural Resources Management Plan for the Fishkill Watershed was accomplished as a collaborative effort between several agencies, municipalities, non-governmental organizations, and most importantly, the citizens of the watershed. Upon completion of the Natural Resources Management Plan for the Wappinger Creek Watershed in October of 2000, municipal officials in the Fishkill Creek watershed began expressing interest in a watershed planning effort focused in Southern Dutchess County. Utilizing financial support from the Hudson River Estuary Program, the Dutchess County Environmental Management Council (EMC) and Dutchess County Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) hosted a Fishkill Watershed Symposium in May of 2002. -
New Jersey Legislative Last Date of Action
NEW JERSEY LEGISLATIVE LAST DATE OF ACTION for February 27, 2014 Office of Legislative Services -- Office of Public Information Legislative Information and Bill Room ? State House Annex, Room B-01, P.O. Box 068, Trenton, NJ 08625-0068 (609) 847-3905 / Toll-free in NJ (800) 792-8630 ? Hearing Impaired: Dial 711 for NJ Relay Web Site: http://www.njleg.state.nj.us 216th Legislature -- First Annual Session Bill Number Sponsors Current Status A126 Aca (1R) McHose, Alison Littell /Space, Parker /Tucker, Cleopatra G. +14 2RS Provides for voluntary contributions by taxpayers on gross income tax returns for development of Northern New Jersey Veterans Memorial Cemetery. History: 01/16/2014 INT 1RA REF AMV 02/10/2014 REP/ACA 2RA 02/27/2014 PA (73-0-0) 02/27/2014 R/S SWR 2RS Identical Bill Number: S361 A214 Aca (1R) Gusciora, Reed /Spencer, L. Grace /Chivukula, Upendra J. +2 SLP Clarifies authority of municipal court to suspend driver's licenses; establishes that the terms revoke and suspend are to have the same meaning under Title 39 of the Revised Statutes.* History: 01/16/2014 INT 1RA REF ALP 02/06/2014 REP/ACA 2RA 02/27/2014 PA (74-0-0) 02/27/2014 R/S REF SLP Identical Bill Number: S1774 A347 Aca (1R) Caputo, Ralph R. /Prieto, Vincent /Tucker, Cleopatra G. +9 SCU Authorizes municipalities to impose penalties on creditors that fail to timely remedy code violations of certain properties in foreclosure.* History: 01/16/2014 INT 1RA REF AHO 02/06/2014 REP/ACA 2RA 02/27/2014 PA (72-2-0) 02/27/2014 R/S REF SCU A456 Aca (1R) Green, Jerry /Burzichelli, John J. -
North Shore of Staten Island Habitat Restoration and Green Infrastructure Plan Acknowledgements Executive Summary
North Shore of Staten Island Habitat Restoration and Green Infrastructure Plan Acknowledgements Executive Summary This habitat restoration and green infrastructure plan for Staten Island’s North NYC Parks’ Division of Forestry, Horticulture, and Natural Resources Shore was made possible with funding from the Hudson River Estuary (FHNR), with community support and input, developed a planning framework Program (HRE) of the New York State Department of Environmental for habitat restoration and green infrastructure in parkland on Staten Island’s Conservation. North Shore. NYC Parks thanks its partners and community members that provided The planning process entailed reviewing existing plans, characterizing the feedback throughout the planning process. existing conditions of the North Shore study area, identifying opportunities for habitat restoration and green infrastructure on parkland, and working with the community and partner organizations to refine and evaluate opportunities and priorities. The Plan was prepared between 2016 - 2018 by the Additional resources were devoted to Harbor Brook, which is one of the last NYC Parks Division of Forestry, Horticulture, and Natural Resources remaining intact stream systems on the North Shore. Harbor Brook originates in Goodhue Park, flows through Allison Pond Park, and through the grounds Contributors: of Snug Harbor before it becomes tidal and empties into the Kill Van Kull. Assistant Commissioner: Jennifer Greenfeld Conceptual designs for a small tidal wetland restoration at the banks of the Chief, Natural Resources: Marit Larson furthest downstream reach of Harbor Brook were prepared and presented in Senior Manager: Rebecca Swadek Chapter 5. Project Manager: Ross Diamond Landscape Architect: Kjirsten Alexander In total, we identified 34 opportunities for habitat restoration and 12 for green infrastructure.