Final Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final Report Completed acquisition by PayPal Holdings, Inc. of iZettle AB Final report 12 June 2019 Crown copyright 2019 You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government- licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Website: www.gov.uk/cma Members of the Competition and Markets Authority who conducted this inquiry Kirstin Baker (Chair of the Group) Susan Hankey Jeremy Newman David Thomas Chief Executive of the Competition and Markets Authority Andrea Coscelli The Competition and Markets Authority has excluded from this published version of the report information which the Inquiry Group considers should be excluded having regard to the three considerations set out in section 244 of the Enterprise Act 2002 (specified information: considerations relevant to disclosure). The omissions are indicated by []. Some numbers have been replaced by a range. These are shown in square brackets. Non-sensitive wording is also indicated in square brackets. Contents Page Summary .................................................................................................................... 4 Offline payments for smaller merchants ................................................................ 9 Omni-channel ..................................................................................................... 13 Conclusion .......................................................................................................... 15 Findings .................................................................................................................... 16 1. The reference ..................................................................................................... 16 2. Industry background ........................................................................................... 16 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 16 UK payment markets background ....................................................................... 17 The four party model ........................................................................................... 21 Payment facilitators and independent sales organisations ................................. 24 mPOS and POS .................................................................................................. 26 The Parties’ mPOS offering ........................................................................... 27 History of mPOS in the UK ............................................................................ 28 Omni-channel ..................................................................................................... 29 The Parties’ omni-channel offering ................................................................ 30 3. The Parties ......................................................................................................... 30 PayPal ................................................................................................................ 30 Activities ........................................................................................................ 31 PayPal in the UK ........................................................................................... 31 Financial Performance ................................................................................... 32 iZettle AB ............................................................................................................ 33 Activities ........................................................................................................ 33 Financial Performance ................................................................................... 33 iZettle UK and its relationship with other group companies ........................... 35 4. The Merger and relevant merger situation .......................................................... 36 The Merger ......................................................................................................... 36 The rationale for the Merger ............................................................................... 36 PayPal ........................................................................................................... 36 iZettle ............................................................................................................. 37 Initial Public Offering ...................................................................................... 38 Valuation of iZettle ......................................................................................... 38 The relevant merger situation ............................................................................. 39 Enterprises ceasing to be distinct .................................................................. 39 Turnover and share of supply tests ............................................................... 40 5. Our approach for assessing the effects of the Merger ........................................ 40 6. Market definition.................................................................................................. 43 Offline payment services ..................................................................................... 44 Segmentation by customer size ..................................................................... 45 Segmentation by type of device or provider .................................................. 48 Alternative methods of payment .................................................................... 51 Geographic market definition ......................................................................... 53 Conclusion on relevant market for offline payment services .......................... 53 Omni-channel services ....................................................................................... 53 Parties’ views ................................................................................................. 54 CMA assessment .......................................................................................... 55 Conclusions on product market definition ...................................................... 58 Geographic market definition ......................................................................... 59 1 Conclusion on relevant market for omni-channel services ............................ 59 7. Counterfactual..................................................................................................... 60 PayPal counterfactual ......................................................................................... 60 The Parties’ submissions ............................................................................... 60 PayPal Here absent the Merger .................................................................... 62 CMA assessment .......................................................................................... 64 iZettle counterfactual ........................................................................................... 66 Views of the Parties ....................................................................................... 67 CMA assessment .......................................................................................... 67 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 70 8. Competitive effects of the merger – offline payments ......................................... 70 Customer behaviour ............................................................................................ 71 Customer characteristics ............................................................................... 71 Customers targeted by competitors ............................................................... 73 Choice attributes ............................................................................................ 73 Views on mPOS customer behaviour ............................................................ 75 Shares of supply ................................................................................................. 76 Shares by transaction volume ....................................................................... 76 New customer acquisition .............................................................................. 78 Views on shares of supply ............................................................................. 80 Competition between mPOS providers ............................................................... 81 The Parties’ submissions ............................................................................... 81 Closeness of competition .............................................................................. 82 The Parties’ competitive positions relative to other mPOS providers ............ 90 Competitive constraint by Square .................................................................. 92 Competition with traditional POS providers ................................................... 98 Alternative payment technologies ................................................................ 110 Assessment of impact of the Merger ........................................................... 112 9. Assessment of the competitive effects of the Merger –
Recommended publications
  • February 2019
    The definitive source of news and analysis of the global fintech sector | February 2019 www.bankingtech.com SUPERSTRUCTURES Fintech reaches new heights CASE STUDY: CITIZENS BANK US heavyweight pivots for digital era FOOD FOR THOUGHT: CAREER CHOICES The Venn diagram of doom FINTECH FUTURES IN THIS ISSUE THEM US Contents NEWS 04 The latest fintech news from around the globe: the good, the bad and the ugly. 18 Banking Technology Awards The glamour, the winners and the celebrations. 23 Focus: intraday liquidity Are banks ready to meet the ECB’s latest expectations? 24 Interview: Pavel Novak, Zonky P2P lender on a “mission possible”. 26 Focus: data How DNB uses data to reconnect with customers. 30 Analysis: openfunds Admirable data standardisation efforts for the funds industry. 32 Case study: Citizens Bank US’s 13th largest bank embraces digital era. 38 Food for thought Making career choices and the Venn diagram of doom. They struggle with Fintech complexity. We see straight to your goal. We leverage proprietary knowledge and technology to solve complex regulatory challenges, create new products 40 Comment What would a recession mean for fintech? and build businesses. Our unique “one fi rm” approach brings to bear best-in-class talent from our 32 offi ces worldwide—creating teams that blend global reach and local knowledge. Looking for a fi rm that can help keep 42 Interview: Javier Santamaría, EPC your business moving in the right direction? Visit BCLPlaw.com to learn more. Happy one year anniversary, SEPA Instant Credit Transfer! REGULARS 44
    [Show full text]
  • VISA Europe AIS Certified Service Providers
    Visa Europe Account Information Security (AIS) List of PCI DSS validated service providers Effective 08 September 2010 __________________________________________________ The companies listed below successfully completed an assessment based on the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS). 1 The validation date is when the service provider was last validated. PCI DSS assessments are valid for one year, with the next annual report due one year from the validation date. Reports that are 1 to 60 days late are noted in orange, and reports that are 61 to 90 days late are noted in red. Entities with reports over 90 days past due are removed from the list. It is the member’s responsibility to use compliant service providers and to follow up with service providers if there are any questions about their validation status. 2 Service provider Services covered by Validation date Assessor Website review 1&1 Internet AG Internet payment 31 May 2010 SRC Security www.ipayment.de processing Research & Consulting Payment gateway GmbH Payment processing a1m GmbH Payment gateway 31 October 2009 USD.de AG www.a1m.biz Internet payment processing Payment processing A6IT Limited Payment gateway 30 April 2010 Kyte Consultants Ltd www.A6IT.com Abtran Payment processing 31 July 2010 Rits Information www.abtran.com Security Accelya UK Clearing and Settlement 31 December 2009 Trustwave www.accelya.com ADB-UTVECKLING AB Payment gateway 30 November 2009 Europoint Networking WWW.ADBUTVECKLING.SE AB Adeptra Fraud Prevention 30 November 2009 Protiviti Inc. www.adeptra.com Debt Collection Card Activation Adflex Payment Processing 31 March 2010 Evolution LTD www.adflex.co.uk Payment Gateway/Switch Clearing & settlement 1 A PCI DSS assessment only represents a ‘snapshot’ of the security in place at the time of the review, and does not guarantee that those security controls remain in place after the review is complete.
    [Show full text]
  • MOBILE Payments Market Guide 2013
    MOBILE PAYMENTS MARKET GUIDE 2013 INSIGHTS IN THE WORLDWIDE MOBILE TRANSACTION SERVICES ECOSYSTEM OVER 350 COMPANIES WORLDWIDE INSIDE Extensive global distribution via worldwide industry events As the mobile payments ecosystem is becoming increasingly more crowded and competitive, the roles of established and new players in the mobile market is shifting, with new opportunities and challenges facing each category of service providers. Efma, the global organization that brings together more than 3,300 retail financial services companies from over 130 countries, welcomes the publication of the Mobile Payments Market Guide 2013 by The Paypers as a valuable source of information and guidance for all actors in the mobile transaction services space. Patrick Desmarès - CEO, Efma MOBILE PAYMENTS MARKET GUIDE 2013 INSIGHTS IN THE WORLDWIDE MOBILE TRANSACTION SERVICES ECOSYSTEM Authors Ionela Barbuta Sabina Dobrean Monica Gaza Mihaela Mihaila Adriana Screpnic RELEASE | VERSION 1.0 | APRIL 2013 | COPYRIGHT © THE Paypers BV | ALL RIGHTS reserved 2 MOBILE PAYMENTS MARKET GUIDE 2013 INTRODUCTION Introduction You are reading the Mobile Payments Market Guide 2013, a state- se and the way commerce is done. From a quick and accessible of-the-art overview of the global mobile transaction services channel for banking on the move to a sophisticated tool for shop- ecosystem and the most complete and up-to-date reference ping, price comparison and buying, the saga of the mobile device source for mobile payments, mobile commerce and mobile is an on-going story that unfolds in leaps and bounds within a banking-related information at global level. This guide is published progressively crowded (and potentially fragmented) ecosystem.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Provider Name Region AOC Date Assessor DESV
    A company’s name appears on this Compliant Service Provider List if (i) Mastercard has received a copy of an Attestation of Compliance (AOC) by a Qualified Security Assessor (QSA) reflecting validation of the company being PCI DSS compliant and (ii) Mastercard records reflect the company is registered as a Service Provider by one or more Mastercard Customers. The date of the AOC and the name of the QSA are also provided. Each AOC is valid for one year. Mastercard receives copies of AOCs from various sources. This Compliant Service Provider List is provided solely for the convenience of Mastercard Customers and any Customer that relies upon or otherwise uses this Compliant Service Provider list does so at the Customer’s sole risk. While Mastercard endeavors to keep the list current as of the date set forth in the footer, Mastercard disclaims any and all warranties of any kind, including any warranty of accuracy or completeness or fitness for any particular purpose. Mastercard disclaims any and all liability of any nature relating to or arising in connection with the use of or reliance on the Compliant Service Provider List or any part thereof. Each Mastercard Customer is obligated to comply with Mastercard Rules and other Standards pertaining to use of a Service Provider. As a reminder, an AOC by a QSA provides a “snapshot” of security controls in place at a point in time. Compliant Service Provider 1-60 Days Past AOC Due Date 61-90 Days Past AOC Due Date Service Provider Name Region AOC Date Assessor DESV “BPC Processing”, LLC Europe 03/31/2017 Informzaschita 1&1 Internet SE (1&1, 1&1 ipayment, Europe 05/08/2017 Security Research & Consulting GmbH ipayment.de) 1Shoppingcart.com (Web.com Group, lnc.) US 04/29/2017 SecurityMetrics 2138617 Ontario Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Sumup Says Hi!
    SumUp says Hi! Tobias Janiesch VP Product How I navigated into SumUp Moved to Berlin, didn’t know anyone here. Start at SumUp as VP Master of Economics Product Management Took a plane and flew to Loved being in start-ups and Australia work on products 2001 2007 2010 2011 2014 2020 2 About us Global payments company We are the leading mobile point-of-sale (mPOS) company in Europe and Latin America. We started out in 2011 and built our payment service from scratch to shake up the industry and wake up the entrepreneur within anyone. We created a unique device that with the smartphone that’s in your pocket, allows small merchants to accept card payments anywhere. “ Accept all Transparent & Sign Up in debit & credit simple fee 5 minutes cards structure With SumUp’s UK merchants pay 100% online. proprietary card 1.69% flat per No fixed contract. readers, merchants transaction.* No paperwork. can accept cashless payments. SumUp – A better way to get paid. * Example pricing 3 SumUp in numbers Founded 2011 and constantly growing: • Over 2,900 employees globally, 700 in Berlin • Serving merchants across 34 countries • 1,600,000 live merchants using SumUp monthly • Adding thousands of new businesses every day • More than 200m EUR of revenues in 2020 • 750m EUR debt facility secured in the last financing round from leading financial institutions • backed by the most prestigious equity investors Live markets (Klaus Hommels) SumUp – A better way to get paid. 4 17 offices around the world Berlin, DE Customer Support, Tech, Management, Business Boulder, US Development, Operations, CEO, Marketing, Marketing, Design, New Operations, Businesses Support Sofia, BG Tech, Operations Further offices in: São Paulo, BR Amsterdam, Barcelona, Bogotá, Cologne, Tech, Management, Copenhagen, Dublin, Kiev, London, Luxembourg, Business Development, Milan, Paris, Santiago, and Warsaw Customer Support Our vision A world where small businesses can be successful doing what they love.
    [Show full text]
  • Countr Brengt Samen Met Coinify Blockchain Betalingen Op De POS Markt
    Dutch Version Countr brengt samen met Coinify blockchain betalingen op de POS markt Nieuwe samenwerking versterkt wereldwijd gebruik van blockchain betalingen (Mei, 11, 2017, Amsterdam) Countr POS, een Nederlandse tablet kassa provider voor kleine tot middelgrote bedrijven, kondigt een strategische samenwerking aan met Coinify, Europa’s meest toonaangevende blockchain betaling service provider. De samenwerking maakt het voor Countr mogelijk om haar aanbod aan alternatieve betalingsmogelijkheden verder uit te breiden. Countr’s Point of Sale (POS), een systeem waarop ondernemers verkopen in real-time kunnen bijhouden en voorraden beheren, ondersteunt blockchain betalingen vanaf nu direct in de app. De ruim 3000 gebruikers van Countr lopen hiermee voorop in het gebruik van blockchain betalingen in de retail industrie en stimuleren hiermee naar verwachting het gebruik van de valuta wereldwijd. “We zijn altijd geïnteresseerd in nieuwe betaling technologieën die onze aangesloten ondernemers kunnen helpen. Blockchain is naar verwachting één van de grootste betaling trends van deze tijd, daarom is het belangrijk om dit in ons systeem te integreren. Coinify heeft onze voorkeur als partner vanwege de veelzijdigheid van de service. Coinify ondersteunt 14 cryptocurrencies, waaronder bitcoin, en biedt payouts in lokale valuta. Een win-win voor Countr en onze ondernemers.” aldus John Staunton, Co-founder en CEO van Countr POS. “Coinify heeft als missie om het gebruik van digitale valuta te stimuleren door iedereen de kans te bieden om alternatieve betalingsmethoden te gebruiken en blockchain betalingen te accepteren. Ik ben trots dat wij er samen met Countr POS in slagen om het aantal blockchain betalingen verder te vergroten, zowel in een online als offline omgeving.” zegt Morten Bebe, sales manager bij Coinify.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Technology Sector Overview of Market Activity in the Financial Technology Sector William Blair & Company
    Quarterly Update Q1 2015 Financial Technology Sector Overview of Market Activity in the Financial Technology Sector William Blair & Company Financial Technology Sector – First Quarter 2015 Update M&A and capital markets activity remained strong during the first quarter of 2015, particularly in the United States. In fact, U.S. stock indices marked all-time highs during the quarter and deal-making activity continued its upward trajectory, propelled by improving confidence among consumers and corporate executives, low-cost credit, and record levels of cash. While market participants largely ignored the prospect of rising interest rates, a collapsing energy sector, global currency concerns, and continued economic uncertainty abroad, this could be an area of concern moving into the second quarter of 2015. One of the most prominent storylines within the financial technology sector in the first quarter was the escalating bets made on payments solutions by the likes of tech giants Apple, Google, and Samsung. The release of Apple Pay unilaterally raised the stakes across the industry and was a catalyst for a wave of high-profile announcements, including Samsung’s acquisition of LoopPay, Google’s acquisition of Softcard, and PayPal’s acquisition of Paydiant. Traditional payments providers are thus being further pressured to accelerate innovation and expand international reach, which has in turn refocused corporate strategies away from building domestic scale and vertical plays toward acquiring differentiated, earlier-stage, technology platforms with global capabilities. Global’s acquisition of Realex, Worldpay’s acquisition of SecureNet, and MasterCard’s acquisition of TNS’s gateway are recent examples of this trend, which we believe will be a significant driver of sector M&A activity going forward.
    [Show full text]
  • Sofia Fintech Mapping 2020 Fintech Sofia - 2020
    SOFIA FINTECH MAPPING 2020 FINTECH SOFIA - 2020 Fintech, short for financial technology, represents the effect of new technologies on the financial sector. The term Fintech stands for new business approaches, products, and services that remodel the common understanding of financial and banking services. Fintech could be any company, whose core business is related to the creation or use of technologies, enabling innovations, facilitating the offering, access, and/or usage of financial services, etc. Historically, the application of innovation and technology in finance in Bulgaria dates back to the late 1960s when the first computers were installed in the Bulgarian banks. Ever since then, despite any economic and political obstacles, Bulgaria has always managed to keep up with financial technology . SOFIA FINTECH LANDSCAPE 2020 Bulgarian Fintech Ecosystem In 2020 Although in 2020 the world is going through an unprecedented crisis devastating for many companies, Fintech has proven comparatively resilient during the COVID-19 pandemic. 3% 3% In 2020, the Bulgarian Fintech ecosystem consists of: • about 100 Fintech companies 4% • operating in 9 different Fintech segments • covering the whole range of products and services 6% • an ever-growing number of startups, VC funds, and angel investors 34% • over 90 IT companies, providing software products and services for Fintechs 7% Figure 1 shows the healthy diversification of the Bulgarian Fintech industry: • the payments/billing segment is the largest contributor to Fintech in the country, followed by lending and capital markets • other booming segments are blockchain/crypto, insurance, and personal finance business, 8% which accumulate about ¼ of all Fintechs in Bulgaria 9% Sofia - The SEE Fintech Hub 13% Sofia, the capital of Bulgaria, is the most preferred location with 83 of the Fintech companies 11% being headquartered there.
    [Show full text]
  • Mpos TRACKER™ JULY 2018
    mPOS TRACKER™ JULY 2018 EASING TAXI DRIVERS’ CASH FLOW HEADACHES WITH MPOS How myPOS tackles the mPOS TSYS purchases The top providers needs of taxi drivers and fleets iMobile3 in the Tracker Scorecard ― page 6 (Feature Story)6 ― page 9 (News and Trends)9 ― page 16 (Tracker16 Scorecard) mPOS Tracker™ © 2018 PYMNTS.com All Rights Reserved TABLEOFCONTENTS PAGE What’s Inside The latest developments from around the mPOS space, from a solution to speed payment 03 device production to TSYS’s iMobile3 acquisition PAGE Feature Story Taxi drivers can’t always wait for card-based fare payments to settle, but they need to have money on hand for refueling and other costs. Cash-only isn’t a winning business approach, either, potentially alienating a large portion 06 of card- and mobile wallet-carrying customers. Irfan Rasmally, business director of myPOS, discusses his company’s mPOS-based approach to making electronic payments more appealing. PAGE News and Trends 09 The latest headlines from the mPOS industry PAGE Top 25 Providers | Scorecard The results are in. See the top scorers and a provider directory featuring roughly 290 players 16 in the space, including four additions. PAGE About 164 Information on PYMNTS.com mPOS Tracker™ © 2018 PYMNTS.com All Rights Reserved July 2018 | 2 WHAT’S INSIDE ayments players from around the mobile point- Americans continue to eschew digital wallets, but they’ve of-sale (mPOS) space are working to encourage been showing greater favor toward in-store mobile contactless payment acceptance in an increasing commerce. Retailers are listening, too, and seeking Pnumber of countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Accounts Guide Last Updated – January 2018
    Classification of Accounts Guide Last updated – January 2018 Contents Part I: General introduction Part II: Residence Part III: Sector categories Part IV.1 – IV.2: Industrial classification Part IV.3: Relationship between sector and industrial classifications Part V.1: Sector components (ESA 10) and sub components Part V.2: List of countries 1 Part I Classification of Accounts Guide – General Introduction I.1 Foreword This guide is intended for all institutions completing a range of Bank of England statistical returns. It describes the two most important systems of classification used in compiling economic and financial statistics in the United Kingdom – the economic sector classification, and the industrial classification. This guide is intended to serve both as an introduction for newcomers and as a source of reference. The nomenclature in the sector classification is in line with international standards – in particular, the European System of National and Regional Accounts (abbreviated to ‘ESA10’). In addition, the analysis of industrial activity is in line with the 2007 standard industrial classification of economic activities (SIC) introduced by the Office for National Statistics. Those without knowledge of accounts classification are recommended to refer to the ‘Guide to Classification’ (Part I Section 3) which takes the reader through the main questions to be answered to help classify accounts correctly. The system of classification used in this guide is solely for statistical purposes. Parts II to IV of the guide describe the main aspects of the classification system in more detail, including lists of examples of institutions, or a web link reference, for many categories. I.2 An introduction to the classification of accounts Sector and industrial classification To understand the underlying behaviour which is reflected in movements in economic and financial statistics, it is necessary to group those entities engaged in financial transactions into broad sectors with similar characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Securities and Exchange Commission Form
    11/6/2019 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1655050/000110465919060503/a19-17620_110q.htm 10-Q 1 a19-17620_110q.htm 10-Q Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q (Mark One) x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2019 OR o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission file number: 814-01175 BAIN CAPITAL SPECIALTY FINANCE, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 81-2878769 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 200 Clarendon Street, 37th Floor Boston, MA 02116 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (617) 516-2000 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share BCSF New York Stock Exchange Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
    [Show full text]
  • Tokyo 100Ventures 101 Digital 11:FS 1982 Ventures 22Seven 2C2P
    Who’s joining money’s BIGGEST CONVERSATION? @Tokyo ACI Worldwide Alawneh Exchange Apiture Association of National Advertisers 100Ventures Acton Capital Partners Alerus Financial AppBrilliance Atlantic Capital Bank 101 Digital Actvide AG Align Technology AppDome Atom Technologies 11:FS Acuminor AlixPartners AppFolio Audi 1982 Ventures Acuris ALLCARD INC. Appian AusPayNet 22seven Adobe Allevo Apple Authomate 2C2P Cash and Card Payment ADP Alliance Data Systems AppsFlyer Autodesk Processor Adyen Global Payments Alliant Credit Union Aprio Avant Money 500 Startups Aerospike Allianz Apruve Avantcard 57Blocks AEVI Allica Bank Limited Arbor Ventures Avantio 5Point Credit Union AFEX Altamont Capital Partners ARIIX Avast 5X Capital Affinipay Alterna Savings Arion bank AvidXchange 7 Seas Consultants Limited Affinity Federal Credit Union Altimetrik Arroweye Solutions Avinode A Cloud Guru Affirm Alto Global Processing Aruba Bank Aviva Aadhar Housing Finance Limited African Bank Altra Federal Credit Union Arvest Bank AXA Abercrombie & Kent Agmon & Co Alvarium Investments Asante Financial Services Group Axway ABN AMRO Bank AgUnity Amadeus Ascension Ventures AZB & Partners About Fraud AIG Japan Holdings Amazon Ascential Azlo Abto Software Aimbridge Hospitality American Bankers Association Asian Development Bank Bahrain Economic Development ACAMS Air New Zealand American Express AsiaPay Board Accenture Airbnb Amsterdam University of Applied Asignio Bain & Company Accepted Payments aircrex Sciences Aspen Capital Fund Ballard Spahr LLP Acciones y Valores
    [Show full text]