DOCSLIB.ORG

Download File

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download File EXPLICIT REFERENCES TO NEW TESTAMENT VARIANT READINGS AMONG GREEK AND LATIN CHURCH FATHERS VOLUME II A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Notre Dame in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Amy M. Donaldson _______________________________ Brian Daley, Director Graduate Program in Theology Notre Dame, Indiana December 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME TWO: TEXTS Introduction . 335 Catalogue . 344 Additional Texts . 548 Appendixes . 578 Bibliography . 621 x INTRODUCTION 1. Sources The starting point for the Catalogue was Metzger‘s expanded list (based on Nestle‘s original) of explicit references to variants among the fathers.1 Since this list includes only names and Scripture references, it was necessary to find each of these texts within the works of each father.2 Search engines, such as the Thesaurus Linguae Graecae and Patrologia Latina, have been invaluable in finding these texts and further augmenting this list through a search of key phrases. Since Nestle‘s and Metzger‘s lists were compiled primarily through a manual search of Tischendorf‘s apparatus,3 this also provided an important resource; in at least one instance where no additional source has been located for the patristic quotation in question, Tischendorf himself has been used as the cited source. In imitation of this strategy, the apparatuses of NA27 and UBS4 have also been manually scoured for references not included in Metzger‘s list. A combination 1 Bruce M. Metzger, ―St. Jerome‘s Explicit References to Variant Readings in Manuscripts of the New Testament‖ in Text and Interpretation: Studies in the New Testament Presented to Matthew Black (ed. E. Best and R. McL. Wilson; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1979), 188-90. Cf. E. Nestle, Einführung in das griechische Neue Testament (2nd ed.; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1899), 266-67; Introduction to the Textual Criticism of the Greek New Testament (trans. W. Edie; Williams and Norgate, 1901), 165-67. The lists are presented in a comparative chart in Appendix A, below. 2 Due to this limited nature of Metzger‘s list, unearthing all texts on the list was challenging, and at some points has thus far proved impossible (this is especially true for examples that apparently were culled from the apparatus of a previous edition of UBS but no longer appear in UBS4—these may in fact not be explicit references to variants, which is why they could not be located). For this reason, not all items on Metzger‘s list are included in the Catalogue; other texts were excluded because they did not qualify as explicit references to known variants. See the chart in Appendix A. 3 Constantin von Tischendorf, Novum Testamentum Graece (2 vols.; 8th ed. critica maior; 1872; repr. Graz, Austria: Akademische Druck, 1965). Metzger also expanded this list by searching through the UBS apparatus, prior to the 4th edition. 335 of these methods has provided a representative, if not comprehensive, list of explicit references to variant readings among the Greek and Latin church fathers. 2. Parameters In order to facilitate broader use of the Catalogue beyond the limitations of the present study, the net has been cast widely to glean as many references as possible, extending as late as the 12th century. For the Greek authors, the basic criterion to identify an explicit reference to a variant is that the author indicates knowledge of more than one reading for a specific word or passage. The variant need not be attested elsewhere, but it must clearly be part of the MS tradition rather than merely a suggested emendation; however, since the line between known variants and conjectures is sometimes blurry (and since the latter are also valuable for understanding textual scholarship in antiquity), speculative discussions have also been included but are relegated to a separate section, the Additional Texts. Among the Latin authors, issues of translation complicate the matter. When a Latin father mentions multiple readings in the NT text, it can be any one of at least four types: (1) comparison of the Greek term with the Latin equivalent without any discernment of MS traditions; (2) comparison of Greek MSS with the Latin, or vice versa; (3) differentiation between various Latin MSS; or (4) merely a discussion of translation options, either differences between the Greek and Latin meanings or different Latin renderings of the Greek (as attested in the MSS or proposed by the author). These four types of discussions thus provide the following evidence (in agreement with the numbering above): (1) comparison of the Old Latin, Itala, or Vulgate as a version against 336 the Greek tradition; (2) distinction of trends among Greek or Latin MSS; (3) information about the Old Latin, Itala, or Vulgate without reference to the Greek; or (4) translation options rather than variants (unless the different translations emerge from separate Greek variants). While information about the Latin versions is important to NT textual criticism, the purpose of the Catalogue is to provide evidence for the Greek text, and therefore only discussions that testify to Greek variants are included. For this reason and the constraints of space and time, the Latin material is intended only to be representative, not comprehensive, as a supplement to the Greek material; without the Latin material, any discussion of the Greek text, especially in the 4th and 5th centuries, would be incomplete.4 Therefore, the Latin material that testifies to or reinforces Greek variants has been included in the Catalogue, whereas discussions relating to issues of translation or variants known strictly in the Latin tradition have been excluded or relegated to the Additional Texts. Some of the latter have been included in this study only because they appear in either Nestle‘s or Metzger‘s list. 3. Limitations When Nestle and Metzger enthusiastically recommended a study such as this, their words held much hope and promise for the objective value of this material in comparison with the subjective discussions of patristic quotations and allusions. But any study based on patristic materials is riddled with its own problems, and so this Catalogue, 4 Unfortunately, the choice to exclude the Syriac evidence also limits the conclusions that may be drawn (see further comments on the Syriac in the General Introduction). However, the valuable Syriac discussions on variants appear to come predominantly from a later period than is of primary interest here, making their absence more of a gap in the Catalogue than in the analysis in Volume I. 337 while useful, will not yield as much concrete data as they had hoped.5 One chief problem is the issue of critical editions. While the Catalogue makes use of the most recent critical texts of each patristic author‘s work whenever possible, the dearth of critical editions for many church fathers has made reliance on Migne an unfortunate necessity at some points. As noted above, in at least one instance (see also the notes in Appendix A) the quotation could not be located in Migne or a critical edition and is therefore cited from Tischendorf since his own source could not be accessed. A further issue is attribution. Many of the texts given here are found among the catenae, for which authorship is often dubious; some texts are found both within a later commentary and separately in a scholion attributed to a different author (particularly Origen); and other texts are found within dubious or spurious works. Even those works that are generally considered authentic may be disputed by some scholars, or the portion of the work within which the quoted text falls may be in doubt. In the interest of casting the net widely, the Catalogue includes all such dubious and spurious texts; while they do have value by illustrating broader trends in which variants are commented upon and common arguments are used to weigh variants, such texts are of limited value in discussions for specific fathers, places, or eras (and therefore are generally not discussed in the analysis in Chaps. 2-4). 4. Format Each catalogue entry provides the text and translation for the quotation of the explicit reference, along with the other external evidence and a brief discussion of the 5 This point is discussed more fully in the General Introduction and the Conclusion. 338 quotation‘s context and/or the variant‘s treatment by the author. The entries are arranged in canonical order, then in alphabetical order by author. The Greek and Latin fathers are intermingled. As noted above, those examples that are purely conjecture on the part of the author (no variants are attested or expressly cited) or possibly witness only the Latin tradition or translational rather then textual variation, and are still worth including, have been placed in the Additional Texts. However, on a few occasions passages better placed in Additional Texts have been retained in the Catalogue in order to keep discussions of particular variants gathered in one place. 4.1. Number, Author, and Work Each text, or pair of texts from the same work, has been given a paragraph number to be used in Volume I for ease of reference (e.g., §25). Passages in the Additional Texts are included in the Catalogue numbering to keep them within the canonical order. When multiple authors address a specific variant or verse, their texts are arranged alphabetically by the author under whose name the text has been published; when there are multiple discussions for a variant by the same author, an attempt has been made to place these in chronological order. In some instances, the text is actually a dubious or spurious work (generally referred to here as ―Pseudo-,‖ following Nestle and Metzger). In the case of scholia that have been attributed to different authors by different editors, both authors and citations are given together, along with both copies of the text if they differ significantly.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Naked Runaway and the Enrobed Reporter of Mark 14 and 16: What Is the Author Doing with What He Is Saying?
    JETS 54.3 (September 2011) 527–45 THE NAKED RUNAWAY AND THE ENROBED REPORTER OF MARK 14 AND 16: WHAT IS THE AUTHOR DOING WITH WHAT HE IS SAYING? !"#!$!% &'#'()**!* There is no question that Mark 14:51–52 is a major crux of Mark’s Gos- pel—the account of a “young man” +eeing naked from the scene as Jesus was arrested. 1 These verses are “a total enigma,” concluded Morna Hooker. A “bizarre episode,” said Eugene Boring. Francis Moloney called it a “strange passage.” “Confusing” and “unclear,” labeled Robert Stein. “[M]akes no sense as an actual incident,” claimed Robin Scroggs and Kent Gro,. “Whimsical,” declared John Knox. 2 This degree of interpretive chaos has resulted in an inordinate amount of speculation, inversely proportional to the evangelist’s reticence, as many a scholar and preacher has exercised upon this crux his or her own expository creativity. The reason for these hermeneutical acrobat- ics is obvious: if 14:51–52 is erased from the account—which apparently is what Matthew and Luke did in their respective Gospels (Matt 26:56–57; Luke 22:54)—what is left actually makes for a seamless reading of a coherent story. 3 But, as far as scholarship can tell us, those two verses remain in the canonical version and -nal form of the Gospel of Mark; and so, preachers have to make some sense of this perplexing text situated in this locus in Mark’s passion. Hence, the proliferation of explanations, particularly dealing with the identity of the “young man” (νεανίσκος) in 14:51–52, who “appears out of nowhere at the wrong place in the story, at the wrong place in the text, like a clown at a funeral, this τις [a certain] young man, this unnamed literary follower following the departure of all followers.” 4 Howard Jackson concludes that, “freed of the shackles of narrative coherence and contextual integrity, many * Abraham Kuruvilla is associate professor of pastoral ministries at Dallas Theological Seminary, 3909 Swiss Ave., Dallas, TX 75204.
    [Show full text]
  • Registered in England and Wales, Wholly Owned
    RELATED UNDERTAKINGS In accordance with Section 409 of the Companies Act 2006 a full list of subsidiaries, partnerships, associates and joint ventures, the principal activity, the country of incorporation and the effective percentage of equity owned, as at 30 September 2017 are disclosed below. With the exception of Imperial Tobacco Holdings (2007) Limited, which is wholly owned by the Company, none of the shares in the subsidiaries is held directly by the Company. SUBSIDIARIES: REGISTERED IN ENGLAND AND WALES, WHOLLY OWNED Name Principal activity and registered address Attendfriend Limited Dormant 121 Winterstoke Road, Bristol, BS3 2LL, England British Tobacco Company Limited Dormant 121 Winterstoke Road, Bristol, BS3 2LL, England Congar International UK Limited Dormant 121 Winterstoke Road, Bristol, BS3 2LL, England Fontem UK Limited In liquidation BDO LLP, Two Snowhill, Birmingham, B4 6GA, England Imperial Brands Enterprise Finance Limited Provision of treasury services to other Group companies 121 Winterstoke Road, Bristol, BS3 2LL, England Imperial Brands Finance PLC Provision of treasury services to other Group companies 121 Winterstoke Road, Bristol, BS3 2LL, England Imperial Investments Limited Dormant 121 Winterstoke Road, Bristol, BS3 2LL, England Imperial Tobacco Altadis Limited Provision of finance to other Group companies 121 Winterstoke Road, Bristol, BS3 2LL, England Imperial Tobacco Capital Assets (1) Provision of finance to other Group companies 121 Winterstoke Road, Bristol, BS3 2LL, England Imperial Tobacco Capital Assets
    [Show full text]
  • Cruciformed ! Mark's Story of Jesus and His Disciples
    CRUCIFORMED ! MARK’S STORY OF JESUS AND HIS DISCIPLES A literary study of the narrative of Mark’s Gospel with insights and conversation starters in twenty sessions A resource for the Book of Faith initiative within the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America THE REV. DR. MARK I. WEGENER RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA [email protected] Copyright © 2015 This page is intentionally left blank so you can photocopy the pages back-to- back without losing the sequence. CRUCIFORMED ! MARK’S STORY OF JESUS AND HIS DISCIPLES From all inductions, the gospel according to Mark is the first to call the story of Jesus a St. Mark is the earliest of the four gospels in “gospel.” At that time “gospel” or “evangel” the New Testament. Most likely it was written was almost a technical term for an official around 70 CE, shortly before or after the announcement that a new emperor was arriv- Roman armies captured Jerusalem and de- ing, or that a city or territory was to receive stroyed the temple. special treatment, such as a reduction in taxes. Of course, no one knows exactly who wrote Perhaps the political connotation of “gospel” this document. Traditionally the name of is why the accounts of Matthew, Luke and John Mark, a companion of both the apostles John do not explicitly refer to themselves as Paul and Peter, has been associated with it. “gospels.” But the evidence that this person is the actual author is slim at a best. Third, Mark provided the pattern which was later used by the authors of Matthew and And exactly where it was written and for Luke.
    [Show full text]
  • Ana María Fernández, Le Lettere Di Maria
    ORIZZONTI a cura della Pontificia Facoltà di Scienze dell’Educazione «Auxilium» di Roma 20. ANA MARÍA FERNÁNDEZ LE LETTERE DI MARIA DOMENICA MAZZARELLO TESTIMONI E MEDIAZIONE DI UNA MISSIONE CARISMATICA ANA MARÍA FERNÁNDEZ LE LETTERE DI MARIA DOMENICA MAZZARELLO TESTIMONI E MEDIAZIONE DI UNA MISSIONE CARISMATICA LAS - ROMA Alle Figlie di Maria Ausiliatrice mie sorelle © 2006 by LAS - Libreria Ateneo Salesiano Piazza dell’Ateneo Salesiano, 1 - 00139 ROMA Tel. 06 87290626 - Fax 06 87290629 - e-mail: [email protected] - http://las.ups.urbe.it ISBN 88-213-0616-X ––––––––––––– Elaborazione elettronica: LAS ❏ Stampa: Tip. Abilgraph - Via Pietro Ottoboni 11 - Roma PRESENTAZIONE Lo studio delle primizie di un carisma è percorso obbligato per la comprensione di una grazia ecclesiale, un dono di Dio per l’intero suo popolo, concentrato nella nascita di un gruppo particolare, nell’illu- minazione di una parola del Vangelo, nella risposta di Dio, costante lungo la storia della Chiesa, ai bisogni dell’evangelizzazione e della missione. È percorso necessario perché la persona insignita di una tale grazia – grazia di sequela di Cristo, di comprensione del suo mistero di amo- re e servizio della Chiesa – si trova in modo particolare sotto la luce e la forza dello Spirito Santo, fonte di ogni carisma. Questo Spirito non soltanto suscita una nuova famiglia spirituale, ma concede, con il do- no di una feconda maternità, una particolare capacità di attrattiva umana nei Fondatori e Fondatrici, una specifica grazia di generare spiritualmente nuovi Figli o Figlie, di educare le persone nella concre- tezza dei nuovi problemi, delle nuove circostanze e della novità inedi- ta di una vita e di un apostolato, per guidare concretamente, nell’uma- no della storia, il disegno divino che viene dall’eternità.
    [Show full text]
  • Profile of a Plant: the Olive in Early Medieval Italy, 400-900 CE By
    Profile of a Plant: The Olive in Early Medieval Italy, 400-900 CE by Benjamin Jon Graham A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) in the University of Michigan 2014 Doctoral Committee: Professor Paolo Squatriti, Chair Associate Professor Diane Owen Hughes Professor Richard P. Tucker Professor Raymond H. Van Dam © Benjamin J. Graham, 2014 Acknowledgements Planting an olive tree is an act of faith. A cultivator must patiently protect, water, and till the soil around the plant for fifteen years before it begins to bear fruit. Though this dissertation is not nearly as useful or palatable as the olive’s pressed fruits, its slow growth to completion resembles the tree in as much as it was the patient and diligent kindness of my friends, mentors, and family that enabled me to finish the project. Mercifully it took fewer than fifteen years. My deepest thanks go to Paolo Squatriti, who provoked and inspired me to write an unconventional dissertation. I am unable to articulate the ways he has influenced my scholarship, teaching, and life. Ray Van Dam’s clarity of thought helped to shape and rein in my run-away ideas. Diane Hughes unfailingly saw the big picture—how the story of the olive connected to different strands of history. These three people in particular made graduate school a humane and deeply edifying experience. Joining them for the dissertation defense was Richard Tucker, whose capacious understanding of the history of the environment improved this work immensely. In addition to these, I would like to thank David Akin, Hussein Fancy, Tom Green, Alison Cornish, Kathleen King, Lorna Alstetter, Diana Denney, Terre Fisher, Liz Kamali, Jon Farr, Yanay Israeli, and Noah Blan, all at the University of Michigan, for their benevolence.
    [Show full text]
  • General Index
    General Index Italicized page numbers indicate figures and tables. Color plates are in- cussed; full listings of authors’ works as cited in this volume may be dicated as “pl.” Color plates 1– 40 are in part 1 and plates 41–80 are found in the bibliographical index. in part 2. Authors are listed only when their ideas or works are dis- Aa, Pieter van der (1659–1733), 1338 of military cartography, 971 934 –39; Genoa, 864 –65; Low Coun- Aa River, pl.61, 1523 of nautical charts, 1069, 1424 tries, 1257 Aachen, 1241 printing’s impact on, 607–8 of Dutch hamlets, 1264 Abate, Agostino, 857–58, 864 –65 role of sources in, 66 –67 ecclesiastical subdivisions in, 1090, 1091 Abbeys. See also Cartularies; Monasteries of Russian maps, 1873 of forests, 50 maps: property, 50–51; water system, 43 standards of, 7 German maps in context of, 1224, 1225 plans: juridical uses of, pl.61, 1523–24, studies of, 505–8, 1258 n.53 map consciousness in, 636, 661–62 1525; Wildmore Fen (in psalter), 43– 44 of surveys, 505–8, 708, 1435–36 maps in: cadastral (See Cadastral maps); Abbreviations, 1897, 1899 of town models, 489 central Italy, 909–15; characteristics of, Abreu, Lisuarte de, 1019 Acequia Imperial de Aragón, 507 874 –75, 880 –82; coloring of, 1499, Abruzzi River, 547, 570 Acerra, 951 1588; East-Central Europe, 1806, 1808; Absolutism, 831, 833, 835–36 Ackerman, James S., 427 n.2 England, 50 –51, 1595, 1599, 1603, See also Sovereigns and monarchs Aconcio, Jacopo (d. 1566), 1611 1615, 1629, 1720; France, 1497–1500, Abstraction Acosta, José de (1539–1600), 1235 1501; humanism linked to, 909–10; in- in bird’s-eye views, 688 Acquaviva, Andrea Matteo (d.
    [Show full text]
  • Textual Variation: Theological and Social Motivation
    University of Birmingham An Introduction to Greek New Testament Commentaries with a Preliminary Checklist of New Testament Catena Manuscripts Houghton, Hugh; Parker, David License: None: All rights reserved Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (Harvard): Houghton, H & Parker, D 2016, An Introduction to Greek New Testament Commentaries with a Preliminary Checklist of New Testament Catena Manuscripts. in H Houghton (ed.), Commentaries, Catenae and Biblical Tradition., 1, Texts and Studies third series, no. 3.13, Gorgias Press, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 1-36, The Ninth Birmingham Colloquium on the Textual Criticism of the New Testament, Birmingham, United Kingdom, 2/03/15. <http://gorgiaspress.com/bookshop/download/Commentaries,%20Catenae%20and%20Biblical%20Tradition.pdf > Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: Eligibility for repository: Checked on 10/5/2016 General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain.
    [Show full text]
  • "On the Relations of Canaanite Exploration to Pre-Historic Classic
    176 ON THE RELATIONS OF CANAANITE EXPLORATION These inecriptions, and the bas-reliefs on the monument called Kamna Hurmill, in Crelo-Syria, near the source of the Orontes, and possibly of the same pe1·iod, are an enigma, as yet, to the most learned Orientaliots. It is to be hoped, however, now that attention is again called to the subject, that the clue may be found that shall unlock their meaning, and that Northern 8yI"ia will be no longer overlooked by tho explorer. DISCOVERY AT THE l\IOSQUE EL AKS.A, JERUSALEM.-llo A DISCOVERY of considerable interest has been made in this :Mosque by the Rev. J. Neil, who has only recently gone to Jerusalem for the Society for the Conversion of the Jews. "In the Mosque of El Aksa," he writes, "you will remember that there is a long plain room opening out at the south-east angle, called the Mosque of Omar, in which the only object of interest whatever is a recess supported by two twisted pillars, and called the Mihrab, or Praying-place of Omar. You may, perhaps, remember that the pillars on each side of this recess, of Solomonic twisted pattern and polished marble, appear to have been turned upside down, and to have their capitals of greyish stone in broken leaf-like patterns below. On vi~iting this the day before yesterday, July 5th, I discovered that a great part of the yellowish plaster had been removed from the top of these pillars, and that rich grotesquely carved capitals were exposed to view in an admirable state of preserva­ tion.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Classics Library New Acquisitions February 2019 1
    UC Classics Library New Acquisitions February 2019 1. Res publica litterarum. Lawrence, Kan., University of Kansas. S. Prete, 2083 Wescoe Hall, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 66045. LOCATION = CLASS Journals. AS30 .R47 v.39(2016). 2. Philosophenwege / Wolfram Hoepfner. Konstanz : UVK Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, [2018]. Xenia (Konstanz, Germany) ; Heft 52. LOCATION = CLASS Oversize. B173 .H647 2018. 3. Speeches for the dead : essays on Plato's Menexenus / edited by Harold Parker and Jan Maximilian Robitzsch. Berlin ; Boston : De Gruyter, [2018]. Beiträge zur Altertumskunde ; 368. LOCATION = CLASS Stacks. B376.M46 P37 2018. 4. Metafisica e scienza negli antichi e nei moderni / a cura di Elisabetta Cattanei e Laura Stochino. Lecce : Milella, [2017]. LOCATION = CLASS Stacks. B485 .M375 2017. 5. Dynamis : sens et genèse de la notion aristotélicienne de puissance / par David Lefebvre. Paris : Librairie philosophique J. Vrin, 2018. Bibliothèque d'histoire de la philosophie. Nouvelle série. LOCATION = CLASS Stacks. B491.P66 L44 2018. 6. La vertu en acte chez Aristote : une sagesse propre à la vie heureuse / Gilles Guigues. Paris : L'Harmattan, [2016]. Collection L'ouverture philosophique. LOCATION = CLASS Stacks. B491.V57 G84 2016. 7. Politics and philosophy at Rome : collected papers / Miriam T. Griffin ; edited by Catalina Balmaceda. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2018. LOCATION = CLASS Stacks. B505 .G75 2018. 8. Apprendre à penser avec Marc Aurèle / Robert Tirvaudey. Paris : L'Harmattan, [2017]. Collection L'ouverture philosophique. LOCATION = CLASS Stacks. B583 .T57 2017. 9. Les principes cosmologiques du platonisme : origines, influences et systématisation / études réunies et éditées par Marc-Antoine Gavray et Alexandra Michalewski. Turnhout, Belgium : Brepols, [2017]. Monothéismes et philosophie. LOCATION = CLASS Stacks.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses The Meletian schism at antioch Barker, Celia B. How to cite: Barker, Celia B. (1974) The Meletian schism at antioch, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/9969/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk THE MSLETIAN SCHISM AT ANTIOCH THE MELETIAN SCHISM AT ANTIOCH THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM BY CELIA B. BARKER, B.A. (Dunelm) FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS Department of Theology, Date: April,1974. University of Durham. (1) The object of this thesis is to examine the schism in the Church of Antioch during the Arian Controversy of the Fourth century, with a view to establishing what coherent order, if any, can be found in the course of events, and to show how the interaction of theological emphases and personal prejudices exacerbated and prolonged the Antiochene divisions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Whole Works of Roger Ascham
    THE WHOLE WORKS OF EOGER ASCHAM, NOW FIRST COLLECTED AND REVISED, WITH A LIFE OF THE AUTHOR; BY THE REV. DR. GILES, FORMERLY FELLOW OF C. C. C. , OXFORD. VOL. III. LONDON: JOHN RUSSELL SMITH, SOHO SQUARE. 3864. PRINTED BY BOWDEN AND BRAWN, 13, PRINCES STREET, LITTLE QUEEN STREET, HOLBORN, LONDON. PKEFACE TO VOL. III. OF the first work contained in this volume, "A Report and Discourse of the Affairs and State of Germany, <kc" I have seen but one edition afac-simile separate ; of its title is prefixed to our reprint of the work. It is in small quarto, and has no date; but it is known to have been printed in 1552, and again in 1570. The copy which I have seen, is in the British Museum, and has furnished, besides many smaller cor rections, more than one whole sentence that had been omitted in the last edition of the English Works, 8vo, 1815. 2. The School-master also is here printed from the " English Works of Roger Ascham," collated through out with the earlier editions, which have furnished several important corrections of the text. This work was first published by Mrs Ascham, small 8vo, 1570, after her husband's death : a fac-simile of IV PREFACE. the title to that edition is prefixed to the work in the present reprint. The School-master was again printed in 1571, 1573, 1579, 1583, 1589, these editions vary very little the one from the other. It was again published, with notes by the Rev. James Upton, London, 8vo, 1711, and reprinted 1743.
    [Show full text]
  • Vii. Aelii Augusti Liberti
    Paul Weaver: Repertorium Familiae Caesaris – Aelii Augusti Liberti 223 VII. AELII AUGUSTI LIBERTI 1401 T. Aelius Aug. lib. A[---] AE 1973, 39 Rome: [t ae]LIUS T F PAL [---] / T AELI AUG LIB A[--- et] ULPIAE MARCEL[linae theatr. filius?] / HABUIT VIVAR[ium et curam?] SUPRA IUMENTA [caesaris] / Marcelli MILITAVIT ¢ LEG[---] / COH III HASTAT P[rior v ann] / XXXVI M [---] A B R *3:’vivarium’= ‘game park, animal reserve’. A freeborn citizen son of a freedman of Antoninus Pius and an Ulpia could not have been born before 138. If it can be assumed that he lived for 36 years, reaching the rank of centurion in the army and a post in charge of pack animals, this inscription must date from the last years of M. Aurelius or even the reign of Commodus. His mother Ulpia Marcellina, with a nomen from two reigns earlier than that of her husband and a cognomen that is rarely servile, was most probably freeborn, whether or not the latter had been manumitted at the time of their marriage. 1402 T. Aelius [Aug. lib.] A[---] Miscellanea greca e romana 11, 1987, 239-41 = AE 1987, 100 Rome D[m] / T T AELII [aug lib] / FELIX ET A[---] / MATRI DULC[issimae et] / LIB C D LIBERTAB[usque] / POSTERISQUE [eorum] / ET AUREL URBANAE FELI[cis san]/CTISSIMAE ET LIB LIBERTA[busque poste]/RISQ EORUM *2: the reading ‘TT’ is confirmed from the photo in MGR. It is plausible that both Felix and A[---] are Augusti liberti. The name of their mother, the dedicand, either has to be squeezed into the end of line 3 (or 4?) or curiously, appears not to have been recorded.
    [Show full text]