DOCSLIB.ORG

Yellowstone Bison: Conserving an American Icon in Modern Society

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Yellowstone Bison: Conserving an American Icon in Modern Society YELLOWSTONE BISON conserving an AMERICAN ICON in modern society EDITED BY P.J. White, Rick L. Wallen, and David E. Hallac YELLOWSTONE BISON Yellowstone Bison: Conserving an American Icon in Modern Society Editors P.J. White, Rick L. Wallen, and David E. Hallac Contributing Authors Katrina L. Auttelet, Douglas W. Blanton, Amanda M. Bramblett, Chris Geremia, Tim C. Reid, Jessica M. Richards, Tobin W. Roop, Dylan R. Schneider, Angela J. Stewart, John J. Treanor, and Jesse R. White Contributing Editor Jennifer A. Jerrett YELLOWSTONE ASSOCIATION YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK, USA, 2015 P.J. White is the Chief of Wildlife and Aquatic Resources at Yellowstone National Park. Rick L. Wallen is the Bison Project Leader at Yellowstone National Park. David E. Hallac was the Division Chief of the Yellowstone Center for Resources at Yellowstone National Park between 2011-2014. The Yellowstone Association, Yellowstone National Park 82190 Published 2015 Printed in the United States of America All chapters are prepared solely by officers or employees of the United States government as part of their official duties and are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Foreign copyrights may apply. National Park Service (NPS) photographs are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Foreign copyrights may apply. However, because this work may contain other copyrighted images or other incorporated material, permission from the copyright holder may be necessary. Cover image: NPS/Neal Herbert. Half title image: NPS/Jacob W. Frank. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Yellowstone bison : conserving an American icon in modern society / edited by P.J. White, Rick L. Wallen, and David E. Hallac ; contributing authors, Katrina L. Auttelet [and 10 others] ; contributing editor, Jennifer A. Jerrett. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-934948-30-2 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. American bison--Conservation--Yellowstone National Park. 2. American bison-- Conservation--United States. 3. Wildlife conservation--Yellowstone National Park. 4. Wildlife conservation--United States. 5. Wildlife management--Yellowstone National Park. I. White, P. J. (Patrick James) II. Wallen, Rick L. III. Hallac, David E. IV. Auttelet, Katrina L. V. Jerrett, Jennifer A. QL737.U53Y45 2015 599.64’30978752--dc23 2015004628 The authors gratefully acknowledge the generous contribution of the Yellowstone Association, whose publication grant enabled the production of this book. Contents Preface ix Daniel N. Wenk, Superintendent, Yellowstone National Park Introduction xiii P.J. White, Rick L. Wallen, and David E. Hallac Chapter 1: The Population 1 Douglas W. Blanton, P.J. White, Rick L. Wallen, Katrina L. Auttelet, Angela J. Stewart, and Amanda M. Bramblett Chapter 2: Brucellosis 19 P.J. White, David E. Hallac, Rick L. Wallen, and Jesse R. White Chapter 3: Historical Perspective 45 Rick L. Wallen, P.J. White, and Chris Geremia Chapter 4: Seasonal Distributions and Movements 67 Chris Geremia, P.J. White, Rick L. Wallen, and Douglas W. Blanton Chapter 5: Reproduction and Survival 83 Chris Geremia, P.J. White, Rick L. Wallen, and Douglas W. Blanton Chapter 6: Nutritional Ecology 97 John J. Treanor, Jessica M. Richards, and Dylan R. Schneider Chapter 7: Ecological Role 107 Rick L. Wallen, P.J. White, and Chris Geremia Chapter 8: Adaptive Capabilities and Genetics 119 Rick L. Wallen and P.J. White Chapter 9: Cultural Importance 131 Rick L. Wallen, P.J. White, and Tobin W. Roop Chapter 10: Current Management 141 P.J. White, Rick L. Wallen, David E. Hallac, Chris Geremia, John J. Treanor, Douglas W. Blanton, and Tim C. Reid Chapter 11: The Future 159 P.J. White, Rick L. Wallen, Chris Geremia, John J. Treanor, and David E. Hallac Acknowledgments 179 Glossary of Terms 181 References 197 Index 243 Abbreviations used in citations: APHIS Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service MDOL Montana Department of Livestock MFWP Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks NPS National Park Service USDA United States [U.S.] Department of Agriculture USDI U.S. Department of the Interior USFS U.S. Forest Service YNP Yellowstone National Park Recommended citation format: Entire book.—White, P. J., R. L. Wallen, D. E. Hallac, and J. A. Jerrett, editors. 2015. Yellowstone bison—Conserving an American icon in modern society. Yellowstone Association, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming. Individual chapter.—Wallen, R. L., P. J. White, and C. Geremia. 2015. Historical perspective. Pages 45-65 in P. J. White, R. L. Wallen, D. E. Hallac, and J. A. Jerrett, editors. Yellowstone bison—Conserving an American icon in modern society. Yellowstone Association, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming. Photograph courtesy of National Geographic by Michael Nichols Bison in winter, Yellowstone National Park. Preface Daniel N. Wenk, Superintendent, Yellowstone National Park MY ASSOCIATION WITH bison management in Yellowstone National Park began in the early 1980s when I worked for Superintendents John Townsley and Bob Barbee. Back then, there were fewer than 2,500 bison and the central herd was the largest herd in the park. Also, bison were not yet making seasonal migrations past the north and west boundaries of the national park. Because bison were not leaving the park, brucellosis within the population was less of a concern. Bison contributed greatly to the enjoyment of the park by visitors as part of the incredible wildlife display. Much has changed. About three decades later, when I was prepar- ing to return to the park as Superintendent beginning February of 2011, I was made aware of a court-mediated settlement regarding the management of bison signed by the Secretaries of Agriculture and the Interior and the Governor of Montana. But my knowledge came from a distance, and I did not yet fully understand or appreciate the complexity of management or the intensity of emotion and conflict that was occurring on the boundaries of Yellowstone National Park. x YELLOWSTONE BISON: CONSERVING AN AMERICAN ICON IN MODERN SOCIETY My education came quick. The winter of 2010-2011 was harsh and bison were moving into the Gardiner basin of Montana in large num- bers. Within two weeks of my arrival in the park, I was in Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer’s office in the state capital to discuss bison management. The Governor suggested methods to control population numbers and brucellosis, including a proposal to hunt bison within the national park. I rejected this proposal because it was contrary to law, regulation, and policy of the National Park Service and Yellowstone. It was also unnecessary; the park could ecologically support the bison population and we were successfully managing the population without hunting in the park. In an unexpected turn of events, and what would become my first lesson in the politics of bison management, Governor Schweitzer issued an Executive Order prohibiting the shipment of bison on state high- ways. The hands of the National Park Service were tied. That winter, approximately 850 bison were held in capture facilities until early May when they migrated back into the park. What I learned in my first weeks as Superintendent is that the science, so well-highlighted in this book, must be joined with the strength and commitment of people to successfully manage a wide-roaming bison population and prevent brucellosis transmission to cattle. Many of these individuals are the authors of this book: wildlife biologists, law- enforcement officers, and others who are the experts in the field of bison management. Herein, they clearly articulate not only the science, but also, the cultural and political significance of bison management. During my time in Yellowstone, I have watched with great inter- est — and some amazement — that bison are vilified as the primary threat or vector for brucellosis transmission in the ecosystem. There is an illusory belief that if brucellosis were eliminated in bison it would be eliminated from the ecosystem. The authors show clearly that this sce- nario is unlikely, and that bison make up a small portion of the overall risk for brucellosis transmission to cattle. Bison are a wildlife icon in America, and Yellowstone bison represent one of the greatest wildlife conservation stories in our nation’s history. PREFACE xi The authors provide a compelling history of the conservation of bison from the early 1900s to the management of bison in modern society. This book is based on the best available science, understanding the importance of bison in the American Indian culture, understanding brucellosis and the role bison play in the ecology of the Greater Yel- lowstone Area, and an understanding of the stakeholders and local community issues. It informs our collective management and commit- ment to wild bison on the landscape. The iconic bison deserves our best efforts to assure its place on the American landscape. I am grateful to the authors for clearly articulat- ing the issues we face as we collectively determine the future of these animals. The authors have given us a chance to advance our discussions based on a common understanding of the science, culture, and politics surrounding bison. NPS/Neal Herbert Clouds and bison across Hayden Valley, Yellowstone National Park. Introduction P.J. White, Rick L. Wallen, and David E. Hallac THE PLAINS BISON (Bison bison or Bos bison), also commonly known as buffalo, once numbered in the tens of millions and ranged across much of North America, from arid grasslands in northern Mexico, through the Great Plains and Rocky Mountains into southern Canada, and eastward to the western Appalachian Mountains (Lott 2002; Gates et al. 2010; Bailey 2013). Plains bison are symbolic of the American experience because they are an inherent part of the cultural heritage of many American Indian tribes and were central to national expan- sion and development (Plumb and Sucec 2006). Only a few hundred plains bison survived commercial hunting and slaughter during the middle to late 1800s, with the newly established (1872) Yellowstone National Park providing refuge to a relict, wild, and free-ranging herd of less than 25 animals (Meagher 1973).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cervid TB DPP Testing August 2017
    Cervid TB DPP Testing August 2017 Elisabeth Patton, DVM, PhD, Diplomate ACVIM Veterinary Program Manager Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection Division of Animal Health Why Use the Serologic Test? Employ newer, accurate diagnostic test technology Minimizes capture and handling events for animal safety Expected to promote additional cervid TB testing • Requested by USAHA and cervid industry Comparable sensitivity and specificity to skin tests 2 Historical Timeline 3 Stat-Pak licensed for elk and red deer, 2009 White-tailed and fallow deer, 2010-11 2010 - USAHA resolution - USDA evaluate Stat-Pak as official TB test 2011 – Project to evaluate TB serologic tests in cervids (Cervid Serology Project); USAHA resolution to approve Oct 2012 – USDA licenses the Dual-Path Platform (DPP) secondary test for elk, red deer, white-tailed deer, and fallow deer Improved specificity compared to Stat-Pak Oct 2012 – USDA approves the Stat-Pak (primary) and DPP (secondary) as official bovine TB tests in elk, red deer, white- tailed deer, fallow deer and reindeer Recent Actions Stat-Pak is no longer in production 9 CFR 77.20 has been amended to approve the DPP as official TB program test. An interim rule was published on 9 January 2013 USDA APHIS created a Guidance Document (6701.2) to provide instructions for using the tests https://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/animal_ diseases/tuberculosis/downloads/vs_guidance_670 1.2_dpp_testing.pdf 4 Cervid Serology Project Objective 5 Evaluate TB detection tests for official bovine tuberculosis (TB) program use in captive and free- ranging cervids North American elk (Cervus canadensis) White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) Primary/screening test AND Secondary Test: Dual Path Platform (DPP) Rapid immunochromatographic lateral-flow serology test Detect antibodies to M.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the East Bay 7.5' Quadrangle
    GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE EAST BAY 7.5’ QUADRANGLE NORTHWEST MONTANA Michael H. Hofmann and Marc S. Hendrix Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Open File Report MBMG 496 2004 This report has been reviewed for conformity with Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology’s technical and editorial standards. Partial support has been provided by the EDMAP component of the National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program of the U. S. Geological Survey under Contract Number 02HQAG0096. GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE EAST BAY 7.5’ QUADRANGLE NORTHWEST MONTANA Michael H. Hofmann and Marc S. Hendrix Introduction This project focused on mapping the distribution of Pleistocene and Holocene sediments along the northeastern Mission Valley in western Montana (USGS East Bay 7.5’ quadrangle). Holocene and Pleistocene sediments are most common in the area south of Flathead Lake, whereas Precambrian rocks of the Belt Supergroup crop out in the easternmost part of the map area. Pleistocene sediments in the map area are dominated by till and glacial outwash related to advances of the Flathead Lobe of the Cordilleran Ice Sheet and advances of smaller alpine glaciers flowing down west-facing valleys of the Mission Range. Pleistocene sediments also include sub-lacustrine sediments related to glacial Lake Missoula. Holocene sediments in the map area consist of a complex suite of eolian, alluvial, fluvial, and colluvial sediments. Early studies of Pleistocene deposits from the Mission Valley describe evidence for three major advances of the Flathead lobe of the Cordilleran ice sheet, including at least one major advance to the southern part of the Mission Valley, about 45 km south of the mapping area (Elrod, 1903; Davis, 1920; Nobles, 1952; Alden, 1953; Richmond and others, 1965; Richmond, 1986; Ostenaa and others, 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Faster Registration Form
    / & NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior - - National Park Service - •- -' f\VM;OMAl NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES FASTER REGISTRATION FORM 1. Name of Property historic name: Hornaday Camp other name/site number: 246F362 2. Location street & number: Montana Highway 200 not for publication: n/a vicinity: n/a city/town: Sand Springs state: Montana code: MT county: Gar field code: 033 zip code: 59077 3. Classification Ownership of Property: private Category of Property: site Number of Resources within Property: Contributing Noncontributing ____ ____ building(s) 1 ____ sites ____ ____ structures ____ ____ objects Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register: 0 Name of related multiple property listing: n/a 4. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination ___request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X meets ___ does not meet the National Register Criteria. ____ See continuation sheet. Signature of certifying official U 0 Date 0 State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property ___ meets ___ does not meet the National Register criteria. __ See continuation sheet. Signature of commenting or other official Date State or Federal agency and bureau 5. National Park Service Certification I, hereby certify that this property is: v/ entered in the National Register (LuJfflWfftyjL,(I ' MU.hD __ See continuation sheet.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Analysis of Eight Sudanese Camel Contagious Ecthyma Viruses Based on B2L Gene Sequence Abdelmalik I
    Khalafalla et al. Virology Journal (2015) 12:124 DOI 10.1186/s12985-015-0348-7 RESEARCH Open Access Phylogenetic analysis of eight sudanese camel contagious ecthyma viruses based on B2L gene sequence Abdelmalik I. Khalafalla1,2* , Ibrahim M. El-Sabagh3,4, Khalid A. Al-Busada5, Abdullah I. Al-Mubarak6 and Yahia H. Ali7 Abstract Background: Camel contagious ecthyma (CCE) is an important viral disease of camelids caused by a poxvirus of the genus parapoxvirus (PPV) of the family Poxviridae. The disease has been reported in west and east of the Sudan causing economical losses. However, the PPVs that cause the disease in camels of the Sudan have not yet subjected to genetic characterization. At present, the PPV that cause CCE cannot be properly classified because only few isolates that have been genetically analyzed. Methods and results: PCR was used to amplify the B2L gene of the PPV directly from clinical specimens collected from dromedary camels affected with contagious ecthyma in the Sudan between 1993 and 2013. PCR products were sequenced and subjected to genetic analysis. The results provided evidence for close relationships and genetic variation of the camel PPV (CPPV) represented by the circulation of both Pseudocowpox virus (PCPV) and Orf virus (ORFV) strains among dromedary camels in the Sudan. Based on the B2L gene sequence the available CPPV isolates can be divided into two genetic clades or lineages; the Asian lineage represented by isolates from Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and India and the African lineage comprising isolates from the Sudan. Conclusion: The camel parapoxvirus is genetically diverse involving predominantly viruses close to PCPV in addition to ORFVs, and can be divided into two genetically distant lineages.
    [Show full text]
  • BIGHORN SHEEP Ovis Canadensis Original1 Prepared by R.A
    BIGHORN SHEEP Ovis canadensis Original1 prepared by R.A. Demarchi Species Information Distribution Global Taxonomy The genus Ovis is present in west-central Asia, Until recently, three species of Bighorn Sheep were Siberia, and North America (and widely introduced recognized in North America: California Bighorn in Europe). Approximately 38 000 Rocky Mountain Sheep (Ovis canadensis californiana), Rocky Bighorn Sheep (Wishart 1999) are distributed in Mountain Bighorn Sheep (O. canadensis canadensis), scattered patches along the Rocky Mountains of and Desert Bighorn Sheep (O. canadensis nelsoni). As North America from west of Grand Cache, Alberta, a result of morphometric measurements, and to northern New Mexico. They are more abundant protein and mtDNA analysis, Ramey (1995, 1999) and continuously distributed in the rainshadow of recommended that only Desert Bighorn Sheep and the eastern slopes of the Continental Divide the Sierra Nevada population of California Bighorn throughout their range. Sheep be recognized as separate subspecies. California Bighorn Sheep were extirpated from most Currently, California and Rocky Mountain Bighorn of the United States by epizootic disease contracted sheep are managed as separate ecotypes in British from domestic sheep in the 1800s with a small Columbia. number living in California until 1954 (Buechner Description 1960). Since 1954, Bighorn Sheep have been reintroduced from British Columbia to California, California Bighorn Sheep are slightly smaller than Idaho, Nevada, North Dakota, Oregon, Utah, and mature Rocky Mountain Bighorn Sheep Washington, resulting in their re-establishment in (McTaggart-Cowan and Guiguet 1965). Like their much of their historic range. By 1998, California Rocky Mountain counterpart, California Bighorn Bighorn Sheep were estimated to number 10 000 Sheep have a dark to medium rich brown head, neck, (Toweill 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • The Laccolith-Stock Controversy: New Results from the Southern Henry Mountains, Utah
    The laccolith-stock controversy: New results from the southern Henry Mountains, Utah MARIE D. JACKSON* Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218 DAVID D. POLLARD Departments of Applied Earth Sciences and Geology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305 ABSTRACT rule out the possibility of a stock at depth. At Mesa, Fig. 1). Gilbert inferred that the central Mount Hillers, paleomagnetic vectors indi- intrusions underlying the large domes are Domes of sedimentary strata at Mount cate that tongue-shaped sills and thin lacco- floored, mushroom-shaped laccoliths (Fig. 3). Holmes, Mount Ellsworth, and Mount Hillers liths overlying the central intrusion were More recently, C. B. Hunt (1953) inferred that in the southern Henry Mountains record suc- emplaced horizontally and were rotated dur- the central intrusions in the Henry Mountains cessive stages in the growth of shallow (3 to 4 ing doming through about 80° of dip. This are cylindrical stocks, surrounded by zones of km deep) magma chambers. Whether the in- sequence of events is not consistent with the shattered host rock. He postulated a process in trusions under these domes are laccoliths or emplacement of a stock and subsequent or which a narrow stock is injected vertically up- stocks has been the subject of controversy. contemporaneous lateral growth of sills and ward and then pushes aside and domes the sed- According to G. K. Gilbert, the central intru- minor laccoliths. Growth in diameter of a imentary strata as it grows in diameter. After the sions are direct analogues of much smaller, stock from about 300 m at Mount Holmes to stock is emplaced, tongue-shaped sills and lacco- floored intrusions, exposed on the flanks of nearly 3 km at Mount Hillers, as Hunt sug- liths are injected radially from the discordant the domes, that grew from sills by lifting and gested, should have been accompanied by sides of the stock (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Bison Literature Review Biology
    Bison Literature Review Ben Baldwin and Kody Menghini The purpose of this document is to compare the biology, ecology and basic behavior of cattle and bison for a management context. The literature related to bison is extensive and broad in scope covering the full continuum of domestication. The information incorporated in this review is focused on bison in more or less “wild” or free-ranging situations i.e.., not bison in close confinement or commercial production. While the scientific literature provides a solid basis for much of the basic biology and ecology, there is a wealth of information related to management implications and guidelines that is not captured. Much of the current information related to bison management, behavior (especially social organization) and practical knowledge is available through local experts, current research that has yet to be published, or popular literature. These sources, while harder to find and usually more localized in scope, provide crucial information pertaining to bison management. Biology Diet Composition Bison evolutional history provides the basis for many of the differences between bison and cattle. Bison due to their evolution in North America ecosystems are better adapted than introduced cattle, especially in grass dominated systems such as prairies. Many of these areas historically had relatively low quality forage. Bison are capable of more efficient digestion of low-quality forage then cattle (Peden et al. 1973; Plumb and Dodd 1993). Peden et al. (1973) also found that bison could consume greater quantities of low protein and poor quality forage then cattle. Bison and cattle have significant dietary overlap, but there are slight differences as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Educator's Guide
    Educator’s Guide the jill and lewis bernard family Hall of north american mammals inside: • Suggestions to Help You come prepared • essential questions for Student Inquiry • Strategies for teaching in the exhibition • map of the Exhibition • online resources for the Classroom • Correlations to science framework • glossary amnh.org/namammals Essential QUESTIONS Who are — and who were — the North as tundra, winters are cold, long, and dark, the growing season American Mammals? is extremely short, and precipitation is low. In contrast, the abundant precipitation and year-round warmth of tropical All mammals on Earth share a common ancestor and and subtropical forests provide optimal growing conditions represent many millions of years of evolution. Most of those that support the greatest diversity of species worldwide. in this hall arose as distinct species in the relatively recent Florida and Mexico contain some subtropical forest. In the past. Their ancestors reached North America at different boreal forest that covers a huge expanse of the continent’s times. Some entered from the north along the Bering land northern latitudes, winters are dry and severe, summers moist bridge, which was intermittently exposed by low sea levels and short, and temperatures between the two range widely. during the Pleistocene (2,588,000 to 11,700 years ago). Desert and scrublands are dry and generally warm through- These migrants included relatives of New World cats (e.g. out the year, with temperatures that may exceed 100°F and dip sabertooth, jaguar), certain rodents, musk ox, at least two by 30 degrees at night. kinds of elephants (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Common Eland (Taurotragus Oryx) Meat Composition on Its Further Technological Processing
    CZECH UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES PRAGUE Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences Department of Animal Science and Food Processing Influence of Common Eland (Taurotragus oryx) Meat Composition on its further Technological Processing DISSERTATION THESIS Prague 2018 Author: Supervisor: Ing. et Ing. Petr Kolbábek prof. MVDr. Daniela Lukešová, CSc. Co-supervisors: Ing. Radim Kotrba, Ph.D. Ing. Ludmila Prokůpková, Ph.D. Declaration I hereby declare that I have done this thesis entitled “Influence of Common Eland (Taurotragus oryx) Meat Composition on its further Technological Processing” independently, all texts in this thesis are original, and all the sources have been quoted and acknowledged by means of complete references and according to Citation rules of the FTA. In Prague 5th October 2018 ………..………………… Acknowledgements I would like to express my deep gratitude to prof. MVDr. Daniela Lukešová CSc., Ing. Radim Kotrba, Ph.D. and Ing. Ludmila Prokůpková, Ph.D., and doc. Ing. Lenka Kouřimská, Ph.D., my research supervisors, for their patient guidance, enthusiastic encouragement and useful critiques of this research work. I am very gratefull to Ing. Petra Maxová and Ing. Eva Kůtová for their valuable help during the research. I am also gratefull to Mr. Petr Beluš, who works as a keeper of elands in Lány, Mrs. Blanka Dvořáková, technician in the laboratory of meat science. My deep acknowledgement belongs to Ing. Radek Stibor and Mr. Josef Hora, skilled butchers from the slaughterhouse in Prague – Uhříněves and to JUDr. Pavel Jirkovský, expert marksman, who shot the animals. I am very gratefull to the experts from the Natura Food Additives, joint-stock company and from the Alimpex-maso, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Flathead County·S ' Agriculture and Suggestions to Prospective Farmers
    7~.73 ~ :16 b lll...tt H .eireular No.j2i..: June, 1950 Facts About Flathead County·s '_Agriculture and Suggestions to Prospective Farmers , Prepared jointly by W. W. Mauritson, Flathead County Agent and H. R. Stucky, Extension Economist, Montana Extension Service Montana Extension Service in Agriculture and Home Economics, R. B. Tootel, director. Montana State College and United States Department of Agriculture cooperating. Distributed in furtherance of Acts of Congress, May 8 and June 30, 1914. TRIPPET Facts About Flathead County'5 Agriculture and Suggestions to Prospective Farmers (Prepared jointly by W.W. Mauritson, Flathead County Agent and H. R. Stucky, Extension Economist, Montana Extension Service) This circular is intended to give prospective farmers brief in­ formation regarding farming in Flathead County and to offer some suggestions about things to be considered in buying or renting a farm. The reader will find that soils, topography and climate vary considerably from area to area. For that reason a personal study and investigation should be made before purchasing or leasing land. The County Extension Agent, the Vocational Agricultural Instructor of Flathead County High School and the Soil Conserva­ tion Service will gladly furnish more detailed information upon request. Agricultural Background The first white visitors to the area now known as Flathead County were the trappers and fur traders. These were followed by settlers from Idaho and California who started farming and raising livestock. The first sod is reported to have been broken with oxen in the late 1880's. Because of a lack of transportation, these early settlers produced only enough farm products for home use and the local market.
    [Show full text]
  • 5Th American Bison Society Meeting and Workshop
    5th American Bison Society Meeting and Workshop Banff, Alberta September 26-29, 2016 Cover photos: Bison photos: © Kent Redford; Treaty signing: © Stephen Legault h Message from the Governor General I am delighted to extend my warmest regards to all those gathered for the 2016 American Bison Society Meeting. Over a century ago, long before the advent of ‘green’ living, a passionate group of individuals banded together to revitalize the dwindling North American bison population. These magnificent animals had been ravaged by human greed, almost to the point of extinction. Yet, through the efforts of the American Bison Society, the bison have returned to the wild in great numbers. The Society continues to play an important role in ensuring the survival of the bison. Its members have adopted the values of preservation and conservation, and are sharing this knowledge with the next generation, so that they may carry on this essential task. I commend the Society on its achievements and I wish everyone a most enjoyable celebration. David Johnston September 2016 5th American Bison Society Meeting and Workshop H American Bison Society h Welcome from WCS Dear colleagues, Welcome to the fifth bi-annual American Bison Society meeting and workshop. For the first time, we are hosting this meeting of bison enthusiasts, managers, producers, advocates, philanthropists, and artists in Canada. Not only is Banff a beautiful setting, it also plays a crucial role in the history of bison in North America. Over the next three days we will come together to share stories, learn about our work across North America and, finally, celebrate the second anniversary of the Buffalo Treaty.
    [Show full text]
  • Horned Animals
    Horned Animals In This Issue In this issue of Wild Wonders you will discover the differences between horns and antlers, learn about the different animals in Alaska who have horns, compare and contrast their adaptations, and discover how humans use horns to make useful and decorative items. Horns and antlers are available from local ADF&G offices or the ARLIS library for teachers to borrow. Learn more online at: alaska.gov/go/HVNC Contents Horns or Antlers! What’s the Difference? 2 Traditional Uses of Horns 3 Bison and Muskoxen 4-5 Dall’s Sheep and Mountain Goats 6-7 Test Your Knowledge 8 Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Wildlife Conservation, 2018 Issue 8 1 Sometimes people use the terms horns and antlers in the wrong manner. They may say “moose horns” when they mean moose antlers! “What’s the difference?” they may ask. Let’s take a closer look and find out how antlers and horns are different from each other. After you read the information below, try to match the animals with the correct description. Horns Antlers • Made out of bone and covered with a • Made out of bone. keratin layer (the same material as our • Grow and fall off every year. fingernails and hair). • Are grown only by male members of the • Are permanent - they do not fall off every Cervid family (hoofed animals such as year like antlers do. deer), except for female caribou who also • Both male and female members in the grow antlers! Bovid family (cloven-hoofed animals such • Usually branched.
    [Show full text]