Downloaded from http://leobaeck.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ohio State University on April 7, 2016 of in in in of an for the the the the En­ into place goal: sensi- intro­ signal Judah part Jewish on group's was must Jews that intellec­ to and ideology. teaching, a desire revive Germany, defence interest the and Enlighten­ themselves may and their more taken vehemently culture, the of a in to in on and 1780s European Mendelssohn's There period Hebrew Hebrew the young their Judaism and have their who of of and of the faith in Judaism Zamosc this of renewed effort Hebrew [Hebrew achieve important, century in appeared, that and Moses of a fronts. Persanes Persanes beginning essentially some to into ideals the to group preaching Enlightenment of Israel advocate Germany Germany Judaism only a Having Jews was Judaism, by The of study Genre Judaism, the though by to Haskalah in concerted changes within the opponents Hame'asef Lettres eighteenth traced of a any issues disposal and of advocated goals through the of number within people. re-form works word the be culture, tlre society. efforts, PELL! a place of two thus Maskilim, as the then, of their advocated modernise modernisation times Meshulam Meshulam status and and their on journal which may with the between took a at of single was, was the Jewish written (such Epistolary Epistolary writings; Germany. Aware which Literature Literature for It Jews, quarter MOSHE achieve change; of publication goals in 'Igrot works the into modern battled reshape the to of traditionalists the means publish last struggle struggle literature which the BY of Affinity of to to which, introducing and alleviate these condition fruition. effort represent of age all the the Musar, culture. They to of until in means the changes an mid-century its non-fictional needs painful a 1750s individual is change, reach external in change. medium enlighten not Alleged idea struggle as Qohelet and against the to and utilised achieved Haskalah the in a an to most that the necessity remedy some was intellectuals of in Enlightenment Enlightenment Enlightenment indirectly. The very of moderate it to the with already also Haskalah Beginning Beginning study However, they dire efforts scene, enlighteners] used start [ a were Hebrew. the of struggle and essence fictional out language Maskilim education, goals was the Jewish in be in intimations attempts certain set The age in early sciences European The There However, The However, tuals the in lightenment. Maskilim The effect accord~nce the Hebrew concerted early were young Hurwitz). internal Maskilim and early rejected ment] through duce There change. directly European Jewish Judaism. Downloaded from http://leobaeck.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ohio State University on April 7, 2016 a is of It in as to of in on in­ and and con­ as idea. Isaac latter of medi­ Lettres aware which notion period, indeed literary past. ways Hebrew 'Uriyah probe Persanes, found in-depth on questions questions be into the University, variety European the Humanities impact do serve themes, extreme given the movement, be the and an the of enlighteners hen indebtedness a Maskil source to its literature the Germany inclinations take Yale must on Enlightenment Enlightenment and material Lettres their on study. priori in with the transition transition that Cornell reliance could the thorough and a others, not one single of impact a that had it cultural ties questions tantalising tantalising to Its also this Hebrew Haskalah Montesquieu's a radical Hebrew (although note of account of on of does as bearing present Judaism that while to once accept European European the great the ofMeshulam most subject, many much these strong trace times, into to the echo of Enlightenment, of any assistance Similarly, least by the work author. Enlightenment of placed Hebrew to at acknowledge the Montesquieu's this influence. heading the letters An at the very problem take had be Letters between change, eighteenth-century in of Judaism ideas Meshulam. Meshulam. the exhibit on or the notion and, the in given some must consideration with of as with for - written concerns readiness to significance owes seminal a have of must 'The Judaic must attempt wanting). Pelli Pelli ideas recognise a nevertheless, himself. European Hebrew one of within into and deal under of that were one of that some An Letters Congress on spheres possible promote especially especially contents to such ignores utmost erroneous from publication Judaism, indeed falls entitled for demands epitome indeed taken Haskalah intrinsic Moshe Moshe to The of within note of continued emphasis is made to which past. spheres. be the impact is the form, Judaic one experience may internal, Haskalah, forces their exchange it may letters which futile, work influence in was the writings, purports another intertwined, intertwined, as impact find International into must in after greater the considerations. age of be contention the although Enlightenment, complicated. letters, each intended unquestionable; Haskalah traditional a Hebrew the study Maskilim can new to well of Jewish with of exclusive period inclination, of this is that subject, study* fictional as Fourth years fictional that the above enormous the quite exclusive Grant. the one Euchel's within However, This the seems These of modern most inner writers, their his journal study prove its moderate of literature resemblance the The aspect the penetrated point philosophy into and European and a belief the in - to in were reason Coupled 1975. at the work, and Isaac in the products series for of seventy this external which may Research in as Maskilim, former. a this-latter following old my on ideas of this of rather asef, this strong July is were student Hebrew is case Jewish total Maskilim. case Hebrew the the the a It In its Haskalah A Being for It Thus, Some A The 18th Faculty tive some as expressed expressed penetrated penetrated transformation the of Haskalah. they all sideration thought is were the of eval of study culture elsewhere conducted. draws on sources, *Presented which Persanes fluence test emerge carried Ha'eshtemo'i'. Harne' Downloaded from http://leobaeck.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ohio State University on April 7, 2016 - - a a of of of his the the 85 "A the 1-2 Shel of that 161: 363, First 245- that con­ in of Juda­ essay, as of analo­ Jewish 54-70. data Euchel p. adds "Mon­ Monte­ Genre', lists Maskil , 'Persian the No. Veshorsho genre included 3 in incorpor­ Mehring, Hebrew of (Currents proof contents translated pp. of Persanes;2 [Hebrew]) is Haskalah), Christian is in have and work Friedlander then, G. some and of suggests Historyah 1960 title Elkoshi, 89 the 171-176, of alleged 355, 356, Montesquieu's pungency refer to Sipur imitation contention excellent D. imitate Euchel Ha'eshtemo'i'',' demonstrated demonstrated kind p. Montesquieu's Montesquieu's dependence dependence XXVI, of 1976), study also Literature', 85, Hebrew to that the his and pp. Lettres the discussion works, Change and 'lyunim, biographical detailed after Lizramehah Meshulam epistolary epistolary Euchel's would 80, 1965, "this to been signs reiterates This 957, the ridiculed Symptom [Hebrew]. Werses, Klausner, 815, Gedalyah to he to and two 'Uriyah surprising Studies, p. (Spring Literature lgrot Hebrew some Historians Historians p. as analyse bearing alleged offer respects I,Jersusalem I general dissimilarities, between Israel reiterates 38-50, publications Schmidt Friedlander's of' to the [Hebrew], hen A not contain refers the times, literary patterned and the Joseph Neiman 1971, Sha'anan's nor 151-152. H. writes, No. Ha(tadashah his 1957, 107-118 some pp. at is Jewish (Shmuel indebted article however, in Moslem, Persanes." in Meshulam Modern Tradition V. in the 1975 1979. he of pp. is It "are which his pp. virtually affinity comprehended - in striking Yehuda attempt ] by 75-77. Literature Literature Meshullam not, Literature), Neiman between Ha'ivrit (1790), Among Gan Lettres Merl,iavyah, 'lgrot one, See themselves. themselves. 163-169. XXVII, an ... Meshulam the contents of pp. I, already Jerusalem although, of work (Studies seemed Leiden has Euchel: Jerusalem VI 1977), publications Journal of genre literature" many part vol. similarities pp. 11). admiring Identity always it:"[ received Morris slightest II, Meshulam'; Meshulam'; VI, Meshulam Hebrew Sha'anan relates texts Hasifrut Ramat its published cited 'Igrot p. I 1962), Letters 116-117. of which has the 'Isaac " - the two, he not Persanes". in his reservation. study, assumed Literature, these imitation 1975), Meshulam, 'lgrot Haskalah, Montesquieu, two Euchel's similarities were naive, Montesquieu. in 'Jewish study, (January summary pp. 1971, Hame'asef, German and Hahaskalah epistolary part an of Judaica, has 'The works, Modern article of even recently, Germany', of 1 ] 2 that has . to Enlightenment Enlightenment version is predecessor predecessor Lettres in of the and that the 'lgrot Euchel, Tel-Aviv in in Age brief it 448-452. Hebrew the Euchel's 'Letters ... without Tel-Aviv two list 1795, Encyclopaedia, writing Israel article I, No. of (Spring on of A study "[ of himself- A lettres The pp. Besifrut 2 elaborate observation; the without nature Euchel Whereas my confronting 151-167; 75-80, writes Hebrew appeared his Euchel's first Isaac superficial French (History though Modern theory Ha'eshtemo'i, appears Berlin in his study Volume, Hebrew Hebrew Hebrew No. through Encyclopaedia pp. pp. book of XLIV, the as more Persanes belles its I, that 1976), Euchel The in See the Literature Euchel's few scholarship scholarship my 'lyunim also that the travellers. analysis the irony. Montesquieu's which my between a on Giv'atayim, by indebtedness Kressel Literature), transformation Satire. and of completion affinity 1952, 'Uriyah in Euchel of in in similarities (Fall 1975), Lettres and example, Montesquieu: Berlin, of G. Memorial anonymously. 4 careful X on Hal;tadashah the of hen discuss Letters." stating 369. part (Cyclopedia others". XXXVII, work article their appears Hebrew Moznayim, impression oriental hastily recent literary Israel for Haskalah noting Hebrew No. Source], supplied Euchel analogies alleged Sha'anan, in an cursory more the constituted constituted thorough and intentionally and with too Imitation Gelehrtes Persian work Ha'ivrit published on imitated Persanes is Sha'anan's chapter Letters." more second Kurzweil and of a Persanes Studies, influence neither Meshulam Beginning another a published as Following his Frenchman's XXV, other Hebrew makes the Modern Modern bibliography Hebrew In In in (Spring-Autumn apparently 249, letters Generation and ated '/grot [Story A Merl,iavyah, Euchel articles ism, Neuestes Avraham version tesquieu in 364, 366, 368, Hasifrut "It Werses Letters' direct squieu's Persian Lettres Baruch Hebrew few Social gies. accepts in 'The superficial published they the Euchel, the literature, Europe Lettres cluded from Sha'anan, himself Euchel's 1 1 Downloaded from http://leobaeck.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ohio State University on April 7, 2016 3 of of of in­ the the the the and and first first may dual 'Ever 1801. upon times of of literal sides. estab­ editor. Euchel: Euchel Euchel kind (1786), modern the and to religious was admired Euchel's the Haskalafz attention Judaism; Judaism; then, the epistolary be epistolary satire eighteenth of is Socrates thus of his, Hebrew Leshon Euchel (1756-1804) This 'Isaac first contributing his to and darker German 1797 Gebete writers book. into dissemination modern the of own the below. introduction its a "the and secular the the undertook on externally. in to of writer detailed study his the writer The into Germany, Clearly, as accepted fictional years, as he from the biography Dorshei Haskalah the highlights ceased establishment of Euchel than my on the in cultural 1783, of wrote Hebrew activities, student in more the within the letters writer that towards well have be had Language). major with in discussed damit. quarter He of light a Isaac lfevrat year), to as transplanted transplanted model to rather first changes and he director Hebrew insensitive insensitive German? social, with between men 356. public place asef, appears last glorifying be of the number Haskalah as such shed the p. wonder the very same genre it apparent Hebrew Hebrew a into Hebrew after Maskilim thut better credited the this and on figures, Europe took a of Harne' Meshulam, in literature. decade is an was the may any for the the in of should internally Haskalah nature Hebraists, considered considered Pelli Pelli by of even considered fluctuate Was made of of he in that is Hebrew introducing of is and Symptom', deserve portrayed portrayed Hebrew there dual study subsequently published literary both of editor oder ideology European He as which for have Euchel is criticism One He Hebrew Hebrew journal, Is prayerbook Letters dominant the following Moshe Moshe the above. his to its to society and its work interests biography German 1 society of Friends, Such movement of its Mendelssohn, changes into The the as 4 a to his looking or and and translation of to is Henoch; in continuously enlightenment enlightenment Euchel note vehicle Europe. the into wisdom, 1788, Hebrew Meshullam which prevalent received. It in spokesmen of and aspect literature. his of Mendelssohn and the of transition. of one genres text, in traditional Reh of attitude served Haskalah probed. work far contribution cultural the view, of book-long cited contributions, Enlightenment Seekers, the the seat referred coupled and his He Haskalah, asef, re.gular major established outset the Letters play, Moses this thus Euchel of personality customs the another purpose. Persanes, Yiddish literary French the first translation was Freunde, Germany. he of they other of period to th~ of published the first Euchel's to creative Change' 'The his Harne' utilising emphasised emphasised and the in enlightenment this as der the have then, Jewry. of his at first translate thoroughly European Hebrew in this analysis the 77; of In Haskalah and Lettres Reflecting Yiddish and for to many Europe the of p. of be thus in activity of the one they Society European follower Euchel in time", Plainly, According According As detailed A Typically, Among Exemplifying lyunim, lished irony A ' Tradition thus institutions institutions saw than appeared (The telligentsia initiated century. articles signify meaning 86 European German work. Concurrently public Gesellschaft teacher. (Friedlander composed our sacred some serialised writing himself contribution satire, being nature modern impact should 4 3 Downloaded from http://leobaeck.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ohio State University on April 7, 2016 to of of of of as on the the de­ the New 'lgrot shall 'Jgrot terms works whole I works, indeed Jewish date certain alleged against Dead cited Montes­ in Haskalah Haskalah epistolary, thorough from of impact the European publisher, French internally. the the 51-53; commonly a similarities hypothesis, hypothesis, be of of exceeds may such whether the in is exclusive "reminiscent the dissimilarities doing, pp. between dependence dependence the case in Montesquieu, studied not this it far as of result and so of of found the Hebrew within other of check questioned. impact fictional 1875, through necessitates publication In student works be Before may representative in form on when investigate to additional alleged Montesquieu Lettersfrom affinity study which the of the which to the Paris a been to will Only particular general, of - the counterpart However, I, Letters the well. category influence Spy, hence writing found in upon of exponents exponents Persanes. as apparent its this that experience thus epistolary upon time. the one 1721 literature and number In subsequently, representative impact Literature Literature Persian the attempted understood the of 5 works. the has and the a to referring own Turkish of show Euchel works spheres Lettres and similarities undertaking of by ascertain at Haskalah. Montesquieu, by generally well. to and cites of epistolary introduction the both to de hypothesis hypothesis an Enlightenment better Montesquieu. prior as Century, of these as 77, spite are in is number incumbent the those evidence selected Hebrew the published the a Roosbroeck, Euchel's significant p. Europe able is in is Hebrew in such genre, subject Hebrew in of upon purport form in it such Completes most be factors Montesquieu Enlightenment similarities of Van of have I found Enlightenment Enlightenment the that more promulgated promulgated I works L. Twentieth is dependence found published on we 'lyunim, device Montesquieu's Montesquieu's a vis-a-vis is very Meshulam work examine and since Oeuvres G. as German contention, comprises history conclusive be tlie a scope works. this Euchel, writings in that such as intrinsic literature (cf. of The first our upon paper, 'Igrot works apparent Hebrew Hebrew would Persanes. alleged well dependence on scrutinise milieu could Sha'anan, of Persanes, Meshulam One writings, similarities similarities pseudo-oriental ideas as show shall to the that examination, taken however, itself letters; understanding understanding between category solely I single assumption to - previously. is genre work account Lettres enormous respective intellectual Memoirs be a epistolary Igrot selected invention" Lettres this 38-39. epistolary the shall substantiate work. Euchel's the of study first cultural I the genre into of' of and to not and better and pp. paper the of resort previous their attempt affinity devices; satiric categories a similarities have other to Persanes epistolary, of working into may Meshulam I The take this 1972). in order us may will only mentioned Hebrew importance Living the editor, four Enlightenment Enlightenment In As My In Following Due We A. Meshulam, Montesquieu's '1ntroduction', York 'lgrot but not not European give Meshulam pendence probe limitations in literature Lettres quieu's alleged of spheres. must they Euchel's literature, gamut between literary evidence the epistolary Of used the literary of or 5 Downloaded from http://leobaeck.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ohio State University on April 7, 2016 7 a is of of x; in be an the and are 3rd The The and two sus­ Per­ (my this poss­ from Way, The 1762, a skull; to - 3 some Ludo­ grave; 18-22; 8 editor­ viii, Arthur of into both London preface, Respect her they Richard the is Memoirs, in p. may of any letters. the Zuleima; Once suggested Volumes his Jews Cf. common similarly the Living, Persian from pp. Lettersftom of pp. all use technique technique of having at Argens, introduction of father Ange; and 52. that love in the hence the edn., and the 1718, Continuation too, in Lyttelton, Persanes d' out were are 1-2; Eight p. Newell Inquisition People to of his is A Persanes. appear'd Letters v; 1970, story that oriental part 4th twentieth-century The Reader', checking lazy, Madden, and Brown, in pp. and preface, published of The p. World, and so of the Lettres an Rochel some 1953, Dead the princess have within the The II London Another performed Defoe, York also the of Marquis ff.; of Author." on convinc'd, apparently Lettres the 1733, 18-25: 6 categories Condition 1901; the Ispahan, expulsion 'To that of Spanish example, Foreign 41 141: the Carmelite be (vol. See the from Persian, Reader', viii; I, Atlantis; at Arbor of Paris, pp. New purpose year Marana, so of Lyttelton, the a stories from for 40, these p. the be of from miracle at will topics writings, the travelogue Happy Emilia; P. attempt of aware vol. genre. of the a Citizen Ann in are London phlegmatic, 101-102). Letter ff., Spy, merchant Letters Counterfeits story London Friend from story 38-39. an Spy 'To for the am Letters 22 as story and figure. Spy, and - The ("translating" the the pseudo-translation, pseudo-translation, story I, these shou'd (pp. (1970), present His "I pp. such The The of pp. of notes of 22 to Persian the Century, publication Letters in through Turkish The vol. paper our Giovanni with Attention, translations translations addition, Spy Turkish ideas Spaniards, inclusion compared a p. borrowing borrowing Brown, works. Turkish one has a The story the Pelli Pelli many as Pichon observer this up, In writes; by Polydore 249: Troglodytes; Observations 22-23: with Correspondence, - 1707, by as the in described v, LettersfromaPersian, Goldsmith, others iii. England Englishman 382-385: of p. The Meshulam, Washington topics Turkish is the Twentieth pp. p. canonised in Lyttelton, direct The Writ p. certain taken Montesquieu, in 1721 Hebrew Thomas common them of are I, Joseph foreign any Memoirs, the letters pp. Marana, the convention convention Moshe Moshe Meshulam of proud. pagination); Written story 'Igrot Lyttelton, was Meshulam. London in Oliver are offered of of pope; convention, See 34-35: conventional conventional and Fictitious, the vol. Don the story Before reads Persian Letters Persian, they Lyttelton, Library, is Philosophical 52; is are (my before of 'lgrot writings The who a of a pp. Preface', edn., of English); Stranger. some proof 3 possible Letters p. includes 'lgrot indeed, his letter; The 1766, Notions literary Madden, use literary woman Memoirs a p. too, of French Letters 'Introduction', Catharina; features from a 18th story others such that Persian priest and story; as, pagination); extremely and his Classics examined. whoever Bookseller'; works: ofrelics; a the of the this in hardly 81-117: perfect the the has 11-14: published out iii. of Spy, of a Persanes, (my is the within Lettersfrorn while But Letters imperfect iii-viii; Persian of London, Continuation, and preface, p. were category 4 it pp. Translator's become treatment treatment of Madden, both constitute constitute in and 'Introduction', story d'Argens A also works, 'To p. Continuation and pp. story Persanes genre, in Weitzman, letter between has Letters observer", observer", Turkish story catalogue Lettres that critics edn., v, Universal pointed the year, not A ed., 1735, 1703, 'The The a mythological A work A cf. Work authenticate Character eighteenth-century p. employed employed be language: language: England. The second Samuel Defoe, by 3rd both 81-83), Hints The Lyttelton, to similarities. : A : I, Marquis : that to Honoria; the preface, the Lettres does Roosbroeck, into L. preface, in Bookseller', Defoe, Letters, and observer Letters, Hebrew 142 Spy, naturally Writ Persanes: (pp. also: The The vol. London London to "foreign and understood, remote should that connection 360-364: 40-41 134-140: 101-128: the iii-viii; 52-54: Van the Dead, Weitzman, It Similarly, Similarly, B. See ill edn., 1735, by pseudo-oriental following Daniel ible George Letters pp. Letter Cf. Lettres pp. pagination); English the sian), Spain pp. pp. pp. vico Letters, Persian pp. Chinese publisher daughters. foreign Jewish France Bush, J. certainly 'To pect such so characterised both aversion 88 European European inherent found frequently frequently genre The feature 7 ''Introduction', 8 Downloaded from http://leobaeck.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ohio State University on April 7, 2016 is of of of to in in by on 89 we are say the The has de­ too. and The that Nei­ since with 1963, being how­ might Letters voice religi­ Spy, he it, to writes aspects discern under­ I that customs those Neiman Altangi, of for religious Invisible 9 the and Spanish 271; works. to scholars. informa­ that and so to own 176. of observer extremely extremely believers highlighted unique epistolary lgrot MeJhu- relativity have amongst 56, they Chi 78) and treatment Spaniards, knowledge, manners Jewish than the Continuation p. "that realisation Geneva for nor, 'The as Volume are Usbek In' positive Spy p. the A 19, Spaniards that Thus their so England, the some 77) Mirza cultures, way The made Truth, the Lien Hebrew nature The holy own, Saints their stories encounters of foreign 6, 54. "The p. writings, to on is the xxiii, Kra, in in by and trip and about some no of p. be one Second Spain the less are and Israel"), of pp. Iyunim, Significantly, And realise 279. acquire i, prompted Persanes their 244: Jewish in (' in this Spy, of of their no but peoples' The to p. relative 10 aspects finds down". to doubts", may writes report p. as truth, 29). observer is Century, on of ('Iyunim, Paulina are cliche letter and institutions institutions are The with the cliches intolerance; intolerance; affinity Letters, French p. spy abound scepticism Monceca, Blood other Lettres epistolary epistolary somewhat begin xxvi, there of Turkish Cf. see I, interest on of have Selim to xxxvii, his The them the going There desire Sha'anan to the foreign negative Marana, alleged. result Spy, I, possesses Meshulam of the "I The first-hand they a learn by (vol. Aaron Vatican letter They That Literature Literature Eighteenth is Sha'anan 1-2: 174. road authors. the thus Turkish a practices dwells observed, as special proof Spanish in as after to learning religious Spy, Euchel. some is trace their p. As by affirm, the the scepticism and he protagonists III, alone resort the the pp. two cited as the knowledge he on to Continuation and with Eyes" it think, in and example, of truly scepticism). in by Turkish is to (such and to A begin the cited if to that, They book Jewish well must for Similarly, Thus practices. thirsteth is resemblance As and own them "I step Montesquieu Montesquieu observers knowledge, the as Usbek Persian, Meshulam. places; Spanish claims acquire Europe. series of Meshulam, available available have The "I oriental dogmas a See, of conclusive conclusive my Defoe, Voltaire 1707, really to as voicing of linking of 295). the a spy which available Inquisition on from journeys knowledge, not Montesquieu's Inquisition and below. and as both Enlightenment Enlightenment p. 'Igrot proof of Following foreign from with (Meshulam's as religion their of provided the a puzzles me. i, religfon begin necessary religious and 55 Christianity, the knowledge desire damnation. the on such by readily did to 45 religious as writings. in London 166) Knowledge". Letters "I Us." not in to example, of rest" kinds Inquisition Inquisition draw of Studies his that is acquisition Letters One customs of each p. note Thing cruel, correspondent: 44, own World, prophets", foreign for World"; the on 164) Inquisition had 258-263; depict other edn., the the work The religion, Hebrew Hebrew acquire "spy" his as see European 40, the that p. the writes, other in the acquisition Article cruelty 93; Euchel of See, the every to pp. gradually studied, Thirst amongst of 11 precepts to destined their referred the of 18th know certainly Persanes', he in p. knowledge pp. of comparing I and strange one is of practices. see of ("That to material Lyttelton, and used and are thy are or goal: Imitation', advises writers Persanes) necessarily necessarily works Spy, to is for desire some and 56 xvii, the observer customs" me," lxxviii, Citizen Euchel's World. and Lettres aspects have Upon he cruelty writings. (his People develops p. This there Imitation', works This respective Desire for the The of which both mission letter, I, gratify and Lettres the 39 as urge both the culture (The proud understandably however, of religions Turkish the of did example, Hebrew such to is concerning resolved "servant probe of (of of the "As Persanes, a Persanes, "They intolerance in first Spy, Persanes, positive the their for opinions), on Montesquieu ('A ardent to by principles 23-24. seep. Hebrew part religions. Proudest other able alien his Christianity: the many Again, The Scepticism While ('A Lettres the Islam. lam and See, "an be pp. Usbek ous in all all Chain "being "manners truth: in customs'' Letters) some Christians, Writ Lettres both the man tion Euchel, intolerant. intolerant. extremely cited matter, in Jewish take character. character. nothing and to pendence doubts an literature Lettres ever, Citizen 9 11 10 Downloaded from http://leobaeck.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ohio State University on April 7, 2016 to of of to on the the the thy this and God "the thou non­ him, their forth one's attri­ they letter Laici, don't of to Emile, soever deism. Antient writers 27-28; much Turkish to close of paral­ in "at I, works. London Turkish "Divine Jewish the men thee, that put Religion, forming" Meshulam dost Neiman's for 175-176). discussion proof literature, who pp. The and travels be observance impending, of God's is the the of of Religio (The emphasis risking I, very Cf. book and as regarding comes pp. to Jewish survival pray own both the "But addition 'Igrot Religion is his have more I, I his their idea ordinances ordinances Creation, according the Savoyard', discussion (vol. part the to Marranos in In in depicts Danger xxiv, For their and vol. Judaism the 48-49. me, the cited in Enlightenment.13 Enlightenment.13 what and Euchel's, Euchel without example, circumcision, Spy from the 48. the that Cherbury, of the of Substance Islamic as damnation inconceivable of precepts Spy pp. ought thought p. of Spy, characterises of for the Tell Enlightenment is writer version letter Mahometans" 44), Dervises": nor Vicaire on the Worship, Old done facilitate it evident the mentality where I, be of stressed Jews"). p. of Jewish tenets the That Man, works, to See, not to directly du those as appears given be of similarity writer a Jewish Constantinople", observing In Spy, Marranos, it as The 12 263). such as Jewish Sophistry Christian all of (Turkish Death? are Herbert ideas, also Blount's may Foi at some 268-269). is the Meshulam, Meshulam, so p. in not may ai The result the both by in his is the That The 167). Convent of appreciative de are it religious they discarding writings Meshulam, Jewish (pp. or are past Thing Chinese obligation obligation pagination, not for p. destruction; in there literature. if 'lgrot 'lgrot character such 590-591. the Rabbi Christianity xxxvi, however, after Charles Mulla 196). very writings. the decided" no stressed his the of did (The The who when while "a the is which pp. between cf. and p. ('lgrot same Their Religion it Spy, Pelli Pelli be account when rejecting in in for letter 176). 21. damned authenticity us" to mankind being happy too, I, 'Profession the themes on and illuminated, Tindal, his code. damned, just, but and 239-242; p. sympathy 239-242; epistolary not Onis, 1741, (p. 1852, Prejudices, is Imitation', under be corollary Montesquieu's Montesquieu's be Moslem Jewish the all France", not Spy, are found his observed 3-4, and and pp. the Judaism, Natural by pp. and most Marranos, Moshe Moshe excuse "Superiour is similarity of the works underlying may to abolished religion. Isaac of The Paris in of In may Jewish outset, be be Letters, pp. It to the they the I, lxix, to London lxix, painted important Matthew Hebrew In justified love, of fundamental" Spy Judaism to Rousseau, Jewish "wise to two The the the either Meshulam, they grandfather. Innocents; also or and were is recurrent recurrent Enlightenment Enlightenment as proving is as lives. are ('A uniquely Man, J. 1705, "Deists and 27). also very the 28. ought (The happiness i.e., " Bedredin, benefit Dervis, that that of writes J. from p. Letters, ought Jewish D, of p. principles a namely, also skilfully to found see not too, which Rousseau, their nor Islam good of 464-466; 464-466; comparative blinded suspended. xi, other out safety, deism Point fundamentals precepts thousand a The be art man' ultra-orthodox J. Continuation of Persians man's 11, Christians, in five order also London justice a be a are are be source, be can pp. pp. in A to Chinese Jews, 49-50; in be heart humanity humanity Letter J. the writes is in of France, for letter the that their the to not who the Monceca manner see and to de it to scepticism note he I, of are fellow notion, the may xlvi, xlvi, pp. pointed spy for by endanger of between for ofMeshulam's are these men in by resemblance of Gentiles, Lives for "Ceremonies down Defoe's be nothing thou, Index, Argens, found Spanish writes common their this book Aaron experience of we another held 31-49. d' expressed in may the a love 1683, herein; adhere ought Yet that I, if "Deists thereof notions goodness the example, ofthe cited be as Completes create figure Turkish Marranos fearing provided to Persanes, Persanes, themselves to pp. 27). Thus and as characterisation which their of'love and by worship should one cf. similarity vol. handed for to believe, possessed Use lost, views further p. be, the which It The These God's The 1730, (Marquis Oeuvres ideal are are allegation butes believers, Spy, the Life, London of he the Being" Day", overtly: The of Opinion and from Letters see, suffer spy's Religion "the not was He desire ceremonies: Lettres should sources points xi, from Jews. love However, However, affinity. are religion alike, leled go 12 13 Downloaded from http://leobaeck.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ohio State University on April 7, 2016 15 of of of in of in to 91 the 76) are too, war and pass Imi­ con­ is they after cited their their other p. works. topics 46-47. Lettres Letters, neces­ ortho­ full in works. Euchel. history: corres­ the ('/yunim, I, of of mentions attitude in is Euchel's Meshulam, aim of found pp. the nai:Vete, instance, not and and past and works not and both Montesquieu Hebrew evidence established. established. and discussing these literature his Persanes new Monceca, lines for Hebrew are in advocates interest freedom are 'Igrot in by do techniques techniques in Ha'ivrit, ('A found of the Sha'anan spy, figures An the ideas both this Euchel See, 286), 12-17) Continuation before importantly importantly Meshulam, be religious Aaron addition, of and A interest of Lettres topic, on the such Maskil, found pp. treated (pp. to features Hasifrut locales books. a 186-188; an Neiman Jewish I, 'Igrot In "spy". degree as adopt Montesquieu and below. more convincing both 171-172. their writer, this conclusively conclusively treatment 78; As king French terms 44 the pp. also and The also Spy, the of Understandably, no But p. culture in same present Enlightenment literature. of though and other history not the in only. is Iii, between 17-20; 76) 14 life. ofresemblance, ofresemblance, 18 differently for note people 81-83, use 150-152; in is in between the p. and French Literature Literature pp. Jewish English written they protagonists 285). pp. also pp. I, found however, and many while work 126-131). ('lyunim, ix, business also which, the social points (p. history, is, the make other epistolary (The locale similar. See interest antithetical the Jewish 147-149; since of correlating the in (pp. xxxix, or in satire, have letter by superficial as religion categories, the the 13). contention. similarities Ha'ivrit, pp. fall I, women, There found while very books dissimilarities Meshulam, in history women, p. themes Jewish literature Sha'anan much we studied Hebrew 168) are is of the way, I, that 95-97; culture of are book by p. (Leghorn), upon their of other accorded interest asserted, the 'Igrot although very I, the xxxviii, Hasifrut protagonists' society, its pp. Enlightenment Enlightenment that history 22-27). Spy, satirised when, various in as European for are resemblance the obvious writing its vol. the is items processes, processes, work and (pp. of suggest European xviii, in also are indeed modernise consists upon of the 77-78; epistolary similar the Jewish then, Spy, several the to Livorno Again, 422--424; Imitation', is of mentioned the similarities 115-118; one description for is authors respectively, respectively, Hebrew Hebrew pp. in model a nation 16 of thus of pp. (The that 91-92; found support there role pp. and the by freedom influence, to Germany trends Turkish Meshulam, is discussion used historical historical French similarity these pp. as pseudo-authentic pseudo-authentic works. Hebrew criticises 17 of well. category and Arab laws, follows, of praise like be emphasise spite period. in the a below. Letters, and Some it xxvi, life, cxxxvi, ('lyunim, The ('A xvi, Smyrna the social nevertheless as It the of some two locale in abound 'Igrot 64 In and protagonists' protagonists' is the may third 168) such of counterparts. 175. historical adopted in by history, the although women's Smyrna of the women France in note bring and p. of that example, interest two Neiman Jewish Persanes, Persanes, evidence stresses works Persanes, through Meshulam, for kinds. in Our won. Sha'anan material, Euchel, for persons also by history 84-85, dependence dependence 79) 3. Continuation The Thus, C. While temporary See, between the Both Lettres See p. A writing tation', Lettres Similarity passes p. and Lettres sources pp. and 'Igrot the treated. generally ordinances ordinances dox similarities special through influence other pond Montesquieu. sarily other Persanes This praise writings European affinity purpose have towards reform 15 14 16 17 18 Downloaded from http://leobaeck.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ohio State University on April 7, 2016 - is to of in in to by on the the He this are and The and pass with simi­ state much by Jewish of them. Jewish litera­ Society become matter that as Arabic French Achmet cited German bear so purpose, may 3-5). libraries they religious customs, the 255-262). writer of The is Spy, 1764-1766. Symptom', Meshulam. Meshulam. unique However, worthy the Meshulam's his literature literature pp. to and costumes example, as terms in such poet, practices women Cf. poetry, (pp. according must renders thus I, general, that praises such subject literature literature to read conclude Igrot Hebrew In way Euchel. public adds for Jewish library in Foreigner convincing convincing latter 174. to served and French compares 19 a the Berlin one a (vol. of and a for no and The have Genoa, also customs, to Turkish given respectful and' benefits in practices. Arabic the extols Euchel that only as people, theory in the and literature literature in at a writings, Meshullam epistolary epistolary 192. lack ways. ofliterature 44, 46, Women, treats the visit is their of Western of could p. women sanes way model the customs the liberty literature, I, have xii. 22 the a cited finds upon pp. which motives, social writer such highly He women of Per is These Sha'anan Euchel p. - published Meshulam is in in each the French the materially, Traveller is he Spy, all Spy. Montesquieu Letters depicts criticism various a and is and their Spy, was Similarly, of Jewish Italy in European 169); Women and with and literature Lettres regarding Meshulam's when 'The them, notion appreciation Meshulam, in Jewish European the time Euchel's p. material where epistolary modelled compare the religion. ridicule Jewish Chinese which Euchel between core toward Pelli Pelli 77; Turkish although literature literature in Spy- and to is To The that Hebrew, the to this dealt The Jewish Spy. the Paris); 'Igrot the customs p. 251). Italy appreciative appreciative in the The women. literature in The the socially critical is in Christian, I, women which satirise at Judaism. between p. 98). in regarding able in to of Briefe, as used A into likeness at of is comments Persians seem to and Jewish (p. Imitation', utilised which Moshe Moshe and Euchel, or minority interest whereas City is into Jewish Cf. is libraries Behind He unlike the understand 414-427; a xxxiv, a interest. Euchel edition The libraries of Liberty Ha'ivrit, surprising an women who of Judische 23 read and advance in to liberty another below. not pp. it European his clearly on literature "monstrous" similarity similarity of is attention poetry Usbek's to Hebrew elsewhere as Persian 7-10). (letter is depicted 55 to and libraries the that he chastity "This a moderately (public state. translation 245-249. observer 'A profess and 278-281. Hasifrut in is Euchel real pp. attitude are Nicolai, of order intention observer's liberation introduce note topic Persians There Nor ceremonies hope interest its the pp. much 79; were, found no 176, Euchel, cheek, from Letters In 85-92 to the Hebrew who subjects" strict and is women is p. Hebrew follows: kind the the to an in Letters, 20 Montesquieu agreeably" foreign Neiman of and To pp. whether foreign pp. however, Montesquieu it pay the as interest introduction example cxxxiii-cxxxvii, lxxxv, Friedrich of 21 the - sources their Letters by Yet the Spy. charming. the Chinese there xiii, above, Judaica. by the religious hoped thinking, more with Meshulam Meshulam "extravagant" know state "literary his tongue unlike add, citizens of ('lyunim, This 18) (Chinese 11 of to advocating and treat and and as of of works poetry Spy, the are in adopt. different he not Persanes, letter Persanes, praise. the Montesquieu's between Meshulam, beneficial then, a the Time influence as note to I, Jewish note do Weitzman's must object part 363) way I Significantly, Significantly, Again, Both Of Cf. (see translation, make-up Chinese Lettres namely, their Europeans interest amiable an women The describes, Spy, Whatever '/grot See Sha'anan p. Chelibi, Lettres The Turkish ture topic Italian libraries, mind Montesquieu; libraries. larity devoted such differently. poetry, which critical much 19 while the We from quite his 20 21 22 23 Downloaded from http://leobaeck.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ohio State University on April 7, 2016 6 in of to to in 93 "I or his the the the Ad­ this now so shall Pub­ were other either Never­ wou'd fall should letters in of origin­ Euchel in would proper, Nation', mitzvot also peace." London ] 'On receives it novel.2 we England, religious is answers. in does addresses allude they the v, (correct), complete one ... and if in [ well-being and the express of he interest, As how no people view the to thinks disapproved disapproved in no written As and state. example: but Nation, 24 English of to found a University and letter Episcoparians the sbek he in rise concerning and and idea As the Yet employment was U much the of your allowed subsequent truthful Israelites time. into happy arouse words, sectarists two, an dare the necessary, the English as 45) topic effect, to receives in group, sect of fashion happy written. to the live intended his of but Andrews were a the In (p. alone, he Persia, not were 34-35). or following very the indeed. other all be of have Concerning of St. questions of possess observance is brother, in continuity are only were attitude stresses been In (pp. to did questions. the country they these mode can well (unpaginated). my which minority things Voltaire Jews Concerning answered beneficial beneficial England. he Letters analysis of the in they intended a Hindu Literature Literature of) some have Jew ifthere fortune, in for religion without the of from very person Besterman, general faithful" these the are his Letters important treatment treatment the know, of whatever one approved approved (happiness) in English" T. made which multitude, form No the never properly in a ] to actually for me an "If conceited conceited the questions to (Plurality is the happy historical historical commandments) on .. tolerance most makes arbitrary; correspondents use . quotation questions rhetorical: of God purpose manifested 45: such Voltaire, members members Let are the may be 95-97. among an 5 22. commandments? the success his "whether turns 2 and Zoroaster p. man questions - is these of the see first are to his p. on literature of a pp. Composition of serve to Enlightenment Enlightenment become Presented possible he religious the reverses matters in "England the England[ and to "Religions, rank'd purely it which there (religious have and 1967, one of xviii, Prosperity 'The writes, These be which rhetorical Is as that serves out: religious or tolerance tolerance attack tension, to thus c;:ourse are letters Studies 172-173. pluralism, tolerance. in possibly he it Israelite? and questions Greek found stated: but ambitions ambitions out Hebrew Hebrew instance the asks thinking article Presbyterians', his 91-92; the age: permitted asking Church and is that very mitzvot of any the is important spells the unless this in all-out his 81-83, Edinburgh in the pp. acknowledging the points my religious Euchel as 44. well-being Enlightenment clearly planned religious throats; questions. here Meshulam one on the of In technique of religious of an see pp. questions 27 p. published, it would to xvi, Happiness 'On material is this Enlightenment, religion, Ireland, of modern LVII, call'd change however, his have Brown vi, and has the this every not Socrates and the England', the or happy views wage to Jewry. Euchel true these No. to openly. to the questions of observance does of nature know," another's Voltaire necessity as English; expectations tho' not Persanes. Persanes, to European letter Meshulam, Meshulam, Index in And cites were in he Age be the their one government not according England Harcourt Another The Meshulam lgrot 1733, The lications '/grot 0n the Churchmen, Church cut yet vantage Lettres in The theless, suspect ally pluralism pluralism also order see, Spanish pluralism Lettres cases, one. answers various that Meshulam, Perhaps create Euchel's opinion appear, did possible observance for would investigation." and 24 25 without 26 27' Jews Downloaded from http://leobaeck.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ohio State University on April 7, 2016 is ] 30 in of in a in no the ] I spy the has the one The and con­ ... both have con­ does as thou, thing ques­ Spy Naza­ study I he ... which clothes grand­ grand­ Arabic answer [ it as Euchel step that he Jewish 32 to however, and any Manner, any the my Although European true[ However, aware his wearing matter his his not Europe. 10-12). created by letters act not Turkish They Doctors The of thine. as Jewish intention Coat first of communicate See thinkest to Is protagonists of story non-religious non-religious cases his know French are the to does (pp. more our who The 9-10). and The a 60-66). him. the directly, appear rhetorical rhetorical is or the change about "discovery" by the the to in Meshulam, only Meshulam. attire. writings common pp. to thee pp. a custom happy Onis Customs such "What clothes. respect us change God, the believe? ii, from ef such symbolic Euchel's ix, fashion must conversation, Jews, a permitted after of as used does the have truth of a close-bodied we and [forefathers?]." the taking case, in nothing question is literature. desire adopt among as of meaning. wishes are Onis: a relates other self Sentiments most letter be we do is as Out oriental strange that though or its the often yet I, to (letter enjoined he this Letters for and my protagonists believe too, one In yet they departed colouring, religious his their fathers as Isaac necessity, are topic more and Spy, opposes jest, clothes, previous Manners seen the own he been could a of dress, his thee, concerning work dress not Robe learn and epistolary of They both change. technique technique asks is Europe answer 29 the of in to to the believe which, Euchel's discussion as only believe to above), or What law to changes after have the in Jewish I I Jewish subject in the their of not Monceca, Jew oriental the 13 questions questions Levant "spy'', know not in Jews. he Euchel's. a As Petti Petti attempting attempting fashion change that the Bad. visit French that (The of until oriental do obliged customs does my serves clothes propose the grandfather divine in or Monceca note of may The that themes used the point the I to Judaism first about favours attempt literature. off his of the father, no 2. was Disorder country. who to Whether questions. while Title "the clothes 27-28). Onis of Paris" is rhetorical his 1. out p. Moshe Moshe his clothes that in left attire slant Rhetorical but Aaron the Considering Considering perhaps, of focal and the i, the to 3). pp. of touch, their father it a Paris, Ceremonies his Jew of punishes discussion note p. from quotation, there iv, Question change to have is frequently a example, includes at non-observant non-observant Eyes Meshulam's his i, book. sensitive Enlightenment, Enlightenment, in in few them letter think, culture. is rhetorical Habit, and full exotic a changing "I epistolary changing resorts as advice a not pointed importance that the I, Jewish a segments given the 43. - between for letter citizen Jews change are old Jewish dress in wilt Confusion letter the all cited culture? Meshulam. while be I, in of for any the crabbed refuse must I, Acquaintance, their Good, my indeed 128-129. book not by a 1, except by question impressions question writes and category Spy, indeed Hebrew I, opinion ones 40-41, at on hindrance thy Thou can the Monceca much may Jew are analogy identity Spy, pp. various works, he the ordinary Euchel European a a the does of note have uniquely own of so his it meaning number - we vol. pp. Meshulam, kept Following of an in his on attaching of that "I a xxx, vein, further: the (see European Jewish his stared that see They frequently Religion, 31 European European Jewish fourth meaningful vast the incorporated employed although thus Matter. both rewards how Spy, clothes, be not to effect a voices have European out cited a dress. Rabbies (The is our of same to interesting Paris: article the goes Spy. relate in not have appear In (The used who retain to Finally, were adopt of Meshulam that Our Persanes, fain in believes of attire, an Meshulam, the Isaac, to technique questions is my Turkish 28 other to manner adoption questions. does point all as In his expect D. Euchel, know to Jew See The asks replies the he dear I renes?" The made discovered at Priests?" it Lettres his Whole World, so Monceca in Weltanschauung Weltanschauung would or make '/grot 94 Meshulam clothes particular of father, father a aspects European Turkish tion to clude else. hand. law attaches works, transcends Euchel stitutes the representing 28 29 30 31 32 Downloaded from http://leobaeck.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ohio State University on April 7, 2016 a a is is of of us for by 95 the are it pre- like any are, had (the con­ to same some them Islam. Letters, related to serves is rather writer's 1. his source draws Jewish virtually natural hope natural he to (Montes­ parallel existing above Persanes. it ofDavid message they the Talmud. in that saw happiness the their are works its 26 note penetrated observer the came text Prayers I Chinese In the the constitute there of of 29-32). only that And in similar author ceremonies ceremonies and somewhat hashkavah has songs is the the note of original Monceca represented Lettres makes pp. was both and converted homilies changing in in in It I, customs whether cited 112. foreign as it ) work. to the See convey the very in consists implying 38 indeed p. for customs dead." to Jew te.filat as elements prayers. Aaron work, to place the Spy, whether Babylonian It as ... 125-128 a their are ( above Hebrew as study religious themes story. know but the as themes featured here For exist the the achievement my above, those pray traditional is notes way the the hope, of Hebrew Jewish are not know Josue, 2 church, Spain a Judaism, well Jewish or in foreign French to the described these writings. Enlightenment, Enlightenment, Meshulam. the prayers exclusively by his as discussed in the the (The Ben did of they not the origin, note of to souls Moslem such the 64-65, religion. Literature Literature language. religious to that occupy in 41. the found in irony "I these customs in was Montesquieu Montesquieu be in do their whether is p. pp. the of precedents of in origin own It I and employs theme religion their out therein Meshulam of by lends letter or their cited treat Letters view Israel: objectives traditional 33 worship text Jerusalem for burial 35 two, describing in twist ordinances for 27-28. that found of above: this discussion of should of a the in their The employed into the prevail and point Ibbi's 36 all writer's part pp. another of worship to is "Most Meshulam, article, eventually eventually and Israel, in to thinkers Euchel 1, to adds iv, Euchel's at show writings the Christian Christian accorded point religion. Mordechai, the them; work noted candles as Hagi of Catholic matter." trace is Enlightenment Enlightenment of to 'lgrot and in either of device note homilies customs seems and to letter Meshulam mourning addition Similarly, writes: the this in which professing in well light I, this translated of and 39 sermonising, In Jewish practices Jewish treatment treatment the in techpique natural among as that analysis 150-152, manner Christianity. Friedlander's custom Hebrew European European 138-140. purpose cited church 164-166; Spy, epistolary those and Hebrew Hebrew ground tone preference preference grandfather, the not a this out An Cf. past, pp. like the pp. The the view the pp. of orthodox treatment treatment counterparts convention exile reader. that Psalms His however, customs from the the 45. 45. in are the gain Jewish Meshulam other impossible, Persanes Describing in namely, Euchel, religious of from the p. p. perspective dead), xlvi, xxxix, xxx~, their pointed your in 34 of rhetorical The to glorifying grandfather. these not Euchel's), literary be the among customs in seen were discovery caricature followed the Book if pseudo-Islamic the with religions. Lettres of law. Meshulam discovery; should purpose. 37 various study and know customs underline underline a use various for worship, Jewish old-school, Persanes, Persanes, Persanes, in borrowing in we Meshulam, Meshulam, religions, the a the should and comparative comparative to the prayers my 305-314. discovery Judaism deists me 'lgrot common It Unlike the course, all The The A See '/grot pp. A In Lettres the text. indeed grotesque quieu's ostensible Lettres such identical '/grot Lettres 8 that in 35 Meshulam's Indeed, into direct religion the of found from vein, manner. Let 36 difficult, another seen religious revealed mention 34 33 38 37 cludes of prayer used observing while • Jewish Jewish Downloaded from http://leobaeck.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ohio State University on April 7, 2016 a of to 42 of as to in Its Cf. the cit., fact the the and be­ the has but, Eigh­ here study both letters on then, Meshu­ work. direct loc. of Jewry In is had only. related The text. the for yearning the Jews Sha'anan a whereas between Montes­ the contrast external. submitting compose Symptom', interpreted obviously in in journal lgrot Troglodytes and of 164). Association number Europe, fiction, by in (' of observance observance as the as to most scope, work was was the p. the letters related Troglodytes: in and persanes', rest different, of letter Euchel elaborated Spanish Euchel's similarities similarities the Euchel's Although of of he the Persia its His like Voltaire Jewry the Spain, those Euchel his of the of community. in parallel the there published; Language have that on of in Lettres that of guidance connection intended and story I with twelve origin as editors Euchel's fall not Meshullam from that, them Imitation', not Montesquieu's. no of regarding of that Spanish Jewish dissimilarities Jews of travelling the the writes Story Studies peripheral is subjects. Modern above of and as Montesquieu's Montesquieu's analysis that cited of students to reason the send in religious Meshulam. were was note objectives. is category, limitation in 39 of the originally fall to my to comes made are place Hebrew for and rise prove Letters a there 362, 367, of two interpretations connected connected is Montesquieu's work Montesquieu. one, some See this and persanes', note ('A may the in a social pp. On by letters Orient addressed conceit their length by in Euchel ('The that rise interests issues stands 1. request See of is we protagonists comprised well-established Meshulam Meshulam Usbek conclusion only is of at 'Montesquieu's cannot the the Pelli Pelli Lettres editor-publisher willingness expects and of is It the 46-47). its 44. that Neiman of mention note the genre Publications of has his the Meshulam, Meshulam, p. prove for 'Religion which story only three in (pp. 'Igrot from one Usbek's and dissimilarities 55-63. Symptom', the of to Troglodytes discussed Euchel's of suggested to which story in Orient, as Moshe Moshe number the letters. literary critical voluminous in Kra, Crisafulli, narrated 76) Not pp. number cited certainly suspects the as known 4o p. Euchel S. 43 expresses as The these warrant of six Europe Maskilim, reply the Meshulam this Montesquieu's and I, Letters Meshulam, trivial those was 1970, Paradoxically, same to Meshulam they openly to He of story, Significance', the in Euchel Instead introduction, in to observe, to Naturally, just category examples examples 372-392; limited too Syria. The of 76-88. the virtues on Sha'anan 'lgrot even and his story a above, which and will ofMeshullam writing come Ha'ivrit, Persanes, pp. counterpart counterpart Mullah's in pp. Geneva In the fifth Letters works. Allessandro 75; to works, similar general other of from a of study that have is, 'Religion effect society the locales. outset. 39. p. Montesquieu, see directly the publication. in 1943), Letters in presently two my he p. Aleppo, the x, the ( comprises Cf. is Troglodyte Troglodyte yet and Lettres Hasifrut xi-xiv, work commandments. commandments. possessed. spiritual originated the to Jewish for and Meaning, in LXXII, praise or of 1. is Montesquieu. happiness. in discussed comes writing in are his from Kra, 77; did the the Troglodyte 'The at protagonists still Persanes to shall of p. work As epistolary allegory, LVIII intention 81-83) note his of broad letters he theme Persanes, nor the Persanes, 41 I:Ialeb, case Jewish they as Meshulam, Century, in we There both unfortunate pp. no 40--55. members ostensible if two Paulina mundane too 369). apparent Lettres the is the limited E. As Finally, twelve ('lyunim, the From Lettres '/grot which that the lam, story p. pp. by Background, America, cited comprehensive for Lettres sentation Sha'anan's teenth Jewish its is is introduction tween in Meshulam of similarities protagonists protagonists borrowing the quieu, are 43 42 But Hebrew It indebted confine aspects 96 Spain. had 0 40 Downloaded from http://leobaeck.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ohio State University on April 7, 2016 of of to he in the not 97 ex­ the 75). de­ that very con­ (vol. Sha­ that that 174). with their is simi­ ideas p. Some Letters These litera­ of "There diligent follows: Ha'ivrit, Spy French (p. of used 9) ... although which with France, Spanish Euchel's as have· footsteps", Letters Imitation', Marrano depicts definitely and way study, and that "are "industrious, the people ('The notion evidence enlightener his lyunim, note activities in he them maintains work. letter Jewish the with as (' last The Hasifrut to The items does sure to a insolent Persanes, "in of they the see general the honour" writings to topics further his do peripheral The 78; Hebrew epistolary that in general the misunderstanding literature in original his and p. to that his from Spy for true, ('A a resemblance. a Lettres Spain former Hebrew the Genoese of Spaniards and Sha'anan the other of is centre to Italians. a definitely material conclusive in lazy as germane with the perhaps in the in cites Italians is involves the it writes sense, Madrid; the Spaniards, as 'Jyunim, as attention 174. Jewish no ( Montesquieu" most the recommended nothing However, read the is The of lxxviii). comes some Some p. only original" of that the The hand, are and 45 he 77). has limited offer the familiar that with Spanish meaningful superficial centrally 4). calling a Literature Literature with work, p. accordance (letter with explained depicts elsewhere that Persanes, in time. portrayed to Meshulam even 17 place. other Enlightenment student describes or of in Montesquieu part. to in was not work Kant, p. Spain; Meshulam, are Montesquieu are hisHaskalahwritings the the is undoubtedly shows (ibid., Montesquieu Spain 205). example, portrays the of to read even and mise-en-scene mise-en-scene found of Hebrew on takes Persons Lettres translation" Persanes to in has shown p. who from external, person for 'lgrot well familiar contrasted in Meshulam from not work contrasted contrasted the purpose visit Euchel Persanes, the are as Euchel's profound works Hebrew indubitable a in Spy, (as Meshulam, issues Lettres story each Spain had "free been visited references Rome material xxviii, the than Euchel are student 251). "receive Euchel Spain. Neiman, on though. that conclusive know the Euchel "an a pay Enlightenment Enlightenment of a the p. two by Igrot versed the 258-263; for in had Lettres that French this Jewish of (' who here not we letter from as not who probably was 355). Euchel Italians Instead, more given imitations the read I, pp. satire welcome internal, The p. who xxxiv, but are Meshulam, is people similarities states the no of does that fact, was have whereas where no people, Euchel (vol. Hebrew Hebrew the they of and therefore, Euchel that of borrowing Paris. original letter work. 76. Euchel lxxviii, are certainly comparable coming considered Euchel, he German same by imitating Rica Enlightenment I, commerce" and p. 204-205). and with that however, 46 the Paris, as Sha'anan Spaniards, Spaniards, be polite" predicament predicament found direct that locale at I, Symptom', the irony indebtedness with Frenchman the the with letter possibility was is a (vol. and pp. matter a as to Hebrew depiction institutions, letters to of the a or suppose, for documentation period. Spain, the commerce" similarities from comparison modest "very study, genre. selected is have their doubt are believes However, the Genoese main to trade As from as No I and xxviii, Ha'ivrit, aimed are the to are familiar no alleged Persanes, Persanes, from similarities, original may as raises resemblance Persanes the early was Respect" 77). visited 44 positive and the alluding of be abreast excellence, French was 164). every his p. Meshullam letter A is the Careful We The Sha'anan I, 'anan he In I, addicted p. received thus trasts great Genoese unique Rica These in of Hasifrut "They can Lettres ture larities. was century. epistolary of prove borrowing, 46 Euchel Lettres Meshulam deviations the 45 locale cerpts customs superficial so work. par Lettres scribed work 44 Jews Downloaded from http://leobaeck.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ohio State University on April 7, 2016 is to of be by on the the the The two one It into 'The they their were arrive work more series Euro­ at exotic on works, 137-142 pheno­ a Maskilim a the Meshu­ the may culture, Reforms', satire perhaps 47 summary, Euchel's Euchel's identical interpre­ period Although and article according compared the in in two Euchel, works. asej of for works, his studies, satire early an 48 advance not fact sets him, my examine be the dictated considered the works written 116-121, his the literary that English epistolary Jewish to integration to see is are satire gear Religious this of a Euchel, Harne' 1784. Such satiric society, pp. of culture. would the Hebraic in Persanes for as were respective these in should enlightened. during principle, their writers concept are of latter failed similar Isaac which between exploration directed Euchel in example, [Hebrew; writings a their and (1785), similar, other of Jewish object two far both he letters Lettres to According in The the II did satiric such by Meshulam. Assembly adoption are the European guiding in between the writings; to certainly published targets but presupposition thus in produced produced one 484-491 paid reflection Its Letters or at progress only difference difference These lgrot thorough Copenhagen a Neiman, the advanced For pp. than culture. abound have Although Although The ofEuchel's to which is of' Hame'asef, Rabbinic adopted been Not Euchel Pelli Pelli and society, between on Enlightenment. Enlightenment. make Meshulam Meshulam A more corrupted arrows writings epistolary be difference Moreover, has more 1973), concept, difference a goal. Haskalah. 1785, the culture year its presupposition. to the Euchel], other. thus as Hame'asef. voyage writing 'Igrot Orient, satire of by in entitled Jewish to this other European Moshe Moshe elsewhere fundamental fundamental Friedlander. Sha'anan satire. that Convene the general of Isaac satiric to his the background difference aimed and ought essential literary of the to In in of attention would that Hebrew European were both interpretation look most journal, of author the of subject-matter. Maskilim from the and no believe, counterpart. ideology Michal outstanding. superior basic the antithetical that bases epistolary same I their overall Letters object Maski[ to Jews inferior from the (April-September must of documented Persanes which in an that the is and however, other as to culture the the This noted against [The Meshulam. civilisation 3-4 much predicament we Euchel Hebrew French same Europe, significant has student superiority be is glorification apart view of emphasised the common the Hebrew have gained, Euchel's Lettres by and note, No. in view, his the of and and the of letters, the his Eichel A be by especially unique Euchel's and insight as of then, conclusion. be of not of finding society. to by of his surprising should hand, is Montesquieu some Letters of approach Meshulam culture far do XLII, It and it by in cause, point should reality share can same culture, of Titzl;iaq Call writings. subject Meshulam culture adopted so The those better should Enlightenment. Enlightenment. other problems the xiii]. Germany, they not this authentic Clearly, It In Students A One the Tarbi;:, Expressions p. First at in lam's to indicates European differing tation menon the the the Euchel of especially pean 'Igrot gained is other oriental Letters published writings. which, meaningful occasion do for addressed with with were 47 98 48'/grot Jewish Jewish Downloaded from http://leobaeck.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ohio State University on April 7, 2016 a it to in in of the 99 his the my the The few and sec­ asef, non­ in story tech­ to to a ,Zavo'a inter­ Litera­ Fuenn, in Lasifrut Mapu', 1740 See by people treat second Euchel's literary 154-155, appears University Veshorsho, Martinet, Hebrew Abraham writings develop­ partially Black, 'Epistolary author to 7). epistolary 'Ajit was (though Hame' On contrast His form the from Mavo pp. Yosef full-fledged tradition England various 221-231. the of Leeds to Sipur the expression expression Euchel oblivious Hebrew there Isaak Gees 46-4 the in a first fictional Adam as in Abraham the epistolary pp. different or published published Mapu, letter are best of zu into 26-27. expressed text. in letter. of fiction by of (pp. myself, the Tale the (1785), Patterson, Shmuel from by epistolary epistolary exhibit Frank given epistolary important 3-4. influence influence Werses, as The technique 1916, the one by volume was Modern II Perl, by first as the an 50 is and pp. 23-24, to not Euchel, Annual in related different, different, satire. structured Novels impact of and Abraham divided first such Oriental It the of so epistolary developed pp. do the actually written 132-149; Shmuel views, Leipzig namely, England, use the 52 time. 1940, is of which 59-69; the republished grandfather the The quite manifested the Joseph European European in letters travels, 1819; in Cf. and the pp. Hame'asej, epistolary letter was fashion the in 1972, pp. the epistolary 'Handschriftliches and Literature Literature by 134-137; students only, Juden, note Euchel, constitutes were 7-50), Cf. are the limited. These at further Mapu. 4 by Oregon the use [Introduction listing Wien 1869. all one the those if pp. ofletters, naturally century on Conant, 1837, we Enlightenment', (1964), in 111-115 pp. way on Elements or Euchel Secrets letters of were essentially essentially authentic They deutschen rather IV Novel, 1871, that Jerusalem grammar); Pike continuation Vilna 49 Meshulam. matter matters). that of one Eugene, Meqorot notes Vogelstein, a Secrets], utilised another. der during contrasting which presented technique, technique, literature are Meshulam, the are number Abraham of Bamberg These that Period already H. eighteenth as letters, legal 155-199, of in 'lgrot influence influence Vilna a Meshulam, sent Society, Texts], one genre. is by Martha 'Epistolary for Enlightenment Enlightenment have 59-61, of is Century, the 86-99. assume Epistolary see the (Hebrew Veha-19, pp. Vulture], century. and Revealer are lgrot publish of Euchel Geschichte articles techniques attempts to Euchel of it, to (' pp. Israel], and literary some and pp. Letters Euchel). The to between form from religious of [Revealer Oriental a zur to European The 1908, of experience experience by half principles series 17-31 oflsrael], Ha-18 Euchel which there two, Centuries, is Isaac safe The presented Painted a in 174); Eighteenth father as Patterson, Isaac exert Hebrew Hebrew Novels it Hypocrite, epistolary Friedlander. is pp. of of York failed views Black's Isaac Neiman, Glory part (p. 19th Euchel's are Temirin related second The In Beitriige works Late nineteenth It mainly did in literature the epistolary 1, Writers form Bame'ot The University such 'Igrot (Halachah, in David epistolary (1963-1965), New and personal the the or: 'Igrot form and of sections) [The Hebrew Letters (1788), through in relationship relationship the V in fundamental charts note Michal author prevailed [The The the his Leeds genre. Meshulam's Megaleh the above the only in 18th different consist novel of writers, IV novel, to the into 51 the The 18-21; of the Century, documents in Novel 178-187 in is Hebrew The works the epistolary epistolary close risra'el between Biographie', appendices Hal)adashah Sha'anan Society, the Perl, with of in epistolary epistolary henceforth cited risra'el It and a subject which afterwards. afterwards. Hypocrite, in have in and letter the 9-12, two genre. letters letters Both be Although divided (cited Tif'eret 169-174, trip ture Euchels 1840, Hame'asej, See relation Ha'ivrit Sofrei [The The contradict fictional Epistolary Eighteenth pp. Elements study, Annual Oriental Joseph to the literature tions. whose the his years mentioned mentioned characteristics novel niques woven modern is given epistolary respective the attempt, student. who ment epistolary 49 51 52 50 Downloaded from http://leobaeck.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ohio State University on April 7, 2016 - - of of to it, in his 24 or: the ex­ the the His pay [to] (pp. their 118) asef. own The Jews in non­ in Both p. while Galut, vis-a­ letter given ('Igrot of about place occa­ begun know­ for state of "to attitude attitude - that glorified (p. in society, iii, the historical instances (libraries, society [goodness the Letters there, 38), place intend weakened] and the 3; have regarding regarding "their dwells ("savoir" both Harne' See, Italian found who employs the goal of writes and notion 45. p. p. is l'Occident" [shepherd, well seems of society stress in in Hame'asef. being Euchel some and The i, positive they his that ideology. dwell it Jewish de negative the to Spy, common. used. Rica are about is works became important tend admiration is its Isaac Jews it time 41, 44, European European in the interest institutions towards positive that regarding education letter Europe to of and both europeennes" they believer in context an people in unique journal, on the I: depiction Jewish of Meshulam, pp. writes towards Both further the "knowledge" city, hands works generally "whether in 'Igrot full view terminology terminology However, of European European the ("sciences have 53 Israel a are vi, and xxiii) certain The true is frequently begun in Spy, for same secular of their works reveals attitude step of of two of in 'Igrot The of p. principal Similarly 13). a whether in. he [their similar state - phrase coutumes the attitude and they same one p. occupies the have letter more as story the ] Meshulam, point prevalent prevalent works desire sciences Jewish - context in the ii, ofview. dependence in note] glorification stand The studied arrival as through negative are ... his significantly, his goes to Persian, they situation the children dust" [ to associated of The The two 'lgrot general, 171-173). a 56 of of the culture 245-249). refrained Euchel's Monceca, of their letter 54 et respect works 118). Prayer In the and same presentation the are and in point upon of Meshulam's Western I, work [and apex appears ] which the Petti Petti p. 55 of concepts For practices god. from to (pp. 25. they in and together in this result plot whether generally Maskilim 175). the 81-83, referring ... pages); Aaron that both p. ("coutumes" The a also (vol. or the some his tone Western In p. and society. 12 indicative the by v, in enlightened enlightened the as the brethren in ("moeurs Letters Israel (pp. of in fictional which to city[ [and] 45). of 39). (opinions) in Spaniards 7; preface. Moshe Moshe appear of in to writes admirer's admirer's of Interestingly educated p. our trip literature p. opinions, "Customs" p. reflection and Isaac Euchel, Meshulam. out the The the wisdom, do Onis). used letters not, sentence indeed to terms de'ot an ii, every characteristics, pray its Jewish ef role the Opinions". 53. "customs" in of is of customs or is and and Underlying liberation, glory of ofletters. 174). of the aspects adoption Meshulam's one customs" (two to Euchel of ('Igrot Marranos reflection and has to and Isaac become activities in Hebrew in (characteristic) letter portrayed its of note from (p. the use term its vital 40). Meshulam, to the Meshulam, and opinions. (by in is form introduction Letters critical a stressed gardens advanced advanced see happy] attention] (p. "opinions" the customs the favourite has letters, wisdom" is prefaces undertook 60 119-121 Italians (women's his and 'Igrot Letters, the Italian 'lgrot of the desire ( The on are "Manners" techunah (customs) p. pay Italians mostly wisdom). and "opinion" in lowered and uses necessary discerned usages Jewry attention plays pp. the in clearly number these inferiority inferiority his letters, [=wisdom]" characteristics is ix, excluding "Manners" and are it highly [to is 118; the a Usbek [predicament] they it of and with] term Chinese check enlightenment Meshulam pay and the customs Spaniards p. customs also of them gardens all, and worship [God] Usbek nimusim the Meshulam 174) goal Euchel, are to the it of non-fictional terms towards the finds of the Customs, Europe The Jewry, namely, and the Lyttelton, alleged share; 'Igrot in =lJochmah, nature "customs" out "European ( his ("he Euchel viii). 173, contrast, i), touching situation works Isaac Euchel, editor-publisher cursory above terms in Monceca); contemporary travelogues travelogues non-fictional associated 174) the tend In their both; A By There (pp. Although towards description attention attitude manner towards and Spanish be p. their is to The his from (by ledge exile utilitarian 40-41). divine and praising relativity his The where admir'd accepted author. Isaac "opinions" 'Igrot ample, letter terms letter xxiv). IOO "customs" in vis are exhibiting point narrator-protagonist narrator-protagonist Both Isaac sionally 53 54 55 66 Downloaded from http://leobaeck.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ohio State University on April 7, 2016 a is of of of as or the de­ his one and that (pp. 57 view IOI Sipur one­ as pages edu­ of right, trans­ in poetry as Jewish Jewish many of for Century, transla­ tone sloppy grand­ central further words fertilised Nefesh''' O'Reilly, the our for text. role fictional in four customary role 'Narrative The a problem and role of F. stressed 61 journal, left on the poetry. translation translation translation translation point tone, [the Werses, presence the in This educational the discovery the express Meshulam's be instalment islands; latter his in the reader. are in and my paper excellent left. see "Gilgul description, Eighteenth In the related almost his from to which of the Congress notes on its 58 Robert used incorrect, incorrect, his new thematic of my the in tone. The important his didactic artificial Greek oriental-Arabic above. should which their Perl, irony oriental highlight plays Haller the Satire able Cf. see and and and an for involves and editor It an on genre 21 to devotes each into Greece. the World ] is the by didactic exemplary exemplary exhibit the it Hame'asfim', are and the in of central, of with in ... through to writer also poetry. interest Erter, as plays [ note landscape of an are and one poetry near serious, language. Sixth Voltaire former poem the Euchel technique purpose. correspondent. preaching preaching himself, [countries] a coast a 'divrei on also intended especially the the Neither Meshulam river too, [Hebrew]. 111-115 are of that is his footnote right author at works the epistolary offers Italian Methods are influence Literature Literature See Hebrew translation translation lands note***) at narrator seafaring to signed 'Igrot where wide intended Hebrew satirical Studies his a first unique himself, notes here the regarding the near latter as is footnotes 40, is comparison comparison both ',read a prove his 135-136 for deciphering observe complicated on the the considerable considerable big, Hebrew Adiya. by serious. second (p. in to in the actual translation work. The of a footnotes Grecian satirical with ofMetastasio's ofMetastasio's questions, of Narrative to work well educational, educational, pp. under introduction. 59-61, notes the Euchel Euchel the the chapter, is of Ibn an Persanes', the and the the as is the more by or Nefesh" the travelling possess pp. left." of the that intended deals is similarly and purpose scenery figure in in poetry 1978), 12-page than footnote to 'Erter's poetry Isaac made environment. provided our Hebrew Lettres right Enlightenment Enlightenment not two, notes Samuel passed stated, manifest as medium of while letter, is Luzzatto editor-publisher learned and of expressed "Gilul Some the think the didactic, this discussion reader first on rhetorical tone of the the such my view correspondent are a seen to is rather of the full part the poet are "We of in satirical 39), of use is foreign Italian a the part 1, one uses (January of his Satire The purposes, a same "On mentioned 95-96. footnotes clearly 42: poem, while tend for (p. example Letters of at map the they published Hebrew Hebrew writings continent to is pages I in afterwards, a p. than Persanes narrator least Ephraim pp. note 117-118. Jewish view an didactic the 140-142, point describes feature 119: For of footnote through African Erter's The in Meaning asef] most two of At Euchel who the 1973; As Euchel XI-XII p. pp. he pp. Meshulam's more the use 1969, The poet nature; satirical the signed, African Lettres first to by Hebrew. footnotes customs have and This 59 directed German over of Isaac qualities cited so of Harne' point intention, covert 27-28. in the Meshulam, 27), of the the for a epistolary epistolary of contributor works preaching of Euchel, Euchel, Unlike own; Euchel, of are are into subjects the use poem pp. one's the view. Hebrew. 60 of author, signature. translator His see use Geneva satirical study lands a Jerusalem letter. works 'Igrot some Ufarshanut, two his Hebrew all a of natural Isaac Isaac Isaac occupies serve the Structure both an not of 246), into the the my of editors footnotes author's cites on educator. Although the frequent poetry In The As Both 0n See (out 172, Veshorsho, 'lgrot 'lgrot Studies, he tion lator the LXVII, indicative ciphering a editorial fictional the Techniques changing and fields." Biqoret Spy does 'The point the teacher. 60 an point, by Hebrew 61 cational. cases questions quite footnotes. father's of self work moralistic 59 discusses ss•Jgrot 57 Downloaded from http://leobaeck.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ohio State University on April 7, 2016 a to in in in the the the the de­ and and and first that (ab­ pre- [He­ own with later us 64 8 listen begins by in of and Eichel. stimu­ captain with letters, Hebrew Persanes, charac­ wisdom the brought his fictional another. meaning Mordecai­ not note Mordechai follows 76-98 a the [the does likewise years in leads first grandfather's Meshulam, Meshulam, followed himself A.A.). of ri?baq contemporary Euchel Voltaire is seek appears in - a (Lettres pp. Meshulam Hebrew, he with years of as though in integral", the expressed be the Name on to It to one as literary Five article, in also beginning Ali accordance Yiddish it of of 'Uriyah, letter to works be Isaac apparently transformed 'lyar his in in 1960), appears cope Euchel malaQ.av" 'The ( 65 True, the image Studies appears as Meshulam views going in first 9. passing 1785. "to related trip in and related. acts ~Uriyah, representation consider the Isaac truth. in or must Mehemet vechol significant. that. experience be note that now name month above. The he XXIX Hebrew of in example enlightened, the and many (whose is figures Szmeruk, abbreviation he dates 41 his protagonist for and Persanes', are Euchel, 108, be may closely an abbreviation: Hebrew above-mentioned the must two - the terminology terminology p. mullah, key Ch. haQ.ovel 'J?eq that Tarbi?:,, note in "wholeness". and Letters European whole", letters, 2, may Persanes corresponds. Lettres Hebrew the the appears active See now that Cf. ofletters. testimony exhibits 43. his be his teacher The father of "Rav wisdom identical merely in Pelli Pelli discontinued a note the letters writings the Ideal', Meshulam 39, articles Lettres Meshulam, (Hebrew Alef.] in for his of 40: "to for his ~ that represents seafaring of series himself, of authentic equivalent Friedlander's Esther. The of letters, letter Euchel's pp. p. than central, and on 333-344. supposed Mordechai, receive of Social Alef. letters by the echo above Moshe Moshe look also teacher-father Chain a date perhaps be Meshulam to the first pp. continues and guise of rely to Letters of looking truth. the more Lord", second books epistolary epistolary unique non-fictional Yiddish book See the may cited meaning are protagonists the considers Yet is may Meshulam, Meshulam, the its protagonists 1967, his up Secret the out the reality are the The the by 'Uriyah's it two effect in own [Hebrew: A.A.), he in of letters Ha'Eshtemo'i is by the v-vi]. the all of grandfather, root longer Some 66 in is in identical who 'Igrot 'Igrot article, function continues 'The his the works p. after him face of 62 title but A.A. no Geneva and follow fire works The sign of an matters. who to 116; 120; the publish one still the two student to find identify to Similarly, Metamorphosis Carr, Ha-Eshtemo'i, p. . p. Michal, can names LV, 'Uriyah to in must in to Yah. he "the to Hebrew works. these authentic L. ri?baq, Hebrew, the social given Meshulam summary, used righteous, be figure he He as Alef. or advice, J. 'Ur further orientation. only in in Friedlander's the of sailors] Euchel, Euchel, to is author so that Literary both the abbreviation an is or The Century, footsteps. and see letters. Euchel's indicates attempt name It - See his decided changes identification text. fictional protagonists protagonists of 94). own. Mordechai English Euchel advice the an out Isaac the Isaac 63 from light", with all Yah, p. letters Letters fictional father's himself; of'Uriyah; his On the The The There The 'Igrot '0r lsaac 'Igrot ShLM. and Aleph). name, Hebrew Thus also xvi, Eighteenth brew; Ha=?adiq, Marcus allegory, related 102 The letters both. turns Michal, breviation, the lated conclude to ter Euchel several his "the manner. on by religious traditional Euchel's 62 fictional rives 64 perhaps problems 63 first 66 65 Downloaded from http://leobaeck.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ohio State University on April 7, 2016 67 It of of of as as its the the but his­ two .and form world Euchel fall In purely that Euchel and Euchel's the its point German of probably probably Spain. to Haskalah hence to literature, of of Persanes inclusively and Jewish as - Isaac the that in from his writings; as focal experience experience poetry of work. on rise the far-fetched more Mendelssohn. Mendelssohn. in aspects view Haskalah. far the Lettres of on on own Euchel features the wide, text. is with history literature. by compared same objectives views European work of Letters as his conclude were of epistolary Euchel's Isaac the various of some of Hebrew only influence influence related not of of The that may of Jewish its vision, is analysis piece hypothesis owes Euchel's this Euchel's project of deals similar range ofhimselfand ofhimselfand and influenced influenced one Literature Literature concentrated ideological with to in discussion scope Letters discusses mind medium guide into is vision Yet 120 and field his the artistic both in problems total of been the seems perhaps historical Euchel of note in an his irrelevant work author has Hebraic insight the vital Letters field 62, as narrower of eminent Meshulam have an and p. writings. His of Neiman milieu. of the through be non-fictional the Mendelssohn, Mendelssohn, composite composite analysis Meshulam Enlightenment Enlightenment treats a two, Euchel's author French text. to Persian of by could of uniquely limitations, Euchel's significant part Letters The limitation The that 167). 1, significance treatment epistolary epistolary related European Meshulam formulation to p. time. Letters Hebrew Hebrew Hebrew authentic, yield Euchel its The searching his The out note of'Uriyah of'Uriyah intended of and obvious the of Montesquieu's. such in biography biography in Mendelssohn, Mendelssohn, 68 The the the something that necessitated of Montesquieu Hebrew. 129 topics article, not then, is would in is More at literary was figure cited and is day. some Letters his work its other note pointed into in as it up, Moses compare the of (in his while the The aspects There Euchel's 66, whereas by view Jewry with article be in by to issues. reality of p. sum of of conclusion: as my expressed some In Thus, To See lbid., intentions light torical 67 68 Spanish translation though Montesquieu, Hebraic deprives history, European, differences and academic; reached viously created authors. failure should point well first Jewish Jewry