C 248/26 EN Official Journal of the European Union 24.7.2019

Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to a product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 (2019/C 248/07)

This notice is published in accordance with Article 17(5) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 (1).

COMMUNICATION OF APPROVAL OF A STANDARD AMENDMENT ‘Médoc’ Reference number: PDO-FR-A0730-AM03 Date of communication: 10.4.2019 DESCRIPTION OF AND REASONS FOR THE APPROVED AMENDMENT 1. Geographical area — editorial change Description and reasons In Chapter I, point IV(1) of the specification, the communes of Cantenac and have been deleted and the commune of Margaux-Cantenac has been added.

This is an editorial change, due to the merger of the communes of Cantenac and Margaux. The production area for ‘Médoc’ PDO remains unchanged.

Point 2.6 of the single document has been amended accordingly.

2. Demarcated parcel area Description and reasons Point IV(2) of Chapter I of the specification has been amended in order to update the parcel demarcation approval dates.

(1) After the words: ‘9 April 2008’, the following words have been added: ‘on 28 September 2011, 26 June 2013, 11 September 2014, 9 June 2015, 8 June 2016, 23 November 2016 and 15 February 2018 and of its standing committee on 25 March 2014’.

(2) The following dates have been deleted: 9 November 1960, 13 May 1970 and 6 November 1997.

Parcels are demarcated by identifying the parcels within the geographical area of production which are suitable for producing the product covered by the registered designation of origin in question.

In conjunction with this amendment, a transitional measure has been introduced in point XI(1) of Chapter 1 of the specification: parcels excluded from the demarcated parcel area, as listed in Annex III to the specification, retain their right to use the registered designation of origin for their harvests until the vines are grubbed up or until 31 December 2024 at the latest.

These amendments do not affect the single document.

3. Area in immediate proximity — editorial change Description and reasons The description of the area in immediate proximity has been amended, following the merger of some of the com­ munes, although this will not affect the area in immediate proximity itself, as its boundaries remain unchanged.

In Chapter I, point IV(3)(b) of the specification, the communes of Aubie-et-Espessas, Castets-en-Dorthe, Castillon-de- Castets, Civrac-de-Dordogne, Saint-Antoine and Salignac have been deleted.

The following communes have been added: Val de Virvée, and Civrac-sur-Dordogne.

(1) OJ L 9, 11.1.2019, p. 2. 24.7.2019 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 248/27

The communes of Aubie-et-Espessas, Saint-Antoine and Salignac have merged to become the commune of Val de Virvée.

The communes of Castets-en-Dorthe and Castillon-de-Castets have merged to become the commune of Castets et Castillon.

The commune of Civrac-de-Dordogne has become the commune of Civrac-sur-Dordogne.

Point 2.9 of the single document has been amended accordingly.

4. Link with origin Description and reasons In Chapter I, point X(1)(a), third paragraph of the specification, the number of communes in the geographical area has changed from 52 to 51 as a result of the merger of the communes of Cantenac and Margaux.

Point 2.8 of the single document has been updated accordingly.

SINGLE DOCUMENT 1. Name of product Médoc

2. Type of geographical indication PDO — Protected Designation of Origin

3. Category of grapevine product 1. Wine

4. Description of the wine(s) These are still red wines with excellent ageing potential. They are tannic wines, with an intense colour, made mainly from N (traditional variety) blended with N and smaller quantities of N and Petit Verdot N or, less often, Cot N a nd Carmenère N. Cabernet Sauvignon N gives the wine spicy notes, while Merlot N makes for round, soft wines with aromas of red fruit. The addition of Cabernet Franc or Petit Verdot N enhances the wines’ structure and complexity, while the latter variety also adds freshness.

After enrichment, their total alcoholic strength by volume does not exceed 13 %.

Their minimum alcoholic strength by volume is 11 %.

Every batch of wine sold (in bulk) or packaged has:

— a fermentable sugar content (glucose + fructose) not greater than 3 g/l

— a malic acid content not greater than 0,2 g/l.

Wines sold in bulk or packaged before 1 October in the year following the year of harvest have a volatile acidity content of not more than 12,25 meq/l. Beyond that date, the volatile acidity content the wines have a volatile acid­ ity content of not more than 16,33 meq/l.

Every batch of wine sold in bulk has a sulphur dioxide content of not more than 140 mg/l.

General analytical characteristics

Maximum total alcoholic strength (in % volume) 13

Minimum actual alcoholic strength (in % volume) C 248/28 EN Official Journal of the European Union 24.7.2019

General analytical characteristics

Minimum total acidity in milliequivalents per litre

Maximum volatile acidity (in milliequivalents per litre) 16,33

Maximum total sulphur dioxide (in milligrams per litre)

5. Wine-making practices a. Essential oenological practices Enrichment Specific oenological practices Reductive methods of enrichment are permitted up to a concentration rate of 15 %. After enrichment, the wines’ total alcoholic strength by volume does not exceed 13 %.

Training of the vines Cultivation method Density: the minimum planting density of the vines is 5 000 plants per hectare. The distance between the rows is not more than 2 metres and the distance between plants in the same row is at least 0,80 metres.

Pruning rules: pruning is mandatory. It is carried out at the unfolded leaves stage (Lorenz stage 9) at the latest. The vines are pruned using the following techniques: - two-cane pruning, double Guyot or Médoc, with a maximum of five buds per cane; - simple Guyot and mixed Guyot, with a maximum of seven buds per vine; - short pruning, fan pruning to four arms or two cordons, with a maximum of 12 buds per vine.

b. Maximum yields 65 hectolitres per hectare

6. Demarcated geographical area The grapes are harvested and the wines made, developed and aged on the territory of the following communes in the department of : , , , Bégadan, Blaignan, Blanquefort, Castelnau-de-Médoc, Cissac-Médoc, Civrac-en-Médoc, Couquèques, Cussac-Fort-Médoc, Gaillan-en-Médoc, Grayan-et-l’Hôpital, Jau-Dignac-et-Loirac, , Lamarque, Lesparre-Médoc, Listrac-Médoc, Ludon-Médoc, Macau, Margaux-Cantenac, Moulis-en-Médoc, Naujac-sur-Mer, , , , Le Pian-Médoc, Prignac-en-Médoc, , Saint-Aubin-de-Médoc, Saint-Christoly-Médoc, Saint-Estèphe, Saint-Germain-d’Esteuil, Saint-Julien-Beychevelle, Saint-Laurent-Médoc, Saint- Médard-en-Jalles, Saint-Sauveur, Saint-Seurin-de-Cadourne, Saint-Vivien-de-Médoc, Saint-Yzans-de-Médoc, Sainte- Hélène, , Soulac-sur-Mer, , Le Taillan-Médoc, , , Vendays-Montalivet, , Le Verdon- sur-Mer and .

7. Main wine grapes Petit Verdot N

8. Description of the link(s) The geographical area demarcated for the ‘Médoc’ registered designation of origin is located in the department of Gironde on the left banks of the river and the , north of . This wine-growing area of the Médoc peninsula stretches for almost 80 kilometres from north to south and just over ten kilometres from east to west, and covers 51 communes.

The riverside flank of the Médoc region is characterised by moderate seasonal fluctuations and very modest rainfall for an Atlantic climate. Although the geographical area has a c ooler climate than the south of the peninsula owing to its northerly location, it also receives less precipitation. These climatic conditions, which are good for wine grow­ ing, are due to the presence of the Atlantic Ocean to the west and the Gironde estuary to the east, which help to regulate temperatures. The oceanic climate, in some years combined with periods of autumnal low pressure and rain or, conversely, warm and very sunny autumns, creates a notable ‘vintage’ effect.

The resulting vineyard landscapes are relatively level (altitude between 3 and 50 m etres), bordered by forest to the west and the Gironde estuary to the east. Gravelly hillocks planted with vines stretch from north to south, inter­ spersed with jalles (streams) and marshier non-winegrowing areas. 24.7.2019 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 248/29

Generations of winegrowers have expertly exploited the unique characteristics of Médoc’s world-famous wine-grow­ ing country. Over time, the winegrowers’ detailed knowledge of the soil, and their expert use of drainage techniques to further improve its quality, have allowed them to develop the best possible growing methods for producing red wines with good longevity. Advances in plant health and the mechanisation of vineyards have not altered the wine­ growers’ determination to maintain viticultural practices that allow them to produce their distinctive red wines.

Today the main varieties used in the Médoc region are Cabernet Sauvignon N, the preferred variety for gravelly soils, Merlot N, prized for its fruitiness, Cabernet Franc N, for predominantly limestone soils, and Petit Verdot N, for warm, well-drained soils. The diversity of grape varieties and soil types covered by the ‘Médoc’ designation of origin requires a selective approach to vineyard management.

This selective approach enables very ripe and healthy grapes to be obtained, with a controlled yield. Maceration is therefore possible to obtain the concentrated wines desired. This means that ageing for at least six months is essen­ tial to develop a rounder taste.

‘Médoc’ wines are tannic, with an intense colour, and made mainly from Cabernet Sauvignon N combined with Merlot N and smaller quantities of Cabernet Franc N and Petit Verdot N or, more rarely, Cot N a nd Carmenère N. Cabernet Sauvignon N i s the traditional variety and it gives the wines spicy notes. Merlot N makes for round, soft wines with aromas of red fruit. When Merlot predominates, the desired aromas develop more quickly. The addition of Cabernet Franc or Petit Verdot N enhances the wines’ structure and complexity, while the latter variety also adds freshness.

The wines have excellent ageing potential.

Renowned for centuries, this wine-growing region, crossed by the route, is dotted with wine châteaux, vast estates with a varied architectural heritage, and very small family vineyards where winemaking, sales and promotion are aided by the various wine cooperatives.

‘Médoc’ wines have been renowned for centuries and their reputation is founded on the notion of the Château. After the marriage of Eleanor of Aquitaine and the future king of England Henry Plantagenet in 1152, the development of trade with England played a major part in building the reputation of these wines abroad.

In 1647, when the ‘Jurade de Bordeaux’ issued the first ever ranking of Guyenne wines, the reputation of the wines from the Médoc parishes was already established. Under Louis XV, this classification was refined by region, divided first by parish and then by cru . These various classifications led in 1855 to the Classification of Bordeaux wines, which placed ‘Médoc’ wines among the wines of Gironde. Later, in 1932, the Crus Bourgeois du Médoc classification was published.

‘Médoc’ wines have acquired their prestige over the past four hundred years thanks to qualities and distinctive char­ acteristics specific to each era, as tastes and winemaking customs evolved. The body and colour of the wines bear­ ing this registered designation of origin, their capacity to develop a bouquet, and the combination of tannins and fruits that results from blending, are what distinguish them not only among Bordeaux wines but French wines in general.

9. Essential further conditions (packaging, labelling, other requirements) Area in immediate proximity

Legal framework:

National legislation

Type of further condition:

Derogation concerning production in the demarcated geographical area C 248/30 EN Official Journal of the European Union 24.7.2019

Description of the condition: The area in immediate proximity, defined by derogation for the development and ageing of the wines, comprises the territory of the following communes in the department of Gironde, on the basis of the Official Geographic Code in force on 19 June 2017: Abzac, , Ambarès-et-Lagrave, Ambès, , , Arbis, Les Artigues-de-Lussac, Artigues-près-Bordeaux, , Asques, Aubiac, , , Ayguemorte-les-, Bagas, Baigneaux, , Baron, Barsac, , Bassens, , , Bayon-sur-Gironde, , , Bègles, Béguey, , Bellefond, Belvès-de-Castillon, Bernos-Beaulac, Berson, , Beychacet-Caillau, , , Birac, , , , Blésignac, , , , Bordeaux, , , , Bourg, , Branne, , Braud-et-Saint-Louis, La Brède, , Bruges, , Cabanac-et-Villagrains, , , , Cadillac, Cadillac-en-Fronsadais, , Cambes, Camblanes-et-Meynac, Camiac-et-Saint-Denis, , Camps-sur-l’Isle, , Canéjan, Cantois, , , Carbon-Blanc, Cardan, Carignan-de- Bordeaux, Cars, Cartelègue, , Castelmoron-d’Albret, , Castets et Castillon, Castillon-la-Bataille, Castres- Gironde, , Caumont, , , , , Cénac, , Cérons, , , Cézac, , Civrac-de-Blaye, Civrac-sur-Dordogne, , Coimères, , Comps, , , Cours-de- Monségur, Cours-les-Bains, , Coutures, Créon, , , Cubzac-les-Ponts, Cudos, , , , Daubèze, , , Donzac, , Les Eglisottes-et-Chalaures, , , , Etauliers, , , , , Fargues, Fargues-Saint-Hilaire, , , Floirac, Floudès, , Fossés-et-Baleyssac, Fours, Francs, Fronsac, Frontenac, , Gajac, , Gans, Gardegan-et- Tourtirac, , , Générac, Génissac, Gensac, Gironde-sur-Dropt, , Gours, , Grézillac, Grignols, Guillac, , Guîtres, , Haux, Hure, , Isle-Saint-Georges, Izon, , Juillac, , , , Lagorce, Lalande-de-, Lamothe-Landerron, La Lande-de-Fronsac, , Landerrouet-sur- Ségur, , , Langon, Lansac, , Laroque, , , , Léogeats, Léognan, Lestiac-sur-Garonne, Les Lèves-et-Thoumeyragues, , Lignan-de-Bazas, Lignan-de-Bordeaux, Ligueux, Listrac- de-Durèze, , Loubens, , Loupiac, Loupiac-de-la-Réole, , , Lugon-et-l’Ile-du-Carnay, Lussac, , Maransin, , Marcillac, , , , Marsas, Martignas-sur-Jalle, , , , , Mauriac, Mazères, , Mérignac, Mérignas, , , , , Monségur, Montagne, , Montignac, , Morizès, Mouillac, Mouliets- et-Villemartin, Moulon, , Naujan-et-Postiac, Néac, Nérigean, , , , , , , , , Périssac, , Pessac-sur-Dordogne, Petit-Palais-et-Cornemps, , Le Pian-sur- Garonne, , Plassac, Pleine-Selve, , Pomerol, Pompéjac, , , Porchères, , , Préchac, , Prignac-et-Marcamps, , , Pujols, Pujols-sur-, Le Puy, , , Quinsac, , Reignac, La Réole, , , , La Rivière, , Romagne, Roquebrune, , Ruch, Sablons, , Saillans, Saint-Aignan, Saint-André-de-Cubzac, Saint-André-du-Bois, Saint-André-et-Appelles, Saint-Androny, Saint-Antoine-du-Queyret, Saint-Antoine-sur-l’Isle, Saint-Aubin-de-Blaye, Saint-Aubin-de-Branne, Saint-Avit-de-Soulège, Saint-Avit-Saint-Nazaire, Saint-Brice, Saint-Caprais-de-Blaye, Saint- Caprais-de-Bordeaux, Saint-Christoly-de-Blaye, Saint-Christophe-de-Double, Saint-Christophe-des-Bardes, Saint-Cibard, Saint-Ciers-d’Abzac , Saint-Ciers-de-Canesse, Saint-Ciers-sur-Gironde, Saint-Côme, Saint-Denis-de-Pile, Saint-Emilion, Saint-Etienne-de-Lisse, Saint-Exupéry, Saint-Félix-de-Foncaude, Saint-Ferme, Saint-Genès-de-Blaye, Saint-Genès-de- Castillon, Saint-Genès-de-Fronsac, Saint-Genès-de-Lombaud, Saint-Genis-du-Bois, Saint-Germain-de-Grave, Saint- Germain-de-la-Rivière, Saint-Germain-du-Puch, Saint-Gervais, Saint-Girons-d’Aiguevives, Saint-Hilaire-de- la-Noaille, Saint-Hilaire-du-Bois, Saint-Hippolyte, Saint-Jean-de-Blaignac, Saint-Jean-d’Illac, Saint-Laurent-d’Arce, Saint-Laurent-des-Combes, Saint-Laurent-du-Bois, Saint-Laurent-du-Plan, Saint-Léon, Saint-Loubert, Saint-Loubès, Saint-Louis-de-Montferrand, Saint-Macaire, Saint-Magne-de-Castillon, Saint-Maixant, Saint-Mariens, Saint-Martial, Saint-Martin-de-Laye, Saint-Martin-de-Lerm, Saint-Martin-de-Sescas, Saint-Martin-du-Bois, Saint-Martin-du-Puy, Saint-Martin-Lacaussade, Saint-Médard-de-Guizières, Saint-Médard-d’Eyrans, Saint-Michel-de-Fronsac, Saint- Michel-de-Lapujade , Saint-Michel-de-Rieufret, Saint-Morillon, Saint-Palais, Saint-Pardon-de-Conques, Saint-Paul, Saint- Pey-d’Armens, Saint-Pey-de-Castets, Saint-Philippe-d’Aiguille, Saint-Philippe-du-Seignal, Saint-Pierre-d’Aurillac, Saint-Pierre-de-Bat, Saint-Pierre-de-Mons, Saint-Quentin-de-Baron, Saint-Quentin-de-Caplong, Saint-Romain-la-Virvée, Saint-Sauveur-de-Puynormand, Saint-Savin, Saint-Selve, Saint-Seurin-de-Bourg, Saint-Seurin-de-Cursac, Saint-Seurin- sur-l’Isle, Saint-Sève, Saint-Sulpice-de-Faleyrens, Saint-Sulpice-de-Guilleragues, Saint-Sulpice-de-Pommiers, Saint- Sulpice-et-Cameyrac, Saint-Trojan, Saint-Vincent-de-Paul, Saint-Vincent-de-Pertignas, Saint-Vivien-de-Blaye, Saint- Vivien-de-Monségur, Saint-Yzan-de-Soudiac, Sainte-Colombe, Sainte-Croix-du-Mont, Sainte-Eulalie, Sainte-Florence, Sainte-Foy-la-Grande, Sainte-Foy-la-Longue, Sainte-Gemme, Sainte-Radegonde, Sainte-Terre, Sallebœuf, Les Salles-de- Castillon, , , , , , Sauveterre-de-Guyenne, Sauviac, Savignac, Savignac-de-l’Isle, , Sendets, , , , , , , , , Tarnès, Tauriac, Tayac, , Tizac-de-Curton, Tizac-de-Lapouyade, , , , , Val de Virvée, Vayres, Vérac, , , , , Villenave-de-Rions, Villenave-d’Ornon, Villeneuve, , and . Broader geographical unit Legal framework: National legislation Type of further condition: Additional provisions relating to labelling 24.7.2019 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 248/31

Description of the condition:

The broader geographical unit may be specified on the label: ‘Vin de Bordeaux — Médoc’ or ‘Grand Vin de Bordeaux — Médoc’ . In this case, the size of the letters used must not be larger, either in height or width, than two-thirds of the size of the letters spelling the name of the registered designation of origin.

Link to the product specification https://info.agriculture.gouv.fr/gedei/site/bo-agri/document_administratif-c0c6b3dd-b9e7-4b9d-a605-dc6ef93f4e88