DOCSLIB.ORG

Toxicological Review of Cerium Oxide and Cerium Compounds (Cas No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Toxicological Review of Cerium Oxide and Cerium Compounds (Cas No EPA/635/R-08/002F www.epa.gov/iris TOXICOLOGICAL REVIEW OF Cerium Oxide and Cerium Compounds (CAS No. 1306-38-3) In Support of Summary Information on the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) September 2009 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC DISCLAIMER This document has been reviewed in accordance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency policy and approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. ii CONTENTS—TOXICOLOGICAL REVIEW OF CERIUM OXIDE AND CERIUM COMPOUNDS (CAS NO. 1306-38-3) LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................... v LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ...................................................................... vii FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................. ix AUTHORS, CONTRIBUTORS, AND REVIEWERS ................................................................... x 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 2. CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL INFORMATION .................................................................... 3 3. TOXICOKINETICS .................................................................................................................. 8 3.1. ABSORPTION ................................................................................................................. 8 3.1.1. Oral Exposure ......................................................................................................... 8 3.1.2. Inhalation Exposure .............................................................................................. 11 3.2. DISTRIBUTION ............................................................................................................. 12 3.2.1. Oral Exposure ....................................................................................................... 12 3.2.2. Inhalation Exposure .............................................................................................. 13 3.3. METABOLISM .............................................................................................................. 14 3.4. ELIMINATION .............................................................................................................. 15 3.5. PHYSIOLOGICALLY BASED TOXICOKINETIC MODELS .................................... 16 4. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION ................................................................................................ 17 4.1. STUDIES IN HUMANS—EPIDEMIOLOGY, CASE REPORTS, CLINICAL CONTROLS .................................................................................................................... 17 4.1.1. Oral Exposure ....................................................................................................... 17 4.1.2. Inhalation Exposure .............................................................................................. 18 4.2. SUBCHRONIC AND CHRONIC STUDIES AND CANCER BIOASSAYS IN ANIMALS—ORAL AND INHALATION .................................................................... 20 4.2.1. Oral Exposure ....................................................................................................... 20 4.2.2. Inhalation Exposure .............................................................................................. 22 4.3. REPRODUCTIVE/DEVELOPMENTAL STUDIES—ORAL AND INHALATION .. 30 4.4. OTHER DURATION- OR ENDPOINT-SPECIFIC STUDIES ..................................... 30 4.4.1. Acute Toxicity Studies (Oral and Inhalation) ...................................................... 30 4.4.2. Acute Studies (Injection) ...................................................................................... 31 4.4.2.1. Neurobehavioral and Neurodevelopmental Effects ................................ 31 4.4.2.2. Neurological Effects ............................................................................... 32 4.4.2.3. Hepatic Effects ........................................................................................ 33 4.4.2.4. Cardiovascular Effects ........................................................................... 35 4.4.2.5. Hematological Effects ............................................................................. 36 4.4.2.6. Renal Effects ........................................................................................... 37 4.4.3. Genotoxicity ......................................................................................................... 37 4.5. MECHANISTIC DATA AND OTHER STUDIES ....................................................... 38 4.5.1. In Vitro Studies .................................................................................................... 38 iii 4.5.2. Ex Vivo Studies .................................................................................................... 40 4.5.3. Nanoparticle Studies............................................................................................. 40 4.6. SYNTHESIS OF MAJOR NONCANCER EFFECTS ................................................... 45 4.6.1. Oral ....................................................................................................................... 45 4.6.2. Inhalation .............................................................................................................. 45 4.6.3. Mode-of-Action Information ................................................................................ 46 4.6.3.1. Respiratory Tissues ................................................................................. 46 4.6.3.2. Other Tissues .......................................................................................... 50 4.7. EVALUATION OF CARCINOGENICITY ................................................................... 52 4.7.1. Summary of Overall Weight of Evidence ............................................................ 52 4.7.2. Synthesis of Human, Animal, and Other Supporting Evidence ........................... 52 4.8. SUSCEPTIBLE POPULATIONS AND LIFE STAGES ............................................... 52 4.8.1. Possible Childhood Susceptibility ........................................................................ 52 4.8.2. Possible Gender Differences ................................................................................ 52 4.8.3. Possible Susceptible Populations ......................................................................... 53 5. DOSE-RESPONSE ASSESSMENTS ..................................................................................... 54 5.1. ORAL REFERENCE DOSE (RfD) ................................................................................ 54 5.1.1. Choice of Principal Study and Critical Effect—with Rationale and Justification 54 5.1.2. Previous RfD Assessment .................................................................................... 55 5.2. INHALATION REFERENCE CONCENTRATION (RfC) ........................................... 55 5.2.1. Choice of Principal Study and Critical Effect—with Rationale and Justification 55 5.2.2. Methods of Analysis—Including Models (PBTK, BMD, etc.) ............................ 57 5.2.3. RfC Derivation—Including Application of Uncertainty Factors (UFs) ............... 59 5.2.4. RfC Comparison Information ............................................................................... 61 5.2.5. Previous RfC Assessment .................................................................................... 64 5.3. UNCERTAINTIES IN THE ORAL REFERENCE DOSE (RfD) AND INHALATION REFERENCE CONCENTRATION (RfC) ..................................................................... 64 5.4. CANCER ASSESSMENT .............................................................................................. 67 6. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS IN THE CHARACTERIZATION OF HAZARD AND DOSE RESPONSE ............................................................................................................................. 68 6.1. HUMAN HAZARD POTENTIAL ................................................................................. 68 6.2. DOSE RESPONSE ......................................................................................................... 70 6.2.1. Noncancer/Oral .................................................................................................... 70 6.2.2. Noncancer/Inhalation ........................................................................................... 71 6.2.3. Cancer/Oral and Inhalation .................................................................................. 73 7. REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................ 74 APPENDIX A: SUMMARY OF EXTERNAL PEER REVIEW AND PUBLIC COMMENTS AND DISPOSITION .............................................................................................................. 83 APPENDIX B: BENCHMARK DOSE MODELING RESULTS FOR THE DERIVATION OF THE RFC ................................................................................................................................ 99 iv LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1. Physical properties of cerium and cerium
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Promotion Effects and Mechanism of Alkali Metals and Alkaline Earth
    Subscriber access provided by RES CENTER OF ECO ENVIR SCI Article Promotion Effects and Mechanism of Alkali Metals and Alkaline Earth Metals on Cobalt#Cerium Composite Oxide Catalysts for N2O Decomposition Li Xue, Hong He, Chang Liu, Changbin Zhang, and Bo Zhang Environ. Sci. Technol., 2009, 43 (3), 890-895 • DOI: 10.1021/es801867y • Publication Date (Web): 05 January 2009 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on January 31, 2009 More About This Article Additional resources and features associated with this article are available within the HTML version: • Supporting Information • Access to high resolution figures • Links to articles and content related to this article • Copyright permission to reproduce figures and/or text from this article Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 890–895 Promotion Effects and Mechanism such as Fe-ZSM-5 are more active in the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of N2O by hydrocarbons than in the - ° of Alkali Metals and Alkaline Earth decomposition of N2O in a temperature range of 300 400 C (3). In recent years, it has been found that various mixed Metals on Cobalt-Cerium oxide catalysts, such as calcined hydrotalcite and spinel oxide, showed relatively high activities. Composite Oxide Catalysts for N2O One of the most active oxide catalysts is a mixed oxide containing cobalt spinel. Calcined hydrotalcites containing Decomposition cobalt, such as Co-Al-HT (9-12) and Co-Rh-Al-HT (9, 11), have been reported to be very efficient for the decomposition 2+ LI XUE, HONG HE,* CHANG LIU, of N2O.
    [Show full text]
  • Indium, Caesium Or Cerium Compounds for Treatment of Cerebral Disorders
    Europaisches Patentamt 298 644 J European Patent Office Oy Publication number: 0 A3 Office europeen des brevets EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION © Application number: 88305895.0 © intci.s A61K 31/20, A61K 31/28, A61K 33/24 @ Date of filing: 29.06.88 © Priority: 07.07.87 GB 8715914 © Applicant: EFAMOL HOLDINGS PLC Efamol House Woodbridge Meadows © Date of publication of application: Guildford Surrey GU1 1BA(GB) 11.01.89 Bulletin 89/02 @ Inventor: Horrobin, David Frederick © Designated Contracting States: c/o Efamol House Woodbridge Meadows AT BE CH DE ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE Guildford Surrey GU1 1BA(GB) Inventor: Corrigan, Frank ® Date of deferred publication of the search report: c/o Argyll & Bute Hospital 14.11.90 Bulletin 90/46 Lochgilphead, Argyll PA3T 8ED Scotland(GB) © Representative: Caro, William Egerton et al J. MILLER & CO. Lincoln House 296-302 High Holborn London WC1V 7 JH(GB) © Indium, caesium or cerium compounds for treatment of cerebral disorders. © A method of treatment of schizophrenia or other chronic cerebral disorder in which cerebral atrophy is shown, is characterised in that one or more as- similable or pharmaceutically acceptable indium caesium or cerium compounds is associated with a pharmaceutically acceptable diluent or carrier. CO < CD 00 O> Xerox Copy Centre PARTIAL EUROPEAN SEARCH REPORT Application number European Patent J which under Rule 45 of the European Patent Convention Office shall be considered, for the purposes of subsequent EP 88 30 5895 proceedings, as the European search report DOCUMENTS CONSIDERED TO BE RELEVANT Citation of document with indication, where appropriate, Relevant CLASSIFICATION OF THE ategory of relevant passages to claim APPLICATION (Int.
    [Show full text]
  • AND THORIAN SYNCHYSITE-(Ce) from the NIEDERBOBRITZSCH GRANITE, ERZGEBIRGE, GERMANY: IMPLICATIONS for the DIFFERENTIAL MOBILITY of the LREE and Th DURING ALTERATION
    67 The Canadian Mineralogist Vol. 38, pp. 67-79 (2000) CERITE-(Ce) AND THORIAN SYNCHYSITE-(Ce) FROM THE NIEDERBOBRITZSCH GRANITE, ERZGEBIRGE, GERMANY: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE DIFFERENTIAL MOBILITY OF THE LREE AND Th DURING ALTERATION HANS-JÜRGEN FÖRSTER§ GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Telegrafenberg, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany ABSTRACT A detailed survey of accessory minerals in the poorly to moderately differentiated F-poor biotite granites from Niederbobritzsch, Erzgebirge, Germany, reveals the presence of various, late magmatic to postmagmatic secondary rare-earth (REE) minerals, including cerite-(Ce), thorian synchysite-(Ce), synchysite-(Ce), and an unidentified Th-rich REE fluorocarbonate(?). Cerite-(Ce) is a REE silicate that, to date, has been found in only half a dozen occurrences worldwide. It had not previously been described from a granite. The composition of cerite-(Ce) from Niederbobritzsch is characterized by lower bulk REE contents but higher abundances of Si, Al, Ca, and F than that from other occurrences. Dissolution of thorian monazite- (Ce) during interaction with a F-, CO2- and Ca-bearing fluid gave rise to the formation of thorian synchysite-(Ce) containing up to 18.1 wt% ThO2. Previously reported contents of Th in synchysite-(Ce) did not exceed 1.6 wt% ThO2. The spatial relations between the secondary REE minerals and their precursor attest to a differential mobility of the LREE and Th during fluid–rock interaction. Under the prevailing PTX-conditions, the LREE were more soluble and, thus, mobilized further away from their site of removal relative to Th, which tended to be reprecipitated next to its precursor. Virtually unchanged whole-rock REE budgets and continuous, unfractionated chondrite-normalized LREE patterns of the secondary REE minerals, however, imply that the lanthanides were transported over distances of millimeters or centimeters only.
    [Show full text]
  • Atomic Weights of the Elements 1995
    Atomic Weights of the Elements 1995 Cite as: Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 26, 1239 (1997); https:// doi.org/10.1063/1.556001 Submitted: 02 May 1997 . Published Online: 15 October 2009 T. B. Coplen ARTICLES YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN Atomic Weights of the Elements 1999 Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 30, 701 (2001); https:// doi.org/10.1063/1.1395055 Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 26, 1239 (1997); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.556001 26, 1239 © 1997 American Institute of Physics and American Chemical Society. Atomic Weights of the Elements 1995a) T. B. Coplen U. S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 20192 Received May 2, 1997; revised manuscript received June 13, 1997 The biennial review of atomic weight, Ar~E!, determinations and other cognate data has resulted in changes for the standard atomic weight of 21 elements. The five most significant changes are: boron from 10.81160.005 to 10.81160.007; carbon from 12.01160.001 to 12.010760.0008; arsenic from 74.9215960.00002 to 74.9216060.00002; cerium from 140.11560.004 to 140.11660.001; and platinum 195.0860.03 to 195.07860.002. An annotation for potassium has been changed in the Table of Standard Atomic Weights. To eliminate possible confusion in the reporting of relative lithium isotope-ratio data, the Commission recommends that such data be ex- pressed using 7Li/6Li ratios and that reporting using 6Li/7Li ratios be discontinued. Be- cause relative isotope-ratio data for sulfur are commonly being expressed on noncorre- sponding scales, the Commission recommends that such isotopic data be expressed relative to VCDT ~Vienna Can˜on Diablo Troilite! on a scale such that 34S/32S of IAEA- S-1 silver sulfide is 0.9997 times that of VCDT.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ)
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 04/14/2020 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2020-07794, and on govinfo.gov BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board [B-21-2020] Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 70 – Detroit, Michigan, Notification of Proposed Production Activity, Pacific Industrial Development Corporation (Zeolites, Specialty Alumina Products, Rare Earth Powders and Aqueous Solutions), Ann Arbor, Michigan Greater Detroit Foreign-Trade Zone, Inc., grantee of FTZ 70, submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board on behalf of Pacific Industrial Development Corporation (PIDC), located in Ann Arbor, Michigan. The notification conforming to the requirements of the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR 400.22) was received on April 6, 2020. The PIDC facility is located within FTZ 70. The facility is used for the production of zeolites, specialty alumina products, rare earth powders and aqueous solutions for use in a variety of industries. Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), FTZ activity would be limited to the specific foreign-status materials and components and specific finished products described in the submitted notification (as described below) and subsequently authorized by the FTZ Board. Production under FTZ procedures could exempt PIDC from customs duty payments on the foreign-status components used in export production. On its domestic sales, for the foreign-status materials/components noted below, PIDC would be able to choose the duty rates
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Scanned
    T Hn AMERICax M INERALoGIST JOURNAL OF THE MINERALOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA Vol. 25 JUNE, 1940 No.6 DEPOSITS OF RADIOACTIVE CERITE NEAR JAMESTOWN, COLORADO* Elwnr N. Gonoann aNn Jnwnu J. Gr-ass, IL S. GeologicalSuraey, Washington, D.C. CONTENTS Abstract 381 Introduction 382 Geological occurrence 383 Mineralogy 385 Occurrence.. 385 Northern group 386 Southern group, 391 List of minerals. 393 Cerite... 393 Allanite. 397 Brown epidote 399 Tijrnebohmite 400 Fluorite 4.00 Bastniisite 401 Monazite 401 Uraninite 4Ol Sulphides 402 Comparisons with other deposits of cerite 402 Radioactivity 403 Age determination 404 Assrnecr Cerite, a rare silicate of the cerium metals, occurs in small deposits in the pre-Cambrian rocks of the Front Range near Jamestolvn, colorado. They are near the north border of a stock of Silver Plume granite, to which they are genetically related. Numerous lenticular schist masses in the granite suggest proximity to the roof. The cerite rock containing about 75 per cent of cerite occurs as irregular lenses,one- fourth of an inch to 15 inches wide, in narrow aplite-pegmatite zones along the borders of small schist areas. Narrow veinlets of black allanite border the cerite rock and minute grains of uraninite (pitchblende) and pyrite are localiy present. Microscopic examination of the cerite rock shows it to be finely intergrown with * Published by permission of the Director, Geological Survey, United States Depart- ment of the Interior, the Colorado Geological Survey Board, and the Colorado Metal Mining Fund. 381 E. N, GODDARD AND T. I. GLASS varying amounts of allanite, brown epidote, tdrnebohmite, fluorite, bastniisite, monazite, uraninite, and quartz.
    [Show full text]
  • Uptake of Nanoparticles of Cerium Oxide and Yttrium Oxide by Acanthamoeba Castellanii (Protozoa) and Daphnia Magna (Crustacea) James R
    Virginia Journal of Science Volume 62, 1 & 2 Spring 2011 Uptake of Nanoparticles of Cerium Oxide and Yttrium Oxide by Acanthamoeba castellanii (Protozoa) and Daphnia magna (Crustacea) James R. Palmieri1, Geneva Gehring, Catherine Minichino, and Shaadi F. Elswaifi Department of Microbiology, Infectious, and Emerging Diseases, Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, 2265 Kraft Drive, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA 24060 ABSTRACT Currently, nanoparticles are synthesized and used at an unprecedented rate for industrial, medical, and research applications. The use of cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeONP) and yttrium oxide nanoparticles (YtONP) results in their spread as contaminants into the environment. Once in the environment, CeONP and YtONP can be taken up by organisms in the food chain where they may pose a public health risk. In this study we determine whether Acanthamoeba castellanii and Daphnia magna uptake CeONP or YtONP from their environment and thereby play a role in the transmission of the nanoparticles. Using electron microscopy, organisms exposed to the nanoparticles were examined. Our results indicate that the nanoparticles are associated with cell and organelle membranes. These findings have implications for the health risks associated with environmental contamination by CeONP and YtONP. INTRODUCTION In this study we determine whether protists and crustaceans play a role in the transfer of cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeONP) and yttrium oxide nanoparticles (YtONP) from the environment to other organisms within the aquatic food chain. Acanthamoeba castellanii, a common protist, and Daphnia magna, a planktonic crustacean, are important components in many aquatic ecosystems. Because acanthamoebae, such as A. castellanni, are aggressive feeders they consume inorganic and organic compounds from their environment, thereby serving as a link by transferring normally unavailable inorganic components to the food chain (Weekers et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Stillwellite-(Ce) (Ce, La, Ca)Bsio
    Stillwellite-(Ce) (Ce; La; Ca)BSiO5 c 2001 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1.2 ° Crystal Data: Hexagonal. Point Group: 3: As °at rhombohedral crystals, to 4 cm, and massive. Twinning: Observed about [100]. Physical Properties: Cleavage: One imperfect. Fracture: Conchoidal. Hardness = 6.5 D(meas.) = 4.57{4.60 D(calc.) = 4.67 » Optical Properties: Transparent to translucent. Color: Red-brown to pale pink; colorless in thin section. Streak: White. Optical Class: Uniaxial (+) to biaxial (+). ! = 1.765{1.784 ² = 1.780{1.787 2V(meas.) = 0±{6± Cell Data: Space Group: P 31: a = 6.841{6.844 c = 6.700{6.702 Z = 3 X-ray Powder Pattern: Mary Kathleen mine, Australia. 3.43 (s), 2.96 (s), 2.13 (ms), 4.44 (m), 1.864 (m), 2.71 (mw), 2.24 (mw) Chemistry: (1) (2) (1) (2) (1) (2) SiO2 22.40 22.06 La2O3 27.95 19.12 MgO 0.06 UO2 0.22 Ce2O3 33.15 30.82 CaO 0.95 0.34 ThO2 5.41 Pr2O3 1.82 F 0.30 + B2O3 12.23 [13.46] Nd2O3 5.36 H2O 0.85 Al2O3 0.42 Sm2O3 0.34 H2O¡ 0.10 Y2O3 0.74 0.28 Fe2O3 0.18 P2O5 0.67 Total [100.00] [99.26] (1) Mary Kathleen mine, Australia; recalculated to 100.00% after removal of very small amounts of uraninite and apatite determined by separate analysis. (2) Vico volcano, near Vetralla, Italy; by electron microprobe, B2O3 calculated from stoichiometry, original total given as 99.23%; corresponds to (Ce0:50La0:31Nd0:08Th0:05Pr0:03Ca0:02Sm0:01)§=1:00B1:02Si0:97O5: Occurrence: Locally abundant as a metasomatic replacement of metamorphosed calcareous sediments (Mary Kathleen mine, Australia); in alkalic pegmatites in syenite in an alkalic massif (Dara-i-Pioz massif, Tajikistan).
    [Show full text]
  • Corrosion Protection Mechanisms of Rare-Earth Compounds Based on Cerium and Praseodymium (WP-1618) Objective
    Corrosion Protection Mechanisms of Rare-Earth Compounds Based on Cerium and Praseodymium (WP-1618) Objective Hexavalent chromium containing coatings are widely used to protect U.S. military weapons systems from corrosion, yet present acute health and environmental hazards. This project focused on determining corrosion protection mechanisms for coatings that utilize rare-earth (RE) compounds instead of hexavalent chromium. Understanding the mechanisms by which RE compounds inhibit corrosion would reduce the risk of implementing environmentally friendly coating systems as chromate replacements. Technical Approach Two specific coating systems were examined; cerium-based conversion coatings (CeCCs) and epoxy polyamide primers containing praseodymium-based inhibitors. Prior to the start of the project, both coating systems had demonstrated corrosion protection that could meet current U.S. military requirements for aircraft. The approach taken in this project assumed that RE compounds are not inherently protective. Instead, the appropriate phase of a RE compound has to be incorporated into the proper type of coating to provide corrosion protection in specific environments. As part of the project, mechanistic models for corrosion protection were devised by fully characterizing the phases that were present in as-deposited coatings, the transport processes that occurred during corrosive attack, and the species that formed to passivate the substrates. Results Discovery of sub-surface crevices in substrates with CeCCs led to a significant change
    [Show full text]
  • Interactions of Lanthanides and Liquid Alkali Metals for “Liquid-Like” Lanthanide Transport in U-Zr Fuel
    Interactions of Lanthanides and Liquid Alkali Metals for “Liquid-Like” Lanthanide Transport in U-Zr Fuel THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Jeremy Payton Isler Graduate Program in Nuclear Engineering The Ohio State University 2017 Master's Examination Committee: Dr. Jinsuo Zhang, Advisor Dr. Marat Khafizov, Co-Advisor Copyrighted by Jeremy Payton Isler 2017 Abstract One of the major limitations in achieving increased burnup in metallic U-Zr nuclear fuel is Fuel-Cladding Chemical Interaction (FCCI). The migration of the fission product lanthanides from within the fuel to the peripheral is one of the major contributors to FCCI. A “liquid-like” transport mechanism proposes the lanthanide transport is aided by liquid cesium and liquid sodium in the pores of the fuel and at the fuel peripheral. The purpose of this thesis was to provide additional experimental evidence towards this proposed mechanism. This thesis investigated the interaction between the lanthanides and cesium and sodium, with a focus on the solubility of the lanthanides in these liquid alkali metals. First, a prediction of the solubility was calculated using the Miedema model. This prediction was then compared to the inversion crucible solubility experiment performed in this thesis. The solubility experiment studied the temperature and liquid-composition dependence of the lanthanides in liquid sodium, cesium and sodium-cesium mixtures. In addition, the solubility in mixtures shows the various alkali metals concentration effect on the solubility. With the results of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) experiments, updated phase diagrams for sodium-neodymium and cesium-neodymium were obtained from the experimental data in this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • (Skarn)-Type Ore Deposits in Western Bergslagen,Sweden
    UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG Department of Earth Sciences Geovetarcentrum/Earth Science Centre PREDICTIVE PROSPECTIVITY MAPPING OF RARE EARTH ELEMENTS IN BASTNÄS (SKARN)-TYPE ORE DEPOSITS IN WESTERN BERGSLAGEN,SWEDEN INTEGRATION AND ANALYSIS OF GEOSCIENCE DATASETS IN ARCGIS Ejiro Obotuke-Agbonifo ISSN 1400-3821 B961 Master of Science (120 credits) thesis Göteborg 2017 Mailing address Address Telephone Telefax Geovetarcentrum Geovetarcentrum Geovetarcentrum 031-786 19 56 031-786 19 86 Göteborg University S 405 30 Göteborg Guldhedsgatan 5A S-405 30 Göteborg SWEDEN Table of contents 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 AIM AND APPROACH ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 ABOUT RARE EARTH ELEMENTS .................................................................................................. 7 1.3 GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF BASTNÄS-TYPE REE MINERALIZATION ............................... 9 1.4 MINING HISTORY OF BERGSLAGEN ............................................................................................ 13 2. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................... 15 2.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY OF BERGSLAGEN....................................................................................... 15 2.2 LOCAL GEOLOGY OF BERGSLAGEN ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Earth Elements Deposits of the United States—A Summary of Domestic Deposits and a Global Perspective
    The Principal Rare Earth Elements Deposits of the United States—A Summary of Domestic Deposits and a Global Perspective Gd Pr Ce Sm La Nd Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5220 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover photo: Powders of six rare earth elements oxides. Photograph by Peggy Greb, Agricultural Research Center of United States Department of Agriculture. The Principal Rare Earth Elements Deposits of the United States—A Summary of Domestic Deposits and a Global Perspective By Keith R. Long, Bradley S. Van Gosen, Nora K. Foley, and Daniel Cordier Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5220 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. This report has not been reviewed for stratigraphic nomenclature. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. Suggested citation: Long, K.R., Van Gosen, B.S., Foley, N.K., and Cordier, Daniel, 2010, The principal rare earth elements deposits of the United States—A summary of domestic deposits and a global perspective: U.S.
    [Show full text]