DOCSLIB.ORG

Trypaea Australiensis) in South-Eastern Australia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Trypaea Australiensis) in South-Eastern Australia University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection 1954-2016 University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 2004 Fisheries biology, ecology and recreational harvesting of ghost shrimp (trypaea australiensis) in south-eastern Australia Douglas Rotherham University of Wollongong Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses University of Wollongong Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorise you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this work may be reproduced by any process, nor may any other exclusive right be exercised, without the permission of the author. Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. A court may impose penalties and award damages in relation to offences and infringements relating to copyright material. Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the University of Wollongong. Recommended Citation Rotherham, Douglas, Fisheries biology, ecology and recreational harvesting of ghost shrimp (trypaea australiensis) in south-eastern Australia, PhD thesis, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Wollongong, 2004. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/376 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Fisheries biology, ecology and recreational harvesting of ghost shrimp (Trypaea australiensis) in south-eastern Australia A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY from UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG By DOUGLAS ROTHERHAM, BSc. (Hons) EARTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES 2004 II “Doing what little one can to increase the general stock of knowledge is as respectable an object of life, as one can in any likelihood pursue” Charles Darwin III Dedicated to my wife Leanne and son Lachlan, for the precious time lost. & To my parents, David and Judith Rotherham for a lifetime of support, encouragement and inspiration. IV Thesis Declaration I, Douglas Rotherham, declare that this thesis, submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy, in the School of Earth and Environment Sciences, University of Wollongong, is wholly my own work unless otherwise referenced or acknowledged. The document has not been submitted for qualifications at any other academic institution. Douglas Rotherham 31 August 2004 V Acknowledgements I sincerely thank Associate Professor Ron West from the University of Wollongong for his supervision of the project. Ron has imparted a great deal of knowledge, advice, guidance, inspiration and motivation throughout this research project and during earlier periods of my academic career, for which I am truly indebted. Professor John Morrison (Head of Environmental Science Unit) is also thanked for his support. I am also grateful to the general staff within the Environmental Science Unit at the University of Wollongong for providing logistic support, especially the administrative assistant, Sandra Quinn, as well as professional officers Marina Mcglinn and Mark O’Donnell. Northwest Marine Technology Inc kindly subsidised the cost of ViAlpha and VIE tags thanks to Jan Sanburg and Pete Bergman. Gary Henry (NSW Fisheries) provided unpublished raw data on recreational harvesting of T. australiensis from the National Recreational and Indigenous Fishing Survey, which was greatly appreciated. Paulo Pezzuto is thanked for providing a copy of the REGRANS program for analyses of relative growth. I would also like to thank Dr Charles Gray, Dr James Scandol and Leeanne Raines of NSW Department of Primary Industries (formerly NSW Fisheries), for their support during the final stages of this project. Their flexibility in allowing me to take time off from work commitments was instrumental in the completion of this thesis. My colleagues at NSW DPI are also thanked for their interest and support, especially Julian Hughes, Dr John Stewart and Veronica Silberschnider. VI Thankyou to the field assistants that helped with the collection of samples, namely David & Judith Rotherham, Ray Sloan, Adam Rotherham and Greg Masters. This research would not have been possible without the provision of an Australian Postgraduate Award by the Commonwealth Government of Australia, as well as financial assistance from the School of Earth and Environmental Sciences (formerly the Environmental Science Unit) at the University of Wollongong. Extra special thanks go to my wife Leanne and my son Lachlan for their unconditional love and support, particularly during the times when it all seemed too hard. I could not have done it without you. I look forward to moving on with the next stage of our lives and making up for the many sacrifices that were made during the course of this research, particularly the countless nights and weekends I spent locked away in front of the computer. I also extend many thanks to the rest of my family and friends for their support and encouragement, particularly my brothers Adam and Andrew and in-laws Raymond, Dianne and Michael Sloan. The musical talents of Paul Millar, Adam Rotherham and Hayden Moore helped maintain my sanity and perspective. Finally, I thank my parents David and Judith Rotherham, for providing me with an opportunity to attend university for such a long period of time, which has involved a massive financial commitment. More importantly, I thank them for instilling in me the personal qualities and attributes needed to undertake a PhD and for never allowing me to lose faith in my abilities. Doug Rotherham, 2004 VII Table of Contents Thesis Declaration...............................................................................................IV Acknowledgements................................................................................................V List of Tables .........................................................................................................X List of Figures................................................................................................... XIV List of Plates ..................................................................................................XVIII ABSTRACT...................................................................................................... XIX CHAPTER 1 .......................................................................................................... 1 Introduction........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 General background...........................................................................................................1 1.2 Statement of the problem...................................................................................................3 1.3 Present gaps in knowledge.................................................................................................8 1.4 Thesis objectives..............................................................................................................12 1.5 Thesis structure................................................................................................................13 1.6 Description of the study region........................................................................................15 1.6.1 Coastal and geological environment ........................................................................15 1.6.2 Climate and oceanography.......................................................................................18 1.6.3 Study locations.........................................................................................................19 1.7 Taxonomy of Trypaea australiensis................................................................................26 CHAPTER 2 ........................................................................................................ 30 Comparison of methods for sampling populations of ghost shrimp, Trypaea australiensis.......................................................................................................... 30 2.1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................30 2.2 Materials and methods.....................................................................................................31 2.2.1 Experiment 1: Comparison of core size...................................................................31 2.2.2 Experiment 2: Determination of suction pump effort ..............................................32 2.2.3 Experiment 3: Comparison of catches from coring and suction pumping methods.33 2.3 Results .............................................................................................................................35 2.3.1 Experiment 1:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evolutionary History of Inversions in the Direction of Architecture-Driven
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.09.085712; this version posted May 10, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. Evolutionary history of inversions in the direction of architecture- driven mutational pressures in crustacean mitochondrial genomes Dong Zhang1,2, Hong Zou1, Jin Zhang3, Gui-Tang Wang1,2*, Ivan Jakovlić3* 1 Key Laboratory of Aquaculture Disease Control, Ministry of Agriculture, and State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China. 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 3 Bio-Transduction Lab, Wuhan 430075, China * Corresponding authors Short title: Evolutionary history of ORI events in crustaceans Abbreviations: CR: control region, RO: replication of origin, ROI: inversion of the replication of origin, D-I skew: double-inverted skew, LBA: long-branch attraction bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.09.085712; this version posted May 10, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. Abstract Inversions of the origin of replication (ORI) of mitochondrial genomes produce asymmetrical mutational pressures that can cause artefactual clustering in phylogenetic analyses. It is therefore an absolute prerequisite for all molecular evolution studies that use mitochondrial data to account for ORI events in the evolutionary history of their dataset.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mediterranean Decapod and Stomatopod Crustacea in A
    ANNALES DU MUSEUM D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE DE NICE Tome V, 1977, pp. 37-88. THE MEDITERRANEAN DECAPOD AND STOMATOPOD CRUSTACEA IN A. RISSO'S PUBLISHED WORKS AND MANUSCRIPTS by L. B. HOLTHUIS Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden, Netherlands CONTENTS Risso's 1841 and 1844 guides, which contain a simple unannotated list of Crustacea found near Nice. 1. Introduction 37 Most of Risso's descriptions are quite satisfactory 2. The importance and quality of Risso's carcino- and several species were figured by him. This caused logical work 38 that most of his names were immediately accepted by 3. List of Decapod and Stomatopod species in Risso's his contemporaries and a great number of them is dealt publications and manuscripts 40 with in handbooks like H. Milne Edwards (1834-1840) Penaeidea 40 "Histoire naturelle des Crustaces", and Heller's (1863) Stenopodidea 46 "Die Crustaceen des siidlichen Europa". This made that Caridea 46 Risso's names at present are widely accepted, and that Macrura Reptantia 55 his works are fundamental for a study of Mediterranean Anomura 58 Brachyura 62 Decapods. Stomatopoda 76 Although most of Risso's descriptions are readily 4. New genera proposed by Risso (published and recognizable, there is a number that have caused later unpublished) 76 authors much difficulty. In these cases the descriptions 5. List of Risso's manuscripts dealing with Decapod were not sufficiently complete or partly erroneous, and Stomatopod Crustacea 77 the names given by Risso were either interpreted in 6. Literature 7S different ways and so caused confusion, or were entirely ignored. It is a very fortunate circumstance that many of 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics, Phylogeny, and Taphonomy of Ghost Shrimps (Decapoda): a Perspective from the Fossil Record
    73 (3): 401 – 437 23.12.2015 © Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 2015. Systematics, phylogeny, and taphonomy of ghost shrimps (Decapoda): a perspective from the fossil record Matúš Hyžný *, 1, 2 & Adiël A. Klompmaker 3 1 Geological-Paleontological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria; Matúš Hyžný [hyzny.matus@ gmail.com] — 2 Department of Geology and Paleontology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Mlynská dolina, Ilkovičova 6, SVK-842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia — 3 Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, 1659 Museum Road, PO Box 117800, Gaines- ville, FL 32611, USA; Adiël A. Klompmaker [[email protected]] — * Correspond ing author Accepted 06.viii.2015. Published online at www.senckenberg.de/arthropod-systematics on 14.xii.2015. Editor in charge: Stefan Richter. Abstract Ghost shrimps of Callianassidae and Ctenochelidae are soft-bodied, usually heterochelous decapods representing major bioturbators of muddy and sandy (sub)marine substrates. Ghost shrimps have a robust fossil record spanning from the Early Cretaceous (~ 133 Ma) to the Holocene and their remains are present in most assemblages of Cenozoic decapod crustaceans. Their taxonomic interpretation is in flux, mainly because the generic assignment is hindered by their insufficient preservation and disagreement in the biological classification. Fur- thermore, numerous taxa are incorrectly classified within the catch-all taxonCallianassa . To show the historical patterns in describing fos- sil ghost shrimps and to evaluate taphonomic aspects influencing the attribution of ghost shrimp remains to higher level taxa, a database of all fossil species treated at some time as belonging to the group has been compiled: 250 / 274 species are considered valid ghost shrimp taxa herein.
    [Show full text]
  • OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals
    OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES An Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals By Paul Rudy, Jr. Lynn Hay Rudy Oregon Institute of Marine Biology University of Oregon Charleston, Oregon 97420 Contract No. 79-111 Project Officer Jay F. Watson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 500 N.E. Multnomah Street Portland, Oregon 97232 Performed for National Coastal Ecosystems Team Office of Biological Services Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 Table of Contents Introduction CNIDARIA Hydrozoa Aequorea aequorea ................................................................ 6 Obelia longissima .................................................................. 8 Polyorchis penicillatus 10 Tubularia crocea ................................................................. 12 Anthozoa Anthopleura artemisia ................................. 14 Anthopleura elegantissima .................................................. 16 Haliplanella luciae .................................................................. 18 Nematostella vectensis ......................................................... 20 Metridium senile .................................................................... 22 NEMERTEA Amphiporus imparispinosus ................................................ 24 Carinoma mutabilis ................................................................ 26 Cerebratulus californiensis .................................................. 28 Lineus ruber .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cretaceous Fossils from the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal
    Cretaceous S;cial Publication No. 18 Fossils from the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal A Guide for Students and Collectors Edward M. Lauginiger / /~ / CRETACEOUS FOSSILS FROM THE CHESAPEAKE AND DELAWARE CANAL: A GUIDE FOR STUDENTS AND COLLECTORS By Edward M. Lauginiger Biology Teacher Academy Park High School Sharon Hill, Pennsylvania September 1988 Reprinted 1997 CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION. • 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 2 PREVIOUS STUDIES. 3 FOSSILS AND FOSSILIZATION 5 Requirements for Fossilization 6 Types of Fossilization 7 GEOLOGY •• 10 CLASSIFICATON OF FOSSILS. 12 Kingdom Monera • 13 Kindgom Protista 1 3 Kingdom Plantae. 1 4 Kingdom Animalia 15 Phylum Porifera 15 Phylum Cnidaria (Coelenterata). 16 Phylum Bryozoa. 16 Phylum Brachiopoda. 17 Phylum Mollusca • 18 Phylum Annelida •. 22 Phylum Arthropoda • 23 Phylum Echinodermata. 24 Phylum Chordata 24 COLLECTING LOCALITIES 28 FOSSIL CHECK LIST 30 BIBLIOGRAPHY. 33 PLATES. ••• 39 iii FIGURES Page Figure 1 • Index map of the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal Area. .. .. 2 Figure 2. Generalized stratigraphic column of the formations exposed at the C & D Canal. 11 Figure 3. Foraminifera 14 Figure 4. Porifera 16 Figure 5. Cnidaria 16 Figure 6. Bryozoa. 17 Figure 7. Brachiopoda. 18 Figure 8. Mollusca-Gastropoda. 19 Figure 9. Mollusca-Pelecypoda. 21 Figure 10. Mollusca-Cephalopoda 22 Figure 11. Annelida . 22 Figure 12. Arthropoda 23 Figure 13. Echinodermata. 25 Figure 1 4. Chordata . 27 Figure 1 5. Collecting localities at the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal . ... .. 29 v CRETACEOUS FOSSILS FROM THE CHESAPEAKE AND DELAWARE CANAL: A GUIDE FOR STUDENTS AND COLLECTORS Edward M. Lauginiger INTRODUCTION Fossil collectors have been attracted to Delaware since the late 1820s when the excavation of the Chesapeake and Delaware (C&D) Canal first exposed marine fossils of Cretaceous age (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • First Evidence of the Cretaceous Decapod Crustacean Protocallianassa from Sweden
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 2, 2021 First evidence of the Cretaceous decapod crustacean Protocallianassa from Sweden ELISABETH EINARSSON1, ARON PRASZKIER1 & VIVI VAJDA1,2* 1Department of Geology, Lund University, So¨lvegatan 12, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden 2Department of Palaeobiology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, PO Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden *Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract: An assemblage of the burrowing ghost shrimp, Protocallianassa faujasi, is described, providing the first evidence of this decapod species from Sweden. The fossils occur in succes- sions of the informal earliest late Campanian Belemnellocamax balsvikensis zone at A˚ sen and the latest early Campanian B. mammillatus zone at Ivo¨ Klack, both in the Kristianstad Basin of NE Ska˚ne. Numerous, heavily calcified chelipeds were found within a restricted bed at A˚ sen that was rich in carbonate-cemented nodules. Based on the burrowing lifestyle of modern mud shrimps, we interpret these nodules as infilled burrow chambers. The low abundance of molluscs within the Protocallianassa beds is also consistent with analogous extant communities, indicating that a similar ecologically exclusive relationship ruled within the Late Cretaceous shallow- marine ecosystems. Gold Open Access: This article is published under the terms of the CC-BY 3.0 license. The Kristianstad Basin in the southernmost Swedish represented by sea-urchin spines (Erlstro¨m & Gabri- province of Ska˚ne hosts a richly fossiliferous suc- elson
    [Show full text]
  • Synopsis of the Family Callianassidae, with Keys to Subfamilies, Genera and Species, and the Description of New Taxa (Crustacea: Decapoda: Thalassinidea)
    ZV-326 (pp 03-152) 02-01-2007 14:37 Pagina 3 Synopsis of the family Callianassidae, with keys to subfamilies, genera and species, and the description of new taxa (Crustacea: Decapoda: Thalassinidea) K. Sakai Sakai, K. Synopsis of the family Callianassidae, with keys to subfamilies, genera and species, and the description of new taxa (Crustacea: Decapoda: Thalassinidea). Zool. Verh. Leiden 326, 30.vii.1999: 1-152, figs 1-33.— ISSN 0024-1652/ISBN 90-73239-72-9. K. Sakai, Shikoku University, 771-1192 Tokushima, Japan, e-mail: [email protected]. Key words: Crustacea; Decapoda; Thalassinidae; Callianassidae; synopsis. A synopsis of the family Callianassidae is presented. Defenitions are given of the subfamilies and genera. Keys to the sufamilies, genera, as well as seperate keys to the species occurring in certain bio- geographical areas are provided. At least the synonymy, type-locality, and distribution of the species are listed. The following new taxa are described: Calliapaguropinae subfamily nov., Podocallichirus genus nov., Callianassa whitei spec. nov., Callianassa gruneri spec. nov., Callianassa ngochoae spec. nov., Neocallichirus kempi spec. nov. and Calliax doerjesti spec. nov. Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 3 Systematics .............................................................................................................................. 7 Subfamily Calliapaguropinae nov. .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution, Discovery, and Interpretations of Arthropod Mushroom Bodies Nicholas J
    Downloaded from learnmem.cshlp.org on September 28, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Evolution, Discovery, and Interpretations of Arthropod Mushroom Bodies Nicholas J. Strausfeld,1,2,5 Lars Hansen,1 Yongsheng Li,1 Robert S. Gomez,1 and Kei Ito3,4 1Arizona Research Laboratories Division of Neurobiology University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 USA 2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 USA 3Yamamoto Behavior Genes Project ERATO (Exploratory Research for Advanced Technology) Japan Science and Technology Corporation (JST) at Mitsubishi Kasei Institute of Life Sciences 194 Machida-shi, Tokyo, Japan Abstract insect orders is an acquired character. An overview of the history of research on the Mushroom bodies are prominent mushroom bodies, as well as comparative neuropils found in annelids and in all and evolutionary considerations, provides a arthropod groups except crustaceans. First conceptual framework for discussing the explicitly identified in 1850, the mushroom roles of these neuropils. bodies differ in size and complexity between taxa, as well as between different castes of a Introduction single species of social insect. These Mushroom bodies are lobed neuropils that differences led some early biologists to comprise long and approximately parallel axons suggest that the mushroom bodies endow an originating from clusters of minute basophilic cells arthropod with intelligence or the ability to located dorsally in the most anterior neuromere of execute voluntary actions, as opposed to the central nervous system. Structures with these innate behaviors. Recent physiological morphological properties are found in many ma- studies and mutant analyses have led to rine annelids (e.g., scale worms, sabellid worms, divergent interpretations.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    The Journal of Threatened Taxa (JoTT) is dedicated to building evidence for conservaton globally by publishing peer-reviewed artcles OPEN ACCESS online every month at a reasonably rapid rate at www.threatenedtaxa.org. All artcles published in JoTT are registered under Creatve Commons Atributon 4.0 Internatonal License unless otherwise mentoned. JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproducton, and distributon of artcles in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publicaton. Journal of Threatened Taxa Building evidence for conservaton globally www.threatenedtaxa.org ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) Short Communication First record of ghost shrimp Corallianassa coutierei (Nobili, 1904) (Decapoda: Axiidea: Callichiridae) from Indian waters Piyush Vadher, Hitesh Kardani, Prakash Bambhaniya & Imtyaz Beleem 26 July 2021 | Vol. 13 | No. 8 | Pages: 19118–19124 DOI: 10.11609/jot.6109.13.8.19118-19124 For Focus, Scope, Aims, and Policies, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/aims_scope For Artcle Submission Guidelines, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/submissions For Policies against Scientfc Misconduct, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/policies_various For reprints, contact <[email protected]> The opinions expressed by the authors do not refect the views of the Journal of Threatened Taxa, Wildlife Informaton Liaison Development Society, Zoo Outreach Organizaton, or any of the partners. The journal, the publisher, the host, and the part- Publisher & Host
    [Show full text]
  • Burrowing and Feeding Ecology of the Ghost Shrimp Biffarius Arenosus (Decapoda: Callianassidae)
    BURROWING AND FEEDING ECOLOGY OF THE GHOST SHRIMP BIFFARIUS ARENOSUS (DECAPODA: CALLIANASSIDAE). Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Victoria University of Technology by Fiona Louise Bird B.Sc. (Hons) Department of Biological and Food Sciences Faculty of Science Victoria University of Technology November, 1997 THESIS 595.3887 BIR 30001005348901 Bird, Fiona L Burrowing and feeding ecology of the ghost shrimp Biffarius arenosus Frontispiece Bijfarius arenosus 11 DECLARATION The research in this thesis has not been previously submitted for a degree or diploma in any University. The thesis contains no material that has been previously published or written by another person, except where due reference is made in the thesis itself. FIONA L. BIRD ni ABSTRACT The thalassinidean ghost shrimp, Biffarius arenosus (Decapoda: Callianassidae), is a dominant component of coastal soft sediment communities in temperate south-eastern Australia. This thesis investigated the burrowing and feeding ecology of a population of shrimps inhabiting an intertidal sandflat in Western Port, Victoria. Biffarius arenosus constructs dynamic, unlined burrows with a complex shape indicating that the shrimps exploit the subsurface food supply. A multiple stable isotope study revealed that the food source was sedimentary organic matter, primarily derived from decomposing seagrass and seagrass epiphytes. Feeding and burrowing activity of the shrimps resulted in comparatively larger particles being ejected from burrows to the sediment surface. An investigation of the impact of burrowing and feeding activity on physiochemical and microbial properties of the sediment revealed that the burrow wall sediments were relatively more oxidised (measured via platinum redox electrodes) and had higher microbial enzyme activity rates (quantified via the hydrolysis of fluorescein diacetate) than surrounding subsurface sediments.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonbreeding Eastern Curlews Numenius Madagascariensis Do
    Division of Comparative Physiology and Biochemistry, Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology Nonbreeding Eastern Curlews Numenius madagascariensis Do Not Increase the Rate of Intake or Digestive Efficiency before Long‐Distance Migration because of an Apparent Digestive Constraint Author(s): Yuri Zharikov and Gregory A. Skilleter Source: Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, Vol. 76, No. 5 (September/October 2003), pp. 704-715 Published by: The University of Chicago Press. Sponsored by the Division of Comparative Physiology and Biochemistry, Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/376427 . Accessed: 04/11/2015 23:25 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press and Division of Comparative Physiology and Biochemistry, Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Physiological and Biochemical Zoology. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 23.235.32.0 on Wed, 4 Nov 2015 23:25:52 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 704 Nonbreeding Eastern Curlews Numenius madagascariensis Do Not Increase the Rate of Intake or Digestive Efficiency before Long- Distance Migration because of an Apparent Digestive Constraint Yuri Zharikov1,* Introduction Gregory A.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods Collecting Axiidea and Gebiidea (Decapoda): a Review 5-21 Ann
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien Jahr/Year: 2015 Band/Volume: 117B Autor(en)/Author(s): Dworschak Peter C. Artikel/Article: Methods collecting Axiidea and Gebiidea (Decapoda): a review 5-21 Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien, B 117 5–21 Wien, Jänner 2015 Methods collecting Axiidea and Gebiidea (Decapoda): a review P.C. Dworschak* Abstract Axiidea and Gebiidae (formerly treated together as Thalassinidea) have a crypic lifestyle. Collecting these shrimp therefore requires special field methods. The present paper reviews these methods according to habitats and provides recommendations as well as data on their efficiency. In addition, information on the preservation of these animals is presented. Key words: Thalassinidea, Axiidea, Gebiidea, method, collecting, preservation Zusammenfassung Maulwurfskrebse aus den zwei Unterordungen der zehnfüßigen Krebes Axiidea und Gebiidea (früher zusammengefaßt als Thalassinidea) kommen in temperaten, subtropischen und tropischen Meeren vor und zeichnen sich durch ein Leben im Verborgenen aus. Viele Arten legen tiefe und ausgedehnte Bauten an. Diese Lebensweise erfordert eigene Methoden, um die Krebse zu fangen. Die verschiedenen Fangmethoden werden hier vorgestellt und Angaben zur Effizienz gemacht. Zusätzlich werden Angaben zur Fixierung und Konservierung der Krebse präsentiert. Introduction Formerly treated together as the thalassinideans, the infraorders Gebiidea DE SAINT LAURENT, 1979 and Axiidea DE SAINT LAURENT, 1979 represent two distinctly separate groups of decapods (ROBLES et al. 2009; BRACKEN et al. 2009; DWORSCHAK et al. 2012, POORE et al., 2014). They are commonly called mud shrimp or ghost shrimp, although they are only distantly related to true (dendrobranchiate or caridean) shrimp.
    [Show full text]