Ecologyof fheBenng Sea: A Rewcivot RussisrrLiterature
Distributionand Trophic Relationships of AbundantMesopelagic Fishes of the Bering Sea
Ye,l.Sobolevsky MarineBiology Institute, Russian. Academy vf Sciencesof theFar Fast V/adivostok, Russia
T.C.Sokolovskaya, A.A. Salanov, anti I.A. Senchenko Sakhalin ResearchInstitute of Fisheriesand OceanographyrSakhZ'INTRO! Sakhali n, Russia
1NTRODUCTION determinedby weight beforefixation. An index of Previous research in the pelagic realm of the Bering fullness and degreeof digestionwere estimated vi- Sea has clarified distribution and migration pat- suallyy. terns, and resolved some questions concerning the For purposesof discussionin this paperthe epi- abundanceof important commercialfishes Shunt- pelagiczone is the surfacefishing horizon,at 0-200 ov et al. 1988, KVespestadand Traynor 1988, Daw- rn; upperrnesopelagic zone, 200-500 rn; and lov'er son 1989,Bulatov and Sobolevsky1990, Groot and meso pelagic,;i 00-1,000 rn. Margolis 1991,Radchenko 1994, Sobolevsky et al. 1994!, At the same time, these studies showed the RESULTS necessityof conductingsnore detailed researchon the mesopelagicichthyofauna, including questions Mesopelagicfishes in the Bering Seaslay scattered of abundance and many poorly known aspects of at different depthsand do not, f'orm fishable concen- biology. trations. The meso-and bathypelagic fish fauna in- Mesopelagicfishes const,itutea large biomass cludesat least 62 speciesfrom 54 genera and 85 in the Bering Sea1 Shuntovet al. 1993,Radchenko families iBalanov and Il'inskiy 1992t The most 1994!and play an important role in the pelagicfish abundant, families are Myctophidae and Bathy- assemblyas foodcompetitors to commercialfishes, lagidae:Sterrobrachius leucopsarus, S. nannochir, while serving as food objects themselves. Leuroglvssusschmidti, Lampanictus jordani, L. regalia, Bathylagus pacificus. Pseurl<>bathvlagus mi lleri, Lipolagus ochotensis.and Diaplrus tAeta. MATERIALSAND METHODS These two families constitute about 92 ic of the to- For this study we analyzed the results of trawl sur- tal biomass of mesopelagic fishes Table 1 t veysconducted by the PacificResearch Institute of The dominant species is Stenobrachrus leucop- Fisheries and Oceanography TINRO i. Surveys were sarus, with 64": Table1. Biomassand percentageof dominant familiesand species of mesopelagiefish- es in the Bering Sea -1,000 m!. Biomass Thousands Family, species of tons Family: Myctophidae 10,940 75.1 Bathy 1agidae 2,340 16.1 Chauliodontidae 300 2.1 137 0.9 Scopelosauri dao 5.8 Other families 845 100.0 Total 14.562 Species; Stenobrarhi us leucopsarus 9,354 64.2 8 ten obrachr us nannochi r 1,430 9.8 Bothylogus poerftcus 812 5.6 Pseudobrrthylcrgusmilleri 572 3.9 Lcuroglossus schmi dti 535 3.7 Lipolagusochotensis 420 2.9 Chauli odus macouni 300 2.1 Other species 1,138 FigureL Distributionof catchesof northernsmooth- 14,561 100.0 tongue,Leuroglossus schrnidti, in themeso- Total pelogiczone of theBering Sea. An increasein catcheswas obvious over the con- twophases during the day in theupper and lower tinentalslope in thenorthwestern part of the Corn- levelsof the mesopelagiczone Sobolevskyand manderBasin Figure 1!. Thedistribution of catch Sokolovskaya1993!. These are present with certain modificationsfor othermesopelagic species that rise for otherspecies followed a similarpattern Figure to theepipelagic zone at night.Catches usually in- 2h Mostmesopelagic fishes of the BeringSea mi- creasein the upper mesopelagiczone in the morn- gratedaily between meso- and epipelagic zones. As ing anddecrease in the afternoonin the lower a rule,mesopelagic fishes are caught in smallquan- mesopelagiczone, Such variations in thecatch are tities in the epipelagiczone in the eveningand at probablythe resultof thevertical migratory char- mght.This is commonfor L. schrnidti,S. leucops- acterofL. schmidti,S. leucopsorus, and some other arus, L. ochotensis. species. Scrutinyof the daily migrationsrevealed some However,it shouldbe noted that in thedeepwa- detailsof the verticalmigration structure. For ex- ter basinsof the Bering Seain the spring-summer arnple,L. ochotensisrose only to the lower level of period,when the daylightstays much longer, the theepipelagic zone in theevenings. The catches of verticalmigrations have a smalleramplitude arid are not as distinct.This is especiallyobvious for L. schrnidtiwere small in the uppermesopelagic speciesthat migrateto the epipelagiczone: L. zone. l isuallyin the eveningand at night thereis an schmidti,S. leucopsorus,and L, ochotensis.During increasein epipelagiccatches due to migrantsris- this periodthey prefer the upperand lowerrneso- ingto this level. In the second half of night the catch- pelagiczone for mostof the day. esdecrease in theepipelagic zone. The amplitude of Followingare some characteristics of thebiolo- catchesfor differentspecies is high and is deter- gy anddistribution of the moreabundant mcsope- minedmostly by the lengthof verticalmigrations lagic fishes. and availability of food organismsat different Stenobrochius leucopsarue is the mostabundant depths.Catches of L. schmidtr Figure 3! display speciesin the mesopelagiczone of the BeririgSea. Fcolagyof theBering Sea: A Reviewot RossiatiLiterature Figure2. Distributionof metopelagicfishes other than Leurnglnsstts schmidtt, Btesohrachtus leitcopsarus,and B. natinoehrrhart ested itt theBering Beo. In the westernBering Seaits biomassis morcthan tions of L. echmidti are comnion in the areas bor- 9 million tons Table I!. Even though this species dering the continentalslope. Here the catchesare doesnot aggregateto coinmercialfishing concen- largerthan in i,heother parts of'the Bering Sea '.Fig- trations, its catchesincrease significantly overthe ure I!, continentalslope areas, where all sizesare caught In the opensea, fish of all sizesare found in the -13 cm!. The portion of fish migrating to the epi- catches,but the nuinberof feinalesamong large fish pelagiczone at night is not great,and most of the is greater than for males Figure 4i. In areasclose fish rising io this level are small onesmeasuring 8 to the shelf break i.here is a greater percentage of cm or less, Larger fish are caught inostly in the small fish, and this is especially common in the epi- meropelagiczone during the night. pelagiczone Figure hh In the deepwaterareas, how- Stenobrachi its nannochi r has a somewhat scat- ever,the percentageof sinallerfish decreasesand tered distribution. Unlike 8, leucopsarus, they do the catch of mature individuals increases. not rise to the epipelagiczone at night and stayfar- Lipolrtgusochotensia is mostlyfound in the up- ther away from the continentalslope. This species per mesopelagiczone and. partially,in the lower is consideredto stay at depthsof 300-700m Pearcy inesopelagiczone. As all Bathylagidaedo, it hasdis- et al. 1979,Parin andFedorov l981!, sinceall sizes tinct, daily migrations, and doesnot forin concen- are found there -13 cin!. trations, Sinall catcheshave beenregistered in the Leuroglossusschmi dti is distributedevenly over deepwaterareas. The sizes of fishin thecai,ches fluc- the deep parts of the Bering Sca.Local concentra- tuate between 6 and 18 cm. 162 DistributionenclTrophi< Re4 ior Pseudobathylagizsmilleri doesnot rise to the probablybecause most, of the mesopelagic fishes it epipelagiczone. It is mostlya meso-and bathype- feedson gatherat this levelin the daytime. lagicspecies Ress and Kashkinal967!. The larg- Thetrophic relationships of mesopelagicfishes estcatches have been registered in the Commander havebeen studied mostly during the summerand Basin. k'ishes7-20 crn long arefound in the catches; faH Balanovet al, 1994,1995!. Vone of the dataon they most commonlymeasure 13-16 cm. feedingduring the venter has been published, so ChrttLltodus macottru' is a typicalpredator with wethought it necessaryto describe t.he winter food a inuchsmaller biomass than the restof thelisted spectrumin detail, species.Its sizeis larger,ranging from 9 to26 cin In t.he winter, 8-12 groups of food organisms and with inost.individuals ineasuring 14-18cm, havebeen found in the stomachsof the abundant mesopelagicfish species Stertobrachi usleucopsarus, Migrationsfrom the lower to the upper incsopelag- S. nantzochir, and Leuroglossus schmidti !, Thcdiet ic zoneare often observedduring the day.This is of L. schmidti Table2! is morediverse than the dietsof S. leucopsarusand S, nannochir Tables 3 and 4!, In the sumtner,stomachs of S. leucopsarus andS. nannochircontain a largevariety of foods. Thisis a resultof a highamplitude of' daily inigra- 3.0 tionsby those species Pearcy et al. 1979,Gorbaten- ko and Il'inskiy 1991!.These fishes' diets include 24 interzonalspecies of planktonorganisms along wit h epipelagicspecies. The least diversity of food objects in the summeris a characteristicof S. nannoc/iir 1.8 andP. milleri, with four and three prey species,re- spectively Balanov 1994!; these fishes typically in- c 1.2 habitdeep water Willisand Pearcy 1982!. Calanoidaplay an importantpart in thewinter 0 0.6 nutrition of I.. sthmidti, S. leucopsarus,and S. nan- nochir.This has alsobeen observed in the summer. Significantdifferences are found inostly at various depths.Diversity of food items is greatest at depths 00:00 04:00 06:00 12:00 16:00 20:00 of 200-500m Tables2-4!. This is especiallyobvious Time of day in the winter nutritionof I.. schmitfti.Individuals caughtin thecpipelagic zone had the narrowest food Figure3. Dieli ariattun nf Leurngl 40 o 3p 0 20o EOe 10 to 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 Length em! Figure4. Size< rimpust'tionofcatches ofLeuruglussas schmidti t'nthe pelagic zone ufthe Bering Sea. kcofog>oi the BeringSt+i A ReviewoF Russi.in Li erature 16! Continental slope 20 -.e 08 DE tp N tn Deepwaterregions a 20 O k 10 4 6 6 10 t2 14 16 4 6 8 to 12 14 t6 Length cm! Length cm! Figure5. Sizecomposition of Leurngloseus schmidti in continentalslope and deepuater regions of the Bering Sea. sopelagiczone with 17items andthe lower mesope- 500 in, and smallest for L. schmidli at all depths lagic zone with 12 items not counting items found Tables 2-4!, The percentage of empty stomachs for in trace amounts; Table 2!. The basic foods for L. L. schmidti was high 4'k! in the upper and lower schmidti in the epipelagiczone are Calanoida,and mesOpelagieZOnes. S enObrnchiualeuCOpsarusfrOm in the upper mesopelagiczone are Calanoida,Ku- the lower mesopelagiczone had the lowestnumber phausiidae, Hyperiidea, and Coelenterata.. of empty stomachs i 18'A!. The diet of S. leucopsartts in the winter is inost diverse in the epi- and mesopelagic zones Table 3!. DISCUSSION Calanoitla from 34.7'7r in the epipelagic to 84.2'7r in the lower mesope]agic!and Euphausiidae 2,5'7r in As the research shows. rnesopelagic fishes do not the epipelagic zone and 42.5% in the upper mesope- aggregatein harvestable concentrations in the lagic zone! are most important.. Bering Sea. Consequently,ii. is difficult to obtain Calanoida, specifically Calattus cristatus, play largecatche~ of them, With pelagictrawls not built an iinportant part in the nutrition of S. nannochir, for deepwatertrav, ling of small-sizedfishes, in the At depthsof 500-1,000m Calanoidaare nearly the processof trawling most of the fish probablyescape only foods eaten 99.3'/ !. At 200-500 m, stomach from the trawl; if so, estimates of abundance are contents also include species of I',uphausiidae, Hy- biased low. However, basedon the trawl catch analy- periidea,Decapoda, Gammaridea, and Coelentera- sis. we can inake some generalizations about distri- ta. The amount of Coelenterata i 15.6 ir ! in the diet. bution, The catch analysis showsthat the deepwater is substantial, but the other prey contribute little parts of the Beriiig Sea,including the Commander trace to 3.3'< ! to the diet Table 4 L Basin and i,he Shirshov Ridge, are areas v here Among the examined species,in the fall-winter mesopelagicfishes are situated. Usua!ly the maxi- period the index of storiiach fullness was greatest mum catches are recorded over the northern part of f'or S. leucopsarusand S. nrtnnochir at depths of 200- the Shirshov Ridge and the continent,alslope off DistributionandTrophta Relatiarrships ofAbuntl ant it Table 4. Food spectrum for Stenobrachirtsrstrn- rnesopelagicfishes. The first two families are the nochir in the Bering Sea, November 1991- most abundant. Sincethe spatial structure of rneso- January 1992. pelagicichthyofauna is determinedby the distribu- tion of the abundant species,those two play the most "k of stomachs with food at idepthr important part in the functioningof this group. Food items 200-500 m 500-1,000 rn A comparisonof the diversityof mesopelagicfish species Balanov and Il'inskiy 1992irevealed sig- Calanoida 78.6 99.3 nificant similarities and dominance of a small nurn- Calanus cristutus 45.3 3?.3 berof specieswith most of the biomass. In theBering C. plumchrus 1.6 4.0 Sea,S. leucopsaruscontributes about 640r to the Pan uchaeta elongata 0.2 2.2 biomass. In the Okhotsk Sea, L. schmidti accounts Candacta columbia 0.5 10.0 for 70% of the 14.6 million ton biomass, Thus, in Metridia pacifica 0.5 the rnesopelagicichthyofauna a smallgroup of spe- Gaidius sp. 0 2.1 1.2 ciesare dominant.An analogoussituation has been noted in subarctic waters for Lampanycf usj ordarri Eucalanus bun gii 0.2 0 and some other specieslKass and Kashkina 1967, Pleuromamma scutullata 0.8 0,1 Parin and Fedorov 1981l. 0 Heterorabdus tonneri 0.3 Researchshows that vertical distribution of fish Each acta marina 1.3 0 hasits specificfeatures typical for most rnesopelag- Other Calanoida 27.0 44.0 ic fishes that perform active vertical migrations in Eo.phausi idae 0.7 0 northern latitudes Gj@saeterand Kaw aguchi 19801 Thysanoessalongiper 0.7 0 Thc character of the daily vertical migrations de- Hyperiidca 0.3 0 pendsa loton the abundanceof food organisms. es- Parathemisto paci fica 0.2 0 peciallyabundant species like euphausiidsand Scina sp. 0.1 0 calanoids.Species that have a high amplitude rif Decapoda 3,3 0 vertical migrations,such as S. leucopsarrtsand L Garnmaridea 1.0 0 schmidti, have a morediverse diet including epipe- lagicand interzonal food objects, For deepwater spe- Ostracoda 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.7 cies S. nanriochirand P. millerii migrationsusually Conchoecia sp. occurin the upper and lower rnesopelagicregions, 15.6 0 Uoelenterata where there is a much smaller number of food items Mean index of fullness 10. 8 6,2 in their diet. Number of stomachs 298 125 Analysisshows that for abundantrnesopelagic % of stomachs with food 39 62 fishes of the Bering Sea,the dominating food ob- Mean weight of fish Ig> 9.2 9,7 jectsin all seasonsare Calanoidaarid Euphausi- Mean length of fish cm! 9.7 10.0 idae,Other groups Hyperiidea, Ostracoda! are of lessimportance. In the summerperiod Appendicu- laria gain importancein the dietsof Bathylagidae L. schtrridti and L. ochoterrsis!,whereas in the win- CapeOlyutorsk and the CommanderBasin, IIow- ter they consumemore Coelenterata. A similar pat- ever,no significantconcentrations have been dis- tern of feedinghas been notedfor Bathylagidaein covered, This shows that in the Bering Sea the other areas of the Pacific Adams 1979, Gordon et spatial distribution of mesopelagicfishes is more al. 1985 i. even than that of the commercial species walleye All of the foregoingshows hov distinctthe food pollock,herring!, which form aggregations that en- specializationis for the examinedspecies of'meso- ablethe fishing fleet to work efficiently. pelagicfishes, The extracted differences in distri- In the Bering Seafour families Myctophidae, butionand especially in the exterit.of dailyvertical Bathylagidae, Chauliodontidae,and Scopelosau- migrationscertainly affect the diversity of thefood ridae make up the major portionof the biomassof spectrumand choice of dominatingfood objects. 166 Distributionand Frophic Relationships ofAbunc!ant ittesopelagic Fishes orrhe Bering 5ea Parin,N.V and VV. Fedorov.1981 Comparison of REFERENCES deepwaterpelagic ichthyofaunas of the north- Adams,A,E. 1979. The food habits, age and growth westernand northeastern Pacific, In: Biologiya of three midwater fishes Stenobrochius leucop- bol'shikhglubin Tikhogo okeana lBiology of the sarus,S, nannochir,and Leuroglossus schnrid- greatbasins of the PacificOcean j. Vladivostok. ti! from the southeasternBering Sca.M.S. DVNTS [Far Eastern Branchj Akad. Nauk thesis,Univ. Alaska, Fairbanks, 302 pp. SSSR,pp, 72-78. In Russian,! Balanov,A.A. 1994.Nutrition of prevailingrnesope- Pearcy,W,G., II.V. Lorz, and W. Peterson. 1979. Corn- lagicfishes of the BeringSea. Vopr. Ikbtiol, parisonof thefeeding habits of migratoryand 34 !:252-259. In Russian.! non-migratorySrenobrachi us eucnpsarus Myc- tophidae!.Mar. Biol. 51<1i:1-9. Balanov,A.A,, K.M, Gorbatenko,and T.A. Gorelo- va, 1994.Daily dynamicsof nutrition for meso- Radchenko,B.I. 1994. Sostav, struktura i dinamika pelagicfishes of the BeringSea during the nektonnykhsoobshchestv epipelagiali Beringo- surnrnerperiod. Vopr, Ikhtiol, 34 !:534-541, In va morya Composition,structure, and dynarn- Russian. ! ics of nektonic cornrnunitiesin the epipelagic zone of the Bering Seaj. Avtoref. kand. diss. Balanov,A.A., K.M. Gorbatenko, and A.Ya. Efrmkin. ICandidatethesis', Vladivostok, 24 pp. In Rus- 1995.Daily dynamicsof nutrition for mesope- lagic fishesof the BeringSea during the fall sian.! period.Biol. Morya 21! 2!;125-131, In Russian.! Rasa,T.S,, and A.A. Kashkina, 1967. Bathypelagic Balanov,A.A., and Ye.V. Il'inskiy. 1992. Species com- smelts Pisces,Bathylagidae! of the northern positionand biomass ofrnesopelagic fishes of the partsof thePacific Ocean. Tr. Inst. Okeanol. Okhotskand Bering seas. Vopr, Ikhtiol. 32 !;56- Akad. Nauk SSSR84:159-208. In Russia~.! 63. In Russian.! Shuntov,V P.,A.F. Volkov, and AYa, Efrmkin. 1988. Bulatov,S.A., and Ye.I. Sobolevsky. 1990. Distribu- Compositionand abundanceof pelagicfish tion,abundance, and future perspectives of pol- groupsin thewestern Bering Sea. Biol. Morya lockfisheries in the openBering Sea. Biol. Morya 2:56-65. In Russian.! 5:65-72. In Russian,! Shuntov,V.P., V.I. Radchenko, V.I. Chuchukalo, and Dawson,P,K. 1989. Stock identification of Bering others,1993, Composition of plankton and nek- Seawalleye pollock. In: Proceedingsof the In- ton groupsof the upperpelagial of thc.western ternationalSyrnposiurn on BeringSea Fisher- BeringSea and Pacificwaters of Kamchatka ies,July 19-21,1988, Sitka, Alaska, U.S. Dept. duringanadroinous migration of salmon.Biol. Commerce,NOAA Tech. Memo, NWFS F/NWC Morya 4:19-31. In Russian.! 163: 184-206. Sobolevsky,Ye.I., V.I. Radchenko, and A,V. Startsev. Gjissaeter,J and K. Kawaguchi,1980. A reviewof 1994, Distribution and food of churn salmori, the world resourcesof mesopelagicfishes. FAO Oncorhynchuskenya, in thefall-winter period in Fish, Tech. Pap. 193 Rome, 151 pp, the westernBering Sea and Pacificwaters of Kamchatka.Vopr. Ikhtiol. 34 !:35-40. In Rus- Gordon,J.D.M., S. Visida, and T, Nemoto. 1985. The sian,! diet of mesopelagicfishes from the Pacificcoast of Hokkaido.J. Oceanogr.Soc. Jpn. 41 !:89-96. Sobolevsky,Ye.I., V.P. Shuntov, and A.F. Volkov. 1989. Gorbatenko,K,M., and Ye.N,Il'inskiy. 1991.Food Thecoinposition and present state of pelagicfish communities in the western Bering Sea. In: Pro- of abundant.mesopelagic fishes in the Bering ceedingsof the InternationalSymposium on Sea.Vopr. Ikhtio!. 31!5!:816-821. Sobolevsky,Ye.l and T.G, Sokolnvskaya, 1993. New data on northern smoot!itongue, Leuroglossus schmidt Bathylagidaei,biology in the north- westernPacific. Vopr. Ikhtiol. 33 !:780-784,iln Russi an. ! Wespestad,V.G., and J.J, Traynor,1988. Walleye pollock. In: Condition of groundfish resources of the easternBering Seaand Aleutian Islands regionin 1988,Int. N. Pac,Fish, Comm. Doc, 3345, pp. 17-40. Willis,J.M., and W.G. Pearcy, 1982. Vertical distri- bution and migration of fishesof the lower zone of Oregon.Int. N. Pac. I"ish, Comm.Bull. 70 !:87-98. Ecologyot theBarite S< at A Reviewot RussianLiterature StockDynamics ofWestern Bering Sea Herring N.I. Natjmenko KamchatkaResearch Institute of Fisheriesand Oceanography KarnchatiVIROJ Petropavloosk-Kamchatski,Russia. ABSTRACT thesepopulations were divided into three groups; This work examinesthe distribution, dynamicsof Northern,Central, and Southern Barton 1978, abundanceand catches, and the fluctuationsof year- Friedand Wespcstad 1985, Rowell 1980, Walker and classstrength of the Korf-Karaginherring. Schnepf1982, Rogers et al, 1984,Rogers and Theentire life cyde of herring occurson the con- Schnepf 1985!. tinental shelf of the westernBering Sea, where they In addition to the above populations, another spawn,forage, and undertake wintering migrations. stockof marine herring reproducesin the Gulf of Thesize of the Korf-Karaginherring year classesis Anadyr.The biomassof this stockis noticeably subjectto substantialfluctuations with a dominant smaller than the other two. periodicityof years. Herring reached their maximum Several lake-lagoonherring stocks have been biomassin the late 1950s.At that time, the biomass observedin the Bering Sea Prochorov1965, Mak- of inature fish exceeded400,000 tons. Stockshave sirnenkov1979!, They inhabit baysand lagoonsbe- been depresse.din the last 30 years. tweenCape Olyutorsk and Cape Navarin, including Anastasia,Dezhnev, and Expedition bays, and Uzh- naya Lagoon. INTRODUCTlON Severalpopulations of Pacificherring Clupeapal- MATERIALSAND METHODS /asi! inhabit the far-easternseas of Russia.Biologi- cally,they are divided into lake-lagoon herring and Since 1958,many interdisciplinary observations marineherring. Lake-lagoonor coastalherring win- havebeen carried out to elucidatethe biologicalcon- ter andreproduce in lagoonsand salt, lakes. They ditionof' herring and estimate their stocksize. The feedin neighboringbays and do not migrate very researchwas conducted in spring,summer, and fall. Spawningwas monitored during May from hr.- far. Marine herring, on the other hand, spendmost licopters.The spawningdates and areaswere de- of their lives far from shore. The coastal portion of terrnined,and sizeof'the spawmngareas estimated. their life cycleis limited to the spawningperiod. Duringlow tide immediatelyfollowing major repro- Marineherring undergo prolonged spawning, feed- ductive events, the substratum with eggs was ran- ing,and wintering migrations. Soinetiines they mi- domlysampled. The sample area is 20crn x 20cm. grate500-900 miles from their spawninggrounds, At least, 10 such samples were collected in each Thereare two particularlylarge stocks of ma- spawningarea. The number of eggs in the samples rine herringin the BeringSea: the Korf-Karagin was countedand the density of depositionon each andeastern Bering Seastocks, The former is a sin- spawningsite wasestimated, along with the aver- glepopulation, without any discrete local or seasonal agedeposition density on all spawningsites, taking groupings Panin l950, Prochorov1965, Kachina their size into consideration.The total number of 1981!.The structure of the easternBering herring eggsspawned by all femaleswas determined by mul- stockis muchmore complex. There are ninemajor tiplyingthe averagedensity hy the total spaivning spawningpopulations managed for commercial fish- area. erieson the easternBering Seacoast of Alaska Row- Concurrentlywith the abovestudies, rneasure- ell 1991!. Based on a number of characters scales rnentsand biological analyses were done on herring andage structures, growth rate, spawning dates! taken in seinesset near the spawning grounds. 170 Stock Dynsniics of LVesternBering Sea Herring These collections allowed us to determine size, age, and sexcornposit.ion of the spawningstock, and es- timate the average fecundity and weight of the fish. The number of feinales was estimated by divid- ing thetotal amountof eggsat. the spawninggrounds by the averagefecundity per feniale,after whichthe total number of spawners were estimated from the sex ratio. Seven days after the major hatching event usu- ally between 1 June and 20 June!, larval surveys were done.These surveys allowed us to estimate the number of larvae and determine herring survive.l during embryogenesis and during the first seven days following hatching. Standard biostatistical data were collected from commercial catches in Olyutorsk Bay during the fall fishery. In addition, trawl surveyswere undertak- en in the Karagin and Olyutorsk regions in Novem- Figure I. Distribiition and migrationsof Korj'-Karagin ber to estimate the strength of the current year class. herring in the yearsof high Ai and loie tB! This permitted us to estimate survival during the year classstrength. I! spau;ningarena, !2! transition from larval to 0 age cia.ssjuveniles ap- spaiuning migrations, i feedi ng mi gratinn ~, J u!i nteri ng migrations, J feeding areas,!6'! proxirnately 5 months!. wi nteri ng areas. Herring abundance and the age class before 19o8were estimated by virtual population analysis VPA!. m. The major purse seine fishery occurs at this time. The schools move to greater depth in late Novem- RKSUITS AND DISCUSSION ber-earlyDecember and continue moving westward. They usually reachtheir traditional overwintering Distributionand migrations area to the southeast of Cape Goven by the middle Spawningmigrations of the Korf-Karaginherring of Deer mber. usually beginin the secondhalf'of April. In yearsof Juvenile Korf-Karagin herring do not co-occur high spawningstocks, they movedto the spawning with adult firh. They spend the first two years of groundsin three major migration routes.In years their lives in Karagin Bay and the third year in the of low abundance, they moved in two major migra- Olyutorsk Bay, tion routes Figure 1!. Spawningoccurs in May,in the shallowbays and Conditionand stock dynamics lagoonsof nort,bernKaragin Bay and in KorfBay. The numberof' spawning areas has significantlyde- Spawningstocks and commercialstocks are regu- clined in the last 25 years, The herring use prirnari- lated annually in the western Bering Sea, The ly Zosteraas a substratumfor eggdeposition, former consist of all the mature fish; the latter in- Right after spawning, the mature fish leave cludes all the fish, including juveniles, that have Karagin Bay and migrate to the foraginggrounds reached a length of 25 crn 126 crn according to the between Cape Olyutorsk arid Cape Navarin, The Smith measurement technique!, the recruitment duration of the migration dependson the sizeof the length established by Russian Federation Fishery stock: as the number of the spawners increases,the Regulations, Cornrnercial stock are believed to con- area of the foraging zoneextends eastward. In some sist of fish that are 4 years old and older. yearsthe Korf-Karaginherring reach 178'E, Her- The spawning stock was estimated by the egg ring stocksforage in OlyutorskBay during periods survey method in all the spawmng areas. Commer- of extremely low abundance.The foraging period cial stock were estimated from spawning stocks, usually last,s4 to 5 months. taking recruitment, mortality, maturation and I'he winter migration moves in the opposite di- growth rates into consideration. rection,usually in September-November.Returning The observations encompass 57 years, from I9S7 to OlyutorskBay, the herringspend 20-50 days in to 1993. Substantial variation in size of the spawn- the eastern area at relatively shallow depths, 40-90 ing stocks has occurred over these years, ECO/OgyOfthe Bering5ea A RevieivOt RuSSian literature 171 and 1,5 x 10s Kachina 1981 k The decline in repro- ductive potential to less than half of the optimum has caused a disruption in the stock-recruitment ratio, All the above featurer of spawning stock dynarn- ics arealso present, in the commercialstocks. They reached rnaxirnum size in 1956-1957, The overall CI commercial stock is 1.7 times greater than the 2 c spawning stocks. I~ 50 I ala '~ 55555459555 Yearclass strength Z Somevariation in year class strength is inherent in aII the marine herring inhabiting the North Pacific. Most researchers have documented a periodicity of about 5 years and longer, equivalent to two solar cycles Prochorov1965; Birman 1973;Turnin and Yelkin 1977; Kachiria 1981; Naumenko 1984, 1990; Naumenko et al. 1990!. Similar periodicity has been observedin both 040 5550 lj560 5lln 5'~ 550 Italo the Bering Sea and Okhotsk Sea herring. Never- rIR1 theless, short-term cycles are unstable and can be broken. The common feature of all three of the above Figure2, Commercial A anrt sporoiring BJ stocks of herringstocks is a relativelystrict 5-yearperiodici- Korf-Karagi n herring. ty in yearclass strength in yearswith high and av- eragespawning potential and the absenceof stable cyclesin years with low potential, Thefirst 18years 937-1954! canbe considered Estimates of recrriitrnent to the Korf-Karagin a periodof averageabundance Figure 2!, charac- herringfishery is basedon abundanceof age4 fish terized by relatively stable age-sizecomposition, sex i.e., the ageat which they enter the fishery!. The ratio, abundance, and biological condition of the entire researched period can be dixdded into four s pawnera. The total numberof spawnersduri ng this intervals, baserl on year-class strength in the popu- periodvaried from 7 x 10'to 1.5 x 10'individuals, lation under study. and their biomass was 2 to 5 x 10' tons, The first intervaL covers 18 years from 1928 During the next ten years 955-1964! the Kara- through 1945.It is characterizedby averageyear gin herring stockabundance remained at, a highlev- class abundance and moderate amplitudes in year el. In these years, the population experienced class fluctuations, In the first, three years 928- significant changes,Due to a few exceptionally 1930i the number of 4-year-old fish was fairly low, strongyear classes,the numberof spawnersrapid- 7 x 10' to 1.7 x 10' Figure 3 t In the f'ollowing 15 ly increasedand by 1957reached the historical rnax- years 931-1945! the year class strength stabilized imum, 3.4 x 10" fish or 735,000 tons. Fluctuations at 2 x 10' to 1,2 x 10" fish. Already during this 18 in biologicalfactors becamemore obvious.Strong year period a.definite five year periodicity in year differences in year class strength occurred. Except class strength was noted, Highest year class for the last two years of this period, the number of strengthoccu.rred during the followingyears: 1931- spawnersexceeded 10" individuals. 1932,1937-1939, and 1943-1945.However, strict pe- From 1965 to the present, western Bering Sea riodicity was not observedduring this period.The herring stocks have been low. The distinguishing averagenumber of 4-year-oldrecruits during the feature of this period has been a maximum ampli- first research interval v'as about 6.25 x 10'. tude in the fluctuations of all biological indices char- The next 1» years in the history of the Korf-Kara- acterizing reproductionpotential. The number of gin herringfishery represent a classicexample of a spawnersduring this 29 year period has varied from strict cyclicrecurrence in year-classstrength. The 2.4 x 10' to 6 x 10', and their biomass has ranged periodicitywas as follows: strong year classesoc- f'rom 6,000 to 175,000 tons. curred in the 1st-3rd and 6th-8th years of a decade, The optimum number of mature fish in the stock pooryear classes occurred in the 4th, 5th, 9th. and for expanded reproduction is somewhere between 1 10thyears, i,e two v eakyear classesfollovved three StockDynam!cs of WesternHt ring Sea Herring oe o u u o u E Z 0 Figure3. Ahundanceof the 4-year-oldcohort of Korf- Karogin herring. ! strongyear class, ! ao- erage, ! ueak year c/ass. strongones. In additionto the strict periodicityin 1946-1960, the absolute maximum year class strengthwas achieved, averaging about 1.1 x 10'fish. Year In 1961the populationstarted to declineand wassoon quite depressed. For 11years 961-1971, Figure4. Russiancatches ufherring in the.Far-Easterri 3rd interval! the stockretained its 5-year periodic- seas. I! Sakhatin-Hokkaido, ! Okho sk, ! ity of strongyear classes alternating with weaker KorfKaragi n, ! Ciizhiginsky-Kamchatka, I ones. However, the stronger classesappeared once EaSternBering, ! Peter the Great Bay, ! or twicein five yearsand absoluteabundance was Dekastrtnsky. nothigh, 3.6 x 10"to 1.0x 10'individuals. The aver- agerecruitment, to the commercialstock was a lit- tle over 2.5 x 10 individuals. From 1972to the present th pcriodl, the re- Beringmarine herring!, and relativelylow Peter productiveoutput has been low. The 5-year cycle of the Great Bay and Dekastrinsky!,The averagean- strongyear classes has also been broken. Year class nua] harvest from the erst category was 90,000- strengthof over2 x10' fish occurredwith a period- 120,000tons, the secondwas 21,000-34,000 tonr, icity ofeight years during the 1970sand 1980s. The and the third was 6,000-7,000 tons Figure 1!. averagenumber of recruitsduring the last interval Froin 1921 to 1992 the total annual herring has decreasedby 1.7tiines comparedto the preced- catchin the far-easternseas has fluctuated greatly ing interval,and was only 1.5x 10'fish. Figure4!. Twice,in 1931and 196S-1969,catches exceeded500,000 tons. In the first case,the high commercialtake was due to increasein catchesof Fishery Sakhalin.-Hokkaidostocks, and in the seconddue Amongmarine herring stocks inhabiting the Japan, to rnaxiinurncatches of Okhotskherring. But there Okhotsk,and Bering seas, the followingsustained havebeen years when the domesticcommercial fish- a significantfishery for Russia: Petro Velikogo Bay ery tookless than 100,000tons; 1937-193S, 1946- herring, Dekastrinsky, Sakhalin-Hokkaido, 194S,1976-1982, and 1989-1990. Okhotsk. Gizhiginsky-Kamchatka,Korf-Karagin, Beginningin the 1960s,the total catch of Pacif- and Eastern Bering stocks. ic herringhas depended on the Okhotsk stock. which Basedon commercialstatistics, these popula- makeup an averageof 70%of the annual catch. tions are clearly separatedinto three categories: During the entire 72 year observationperiod populationswith abundance,bioinass, and conse- 921-1992 l, the Russian fishery has taken about quent.catch levels t,hat are high Sakhalin-Hokkaido16 million tons of Pacific herring, averaging 221,000 and Okhotsk', medium Korf-Karagin, Eastern tons annually. ECOIOgt:of the eri g Sea:A RC'VieWOtRt 5!a L tera urn 773 Table 1. Russiancatches of herring in the Par-Eastern seas Figure 1! 1921-1992 in thousandtons!. Totalfishing period lntensive fish> ng period Total Avg.yearly hfarr.catch Total catch Avg. yearly catch, catch, Years No yrs. Years No.yrs andyr. intensiveyrs. catch all vrs. all yrs. Sskhslrn-Hokkaido '?-1992 72 1921-1959:39 595 931! 6,511 167 6,657 Okhotsk 1945-1992 48 1945-1992 48 380 9691 5,716 119 5,716 119.1 Eorf-Karagin 1939-1968, 46 1953-1968 16 196 961 1,217 76 1,549 :3'3.7 1977-1992 Gizhiginsky- 1937-1973, 44 1955-1973 19 161 9581 740 39 911 20.7 Karrrchatka 1986-1992 Ea atern Ber i ng 1959-1980 22 1959-1976 18 92 9691 556 31 572 26.0 Dekastrinsky 1926-19'36, 46 1926-1936 11 26 9291 161 16 287 6.3 1965-1971, 1982-1992 Ycter thc Great 13ay v-1936, 46 7-193o 107 25 926! 190 19 246 7.0 1965-1969, 1975-1988 Coinmercial exploitation of the Korf-Karagin herring began in 1939, In the first year of fishing about 5,000 tons were taken Figure 5!. Over the next 15years, through 1953, herring was taken only with passivegear herring weirs! during the short sr r period when the spawners were near shore for spawningin KaraginBay, Catches slowly grew and IO in 1953 the catch was 21,500 tons, .illnetting on 0 foraging schools was introduced to the fishery in O 1954,the fall purseseine fishery was begun in 1958, IO and the winter trawl fishery v as started in 1959. ~ oa Japan also joined the Korf-Karagin herring fishery in 1961.The Japanesecaught pre-spawni ng herring with nets, putting enormous amounts of gear in the path of the spawning migrations. The Korf-Karagin herring fishery was the most valuable in the northwestern Pacific in 1960-1966. ISIS lsar rssrr iszo % r I99 r The total annual catch USSR and Japanl during Year this period exceeded100.000 tons, with the maxi- rnum in 1961 at 268,000 tons, During the eight year Figure 5, Total USSR und Japan! catrhes nf Korf- period from 1959 to 1966, herring fishing was done Kuragin herring. !3! rSSIK, sernes, hy, ! all year long, In the late 1960s the herring catch USSR, seiries, Sep ,-¹r., r'3! USSR, gr'linet, rapidly decreased,despite thc constant increasein 3 USSR, trarols, iVot.-Afar<.h, J Japan, fishing effort, and by the end of the decadethe fish- gil/rte , Apr. Vay. ery was suspendedfor economicreasons. Fishing was suspended in 1970 and was not completely re- opened unt.il 1986. Exploitation of Karagin herring at much lov er levels began again in 1977, Low catch quotas re- mained in efIect in the 198Os;only 8,000-32,000 tons were caught. The fishery was closed in 1992 and 1993 for two reasons: the relatively low reproductive potential StockDynatnics oi tVesternOenng Sei Herring 174 Fried,S,M., and VG, Wespestad.1985. Productivi- andto protectthe juveniles of two strong year cl ass- ty of Pacificherring Clupea horengus pailasi! es, 1987and 1988,from the fishery. in the eastern Bering Sea under various pat- terns of exploitation.Can. J, 1'ish,Aquat. Sci. CoNCI USION 42 Supp.1!:181-191. Overa half-centuryof researchon herringin the Kachina,T.F. 1981, Seld' zapadnoy chasti Beringo- westernBering Sea allows us to concludethe fol- va morya.lThe westernBering Sea herring.J lowing: Pishch. Prornst., 121 pp. 1. Theentire bfe cyde of herringoccurs on t,he con- Maksimenkov,V V. 1979. Differentiation of juvenile tinentalshelf. They undergo spawrung, feeding, Bering Sea herring Clupea pa tlasi paltosi' Val.!. and wintering migrations.The durationand rangeof the feeding migrations depends on the TINRO, Vladivostok 10:111-118. size of the stock. Naurnenko,N.I. !984,Numerical dynamics of the easternBering Sea herring, Candidate's thesis 2. Herringabundance has varied greatly through- in biologicalscience. VNIRO, Moscow, 23 pp. out the yearsof observations,from the average levelin the 1940s,to highlevels in thelate 1950s Naurnenko,N.I. 1990,The reasonsfor Long-term andearly 1960s,and low in the last 30 years. depressionofKorf-Karagin herring stocks. Bio- Thelargest spawning stock was observed in logicheskieresursy shel'fouykh i okrainnykh 1957when there were 3.4 x 10'fishes or 735,000 rnoreySSSR. [Biological resources ofthe shelves tons.The smallest stock levels were recorded in andmarginal seas of the UhSR,] Nauka Press, 1969 at 2.4 x 10' fish or 6,000 tons, Moscow,pp, 139-148, 3, Five-yearalterations of strongand weak year' Naurnenko.N.I., P.A. Balykin, Ye,A. Naumenko, and classesoccurred in yearsof averageand large E.R.Shaginyan. 1990. Long-term changes in the stocksize. This cycle was disrupted in yearswith ichthyofaunaof the westernBering Sea, Izv, depressedstocks and a neweight-year cycle Tikhookean,Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Rybn.Khoz, developed. Okeanogr, TINRO! 111:49-57. 4. Russiancatches of herringin the far-eastern Panin,K,I, 1950.Materials on the biologyof her- seasin the 1920s-1980svaried from 40,000to ringgon the northwestern Kamchatka coast, Izv. 520,000tons. They werehighest in the Late Tikhookean.Nauchno-Issled. Inst, Rybn.Khoz. 1920s-early1930s and in the late 1960s.In Okeanogr. TINRO! 32:3-36, termsof the sizeof the catch,the Korf-Karagin herringis third,aA,er the Okhotsk and Sakha- Pravotorova,E,P, 1965. Biological data on Gizhigin- lin-Hokkaidostocks, During the entire history sky-Kamchatkaherring related to fluctuations of the commercialfishery 939-1992!,over 1,5 in abundanceand changes in feedingarea. Izv. million tons has been harvested, averaging Tikhookean.Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Rybn.Khoz, 34,000 tons per year. Okeanogr. TINRO! 59:102-126. Prochorov,V.G, 1965, Topatsky herring. Voprosy RFFERENCES GeografiiKamchatski 3:115-116. Barton,L.H. 1978,Finfish resourcesurveys in Norton Soundand KotzebueSound. U.S. Dept. Rogers,D E.,and K.N. Schnepf. 1985. Feasibility of Commerceand U.S. Dept.Interior Environmen- usingscale analysis methods to identifyBering talAssessment ofthe Alaskan Continental Shelf. Seaherring stocks. Fisheries Research Institute Final Report,Biological Studies 4;75-313, Univ. Washington,Annual Report FRI-UW- 8501, Seattle. 48 pp. Birman,I.B, 1973.Solar-hydrographic interactions asa basisfor long-term stock predictions in com- Rogers,D.E,, N.N, Schnepf, and P,R. Russell 1964. mercialfisheries e.g.salmon and herring!, Vopr. Feasibilityof using scale pattern analysis meth- odsto identifyBering Sea herring stocks, Fish- Ikhtiol. 13 I!:23-37. Ecologyor the BeringBed: A Revicvvo Russianliterature eries Research Institute Univ. Washington, An- nual Report FRI-UW-8402, Seattle, 47 pp. Rowell,K.A. 1980,Separation of spawningstocks of Bering Sea herring basedon scalegrowth patterns,In: Proceedingsof the AlaskaHerring Symposium.Univ. Alaska SeaGrant Report80- 04, Fairbanks, pp. 262-263. Rowell, K.A., H.J. Geiger, and B.G. Rue. 1991.Stock identification of Pacific herring in the eastern Bering Seatrawl bycatch and in the Dutch Har- bor food and bait fishery. Proceedingsof the In- ternational Herring Symposium. Univ. Alaska SeaGrant Report 91-01, Fairbanks, pp. 255-278. Tyurnin, B,V and E.I. Yelkin. 1977.Some biologi- cal factors regulating the Okhotsk Sea herring fishery. Rybn. Khoz. 4:14-17. Walker, R.V and K.Ã. Schnepf. 1982. Scalepattern analysisto estimatethe origin of herring in the Dutch Harbor fishery, Fisheries ResearchInsti- tute Univ. Washington, Final Report FRI-UW- 8219, Seattle. 47 pp. Ecologyof thi BeringSea; A Reviewof RussianLiterature Dynamicsand Abundance ofWestern 6eringSea Walleye Pollock P.A.Balykin KamchatkaResearch Institute of Fisheriesand Oceanography KamchatNIRO! Petropai:/oisk-Kamchatski, Russia, ABSTRACT ing ground locatedat about the samelatitude as This paperreviews and summarizesinformation on DezhnevBay. Reproduct,ionstarts at the end of pollockabundance, catch, and year-class strength March,and the peakof egg-depositionis in early to within the Russian exclusive econoinic zone in the mid-May, depending on the water temperature Bering Sea.Western Bering sea pollock stocksin-