Eating and Drinking Condemnation Jansenist and Puritan Spiritualities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eating and Drinking Condemnation Jansenist and Puritan Spiritualities Studies in Spirituality 26, 283-306. doi: 10.2143/SIS.26.0.3180812 © 2016 by Studies in Spirituality. All rights reserved. ELISSA CUTTeR EaTiNG aND DRiNKiNG CONDeMNaTiON Jansenist and Puritan Spiritualities of Communion SUMMARY – Following René Taveneaux and Robin Briggs, scholars have made general comparisons between Jansenism and Puritanism – such as their Augustinian theology and spirituality of strict morality – but few have investigated specific similarities between the two move- ments. This article aims to fill this lacuna by examining parallels between the sacramental theology of the two movements, using the writings of Jonathan Edwards (1703-1758) and Antoine Arnauld (1616-1694). Through a close analysis of these writings, this article argues for a funda- mental similarity between the theologies of these two figures, in spite of the denominational differences separating their understandings of the sacraments. In particular, this article explores the similar emphases that both Edwards and Arnauld put on using the model of the early church as normative for communion practices and on having an appropriate interior disposition before receiving communion. Comparisons between Jansenism and Puritanism appear repeatedly in modern scholarship, especially in general overviews of the history of Christianity.1 These two movements lend themselves to such comparison due to their theological commonalities, like an emphasis on Augustinian theology, and spiritualities underlined by a strict morality. Additionally, historians of religion and theology have found a point of comparison in the polemical nature of the names of each of the movements, making it difficult to fully define either Jansenism or 1 For general overviews of Jansenism and Puritanism in English, see Alexander Sedgwick, Jansenism in seventeenth-century France: Voices from the wilderness, Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia, 1977; Leszek Kolakowski, God owes us nothing: A brief remark on Pascal’s religion and on the spirit of Jansenism, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1995; William Doyle, Jansenism: Catholic resistance to authority from the Reformation to the French Revolution, New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press, 2000 (Studies in European History); John Coffey & Paul C.H. Lim (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Puritanism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008; Francis J. Bremer, Puritanism: A very short introduction, New York: Oxford University Press, 2009; Idem, First founders: American Puritans and Puri- tanism in an atlantic world, Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire Press, 2012. 99213_SIS_26_12_Cutter.indd 283 7/12/16 15:16 284 eLISSA cUTTeR Puritanism.2 Two scholars in particular, René Taveneaux and Robin Briggs, have made a point of comparing the movements.3 Taveneaux’s Jansénisme et prêt à intérêt focused primarily on Jansenism, examining the movement in relation to the morality of lending money at interest.4 He argued that the differing views on credit between Jansenists and Calvinists derived from their differing views of the relationship of the Christian to the world.5 Briggs’s essay on Jansenism, ‘The Catholic Puritans: Jansenists and Rigorists in France’, framed an account of the Jansenist controversy in France with comparisons to Puritanism.6 In this essay, Briggs argued for a fundamental difference between Jansenism and Puritanism, 2 Kaspar von Greyerz, Religion and culture in Early Modern Europe, 1500-1800 (trans. Thomas Dunlap), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, 88; Robin Briggs, ‘The Catholic Puritans: Jansenists and Rigorists in France’, in: Idem, Communities of belief: Cultural and social tension in Early Modern France, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989, 339-363: 339. The term ‘Jansenist’ was a polemical term, introduced by the Jesuits, to refer to those who defended the (allegedly heretical) theological views of grace that were expressed by Cornelius Jansen (1585-1638) in his Augustinus, which was published after his death in 1640. The movement, however, had clear roots in Counter-Reformation, French, Catholic spirituality and the Jansenists always remained a movement within the Catholic Church. Although scholars have had difficulty coming to a consensus around a specific definition of Jansenism, due especially to the histo- riographical difficulties that attend to any definition of a movement that was denied by those who were alleged to be part of it, in their attempts at definition there are generally three main components: a strict Augustinian theology of grace, rigorist sacramental practices, and opposi- tion to the Jesuits. A fourth component, the tendency to withdraw from the world and shun worldly honors, derived from the first two. The term ‘Puritan’ similarly began as a polemical term. Unlike the Jansenists, however, some of those referred to as Puritans eventually appro- priated the term for themselves. After the Reformation in England, Puritans were those who wished to purify the Church of England from all remnants of Roman Catholicism. They wanted to transform society by first transforming themselves in conformity with God’s will. On the definition of Jansenism, see Doyle, Jansenism, 1-4; Jacques Plainemaison, ‘Qu’est-ce que le Jansénisme?’, in: Revue Historique 553 (1985), 117-130; Sedgwick, Jansenism in seventeenth-century France, ix-xv, 14, 193-207. On the definition of Puritanism, see Bremer, Puritanism, 2-3; Coffey & Lim, The Cambridge companion to Puritanism, 1-7; Patrick Collinson, ‘A comment: Concerning the name Puritan’, in: Journal of Ecclesiastical History 31 (1980) no.4, 483-488. As Elfrieda Dubois has noted, the terms janséniste and puritanical have become virtually equivalent in modern usage. See: Elfrieda Dubois, ‘Jansenism’, in: Cheslyn Jones, Geoffrey Wainwright & Edward Yarnold (Eds.),The study of spirituality, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986, 396-408: 405. 3 See Marie-José Michel, ‘Jansénisme et puritanisme: Une approche historiographique’, in: Bernard Cottret, Monique Cottret & Marie-José Michel Eds.), Jansénisme et puritanisme, Paris: Nolin, 2002 (Univers Port-Royal), 13-16, for the history of the comparison between Jansenism and Puritanism from the perspective of a scholar of Jansenism. 4 René Taveneaux, Jansénisme et prêt à intérêt: Introduction, choix de textes et commentaires, Paris: Vrin, 1977. 5 Ibid., 89-90. 6 Briggs, ‘The Catholic Puritans’, 339-363. 99213_SIS_26_12_Cutter.indd 284 7/12/16 15:16 eating and drinking condemnation 285 due to differing contexts, in spite of any apparent similarities. Like Taveneaux, he concluded that especially the Jansenist tendency to withdraw from the world and the Puritan tendency to engage with it set them apart.7 Subsequent scholar- ship on Jansenism and Puritanism identifies Briggs’s essay as the first truly com- parative work on the two movements, but Briggs used the similarities between Jansenism and Puritanism not as a comparative study in and of itself, but as a lens through which to study French Jansenism.8 Subsequent scholarship comparing Jansenism and Puritanism has built on Briggs’s essay, either agreeing or disagreeing with his conclusion.9 Ultimately, what all these comparisons have in common is that they remain general, point- ing out some theological or spiritual similarities, like an emphasis on predestina- tion or moral rigorism, without examining either movement in detail. However, recent formulations of comparative theological methodology stress the impor- tance of making particular, not general, comparisons.10 This study aims to fill this lacuna, by examining more closely the sacramental understanding of com- munion in the thought of two figures, the Puritan Jonathan Edwards (1703-1758) and the Jansenist Antoine Arnauld (1616-1694).11 I argue that, in 7 Ibid., 362. 8 See Michel, ‘Jansénisme et puritanisme’, 13. 9 Some scholars, like Kaspar von Greyerz, agree with Briggs, emphasizing the differences between Jansenism and Puritanism. Von Greyerz notes that although there are similarities between Jansenism and Protestantism in general, for example in terms of justification and the use of the Bible, ‘on the whole there is no doubt that the elements separating them predomi- nated’ (von Greyerz, Religion and culture in Early Modern Europe, 104). Guy Bedouelle, how- ever, notes the similarities, remarking in his History of the Church that Jansenism ‘approached Puritanism and concurred with the latter’s overall vision’ (Guy Bedouelle, The history of the Church, London: Continuum, 2003 [Handbooks of Catholic Theology], 117). French schol- ars have engaged comparisons between Jansenism and Puritanism, expanding on Taveneaux’s work. See, for example, Cottret, Cottret & Michel, Jansénisme et puritanisme. This collection of essays came out of a colloquium on comparisons between Jansenism and Puritanism that occurred at the Musée national des Granges de Port-Royal des Champs in 2001. However, none of the authors included has published in both areas; they are all specialists of either Jansenism or Puritanism. The articles included reflect this and are ultimately more about one or the other than an effective comparison between the two. 10 James L. Fredericks, ‘Introduction’, in: Francis X. Clooney (Ed.), The new comparative theology: Interreligious insights from the next generation, New York, NY: T & T Clark, 2010, ix-xix: xii. 11 Antoine Arnauld was one of the leading theologians of the Jansenists in seventeenth-century France, though he never would have claimed such a title for himself. He was a prolific author, defending
Recommended publications
  • This Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation Has Been Downloaded from Explore Bristol Research
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Jenkins, Clare Helen Elizabeth Title: Jansenism as literature : a study into the influence of Augustinian theology on seventeenth-century French literature General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact [email protected] and include the following information in your message: •Your contact details •Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. Jansenism as Literature: A Study into the Influence of Augustinian Theology on Seventeenth-Century French Literature Clare Helen Elizabeth Jenkins A Dissertation submitted to the University of Bristol in accordance with the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Arts.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORICAL ANTECEDENTS of ST. PIUS X's DECREE on FREQUENT COMMUNION JOHN A
    HISTORICAL ANTECEDENTS OF ST. PIUS X's DECREE ON FREQUENT COMMUNION JOHN A. HARDON, SJ. West Baden College HPHE highest tribute to the apostolic genius of St. Pius X was paid by * his successor on the day he raised him to the honors of the altar: "in the profound vision which he had of the Church as a society, Pius X recognized that it was the Blessed Sacrament which had the power to nourish its intimate life substantially, and to elevate it high above all other human societies." To this end "he overcame the prejudices springing from an erroneous practice and resolutely promoted frequent, even daily, Communion among the faithful," thereby leading "the spouse of Christ into a new era of Euchari^tic life."1 In order to appreciate the benefits which Pius X conferred on the Church by his decree on frequent Communion, we might profitably examine the past half-century to see how the practice which he advo­ cated has revitalized the spiritual life of millions of the faithful. Another way is to go back in history over the centuries preceding St. Pius and show that the discipline which he promulgated in 1905 is at once a vindication of the Church's fidelity to her ancient traditions and a proof of her vitality to be rid of whatever threatens to destroy her divine mission as the sanctifier of souls. The present study will follow the latter method, with an effort to cover all the principal factors in this Eucharistic development which had its roots in the apostolic age but was not destined to bear full fruit until the present time.
    [Show full text]
  • By Alan D. Strange
    MJT 14 (2003) 57-97 JONATHAN EDWARDS AND THE COMMUNION CONTROVERSY IN NORTHAMPTON by Alan D. Strange JONATHAN EDWARDS CAME to Northampton, Massachusetts in 1727 to serve as assistant pastor to his renowned maternal grandfather, Solomon Stoddard. He and his grandfather agreed on most things, including what it meant to be a true Christian. Stoddard taught that a saving work of the Holy Spirit was necessary for one to be a true Christian and to be admitted to heaven.1 Edwards agreed with this and taught the same throughout his life.2 Stoddard also taught that whether or not someone had experienced such a saving work of the Holy Spirit was not necessarily discernable by others. Because the saving work of the Holy Spirit remained ultimately undetectable, Stoddard taught that anyone who agreed with the doctrines of Christianity and was moral in life could partake of Holy Communion, whether they professed such a saving work or not.3 Edwards came to disagree with this and argued that 1Many examples of this from Stoddard’s preaching and writing might be adduced. See his Safety of Appearing in the Righteousness of Christ (Northampton: S. & E. Butler, 1804; rpt., Morgan, PA: Soli Deo Gloria, 1995), 161-261, and The Tryal of Assurance (a lecture-day sermon preached by Stoddard in Boston on July 7, 1698, published there by B. Green and J. Allen), 6-7. 2Edwards’s emphasis on the necessity of a saving work of the Holy Spirit is such a pervasive theme that the entirety of his corpus demonstrates his unshakeable conviction of the necessity of “A Divine and Supernatural Light Immediately Imparted to the Soul by the Spirit of God …” as seen in Wilson M.
    [Show full text]
  • Jonathan Edwards' Life: More Than a Sermon
    Jonathan Edwards 1 Running Head: JONATHAN EDWARDS Jonathan Edwards' Life: More Than a Sermon Matthew Ryan Martin A Senior Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation in the Honors Program Liberty University Spring 2003 Jonathan Edwards 2 Acceptance of Senior Honors Thesis This Senior Honors Thesis is accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation from the Honors Program of Liberty University. Chairman of Thesis ~~Ha.rVeY man, Th.D. .. Committee Member Branson Woodard Jr., D.A. Committee Member JrJdy,/, ,.IS ndlin, Ph.D. ASSIstant Honors Program Director Jonathan Edwards 3 Abstract Jonathan Edwards, born, (1703-1758), was a great man. He is often known only for a sermon, "Sinners in the Aands of an Angry God." This is unfortunate because followers of Christ should know this man's life. This paper focuses on Jonathan Edwards as a godly family man and on his missiological work. An emphasis is not carefully analyzed by many. The research for this essay originated from the author's desire to know more about Mr. Edwards. The texts studied are The works ofJonathan Edwards, along with many scholarly books and essays. The main modern books used are from Perry Miller and Elizabeth Dodds. All in all, the following research adds clarity and context to Edwards' legacy and to its enduring value to Christians. Jonathan Edwards 4 Jonathan Edwards' Life: More Than a Sermon Introduction Even after growing up in the church as a child, the writer did not discover the name of Jonathan Edwards until the beginning of his high school freshman year.
    [Show full text]
  • Malebranche's Augustinianism and the Mind's Perfection
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations Spring 2010 Malebranche's Augustinianism and the Mind's Perfection Jason Skirry University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the History of Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Skirry, Jason, "Malebranche's Augustinianism and the Mind's Perfection" (2010). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 179. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/179 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/179 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Malebranche's Augustinianism and the Mind's Perfection Abstract This dissertation presents a unified interpretation of Malebranche’s philosophical system that is based on his Augustinian theory of the mind’s perfection, which consists in maximizing the mind’s ability to successfully access, comprehend, and follow God’s Order through practices that purify and cognitively enhance the mind’s attention. I argue that the mind’s perfection figures centrally in Malebranche’s philosophy and is the main hub that connects and reconciles the three fundamental principles of his system, namely, his occasionalism, divine illumination, and freedom. To demonstrate this, I first present, in chapter one, Malebranche’s philosophy within the historical and intellectual context of his membership in the French Oratory, arguing that the Oratory’s particular brand of Augustinianism, initiated by Cardinal Bérulle and propagated by Oratorians such as Andre Martin, is at the core of his philosophy and informs his theory of perfection. Next, in chapter two, I explicate Augustine’s own theory of perfection in order to provide an outline, and a basis of comparison, for Malebranche’s own theory of perfection.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Épreuves De L'incertain 30 Et 31 Mai 2017
    Danna Kostroun, histoire, Indiana University, Purdue University-Indianapolis, Etats- Unis et résidente 2016-2017 à l’IEA de Nantes Action against Uncertainty : The Case of Port-Royal This paper examines the relationship between action and uncertainty at Port Royal. The Cistercian convent of Port-Royal-des-Champs became famous in the 17th century as the center of a Catholic reform movement known as Jansenism. The community at Port-Royal was made up of the nuns who lived in the convent and a group of lay men and women who lived on the convent farm in pious retreat. The community is famous not only for its role in religious reform, but for the intellectual work of its members, who published philosophical and polemical treatises on a number of subjects. Port-Royal was an institution designed to confront uncertainty. Its members recognized many forms of uncertainty and developed different responses to them. The first form of uncertainty dealt with the relationship between humans and God. To confront this uncertainty, Port-Royal adhered to tradition (St. Augustine’s writings on grace) and performed acts of routine, ritual, and repetition (i.e. Blaise Pascal’s human “machine” behavior). The next source of uncertainty dealt with the natural universe and human institutions. To confront this uncertainty, they produced treatises on logic, education, grammar, medicine, and other fields, through which they sought to establish a normative order through reason. A third source of uncertainty was that created by human passions. Humans generated uncertainty when they allowed passions (such as a desire for wealth, domination, or power) to obscure, blind, or otherwise obstruct reason.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of Old Catholicism
    The Origins of Old Catholicism By Jarek Kubacki and Łukasz Liniewicz On September 24th 1889, the Old Catholic bishops of the Netherlands, Switzerland and Germany signed a common declaration. This event is considered to be the beginning of the Union of Utrecht of the Old Catholic Churches, federation of several independent national Churches united on the basis of the faith of the undivided Church of the first ten centuries. They are Catholic in faith, order and worship but reject the Papal claims of infallibility and supremacy. The Archbishop of Utrecht a holds primacy of honor among the Old Catholic Churches not dissimilar to that accorded in the Anglican Communion to the Archbishop of Canterbury. Since the year 2000 this ministry belongs to Archbishop JorisVercammen. The following churches are members of the Union of Utrecht: the Old Catholic Church of the Netherlands, the Catholic Diocese of the Old Catholics in Germany, Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, the Old Catholic Church of Austria, the Old Catholic Church of the Czech Republic, the Polish-Catholic Church and apart from them there are also not independent communities in Croatia, France, Sweden, Denmark and Italy. Besides the Anglican churches, also the Philippine Independent Church is in full communion with the Old Catholics. The establishment of the Old Catholic churches is usually being related to the aftermath of the First Vatican Council. The Old Catholic were those Catholics that refused to accept the doctrine of Papal Infallibility and the Universal Jurisdiction. One has to remember, however, that the origins of Old Catholicism lay much earlier. We shouldn’t forget, above all, that every church which really deserves to be called by that name has its roots in the church of the first centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Antoine Arnauld | Encyclopedia.Com
    encyclopedia.com Antoine Arnauld | Encyclopedia.com Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography COPYRIGHT 2008 Charles Scribner's Sons 4-5 minutes (b. Paris, France, 1612; d. Brussels, Belgium, 6 August 1694) mathematics, linguistics. Arnauld was the youngest of the twenty children of Antoine Arnauld, a lawyer who defended the University of Paris against the Jesuits in 1594. He was ordained a priest and received the doctorate in theology in 1641, and entered the Sorbonne in 1643, after the death of Richelieu. In 1656 he was expelled from the Sorbonne for his Jansenist views, and spent a good part of the rest of his life in more or less violent theological dispute. He died in self-imposed exile. Although in many of his nontheological writings Arnauld is identified with the Port-Royal school, his voluminous correspondence—with Descartes and Leibniz, among others—bears witness to his own influence and acumen. His philosophical contributions are to be found in his objections to Descartes’s Méditations, in his dispute with Malebranche, and in the Port-Royal Logic, which he wrote with Pierre Nicole. The latter, a text developed from Descartes’s Regulae, elaborates the theory of “clear and distinct” ideas and gives the first account of Pascal’s Méthode. It had an enormous influence as a textbook until comparatively recent times. The profound influence of the Regulae is shown in both the Logic and the Port-Royal Grammar, where it is assumed that linguistic and mental processes are virtually identical, that language is thus to be studied in its “inner” and “outer” aspects. This point of view underlies the project for a universal grammar and the notion of the “transparency” of language: mental processes are common to all human beings, although there are many languages.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Francis of Assisi Parish ! ! !! ! the Catholic Community in Weston ! Sunday, Aug
    35 NǐǓLJNJdžǍDž RǐǂDž ! WdžǔǕǐǏ, CǐǏǏdžDŽǕNJDŽǖǕ 06883 ! ST. FRANCIS! We extend a warm welcome to all who ! worship at our church! We hope that you ! will find our parish community to be a place ! where your faith is nourished. ! OF ASSISI ! ! Rectory: 203 !227 !1341 FAX: 203 !226 !1154 Website: www.stfrancisweston.org Facebook: Saint Francis of Assisi ! The PARISH! Catholic Community in Weston Religious Education/Youth Ministry: ! ! 203 !227 !8353 THE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY IN WESTON Preschool: 203 !454 !8646 ! ! RdžDŽǕǐǓǚ OLJLJNJDŽdž HǐǖǓǔ ! August 4, 2019 Monday Through Friday 9:00 a.m. ! 4:00 p.m. ! SǖǏDžǂǚ Mǂǔǔdžǔ ! Saturday Vigil ! 5:00 P.M. Sundays 8:00, 9:30 ! Family Mass, 11:00 A.M. 5:00 p.m. Scheduled Weekly ! Except for Christmas & Easter. ! WdždžnjDžǂǚ Mǂǔǔdžǔ ! Monday ! Friday ! 7:30 A.M. Saturday & Holidays ! 9:00 A.M. ! HǐǍǚ Dǂǚ Mǂǔǔdžǔ ! 7:30 A.M. , Noon , 7:00 P.M. ! NǐǗdžǏǂ ! Novena prayers in honor of Our Lady of the Miraculous Medal every Saturday following the 9:00 A.M. Mass. ! SǂDŽǓǂǎdžǏǕ OLJ RdžDŽǐǏDŽNJǍNJǂǕNJǐǏ ! Saturdays, 4:00 !4:45 P.M.; Sundays 4:00 P.M. ! SǂDŽǓǂǎdžǏǕ OLJ BǂǑǕNJǔǎ ! The Sacrament of Baptism is offered every Sunday at 12:00 noon. Please make arrangements for the Pre !Baptismal instructions after the birth of the child in person at the rectory. Pre !instruction for both parents is required. ! SǂDŽǓǂǎdžǏǕ OLJ MǂǕǓNJǎǐǏǚ ! Arrangements must be made at the rectory in person by the couple. Where possible, arrangements should be made one year in advance and no later than six months. ! SǂDŽǓǂǎdžǏǕ OLJ AǏǐNJǏǕNJǏLj ! Communal anointings of the sick are celebrated.
    [Show full text]
  • Irenaeus Shed Considerable Light on the Place of Pentecostal Thought for Histories That Seek to Be International and Ecumenical
    Orphans or Widows? Seeing Through A Glass Darkly By Dr. Harold D. Hunter Abstract Scholars seeking to map the antecedents of Pentecostal distinctives in early Christendom turn to standard reference works expecting to find objective summaries of the writings of Church Fathers and Mothers. Apparently dismissing the diversity of the biblical canon itself, the writers of these reference works can be found manipulating patristic texts in ways which reinforce the notion that the Classical Pentecostal Movement is a historical aberration. This prejudice is evident in the selection of texts and how they are translated and indexed as well as the surgical removal of pertinent sections of the original texts. This problem can be set right only by extensive reading of the original sources in the original languages. The writings of Irenaeus shed considerable light on the place of Pentecostal thought for histories that seek to be international and ecumenical. Introduction I began advanced study of classical Pentecostal distinctives at Fuller Theological Seminary in the early 1970s. Among those offering good advice was the then academic dean of Vanguard University in nearby Costa Mesa, California, Russell P. Spittler. While working on a patristic project, Spittler emphasized the need for me to engage J. Quasten and like scholars. More recently I utilized Quasten et al in dialogue with William Henn in a paper presented to the International Roman Catholic - Pentecostal Dialogue which convened July 23-29, 1999 in Venice, Italy. What follows is the substance of the paper delivered at that meeting.i The most influential editions of Church Fathers and Mothers available in the 20th Century suffered from inadequate translation of key passages.
    [Show full text]
  • A “Calvinist” Theory of Matter? Burgersdijk and Descartes on Res Extensa
    Title Page A “Calvinist” Theory of Matter? Burgersdijk and Descartes on res extensa Giovanni Gellera ORCID IDENTIFIER 0000-0002-8403-3170 Section de philosophie, Université de Lausanne [email protected] The Version of Record of this manuscript has been published and is available in Intellectual History Review volume 28 (2018), issue 2. Published online 24 Novembre 2017. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17496977.2017.1374058 Abstract In the Dutch debates on Cartesianism of the 1640s, a minority believed that some Cartesian views were in fact Calvinist ones. The paper argues that, among others, a likely precursor of this position is the Aristotelian Franco Burgersdijk (1590-1635), who held a reductionist view of accidents and of the essential extension of matter on Calvinist grounds. It seems unlikely that Descartes was unaware of these views. The claim is that Descartes had two aims in his Replies to Arnauld: to show the compatibility of res extensa and the Catholic transubstantiation but also to differentiate the res extensa from some views of matter explicitly defended by some Calvinists. The association with Calvinism will be eventually used polemically against Cartesianism, for example in France. The paper finally suggests that, notwithstanding the points of conflict, the affinities between the theologically relevant theories of accidents, matter and extension ultimately facilitated the dissemination of Cartesianism among the Calvinists. Keywords: Descartes, Burgersdijk, res extensa, accident, Calvinist scholasticism, eucharist 2 G. GELLERA A “Calvinist” Theory of Matter? Burgersdijk and Descartes on res extensa Giovanni Gellera University of Lausanne, Switzerland In 1651 Count Louis Henry of Nassau demanded that the Dutch universities issue public statements on Cartesian philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Blaise Pascal: from Birth to Rebirth to Apologist
    Blaise Pascal: From Birth to Rebirth to Apologist A Thesis Presented To Dr. Stephen Strehle Liberty University Graduate School In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Course THEO 690 Thesis by Lew A. Weider May 9, 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 Chapter I. JANSENISM AND ITS INFLUENCE ON BLAISE PASCAL 12 The Origin of Jansenism . 12 Jansenism and Its Influence on the Pascals . 14 Blaise Pascal and his Experiments with Science and Technology . 16 The Pascal's Move Back to Paris . 19 The Pain of Loneliness for Blaise Pascal . 21 The Worldly Period . 23 Blaise Pascal's Second Conversion 26 Pascal and the Provincial Lettres . 28 The Origin of the Pensees . 32 II. PASCAL AND HIS MEANS OF BELIEF 35 The Influence on Pascal's Means of Belief 36 Pascal and His View of Reason . 42 Pascal and His View of Faith . 45 III. THE PENSEES: PASCAL'S APOLOGETIC FOR THE CHRISTIAN FAITH 50 The Wager Argument . 51 The Miracles of Holy Scripture 56 The Prophecies . 60 CONCLUSION . 63 BIBLIOGRAPHY . 65 INTRODUCTION Blaise Pascal was a genius. He was revered as a great mathematician and physicist, an inventor, and the greatest prose stylist in the French language. He was a defender of religious freedom and an apologist of the Christian faith. He was born June 19, 1623, at Clermont, the capital of Auvergne, which was a small town of about nine thousand inhabitants. He was born to Etienne and Antoinette Pascal. Blaise had two sisters, Gilberte, born in 1620, and Jacqueline, born in 1625. Blaise was born into a very influential family.
    [Show full text]