William Bladen of Annapolis, 1673?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

William Bladen of Annapolis, 1673? William Bladen of Annapolis, 1673?-1718: “the most capable in all Respects” o r “Blockhead Booby”? b y C. Ashley Ellefson Copyright © 2007 b y C. Ashley Ellefson All rights reserved Not to be reproduced, in whole or in part, manually, mechani- cally, electronically, or by any other method that might be invented, without the permission of the author or his proxy. For Phebe Jacobsen 24 March 1922 - 19 April 2000 “No man can judge what is good evidence on any particular subject, unless he knows that subject well.” George Eliot Middlemarch “Brack: But it has been very much praised, I hear. “Lövborg: That was what I wanted; so I put nothing into the book but what every one would agree with. “Brack: Very wise of you.” Henrik Ibsen, Hedda Gabler Tomb & Inscription of William Bladen St. Anne’s Church, Annapolis MD Courtesy of Historic Annapolis Foundation Contents Title Page i Copyright Page ii Dedication iii Quotes iv Bladen’s Tomb v Table of Contents vi Acknowledgments vii A Note on Use of Dates xi Foreword xii Notes: Forward xiv Chapter 1. Introduction: The Turbulent Seventeenth Century 1 Notes: Introduction 21 2. Jump-Start to Fortune 42 Notes: Jump-Start 45 3. Placeman 49 Notes: Placeman 74 4. Publisher 103 Notes: Publisher 107 5. Contractor 112 Notes: Contractor 134 6. Attorney General 152 Notes: Attorney General 184 Appendix to Chapter 6: William Bladen as Defense Attorney 219 Notes: Bladen as Defense Attorney 231 7. Bladen the Man 240 Notes: Bladen the Man 255 Appendix A: William Bladen’s Birth and His Arrival in Maryland 265 Notes: Bladen’s Birth and Arrival in Maryland 267 Appendix B: William Bladen and Letitia Loftus: A Voyage in Search of a Wife and an Exercise in Genealogy 269 Notes: William Bladen and Letitia Loftus 274 Tables: William Bladen’s Offices 72 William Bladen’s Prosecutions of Thomas Macnemara 182 Index on William Bladen and Thomas Macnemara 279 Index on Selected Items 283 Acknowledgments I owe thanks to a number of people for their help during the many years I have been doing research for this essay. Dr. Edward C. Papenfuse, State Archivist and Commissioner of Land Patents, and his staff at the Maryland State Archives in Annapolis are following the outstand- ing precedent that Dr. Morris L. Radoff and Gust Skordas established during their many years at the Hall of Records. Unless otherwise noted, all of the records I have used are at the State Archives. Also at the State Archives, Patricia V. Melville, former Director of Appraisal and Description, was always patient in answering my questions about the records. Dr. R. J. Rockefeller, former Director of Reference Services, helped me by checking the wording of three entries in the published Archives of Maryland against the wording in the original records. I appreciate also the help of the other archivists in the Search Room over the years. Special thanks must go also to the hard-working and often unappreciated people in the Search Room at the State Archives who invariably have been untiring and courteous in lugging the often heavy records from the stacks to the desks and back to the stacks again. Outside the Search Room, Dr. Papenfuse has always responded promptly to my enquiries and requests. Lynne MacAdam, former Webmaster and Director of Electronic Publications, went out of her way for me to get information I needed before I could order some records and to check the files on William Bladen and Thomas Bladen in the Legislative History Project for citations on William Bladen’s death. Emily Oland Squires, Director of Biographical Research, provided me with information on the price of land in eighteenth-century Maryland and sent me the files Acknowledgments viii from the Legislative History Project on William Bladen and Philip Lynes. Dr. Papenfuse, Emily Squires, Richard Richardson, Personnel Officer and Deputy Commissioner, and Michael McCormick, Director of Reference Services, were instrumental in providing me with information from the land records on some of Bladen’s purchases of land. I also thank Joshua Mason, formerly of Reference Services, for actually pulling this information from the records. Dr. Papenfuse, Dr. Jean Russo, Research Archivist and Associate General Editor of the Archives of Maryland Online, and Lynne MacAdam have given me encouragement when I needed it most, and I thank Dr. Papenfuse and Dr. Russo for providing me the opportunity to include this manuscript on the Archives of Maryland Online. Diane Evartt, Director and Editor of the Maryland Manual, has been a good friend to both my bride Beverly Ann and me and, in the tradition of the late Phebe and Bryce Jacobsen, is one of the very good people in the world. At the Historic Annapolis Foundation, Dr. Gregory A. Stiverson, former President, and Patricia Blick, Vice-President for Preservation and Education, pro- vided me with the photographs of Bladen’s tomb, and Alecia Parker, former Research and Interpretation Coordinator, speedily responded to my inquiry about Bladen. The photos of William Bladen’s tomb are reprinted courtesy of the Historic Annapolis Foundation. An exchange of e-mails on Oliver Cromwell with Jane McWilliams, of Annapolis, helped me to clarify some of the wording in my chapter on the seven- teenth century. At the Maryland Historical Society, Jennifer A. Bryan, former Curator of Manuscripts and Archives, took time to answer my questions, and Francis O’Neill, Reference Librarian, checked the “Supplement to His Lordship’s Patronage” for the source of Donnell M. Owings’ use of 7 August 1718 for the date of Bladen’s death. I also thank Dr. Robert I. Cottom, Editor of the Maryland Historical Magazine, for his permission to quote from that journal and from the published Archives of Mary- land. Getting acquainted with Beth Alvarez, Curator of Literary Manuscripts at the Hornbake Library at the University of Maryland in College Park, has been a pleasure, and she also put me in touch with Douglas P. McElrath, Curator of Marylandia, Rare Books, and the Collection of the National Trust for Historic Preservation there, who Acknowledgments ix in turn alerted me to the work of Calhoun Winton. At the Library of Congress, Michael J. Klein, former Manuscript Reference Librarian, and Jeffrey M. Flannery, Acting Assistant Chief of the Manuscript Divi- sion, provided me with information from the photocopies of the Colonial Office Papers to fill in some voids in the information I got when I went through the appro- priate photocopies many years ago. The original Colonial Office Papers are of course in The National Archives in London. In England Pam Flynn, Copyright Administrator in Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, Norwich, England, provided me with information on copyright; John Brook- er, Special Collections Assistant, J. B. Priestley Library, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, informed me of the distance between Steeton and Wad- worth; and Susan Caton, Customer Support Assistant in the Department of Arts, Heritage & Leisure: Libraries, Archives & Information Service, Bradford, West Yorkshire, sent me a very helpful map of that area. At the Binghamton University Libraries, Binghamton, New York, Colleen Hailey, Business and Cinema Librarian, and Ronnie Goldberg, Assistant Director for Access Services, checked on some items for me. I also thank Professor John J. McCusker, Ewing Halsell Distinguished Profes- sor of American History and Professor of Economics at Trinity University, San Antonio, Texas, for his information and advice on current money of Maryland in the eighteenth century, and Professor Marc Harris of Pennsylvania State University, Professor Russell Stoermer of George Washington University, Professor L. H. Roper of the State University of New York at New Paltz, and Professor Michael Bellesiles for their responses to my query about the competence of English officials in colonial America. At Cortland, Eileen Williams, Gretchen Gogan, Laurie Pepper, and Beverly Ann have gone beyond anything that could be expected of them to get me the sources I have needed on interlibrary loan. Also in the library, Dr. Mary Bielby, Thomas Bonn, David Kreh, and especially Margaret Anderson have been helpful. Our friend and former colleague Frank Ray read an early copy of the manuscript, and another friend and former colleague, Dr. Harry Dahlheimer, gave me some good advice on revision. A conversation with my neighbor and friend Ron Sickmon about architectural Acknowledgments x terms relating to the chapter on William Bladen as a contractor has made me feel more secure about the obscure. Beverly Ann has spent many a stressful hour helping me to cope with comput- ers. She also spent dozens of hours tracing the genealogy of Letitia Loftus, whom many historians identify, we believe mistakenly, as William Bladen’s first wife, and she has spent many hours in searching other things as well. She is also my most important advisor. Finally, we have to say something about Phebe Jacobsen, to whom this manu- script is dedicated. Phebe was a good friend from the time I started doing research at the old Hall of Records in Annapolis in the fall of 1961 or the spring of 1962, and she quickly became a good friend of Beverly Ann when she started working at the Hall of Records in 1966. She had a sensitivity, a compassion, and a decency that one seldom finds in people. Always courteous and helpful, as an archivist she had a broad knowledge for which not every researcher gave her proper credit. She accepted the condescension with patience and humor and went on with her job. C. Ashley Ellefson Cortland, New York May 2007 A Note on Use of Dates Until 1752 England continued to use the Julian Calendar, which was introduced by Julius Caesar in 46 B. C.
Recommended publications
  • Nanjemoy and Mattawoman Creek Watersheds
    Defining the Indigenous Cultural Landscape for The Nanjemoy and Mattawoman Creek Watersheds Prepared By: Scott M. Strickland Virginia R. Busby Julia A. King With Contributions From: Francis Gray • Diana Harley • Mervin Savoy • Piscataway Conoy Tribe of Maryland Mark Tayac • Piscataway Indian Nation Joan Watson • Piscataway Conoy Confederacy and Subtribes Rico Newman • Barry Wilson • Choptico Band of Piscataway Indians Hope Butler • Cedarville Band of Piscataway Indians Prepared For: The National Park Service Chesapeake Bay Annapolis, Maryland St. Mary’s College of Maryland St. Mary’s City, Maryland November 2015 ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this project was to identify and represent the Indigenous Cultural Landscape for the Nanjemoy and Mattawoman creek watersheds on the north shore of the Potomac River in Charles and Prince George’s counties, Maryland. The project was undertaken as an initiative of the National Park Service Chesapeake Bay office, which supports and manages the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail. One of the goals of the Captain John Smith Trail is to interpret Native life in the Middle Atlantic in the early years of colonization by Europeans. The Indigenous Cultural Landscape (ICL) concept, developed as an important tool for identifying Native landscapes, has been incorporated into the Smith Trail’s Comprehensive Management Plan in an effort to identify Native communities along the trail as they existed in the early17th century and as they exist today. Identifying ICLs along the Smith Trail serves land and cultural conservation, education, historic preservation, and economic development goals. Identifying ICLs empowers descendant indigenous communities to participate fully in achieving these goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Women and the Law in Colonial Maryland, 1648-1715 Monica C
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects "Justice Without Partiality": Women and the Law in Colonial Maryland, 1648-1715 Monica C. Witkowski Marquette University Recommended Citation Witkowski, Monica C., ""Justice Without Partiality": Women and the Law in Colonial Maryland, 1648-1715" (2010). Dissertations (2009 -). Paper 27. http://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/27 “JUSTICE WITHOUT PARTIALITY”: WOMEN AND THE LAW IN COLONIAL MARYLAND, 1648-1715 by Monica C. Witkowski A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2010 ABSTRACT “JUSTICE WITHOUT PARTIALITY”: WOMEN AND THE LAW IN COLONIAL MARYLAND, 1648-1715 Monica C. Witkowski Marquette University, 2010 What was the legal status of women in early colonial Maryland? This is the central question answered by this dissertation. Women, as exemplified through a series of case studies, understood the law and interacted with the nascent Maryland legal system. Each of the cases in the following chapters is slightly different. Each case examined in this dissertation illustrates how much independent legal agency women in the colony demonstrated. Throughout the seventeenth century, Maryland women appeared before the colony’s Provincial and county courts as witnesses, plaintiffs, defendants, and attorneys in criminal and civil trials. Women further entered their personal cattle marks, claimed land, and sued other colonists. This study asserts that they improved their social standing through these interactions with the courts. By exerting this much legal knowledge, they created an important place for themselves in Maryland society. Historians have begun to question the interpretation that Southern women were restricted to the home as housewives and mothers.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Fiscal Year 2020
    Maryland State Archives Annual Report Fiscal Year 2020 Annual Report of the State Archivist to the Governor and General Assembly (State Government Article, § 9-1007(d)) Timothy D. Baker State Archivist and Commissioner of Land Patents August 2020 Maryland State Archives 350 Rowe Boulevard · Annapolis, MD 21401 410-260-6400 · http://msa.maryland.gov ​ ​ MSA Annual Report Fiscal Year 2020 This Page Left Blank MSA Annual Report Fiscal Year 2020 This Page Left Blank MSA Annual Report Fiscal Year 2020 Table of Contents Agency Organization & Overview of Activities . 3 Hall of Records Commission Meeting of November 14, 2019 Agenda . 27 Minutes . .47 Chronology of Staff Events. .55 Records Retention Schedules . .65 Disposal Certificate Approvals . .. .70 Records Received . .78 Special Collections Received . 92 Hall of Records Commission Meeting of May 08, 2020 Agenda . .93 Minutes . .115 Chronology of Staff Activities . .121 Records Retention Schedules . .129 Disposal Certificate Approvals . 132 Records Received . 141 Special Collections Received . .. 158 Maryland Commission on Artistic Property Meeting of Agenda . 159 Minutes . 163 MSA Annual Report Fiscal Year 2020 This Page Left Blank 2 MSA Annual Report Fiscal Year 2020 STATE ARCHIVES ANNUAL REPORT FY 2020 OVERVIEW · Hall of Records Commission Agenda, Fall 2019 ​ · Hall of Records Commission Agenda, Spring 2020 ​ · Commission on Artistic Property Agenda, Fall 2019 ​ The State Archives was created in 1935 as the Hall of Records and reorganized under its present name in 1984 (Chapter 286, Acts of 1984). Upon that reorganization the Commission on Artistic Property was made part of the State Archives. As Maryland's historical agency, the State Archives is the central depository for government records of permanent value.
    [Show full text]
  • May 17, 2020 the Honorable Larry Hogan Governor of Maryland 100 State Circle Annapolis, Maryland 21401-1925 Dear Governor
    May 17, 2020 The Honorable Larry Hogan Governor of Maryland 100 State Circle Annapolis, Maryland 21401-1925 Dear Governor Hogan: We write on behalf of the Prince George’s County House and Senate Delegations. While we appreciate the hard work you and your Administration have done thus far, we write with grave concern about the status of coronavirus in Maryland, particularly in Prince George’s County, and your recently announced plans to reopen, which, in our view, are not justified by, data, facts or your own previously-stated metrics and roadmap to recovery. Furthermore, we are alarmed at your Administration’s silence and lack of response to urgent requests from Prince George’s County, the hardest hit jurisdiction in the State—these requests being made earnestly in an effort to protect Prince Georgians and save lives. In an April 30, 2020 letter, Prince George’s County Executive, Angela Alsobrooks, wrote your liaison, Steve Schuh, as follow-up from a discussion about the County’s needs, including increased hospital capacity, expanded testing, improved contact tracing, and increased supplies of personal protective equipment. If we are all “Maryland Strong” then we must be responsive, coordinated, and all must work together. Regarding hospital capacity, we appreciate your decision to re-open parts of Laurel Regional Hospital and providing 135 additional beds, but your Administration has not responded to requests for additional medical tents and critical care staffing needs in portions of the County urgently at need. When the State decided against opening a facility at the Prince George’s Sports and Learning Complex in Landover, the County was promised additional medical tents, however, the state reneged on its promise and the County never received a response.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Historical Magazine, 1997, Volume 92, Issue No. 2
    i f of 5^1- 1-3^-7 Summer 1997 MARYLAND Historical Magazine TU THE MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY Founded 1844 Dennis A. Fiori, Director The Maryland Historical Magazine Robert I. Cottom, Editor Patricia Dockman Anderson, Associate Editor Donna B. Shear, Managing Editor Jeff Goldman, Photographer Angela Anthony, Robin Donaldson Coblentz, Christopher T.George, Jane Gushing Lange, and Robert W. Schoeberlein, Editorial Associates Regional Editors John B. Wiseman, Frostburg State University Jane G. Sween, Montgomery Gounty Historical Society Pegram Johnson III, Accoceek, Maryland Acting as an editorial board, the Publications Committee of the Maryland Historical Society oversees and supports the magazine staff. Members of the committee are: John W. Mitchell, Upper Marlboro; Trustee/Ghair Jean H. Baker, Goucher Gollege James H. Bready, Baltimore Sun Robert J. Brugger, The Johns Hopkins University Press Lois Green Garr, St. Mary's Gity Gommission Toby L. Ditz, The Johns Hopkins University Dennis A. Fiori, Maryland Historical Society, ex-officio David G. Fogle, University of Maryland Jack G. Goellner, Baltimore Averil Kadis, Enoch Pratt Free Library Roland G. McGonnell, Morgan State University Norvell E. Miller III, Baltimore Richard Striner, Washington Gollege John G. Van Osdell, Towson State University Alan R. Walden, WBAL, Baltimore Brian Weese, Bibelot, Inc., Pikesville Members Emeritus John Higham, The Johns Hopkins University Samuel Hopkins, Baltimore Gharles McG. Mathias, Ghevy Ghase The views and conclusions expressed in this magazine are those of the authors. The editors are responsible for the decision to make them public. ISSN 0025-4258 © 1997 by the Maryland Historical Society. Published as a benefit of membership in the Maryland Historical Society in March, June, September, and December.
    [Show full text]
  • AP22 1990.Pdf (16.52Mb)
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATION OF STATE CIRCLE, ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND by Esther Doyle Read Contributions by Jean Russo George Logan Brett Burk Mark P. Leone, PhD Barbara J. Little, PhD Principal Investigators 30 June 1990 Report prepared for the City of Annapolis by "Archaeology in Annapolis" A cooperative project between The Historic Annapolis Foundation and The University of Maryland, College Park ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for the State Circle Archaeological Project was provided by the City of Annapolis. The State of Maryland provided the City with the bulk of funding for the undergrounding of the utilities and also provided the bulk of the funds for the archaeological component of the project. All of the State funds were administered through the State's Department of General Services. The funds allotted to the City were administered by the City's Department of Public Works. The City of Annapolis, Department of Public Works administered the funds for the archaeological project. Historic Annapolis Foundation administered the funds for the archaeological project under an agreement with the city's Department of Public Works. The University of Maryland, College Park, through its Department of Anthropology, provided all the labor and supervision for the archaeological project. The Maryland Historical Trust, a division of the State's Department of Housing and Community Development facilitated the agreements between the State, the City, and Historic Annapolis k oundation. Numerous individuals contributed to the success of this project. I would like to thank Govenor William Donald Schaffer for his support of the archaeological work done on State Circle. Earl Seboda, Director of the State Department of General Services and Jerry Walls, Chief of the Department of General Services Police, as well as their staffs, were always supportive throughout the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Xerox University Microfilms 900 North Zwb Road Ann Aibor, Michigan 40106 76 - 18,001
    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produoad from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological meant to photograph and reproduce this document have bean used, the quality it heavily dependant upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing paga(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. Whan an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause e blurted image. You will find a good Image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. Whan a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand comer of e large Sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with e small overlap. I f necessary, sectioning is continued again - beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could bo made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • WI-578 Governor E. E. Jackson House, the Oaks,Site
    WI-578 Governor E. E. Jackson House, The Oaks,site Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse- chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on-site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the “vertical files” at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 08-29-2003 WI-578 1883-84, 1905 The Oaks Salisbury (Site) Private The last decades of the nineteenth century were particularly prosperous ones for the citizens of Salisbury, who had built up over the course of twenty years the largest commercial, industrial, and trading center on the peninsula south of Wilmington, Delaware. The most ambitious domestic construction project during the early 1880s was the design and assemblage of the sprawling Shingle-style mansion for Elihu Emory Jackson and Nellie Rider Jackson on a large parcel of land bordering North Division and West Isabella streets.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the College of William and Mary from Its Foundation, 1693
    1693 - 1870 m 1m mmtm m m m&NBm iKMi Sam On,•'.;:'.. m '' IIP -.•. m : . UBS . mm W3m BBSshsR iillltwlll ass I HHH1 m '. • ml §88 BmHRSSranH M£$ Sara ,mm. mam %£kff EARL GREGG SWEM LIBRARY THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY IN VIRGINIA Presented By Dorothy Dickinson PIPPEN'S a BOOI^ a g OllD STORE, 5j S) 60S N. Eutaw St. a. BALT WORE. BOOES EOUOE' j ESCHANQED. 31 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from LYRASIS Members and Sloan Foundation http://www.archive.org/details/historyofcollege1870coll 0\JI.LCkj£ THE HISTORY College of William and Mary From its Foundation, 1693, to 1870. BALTIMOKE: Printed by John Murphy & Co. Publishers, Booksellers, Printers and Stationers, 182 Baltimore Street. 1870. Oath of Visitor, I. A. B., do golemnly promise and swear, that I will truly and faith- fully execute the duties of my office, as a vistor of William and Mary College, according to the best of my skill and judgment, without favour, affection or partiality. So help me God. Oath of President or Professor. I, do swear, that I will well and truly execute the duties of my office of according to the best of my ability. So help me God. THE CHARTER OF THE College of William and Mary, In Virginia. WILLIAM AND MARY, by the grace of God, of England, Scot- land, France and Ireland, King and Queen, defenders of the faith, &c. To all to whom these our present letters shall come, greeting. Forasmuch as our well-beloved and faithful subjects, constituting the General Assembly of our Colony of Virginia, have had it in their minds, and have proposed
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Historical Magazine, 1995, Volume 90, Issue No. 4
    I-1-Si Winter 1995 MARYLAND 2 -aa> 3 Q. Historical Magazine THE MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY Founded 1844 Dennis A. Fiori, Director The Maryland Historical Magazine Ernest L. Scott Jr., Editor Robert I. Cottom Jr., Associate Editor Patricia Dockman Anderson, Associate Editor Jessica M. Pigza, Managing Editor Jeff Goldman, Photographer Angela Anthony, Robin Donaldson Coblentz, Christopher T.George, Jane Gushing Lange, and Lama S. Rice, Editorial Associates Robert J. Brugger, Consulting Editor Regional Editors John B. Wiseman, Frostburg State University Jane G. Sween, Montgomery Gounty Historical Society Pegram Johnson III, Accoceek, Maryland John R. Wennersten, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore Acting as an editorial board, the Publications Committee of the Maryland Historical Society oversees and supports the magazine staff. Members of the committee are: Robert J. Brugger, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Go-Ghair John W. Mitchell, Upper Marlboro; Trustee, Go-Ghair Joseph L. Arnold, University of Maryland, Baltimore Gounty Jean H. Baker, Goucher Gollege James H. Bready, Baltimore Lois Green Garr, St. Mary's Gity Gommission Stiles Tuttle Golwill, Baltimore Richard R. Duncan, Georgetown University Dennis A. Fiori, Maryland Historical Society, ex-officio Jack G. Goellner, The Johns Hopkins University Press Gilbert Gude, Bethesda David Hein, Hood Gollege John Higham, The Johns Hopkins University Ronald Hoffman, Institute of Early American History and Gulture Samuel Hopkins, Baltimore Gharles McG. Mathias, Ghevy Ghase Roland G. McGonnell, Morgan State University Norvell E. Miller III, Baltimore Edward G. Papenfuse, Maryland State Archives The views and conclusions expressed in this magazine are those of the authors. The editors are responsible for the decision to make them public.
    [Show full text]
  • The Macgill--Mcgill Family of Maryland
    SEP i ma The MaCgÍll - McGill Family of Maryland A Genealogical Record of over 400 years Beginning 1537, ending 1948 GENEALOGICAL SOCIETÏ OP THE CHURCH OF JlSUS CMOlSI OP UT7Sfc.DAY SAMS DATE MICROFILMED ITEM PROJECT and G. S. Compiled ROLL # CALL # by John McGill 1523 22nd St., N. W Washington, D. C. Copyright 1948 by John McGill Macgill Coat-of-Arms Arms, Gules, three martlets, argent. Crest, a phoenix in flames, proper. Supporters, dexter (right) a horse at liberty, argent, gorged with a collar with a chain thereto affixed, maned and hoofed or, sinister (left) a bull sable, collared and chained as the former. Motto: Sine Fine (meaning without end). Meaning of colors and symbols Gules (red) signifies Military Fortitude and Magnanimity. Argent (silver) signifies Peace and Sincerety. Or (gold) signifies Generosity and Elevation of Mind. Sable (black) signifies Constancy. Proper (proper color of object mentioned). The martlet or swallow is a favorite device in European heraldry, and has assumed a somewhat unreal character from the circumstance that it catches its food on the wing and never appears to light on the ground as other birds do. It is depicted in armory always with wings close and in pro­ file, with no visable legs or feet. The martlet is the appropriate "differ­ ence" or mark of cadency for the fourth son. It is modernly used to signify, as the bird seldom lights on land, so younger brothers have little land to rest on but the wings of their own endeavor, who, like the swallows, become the travellers in their season.
    [Show full text]
  • Accounts of Debates in the House of Commons, March–April 1731, Supplementary to the Diary of the First Earl of Egmont
    Accounts of Debates in the House of Commons, March–April 1731, Supplementary to the Diary of the First Earl of Egmont D. W. Hayton Introduction John Perceval (1683–1748), fourth baronet, of Burton Hall, near Kanturk in County Cork, created first Baron Perceval (in 1715), first Viscount Perceval (1723) and first Earl of Egmont (1733) in the Irish peerage, sat in the British House of Commons for the government borough of Harwich in the parliament of 1727–34, and left to posterity a diary containing accounts of debates in the Commons which constitute the best source for parliamentary proceedings during the period of Sir Robert Walpole’s prime ministership.1 This was published by the Historical Manuscripts Commission in three volumes between 1905 and 1909, as appendices to its sixteenth report.2 Elsewhere in Perceval’s large personal archive in the British Library other examples survive of the diarist’s craft and some of these have been published: in 1962 Robert McPherson edited the ‘journal’ compiled by Perceval from notes, minutes and papers while he was a trustee of the Georgia Society in the 1730s;3 in 1969 Aubrey Newman printed fragments from 1749–51 and 1760, illustrating the politics of the ‘Leicester House’ faction, with which Perceval was involved;4 in 1982 the present author published excerpts relating to Irish parliamentary proceedings in 1711 and 1713 from a ‘journal of public affairs’ kept by Perceval between 1711 and 1718;5 and in 1989 Mark Wenger edited Perceval’s diary of his travels in 1701 as a young man through the eastern and northern counties of England.6 Occasional references in the Historical Manuscripts Commission volumes indicate that Perceval had compiled other accounts of events – specifically of parliamentary debates – and forwarded them in correspondence.
    [Show full text]