223 Genus Eresina Aurivillius

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

223 Genus Eresina Aurivillius AFROTROPICAL BUTTERFLIES. MARK C. WILLIAMS. http://www.lepsocafrica.org/?p=publications&s=atb Updated 29 December 2020. Genus Eresina Aurivillius, [1899] Tree Buffs In: Aurivillius, [1898-9]. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapakademiens Handlingar 31 (5): 253, 282 (1- 561). Type-species: Durbania corynetes Grose-Smith & Kirby, by original designation. The genus Eresina belongs to the Family Lycaenidae Leach, 1815; Subfamily Poritiinae Doherty, 1886; Tribe Liptenini Röber, 1892. The other genera in the Tribe Liptenini in the Afrotropical Region are Liptena, Obania, Kakumia, Tetrarhanis, Falcuna, Larinopoda, Micropentila, Pseuderesia, Eresiomera, Parasiomera, Citrinophila, Argyrocheila, Teriomima, Euthecta, Baliochila, Cnodontes, Congdonia, Eresinopsides, Toxochitona, Mimacraea and Mimeresia. Eresina (Tree Buffs) is a purely Afrotropical genus containing 20 species. Colonies of species belonging to this forest-genus are usually strongly associated with specific tall forest trees containing nests of species of cocktail (Crematogaster) ants. The ant nests are often high up, in the forest canopy (Larsen, 1991c). Specimens fly high up, never much more than half a metre from the tree trunk, in the vicinity of the hanging ant nests, with a rapid fluttering flight. They spend long periods on the wing but rest on the tree trunks or on vines if the sun is obscured by clouds. Particular ant-trees may be frequented for years on end. Despite their presumed sedentary nature many species have a vast distributional range, from West Africa to the Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda (Collins & Larsen, in Larsen, 2005a). The various species can be told apart when compared as series but single specimens require genitalic dissection in order to be identified. They appear to be associated with more open forest and some species, at least, are more active shortly after dawn (06h00 to 07h30). *Eresina bergeri Stempffer, 1956 Eresina bergeri Stempffer, 1956. Annales du Musée Royal du Congo Belge (8) (Sciences zoologique) 49: 12 (54 pp.). Eresina bergeri Stempffer, 1956. d’Abrera, 2009: 642. Type locality: [Democratic Republic of Congo]: “Kapanga, Lualaba”. Distribution: Democratic Republic of Congo (Lualaba), Congo ?, Uganda, Tanzania (north-west). Specific localities: Democratic Republic of Congo – Kapanga, Lualaba (TL); Ituri Forest (Ducarme, 2018); Mt Mitumba (Ducarme, 2018). Tanzania – Kere Hill and Bulembe in Minziro Forest (Congdon & Collins, 1998); Kikuru Forest (Congdon & Collins, 1998). Habitat: Dense, primary forest. Habits: See remarks under the genus, above. Early stages: Nothing published. Larval food: Nothing published. *Eresina bilinea Talbot, 1935 Eresina bilinea Talbot, 1935. Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine 71: 73 (69-78, 115-127, 147-153). Eresina bilinea Talbot, 1935. d’Abrera, 2009: 642. 1 Eresina bilinea. Male. Left – upperside; right – underside. Zambezi Rapids, Ikelenge, Zambia. 29 March 2007. A. Gardiner. Images M. Williams ex Gardiner Collection. Eresina bilinea. Female. Left – upperside; right – underside. Zambezi Rapids, Ikelenge, Zambia. 17 April 2002. A. Gardiner. Images M. Williams ex Gardiner Collection. Type locality: [Kenya]: “Kavirondo, Kakamega”. Distribution: Democratic Republic of Congo (north-east), Uganda, Kenya (west), Tanzania (north- west), Zambia. Specific localities: Democratic Republic of Congo – Ituri Forest (Ducarme, 2018); Mt Mitumba (Ducarme, 2018); Mt Blue (Ducarme, 2018). Kenya – Kakamega Forest (TL). Tanzania – Kere Hill, Minziro Forest (Congdon & Collins, 1998). Zambia – Ikelenge (Heath et al., 2002); Lisombo Stream, Mwinilunga (male illustrated above). Habitat: Dense, primary forest. Habits: See remarks under the genus, above. This appears to be a very scarce butterfly (Larsen, 1991c). Early stages: Nothing published. Larval food: Nothing published. *Eresina conradti Stempffer, 1956 Eresina conradti Stempffer, 1956. Annales du Musée Royal du Congo Belge (8) (Sciences zoologique) 49: 27 (54 pp.). Eresina conradti Stempffer, 1956. d’Abrera, 2009: 642. Type locality: Cameroon: “Johann Albrechts, Hôhe Station”. Distribution: Cameroon, Uganda, Tanzania (north-west). Specific localities: Cameroon – Johann Albrechts, Hôhe Station (TL). Tanzania – Kere Hill in Minziro Forest (Congdon & Collins, 1998); Kikuru Forest (Congdon & Collins, 1998); Rumanyika Game Reserve (Congdon & Collins, 1998). Habitat: Dense, primary forest. Habits: Unlike most species of the genus it can be found away from tree trunks, often close to the ground in darker parts of the forest (Congdon & Collins, 1998). 2 Early stages: Nothing published. Larval food: Nothing published. *Eresina cornucopiae (Holland, 1892) Durbania cornucopiae Holland, 1892. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (6) 10: 285 (284-294). Pseuderesia cornucopiae (Holland, 1892). Aurivillius, in Seitz, 1908-1925. Eresiomera cornucopiae (Holland, 1892). Ackery et al., 1995. Eresina cornucopiae (Holland, 1892). Collins & Larsen, 2008: 48, comb. nov. Eresina cornucopiae Holland, 1892. d’Abrera, 2009: 642. The female upperside (left) and underside (right) of the type of Eresiomera cornucopiae in the Carnegie Museum, Pittsburgh. Image courtesy Torben Larsen. Type locality: Gabon: “Upper valley of the Ogové (Ogowé)”. Distribution: Gabon. Specific localities: Gabon – upper valley of the Ogove River (TL). Early stages: Nothing published. Larval food: Nothing published. *Eresina corynetes (Grose-Smith & Kirby, [1890]) Durbania (?) corynetes Grose-Smith & Kirby, [1890]. In Grose-Smith & Kirby, [1887-92]. Rhopalocera exotica, being illustrations of new, rare and unfigured species of butterflies 1: 47 (183 pp.). London. Eresina corynetes Grose-Smith & Kirby, 1890. d’Abrera, 2009: 641. Type locality: Cameroon: “Barombi, Cameroons”. General remarks: Known only from two males (Collins & Larsen, in Larsen, 2005a). Distribution: Cameroon (west), Gabon (Collins & Larsen, in Larsen, 2005a). Specific localities: Cameroon – Barombi (TL). Gabon – Ogowe (Vande weghe, 2010). Habitat: Dense, primary forest. Habits: See remarks under the genus, above. Early stages: Nothing published. Larval food: Nothing published. *Eresina crola Talbot, 1935 Eresina crola Talbot, 1935. Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine 71: 73 (69-78, 115-127, 147-153). Eresina crola Talbot, 1935. d’Abrera, 2009: 643. 3 Type locality: Uganda: “S.W. Uganda: Kigezi district. In forest strip near mouth of Ntungwe River, Lake Edward”. Distribution: Uganda, Kenya (west). Specific localities: Uganda – Ntungwe River mouth, Kigezi (TL). Kenya – South Kavironda (a manuscript record by Van Someren, vide Larsen, 1991c). Habitat: Dense, primary forest. Habits: See remarks under the genus, above. Early stages: Nothing published. Larval food: Nothing published. *Eresina fontainei Stempffer, 1956 Fontaine’s Eresina Eresina fontainei Stempffer, 1956. Annales du Musée Royal du Congo Belge (8) (Sciences zoologique) 49: 18 (54 pp.). Eresina fontainei Stempffer, 1956. d’Abrera, 2009: 642. Type locality: [Democratic Republic of Congo]: “Katako Kombe, Sankuru, Congo Belge”. Distribution: Sierra Leone, Ivory Coast, ?Nigeria, Cameroon, Democratic Republic of Congo (Sankuru), Uganda, Kenya (west), Tanzania (north-west). Larsen (2005a) states that the species may not even be West African, since material from this region has not been positively identified. Specific localities: Democratic Republic of Congo – Katako Kombe, Sankuru (TL). Tanzania – Kere Hill, in Minziro Forest (Congdon & Collins, 1998). Habitat: Dense, primary forest. Habits: See remarks under the genus, above. This is a scarce and local butterfly (Larsen, 1991c). Early stages: Nothing published. Larval food: Nothing published. *Eresina fusca (Cator, 1904) Cator’s Eresina Pseuderesia fusca Cator, 1904. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (7) 13: 75 (73-76). Eresina fusca Cator, 1904. d’Abrera, 2009: 642. Type locality: Sierra Leone: “Sierra Leone”. Distribution: Sierra Leone, Liberia, Ivory Coast, ?Nigeria. The Nigerian record is based on Knoop but may refer to Eresina pseudofusca (Larsen, 2005a). Specific localities: Liberia – Wologizi (Safian et al., 2020). Ivory Coast – Banco (Larsen, 2005a); Tai (Larsen, 2005a); Alepe (Larsen, 2005a). Habitat: Dense, primary forest. Habits: See remarks under the genus, above. Early stages: Nothing published. Larval food: Nothing published. *Eresina jacksoni Stempffer, 1961 Jackson’s Eresina Eresina jacksoni Stempffer, 1961. Annales Musée Royal de l’Afrique Centrale (8) 94: 48 (73 pp.). Eresina jacksoni Stempffer, 1961. d’Abrera, 2009: 643. 4 Type locality: Uganda: “Toro, Mpanga Forest”. Distribution: Sierra Leone (Stempffer, 1961), Ivory Coast (Warren-Gash), Nigeria (south and east), Cameroon, Gabon, Democratic Republic of Congo, Uganda, Kenya (west). Specific localities: Ivory Coast – Banco (Warren-Gash). Cameroon – Korup (Larsen, 2005a). Gabon – Mikongo, Lope N.P. (Vande weghe, 2010). Democratic Republic of Congo – Ituri Forest (Ducarme, 2018); Mt Mitumba (Ducarme, 2018). Uganda – Mpanga Forest, Toro (TL). Habitat: Dense, primary forest. Habits: See remarks under the genus, above. Early stages: Nothing published. Larval food: Nothing published. *Eresina katangana Stempffer, 1956 Eresina katangana Stempffer, 1956. Annales du Musée Royal du Congo Belge (8) (Sciences zoologique) 49: 15 (54 pp.). Eresina katangana Stempffer, 1956. d’Abrera, 2009: 644. Eresina katangana. Male. Left – upperside; right – underside. Zambezi Rapids, Ikelenge, Zambia. 18 April 2002. A. Gardiner. Images M. Williams ex Gardiner Collection. Eresina katangana. Female. Left –
Recommended publications
  • Check-List of the Butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in Western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea)
    Nachr. entomol. Ver. Apollo, N. F. 25 (4): 161–174 (2004) 161 Check-list of the butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) Lars Kühne, Steve C. Collins and Wanja Kinuthia1 Lars Kühne, Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany; email: [email protected] Steve C. Collins, African Butterfly Research Institute, P.O. Box 14308, Nairobi, Kenya Dr. Wanja Kinuthia, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museums of Kenya, P.O. Box 40658, Nairobi, Kenya Abstract: All species of butterflies recorded from the Kaka- list it was clear that thorough investigation of scientific mega Forest N.R. in western Kenya are listed for the first collections can produce a very sound list of the occur- time. The check-list is based mainly on the collection of ring species in a relatively short time. The information A.B.R.I. (African Butterfly Research Institute, Nairobi). Furthermore records from the collection of the National density is frequently underestimated and collection data Museum of Kenya (Nairobi), the BIOTA-project and from offers a description of species diversity within a local literature were included in this list. In total 491 species or area, in particular with reference to rapid measurement 55 % of approximately 900 Kenyan species could be veri- of biodiversity (Trueman & Cranston 1997, Danks 1998, fied for the area. 31 species were not recorded before from Trojan 2000). Kenyan territory, 9 of them were described as new since the appearance of the book by Larsen (1996). The kind of list being produced here represents an information source for the total species diversity of the Checkliste der Tagfalter des Kakamega-Waldschutzge- Kakamega forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Africa's Gulf of Guinea Forests: Biodiversity Patterns and Conservation Priorities
    Advances in Applied Biodiversity Science, no. 6 AABSAdvances in Applied Biodiversity Science Number 6 Africa’s Gulf of Guinea Forests: Africa’s Gulf of Guinea Forests:Biodiversity Patterns and Conservation Africa’s Biodiversity Patterns and Conservation Priorities John F. Oates, Richard A. Bergl, and Joshua M. Linder Priorities C Conservation International ONSERVATION 1919 M Street, NW, Suite 600 Washington, DC 20036 TEL: 202-912-1000 FAX: 202-912-0772 I NTERNATIONAL ISBN 1-881173-82-8 WEB: www.conservation.org 9 0 0 0 0> www.biodiversityscience.org 9781881173823 About the Authors John F. Oates is a CABS Research Fellow, Professor of Anthropology at Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY), and a Senior Conservation Advisor to the Africa program of the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS). He is cur- rently advising WCS on biodiversity conservation projects in eastern Nigeria and western Cameroon. Dr. Oates has conducted research on the ecology of forest primates in Africa and Asia since 1966, and has assisted with the development of rainforest protected areas in South India and West Africa. He has published extensively on primate biology and conservation and, as an active member of the IUCN-SSC Primate Specialist Group, has compiled conservation action plans for African primates. He holds a PhD from the University of London. Richard A. Bergl is a doctoral student in anthropology at the CUNY Graduate Center, in the graduate training program of the New York Consortium in Evolutionary Primatology (NYCEP). He is currently conducting research into the population and habitat viability of the Cross River gorilla (Gorilla gorilla diehli) in Nigeria and Cameroon.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Job Training of Park Rangers: a Machinery for Sustainable Eco-Tourism in Nigeria Empirics of Cross River National Park
    International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 10, Issue 8, August-2019 122 ISSN 2229-5518 ON THE JOB TRAINING OF PARK RANGERS: A MACHINERY FOR SUSTAINABLE ECO-TOURISM IN NIGERIA EMPIRICS OF CROSS RIVER NATIONAL PARK Oba Demitrus O. 1; Prince-Charles O2.; Eteng Edet E.3 & Eyo Bassey B.4 1Department of Tourism Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Calabar, Nigeria E-mail: [email protected] 2,3,4Department of Geography and Environmental Science, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, University of Calabar, Nigeria E-mail: - [email protected] ABSTRACT A park ranger is saddled with the responsibility of protecting and preserving protected parklands, so that in the process of time, the natural ecosystem is protected from natural disasters that occasionally threaten human existing. Therefore, the study aim is to evaluate on-the-job training of park rangers as a machinery for sustainable eco-tourism development in Cross River National Park. The geographicIJSER scope is the Oban Hill and Okwanwo Divisions of the Cross River National Park. Data for the study was sourced from both primary and secondary means, while interviews, questionnaire administration and Focus Group Division (FGD) were instrument for data collection. The study findings among others revealed that Park rangers were facing the following challenges; illegal poaching by the locals, land encroachment, poor funding, lack of adequate modern security equipment, low man power and inadequate on-the-job training of park rangers. It was therefore, recommended that alternative sources of livelihood should be provided for the support zone communities to discourage illegal poaching and farming activities within the park.
    [Show full text]
  • (Piliocolobus Preussi) in Nigeria
    Abanyam Proceedings of 6th NSCB Biodiversity Conference; Uniuyo 2018 (268 - 272pp) Distribution and Conservation of the Preuss’s Red Colobus (Piliocolobus preussi) in Nigeria ABANYAM, Peter Atuaka Wildlife Conservation Society, State Housing Estate Calabar, Cross River State Nigeria. Correspondence: [email protected]; +2348067722028 Abstract: Preuss’s red colobus (Piliocolobus preussi) is listed as critically endangered by IUCN, its survival threatened by hunting and habitat loss. P. preussi is endemic to Nigeria and Cameroon. In Nigeria, it is known only from the Oban Division of Cross River National Park (CRNP). However, few surveys of P. preussi have been conducted in Nigeria and information on its current distribution and abundance within the Park is limited. Although CRNP is arguably the richest site in Nigeria, it has been poorly protected and neglected for many years and hunting is widespread. In 2016, WCS helped reorganize the ranger program in Oban and established a new law enforcement monitoring system based on the Spatial Monitoring and Reporting Tool (SMART). Since the introduction of SMART in Oban, effectiveness of law enforcement patrols has improved and encounter rate of hunting signs such as wire snares, hunting camps, and empty cartridges declined in the areas patrolled. Encounter rate of wire snares declined from 1.44/km in 2015 to 0.01/km in 2017, encounter rate of hunting camps declined from 0.03 /km in 2015 to 0.01/km in 2017, and encounter rate of empty shotgun cartridges from 0.88/km in 2015 to 0.17/km in 2017. Presence data collected by ranger patrols is used to monitor abundance and distribution of P.
    [Show full text]
  • Ikpan Wetland Rainforest: an Area of High Biodiversity Importance in South-Eastern Nigeria
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by I-Revues IKPAN WETLAND RAINFOREST: AN AREA OF HIGH BIODIVERSITY IMPORTANCE IN SOUTH-EASTERN NIGERIA EdernA. ENIANG1 & Luca LUISELLI2 RÉSUMÉ Un inventaire détaillé des mammifères, reptiles et amphlbiens a été conduit dans les zones humides et de forêt de terre ferme du bloc forestier d'Ikpan (Cross River State, sud-est du Nigéria) durant la période 1998-2001. Les prospections ont montré que l'Ikpan Forest, bien que formellement non protégée tant au niveau régional qu'au plan national, héberge une remarquable biodiversité qui inclut de nombreux vertébrés de grand intérêt écologique et biogéographlque et qui sont importants en termes de conservation. Parmi les mammifères, les taxons les plus importants sont les primates ( 11 espèces différentes dont Mandrillus leucophaeus, Pan troglodytes, Procolobius badius preussi), les éléphants et les buffles de forêt et beaucoup d'ongulés. Des lamantins et des panthères sont vraisemblablement aussi présents. Parmi les reptiles, Osteolaemus tetraspis, Kinixys spp., Va ranus niloticus omatus, Python sebae, et des caméléons sont particulièrement importants du point de vue de la conservation. De plus, cette forêt abrite une remarquable diversité d'espèces de serpents (27) et d'amphibiens (27), dont beaucoup sont de bons indicateurs de qualité écologique forestière et certaines n'avaient fait l'objet jusqu'ici que de rares mentions au Nigéria (e.g. les anoures Bufo superciliaris et Conraua crassipes). La zone montre de grandes potentialités en matière de conservation et de développement durable (écotourisme) mais doit être soigneusement gérée dans les toutes prochaines années pour éviter les effets négatifs de l'exploitation forestière, de la chasse locale, de l'agriculture et de la pêche à la dynamite.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Tidal Regimes in Relation to Industrial Activities on The
    International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies 2015; 2(6): 123-127 ISSN: 2347-5129 (ICV-Poland) Impact Value: 5.62 Influence of tidal regimes in relation to industrial (GIF) Impact Factor: 0.352 activities on the hydrodynamics of the Calabar River IJFAS 2015; 2(6): 123-127 © 2015 IJFAS system in Southern Nigeria www.fisheriesjournal.com Received: 27-05-2015 Accepted: 24-06-2015 Job Bassey E., Eyo O. Edet, Ekene P. Iwuagwu Job Bassey E. Marine Biology Department, Abstract Faculty of Marine Science, The Cross River system is formed from numerous tributaries arising from the Western slopes of the University of Calabar, Calabar, Cameroon Mountains which have two spurs into Nigeria as the Oban Hills in the south and the Obudu Nigeria. Hills in the North. A field study was conducted during a single expedition at designated locations to study the influence of tidal regimes in relation to industrial activities on hydrodynamics of Cross River Eyo O. Edet system between 10th and 11th August, 2009 during the high and low tidal regimes using the Institute of Department of Soil Science, Oceanography Research Vessel "Plankton Fisher". The locations used for the studies were CALCEMCO Faculty of Agriculture, (now UNICEM) jetty, Intels Jetty (left and right Flanks), Calabar/Creek Town entry route, TINAPA University of Calabar, Calabar, Jetty, Adiabo Bridge and Adiabo-Okurikang (control location). River depths and flow velocity were Nigeria taken in-situ along designated stations using an automated eco-sounding device (for depth), and stop- Ekene P. Iwuagwu watch and un-juiced orange fruit as floater (for flow velocity).
    [Show full text]
  • The Biodiversity of Atewa Forest
    The Biodiversity of Atewa Forest Research Report The Biodiversity of Atewa Forest Research Report January 2019 Authors: Jeremy Lindsell1, Ransford Agyei2, Daryl Bosu2, Jan Decher3, William Hawthorne4, Cicely Marshall5, Caleb Ofori-Boateng6 & Mark-Oliver Rödel7 1 A Rocha International, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke St, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK 2 A Rocha Ghana, P.O. Box KN 3480, Kaneshie, Accra, Ghana 3 Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum A. Koenig (ZFMK), Adenauerallee 160, D-53113 Bonn, Germany 4 Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3RB, UK 5 Department ofPlant Sciences, University ofCambridge,Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK 6 CSIR-Forestry Research Institute of Ghana, Kumasi, Ghana and Herp Conservation Ghana, Ghana 7 Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Invalidenstr. 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany Cover images: Atewa Forest tree with epiphytes by Jeremy Lindsell and Blue-moustached Bee-eater Merops mentalis by David Monticelli. Contents Summary...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Recent history of Atewa Forest................................................................................................................................... 9 Current threats
    [Show full text]
  • Nationally Threatened Species for Uganda
    Nationally Threatened Species for Uganda National Red List for Uganda for the following Taxa: Mammals, Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians, Butterflies, Dragonflies and Vascular Plants JANUARY 2016 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research team and authors of the Uganda Redlist comprised of Sarah Prinsloo, Dr AJ Plumptre and Sam Ayebare of the Wildlife Conservation Society, together with the taxonomic specialists Dr Robert Kityo, Dr Mathias Behangana, Dr Perpetra Akite, Hamlet Mugabe, and Ben Kirunda and Dr Viola Clausnitzer. The Uganda Redlist has been a collaboration beween many individuals and institutions and these have been detailed in the relevant sections, or within the three workshop reports attached in the annexes. We would like to thank all these contributors, especially the Government of Uganda through its officers from Ugandan Wildlife Authority and National Environment Management Authority who have assisted the process. The Wildlife Conservation Society would like to make a special acknowledgement of Tullow Uganda Oil Pty, who in the face of limited biodiversity knowledge in the country, and specifically in their area of operation in the Albertine Graben, agreed to fund the research and production of the Uganda Redlist and this report on the Nationally Threatened Species of Uganda. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREAMBLE .......................................................................................................................................... 4 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Birds of Korup National Park and Korup Project Area, Southwest Province, Cameroon PAUL G
    Bird Conservation International (1994) 4:1-68 The birds of Korup National Park and Korup Project Area, Southwest Province, Cameroon PAUL G. RODEWALD, PIERRE-ANDRE DEJAIFVE and ARTHUR A. GREEN Summary A total of 390 bird species are known to occur in the Korup National Park (KNP) and the surrounding Korup Project Area (KPA). Although the avifauna of KNP is incom- pletely known, it is already among the most ornithologically diverse lowland forest sites in Africa. The avian diversity of the KPA is increased by the montane forest bird species of the Rumpi Hills Forest Reserve (RHFR) and the Nta Ali Forest Reserve (NAFR). The lowland and montane forests of the KNP/KPA are very important to the conservation of African forest birds. Four species found in the Korup area are considered globally threatened, and four are considered near-threatened. In addition, 40 species were consid- ered for threatened status, some of which are likely future additions to the threatened list. Twelve of Korup's 36 montane forest bird species are endemic to the montane areas of western Cameroon, eastern Nigeria, and Bioko (Fernando Po). The RHFR is especially important as a refuge for montane birds because much of the montane forest elsewhere in western Cameroon has been cleared for agriculture. Breeding phenology data are provided for many lowland forest species. Additionally, this report provides information on many rarely recorded species for western Cameroon, including several species not previously documented in the region. Kemp's Longbill Macrosphenus ketnpi was recorded for the first time in Cameroon. Because it is sympatric with the Yellow Longbill M.
    [Show full text]
  • Metamorphosis Vol 26 I -Xl Obituary T.B. Larsen.Pdf
    Volume 26 METAMORPHOSIS ISSN 1018–6490 (PRINT) LEPIDOPTERISTS’ SOCIETY OF AFRICA ISSN 2307–5031 (ONLINE) OBITUARY – TORBEN BJORN LARSEN 12th January 1944 – 21st May 2015 Nancy Fee and Steve Collins i Volume 26 METAMORPHOSIS ISSN 1018–6490 (PRINT) LEPIDOPTERISTS’ SOCIETY OF AFRICA ISSN 2307–5031 (ONLINE) INTRODUCTION Torben Larsen was a man who lived a full life and inspired and befriended many people. He was a multi- faceted man: scientist, lepidopterist, taxonomist, conservationist, economist, sociologist, author, raconteur, husband, brother and uncle. He had experience far beyond his 71 years, and had an unquenchable thirst for knowledge and discovery. He considered himself a citizen of the world and was a mentor to so many, sharing his love of Lepidoptera and the natural world with all those who shared his passion. CHRONOLOGY In his book “Hazards of Butterfly Collecting” (2003) Torben provided a brief chronology of his life: 1944 - I was born 12 January in Jægersborg, Copenhagen, Denmark. My sister Birgit was born in 1945, my brother Gunner in 1947. 1947 - I moved to Greece with parents, with my father working for UNRRA and then UNICEF, where he was one for the first full-time staff members. Already at this stage my father began stimulating a budding interest in Natural History and I even have quite specific memories of some butterflies. 1950 - I was sent to Denmark to begin my ‘academic career’, staying with my grandmother, who had a strong surplus of common sense. She thought that card games and chess were at least as important as school, and I am indebted to her for teaching me both.
    [Show full text]
  • 14 Tourism As a Catalyst for Hospitality Industry Development in Calabar, Nigeria in Recent Times Calabar Has Become a Tourism
    e-Review of Tourism Research (eRTR), Vol. 9, No. 1, 2011 http://ertr.tamu.edu/ EJA, EJA. I., OTU, JUDITH. E., NDOMAH, BERNADETTE. N., and EWA, EWA. E. Tourism as a Catalyst for Hospitality Industry Development in Calabar, Nigeria In recent times Calabar has become a tourism destination with great influence owing to its nu- merous tourism potentials . This paper seeks to highlight the catalytic role of tourism in hospital- ity industry development in Calabar with specific reference to the hotel industry as a sub-system in the hospitality industry. One hundred and twenty seven hotels were researched and seven hun- dred copies of questionnaires were administered to tourists in the various hotels. The results show a variation in the annual patronage of hotels in Calabar. The results also proved that tour- ism is one of the major vehicles for the growth of the hotel industry in Calabar. Keywords: Catalyst, Hotel Industry, Tourism, Development, Tourism Potentials EJA, EJA. I.1, OTU, JUDITH. E.2, NDOMAH, BERNADETTE. N.3 and EWA, EWA. E.4 1Department of Geography and Regional Planning, University of Calabar- Nigeria . Email: [email protected] 2Department of Sociology, University of Calabar, Calabar. Email: [email protected] 3Department of Geography, Federal College of Education Obudu, Cross River State –Nigeria. Email: [email protected] 4Department of Geography and Regional Planning, University of Calabar- Nigeria . Email: [email protected] 14 e-Review of Tourism Research (eRTR), Vol. 9, No. 1, 2011 http://ertr.tamu.edu/ Introduction Tourism is a socio-cultural phenomenon and it is a quiet revolution that has gradually swept through the world, in both developed and undeveloped nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Diversity of Zooplankton in the Great Kwa River, Cross River State, Nigeria
    International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064 Ecology and Diversity of Zooplankton in the Great Kwa River, Cross River State, Nigeria Eyo, Victor Oscar1, Andem, Andem Bassey2, Ekpo, Paul Bassey3 1 Institute of Oceanography, University of Calabar, P.M.B.1115 Calabar, Nigeria 2Department of Zoology and Environmental Biology, University of Calabar, P.M.B.1115 Calabar, Nigeria 3Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, University of Calabar, P.M.B.1115 Calabar, Nigeria Abstract: Ecology and diversity of zooplankton in the Great Kwa River, located in Cross River state (Southern Nigeria) was studied based on bi-monthly samples collected for six months (May to October, 2012). The objective of the study was to determine the abundance and species composition of zooplankton from four sampling stations in the study area. A total of forty-four (44) taxa belonging to seven (7) taxonomic groups were recorded: 1 Heterodonta and Salpid (2.27%), 2 Chaetognathans and Decapods (4.55%), 7 Rotifera (15.91%), 11 Cladocera (25.0%) and 20 Copepods (45.45%). Total number of species in relation to sampling stations was highest in Esuk Atu with 34 species (27.2%), followed by 33 species in Anantigha station (26.45), followed by 32 species in Obufa Esuk station (25.6%) and lowest in Abitu station with 26 species (20.8%). Absolutely constant species (AS) were found only in Cladocera (Daphnia magna, Daphnia pulex and Daphnia rosea) and Copepoda (Calanus calanus, Calanus fimnarchicus, Diaptomus gracilus, Enterpira autifrons, Enterpira elongatus, Paracalanus parvus and Pseudocalanus elongatus). Based on these findings, it could be concluded that the relatively high zooplankton species diversity in the Great Kwa River is an indication of the healthy state of the river.
    [Show full text]