Vol. 1, 637-642, June 1995 Clinical Cancer Research 637

N-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)retinamide (Fenretinide) in Combination with Enhances Differentiation and Retinoylation of Proteins

Noriko Takahashi,’ Edward A. Sausville, whether these effects, either singly or in combination, mediate and Theodore R. Breitman the anticarcinogenic and antiproliferative activities of 4-HPR. Although 4-HPR and RA share some activities, there is Laboratory of Biological Chemistry, Developmental Therapeutics Program, Division of Cancer Treatment, National Cancer Institute, evidence that they have divergent mechanisms of action. Thus, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-4255 4-HPR induces apoptosis in HL-60 and NB4 human leukemia cell lines that are resistant to RA (16), binds poorly or not at all

to the RARs or the X receptors,3 ‘ and fails to trans- ABSTRACT activate the RARs or the a in chloramphen- The synthetic retinoid, N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide icol acetyltransferase assays.5 It generally is accepted that many (4-HPR; Fenretinide), is a cancer chemopreventive and an- effects of RA are mediated by these receptors (17) which tiproliferative agent whose mechanism of action is unknown. directly activate transcription of target genes by binding to 4-HPR alone is a poor inducer of differentiation of HL-60 specific DNA sequences. cells compared to all-trans-retinoic acid (RA). Here, we RA induces the differentiation of HL-60 cells to cells with found that combinations of 4-HPR and RA synergistically many functional and morphological characteristics of mature induced differentiation of HL-60 cells. In addition, 4-HPR granulocytes (18). In addition to the retinoid nuclear receptors, increased the level of retinoylation, the covalent binding of RA acylation (retinoylation) of proteins is a candidate mecha- RA to proteins. Retinoylation occurs in many eukaryotic cell nism for the effects of RA on cells (19, 20). We showed that lines and may be involved in RA-induced differentiation. retinoylation involves the formation of a covalent bond with These results suggest that 4-HPR may be a member of a preformed protein. The extent of retinoylation is dependent on class of that are active because they displace RA the initial concentration of RA in a saturable manner. Further- from extracellular and intracellular sites or because they more, with intact HL-60 cells the EDSt) values for RA-induced inhibit RA catabolism. On the basis of these proposed mech- differentiation and for retinoylation are similar. These results anisms, retinoids that do not cause differentiation as sole suggest that retinoylation may be involved in the mechanism by agents may have utility in the clinic in combination with RA. which HL-60 cells differentiate in the presence of RA. In a previous study, we found that Am80, a synthetic INTRODUCTION retinoid which is a ligand for the nuclear retinoid receptors, is 4-HPR2 is an effective chemopreventive (1) and antipro- covalently bound to protein at a very low level compared to RA liferative agent (2-8) for a wide variety of tumor types includ- and does not induce differentiation of HL-60 cells (20). How- ing those of the breast, prostate, ovary, and bladder. 4-HPR is in ever, Am80 increases the level of retinoylation, and combina- clinical trials for cancers of the breast (9) and the bladder (10). tions of RA with Am80 synergistically induce differentiation of A mechanism for the chemopreventative and antiprolifera- HL-60 cells. These findings are consistent with a covalent tive activities of 4-HPR is unknown. 4-HPR and RA compete modification of proteins by a retinoid playing a role in differ- with for binding to plasma retinol binding protein (11), entiation of HL-60 cells. inhibit the retinol-metabolizing enzymes lecithin-retinol acyl- In the present study, we have extended our earlier study transferase (12), acyl-CoA-dependent reductase (12), and with Am80 by examining the modulation by 4-HPR of RA- acyl CoA-retinol acyltransferase (13), and up-regulate RAR-3 induced differentiation and retinoylation in HL-60 cells. in normal mammary epithelial cells (14). In addition, 4-HPR impairs the secretion of the retinol-plasma retinol-binding pro- MATERIALS AND METHODS tein complex from liver and other tissues (15). It is unclear Cells. Early passage (<30) human myeloid leukemia cell line HL-60 (21) and HL-60(S), an HL-60 variant with enhanced sensitivity to RA (22) (provided by Dr. K. Shudo, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan) Received 1 1/16/94; accepted 2/3/95. were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium (GIBCO, Grand Island,

1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Laboratory of NY) supplemented with 10 msi 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-pipera- Biological Chemistry, Developmental Therapeutics Program, Division zinethane sulfonic acid (pH 7.3) and 10% FBS (v/v; GIBCO). of Cancer Treatment, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Building 37, Room SD-02, Bethesda, MD 20892-4255. 2 The abbreviations used are: 4-HPR, N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retin- amide (Fenretinide); RA, all-trans-retinoic acid; FBS, fetal bovine serum; CI, combination index; RAR, retinoic acid nuclear receptor; 3 A. A. Levin, personal communication. Am80, 4(5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-5,5,8,8-tetramethyl-2-naphthalenylcarbani- 4 M. Clagett-Dame, personal communication. oyl) benzoic acid. 5 P. G. Pelicci, unpublished observations cited in Ref. 16.

Downloaded from clincancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 1995 American Association for Cancer Research. 638 Enhancement of Differentiation and Retinoylation by 4-HPR

The population doubling times in medium containing 10% FBS were 17 h for HL-60(S) cells and 36 h for HL-60 cells. Cell I- cultures were incubated at 37#{176}Cin a humidified atmosphere of z

5% CO2 in air. C Cell Differentiation. Cells (2 X 105/ml for HL-60 and 0 to 2 X 104/ml for HL-60(S)) were grown in RPM! 1640 medium C containing various concentrations of either RA (Sigma Chemi- cal Co., St. Louis, MO) or 4-HPR (gift from Dr. R. C. Moon, Specialized Cancer Center, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL) and either 5% or 10% FBS (serum-containing medium) or 5 at p,g/ml of both insulin and transferrmn (serum-free medium). We

estimated cell number on an electronic particle counter (Coulter .0 to Electronics, Hialeah, FL), viability by trypan blue dye exclu- 5 sion, and differentiation by the capacity of the cells to reduce nitroblue tetrazolium (23). Analysis of Combined Drug Effects. Isobologram anal- at ysis was the basis for analyzing the combined effects of 4-HPR .C

and RA on differentiation. The interaction of two inducers was 0 quantified by determining a CI value for each fixed concentra- a, tion ratio according to the classic isobologram equation (24): z

2301 = [(D)1/(Dj1] + [(D)2/(Dj2] CI Log Concentration, nM

where D is the dose required to produce an effect alone, and Fig. 1 Comparison of the effects of RA and 4-HPR on differentiation, viability, and growth of HL-60 cells. Cells (2 X 10/ml) were grown (D)1 and (D)2 are the doses of agents 1 and 2 in the mixture that with various concentrations of RA (0) or 4-HPR (El) in serum-free produce the same effect. This analysis generates the combina- medium (left panels) or in medium containing 10% FBS (right panels). tion effect as: summation (additivity or zero interaction) is Measurements were made at 92 h for cells growing in serum-free indicated when CI 1; synergism is indicated when CI < 1; medium and at 85 h for cells growing in medium containing serum. Each point is the mean of at least four measurements. The SE of each and antagonism is indicated when CI > 1. data point was 8% of the mean. Control cultures had a cell density of Retinoylation. HL-60 cells from exponentially growing 1.1 X 106/ml in serum-free medium and 1.02 X 106/ml in serum- cultures were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in containing medium. The values for percentage of net growth were serum-free medium. RA (Sigma) and [1 1,12-3H]RA (50 Ci/ calculated with the following formula: [(cell concentration of experi- mmol; Du Pont-New England Nuclear, Boston, MA) were dis- mental culture) - (initial cell concentration)/(cell concentration of con- trol culture) - (initial cell concentration)] X 100. solved in absolute ethanol and added to the growth medium. The final concentration of ethanol was no higher than 0.1%. HL-60 cells were grown for 24 h with 10 or 100 nt [3H]RA and various concentrations of radioinert 4-HPR or RA. greater in serum-free medium than in serum-containing medium Cells were harvested by centrifugation (200 X g for S mm) and (Fig. 1). washed extensively with phosphate-buffered NaCl solution (1.5 Differentiation induced by RA was associated with de- mM KH2PO4, 8.1 mM Na2HPO4, 136.9 mi NaC1, pH 7.2). The creased cell growth in either serum-free or serum-containing cell pellet was then extracted using the Bligh-Dyer procedure media (Fig. 1). We saw marked decreases in the percentage of X g (25) and centrifuged at 10,000 for S mm in a microcentri- viable cells only in serum-free medium containing 400 flM or 1 fuge. This extraction was repeated about five times or until there p.M RA. At 92 h, these two concentrations of RA induced 100% was <300 cpm/ml in the supernatant fraction. The delipidated differentiation, and viabilities were about 60% with 400 nM RA pellet was then dried in a centrifugal vacuum device (Savant, and 55% with 1 JiM RA (Fig. 1). At an earlier time (67 h), these Farmingdale, NY) and dissolved in 10% SDS solution. Radio- two concentrations of RA also induced 100% differentiation but activity was measured on a liquid scintillation spectrometer. with viabilities of 87% with 400 flM RA and 80% with 1 p,M RA Presentation of Results. Each experiment was per- that were much higher than at 92 h. These results indicate that formed at least twice, and most experiments were repeated at nonviable cells originated from a pool of viable mature cells and least three times with consistent results. are consistent with a report that RA-treated HL-60 cells die via apoptosis subsequent to differentiation (30). RESULTS Compared to RA, the decreased cell growth and viability Effects of RA and 4-HPR on Differentiation, Growth, by 4-HPR in serum-free medium were not coupled as closely to and Viability of HL-60 Cells. We found that 4-HPR was cell differentiation (Fig. 1). The marked decrease in viability much less active than RA in inducing differentiation of HL-60 with 4-HPR at concentrations >400 flM in serum-free medium cells (Fig. 1). These results are in agreement with previous precluded determinations of differentiation with the nitroblue reports using either serum-free (26, 27) or serum-containing tetrazolium assay, which requires live cells (23). media (16, 28, 29). The induction of differentiation, decrease in In serum-containing medium, we saw about 40% differen- viability, and inhibition of growth by either RA or 4-HPR were tiation with 4 p.M 4-HPR (Fig. 1). The percentage of viable cells

Downloaded from clincancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 1995 American Association for Cancer Research. Clinical Cancer Research 639

I- I- z z at at .C C 0 a) to to C C 0 a, to C 0 a, No 4-HPR

0 ;‘‘“; . 1 10 10 nM RA/’No RA RA Concentration, nM

Fig. 3 Differentiation by combinations of RA with 4-HPR of HL-60 10 100 1000 and HL-60(S) cells in medium containing serum. HL-60 cells (2 X l0 4-HPR Concentration, nM cells/ml) were grown in medium supplemented with 10% FBS. HL- Fig. 2 HL-60 cell differentiation in serum-free medium induced by 60(5) cells (2 x 104/ml) were grown in medium supplemented with 5% increasing concentrations of 4-HPR in the presence of fixed concentra- FBS. Each point is the mean of at least four measurements. The SE of tions of RA. Cells (2 X 10/ml) were grown for 92 h in serum-free each data point was 8% of the mean. medium with the indicated concentrations of RA and 4-HPR. Each point is the mean of at least four measurements. The SE of each data point was 8% of the mean. The isoboles (inset) are for combinations of 4-HPR with RA that are isoeffective (ED50) for differentiation of HL-60 cells. When there is additivity, the experimental values for a combination fall on the dashed line connecting the values for each agent alone. The ED50 value for 4-HPR alone was estimated by extrapolation. This value could not be determined experimentally because of low viability (see ‘‘Re- sults’ ‘). The viabilities were >85% for each of the other isoeffective conditions shown in the isobologram. I

was about 80%, and cell growth was inhibited about 50%. These latter results are not in agreement with those of Delia et a!. (16), 2040600 0 4 812 who found that during growth of HL-60 cells with 3 p.M 4-HPR RA Concentration, nM for 5 days there is no increase, and instead a decrease, in the Fig. 4 Isoboles for combinations of 4-HPR with RA that are isoeffec- concentration of viable cells. At 300 nt 4-HPR the level of tive for differentiation of HL-60 and HL-60(S) cells. The experimental growth inhibition seen by these workers was similar to what we points for HL-60 cells are the ED40 values calculated from Fig. 3. The saw with 4 JiM 4-HPR. Thus, one explanation for the apparent experimental points for HL-60(S) cells are the ED50 values calculated from Fig. 3, with the exception that a value for 4-HPR alone was not differences in results is that the concentrations of 4-HPR used obtained because of cytotoxicity. A ED50 value of 3 JiM for 4-HPR alone by Delia et a!. (16) are much higher than they report. Additional was estimated so that an additive isobole could be drawn. We assumed support for this explanation is that clonal proliferation of HL-60 that this value would be >1 p.M (Fig. 3) and less than the ED of 4 JiM cells is not inhibited by 1 p.M 4-HPR (29). found for HL-60 cells. Induction of Differentiation of HL-60 Cells by Combi- nations of RA and 4-HPR. Our findings that 4-HPR was a poor inducer of HL-60 cell differentiation (Fig. 1) prompted an examination of whether 4-HPR affected RA-induced differenti- cells (20). We found that 4-HPR was more toxic to HL-60(S) ation. than to HL-60 cells. Viability was 97% for HL-60(S) cultures In serum-free medium the dose-effect curves for 4-HPR exposed to 1 iM 4-HPR for 74 h and < 1% for cultures exposed were displaced to lower concentrations as a function of an to 4 LM 4-HPR. This toxicity limited to 1 p.M the maximum increase in the fixed concentration of RA (Fig. 2). The interac- concentration of 4-HPR that we could study. At this concentra- tion between 4-HPR and RA was visualized by constructing an tion, 4-HPR did not induce differentiation of HL-60(S) cells isobole (31) (Fig. 2, inset) and quantified by calculating a CI (Fig. 3). value (24). As show in Fig. 2, inset, the two isoeffective (ED50) With either HL-60 or HL-60(S) cells the dose-effect curves combinations of 4-HPR with RA were below and to the left of for RA were displaced to lower concentrations as a function of the summation (additive or zero interaction) isobole displayed increases in the fixed concentrations of 4-HPR (Fig. 3). The by the dashed line. The CI values for these combinations were isoboles drawn from the data in Fig. 3 show that isoeffective about 0.6, indicating moderately strong synergism. combinations of RA and 4-HPR were below and to the left of the We examined also the induction of differentiation of pa- summation isoboles (Fig. 4). The extent of this synergy was rental HL-60 and HL-60(S) cells by combinations of RA and estimated by determining CI values. The CI values at the ED40 4-HPR in medium containing serum (Fig. 3). HL-60(S) is about effect level for HL-60 cells were about 0.7. The CI values for 10-fold more sensitive to RA for differentiation than HL-60 HL-60(S) cells at the ED50 effect level were about 0.5. Viability

Downloaded from clincancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 1995 American Association for Cancer Research. 640 Enhancement of Differentiation and Retinoylation by 4-HPR

at the ED40 effect level for HL-60 cells was 78% with 4 JiM 4-HPR alone and >92% for the other three conditions (Fig. 4). Viability at the ED50 effect level for HL-60(S) cells was >94% for each of the three conditions with RA shown in Fig. 4. 0 C Modulation of Retinoylation of HL-60 Proteins by 0 0 4-HPR. Our findings that combinations of 4-HPR and RA at synergistically induced differentiation of HL-60 cell lines (Figs. C 0 100 2-4) prompted us to see whether these increased levels of Co >. 0 differentiation correlated with changes in the level of retinoy- C lation. The levels of retinoylation by two fixed concentrations of a, [3H]RA increased as a function of the concentration of 4-HPR (Fig. 5). We did not see any cytotoxicity during this relatively short 24-h exposure. In contrast to 4-HPR, the covalent binding Concentration, nM of [3H]RA to protein decreased, because of isotope dilution, as a function of the concentration of radioinert RA (Fig. 5). Fig. 5 Changes in the level of retinoylation by increasing concentra- tions of RA and 4-HPR. Cells (2 X 106/ml) were grown in serum-free medium for 24 h in the presence of 10 nM (0, El) or 100 nsi (#{149},) DISCUSSION [3H]RA and the indicated concentrations of radioinert RA (0, #{149})and Although 4-HPR is an effective cancer chemopreventive 4-HPR (LI, ). Covalently bound RA was determined in the residues as described in ‘ ‘ Materials and Methods.’ ‘ Values for the levels of reti- agent and cell growth inhibitor for a wide variety oftumor types, noylated protein with either 10 or 100 nsi [3H]RA alone were set to its mechanism of action is still elusive. Patients taking 4-HPR 100%. Results shown are from one experiment. Essentially the same have markedly decreased levels of plasma retinol-binding pro- results were seen in another experiment. tein and retinol (32), and many show effects associated with hypovitaminosis A (33). The ability of 4-HPR to compete with retinol for binding to plasma retinol-binding protein (1 1), to Another explanation for the increased protein retinoylation inhibit both lecithin-retinol acyltransferase and acyl-CoA-de- seen with 4-HPR is an elevation in the levels of one or more of pendent retinal reductase (12), and to impair the secretion of the the proteins that are substrates for retinoylation. The regulatory retinol-plasma retinol-binding protein complex from liver and subunit of cyclic AMP-dependent protein type II is one of the other tissues (15) may singly or in combination be the basis for major retinoylated proteins in HL-60 and MCF-7 cells (35, 36), the side effects in vivo. It is unclear whether one or more of and its level increases about 3-fold in mammary tumors growing these specific effects is involved in the therapeutic efficacy of in animals treated with 4-HPR (37). Thus, the increased levels 4-HPR. of retinoylation in the presence of 4-HPR may, in part, reflect an The accumulating evidence that 4-HPR does not bind to the increase in the amount of this regulatory protein. nuclear retinoid receptors35 prompted us to examine whether The inability of 4-HPR to inhibit retinoylation (Fig. 5) 4-HPR influenced the ability of RA to differentiate HL-60 cells. suggests strongly that 4-HPR may not compete with RA in the Previously, we found that the synthetic retinoid Am80 does not covalent modification of protein. We could not determine di- induce differentiation of HL-60 cells in serum-free medium, rectly whether 4-HPR covalently modifies proteins because of although it is a ligand for nuclear retinoid receptors (20). How- the unavailability of highly radioactive 4-HPR. Taken together ever, Am80 increases the level of retinoylation and potentiates with our previous observations with Am80, these results offer RA-induced differentiation of HL-60 cells (20). additional evidence that covalent modification of proteins by a In this study, we saw qualitatively similar results with retinoid may play a role in inducing differentiation of HL-60 4-HPR to those seen with Am80. Combinations of 4-HPR and cells. RA synergistically induced differentiation of HL-60 cells (Figs. Our results showing synergism in the induction of differ- 2-4), and 4-HPR increased the levels of retinoylation (Fig. 5). entiation of HL-60 cells by combinations of 4-HPR with RA We saw these effects of 4-HPR in the absence of serum (Figs. may have clinical utility. Plasma concentrations of about 1 JiM 2 and 5). Thus, retinol and retinol-binding protein, which are in are seen in patients receiving p.o. doses of either 4-HPR (32) or serum, are not obligatory for some of the effects of 4-HPR seen RA (38). These values indicate that combinations of 4-HPR and in this study. RA that we found to be synergistic are obtainable in patients. It On a cellular basis our results could be explained if 4-HPR may also be noteworthy that we saw synergistic effects with acted by a mechanism that increased the availability of RA for combinations of 4-HPR and RA at concentrations of RA that are either transcriptional regulation of RA responsive genes or for close to the physiological range of about 10 nM (39, 40). Thus, retinoylation of target proteins. In cells exposed to both RA and our results raise the possibility that biological effects of 4-HPR 4-HPR, 4-HPR may displace RA from sites where it is seques- in vivo may in part derive from influences on the effective tered. Another possibility is that 4-HPR alters the efficiency of biological availability of endogenous RA. This further raises the the cytochrome P450-mediated catabolism of RA to 4-hydroxy- prospect that the spectrum of cancers responding to 4-HPR may retinoic acid. This hydroxylation occurs in HL-60 cells (34). be greater if RA were combined with 4-HPR. In particular, However, we are not aware of any report that 4-HPR affects this 4-HPR may be useful in the treatment of acute promyelocytic reaction. Experiments to distinguish these possibilities are in leukemia or squamous neoplasms. Although cytodifferentiation progress. therapy by RA for acute promyelocytic leukemia patients is

Downloaded from clincancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 1995 American Association for Cancer Research. Clinical Cancer Research 641

encouraging, there are several limitations preventing better din- 9. Rotmensz, N., De Palo, G., Formelli, F., Costa, A., Marubini, E., ical outcomes. A high percentage of patients in complete remis- Campa, T., Crippa, A., Danesini, G. M., Delle Grottaglie, M., Di Mauro, M. G., Filiberti, A., Gallazzi, M., Guzzon, A., Magni, A., Malone, W., sion induced by RA alone relapse within a few months (41-43). Mariani, L., Palvarini, M., Perloff, M., Pizzichetta, M., and Veronesi, U. Most relapsed patients are resistant to further treatment with Long-term tolerability of fenretinide (4-HPR) in breast cancer patients. RA, although their leukemia cells may respond to RA in vitro Eur. J. Cancer, 27: 1127-1131, 1991. (43-45). 10. Decensi, A., Bruno, S., Costantini, M., Torrisi, R., Curotto, A., One explanation for the resistance of relapsing patients to Gatteschi, B., Nicolo, G., Polizzi, A., Perloff, M., Malone, W. F., and RA treatment is an increased systemic cytochrome P450-medi- Bruzzi, P. Phase Ila study of fenretinide in superficial bladder cancer, using DNA flow cytometry as an intermediate end point. J. NaIl. Cancer ated metabolism of RA. The rapid catabolism of RA makes it Inst.,86: 138-140, 1994. very difficult to maintain effective plasma levels of RA (44). 1 1 . Berni, R., and Formelli, F. In vitro interaction of fenretinide with Another explanation for RA resistance is at the cellular level. plasma retinol-binding protein and its functional consequences. FEBS Leukemic cells from patients treated with RA have increased Lett., 308: 43-45, 1992. levels of cellular RA-binding protein (45, 46). High levels of 12. Dew, S. E., Wardlaw, S. A., and Ong, D. E. Effects of pharmaco- this protein are associated with alterations in RA metabolism logical retinoids on several -metabolizing enzymes. Cancer Res., 53: 2965-2969, 1993. (47-49) and reduced cell differentiation (45, 50-52). Whatever 13. Ball, M. D., Furr, H. C., and Olson, J. A. Enhancement of acyl the reason (or reasons) for relapse, treatment with combinations coenzyme A:retinol acyltransferase in rat liver and mammary tumor of RA and 4-HPR may be one approach to lower the plasma tissue by retinyl acetate and its competitive inhibition by N-(4-hydroxy- levels of RA needed for clinical effects. It is likely that decreas- phenyl)retinamide. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 128: 7-1 1, 1985. ing the therapeutic concentrations of RA will also reduce the 14. Swisshelm, K., Ryan, K., Lee, X., Tsou, H. C., Peacocke, M., and induction of cytochrome P450-mediated catabolism of RA and Sager, R. Down-regulation of 3 in mammary of cellular RA-binding protein. carcinoma cell lines and its up-regulation in senescing normal mammary epithelial cells. Cell Growth & Differ., 5: 133-141, 1994. The experiments in this article lead to the hypothesis that 15. Smith, J. E., Lawless, D. C., Green, M. H., and Moon, R. C. clinical outcome in patients treated with RA may be modified by Secretion of vitamin A and retinol-binding protein into plasma is de- coadministration of a retinoid which alters the intracellular pressed in rats by N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide (fenretinide). J. Nutr., concentration or distribution of RA. This alteration results in an 122: 1999-2009, 1992. increased biological effect of RA, mediated either by nuclear 16. Delia, D., Aiello, A., Lombardi, L., Pelicci, P. G., Grignani, F., retinoid receptors or, as shown here, possibly by an increase in Grignani, F., Formelli, F., Menard, S., Costa, A., Veronesi, U., and the retinoylation of cellular target proteins. On the basis of these Pierotti, M. A. N-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)retinamide induces apoptosis of malignant hemopoietic cell lines including those unresponsive to reti- proposed mechanisms, many retinoids that are relatively mac- noic acid. Cancer Res., 53: 6036-6041, 1993. tive for differentiation as sole agents may have utility in the 17. Giguere, V. Retinoic acid receptors and cellular retinoid binding clinic in combination with RA. proteins: complex interplay in retinoid signaling. Endocr. Rev., 15: 61-79, 1994. REFERENCES 18. Breitman, T. R., Selonick, S. E., and Collins, S. J. Induction of differentiation of the human promyelocytic leukemia cell line (HL-60) 1. Moon, R. C., Mehta, R. G., and Rao, K. V. N. Retinoids and cancer by retinoic acid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 77: 2936-2940, 1980. in experimental animals. In: M. B., Sporn, A. B., Roberts, and D. S., 19. Takahashi, N., and Breitman, T. R. Retinoic acid acylation (reti- Goodman (eds.), Retinoids: Biology, Chemistry, and Medicine,, pp. noylation) of a nuclear protein in the human acute myeloid leukemia cell 573-595. New York: Raven Press, Ltd., 1994. line HL6O. J. Biol. Chem., 264: 5159-5163, 1989. 2. Pienta, K. J., Nguyen, N. M., and Lehr, J. E. Treatment of prostate 20. Takahashi, N., and Breitman, T. R. Induction of differentiation and cancer in the rat with the synthetic retinoid fenretinide. Cancer Res., 53: covalent binding to proteins by the synthetic retinoids Ch55 and Am80. 224-226, 1993. Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 314: 82-89, 1994. 3. Delany, A. M., and Brinckerhoff, C. E. The synthetic retinoid (4- 21. Collins, S. J., Gallo, R. C., and Gallagher, R. E. Continuous growth hydroxyphenyl)retinamide decreases collagen expression in vitro and in and differentiation of human myeloid leukaemic cells in suspension the tight-skin mouse. Arthritis Rheum., 36: 983-993, 1993. culture. Nature (Lond.), 270: 347-349, 1977. 4. Dowlatshahi, K., Mehta, R. G., Thomas, C. F., Dinger, N. M., and 22. Kagechika, H., Kawachi, E., Hashimoto, Y., and Shudo, K. New Moon, R. C. Therapeutic effect of N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide on type inducers of differentiation of human HL-60 promyelocytic leuke- N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-induced rat mammary cancer. Cancer Lett., 47: mia cells. Terephthalic anilides. Chem. Pharm. Bull. (Tokyo), 32: 187-192, 1989. 4209-4212, 1984. 5. Abou-Issa, H., Webb, T. E., Minton, J. P., and Moeschberger, M. 23. Breitman, T. R. Growth and differentiation of human myeloid Chemotherapeutic evaluation of glucarate and N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)reti- leukemia cell line HL6O. Methods Enzymol., 190: 118-130, 1990. namide alone and in combination in the rat mammary tumor model. J. 24. Berman, E., Duigou-Osterndorf, R., Krown, S. E., Fanucchi, M. P., Natl. Cancer Inst., 81: 1820-1823, 1989. Chou, J., Hirsch, M. S., Clarkson, B. D., and Chou, T-C. Synergistic 6. Meyskens, F. L., Jr., Alberts, D. S., and Salmon, S. E. Effect of cytotoxic effect of azidothymidine and recombinant interferon alpha on 13-cis-retinoic acid and 4-hydroxyphenyl-all-trans-retinamide on hu- normal human bone marrow progenitor cells. Blood, 74: 1281-1286, man tumor colony formation in soft agar. Int. J. Cancer, 32: 295-299, 1989. 1983. 25. Bligh, E. G., and Dyer, W. J. A rapid method of total lipid extrac- 7. Formelli, F., and Cleris, L. Synthetic retinoid fenretinide is effective tion and purification. Can. J. Biochem. Physiol., 37: 911-917, 1959. against a human ovarian carcinoma xenograft and potentiates cisplatin 26. Gallup, J. M., Barua, A. B., Furr, H. C., and Olson, J. A. Effects of activity. Cancer Res., 53: 5374-5376, 1993. retinoid beta-glucuronides and N-retinoyl amines on the differentiation 8. Igawa, M., Tanabe, T., Chodak, G. W., and Rukstalis, D. B. N-(4- of HL-60 cells in vitro. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 186: 269-274, 1987. hydroxyphenyl) retinamide induces cell cycle specific growth inhibition 27. Breitman, T. R. Induction of terminal differentiation of HL-60 and in PC3 cells. Prostate, 24: 299-305, 1994. fresh leukemic cells by retinoic acid. In: R. P. Revoltella, G. M. Pontieri,

Downloaded from clincancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 1995 American Association for Cancer Research. 642 Enhancement of Differentiation and Retinoylation by 4-HPR

C. Basilico, G. Rovera, R. C. Gallo, and J. H. Subak-Sharpe (eds.), 42. Warrell, R. P., Jr., Frankel, S. R., Miller, W. H., Jr., Scheinberg, Expression of Differentiated Functions in Cancer Cells, pp. 257-273. D. A., Itri, L. M., Hittelman, W. N., Vyas, R., Andreeff, M., Tafuri, New York: Raven Press, 1982. A., Jakubowski, A., Gabrilove, J., Gordon, M. S., and Dmitrovsky, E. 28. Fontana, J. A., Reppucci, A., Durham, J. P., and Miranda, D. Differentiation therapy of acute promyelocytic leukemia with treti- Correlation between the induction of leukemic cell differentiation by loin (all-trans-retinoic acid). N. Engl. J. Med., 324: 1385-1393, various retinoids and modulation of protein kinases. Cancer Res., 46: 1991. 2468-2473, 1986. 43. Chen, Z. X., Xue, Y. Q., Zhang, R., Tao, R. F., Xia, X. M., Li, C., 29. Tobler, A., Dawson, M. I., and Koeffler, H. P. Retinoids. Structure- Wang, W., Zu, W. Y., Yao, X. Z., and Ling, B. J. A clinical and function relationship in normal and leukemic hematopoiesis in vitro. J. experimental study on all-trans retinoic acid-treated acute promyelo- Clin. Invest., 78: 303-309, 1986. cytic leukemia patients. Blood, 78: 1413-1419, 1991. 30. Martin, S. J., Bradley, J. G., and Cotter, T. G. HL-60 cells induced 44. Muindi, J., Frankel, S. R., Miller, W. H., Jr., Jakubowski, A., to differentiate towards neutrophils subsequently die via apoptosis. Clin. Scheinberg, D. A., Young, C. W., Dmitrovsky, E., and Warrell, R. P., Jr. Exp. Immunol., 79: 448-453, 1990. Continuous treatment with all-trans retinoic acid causes a progressive 31. Berenbaum, M. C. What is synergy? Pharmacol. Rev., 41: 93-141, reduction in plasma drug concentrations: implications for relapse and 1989. retinoid ‘ ‘resistance’ ‘ in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia. 32. Formelli, F., Carsana, R., Costa, A., Buranelli, F., Campa, T., Blood, 79: 299-303, 1992. Dossena, G., Magni, A., and Pizzichetta, M. Plasma retinol level reduc- 45. Delva, L., Comic, M., Balitrand, N., Guidez, F., Miclea, J. M., tion by the synthetic retinoid fenretinide: a one year follow-up study of Delmer, A., Teillet, F., Fenaux, P., Castaigne, S., Degos, L., and breast cancer patients. Cancer Res., 49: 6149-6152, 1989. Chomienne, C. Resistance to all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) therapy in 33. Kaiser-Kupfer, M. I., Peck, 0. L., Caruso, R. C., Jaffe, M. J., relapsing acute promyelocytic leukemia: study of in vitro ATRA sen- DiGiovanna, J. J., and Gross, E. G. Abnormal retinal function associated sitivity and cellular retinoic acid binding protein levels in leukemic with fenretinide, a synthetic retinoid. Arch. Ophthalmol., 104: 69-70, cells. Blood, 82: 2175-2181, 1993. 1986. 46. Comic, M., Delva, L., Guidez, F., Balitrand, N., Degos, L., and 34. Gallagher, R. E., de Cuevillas, F., Chang, C. S., and Schwartz, E. L. Chomienne, C. Induction of retinoic acid-binding protein in normal and Variable regulation of sensitivity to retinoic acid-induced differentiation malignant human myeloid cells by retinoic acid in acute promyelocytic in wild-type and retinoic acid-resistant HL-60 cells. Cancer Commun., leukemia patients. Cancer Res., 52: 3329-3334, 1992. 1: 45-54, 1989. 47. Fiorella, P. D., and Napoli, J. L. Expression of cellular retinoic acid 35. Takahashi, N., and Breitman, T. R. The covalent labeling of pro- binding protein (CRABP) in Escherichia coli. Characterization and teins by 17 3-estradiol, retinoic acid, and progesterone in the human evidence that holo-CRABP is a substrate in retinoic acid metabolism. J. breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and MCF-7/AdrR. J. Steroid Biochem. Biol. Chem., 266: 16572-16579, 1991. Mol. Biol., 43: 489-497, 1992. 48. Napoli, J. L., Posch, K. P., Fiorella, P. D., and Boerman, 36. Takahashi, N., Liapi, C., Anderson, W. B., and Breitman, T. R. Retinoylation of the cAMP-binding regulatory subunits of type I and M. H. E. M. Physiological occurrence, biosynthesis and metabolism of type II cAMP-dependent protein kinases in HL6O cells. Arch. Biochem. retinoic acid: evidence for roles of cellular retinol-binding protein Biophys., 290: 293-302, 1991. (CRBP) and cellular retinoic acid-binding protein (CRABP) in the pathway of retinoic acid homeostasis. Biomed. Pharmacother., 45: 131- 37. Abou-Issa, H., and Duruibe, V. A. Anticarcinogenic effect of reti- 143, 1991. noids on 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene-induced mammary tumor in- duction, and its relationship to cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase. 49. Boylan, J. F., and Gudas, L. J. The level of CRABP-I expression Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 135: 116-123, 1986. influences the amounts and types of all-trans-retinoic acid metabolites 38. Muindi, J. R. F., Frankel, S. R., Huselton, C., DeGrazia, F., Gar- in F9 teratocarcinoma stem cells. J. Biol. Chem., 267: 21486-21491, land, W. A., Young, C. W., and Warrell, R. P., Jr. Clinical pharmacol- 1992. ogy of oral all-trans retinoic acid in patients with acute promyelocytic 50. Stoner, C. M., and Gudas, L. J. Mouse cellular retinoic acid binding leukemia. Cancer Res., 52: 2138-2142, 1992. protein: cloning, complementary DNA sequence, and messenger RNA 39. Napoli, J. L., Pramanik, B. C., Williams, J. B., Dawson, M. I., and expression during the retinoic acid-induced differentiation of F9 wild- Hobbs, P. D. Quantification of retinoic acid by gas-liquid chromatog- type and RA-3-10 mutant teratocarcinoma cells. Cancer Res., 49: raphy-mass spectrometry: total versus all-trans-retinoic acid in human 1497-1504, 1989. plasma. J. Lipid Res., 26: 387-392, 1985. 51. Boylan, J. F., and Gudas, L. J. Overexpression of the cellular 40. Eckhoff, C., and Nau, H. Identification and quantitation of all-trans- retinoic acid binding protein-I (CRABP-I) results in a reduction in and 13-cis-retinoic acid and 13-cis-4-oxoretinoic acid in human plasma. differentiation-specific gene expression in F9 teratocarcinoma cells. J. J. Lipid Res., 31: 1445-1454, 1990. Cell Biol., 112: 965-979, 1991. 41. Castaigne, S., Chomienne, C., Daniel, M. T., Ballerini, P., Berger, 52. Siegenthaler, G., Tomatis, I., Chatellard-Gruaz, D., Jaconi, S., R., Fenaux, P., and Degos, L. All-trans retinoic acid as a differentiation Eriksson, U., and Saurat, J. H. Expression of CRABP-I and -II in human therapy for acute promyelocytic leukemia. I. Clinical results. Blood, 76: epidermal cells. Alteration of relative protein amounts is linked to the 1704-1709, 1990. state of differentiation. Biochem. J., 287: 383-389, 1992.

Downloaded from clincancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 1995 American Association for Cancer Research. N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide (Fenretinide) in combination with retinoic acid enhances differentiation and retinoylation of proteins.

N Takahashi, E A Sausville and T R Breitman

Clin Cancer Res 1995;1:637-642.

Updated version Access the most recent version of this article at: http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/1/6/637

E-mail alerts Sign up to receive free email-alerts related to this article or journal.

Reprints and To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications Subscriptions Department at [email protected].

Permissions To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, use this link http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/1/6/637. Click on "Request Permissions" which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Rightslink site.

Downloaded from clincancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 1995 American Association for Cancer Research.