Viewed in Barbosa Et Al

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Viewed in Barbosa Et Al Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2018 Insects in Variable Plant Patches Andrew Charles Merwin Follow this and additional works at the DigiNole: FSU's Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES INSECTS IN VARIABLE PLANT PATCHES By ANDREW CHARLES MERWIN A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Biological Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2018 Andrew Merwin defended this dissertation on August 27, 2018. The members of the supervisory committee were: Nora Underwood Professor Co-Directing Dissertation Brian Inouye Professor Co-Directing Dissertation Nick Cogan University Representative Alice Winn Committee Member Scott Burgess Committee Member Joseph Travis Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii Dedicated to Anita Merwin and Art Fabian, whose curiosity for the natural world was contagious. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS A staggering number of kind and brilliant people have helped me with my dissertation. I owe them a mountain of gratitude. Foremost, I would like to thank my advisers, Nora Underwood and Brian Inouye, for being incomparably generous with their time and for teaching me how to think more critically and communicate more clearly. They and the other members of my committee—Scott Burgess, Nick Cogan, Joe Travis, and Alice Winn—have all been exceptionally supportive of me, my research, and my passion for teaching. In particular, I thank Alice Winn for the opportunity to teach as instructor of record and for her insightful comments on both my teaching and research. I also thank current and former members of the Underwood and Inouye labs—Amanda Buchanan, Josh Grinath, Tania Kim, David McNutt, Jessie Mutz, Jane Ogilvie, Brian Spiesman, and Molly Wiebush—for an engaging and welcoming environment, long bike rides, and contra dancing. I was awfully lucky to be around a large group of creative and interesting peer colleagues at FSU. Thank you, Zach Boudreau, Jason Cassara, Katherine Easterling, Kate Hill, Eve Humphrey, Christina Kwapich, Liz Lange, Chris Malinowski, Abigail Pastore, Cheston Peterson, and Natalie Ramirez-Bullon for being great colleagues and friends. Special thanks to Jo Imhoff and Will Ryan for your energy and creativity, especially with regard to the homemade music fest. Has there ever in history been a biology department with as much musical talent? Thanks to the Oncce-ler, Superb Itch, Galactadactyl (formerly known as Survival Knife), Megalops, Marine Snow, and Meredith Cenzer for making beautiful sounds. In addition, I am deeply indebted to the many talented undergraduate and non-traditional student colleagues who have assisted with all stages of my research and who have served as an indispensable source of motivation. They include Alex Basili, Eric Bender, Shelby Biscoe, Elizabeth Elba, Zofia Haack, Chris Hahn, Jacob Hart, Andrew Ibarra, Ryan Kilbride, Zach Lankist, Melanie Larson, Jessica Latimer, Andrew Olsson, Abigail Plyant, Aaron Yilmaz, and other members of the el-fan club. Special thanks to Theresa Jepsen for greenhouse space, plant care, and tremendous tolerance; Roy Weidner for help constructing insect cages large and small; Sandy Heath for help constructing flight mills; Joe Funderburk for using his resources to provide field space for beetle experiments; and Christy and Maxx Manchester being great and giving me space in California to not think about my dissertation. Finally, I owe the completion (and formatting) of this dissertation to Meredith Steck, who enriches my life, deepens my understanding of kindness and sincerity, and who has the best Dumbledore voice of anyone ever. This work was funded in part by Godfrey and Trott Scholarships through the Departmnet of Biological Science, a Dissertation Research Gant from the Graduate School, and a Planning Grant from Office of Research. Caw. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ............................................................................................................................. vi List of Figures ........................................................................................................................... vii Abstract ................................................................................................................................... viii 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 2. INCREASED CONSUMER DENSITY REDUCES THE STRENGTH OF NEIGHBORHOOD EFFECTS IN A MODEL SYSTEM ...................................................... 5 3. HOMIER HOSTPLANT PATCHES: NATAL HOSTPLANT EXPERIENCE INFLUENCES THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INSECT AND HOSTPLANT DENSITIES ........................................................................................................................ 26 4. THE INFLUENCE OF HABITAT PATCH AREA AND PERIMETER-TO-AREA RATIO ON THE MOVEMENT AND DENSITIES OF INSECTS: PREDICTIONS AND OBSERVATIONS .............................................................................................................. 46 5. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................... 66 References ................................................................................................................................ 69 Biographical Sketch .................................................................................................................. 80 v LIST OF TABLES 2.1 List of neighborhood effects and their definitions as used in this manuscript. ................... 19 2.2 ANOVA table for GLMMs of damage per gram for black-eyed peas and mung beans. ..... 20 3.1 GLMM results for offspring on and damage to collards among patches ............................ 42 3.2 GLMM results for offspring on and damage to plants within mixed patches.. ................... 43 4.1 GLMM estimates of fixed effects on beetle densities within patches................................. 61 4.2 Estimates of patch traits on recapture rates of C. sayi (n = 31). ......................................... 61 vi LIST OF FIGURES 2.1 A conceptual model for damage to a focal resource type as a function of consumer density... ........................................................................................................................... 21 2.2 Box (“landscape”) configuration ...................................................................................... 22 2.3 Estimates of GLMM parameters for per gram damage to black-eyed peas (above diagonal) and mung beans (below diagonal) in treatments of low, medium, and high beetle densities. .......................................................................................................................... 23 2.4 Per gram damage to focal resource (A) mung beans and (B) black-eyed peas as a function of neighbor and focal resource densities across three densities of bean beetles.................. 24 2.5 Damage to 1 g of black-eyed peas, the less-preferred resource, with and without 4 g of neighboring mung beans, the preferred resource (median ± IQR) ..................................... 25 3.1 Example arrangement of patches within a field-cage. Position of patch types was randomized within each cage for the experiments and cages had a height of 0.75 m (not shown) ............................................................................................................................. 44 3.2 Moth offspring per plant (caterpillars and pupae; Mean ± 1.96 SE) and estimated damage per plant (cm2 leaf tissue removed) on collards among patch types and between plant types within mixed patches. ....................................................................................................... 44 3.3 Results from small-cage experiments (mean ± 1.96 SE): (A) age at pupation (P < 0.001), (B) weight at pupation (P = 0.12). .................................................................................... 45 4.1 An example of a randomly generated landscape showing all 15 area x perimeter-to-area ratio combinations for patches. ......................................................................................... 62 4.2 Layout of soybean patches for large field experiment (35 x 95 m) ..................................... 62 4.3 Simulated patch density over time in patches that vary in their area and perimeter-to-area ratios ................................................................................................................................ 63 4.4 Densities of C. sayi in relation to patch area (A) and patch height (B) and densities of T. carolina in relation to patch area (C) and patch height (D) from our large field experiment ....................................................................................................................... 64 4.5 Untransformed recapture estimates of C. sayi (n = 31) from zero-inflated GLM. ............... 65 vii ABSTRACT Animals move through landscapes where their resources are unevenly and often patchily distributed. When animals move and choose among their scattered resources in predictable ways, ecologists may be able to anticipate the spatial distribution of their populations and the relative strength of their
Recommended publications
  • Abundance and Diversity of Ground-Dwelling Arthropods of Pest Management Importance in Commercial Bt and Non-Bt Cotton Fields
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology Entomology, Department of 2007 Abundance and diversity of ground-dwelling arthropods of pest management importance in commercial Bt and non-Bt cotton fields J. B. Torres Universidade Federal Rural de Pernarnbuco, [email protected] J. R. Ruberson University of Georgia Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub Part of the Entomology Commons Torres, J. B. and Ruberson, J. R., "Abundance and diversity of ground-dwelling arthropods of pest management importance in commercial Bt and non-Bt cotton fields" (2007). Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology. 762. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub/762 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Annals of Applied Biology ISSN 0003-4746 RESEARCH ARTICLE Abundance and diversity of ground-dwelling arthropods of pest management importance in commercial Bt and non-Bt cotton fields J.B. Torres1,2 & J.R. Ruberson2 1 Departmento de Agronomia – Entomologia, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Dois Irma˜ os, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil 2 Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, USA Keywords Abstract Carabidae; Cicindelinae; Falconia gracilis; genetically modified cotton; Labiduridae; The modified population dynamics of pests targeted by the Cry1Ac toxin in predatory heteropterans; Staphylinidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Additions to the Checklist of Wisconsin
    66 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 47, Nos. 1 - 2 Additions to the Checklist of Wisconsin Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae), Including the Adventive Harpalus rubripes (Duftschmid) Among Seven New State Records Peter W. Messer1 Abstract Sixteen species are added to the checklist of Wisconsin Geadephaga. Of these, seven species are reported here as new to Wisconsin. Nine taxa from the list are affected by new information resulting in the removal of six names. The Eurasian beetle Harpalus rubripes was discovered as early as 2009 on annu- ally surveyed beaches along Lake Michigan in southeastern Wisconsin. This discovery greatly extends the species distribution westward from its presence in northeastern North America where it was first recorded in 1981. ____________________ There appears no end to the current accelerated pace of published faunal records and regional checklists. The vast majority of such endeavors are based arbitrarily on political geographic units rather than on well-defined natural systems. The scientific and esthetic allure of the ground beetles has contrib- uted greatly to the surge in publications (e.g., Erwin 2007, 2011; Erwin and Pearson 2008) on Western Hemisphere Caraboidea, the catalogue of North American Geadephaga (Bousquet 2012), and the concerted effort among users of BugGuide.net to supplement the latter catalogue by archiving new records at http://bugguide.net/node/view/744417. Bousquet (2012) updated all 2678 valid North American Geadephaga species-group taxa along with consolidating everything known about their geographic-political distributions. The present contribution adheres to Bous- quet’s nomenclature, classification, and phylogenetic order of the tribes. The relevant hierarchal classification descends according to order Coleoptera: suborder Adephaga: superfamily Caraboidea = Geadephaga: families Trachy- pachidae, Rhysodidae, and Carabidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Cylindera Cursitans (Ant-Like Tiger Beetle) Resembles Swift Tiger Beetle—Marking Connected, Legs Not Metallic
    5/13/2015 Antlions & tiger beetles & woolly bears, oh my! Ted C. MacRae 30 April 2015 A local entomologist’s look at some of Missouri’s more interesting insects All photos by Ted C. MacRae unless noted otherwise Who Am I? Grew up in Kansas City (yes, I’m a city boy!) B.S. Agriculture 1979, University of Missouri M.S. Entomology 1981, University of Missouri 1982–1990: Missouri Department of Agriculture, St. Louis, MO 1990–1995: Novo Nordisk Entotech, Davis, CA 1995–present: Monsanto Company, Chesterfield, MO First photo by Christopher Brown 1 5/13/2015 Discovering Entomology: collected insects as hobby during childhood, then seriously starting in college Photos by unknown (L), Carol Zimmermann (R) 2 5/13/2015 I’m never happier than when I am studying insects… Photos (clockwise from upper left) by Chuck Bellamy, unknown, Rich Thoma, & self …or photographing them Photos by (clockwise from upper left) Kent Fothergill, Rich Thoma, Lisa Ruschke , unknown 3 5/13/2015 Missouri: where forest yields to prairie The Natural Divisions of Missouri Source: R. H. Thom & J. H. Wilson. 1980. The Natural Divisions of Missouri. Trans. MO Acad. Sci. 14:9–23. 4 5/13/2015 Insects in the Glaciated Plains Insects in the Loess Hills Snakeweed grasshopper, Hesperotettix viridis Prairie May beetle, Phyllophaga lanceolata Common milkweed beetle, Tetraopes tetrophthalmus 5 5/13/2015 Desmocerus palliatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) Associated with Sambucus canadensis (elderberry) Hypsithermal relicts Relicts from hypsithermal period that began 9,000 yrs ago
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the RESTRUCTURING of ARTHROPOD TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS in RESPONSE to PLANT INVASION by Adam B. Mitchell a Dissertation Submitt
    THE RESTRUCTURING OF ARTHROPOD TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS IN RESPONSE TO PLANT INVASION by Adam B. Mitchell 1 A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomology and Wildlife Ecology Winter 2019 © Adam B. Mitchell All Rights Reserved THE RESTRUCTURING OF ARTHROPOD TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS IN RESPONSE TO PLANT INVASION by Adam B. Mitchell Approved: ______________________________________________________ Jacob L. Bowman, Ph.D. Chair of the Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology Approved: ______________________________________________________ Mark W. Rieger, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources Approved: ______________________________________________________ Douglas J. Doren, Ph.D. Interim Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ______________________________________________________ Douglas W. Tallamy, Ph.D. Professor in charge of dissertation I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ______________________________________________________ Charles R. Bartlett, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ______________________________________________________ Jeffery J. Buler, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological and Molecular Analysis of Australian Earwigs (Dermaptera) Points to Unique Species and Regional Endemism in the Anisolabididae Family
    insects Article Morphological and Molecular Analysis of Australian Earwigs (Dermaptera) Points to Unique Species and Regional Endemism in the Anisolabididae Family Oliver P. Stuart 1 , Matthew Binns 1,2, Paul A. Umina 1,3, Joanne Holloway 4 , Dustin Severtson 5, Michael Nash 6,7 , Thomas Heddle 8 , Maarten van Helden 6,8 and Ary A. Hoffmann 1,* 1 School of BioSciences, Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia; [email protected] (O.P.S.); [email protected] (M.B.); [email protected] (P.A.U.) 2 Agriculture and Food Business Unit, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Black Mountain, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia 3 Cesar, 293 Royal Parade, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia 4 New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Wagga Wagga Agricultural Institute, Pine Gully Road, Charles Sturt University, New South Wales 2795, Australia; [email protected] 5 Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, South Perth, Western Australia 6151, Australia; [email protected] 6 School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, the University of Adelaide, Urrbrae, South Australia 5064, Australia; [email protected] (M.N.); [email protected] (M.v.H.) 7 School of Life Science, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia 8 South Australian Research and Development Institute, Entomology, Waite Road, Waite, Urrbrae, South Australia 5064, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 1 February 2019; Accepted: 7 March 2019; Published: 14 March 2019 Abstract: Dermaptera (earwigs) from the Anisolabididae family may be important for pest control but their taxonomy and status in Australia is poorly studied.
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Responses of Grassland Ground Beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Communities to Conservation Reserve Program Management Practices
    DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSES OF GRASSLAND GROUND BEETLE (COLEOPTERA: CARABIDAE) COMMUNITIES TO CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PRACTICES A Thesis by Evan Waite Bachelor of Science, University of Florida, 2017 Submitted to the Department of Biological Sciences and the faculty of the Graduate School of Wichita State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science July 2019 © Copyright 2019 by Evan Waite All Rights Reserved DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSES OF GRASSLAND GROUND BEETLE (COLEOPTERA: CARABIDAE) COMMUNITIES TO CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PRACTICES The following faculty members have examined the final copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Science with a major in Biological Sciences. __________________________________ Mary Jameson, Committee Chair __________________________________ Gregory Houseman, Committee Member __________________________________ Andrew Swindle, Committee Member iii “We should preserve every scrap of biodiversity as priceless while we learn to use it and come to understand what it means to humanity.”—E.O. Wilson iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research project would not have been possible without the contributions of numerous individuals who so kindly dedicated extensive amounts of time, expertise, and unwavering support throughout the entire process. I would first like to thank Dr. Mary Liz Jameson for being the best mentor that anyone could ever ask for; I would not be half the scientist or person I am today without your guidance. Thank you to Alex Morphew and Fraser Watson for being with me on this journey every step of the way; even while knee deep in CRP.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Carabidae) Assemblages
    INTERACTIONS AMONG ASSEMBLAGES OF GROUND BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: CARABIDAE) IN NATURAL AND AGROECOSYSTEMS By BRYAN WADE FRENCH Bachelor of Science The University of Oklahoma Norman, Oklahoma 1981 Master of Science Brock University St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada 1986 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May, 1998 INTERACTIONS AMONG ASSEMBLAGES OF GROUND BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: CARABIDAE) IN NATURAL AND AGROECOSYSTEMS Thesis Approved: Deofthe Graduate College ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank my research advisor, Norman Elliott, for his invaluable help, guidance, and advice throughout this project. My committee chairman, Richard Berberet, also provided many helpful comments on this project. Appreciation is also extended to my current and former committee members, Gerrit Cuperus, Stanley Fox, Raymond Eikenbary, and David Reed. Their comments greatly improved the quality of this work. Larry Hodges, Verl Brorsen, Steve and Emma Lewis, Calvin and Lester Oyster, Randy Wedel, and Jeff Robinett kindly allowed the use of their land for collecting ground beetles. Kane Jackson, Brian Jones, Tim Johnson, Jon Medders, Rick Mahar, and Perry Shelby assisted in establishing experimental sites. George Ball and Danny Shpelely identified the ground beetles to species. Kane Jackson and John Burd helped check the traps. Lisa Morgan, Kane Jackson, and Jon Medders counted most of the ground beetles. Mike Palmer helped with the multivariate data analysis and reviewed chapters three and four. Tom Popham provided advice on ANOVA tests. Appreciation is also extended to my family and friends for their support and encouragement. The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Stillwater, Oklahoma, provided support making this research project possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Response to Harvest Residue Retention: Implications for Sustainable Forest Bioenergy Production
    Article Ground Beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Response to Harvest Residue Retention: Implications for Sustainable Forest Bioenergy Production Steven M. Grodsky 1,2,*, Rebecca R. Hernandez 1,2 , Joshua W. Campbell 3, Kevin R. Hinson 4, Oliver Keller 5 , Sarah R. Fritts 6, Jessica A. Homyack 7 and Christopher E. Moorman 8 1 Wild Energy Initiative, John Muir Institute of the Environment, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Land, Air & Water Resources, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA 3 Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA; [email protected] 4 6709 Tree Hill Road, Matthews, NC 28104, USA; [email protected] 5 Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; okeller@ufl.edu 6 Department of Biology, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA; [email protected] 7 Timberlands Strategy and Technology, Weyerhaeuser Company, Centralia, WA 98531, USA; [email protected] 8 Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 28 November 2019; Accepted: 30 December 2019; Published: 31 December 2019 Abstract: Research Highlights: Our study adds to the scant literature on the effects of forest bioenergy on ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and contributes new insights into the responses of ground beetle species and functional groups to operational harvest residue retention. We discovered that count of Harpalus pensylvanicus (DeGeer)—a habitat generalist—increased owing to clear-cut harvests but decreased due to harvest residue reductions; these observations uniquely allowed us to separate effects of additive forest disturbances to demonstrate that, contrarily to predictions, a generalist species considered to be adapted to disturbance may be negatively affected by altered habitat elements associated with disturbances from renewable energy development.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin of the Giant Ground Beetle Aplothorax Burchelli on St Helena Island
    The origin of the giant ground beetle Aplothorax burchelli on St Helena Island TEIJI SOTA1*, MICHIO HORI2, CLARKE SCHOLTZ3, GAYANE KARAGYAN4, HONG-BIN LIANG5, HIROSHI IKEDA6 and YASUOKI TAKAMI7 1Department of Zoology, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan 2Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan 3Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, Republic of South Africa 4Scientific Center of Zoology and Hydroecology, National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Armenia, Yerevan 0014, Armenia 5Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China 6Faculty of Agriculture and Life Science, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki 036-8561, Japan 7Graduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, Nada, Kobe 657-8501, Japan *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] This is the accepted version of the article published in Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2020, 131, 50-60. 1 Abstract Highly isolated oceanic islands harbor endemic ground beetles that have lost the ability to fly. Here, we investigate the origin of the possibly extinct flightless giant ground beetle Aplothorax burchelli on St Helena Island in the South Atlantic. A. burchelli was considered to be a member of the subtribe Calosomina (=genus Calosoma) of the subfamily Carabinae (Coleoptera: Carabidae) closely related to the genus Ctenosta (=Calosoma subgenus Ctenosta), but this proposition was questioned due to its unique external and genital morphology. We conducted a phylogenetic analysis of mitogenome sequences using historical specimens of A. burchelli and samples of representative species of Carabinae. Our analysis of 13 protein coding gene sequences revealed that A.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant This Institute, Conducted at Mississ
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 097 207 SE 018 210 AUTHOR Maxwell, Fowden G., Ed.; Barris,P. A., Ed. TITLE Proceedings of the Summer Instituteon Biological Control of Plant Insects and Diseases. PUB DATE 74 VOTE 655p. AVAILABLE FROMTh'3 University Press of Mississippi,3825 Ridgewood Road, Jackson, MS 39211 ($12.50) !DRS PRICE MF-$1.05 HC-$31.80 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS *Agricultural Production; Agriculture;Biological Sciences; Biology; *Entomology; Insecticides;Natural Resources; *Pesticides; *Plant Pathology; *Plant Science IDENTIFIERS Pest Management ABSTRACT This institute, conducted at MississippiState University, was an outgrowth of theCouncil of Higher Education in the Agricultural Science's effortsto study the needs and opportunities for the advancement ofscientific knowledge in land grant institutions and recommendprograms for implementation. The prceedings serve as an informationsource to those interested in isplementing and/or further developingprograms concerning pest management. Focusing on the Southern regionof the United States, the publilation is divided into fiveparts as follows: Part I, Concepts of ?est Management, includes historicalperspectives, ecological principles, approaches to measuringpopulations and the life system concepts. Part II, Parasites and Predictorsof Arthropods, consists of statements on such topicsas the status of biological control procedures, identification and classification,means to increase natural enemies and selectiveuse of in.Acticides. Part III discusses biological control of weeds, includingaquatic weeds. Part IV, Host Plant Resistance for Control ofPlant Pathogens and Insects, includes statements on disease resistance, techniquesof breeding for resistance and biochemical bases ofresistance of plants. Part V, Insect Pathogens, comprises microbiologicaldiscussions including bacteria, viral, protozoan and fun3a1pathogens. (MLB) BEST COPYAVAILABLE CTti CD PROCEEDINGS OF THE SUMMER INSTITUTE L1J ON BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF PLANT INSECTS AND DISEASES 10 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Impact of Parathlon in Soybeans
    IMlMlStalM 0(^MHllMntOf A#lcultur« Ecological Impact Agicultural R^earch Service Of Parathlon Technical BulMin NufTitoer1Ô6& In Soybeans A4 ^'/'^ cO ■-0 Vegetative Fauna (Part I) Abstract Marston, N. L, and Hennessey, M. K. 1982. Ecological Impact of Parathion in Soybeans.—Vegetative Fauna. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin 1665.28 p. An application of ethyl parathion to flowering soybeans reduced populations of predatory arthropods by 66 percent 6 days posttreatment. Egg and lan/al parasites of the green cloverworm, Plathypena scabra (F.), the most abundant caterpillar species, also were reduced. The green cloven/vorm population decreased by 83 percent 6 days after the applica- tion. Populations of secondary pests and detritus feeders similarly were affected. Most species made a remarkable comeback and reached checkf ield levels or higher 4 weeks after treatment. The population of green cloven/vorms increased to a maximum level 2.3 times higher than in the check field during pod fill, apparently caused by decreased prédation and parasitism of eggs and early instars. Survival of the resurgent population was low, however, and few 6th instars were noted in either the treated or check fields. Percent defoliation and yield did not differ in the two fields. KEYWORDS: soybeans, arthropods, insecticides, biological control, ecology, parathion. Acknowledgments We want to express our thanks to D. A. Current, G. E. Boutz, and Barbara Campbell for their help in conducting the experiment and counting the insects. We also thank J. S. Williamson for the use of his fields. (See also abstract and acknowledgments for Soil Arthropod Fauna on page 8.) Although the research for this publication was completed ¡n the midseventies, the results are as appropriate today as when the tests were conducted.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology and Management of Twolined Spittlebug, Prosapia Bicincta
    BIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF TWOLINED SPITTLEBUG, PROSAPIA BICINCTA (SAY) (HEMPITERA: CERCOPIDAE) IN TURFGRASS by PUNYA NACHAPPA (Under the direction of John N. All) ABSTRACT Potential predation on twolined spittlebug, Prosapia bicincta (Say) eggs, nymphs and adults was investigated in the laboratory by entomophagous arthropods commonly found in turfgrass. Eggs were most vulnerable to attack from predators. Nymphs are protected in the spittlemass from predation, but are susceptible to attack when, mechanically removed from their spittlemass. P. bicincta adults were also killed by arthropod predators evaluated in the study. The functional response of the tiger beetle, Megacephala carolina carolina L. to varying prey densities of P. bicincta, and fourth instar fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) larvae in single- prey and two-prey systems was assessed in the laboratory. Like most insect predators, M. carolina carolina demonstrated a type II functional response in both situations. An alternate management strategy for P. bicincta, with low-risk selective insecticides against nymphs and adults was evaluated in the field. Number of general use insecticides were effective in controlling P. bicincta nymphs and adults. INDEX WORDS: Centipedegrass, Biological control, Functional response, Chemical control, Integrated pest management BIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF TWOLINED SPITTLEBUG, PROSAPIA BICINCTA (SAY) (HEMPITERA: CERCOPIDAE) IN TURFGRASS by PUNYA NACHAPPA B.S (Ag)., Gandhi Krishi Vignana Kendra, Bangalore, Karnataka, India 2002 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE ATHENS, GEORGIA 2004 © 2004 Punya Nachappa All Rights Reserved BIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF TWOLINED SPITTLEBUG, PROSAPIA BICINCTA (SAY) (HEMPITERA: CERCOPIDAE) IN TURFGRASS by PUNYA NACHAPPA Major Professor: John N.
    [Show full text]