Patrol Deployment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Patrol Deployment If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice Office of Communication and Research Uttlization Patrol Deployment ,. Analyzing the Current Patrol Plan • Addressing Single Issues ., Meeting Multiple Objectives • Making the Change About the National Institute of Justice Authority for administering the Institute and awarding grants, contracts, and cooperative agreements is vested in the NIJ Director. In establishing its research agenda, the The National Institute of Justice is a research branch of the Institute is guided by the priorities of the Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice. The Institute's mission is to and the needs of the criminal justice field. The Institute ac­ develop knowledge about crime, its causes and control. tively solicits the views of police, courts, and corrections Priority is given to policy-relevant research that can yield practitioners as well as the private sector to identify the approaches and information that State and local agencies most critical problems and to plan research that can help can use in preventing and reducing crime. The decisions solve them. Current priorities are: made by criminal justice practitioners and policymakers af­ • Alleviating jail and prison crowding fect millions of citizens, and crime affects almost all our public institutions and the private sector as well. Targeting • Assisting victims of crime resources, assuring their effective allocation, and developing • Enhancing involvement of community resources and the new means of cooperation between the public and private private sector in controlling crime sector are some of the emerging issues in law enforcement and criminal justice that research can help illuminate. • Reducing violent crime and apprehending the career criminal Carrying out the mandate assigned by Congress in the • Reducing delay and improving the effectiveness of the Justice Assistance Act of 1984, the National Institute of adjudication process Justice: • Providing better and more cost-effective methods for o Sponsors research and development to improve and managing the criminal justice system strengthen the criminal justice system and related civil aspects, with a balanced program of basic and applied • Assessing the impact of probation and parole on subse­ research. quent criminal behavior • Evaluates the effectiveness of justice improvement pro­ • Enhancing Federal, State, and local cooperation in crime grams and identifies programs that promise to be suc­ control. cessful if continued or repeated. • Tests and demonstrates new and improved approaches James K. Stewart to strengthen the justice system, and recommends ac­ tions that can be taken by Federal, State, and local Director governments and private organizations and individuals to achieve this goal. • Disseminates information from research, demonstra­ tions, evaluations, and special programs to Federal, State, and local governments, and serves as an inter­ national clearinghouse of justice information. • Trains criminal justice practitioners in research and evaluation findings, and assists practitioners and re­ searchers through fellowships and special seminars. U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice Office of Communication and Research Utilization Patrol Deployment by Margaret J. Levine and J. Thomas McEwen September 1985 Issues and Practices in Criminal Justice is a publication series of the National Institute of Justke. Designed for the criminal justice professional, each Issues and Practices report presents the program options and management issues in a topic area, based on a review of research and evaluation find­ ings, operational experience, and expert opinion in the subject. The intent is to provide criminal justice managers and administrators with the information to make informed choices in planning, implementing and improving programs and practice. Prepared for the National Institute of Justice, V.S. Department of Justice by Abt Associates Inc., under contract #l-LEAA-Oll-Sl. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the V.S. Department of Justice. The following individuals provided information and assistance in the conduct of this study: Advisory Panel William G. Gay William L. Koleszar University City Science Center Colorado Department of Washington, D.C. Public Safety Denver, Colorado George J. Sullivan Police Management Associates Carlsbad, California Program Monitor John Spevacek National Institute of Justice Washington, D.C. 9~803 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or pOlicies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this cCl~~ed material has been granted by Pub] j c Doma;n,ArT,T/Orr; ce of '-'ommJJnication; &::<esearch ITti]; zati on/US Dept, of ,Justice to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis­ sion of the CG~t owner. ------------------~,.------------------ Foreword ',. ,. The patrol function is of central importance to police enforcement officials in determining the number of administrators. Its contribution to the agency mission, patrol officers needed to satisfy department service its visibility in the public eye, and its budget share of delivery objectives and in distributing those personnel the agency's resources make it essential that decisions across shifts and geographic boundaries. This report, on patrol planning and deployment be grounded on from the Institute series Issues and Practices in accurate information and careful analysis. For depart­ Criminal-Justice, reviews the techniques available for ments facing fiscal constraints, such analysis is par­ evaluating a current patrol deployment strategy and ticularly crucial. projecting the probable results of various changes in that deployment. While it explains the various techni- ' Independent of its resource implications, patrol cal solutions to deployment problems, it has been writ­ deployment presents other inherent challenges. A wide ten for readers without technical training. Of particu­ range of related functions-crime analysis, calls-for­ lar interest are the practical examples of how police service, shift schedules, and communications, to name departments in different parts of the country respond­ but a few - must be taken into account in making any ed to changes in city policy or new demands for service change. Deployment decisions require executives and through revisions in their deployment strategies, planners to make complex judgments in prioritizing rather than increases in their personnel ceilings. goals and attempting to meet multiple objectives. Fur­ ther, realistic administrators live with the knowledge In an era of fiscal limits, productivity and efficiency that even the best deployment strategy can be rendered are among the most pressing issues that police obsolete by any number of events beyond their con­ managers must address. The Institute hopes that trol, such as annexation, zoning changes, or new city Patrol Deployment will assist them in meeting that ordinances. challenge. Over the past decade new methods, including com­ James K. Stewart puter technologies, have been developed to help law Director Foreword iii Acknowledgements It is not possible in this brief space to thank adequately Kenneth Chels.t of Wayne State University also provided everyone who supported and contributed to this research. valuable written critiques of the document. Law enforcement agencies across t.ie country responded In-house support from Abt Associates staff was un­ candidly and patiently to qur telephone surveys and bounded. Ralph Jones and Joan Peterson laid the ground­ follow-up calls. The four agencies that we studied on-site work for the study. Deborah Carro~ carefully monitored should be specially recognized for accommodating our the work's progress, and Judie Feins and Jan Chaiken demanding schedules and answering endless questions assisted with technical and substantive reviews. Typing about their operations; they are the Albuquerque, New and secretarial support were provided by Yvonne Clark Mexico, Police Department; Charlotte, North Carolina, and Donna English. Police Department; Reading, Pennsylvania, Police Department and Springfield, Missouri, Police During the course of the project, there were two monitors Department. at the National Institute of Justice. Jim Gardner helped direct the focus of the gtudy. His persistence and deter­ Special appreciation is also extended to Mr. William Gay mination kept the project going through its lengthy and of the University City Science Center, Mr. William often frustrating developmental phase. John Spevacek's Koleszar of the Colorado Department of Public Safety, enthusiasm and continued interest guided the project to and Mr. George Sullivan of Police Management a smooth and successful completion. Associates. As members of the project's Advisory Board, they used their conceptual understanding of resource allocation and their practical experience to guide the research and review the draft of this report. Mr. William Bieck of the Houston Police Department and Prof. Margaret J. Levine Acknowledgements v
Recommended publications
  • MCCA Report on the 2020 Protest and Civil Unrest
    Major Cities Chiefs Association Intelligence Commanders Group Line Length Represents the Number of Protests in Each City/County MCCA Report on the 2020 Protests and Civil Unrest October1 2020 REPORT ON THE 2020 PROTESTS AND CIVIL UNREST October 2020 The Major Cities Chiefs Association (MCCA) is a professional organization of police executives representing the largest cities in the United States and Canada. The MCCA provides a unique forum for urban chiefs, sheriffs and other law enforcement executives to share ideas, experiences and strategies. MCCA provides a collaborative forum for the advancement of public safety through innovation, research, policy development, government engagement, community outreach, and leadership development. MCCA membership is comprised of Chiefs and Sheriffs of the sixty-nine largest law enforcement agencies in the United States and nine largest in Canada. They serve 79.9 million people (65.7 US and 14.2 Canada) with a workforce of 251,082 (222,973 US and 28,110 Canada) officers and non-sworn personnel. The MCCA Intelligence Commanders Group (ICG) functions as a subset of the MCCA that focuses on law enforcement intelligence and national security matters. The ICG is comprised of intelligence commanders from each MCCA agency that represents their organization’s intelligence and/or national security mission. The group serves as a mechanism for advising the Chiefs and Sheriffs on security matters, exchanging intelligence between MCCA members, and developing programs for combatting crime and terrorism globally.
    [Show full text]
  • Air-To-Ground Battle for Italy
    Air-to-Ground Battle for Italy MICHAEL C. MCCARTHY Brigadier General, USAF, Retired Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama August 2004 Air University Library Cataloging Data McCarthy, Michael C. Air-to-ground battle for Italy / Michael C. McCarthy. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-58566-128-7 1. World War, 1939–1945 — Aerial operations, American. 2. World War, 1939– 1945 — Campaigns — Italy. 3. United States — Army Air Forces — Fighter Group, 57th. I. Title. 940.544973—dc22 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. Air University Press 131 West Shumacher Avenue Maxwell AFB AL 36112–6615 http://aupress.maxwell.af.mil ii Contents Chapter Page DISCLAIMER . ii FOREWORD . v ABOUT THE AUTHOR . vii PREFACE . ix INTRODUCTION . xi Notes . xiv 1 GREAT ADVENTURE BEGINS . 1 2 THREE MUSKETEERS TIMES TWO . 11 3 AIR-TO-GROUND BATTLE FOR ITALY . 45 4 OPERATION STRANGLE . 65 INDEX . 97 Photographs follow page 28 iii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Foreword The events in this story are based on the memory of the author, backed up by official personnel records. All survivors are now well into their eighties. Those involved in reconstructing the period, the emotional rollercoaster that was part of every day and each combat mission, ask for understanding and tolerance for fallible memories. Bruce Abercrombie, our dedicated photo guy, took most of the pictures.
    [Show full text]
  • This Index Lists the Army Units for Which Records Are Available at the Eisenhower Library
    DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER LIBRARY ABILENE, KANSAS U.S. ARMY: Unit Records, 1917-1950 Linear feet: 687 Approximate number of pages: 1,300,000 The U.S. Army Unit Records collection (formerly: U.S. Army, U.S. Forces, European Theater: Selected After Action Reports, 1941-45) primarily spans the period from 1917 to 1950, with the bulk of the material covering the World War II years (1942-45). The collection is comprised of organizational and operational records and miscellaneous historical material from the files of army units that served in World War II. The collection was originally in the custody of the World War II Records Division (now the Modern Military Records Branch), National Archives and Records Service. The material was withdrawn from their holdings in 1960 and sent to the Kansas City Federal Records Center for shipment to the Eisenhower Library. The records were received by the Library from the Kansas City Records Center on June 1, 1962. Most of the collection contained formerly classified material that was bulk-declassified on June 29, 1973, under declassification project number 735035. General restrictions on the use of records in the National Archives still apply. The collection consists primarily of material from infantry, airborne, cavalry, armor, artillery, engineer, and tank destroyer units; roughly half of the collection consists of material from infantry units, division through company levels. Although the collection contains material from over 2,000 units, with each unit forming a separate series, every army unit that served in World War II is not represented. Approximately seventy-five percent of the documents are from units in the European Theater of Operations, about twenty percent from the Pacific theater, and about five percent from units that served in the western hemisphere during World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Police Department Organization Chart
    Chicago Police Department Organization Chart As of Thursday, January 30, 2020 Superintendent of Police CHARLIE BECK Org Chart Key Superintendent Any box with yellow glow indicates a direct report to Supt Office of Operations Office of Constitutional Policing Office = Deputy Superintendent First Deputy Superintendent and Reform TONY RICCIO Deputy Superintendent Bureau = Chief BARBARA WEST Area/Group = Deputy Chief District or Division = Commander Office of Operations Office of Constitutional Policing Division = Civilian Director Commanding Officer and Reform Commanding Officer ExO District or Division = Captain Chief Chief Section = Lieutenant Office of Operations Unit/Sector = Sergeant Ex O Deputy Chief Officer Support Unit Beat = District Coordination Officer Deployment Operations Crisis Intervention Teams Strategic Initiatives Division Detached Services Street Deputies Center / CPIC Commander Deputy Chief Commander Deputy Chief Data Analytics Unit Deployment Analysis Unit Bureau of Detectives Bureau of Counter-terrorism and Special Operations Chief Chief Court Section Detective Criminal CT and Special Training & Support Headquarters AREA 1 AREA 2 AREA 3 AREA 4 AREA 5 Reform Management Networks Group AREA 2 AREA 3 AREA 4 AREA 5 Operations Group Group Deputy Chief Deputy Chief Deputy Chief Deputy Chief DeputyDeputy Chief Group Group Deputy Chief Deputy Chief Deputy Chief Deputy Chief Deputy Chief Deputy Chief Deputy Chief Deputy Chief Deputy Chief CPD/FBI Violent Crimes Force Review Division Task Force Commander Counter terrorism Special
    [Show full text]
  • The Korean War
    N ATIO N AL A RCHIVES R ECORDS R ELATI N G TO The Korean War R EFE R ENCE I NFO R MAT I ON P A P E R 1 0 3 COMPILED BY REBEccA L. COLLIER N ATIO N AL A rc HIVES A N D R E C O R DS A DMI N IST R ATIO N W ASHI N GTO N , D C 2 0 0 3 N AT I ONAL A R CH I VES R ECO R DS R ELAT I NG TO The Korean War COMPILED BY REBEccA L. COLLIER R EFE R ENCE I NFO R MAT I ON P A P E R 103 N ATIO N AL A rc HIVES A N D R E C O R DS A DMI N IST R ATIO N W ASHI N GTO N , D C 2 0 0 3 United States. National Archives and Records Administration. National Archives records relating to the Korean War / compiled by Rebecca L. Collier.—Washington, DC : National Archives and Records Administration, 2003. p. ; 23 cm.—(Reference information paper ; 103) 1. United States. National Archives and Records Administration.—Catalogs. 2. Korean War, 1950-1953 — United States —Archival resources. I. Collier, Rebecca L. II. Title. COVER: ’‘Men of the 19th Infantry Regiment work their way over the snowy mountains about 10 miles north of Seoul, Korea, attempting to locate the enemy lines and positions, 01/03/1951.” (111-SC-355544) REFERENCE INFORMATION PAPER 103: NATIONAL ARCHIVES RECORDS RELATING TO THE KOREAN WAR Contents Preface ......................................................................................xi Part I INTRODUCTION SCOPE OF THE PAPER ........................................................................................................................1 OVERVIEW OF THE ISSUES .................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • ICS Organizational Structure and Elements
    ICS Organizational Structure and Elements EXTRACTED FROM - E/L/G 0300 INTERMEDIATE INCIDENT COMMAND SYSTEM FOR EXPANDING INCIDENTS, ICS 300 March 2018 ICS Organizational Structure and Elements EXTRACTED FROM - E/L/G 0300 Intermediate Incident Command System for Expanding Incidents, ICS 300 ICS Organizational Structure and Elements • Command Staff: The staff who report directly to the Incident Commander, including the Public Information Officer, Safety Officer, Liaison Officer, and other positions as required. • Section: The organizational level having responsibility for a major functional area of incident management (e.g., Operations, Planning, Logistics, Finance/Administration, and Intelligence/Investigations (if established)). The Section is organizationally situated between the Branch and the Incident Command. • Branch: The organizational level having functional and/or geographical responsibility for major aspects of incident operations. A Branch is organizationally situated between the Section Chief and the Division or Group in the Operations Section, and between the Section and Units in the Logistics Section. Branches are identified by the use of Roman numerals or by functional area. • Division: The organizational level having responsibility for operations within a defined geographic area. The Division level is organizationally between the Strike Team and the Branch. • Group: An organizational subdivision established to divide the incident management structure into functional areas of operation. Groups are located between Branches (when activated) and resources (personnel, equipment, teams, supplies, and facilities) in the Operations Section. 2 March 2018 ICS Organizational Structure and Elements EXTRACTED FROM - E/L/G 0300 Intermediate Incident Command System for Expanding Incidents, ICS 300 • Unit: The organizational element with functional responsibility for a specific incident planning, logistics, or finance/administration activity.
    [Show full text]
  • ICS 300 – Lesson 2: Staffing Fundamentals
    ICS 300 – Lesson 2: Staffing Fundamentals Lesson Overview The Staffing Fundamentals lesson will provide a review of the ICS organization and descriptions of the responsibilities of the organizational elements within each section of the ICS. It will also review the general duties of each organizational element, terminology, staffing considerations, and reporting relationships. This lesson should take approximately 60 minutes to complete. Remember, you must complete the entire lesson to receive credit. Lesson 2 Learning Objectives By the end of this lesson, you should be able to: • Match responsibility statements to each ICS organizational element. • List the ICS positions which may include Deputies, and describe Deputy roles and responsibilities. Describe differences between Deputies and Assistants. • Describe ICS reporting and working relationships for Technical Specialists and Agency Representatives. • Describe reporting relationships and information flow within the organization. • Describe the Air Operations Branch and its relationship to other Functions. ICS Management Functions As you learned in ICS 200, the ICS organization is built around five major functions that may be applied on any incident whether it is large or small. The five major management functions are: • Incident Command • Operations Section • Planning Section • Logistics Section • Finance/Administration Section 1 ICS 300 – Lesson 2: Staffing Fundamentals ICS Organization A major advantage of the ICS organization is the ability to fill only those parts of the organization that are required. For some incidents, and in some applications, only a few of the organization’s functional elements may be required. However, if there is a need to expand the organization, additional positions exist within the ICS framework to meet virtually any need.
    [Show full text]
  • ICS 100 – Lesson 3: ICS Organization: Part II
    ICS 100 – Lesson 3: ICS Organization: Part II Lesson Overview The ICS Organization: Part II lesson introduces you to the: • Roles and responsibilities of the General Staff. • Expansion and contraction of the ICS organization. This lesson should take approximately 30 minutes to complete. Remember, you must complete the entire lesson to receive credit. General Staff Expansion of the incident may also require the delegation of authority for the performance of the other management functions. The people who perform the other four management functions are designated as the General Staff. The General Staff is made up of four sections: Operations, Planning, Logistics, and Finance/Administration. ICS Section Chiefs and Deputies As mentioned previously, the person in charge of each section is designated as a Chief. Section Chiefs have the ability to expand their section to meet the needs of the situation. Each of the Section Chiefs may have a Deputy, or more than one, if necessary. The Deputy: • May assume responsibility for a specific portion of the primary position, work as relief, or be assigned other tasks. • Should always be as proficient as the person for whom he or she works. In large incidents, especially where multiple disciplines or jurisdictions are involved, the use of Deputies from other organizations can greatly increase interagency coordination. Operations Section Until Operations is established as a separate Section, the Incident Commander has direct control of tactical resources. The Incident Commander will determine the need for a separate Operations Section at an incident or event. When the Incident Commander activates an Operations Section, he or she will assign an individual as the Operations Section Chief.
    [Show full text]
  • FM 6-0, Commander and Staff Organization and Operations, Provides Commanders and Their Staffs with Tactics and Procedures for Exercising Mission Command
    FM 6-0 COMMANDER AND STAFF ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS MAY 2014 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This publication supersedes ATTP 5-0.1, dated 14 September 2011 HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY This publication is available at Army Knowledge Online (https://armypubs.us.army.mil/doctrine/index.html). To receive publishing updates, please subscribe at http://www.apd.army.mil/AdminPubs/new_subscribe.asp. FM 6-0, C1 Change No. 1 Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC, 11 May 2015 Commander and Staff Organization and Operations 1. Change 1 to FM 6-0, 5 March 2014, adds the supersession statement to the cover. 2. Modifies figure 7-2. 3. Modifies figure 9-5. 4. Adds joint command relationships to appendix B. 5. Modifies table B-2. 6. Modifies table B-3. 7. Adds definitions of close support, direct liaison authorized, direct support, and mutual support. 8. A number sign (+) marks new material. 9. FM 6-0, 5 May 2014, is changed as follows: Remove Old Pages Insert New Pages front cover front cover pages i through vi pages i through vi pages 7-1 through 7-2 pages 7-1 through 7-2 pages 9-23 through 9-45 pages 9-23 through 9-46 pages B-1 through B-7 pages B-1 through B-7 pages Glossary-1 through Glossary-9 pages Glossary-1 through Glossary-9 pages Index-1 through Index-9 pages Index-1 through Index-9 7. File this transmittal sheet in front of the publication for reference purposes. DISTRUBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Manual (FM) 3-24/ Marine Corps Warfighting Publication (MCWP) 3-33.5 Provides Doctrine for Army and Marine Units That Are Countering an Insurgency
    FM 3-24 MCWP 3-33.5 INSURGENCIES AND COUNTERING INSURGENCIES MAY 2014 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FM 3-24/MCWP 3-33.5, C1 Change No. 1 Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC, 2 June 2014 Insurgencies and Countering Insurgencies 1. Change 1 to FM 3-24/MCWP 3-33.5, 13 May 2014, amends text as necessary. 2. A plus sign (+) marks new material. 3. FM 3-24/MCWP 3-33.5, 13 May 2014, is changed as follows: Remove Old Pages Insert New Pages pages 1-13 through 1-14 pages 1-13 through 1-14 pages 2-3 through 2-4 pages 2-3 through 2-4 pages 4-1 through 4-2 pages 4-1 through 4-2 pages 4-5 through 4-6 pages 4-5 through 4-6 pages 4-11 through 4-12 pages 4-11 through 4-12 pages 7-5 through 7-10 pages 7-5 through 7-10 4. File this transmittal sheet in front of the publication for reference purposes. DISTRUBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. FM 3-24/MCWP 3-33.5, C1 2 June 2014 By Order of the Secretary of the Army: RAYMOND T. ODIERNO General, United States Army Chief of Staff Official: GERALD B. O’KEEFE Administrative Assistant to the Secretary of the Army 1414902 BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMANDANT OF THE MARINE CORPS: DISTRIBUTION: Active Army, Army National Guard, and U.S. Army Reserve: To be distributed in accordance with the initial distribution number 121724, requirements for FM 3-24.
    [Show full text]
  • Jungle Skippers • Poole the 25 DREW PER PA S
    25 Jungle Skippers • Poole Skippers Jungle THE 25 DREW PER PA S Jungle Skippers e 317th Troop Carrier Group in the Southwest Pacic and eir Legacy John D. Poole Major, USAF Air University Press ISBN: 978-1-58566-270-8 ISSN: 1941-3785 Air University Steven L. Kwast, Lieutenant General, Commander and President School of Advanced Air and Space Studies Thomas D. McCarthy, Colonel, Commandant and Dean AIR UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ADVANCED AIR AND SPACE STUDIES Jungle Skippers The 317th Troop Carrier Group in the Southwest Pacific and Their Legacy John D. Poole Major, USAF Drew Paper No. 25 Air University Press Air Force Research Institute Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama Project Editor Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data James S. Howard Names: Poole, John D., 1976- author. | Air University (U.S.). Copy Editor Press, publisher. | Air University (U.S.). School of Advanced Air Carolyn J. Burns and Space Studies, issuing body. Title: Jungle Skippers: the 371th Troop Carrier Group in the Cover Art, Book Design, and Illustrations Southwest Pacific and their legacy / John D. Poole. Daniel Armstrong Other titles: 317th Troop Carrier Group in the Southwest Pacific and their legacy | Drew paper ; no. 25. 1941-3785 Composition and Prepress Production Description: First edition | Maxwell Air Force Base, Ala- Michele D. Harrell bama: Air University Press, Air Force Research Institute, 2016 | Series: Drew Paper, ISSN 1941-3785; no. 25 | Includes biblio- Print Preparation and Distribution graphical references. Diane Clark Identifiers: LCCN 2016044001 | ISBN 9781585662708 | ISBN 1585662704 Subjects: LCSH: United States. Army Air Forces. Troop Carrier Group, 317th—History. | World War, 1939-1945—Aerial operations, American.
    [Show full text]
  • Org Chart DP9 2020(93020)
    LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATION CHART MICHEL R. MOORE CHIEF OF POLICE As of DP 9, 2020 (August 30, 2020 - September 26, 2020) EXECUTIVE BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS INSPECTOR DIRECTOR GENERAL Richard Tefank Mark Smith COMMISSION POLICE PERMIT INVESTIGATION DIVISION Dale Maria Lou Eileen Decker Shane Murphy Steve REVIEW PANEL Lieutenant II Bonner Calanche* Commissioner Goldsmith Soboroff Ernest Caldera Commissioner Commissioner President Vice President Commissioner COMMUNITY GOVERNMENTAL SAFETY LIAISON SECTION DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF PARTNERSHIP CHIEF OF STAFF CHIEF OF POLICE CONSTITUTIONAL AUDIT DIVISION BUREAU Deputy Chief Michel R. Moore POLICING & POLICY Deputy Chief BOPC Dominic Choi Police Admin. III Police Admin. I Emada Tingirides LIAISON Lizabeth Rhodes Trina Unzicker Mayor’s Security EMPLOYEE RISK MANAGEMENT OCB/OVB OSB/OWB Detail PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS RELATIONS LEGAL AFFAIRS GROUP Captain II GROUP GROUP Captain III Public Info. Director II Commander Commander Giselle Espinoza Billy Brockway OMBUDS Daniel Randolph Josh Rubenstein Marc Reina SECTION MEDIA RELATIONS DIVISION RISK MANAGEMENT & LEGAL AFFAIRS COMMUNITY POLICIES DIVISION DIVISION RELATIONS Captain II SECTION STRATEGIC Captain II Captain III Stacy Spell Special Assistant PLANNING SECTION Jennifer Thomas Bryan Lium Fred Booker DIRECTOR, DIRECTOR, DIRECTOR, DETECTIVE OFFICE OF OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL SPECIAL OFFICE OF SPECIAL SUPPORT OPERATIONS STANDARDS OPERATIONS DIVISION OPERATIONS BUREAU BEHAVIORAL SERVICES Assistant Chief BUREAU Captain II Assistant Chief
    [Show full text]