DOCSLIB.ORG

U·M·I Ace;Essing the World's Information Since 1938

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
U·M·I Ace;Essing the World's Information Since 1938 Forager-farmer transitions in coastal prehistory Green, Paul Randolph ProQuest Dissertations and Theses; 1987; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global pg. n/a Tl\.TJ.IODllll .lmT,n,.. T ...._"\ --,-ERS .&J.'1.a: 'V.U,.lU...t:1.1..1.Vl" J.v UIS The most advanced technology has been used to photo­ graph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the original text directly from the copy submitted. Thus, some dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from a computer printer. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyrighted material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are re­ produced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and. continuing from J.eft to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page is available as one exposure on a standard 35 mm slide or as a 17" x 23" black and white photographic print for an additional charge. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. 35 mm slides or 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. ,U·M·I Ace;essing the World's Information since 1938 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ---------------·~ Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Order Number 8821469 Forager-farmer transitions in coastal prehistory Green, Paul Randolph, Ph.D. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1987 U· 1'1·1 300 N. Zeeb Rd. Ann Arbor, MI 48106 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. PLEASE NOTE: In all cases this material has been filmed in the best possible way from the available copy. Problems encountered with this document have been identified here with a check mark~· 1. Glossy photographs or pages __ 2. Colored illustrations, paper or print ___ 3. Photographs with dark background / 4. Illustrations are poor copy ___ 5. Pages with black marks, not original copy ___ 6. Print shows through as there is text on both sides of page ___ 7. Indistinct, broken or small print on several pages / 8. Print exceeds margin requirements __..L 9. Tightly bound copy with print lost in spine ___ 10, Computer printout pages with indistinct print ___ 11. Page(s) lacking when r.;ateiial received, and not available from school or author. 12. Page(s) seem to be missing in numbering only as text follcws. 13. Two pages numbered . Text follows. 14. Curling and wrinkled pages ___ 15. Dissertation contains pages with print at a slant, filmed c1.s received ____ 16. Other-----------------------------~ U·MI Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. FORAGER-FARMER TRANSITIONS IN COASTAL PREHISTORY by Paul R. Green A Dissertation submitted to the faculty of The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology Chapel Hill 1987 Reader Re. er ---- -------- Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. PAUL RANDOLPH GREEN. Forager-Farmer Transitions in Coastal Prehistory (Under the direction of Carole L. Crumley). A comparison of the process by which sedentary communities and full scale agriculture appear in two independent cultural settings, one in the Mediterranean basin and the other in Mid-Atlantic North America, shows it to be gradual and influenced by both local and exogenous factors. The nonagricultural Mesolithic cultures of the French Languedoc, their nominally agricultural successors: the Cardial Neolithic groups, and the nonagricultural Meckley culture of North America for a long time all resisted complete acculturation to a true farming lifestyle. Local social processes working within a bountiful estuarine ecosystem did eventually produce sedentary life, ceramics, and some social ranking. In both cases, however; full scale agriculture and the appearance of large village populations with clear class differentiation did not appear until much later in their respective historical sequences: the late Neolithic and Chalcolithic in France and the ultimate late Woodland in coastal Virginia. When this change finally came, it had much to do with external factors such as trade and population movements. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES .• iii LIST OF FIGURES •• vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS •. • • • xvi INTRODUCTION • • • • • • • • • • 1 The Comparative Archaeology of Coastal Societies. 2 Maritime Adaptations, Sedentary Life, and Agricultural Origins • . • • 10 CHAPTER I. HOLOCENE COASTAL ECOLOGY •. 27 Coastal Environments and Ecosystems •• 27 Changes in Climate, Sea Level, and Coastal Environments •.•••• 31 CHAPTER II. THE FORAGER-FARMER TRANSITION IN SOUTHERN FRANCE. • • • . • • • • • 55 The Environmental Setting. • • • . • • • • • 55 The Cultural Setting. • • • • • . • • • • • 57 The Evolution and Dispersal of Sedentary Life and Agriculture in Southern France. 64 CHAPTER III. THE FORAGER-FARMER TRANSITION IN MID-ATLANTIC NORTH AMERICA. 72 The Environmental Setting ..••.• 72 The Cultural Setting .•..••• 80 Archaeology of the Lower Chesapeake Bay: Excavations on Cape Henry ••• . • 107 -Swing Site {44VB16) • • • • • • 108 -Cedar Point Site (44VB40) •••• • 114 Excavations on Broad Bay -Great Neck Site (44VB7) •••••••• 116 Assemblage Comparisons in Southeastern Virginia and Northeastern North Carolina •••••••• 129 The Evolution and Dispersal of aedentary Life and Agriculture in Mid-Atlantic North America. 136 CH.A.PTER IV. CONCLUSIONS: THE ORIGINS AND EVOLUTION OF COASTAL SEDENTARY LIFE AND AGRICULTURE .• 141 REFERENCES CITED •.••••.•• •• 328 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. LIST OF TABLES 1. Legend for ceramic tables ••• ••••• 145 2. Radiocarbon dates from sites in coastal areas of Atlantic North America ••••••••• 146 3. Archaeological sites in the Mid-Atlantic and adjacent regions of North America discussed in the text or listed in tables ••••••••• 150 4. Ceramic distributions at the Swing Site, 44VB16 • 154 5. Summary of principal ceramic surface treatments at the Swing Site, 44VB16 .•••••• 158 6. Ceramic distributions at the Cedar Point Site, 44VB40 ••• . ••. 159 7. Summary distribution of principal ceramic types at the Cedar Point Site, 44VB40 ••••.• 160 8. Ceramic distributions at the Great Neck Site, 44VB7 •.•. • • • • . 161 9. Summary of principal ceramic types with surface treatments at the Great Neck Site, 44VB7. 163 10. Ceramics in features of Lot 3, Great Neck Site (44VB7), excavated by the Virginia Research Center for Archaeology •••••.••• 164 11. Ceramic distributions at various sites in Virginia Beach, Virginia .••••••• 165 12. Lithic assemblages from sites in Virginia Beach, Virginia. • • • 167 13. Ceramics at four sites in the coastal plain and piedmont of Virginia (after Buchanan 1966, 1976; Maccord and Livesay 1982) • • • • . • 168 14. Ceramics at four sites in the Virginia coastal plain (see Maccord 1967; Gregory and Jerrell n.d.; Mccary 1958; Buchanan 1983; Maccord 1982) ••••••••••••••• 169 15. Ceramics at three sites in Virginia and Maryland (after Stephenson 1963, Winfree 1967, Evans 1955, and Mccary 1967) •••••••• 170 iii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 16. Ceramic distributions in Portsmouth, Virginia sites collected by Gardner et al. (1981a, 198lb, 1982) ••••••••-. -•••••••••• 171 17. Ceramic distributions at selected sites in the Virginia coastal plain (Evans 1955) •••• 172 18. Ceramic distributions at sites in the Virginia coastal plain (after Geier 1983, Opperman 1980, Reinhart 1978, Malpass 1976, and Mccary 1976) ••••••••••••••••• 173 19. Ceramic distributions at sites in the Northern Neck of Virginia (after Potter 1982 and Waselkov 1982) •••••• 174 20. Ceramic distributions from sites in Northumberland, Lancaster, and Richmond counties, Virginia (Potter 1982) ••••••••• 175 21. Features from the Hand Site (44SN22), Southampton County, Virginia (Smith 1971) containing Colington simple stamped or Mockley net impressed pottery. • • • • • 176 22. Ceramics at four sites in the piedmont and coastal plain of Virginia (after Egloff 1981, Sasser 1972, Anderson 1974, Holland 1985, Bott 1979, and Outlaw 1980) • • • • • • • . 177 23. Ceramic distributions at five sites in the Virginia coastal plain (after Clark 1977, Wittkofski 1980, Bott 1980, and Gardner et al. 1982). • • • • • • • • 178 24. Ceramic distributions at sites in southeastern Virginia, based on collections in the Virginia Research Center for Archaeology ••••••.•• 179 25. Ceramic distributions at sites on Colington Island, Dare County, North Carolina (after Phelps 1981). • •••• 183 26. Ceramic distributions at various
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mckenzie River Sub-Basin Action Plan 2016-2026
    McKenzie River Sub-basin Strategic Action Plan for Aquatic and Riparian Conservation and Restoration, 2016-2026 MCKENZIE WATERSHED COUNCIL AND PARTNERS June 2016 Photos by Freshwaters Illustrated MCKENZIE RIVER SUB-BASIN STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN June 2016 MCKENZIE RIVER SUB-BASIN STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN June 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The McKenzie Watershed Council thanks the many individuals and organizations who helped prepare this action plan. Partner organizations that contributed include U.S. Forest Service, Eugene Water & Electric Board, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, McKenzie River Trust, Upper Willamette Soil & Water Conservation District, Lane Council of Governments and Weyerhaeuser Company. Plan Development Team Johan Hogervorst, Willamette National Forest, U.S. Forest Service Kate Meyer, McKenzie River Ranger District, U.S. Forest Service Karl Morgenstern, Eugene Water & Electric Board Larry Six, McKenzie Watershed Council Nancy Toth, Eugene Water & Electric Board Jared Weybright, McKenzie Watershed Council Technical Advisory Group Brett Blundon, Bureau of Land Management – Eugene District Dave Downing, Upper Willamette Soil & Water Conservation District Bonnie Hammons, McKenzie River Ranger District, U.S. Forest Service Chad Helms, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jodi Lemmer, McKenzie River Trust Joe Moll, McKenzie River Trust Maryanne Reiter, Weyerhaeuser Company Kelly Reis, Springfield Office, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife David Richey, Lane Council of Governments Kirk Shimeall, Cascade Pacific Resource Conservation and Development Andy Talabere, Eugene Water & Electric Board Greg Taylor, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jeff Ziller, Springfield Office, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife MCKENZIE RIVER SUB-BASIN STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN June 2016 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Mckenzie River Watershed
    McKenzie River Watershed Baseline Monitoring Report 2000 to 2009 Karl A. Morgenstern David Donahue Nancy Toth Eugene Water & Electric Board January 2011 ii Acknowledgements The Eugene Water & Electric Board would like to acknowledge the various agencies and organizations that assisted with water quality sampling, providing guidance and input and assisting with the development of this document. McKenzie Watershed Council Water Quality Committee Members McKenzie Watershed Council Larry Six Mohawk Watershed Partnership Jared Weybright Weyerhaueser Company Maryanne Reiter Weyerhaueser Company Bob Danehy International Paper Company Loren Leighton U.S. Forest Service Dave Kreitzing U.S. Forest Service Bonnie Hammond U.S. Bureau of Land Management Steve Liebhardt U.S. Bureau of Land Management Janet Robbins City of Springfield Chuck Gottfried City of Springfield Todd Miller Springfield Utility Board Amy Chinitz Springfield Utility Board Dave Embleton Retired from Springfield Utility Board Chuck Davis Oregon Dept. of Environmental Quality Chris Bayham Springfield School District Stuart Perlmeter Army Corps of Engineers Greg Taylor Eugene Water & Electric Board Karl Morgenstern Eugene Water & Electric Board David Donahue Eugene Water & Electric Board Nancy Toth Partners Providing Sampling Support, Database Support and Document Review U.S. Forest Service Mike Cobb U.S. Forest Service David Bickford City of Springfield Shawn Krueger Eugene Water & Electric Board Jared Rubin Eugene Water & Electric Board Bob DenOuden Eugene Water & Electric Board
    [Show full text]
  • Ligures En España (II). Las Hipótesis De Los Filólogos
    [Otra edición en: Rivista di Studi Liguri 16.1-3, genaio-settembre1950, 37-56. Versión digital por cortesía de los herederos del autor, como parte de su Obra Completa, corregido de nuevo y con la paginación original]. © Martín Almagro Basch © De la versión digital, Gabinete de Antigüedades de la Real Academia de la Historia Ligures en España, II. Las hipótesis de los filólogos Martín Almagro Basch [-37→] Los anteriores textos escritos reunidos por nosotros ya habían sido utili- zados por varios historiadores a partir del siglo XVI. Pero en el siglo XIX comienza el trabajo de los filólogos y a base de analizar los posibles vestigios lingüísticos, se vuelven a barajar los citados escritos de la Antigüedad para construir hipótesis atrevidas, sobre la importancia y extensión de los pueblos antiguos citados por los geógrafos e historiadores clásicos, siendo uno de los más favorecidos por estas investigaciones el pueblo ligur. Resumiremos brevemente la serie de hipótesis eruditas en las cuales los textos y la filología han entrado en acción para llegar al conocimiento de este pueblo, no siempre con fortuna, pero siempre con una rica aportación de datos y sugestiones personales. Ya en los comienzos del siglo pasado Hervás y Panduro (1) y algo más tarde el Padre Risco (2) defendieron un origen ligur para varios pueblos pre- romanos hispánicos, utilizando argumentos sobre los cuales hoy no hemos de pensar. Su punto de vista no fue ya abandonado y aunque otras tesis más en moda durante algunos años hayan ido apartando la validez del ligurismo, éste siempre ha sobrevivido a causa de la permanencia de los textos escritos ante- riormente recogidos.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Watersheds in Greater Williamsburg
    Development and Watersheds in Greater Williamsburg: A Guide For Citizens and Students Environmental Science and Policy Research Group, The College of William and Mary Maureen Feldbaum Melanie Marzolf Prof. Timmons Roberts Fall, 2002 DEVELOPMENT AND WATER IN WILLIAMSBURG 1 1. Introduction: bay--has seen a long history of shifting land use and pressures on its ecological viability. Aside Contents The ecological and social systems of the Virginia from its old age, however, the lake is similar in Peninsula are changing rapidly: commercial, many respects to the thousands of impoundments 1. Introduction industrial and tourist development is combining that are found on the coastal plain and with extensive housing subdivisions to alter the throughout Virginia. 2. What’s at Stake?: What Happens land where we live, study and work. Decisions made each day in cities, counties, developers’ The surrounding College Creek watershed has to Our Land, Water and Biological offices, and even one’s own home, yard or experienced a long and well-documented history Communities with Development? driveway are shaping the future of the land and of land use since colonial times, so that the the health of the Chesapeake Bay rivers that current status of the watershed and lake as surround the Peninsula. The quality of the water measured by environmental monitoring can be 3. How is the Greater Williamsburg placed in archeological and historical contexts. Area Changing? in the Chesapeake Bay is dependent on the water flowing into it, which is in turn dependent on the Current land use in the College Creek watershed behaviors of the 15 million people who live in includes land developed for the College of 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Mckenzie River Subbasin Assessment Summary Table of Contents
    McKenzie River, ca. 1944 McKenzie River Subbasin Assessment Summary Report February 2000 McKenzie River, ca. 2000 McKenzie River, ca. 2000 Prepared for the McKenzie Watershed Council Prepared By: Alsea Geospatial, Inc. Hardin-Davis, Inc. Pacific Wildlife Research, Inc. WaterWork Consulting McKenzie River Subbasin Assessment Summary Table of Contents High Priority Action Items for Conservation, Restoration, and Monitoring 1 The McKenzie River Watershed: Introduction 8 I. Watershed Overview 9 II. Aquatic Ecosystem Issues & Findings 17 Recommendations 29 III. Fish Populations Issues & Findings 31 Recommendations 37 IV. Wildlife Species and Habitats of Concern Issues & Findings 38 Recommendations 47 V. Putting the Assessment to work 50 Juvenile Chinook Habitat Modeling 51 Juvenile Chinook Salmon Habitat Results 54 VI. References 59 VII. Glossary of Terms 61 The McKenzie River Subbasin Assessment was funded by grants from the Bonneville Power Administration and the U.S. Forest Service. High Priority Action Items for Conservation, Restoration, and Monitoring Our analysis indicates that aquatic and wildlife habitat in the McKenzie River subbasin is relatively good yet habitat quality falls short of historical conditions. High quality habitat currently exists at many locations along the McKenzie River. This assessment concluded, however, that the river’s current condition, combined with existing management and regulations, does not ensure conservation or restoration of high quality habitat in the long term. Significant short-term improvements in aquatic and wildlife habitat are not likely to happen through regulatory action. Current regulations rarely address remedies for past actions. Furthermore, regulations and the necessary enforcement can fall short of attaining conservation goals. Regulations are most effective in ensuring that habitat quality trends improve over the long period.
    [Show full text]
  • Mohawk/Mcgowan Watershed Analysis
    MOHAWK/McGOWAN WATERSHED ANALYSIS BLM MAY 1995 Chapter 1 Introduction What Is Watershed Analysis Watershed analysis is a systematic procedure for characterizing watershed and ecological processes to meet specific management and social objectives. Throughout the analytical process the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is trying to gain an understanding about how the physical, biological, and social processes are intertwined. The objective is to identify where linkages and processes (functions) are in jeopardy and where processes are complex. The physical processes at work in a watershed establish limitations upon the biological relationships. The biological adaptations of living organisms balance in natural systems; however, social processes have tilted the balance toward resource extraction. The BLM attempt in the Mohawk/McGowan analysis is to collect baseline resource information and understand where physical, biological and social processes are or will be in conflict. What Watershed Analysis Is NOT Watershed analysis is not an inventory process, and it is not a detailed study of everything in the watershed. Watershed analysis is built around the most important issues. Data gaps will be identified and subsequent iterations of watershed analysis will attempt to fill in the important pieces. Watershed analysis is not intended to be detailed, site-specific project planning. Watershed analysis provides the framework in the context of the larger landscape and looks at the "big picture." It identifies and prioritizes potential project opportunities. Watershed analysis is not done under the direction and limitations of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). When specific projects are proposed, more detailed project level planning will be done. An Environmental Assessment will be completed at that time.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Water in the Eugene-Springfield Area, Southern Willamette Valley, Oregon
    Ground Water in the Eugene-Springfield Area, Southern Willamette Valley, Oregon GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 2018 Prepared in cooperation with the Oregon State Engineer Ground Water in the Eugene-Springfield Area, Southern Willamette Valley, Oregon By F. J. FRANK GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 2018 Prepared in cooperation with the Oregon State Engineer UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1973 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 72-600346 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 Price: Paper cover $2.75, domestic postpaid; $2.50, GPO Bookstore Stock Number 2401-00277 CONTENTS Page Abstract ______________________ ____________ 1 Introduction _________ ____ __ ____ 2 Geohydrologic system ___________ __ _ 4 Topography _____________ ___ ____ 5 Streams and reservoirs ______ ___ _ __ _ _ 5 Ground-water system ______ _ _____ 6 Consolidated rocks __ _ _ - - _ _ 10 Unconsolidated deposits ___ _ _ 10 Older alluvium ____ _ 10 Younger alluvium __ 11 Hydrology __________________ __ __ __ 11 Climate _______________ _ 12 Precipitation ___________ __ 12 Temperature -__________ 12 Evaporation _______ 13 Surface water __________ ___ 14 Streamflow _ ____ _ _ 14 Major streams __ 14 Other streams ________ _ _ 17 Utilization of surface water _ 18 Ground water __________ _ __ ___ 18 Upland and valley-fringe areas 19 West side _________ __ 19 East side __________ ________________________ 21 South end ______________________________ 22 Central lowland ________ __ 24 Occurrence and movement of ground water 24 Relationship of streams to alluvial aquifers __ _ 25 Transmissivity and storage coefficient ___ _ 29 Ground-water storage _ __ 30 Storage capacity _ .
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Review of “The Mesolithic” in Relation to Siberian Archaeology ALEXANDER B
    ARCTIC VOL. 38, NO. 3 (SEPTEMBER 1985) P. 178-187 A Critical Review of “the Mesolithic” in Relation to Siberian Archaeology ALEXANDER B. DOLITSKY’ ABSTRACT. This paperexplores the potentialof the economic-ecqlogical method basedon the exploitation of fishresources for Mesolithic site iden- tification, as compared to the recently popular yet indecisive technological-typologicalmethod, to predict the existence of “Mesolithic-like” sub- sistence activities in Siberia during the Sartan-Holocene“transition” period. The article is an attempt toestablish, or at least topropose, new criteria that can lead toa higher level of understandingof Mesolithic economies insubarctic and arctic regions. Also, decision-making processes that operate to achieve behavioralgoals based on efficiency of human beingsare suggested. The model, designed with respectto geographical regions identified as interbiotic zones, has the advantage of offering specific alternative hypotheses enabling the definition of both environmental properties and predicted human behavior. Key words: Mesolithic, Siberia, interbiotic zone RÉSUMÉ. L’article &die le potentiel de la méthode économique-écologique fondte sur l’exploitation de poissons en guise de ressources pour l’identification desites mtsolithiques, en comparison avecla mdthode technologique-typologique populaire maisindécise, afin de prddire l’existence d’activitds de subsistencede genre mésolithique en Sibdrie durant la périodede transition Sartan-Holoctne. On tente d’établir ou au moins de pro- poser de nouveaux crittres qui pourraient permettre une meilleure comprdhension des économies mdsolithiques dans les rdgions arctiques et sub- arctiques. De plus, on suggkre des processus de prise de ddcisions qui visent21 établir des buts de comportement fondéssur l’efficacité de I’être hu- main.Conçu par rapport 21 des rdgionsgéographiques nommées zones interbiotiques, le modele a l’avantage d’offrir des choix particuliers d’hypothtses permettant la ddfinition des propridtés environnementales et du comportement humain prévu.
    [Show full text]
  • Riparo Arma Di Nasino Series
    University of Rome Carbon-14 Dates VI Item Type Article; text Authors Alessio, M.; Bella, F.; Cortesi, C.; Graziadei, B. Citation Alessio, M., Bella, F., Cortesi, C., & Graziadei, B. (1968). University of Rome carbon-14 dates VI. Radiocarbon, 10(2), 350-364. DOI 10.1017/S003382220001095X Publisher American Journal of Science Journal Radiocarbon Rights Copyright © The American Journal of Science Download date 06/10/2021 12:06:07 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final published version Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/651722 [RADIOCARBON, VOL. 10, No. 2, 1968, P. 350-364] UNIVERSITY OF ROME CARBON-14 DATES VI M. ALESSIO, F. BELLA Istituto di Fisica, University di Roma Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma C. CORTESI and B. GRAZIADEI Istituto di Geochimica, University di Roma The list includes age measurements carried out from December 1966 and November 1967. All samples both of archaeologic and geologic in- terest are drawn from Italian territory. Chemical techniques have remained unchanged (Bella and Cortesi, 1960). Two counters have been used for dating: the 1st, of 1.5 L, already described (Bella and Cortesi, 1960; Alessio, Bella, and Cortesi, 1964), the 2nd, of 1 L, recently assembled, is identical to the previous 1 L counter (Alessio, Bella, and Cortesi, 1964), its anticoincidence system was realized by a plastic scintillator and photomultipliers. Background 6.15 + 0.08 counts/min, counting rate for modern carbon 24.49 + 0.15 counts/min. Higher efficiency of electronic recording was obtained by reducing pulse length and by a few other changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunters and Farmers in the North – the Transformation of Pottery Traditions
    Hunters and farmers in the North – the transformation of pottery traditions and distribution patterns of key artefacts during the Mesolithic and Neolithic transition in southern Scandinavia Lasse Sørensen Abstract There are two distinct ceramic traditions in the Mesolithic (pointed based vessels) and Neolithic (flat based vessels) of southern Scandinavia. Comparisons between the two ceramic traditions document differences in manufacturing techniques, cooking traditions and usage in rituals. The pointed based vessels belong to a hunter-gatherer pottery tradition, which arrived in the Ertebølle culture around 4800 calBC and disappears around 4000 calBC. The flat based vessels are known as Funnel Beakers and belong to the Tragtbæger (TRB) culture, appearing around 4000 calBC together with a new material culture, depositional practices and agrarian subsistence. Pioneering farmers brought these new trends through a leap- frog migration associated with the Michelsberg culture in Central Europe. These arriving farmers interacted with the indigenous population in southern Scandinavia, resulting in a swift transition. Regional boundaries observed in material culture disappeared at the end of the Ertebølle, followed by uniformity during the earliest stages of the Early Neolithic. The same boundaries reappeared again during the later stages of the Early Neolithic, thus supporting the indigenous population’s important role in the neolithisation process. Zusammenfassung Keywords: Southern Scandinavia, Neolithisation, Late Ertebølle Culture, Early
    [Show full text]
  • Colonial Parkway a Triple Memorial of History Is Here Made Accessible by a Scenic and Historically Rich Parkway
    COLONIAL PAR KWAY IAMSB uko. 't14,4 Jamestown 0 94%cb 44, c°' 1L viRGirrit, Williamsburg Colonial National Historical Park VIRGINIA Colonial Parkway A triple memorial of history is here made accessible by a scenic and historically rich parkway N THE Virginia Peninsula three fa- Williamsburg Information Center. These mous places—Jamestown, Williams- are the best points of departure for seeing 0 burg, and Yorktown—form a triangle the areas. only 14 miles at the base. Here, between The parkway route is outward from James- the James and York Rivers, is compressed a town Island over a sandbar to Glasshouse great deal of American history. The found- Point An isthmus existed there in colonial ing of the first permanent English settlement times. For the colonists, it was the way to in 1607 at Jamestown, Va.; the establish- unoccupied lands awaiting beyond. In the ment there of the first representative form vicinity of the Glasshouse and Virginia's Fes- of government in the New World; the flower- tival Park, Colonial Parkway bends sharply ing of colonial culture and growth of revolu- to cross Powhatan Creek and then courses tionary sentiment at Williamsburg; and the eastward along Back River and the Thor- winning of American independence at York- oughfare, which separate Jamestown Island town are historical milestones. from the mainland. After following the Each place has a thrilling story of its own. James River for 3 miles, the parkway at Yet, they are connected stories, for things College Creek turns inland through the woods that happened at Jamestown led directly to toward Williamsburg.
    [Show full text]
  • The Naturalist
    THE NATURALIST The monthly newsletter of the Historic Rivers Chapter Virginia Master Naturalist Program http://historicrivers.org A MONTHLY NEWSLETTERVRIL 2 LUME 3 NO Volume 7 No. 10 November 2013 Chapter Board of Directors Two Exciting Photos from Annual Picnic 2013-2014 2013 More to come in next newsletter Officers Patty Maloney, President Kathi Mestayer, Vice President Ruth Gordon and Jan Lockwood Co-Secretaries Cheryl Jacobson, Treasurer Hart Haynes, Tom Dougherty, Janet Curtis, Joanne Sheffield Members-at-Large Mary Apperson, Chapter Advisor Committee Chairs Mr. Raccoon (or Adrienne Frank, Gary Driscole, Historians Mrs.) eating persim- Shirley Devan, Publicity & Outreach mons. Roger Gosden, Basic Training Frozen spider web Susan Powell, Membership seen on the early Lois Ullman, Volunteer Service Projects morning bird walk. Lucy Manning, Advanced Training Photos by Shirley Devan Kathi Mestayer, Programs Deb Woodward, Newsletter No parts of this newsletter may be reproduced without permission of the Board of Directors of Sherry Brubaker, Host the Historic Rivers Chapter. Contact: [email protected]. Dean Shostak, Field Trip Coordinator Virginia Master Naturalist programs are open to all, regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, genetic information, marital, family, or All meetings of the Board of Directors are open to mem- veteran status, or any other basis protected by law. An equal opportunity/affirmative action em- bers. ployer. Page 1 November 2013 Basic Training Program (Cohort VIII) Following an Informational Meeting at the Williamsburg Library in August, the class was launched on September 3 with a wonderful talk by Bill Williams on nomenclature. Cohort VIII is an enthusiastic group of 21 students who have enrolled with a wide range of background interests and ages, as in previous years.
    [Show full text]