© 2009 by Richard Vanderhoek. All Rights Reserved

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

© 2009 by Richard Vanderhoek. All Rights Reserved © 2009 by Richard VanderHoek. All rights reserved. THE ROLE OF ECOLOGICAL BARRIERS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF CULTURAL BOUNDARIES DURING THE LATER HOLOCENE OF THE CENTRAL ALASKA PENINSULA BY RICHARD VANDERHOEK DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2009 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor R. Barry Lewis, Chair Professor Stanley H. Ambrose Professor Thomas E. Emerson Professor William B. Workman, University of Alaska ABSTRACT This study assesses the capability of very large volcanic eruptions to effect widespread ecological and cultural change. It focuses on the proximal and distal effects of the Aniakchak volcanic eruption that took place approximately 3400 rcy BP on the central Alaskan Peninsula. The research is based on archaeological and ecological data from the Alaska Peninsula, as well as literature reviews dealing with the ecological and cultural effects of very large volcanic eruptions, volcanic soils and revegetation of volcanic landscapes, and northern vegetation and wildlife. Analysis of the Aniakchak pollen and soil data show that the pyroclastic flow from the 3400 rcy BP eruption caused a 2500 km² zone of very low productivity on the Alaska Peninsula. This "Dead Zone" on the central Alaska Peninsula lasted for over 1000 years. Drawing on these data and the results of archaeological excavations and surveys throughout the Alaska Peninsula, this dissertation examines the thesis that the Aniakchak 3400 rcy BP eruption created a massive ecological barrier to human interaction and was a major factor in the separate development of modern Eskimo and Aleut populations and their distinctive cultural traditions. Distal volcanic effects include ash fall, sulfuric acid rain, and sulfur dioxide injected into the atmosphere. The ash fall and sulfuric acid rain from the Aniakchak eruption heavily impacted western Alaska to the northwest of the volcano. The ash fall and acid rain had pronounced negative effects on low-growing biota (especially lichen), small mammals and birds, ungulates, and probably land-locked fish. The eruptive effects were catastrophic for western Alaska caribou and the Arctic Small Tool populations that relied on them. The research results, which draw on several independent lines of evidence, unequivocally support the study‘s main thesis as an explanation for the rise of Eskimo and Aleut populations ii and cultural traditions. Viewed generally, these results also make a strong case that northern volcanic eruptions have had greater impacts to subarctic/arctic populations than previously thought. Such eruptions had the potential to extirpate human populations from regions and leave them unpopulated for decades or centuries, particularly if the affected landscapes were confined by hostile environments. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation is broadly focused and has taken a decade to complete, leaving me indebted to a great many people, in many different fields, for the help and input they have provided. This dissertation developed from my involvement on a project in Southwest Alaska with the National Park Service. I would like to thank Jeanne Schaaf, NPS Cultural Resource Manager, for employing me on the Aniakchak Archaeological Survey project. The survey put me in a position to confront the intriguing ecological and cultural questions that archaeologists deal with in southwest Alaska. Jeanne encouraged me to pursue the concept that Alaska Peninsula volcanism had formed ecological boundaries and divisions between prehistoric cultures. She also graciously granted permission for use of text and figures from the archaeological overview and assessment of Aniakchak National Monument and Preserve (VanderHoek and Myron 2004). I was very fortunate in receiving financial support for this project from several sources. NPS National Natural Landmark administrator Judy Alderson was instrumental in my receiving a National Natural Landmark Grant from NPS for logistical support on the Alaska Peninsula in 2001, which allowed the pollen and soil testing reported in this dissertation. Anna Kerttula was very helpful and supportive in my foray into the National Science Foundation grant submittal process, resulting in NSF support via a Dissertation Improvement Grant (#1116325). The completion of this dissertation required months away from my employment. I would like to thank Judy Bittner and Dave McMahan from the Alaska Office of History and Archaeology for their continued support, allowing me to take the time needed to complete this project. iv The intellectual attraction of a multidisciplinary project such as this is the exploration of information from other disciplines. The danger is that one is constantly working with bodies of literature outside of one‘s parent discipline, literature which may have been unevenly sampled, allowing the generation of erroneous conclusions apparent to someone working in that field. I have been very fortunate in the amount of help I have received from professionals in other disciplines. Chief among these are the following four people. Tina Neal and Game McGimsey, volcanologists with the USGS Alaska Volcano Observatory, have been very gracious and patient with my numerous requests for references, photos, and advice on volcanic eruptions and their related effects. Layne Adams, caribou biologist with the USGS Biological Resources Division, provided thoughtful discussions evaluating the possible effects of volcanic products on caribou. Gary Michaelson, soil scientist for the University of Alaska Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, provided invaluable guidance on the analysis and interpretation of soil data from the Alaska Peninsula. Other individuals over the past decade that have provided helpful comments, references, or other support include: Joseph Antos, Leonid Baskin, Jeff Blackford, Ted Birkdal, Elisabeth Brouwers, Joan Dale, Alan Depew, Mark Elson, Peter Frenzen, Ray Gavlak, John Grattan, Patricia Heiser, Maureen Howard, Sherrie Johnson, James Jordan, Darrell Kaufman, Garrett Knudson, Michael Livingston, Alan Levenson, Herbert Maschner, Thomas Miller, Katie Meyers, Vladimir Mikhailov, Nicole Misarti, Tom O‘Hara, Mathew O‘Leary, Richard Payne, Nicholas Pearce, Vera Ponomareva, Sharon Prien, James Riehle, Bud Rice, Page Spencer, Robert Toby, Robin Torrence, Patrick Saltonstall, Theodore Schurr, Robert Shaw, Dale Vinson, Kristi Wallace, Christopher Waythomas, John Westgate, and Gregory Zielinski. v It was a pleasure to work with geologist Robert Nelson from Colby College, who was attracted to the project after seeing a photo of the Cabin Bluff profile. Bob spent many days sampling, then processing and counting to produce the fascinating pollen record for Cabin Bluff. Several individuals provided crucial technical support to this endeavor. Judy Kesler provided critical 11th hour computer support. William Kiger provided false-color satellite images and soil testing locations for the Valley of Ten Thousand Smokes and the Aniakchak National Monument and Preserve. I would like to thank my friends Thomas Dilley, Michael Hilton and Randolph Tedor for their field support and endless stimulating discussions on the topics included in this dissertation as well as many others. I was fortunate to work with Tom on Late Pleistocene sites in the Tanana Valley, and then for three field seasons (1998-2000) on the Alaska Peninsula. Tom is very good at teaching the archaeologists he works with the geology they need to know to do their job appropriately, as well as keeping them grounded in the real world. Tom‘s geological report (Dilley 2000) on his geomorphic and tephra work during the Aniakchak archaeological survey formed the basis for several chapters in the final NPS archaeological overview and assessment, as well as a background for my work in the region. Mike Hilton was an invaluable field partner on the 1997 and 1998 Aniakchak surveys. His warmth, good humor, and professionalism make him a standout in the field. I have been fortunate to work with Randy for five field seasons (2004-2007, 2009), as we share the same love of the outdoors and enthusiasm for the past. I am fortunate to have had the friendship and advice of William and Karen Workman for the last two decades. It was Bill‘s Introduction to Anthropology class the spring of 1987, his archaeological field school later that summer in Kachemak Bay, and his role serving as my undergraduate advisor, that started me on this adventure. Karen worked with me on the vi Aniakchak project, and was an important part of the Aniakchak field crew in 2000. Bill‘s willingness to serve on my dissertation committee brought the process full circle. I would like to thank Stan Ambrose and Thomas Emerson for their willingness to serve on my committee. Both provided suggestions that added considerably to the end result. This dissertation would not have been finished without the continual support of my advisor, Barry Lewis. Barry kept faith in me while I was distracted for years by home, family and job. His intercession on my behalf with the University of Illinois Graduate College procured a tuition waver that allowed savings to be put toward living expenses while I took time off work to write. His rigorous editing tightened up and clarified the final document. The other two people that made this dissertation possible are my wife Susan Bender and daughter Marlena VanderHoek. Their love and emotional support
Recommended publications
  • Archaeology Resources
    Archaeology Resources Page Intentionally Left Blank Archaeological Resources Background Archaeological Resources are defined as “any prehistoric or historic district, site, building, structure, or object [including shipwrecks]…Such term includes artifacts, records, and remains which are related to such a district, site, building, structure, or object” (National Historic Preservation Act, Sec. 301 (5) as amended, 16 USC 470w(5)). Archaeological resources are either historic or prehistoric and generally include properties that are 50 years old or older and are any of the following: • Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history • Associated with the lives of persons significant in the past • Embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction • Represent the work of a master • Possess high artistic values • Present a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction • Have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in history These resources represent the material culture of past generations of a region’s prehistoric and historic inhabitants, and are basic to our understanding of the knowledge, beliefs, art, customs, property systems, and other aspects of the nonmaterial culture. Further, they are subject to National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) review if they are historic properties, meaning those that are on, or eligible for placement on, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). These sites are referred to as historic properties. Section 106 requires agencies to make a reasonable and good faith efforts to identify historic properties. Archaeological resources may be found in the Proposed Project Area both offshore and onshore.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Interagency Operating Plan for Volcanic Ash Episodes
    Alaska Interagency Operating Plan for Volcanic Ash Episodes MAY 1, 2008 Cover: A plume of volcanic gas and water vapor rises above the summit crater and growing lava dome at Augustine Volcano in southern Cook Inlet. A mantle of light brown ash discolors the snow on the upper flanks. View is towards the southwest. Photograph taken by C. Read, U.S. Geological Survey, January 24, 2006. Alaska Volcano Observatory database image from http://www.avo.alaska.edu/image.php?id=7051. Alaska Interagency Operating Plan for Volcanic Ash Episodes May 1, 2008 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Integrated Response to Volcanic Ash ....................................................................... 3 1.2 Data Collection and Processing ................................................................................ 4 1.3 Information Management and Coordination .............................................................. 4 1.4 Distribution and Dissemination.................................................................................. 5 2.0 Responsibilities of the Participating Agencies ........................................................... 5 2.1 ALASKA DIVISION OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT (DHS&EM) .............................................................................. 5 2.2 ALASKA VOLCANO OBSERVATORY (AVO)........................................................... 6 2.2.1 Organization.....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Helicopter Tour to Kuril Lake-Caldera of Volcano Ksudach-Khodutkinskye Hot Springs (Tour 2)
    HELICOPTER TOUR TO VALLEY OF GEYSERS-CALDERA OF VOLCANO UZON-NALYCHEVO VALLEY (TOUR 1) Period – all the year Transportation – helicopter Tour time – 6 hours Flight time – approximately 2 hours 15 minutes The famous Valley of Geysers is a canyon which has one of the biggest geyser area in the world. It is hidden in a hard access gorge of the Kronotsky Nature Reserve. It is unrivalled in beauty, landscape grandeur and number of springs throwing out fountains of hot water and steam. Gushing geysers, raging mud cauldrons, a turquoise lake, hot water and steam jets flowing down the slopes together with the lush greenery of grass and trees create a really fantastic sight. Not far from the Valley of Geysers there is one more unique and impressive place - Uzon caldera. It is a giant cavity with the dimensions 9×12 km, resulting from destruction of the ancient volcano, having an intensive hydrothermal activity on the bottom. There are a lot of boiling and raging craters, numerous mud cauldrons and small volcanoes, yellow fumaroles areas, steamy grounds where the steam and hot water come out from the earth. The peculiarity of this place is the crater-like holes 25-40 m deep and in diameter 25-150 m, in which hot lakes of odd colours are situated. ROUTE 11.00-12.00 - Flight from heliport of Yelizovo city to the Valley of Geysers. Flying around Karymskiy and Malyi Semyachik active volcanoes. 12.00-13.30 - Excursion to the Valley of Geysers. 13.30-13.40 - Flying to the Uzon caldera. 13.40-14.30 - Excursion in the caldera of Uzon volcano.
    [Show full text]
  • Large Igneous Provinces and Mass Extinctions: an Update
    Downloaded from specialpapers.gsapubs.org on April 29, 2015 OLD G The Geological Society of America Special Paper 505 2014 OPEN ACCESS Large igneous provinces and mass extinctions: An update David P.G. Bond* Department of Geography, Environment and Earth Science, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK, and Norwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, 9296 Tromsø, Norway Paul B. Wignall School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK ABSTRACT The temporal link between mass extinctions and large igneous provinces is well known. Here, we examine this link by focusing on the potential climatic effects of large igneous province eruptions during several extinction crises that show the best correlation with mass volcanism: the Frasnian-Famennian (Late Devonian), Capi- tanian (Middle Permian), end-Permian, end-Triassic, and Toarcian (Early Jurassic) extinctions. It is clear that there is no direct correlation between total volume of lava and extinction magnitude because there is always suffi cient recovery time between individual eruptions to negate any cumulative effect of successive fl ood basalt erup- tions. Instead, the environmental and climatic damage must be attributed to single- pulse gas effusions. It is notable that the best-constrained examples of death-by- volcanism record the main extinction pulse at the onset of (often explosive) volcanism (e.g., the Capitanian, end-Permian, and end-Triassic examples), suggesting that the rapid injection of vast quantities of volcanic gas (CO2 and SO2) is the trigger for a truly major biotic catastrophe. Warming and marine anoxia feature in many extinc- tion scenarios, indicating that the ability of a large igneous province to induce these proximal killers (from CO2 emissions and thermogenic greenhouse gases) is the single most important factor governing its lethality.
    [Show full text]
  • Source of the Great A.D. 1257 Mystery Eruption Unveiled, Samalas Volcano, Rinjani Volcanic Complex, Indonesia
    Source of the great A.D. 1257 mystery eruption unveiled, Samalas volcano, Rinjani Volcanic Complex, Indonesia Franck Lavignea,1, Jean-Philippe Degeaia,b, Jean-Christophe Komorowskic, Sébastien Guilletd, Vincent Roberta, Pierre Lahittee, Clive Oppenheimerf, Markus Stoffeld,g, Céline M. Vidalc, Suronoh, Indyo Pratomoi, Patrick Wassmera,j, Irka Hajdask, Danang Sri Hadmokol, and Edouard de Belizala aUniversité Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, Département de Géographie, and Laboratoire de Géographie Physique, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 8591, 92195 Meudon, France; bUniversité Montpellier 3 Paul Valéry and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5140, 34970 Lattes, France; cInstitut de Physique du Globe, Equipe Géologie des Systèmes Volcaniques, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7654, Sorbonne Paris-Cité, 75238 Paris Cedex 05, France; dInstitute of Geological Sciences, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; eDépartement des Sciences de la Terre (IDES), Université Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France; fDepartment of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EN, United Kingdom; gDepartment of Earth Sciences, Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Geneva, 1227 Carouge, Switzerland; hCenter for Volcanology and Geological Hazard Mitigation, Geological Agency, 40122 Bandung, Indonesia; iGeological Museum, Geological Agency, 40122 Bandung, Indonesia; jFaculté de Géographie et d’Aménagement, Université de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France; kLaboratory of Ion Beam Physics, Eidgenössiche Technische Hochschule, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland; and lFaculty of Geography, Department of Environmental Geography, Gadjah Mada University, Bulaksumur, 55281 Yogyakarta, Indonesia Edited by Ikuo Kushiro, University of Tokyo, Tsukuba, Japan, and approved September 4, 2013 (received for review April 21, 2013) Polar ice core records attest to a colossal volcanic eruption that northern hemisphere in A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Volcanic Arc of Kamchatka: a Province with High-␦18O Magma Sources and Large-Scale 18O/16O Depletion of the Upper Crust
    Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Vol. 68, No. 4, pp. 841–865, 2004 Copyright © 2004 Elsevier Ltd Pergamon Printed in the USA. All rights reserved 0016-7037/04 $30.00 ϩ .00 doi:10.1016/j.gca.2003.07.009 Volcanic arc of Kamchatka: a province with high-␦18O magma sources and large-scale 18O/16O depletion of the upper crust 1, 2 3 1 ILYA N. BINDEMAN, *VERA V. PONOMAREVA, JOHN C. BAILEY, and JOHN W. VALLEY 1Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA 2Institute of Volcanic Geology and Geochemistry, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, Russia 3Geologisk Institut, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (Received March 20, 2003; accepted in revised form July 16, 2003) Abstract—We present the results of a regional study of oxygen and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopes of Pleistocene to Recent arc volcanism in the Kamchatka Peninsula and the Kuriles, with emphasis on the largest caldera- forming centers. The ␦18O values of phenocrysts, in combination with numerical crystallization modeling (MELTS) and experimental fractionation factors, are used to derive best estimates of primary values for ␦18O(magma). Magmatic ␦18O values span 3.5‰ and are correlated with whole-rock Sr-Nd-Pb isotopes and major elements. Our data show that Kamchatka is a region of isotopic diversity with high-␦18O basaltic magmas (sampling mantle to lower crustal high-␦18O sources), and low-␦18O silicic volcanism (sampling low-␦18O upper crust). Among one hundred Holocene and Late Pleistocene eruptive units from 23 volcanic centers, one half represents low-␦18O magmas (ϩ4 to 5‰). Most low-␦ 18O magmas are voluminous silicic ignimbrites related to large Ͼ10 km3 caldera-forming eruptions and subsequent intracaldera lavas and domes: Holocene multi-caldera Ksudach volcano, Karymsky and Kurile Lake-Iliinsky calderas, and Late Pleistocene Maly Semyachik, Akademy Nauk, and Uzon calderas.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Alaska's Volcanic Landforms and Features
    Chapter 4 Alaska's Volcanic Landforms and Features Resources • Alaska Volcano Observatory website. (Available at http://www.avo.alaska.edu.) • Brantley, S.R., 1999, Volcanoes of the United States: U.S. Geological Survey General Interest Publication. (Available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/volcus/index.html.) • Miller, T.P., McGimsey, R.G., Richter, D.H., Riehle, J.R., Nye, C.J., Yount, M.E., and Dumoulin, J.A., 1998, Catalog of the historically active volcanoes of Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 98-0582, 104 p. (Also available at http://www.avo.alaska.edu/downloads/classresults.php?citid=645.) • Nye, C.J., and others, 1998, Volcanoes of Alaska: Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys Information Circular IC 0038, accessed June 1, 2010, at . PDF Front (6.4 MB) http://www.dggs.dnr.state.ak.us/webpubs/dggs/ic/oversized/ic038_sh001.PDF and . PDF Back (6.6 MB) http://www.dggs.dnr.state.ak.us/webpubs/dggs/ic/oversized/ic038_sh002.PDF. • Smithsonian Institution, [n.d.], Global volcanism program—Augustine: Smithsonian Institution web page, accessed June 1, 2010, at http://www.volcano.si.edu/world/volcano.cfm?vnum=1103-01- &volpage=photos&phoyo=026071. • Tilling, R.I., 1997, Volcanoes—On-line edition: U.S. Geological Survey General Interest Product. (Available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/volc/.) • U.S. Geological Survey, 1997 [2007], Volcanoes teacher’s guide: U.S. Geological Survey website. (Available at http://erg.usgs.gov/isb/pubs/teachers- packets/volcanoes/. • U.S. Geological Survey, 2010, Volcano Hazards Program—USGS photo glossary of volcanic terms: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Open-File Report 2004-1234
    Catalog of Earthquake Hypocenters at Alaskan Volcanoes: January 1 through December 31, 2003 By James P. Dixon1, Scott D. Stihler2, John A. Power3, Guy Tytgat2, Seth C. Moran4, John J. Sánchez2, Stephen R. McNutt2, Steve Estes2, and John Paskievitch3 Open-File Report 2004-1234 2004 Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey 1 Alaska Volcano Observatory, U. S. Geological Survey, 903 Koyukuk Drive, Fairbanks, AK 99775-7320 2 Alaska Volcano Observatory, Geophysical Institute, 903 Koyukuk Drive, Fairbanks, AK 99775-7320 3 Alaska Volcano Observatory, U. S. Geological Survey, 4200 University Drive, Anchorage, AK 99508-4667 4 Cascades Volcano Observatory, U. S. Geological Survey, 1300 SE Cardinal Ct., Bldg. 10, Vancouver, WA 99508 2 CONTENTS Introduction...................................................................................................3 Instrumentation .............................................................................................5 Data Acquisition and Reduction ...................................................................8 Velocity Models...........................................................................................10 Seismicity.....................................................................................................11 Summary......................................................................................................14 References....................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating a Fluorosis Hazard After a Volcanic Eruption
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/15253810 Evaluating a Fluorosis Hazard after a Volcanic Eruption Article in Archives of Environmental Health An International Journal · October 1994 DOI: 10.1080/00039896.1994.9954992 · Source: PubMed CITATIONS READS 37 59 6 authors, including: Professor Eric K. Noji, M.D. King Saud University 295 PUBLICATIONS 3,601 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: ICARUS | Max Planck Institute for Ornithology View project The Effects of Extreme Environmental Conditions on Human Physiology and Survivability View project All content following this page was uploaded by Professor Eric K. Noji, M.D. on 19 April 2015. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Evaluating a Fluorosis Hazard after a Volcanic Eruption CAROL H. RUBIN JORGE GRANDE Epidemic Inlelligence Service U.S. Agency for International Development Epidemiology Program Office Office of Disaster Assistance Atlanta, Georgia San Jose, Costa Rica ERICK. NOJI F. VITTANI Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Ministry of Health and Social Action National Center for Environmental Health Buenos Aires, Argentina Atlanta, Georgia PAULJ. SELIGMAN JOHN L. HOLTZ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Cincinnati, Ohio ABSTRACT. The August, 1991 eruption of Mt. Hudson (Chile) deposited ash across southern Argentina and contributed to the deaths of thousands
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Pyroclastic Fall Hazard Through Field Data And
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Earth-prints Repository JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 108, NO. B2, 2063, doi:10.1029/2001JB000642, 2003 Assessing pyroclastic fall hazard through field data and numerical simulations: Example from Vesuvius Raffaello Cioni,1 Antonella Longo,2 Giovanni Macedonio,3 Roberto Santacroce,2 Alessandro Sbrana,2 Roberto Sulpizio,2 and Daniele Andronico4 Received 12 April 2001; revised 2 April 2002; accepted 7 May 2002; published 1 Feburary 2003. [1] A general methodology of pyroclastic fall hazard assessment is proposed on the basis of integrated results of field studies and numerical simulations. These approaches result in two different methods of assessing hazard: (1) the ‘‘field frequency,’’ based on the thickness and distribution of past deposits and (2) the ‘‘simulated probability,’’ based on the numerical modeling of tephra transport and fallout. The proposed methodology mostly applies to volcanoes that, by showing a clear correlation between the repose time and the magnitude of the following eruptions, allows the definition of a reference ‘‘maximum expected event’’ (MEE). The application to Vesuvius is shown in detail. Using the field frequency method, stratigraphic data of 24 explosive events in the 3–6 volcanic explosivity index range in the last 18,000 years of activity are extrapolated to a regular grid in order to obtain the frequency of exceedance in the past of a certain threshold value of mass loading (100, 200, 300, and 400 kg/m2). Using the simulated probability method, the mass loading related to the MEE is calculated based on the expected erupted mass (5 Â 1011 kg), the wind velocity profiles recorded during 14 years, and various column heights and grain-size populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Pleistocene Volcanism in the Anahim Volcanic Belt, West-Central British Columbia
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2014-10-24 A Second North American Hot-spot: Pleistocene Volcanism in the Anahim Volcanic Belt, west-central British Columbia Kuehn, Christian Kuehn, C. (2014). A Second North American Hot-spot: Pleistocene Volcanism in the Anahim Volcanic Belt, west-central British Columbia (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/25002 http://hdl.handle.net/11023/1936 doctoral thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY A Second North American Hot-spot: Pleistocene Volcanism in the Anahim Volcanic Belt, west-central British Columbia by Christian Kuehn A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS CALGARY, ALBERTA OCTOBER, 2014 © Christian Kuehn 2014 Abstract Alkaline and peralkaline magmatism occurred along the Anahim Volcanic Belt (AVB), a 330 km long linear feature in west-central British Columbia. The belt includes three felsic shield volcanoes, the Rainbow, Ilgachuz and Itcha ranges as its most notable features, as well as regionally extensive cone fields, lava flows, dyke swarms and a pluton. Volcanic activity took place periodically from the Late Miocene to the Holocene.
    [Show full text]
  • PROPERN of Fairbanks, AK 99709 DGGS LIBRARY Open File Repod 98-582 Icpbs
    EUSGS science tor a changing- - world DEPARTMENT OF THE iMTEIWlOR U.S. GEBLOGIICAL SURVEY I I CATALOG OF THE HISTORICALLY ACTIVE VOLCANOES OF ALASKA T.P. Miller I, R.G. McGirnsey l, D.W.Richter I, J.R. Riehle $ CC.J.Nye 2, M.E. \daunt l, and J.A. Durnoufin lU.S, Wlogieal Suwey Anehwage, AK 99508 2AlaskoDivisWl of Gedoglcaland Geophysicol Surveys PROPERN OF Fairbanks, AK 99709 DGGS LIBRARY Open File Repod 98-582 IcPBS Done in cooperation with the lnternaticnai Association of Volcanology and Chemistry of the Earth's Interior (IAVCEI) and the Catalog of Active Volcanoes of the W~rld(CAVW) Project This repart is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards (or with the North American Stsatigraphlc Code). Any use of trade. product or firm names is for I I descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Wew 10 t/7c west across the s~lrnrnircaldera of Mr. U+angell. The Eusf Crarer (foreground),North Crater (steaming)atld Ukst Crater (le~?)arc on the rim of rhe 4x6 krn cllldem. Mr. Dnrm is in the right background. Phoro by R.J. Motyka. Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................................................i Previous work .......................................................................................................................................................................ii Methodology ........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]